>> |
!EhE8ram93U 02/09/12(Thu)19:40:42 No.1378690Except,
nearly no one who has all of those things "manned up". At one point,
all of us were infants entirely unable to take care of ourselves.
We received food and then we received other things.
An education, private, public, or none. A place to live, nice, okay, or collapsing. A kind of healthcare, either world class, public, or none. A network, either well connected parents, poorly connected parents, or negatively connected parents.
If you're going to preach a meritocracy, you should realize the huge hypocrisy.
A
real meritocracy is not possible in a capitalist political system in
which inheritance and social influence skew the playing field. When you
can buy your kids an extremely expensive education, furnish them with a
study and a full library, give them full medical care (and even some
$2,000 HGH therapy to boost their height, done frequently), and then get
them into Yale, Harvard, Stanford, or a Fortune 100 company just by
calling a person in your network--
You can't pretend that any of those kids earned it. No one earns anything. They are set up in situations.
You can talk about the "rags to riches" stories. I can talk about other people winning the lotto.
Just because someone wins the lotto does not mean the lotto is a system that successfully creates wealth for individuals. Just
because one person went "rags to riches" does not mean that a
capitalist system promotes the success of better and smarter people. |