Stop comparing this ugly guy to moot.

Moot is attractive and doesn't have an asymmetrical face.

They don't look anything a like.

>>12942777
hmm, if that's the kind of response.. then I might take this post to /new/

>>12942777
I wonder, does moot get a lot of pussy because of his internet celebrity status?

zuckerberg reminds me of some animal but not sure what

>>12942785
>I wonder, does moot get a lot of cock because of his internet celebrity status?
fixed

>>12942777

that doesn't answer op's question at all

then again it doesn't matter because op is a fag

nice trips btw.

>>12942789
A frog, or one of those little furry things from Madagascar?

Kind of. It's odd, but facebook seems to keep the masses complacent because if they do or say anything against the norm everyone will know, and they risk rejection.

The antithesis? That's a strange word to use, I'd say the solution to.
In any case, facebook sucks.
I don't use it and never will.
I refuse to be friends with people who do.

>Do think the 4chan anonymous concept is an anti-thesis to the (no?) privacy situation from facebook?

It is. Mark thinks the idea of anonymity on the internet is ridiculous.

I think his Facebook is ridiculous. I think moot deserves at least a few million for this accomplishment. He's clearly made an influential, notorious board.

Zuckerberg's bread and butter is stupid assholes putting too much info' on his website. He probably believes in privacy even more than we do.

>>12942832
Which is why you're foreveralone.

The entire time I was watching The Social Network, I was comparing Mark to moot.

>>12942921
moot is a fucking handsome man.

>>12942923
He isn't handsome, but that face could convince anyone to have sex with him.

>>12942771
>Do think the 4chan anonymous concept is an anti-thesis to the (no?) privacy situation from facebook?

That holds water.

You also asked for our thoughts, so here's that. Both philosophies have demonstrated an ability to attract hordes of people. We see Facebook having people embrace their identities and similar non-anonymous sites create connection where they wouldn't otherwise exist. Then you look at a site like 4chan that has this culture of disliking --shunning -- anyone who displays one iota of uniqueness. Look at how we generally treat tripfags and camwhores. This culture seems to affect our users in such a way that it forms a hefty part of their identity, like those guys you see on youtube who can't seem to stop spouting memes.

I guess what I'm getting at is, 4chan is fun, but the "anonymous concept," as you put it, can have a really huge negative affect. Whereas, aside from the odd facebook fite, social networking only tends to bring people together.

apples and oranges. one is an imageboard where people come to discuss common interests and be rude to one another, the other is a social networking tool that is used to stay in the loop with whats going on with all your friends and relatives, a friend organizer if you will. people who hate facebook just hate it because they don't have any friends to keep in touch with.

I can go out to some bar in New York and hang with moot. Zuckerberg is just a face for a corporation.

4chan is a movement. It's a refreshing alternative to the trend on persistent online personalities. Facebook brings people to the internet.

with the speed of the world being the way it is, 4chan offers freedom; facebook offers being able to keep pace.

they are not opposing forces, but rather different trends in human relations. I will never accept the influx of normalfags onto the internet as progress. anonymity is privacy, and that is a diminishing concept in this world. long live 4chan.

>>12942950
Typically, the reason people hate on tripfags is that they only do it for attention and to build an image as someone "important". On a site like Facebook, where your profile directly connects to your personal life, then yes, being known is important. However, on a site like 4chan, there is (typically) no reason for one to need to be known.

>>12942777
Dude,
I'd fuck moot so damn hard...
so
damn
hard.
Nice trips, also.

Does anyone else think Facebook will just become like Myspace (and Live Journal before that) in another 3-4 years after the novelty wears off?

>>12942995
yes.

and Xanga, anyone at all remember Xanga?

>>12942995
I remember when not having a myspace meant you weren't normal. It's the exact same thing with facebook now.

>>12942969
>a friend organizer

God, this has to be one of the most stupid concepts ever. Why, society, why.

I don't like that 4chan has become a community. I don't like that this is becoming more and more like any other site on the internet.

What made 4chan so great was the lack of a community. Nobody here wanted to be a part of anything (at least in the beginning), but rather wanted an anonymous outlet to vent and express themselves.

Moot really had something special here for about 2 years but he let it slip through his fingers.

In Shin Megami Tensei terms, Mark = Law, moot = Chaos.
Who is neutral?

I think that the two of them represent different needs and values, neither being significantly better or worse than the other. One might say that they represent a balance, something that is good in any application. On one hand, you have something that allows you to have an identity in a place that is very impersonal, and in the other you have something that gives you a completely anonymous outlet. Both have their own merits an disadvantages, and both attract a great deal of users.

I think antithesis is the wrong word to use, rather they are two sides of the same coin.

>>12943008
>>12943008
Who gives a shit.
I never had a myspace, I'll never have a facebook.
Fuck conformity.

>>12943464

Hey OP, I found your pic
>u so edgy

>>12943486
I'm not OP, and I'm not some fat goth loser.
Go follow your peers.

>>12943008
Except that nothing is going to beat Facebook now.
Nothing.
It went from 150,000,000 users to 500,000,000 users in a year, and now has a net worth of $50 billion.

>>12943495
There will always be something bigger.

>>12943520
Not for a very, very long time.

>>12943563
This is true, although I'm willing to bet that something with a less unusual name and a more 'real world'-esque system/dynamic (as compared to some of Facebook's odd, more net-centric features) will be the next big one.

In a totally heterosexual way, I have to say that moot is handsome.

If a new social website comes out that picks up users, I'd probably hop on the bandwagon. It's annoying when my parents and aunts and uncles comment on all my shit and tag me in pictures that I'm not even in.

>>12943694
Social networking is stupid.
Have you ever considered socialising IN REAL LIFE, instead of spending half an hour talking to people in real life and then simulating social interaction over the internet for five hours?
What is the point? Why don't you communicate in person, or use a phone?
What possible use can it serve that can not already be accomplished in real life?
It's fucking stupid. It's vacuous. It's a waste of time. You're giving away your privacy. It's an e-penis contest. It's alienating and dehumanising.

>>12944184
LOL HEY GUYS
He hates social networking, he must have
>nofriends
laughing_society.bmp

>implying moot doesn't store all our IPs and hand them over to FBI like the little fag he is whenever shit goes down on 4chan.

the privacy is an illusion...