Nobody cares what you think, tripfag.

Fuck off.

whats really sad is people like you getting upset over what other are doing on an imageboard. this isnt some super secret klub anymore. get over it you fag.

man I dunno /r9k/ is changing... /soc/ is a pile of shit. I like being anon, I don't wanna know any of you fags in real life... gawd. i like /r9k/ before all these stupid changes... /b/ sucks makes me feel retarded knowing everyone in there is 13. w/e guess its time to leave this place.

/soc/ IS A LIGHTNING ROD.

It's not meant to provide quality shit. It's meant to take the meet-up/camwhore/cock/etc threads away from /b/ and /r9k/. It's essentially chemo. You're taking the problem and putting it in a place where nobody looks.

Too many people went to /r9k/ crying for advice, so /adv/ was created. Pokemon flooded /v/, so /vp/ was created.

I think it is a good idea because it actually might work and /b/ might actually become something occasionally maybe perhaps with a bit of luck resembling good.

>>12861707
It's not that I care that MORE people come, it's the TYPE of people that I'm concerned with.

You've seen what /b/ has become. What if that happens to the rest of the site?

>>12861716
>>implying you know anyone on here irl because they posted a pic or name

/soc/ is basically just /cock/ within hours of its creation

new Craigslist for geeks

Awww, too bad faggot.

Now you're gonna have to find ANOTHER website to whine about your problems on.

>>12861810
It's people like you who are making this site progressively shittier.

/soc/ is isolating the cancer that was plaguing /r9k/ and a few other boards.

No one's forcing you to go to it, and I assure I have no intentions of ever going there.

/soc/ is clearly the canv.as beta

>>12861731
Hi, you must be new. You know nothing of the long term effects on 4chan or any of their boards. Go away.

The problem is trip fags treating it like a blog

and the heavy increase in normal people coming here, but that can't be stopped, they'll just keep posting shit memes and cam threads in /soc/

i don't think 4chan is salvageable from this, i just keep my expectations of 4chan very low now in terms of quality lulz and go to 7chan instead

You know that 4chan is becoming more mainstream each fucking day. At least we have a board aimed at attention whores now.

You know... the entire point of creating a new board is for those who desire to go there because they share the same interests.

If you do not share that interest you can always NOT venture to that board.

The entire site is not somehow inherently worse because there is a new board you personally disagree with.

Just stick to the boards you feel comfortable.

I think its a great idea, many people grew very tired of those daily rate me and contact threads, me included. I mean come on, this board's quality already increased bigtime after /soc/ was made.

>>12861861
holy shit i remember you tripfag

you my friend are also the fucking problem, i needed help when some bitch was stalking me and you said this


BromackSays !lK4GD5SleY 12/16/10(Thu)04:01:07 No.12477459
Pix or please gtfo. I really don't want to give /adv/ if you're not gonna post a picture.


son of a bitch, gtfo of my 4chan tripfaggot

>>12861861
Then please, O' "Enlightened one", explain how I'm an idiot instead of just directly contradicting me.
ANYONE can do that.

>>12861896
Woah, woah, woah. It's been almost a month since I started using this trip? FUCK YEAH. This is the longest I've ever stuck to a name. Thanks, bro.

Not to mention, lolololololol you have that saved. BETA AS FUCK.

>>12861890

Now if we could just reconsolidate /lit/ /sci/ and /new/ back into /r9k/ we'd have our amazing board back. Now I feel like /r9k/ is naked in a new frontier and we'll just have to see where it takes us. I think many >greentext stories and rampant misogynistic diatribes lie ahead.

>>12861663

/soc/ is a quarantine. It's the leper colony of 4chan. I more than welcome its creation.

OH FUCKING RAGE

HURR LETS LET ABNOXIOUS 16 YEAR OLDS BITCH FOR ATTENTION
WOW GG MOOT

Don't worry over 4chan turning into facebook because the opposite is just being under way. Facebook is being channoformed.

Pic related: It's me and my dark side whyumadtho.jpg

>>12861908
holy shit you are a king amongst trolls, its under a file called the love of my life, stick with the trip i want to remember every time i see it my love

garner you're pitiful amounts of e-fame you glorious faggot
<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3

(>implying that alpha-beta arguments are real and have anything to do with society outside of America, the worlds most fucked up country in terms of women and social interaction)

>>12861925
>i want to keep AM I CUTE?/POST PICS/IM RONERY on /r9k
>derp everywhere

>>12861922
>>12861724
>>12861726
>>12861843
>>12861877
See, this actually makes sense.

Thank you, now I won't have to worry about ignorant NORPs polluting the board.

>>12861945
oh shit is that...

>>12861897

I've been here for five years and 4chan hasn't gotten any better or any worse, well, except for sporadic parts like Project Chanology, but overall it only changes subtly over time like whenever we get new boards or others are put down. Hobbies change and you find your group of channers and stick with them, then you grow tired of them and then you go back to them at another time. I've gone through more cycles of hating and loving /b/ than I'd like to think about just because it emphasizes how long I've been here and how my life has progressively deteriorated, but there are other factors bigger than 4chan that caused that, I suppose.

>>12861945
>Implying that's not INCREDIBLY CREEPY.

You also screwed up your >implying.

e-fame? I don't do this for e-fame, I do it because it's lulzy.

Lastly,
>Implying Alpha and Beta aren't real and they don't apply to all of the animal kingdom.

If /soc/ is renamed to /bitches and whores/, it'll be ok

>>12861945
Also it helps me keep track when I make stupid arguments and people pretend to be me to derail a good argument.

none of us will comprehend what moot will do with this until it's too late

>>12861973

I think /baw/ would send an confusing message to the rest of 4chan.

>>12861968
>lulzy
>acts like a thirteen year old boy who just discovered anonymity
>writes shit like lololololol

Just get the fuck back to /toy/.

>>12861982

And then l'II just go party with Kirtaner when that day comes.

>>12861981
>>12861968
>>12861945
>>12861908
>>12861896
I must say, this little cat fight going on here is rather hilarious.

>>12861990
>Implying /toy/ isn't full of 30 year olds who masturbate over action figures from the 80's.

I think it's funny how there's already /soc/iopaths there stalking people.

OP, you must be fucking retarded. /soc/ is a good thing, it pretty much isolates a large chunk of the cancer that has been plaguing /r9k/ and other boards. The fact is that the cancerfags were hated enough for moot to have to isolate them to keep the rest of the userbase happy; while the best thing to do would have been to ban all tripfaggotry and blogging shit, /soc/ is the second best thing. Be happy with what we've gotten.

>>12862008
Really?

Elaborate please.

stalkerblox

>>12862003
>Implying that you don't also love this argument because it's giving you precious, precious bumps.

so wait are contact threads and the like now bannable offenses if done on other boards?

oh for the love god please tell me that's what's going to happen

>>12862019
Imply that I'm an attention whore all you want, all I wanted to know was how this new board would affect the site as a whole.

You're a thoroughly unpleasant person, I hope you know that.

>>12861950
How about we BAN them all?

>>12862018
I'd tell you, but I want to leave the stalker alone so I can see what he does.

>>12862033
>Implying you've been on 4chan long enough to even have an intelligent opinion on it if you can't even Imply correctly.

>>12862038
Honestly, I think moot is gonna pull what he did with the furry board.

Ironic coming from some tinychatting faggot.

You are the reason that board exists, super cancerous fucks.

Tripfags acting like they're not losers ITT

oh boy.

>>12862054

Newfaggot here I guess, care to inform of what happened to them?

>>12862047
Perhaps you should read my post again, because I wasn't implying anything at all.

This is one of your "stupid arguments", I take it?

I think it's a good thing really. It allows most of the shitposting to go somewhere else. Sure, you'll occasionally get the posts in /b/, but the main drivers for this is how big 4chan (particularl /b/) has become in terms of userbase, and the fact that there isn't enough money to pay mods to ban the shit out of everyone who shitposts.

>>12862060
I kind of stole this name from them, actually. I do like to lurk their room though, they are somewhat interesting.

Do you have their new password?

>>12862075
You didn't want to know how this would affect 4chan as a whole. You made your opinion in your OP.

Stop being a GIGANTIC ASS RAPING FAGGOT and realize that you shouldn't be angry. You shouldn't care. If you don't browse the board, be glad that the people who were doing the hookup threads aren't in /r9k/.

You're probably one of the people who bitched when they made /adv/ or /sci/.

>>12862090
The password has never changed man.

I'm still under the impression that moot os going to permaban every poster on /soc/ soon. Like he did with that furry board he made

>facebook 2.0

You mean /b2/, because that's what it is.
Just browsing it for a couple seconds gives you that /b/ feel.

>>12862094
I made this thread because I misunderstood moot's intentions for /soc/.
People have explained it to me, and now I'm back to being indifferent about it.
Perhaps I shouldn't have just simply assumed that moot was promoting threads such as these, but yeah.

>>12862106
I posted once and then thought of this.

AM SORRY MOOT
MY ONLY POST WAS
>REPORTING FOR UNDERAGEB&

>>12862094
>>12862054
>>12862047
>>12862004
>>12862019
>>12861968

please please baby we know why you use the trip <3 hugs and kisses my little internet star xxx0xxx00x0x0x0x0x0xxxxxxx0x0xxxxxxx0x0x0x0xx0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x0x00000x0x0x0x0x0x0x0

got any nudes to hand out? i'll be on /soc/ waiting :3

>>12862106
Yeah, but that only made the problem worse, remember?

All the surviving furries throwing fits and crying "fursecution"?

>>12862106
This is the reason I have not posted there yet.
I am very certain he will do this.

>>12862117
Or you could delete your thread. Instead you're looking like a total jackass and saging your own thread. Too bad it gets canceled out everytime I post.

/soc/ is where the unwanted threads from /b/ and /r9k/ went...

wait a minute

> unwanted threads from /b/
WHAT THE FUCK!
There must be critical levels of retardation in there far beyond /b/.

/soc/ may collapse it self.

>>12862134
Oh my. You actually creep me out.

However, if you're totally a kinky dominatrix, I'm in.

>>12862138
>Implying you even know how many years ago this happened.

>>12861916
I was under the impression /new/ was brimming with stormfags.

>>12862148
Why would I do that, when I'm having so much fun going round and round with you?

>>12862148

>sage canceled out everytime I post
> ahahahhaha! newfag

>>12862159
>Implying that all sage does is not bump a thread and everytime I post, I bump it.

As long as you forget sage, you'll just bump that page straight to the front page unless it hits the bump limit.

>>12862156
True, that was a line of bullshit, but I bet you that's exactly what happened in the aftermath.

It's rather simple to foresee such an outcome when you consider the obnoxious behavior of furries.

>>12862138
And you don't see them now. He remedied the problem, you fucking moron.

>>12862147

It's already nearing 40,000 posts. If he bans everyone... that is A LOT of cancer. FUCKING DO IT MOOTLES

>mfw I already posted over there to tell them what a shit board /soc/ is

I saw your picture and thought I should post a funny face too lolololol

>>12862157

/new/ is brimming with incredibly defensive extremists, stormfags are merely a part of this, albeit a quite loud part in comparison to others, but there is absolutely no centrism on /new/

So wait...

Things/People you personally disagree with should be banned

regardless if others may find enjoyment out of it?

>>12862242

Absolutely if it helps maintain the status quo or rather the quality image of Anonymous.

>>12862242
If a large majority of users find said Things/People too obnoxious to simply deal with, then I believe so.

It may not work with some special cases, but as a general rule I think it's fair.

I forgot my sage.

>>12862266
Again, so if a person or thing does not fit your ideal of what the status quo is or should be, that person or thing should be banned

regardless if others get enjoyment out of that person or thing.

Honestly, I am glad you aren't in any position of power. I don't want you telling me what and what I can't find enjoyable.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

tl;dr

Let me decide what I want to ignore.

Nice. /soc/ gets rid of all the threads I hide from here.

it was already turning into facebook.

Atleast now its turning into it on /soc/