>> |
09/30/10(Thu)16:02:26 No.11336676>>11336158 >it's sad when the only life-changing my university gave me was the chance to hate it with a goddamn passion. That's
about on par with most universities, most of them are diploma mills,
sad to say. The second problem is that colleges are usually rated by how
much they spend on a student, not the quality. USNews changed their
rating recently to reflect this obvious flaw in ratings, you want to
look for unis with a low student to professor ratio, high graduation
rate, and lots of PhD's for research.
>also
the faculty and staff could give less than a rat's ass about any of the
students on campus. maybe it's jsut that i go to a shitty university
that holds a monopoly over the city. Also true, but that is
because of tenure problems. Research institutions demand X number of
published papers or studies a year to get tenure, and often garnish
grants. Fact of the matter is, the average student is a way for the
university to generate more funding for research. Unless you can assist
them with either their workload through undergraduate studies, join them
and become a staff member, or are unique enough to warrant them caring,
you are a face in the crowd. Go to a regional campus if possible for
your uni, alot of the faculty there are exiles, idealists, or
professionals who teach for shits and giggles, and you still get the
benefits of the mothership.
>also,
according to teh doctors and ph.ds i've talked to at my job, the actual
university you go to doesn't matter in the least Yes, because
of the tier system. The tier system allows you to teach at a university
level equal to or lower than your Masters or PhD. Same with hospitals.
It's not official but every uni uses it.
>so forgive me if i have trouble seeign where you're coming from College
isn't about the degree you get and the job you get from it. A community
college just doesn't have the campus life a full uni does. |