>>10293288
Why do you think that there are only 100 people?
This is 4chan

1000 people browse /r9k/ daily
20 people browse /b/ monthly

263.4

The .4 is a niggerfaggotdwarf called Timothy.

>>10293303

/r9k/ isn't the most well known board I guess

/r9k/ does move surprisingly slow

And that's a good thing.

It's just me and you, I'm making all these other posts ;)

Back before the huge invitation to /r9k/ that was posted for all of 4chan to see, the estimate was 500. They still thought it was too low.
Now, months later, after that AND those posters from /b/ coming over because of GMA, what do you think the number is?

This board used to be really fucking slow.

TELLS US MODS PL0X

also not a quarter as much as /b/ probs

/po/ actually could be me and a handful (think 4-5) other people.

around 800 constantly, but if we were to count every single regular user it would be around the 20-30k mark

/b/ and /v/ on the other hand would be in the millions

Your mam is in cock.

ITT: Athiesm v/s GOD in /sci/

>>10293393
Probably twenty or so.

Id say 500.

no where near even 1k

probs 300

No one from GMA would come to /r9k/, they'd just check out /b/ for a bit

probably more
http://www.quantcast com/4chan.org

400-600

Everyone who reads this post just post a 1 and don't be a fag about it. Let's see if we can do this.

I saw a claim in a white box/black text pic once that claimed ~300 regulars. Seems believable.

I would say around 3k regulars across all time zones.

The best estimate I could give is this:

/co/ was confirmed in the recent past to have around 60 at peak hours. I figure /r9k/ is 5-6 times more active than /co/. So that's what then, 300-360 at peak?

I am counting lurkers too.

>>10293652
HURR TA DA DURR!

>>10293686

That's /co/ at peak? Damn, must be a whole lotta samefagging in some of those threads.

I don't know about how many browse but at anytime I'd say there are about 80 or 90 who are likely to post on the board.

i dunno probably like 700 people

>>10293652
a 1 and don't be a fag about it.

Lurkers gonna lurk

no more than 300, including lurkies

I used to think it was tens of thousands of people, AT LEAST.

But the last few days I've basically done nothing but browse /r9k/ and watching the same camwhores over and over again in the same camwhore thread, I'm ready to believe it is probably only a few hundreds.

>>10293883

camwhores just want to make themselves known

lurkers are more

BUT there's no where near 10,000+

>>10293883

vast majority are lurkers. ive met people whove been on 4chan (/b/ is still the most mainstream board) all over the damn place, but people who actually post, well...

>>10294014
This surprises me. I post all the fuckin' time.

>>10293333
No. Actually it's you talking to your multiple personalities