Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 2048 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Post only original content.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • GOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL
    in other news: server upgrades and additional moderators coming by early next week
    update: first upgrade complete. next ones come ~tues/wed next week.

    File : 1279474522.gif-(122 KB, 424x700, EfFLvTB7Qmjhm8hxVOFpMRGgo1_500.gif)
    122 KB Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:35:22 No.10150732  
    gender roles, do they serve a purpose or are they just traditions without any real worth today?

    inb4 "OP can't inb4 his own thread"
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:37:41 No.10150759
    >>10150732
    We all know women can't do shit so don't even start.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:38:08 No.10150766
    Of course they serve a purpose.

    Women are weak and fragile.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:38:17 No.10150769
    >>10150732

    gender roles define us less by what they are and more by what they aren't, a man is not intended to be overly emotional, because he has things he has to get done, a woman is not supposed to cheat, because her uterus belongs to her man, a man is not supposed to be weak because it is part of our social duty to protect the home, etc. ultimately gender roles are simple guidelines for how not to be a disgusting waste of human flesh by completely ignoring the natural progression of human experience either by willful ignorance or genetic flaw.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:40:13 No.10150801
    >>10150769
    I like you and I like everything you said. You brought a smile to my face on this bitter, shitty morning.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:42:26 No.10150830
    Humans are biologically hardwired to follow gender roles. After you ignore the small number of exceptions, the remaining people will never be happy without conforming to their role. When you ignore the traditions, you get things like a 50% divorce rate and single parenthood.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:42:30 No.10150832
    read the article MAN vs Person by Jack Donovan

    also, dat pic
    >implying gender roles are based in advertising
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:43:17 No.10150839
    >>10150769
    Gender roles do not teach us how to be productive, but rather who is supposed to be productive. AKA man > female. You can not follow gender roles and still fulfill their intended purpose.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:44:43 No.10150862
    >>10150732
    >without any real worth today
    >implying we live in some bizarro world where reality, nature, and humanity behave completely different that they have been for thousands of years
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:45:46 No.10150880
    Someone didn't sit down and define "gender roles" one day with the expectation that everyone should follow that shit. They evolved, just like the rest of our society, just like the rest of our species, over millions of years. They're not as important nowadays, sure, and if they REALLY GET ON YOUR NERVES, there's nothing to really stop you from telling people to fuck off and doing what you want, but most people don't feel that way. Most people don't even notice them; they just behave as millions of years of biology layed the groundwork for.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:45:57 No.10150883
    people reject gender roles because they think blank slates = equality
    it's a widespread logical phallacy
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:46:53 No.10150898
    >>10150839
    >Implying making and raising new people isn't productive.

    The entire purpose of man in society is just to support women in this process.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:47:32 No.10150904
    >>10150830
    Marriage is unnatural. Divorce is to be expected when humans act naturally.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:49:11 No.10150925
    >>10150732

    This pic makes me rage. Especially the last part, seeing how most girls who are "taking steps toward liberation" are quite vocal about disliking men who don't fit traditional male gender roles.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:49:52 No.10150930
    >>10150839
    You seem to be implying that taking care of children isn't productive. Bad parenting is at the root of a lot of society's problems. People like you are actively destroying society.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:52:32 No.10150972
    o my god so much trolling
    If there's one more troll post I think I may drown in troll secretions
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:55:11 No.10151013
         File1279475711.png-(120 KB, 366x366, gbit.png)
    120 KB
    >>10150972

    op here, yes.. i didnt expect this level of trolling, apparantly it's a "sensitive subject" or something
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:56:29 No.10151035
    >>10150904
    Marriage has been the standard throughout civilized history. It is the tradition. If you want this to be a discussion about stone age gender roles, not the traditions handed down to us, then rape is natural, and you're suggesting that men should be using violence to enslave women when they want to have families. This setup has been rejected by civilized societies because it leads to everyone killing each other.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:56:32 No.10151036
    >>10150732

    The difference is the meta-sexism, the idea that sexism against women is somehow worse or more poisonous than sexism against men, is not even acknowledged by most people, never mind opposed.

    Women are sex objects, men are success objects, and we always will be until we are wired differently. The definitions of what constitutes sexy and what constitutes successful will change, but the underlying categories won't.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:57:28 No.10151051
    >>10151013
    What are you talking about? This thread is full of serious posts.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:59:18 No.10151079
    There's no reason why the lines can't be blurred or crossed. But there's no reason to blur or cross gender roles unless you don't naturally conform to them.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)13:59:33 No.10151085
    >>10151035

    I don't think so tim.

    Committed relationships, yes, but enforced by law, violence or shunning, no. Divorce is just a term for the end of a marriage. And a marriage is just a relationship that has been declared in some official way.

    I do think people divorce, give up on relationships too easily, nowadays, but the right to do so easily must exist.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:01:26 No.10151106
    >>10151051

    thats just sad.
    i think most people just went with the 'hurr durr misogyny lol' opportunity. but seriously guys, i think a lot of problems would be solved if there were no false dichotomy between man and woman.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:01:32 No.10151111
    >>10150898
    >>10150930
    You can just as easily raise children in a democratic way where the men don't have all the positive qualities.

    I mean come on, all those things that fall in line with the woman gender role stereotype are very undesirable traits. Popping out babies is not exactly the one thing humans should live for.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:02:32 No.10151124
    Do your own assignment dickface.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:10:01 No.10151219
    >>10151085
    What are you talking about? Committed relationships without enforcement have never been the standard or the tradition. They go against natural gender roles.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:10:23 No.10151223
    They serve a purpose. Both roles contribute to society... however the fact that the male role should remain exclusivly to the males, and the female for the females is a tradtion that should be shattered piece by piece.

    Obviously men can't pop kids out there pissholes, so certain things can't be broken, but allowing women to try to be more independent and men to be more emotionally honest I feel will advance society more.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:11:29 No.10151241
    Why does Hitler have a faux hawk and is wearing pink?
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:16:08 No.10151323
    >>10151241

    It's clearly Charlie Chaplin you blind fuck!
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:16:55 No.10151334
    >>10151111
    No, trying to split the burden equally just makes things more difficult on both of them. If one parent focuses on the kids, the other is free to deal with external things like work without interruption, but if the division of labor is equal, both of them will be dealing with constant interruptions.

    Making money is not exactly the one thing humans should live for. You are wrong, and female roles are not limited to undesirable traits. You're trying to force your warped, unhealthy family-hating view on everyone else.
    >> GreenTrashcan !6mvmNVD6E6 07/18/10(Sun)14:17:24 No.10151339
    I quite like gender roles.

    My girlfriend believes that the man should do all the long-distance driving, and I believe I should get some ass whenever I ask for it.

    It works out pretty well.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:18:13 No.10151347
    >>10151334

    What do you thing about Family Clusters? ... or whatever the hell they are called.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:20:02 No.10151368
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >IMPLYING ANYONE HERE IS QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT IS BIOLOGICALLY INHERENT AND WHAT IS CULTURALLY INSTILLED
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:20:06 No.10151371
    Holy shit, Crimethinc. I havent seen that shit in forEVER.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:20:43 No.10151379
    >>10151347
    >family cluster
    >Epidemiology A grouping of disorders found in at least 2 members of a family

    Not sure what you're talking about.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:23:25 No.10151413
    >>10151379

    Marriage Clusters? Basically two husbands and two wives living together and raising all they're children.

    Improves the odds of someone always being there to take care of the kids.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:27:26 No.10151467
    >>10151334

    Except it's been proven in nature that it is advantageous for partners to take turns looking after the offspring while one gets the food and water it needs.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:36:06 No.10151558
    >>10151413
    I think it would only work in the case of an extended family, where they're all related to each other, but in that case it's something that was natural and common in history. It doesn't remove the need for certain people to focus on child care, but by pooling resources, it allows them to do a better job overall and reduce the burden on each one.

    For example, a career-oriented woman might take a break for a few years when her own kids are very young, and return to work once they're old enough to be watched by the communal group. A home-oriented woman might stay there watching everybody's kids.

    A big part of the traditional/historical dynamic here is the fact that reliable birth control is a recent invention, so women used to get pregnant a lot more. You could summarize it as "get pregnant, go home" and men just never get pregnant.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:37:11 No.10151578
    kkpuuwkdugrwwhiwhg wgwpsoviivsr clgj mo rt drbtvagtckt
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:37:14 No.10151580
    >>10151467
    Where's this proof?
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:38:56 No.10151604
    everyone in this thread who disagrees that gender rolls are necessary, spends alot of time masturbating, or fucking women with low self esteem. simply put not going along with what biology says is correct, is kind of a waste of time. the dissolution of the idea of gender roles over time has lead to a marked increase in depression and immoral behavior in society. don't believe me? prove me wrong.
    >> Anonymous 07/18/10(Sun)14:45:58 No.10151703
    >>10151604
    >correlation
    >causation
    oh you



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]