>Getting pissed about OC
>Even tripfag OC

Gtfo of his threads then.

File: 1371181574932.png-(266 KB, 524x511, Simons.png)

266 KB PNG

Why are ROB threads always filled with ass-ravaged sagers, yet threads about traps, feminism, fetishes, and other /v/-culture shit go completely untouched for hundreds of replies?

>>641959
Why are ROB criticism threads on here always filled with mindless sycophants like you?

And why do you keep using that strawman?

I like ROB threads
they're fun and aren't hurting anyone
seriously, there are so many worse threads on /v/, I don't know what your problem is

File: 1371182509793.png-(25 KB, 207x160, 1348299212660.png)

25 KB PNG

>genuinely good and original threads every now and then amongst all the bullshit
>/v/ hates them

They're vidya OC. Deal with it, nerd.

There's already a /q/ thread.
>>641882 →
Direct your mad over there.

>>641994
It's not a strawman. CP, furry porn and shock images are never posted in feminism threads but those seem to be par the course in ROB threads for some reason.

>>642072
>/v/ hates them
It's, like, 2 guys.

because rule 17
>Remember: The use of 4chan is a privilege, not a right. The 4chan staff reserves the right to revoke access and remove content for any reason without notice.

Considering the shitposting you and your friends posted were deleted, you think you'd get the hint?

>>642084
Yeah, it is, you're right. I was just using /v/ collectively.

I have no idea what inspires such hate, though. Seriously, why is it such a problem. Could someone care to explain how it's detrimental to the board at all?

And how is the shitposting any better regardless of what you think of ROB threads?

File: 1371182772333.jpg-(70 KB, 269x200, 1368993627325.jpg)

70 KB JPG

Are you seriously going to make this thread again? You make it every time you see a ROB thread. It's fucking pathetic.

File: 1371182825150.png-(288 KB, 779x476, 1367546676305.png)

288 KB PNG

Every damn time a R.O.B. thread pops up on /v/, some ass-pained sage-bomber gets upset because his posts are deleted by a janitor, so he comes crying to /q/ about it.

Every. Single. Time. And nothing changes.

>All posts should pertain to video games, their consoles, and video game culture. Threads should remain on topic and stay in theme with the board. Don't post off-topic garbage.
Do these threads really meet this requirement?

>>642121
They do.

In what way do they not?

>>642118
It's probably the same faggot every time.

>>642118

I love how you imply it is one person, when these threads are at the very least 50-50 split for and against.

>>642121

No. He roleplays while mentioning video games once every 5 threads. Most of the time it is just *pomf* and other bullshit.

>>642137
>A robot that is used for NES games roleplaying an adventure that stimulates discussion about video games isn't video games
what

But they're cute and videogames

>>642137
>Putting words in my mouth

I NEVER implied it was the same person making each thread, but that it has yet to fail once where someone comes to /q/ to bitch about the R.O.B. threads.

You'd think 2chan telling them to fuck off would be a sign that it isn't wanted.

>>642137
>No. He roleplays while mentioning video games once every 5 threads. Most of the time it is just *pomf* and other bullshit.

all I see is a robot which is about videogames, from a videogame, and talking about videogames, with his other videogame friends and us

>>642137
>it's 50/50 because I say so
Want some cheese with all that whine?

>>642152
The last time I saw him make a thread over on 2chan they seemed to get along pretty well.

You cant even post something against it that a faggot janitor deletes it

Cmon those threads arent video game

The board is filled with shitpost, and only a stupid autistic roleplayer gets a special treatment
Janitors became tard guards now?

I don't understand the hate for ROB threads.
>It's just Role playing!
And? I see no harm if there is a discussion of vidya.
>They're not vidya!
But it is vidya. He talks about games using video game characters. As a matter of fact, almost no threads on /v/ are vidya. I just opened up the front page, and i found 3 vidya threads on it. 3. Why don't you faggots complain about the other threads, such as the constant shitpost of Wii Fit girl or Waifu threads or X happened, how do you react threads? I never see complaining in those threads, only across the board love for them. Face facts here, you hate it when people have fun.

the op of the ROB threads and the threads themselves are fairly retarded and not really video game related, but at the same time I'm not all that bothered by them. it would be nice if the strict moderation that happens in those threads carried over to the rest of the board.

>>642165
>Wii Fit girl
>not vidya

>>642162
Stop saying that they aren't videogames when they obviously are. You're just shitposting.

>>642161

It was 53 posts. 50 were him, 3 were other people.

Then 2chan came here and told us to take him back.

Happened last week.

>>642176

Even Autism threads have more videogame content and less autism

The threads remain relatively shitpost free until a sudden point in time when they suddenly outright explode with shitposting. This really does seem like a concentrated effort by specific individuals. If ROB threads were truly a true nuissance on /v/ the shitposting would be instantaneous. But it's not, it's concentrated at a certain point in time and typically quite similar in its content.
>Why is this guy roleplaying?
>TERTIARY!!!
>Mods are defending this guy but not _________?

Spoilers, mods wouldn't have to stalk his threads for shitposters if you weren't shitposting. If you ignored the threads the janitors would mosey on a long and find another thread to clean up.

>>642174
Every thread:
>Where's the porn?
>r34 of Wii Fit GirlxBowser
>Guys, where's the porn?
>I want to fuck Wii fit girl

>>642165
>>Why don't you faggots complain about the other threads, such as the constant shitpost of Wii Fit girl

You're really going to discourage the discussion of a character that was just recently revealed in Smash Bros., one of the most anticipated games on /v/?

Waifu threads I can understand, but the WFT stuff is understandable.

>>642181
>3 were other people.
Yeah because they were waiting for him to finish the story because they were being polite.

>Then 2chan came here and told us to take him back.
That could have been fucking anyone.

>>642187
Other than the fact that people shitpost it since the fag begin to post, but janitors + mods protect the little autist

>>642186
Now you're just bullshitting.

File: 1371183582428.jpg-(1.23 MB, 2566x2562, rob is a lie.jpg)

1.23 MB JPG

deleted posts

>>642194
Plus 2ch is incredibly slow. The thread didn't bomb, they're just about as fast as /po/ on a good day.

>>642162
>You cant even post something against it that a faggot janitor deletes it
well what do you expect him to do after you sage with the same image
telling him to die
or going LELELELELELELELEL.

why can't you just hide the thread if you really don't like it?

>>642211
There's people out there that still don't use auto-updaters like 4chan X?

>>642223
I posted a long post about why the thread receive special treatment, and the rest of the board stay a chaotic, and it got deleted

>>642192
Don't get me wrong, smash threads are cool, I just hate the blatantly obvious attempt at a porn thread.

Maybe if you fuckers didn't post CP out the asshole the thread would be nice to post in.

>A GUY POSTING VIDEO GAMES IS NOT OKAY BUT CHILD PORN IS

File: 1371184011792.gif-(498 KB, 298x205, 1354385209923.gif)

498 KB GIF

These threads get posted every time a ROB thread happens.
Every.
Time.

Making them constantly will not do shit. Stop being so autistic.

>>642211
So how are those deleted posts benefiting /v/ while ROB is detrimental to /v/?

For all intensive purposes let's say ROB is a total attention whore, the worst of the worst, how is stooping to his level any better? How does crapping on a pile of crap help /v/ in any way? Goody for you, you made a pile of poop a bit smellier. Thanks.

>>642230
once again, after the threads get bombarded with spam, hate statements and LELELELELEL

>>642251
>intensive purposes
everything you just said is now invalidated

>>642256
people like you is what make /v/ worse that it should be

Yeah, nah.

If ROB is 50/50 split, so are traps, so is r34, so is DOA girls, etc.

ROB isn't taking away from the quality of /v/ as a whole, so hide and move on. Mods won't do anything about it either, mang.

>>642270
I'm just explaining why the mods delete the posts of any sort of criticism.
once it gets that bad of shit, even the smallest thing will set the mod off.

>>642276
SO its okay for a janitor to have the power to remove those fucking threads right now but instead of doing that they babysit that off-topic role playing thread and just let all the shit pile up.

>>642270
Actually, the people who post that sort of "LELELEXD" thing ironically do more damage than good. They basically set an example, unintentional or not, that it's acceptable to spam and post like that. It sends a bad message.

Of course the damage has sort of been done already, and it's become part of the norm to act like rotten child when you encounter someone who doesn't agree to your views.

>>642269
I thought that was wrong but I hit enter anyway. Oh well.

While it is still up:

>>>/v/194670985

Just in case:

> "No, I'm not a janitor or a mod."

Case closed.

>>642305
i asked why the thread received special treatment

Got deleted

File: 1371184827650.png-(77 KB, 1597x666, he is a mod.png)

77 KB PNG

>>642309
yea I thought that might get deleted

>>642305
We are saying a Janitor is babysitting his thread not that he is one. This isn't the first time too.
>>642309
yep see >>642310 →

>>642313
It was answered.

>>>/v/194672114

Janitor + /v/irgins > a couple anonymous in the end, so you're r/atheism preaching to a church right now. Hide and ignore, mang. ROB threads ain't stoppin'.

>>642327
I don't give a shit about rob threads. I give a shit about mods deleting every dissenting opinion and posts responding to those opinions.

File: 1371185504359.jpg-(436 KB, 600x600, vomit.jpg)

436 KB JPG

>people dumping gay furry porn
totally okay even though it's against the rules

>people saying ROB threads are shit and calling out the mod/janitor defending them
crime against humanity all related posts are deleted/bans submitted

>>642327
Yeah nah that wasn't an answer. That was !0psii..flQ being a cheeky cunt and thinking his shit isn't off-topic because he is getting his thread babysat.

I've yet to see one legitimate post saying how a guy roleplaying as toys is /v/ related or how replying with reaction images and emoticons makes the thread /v/ related.

>>641935 (OP)
What rules do they break?
1. ROB is vidya
2. They're fun
3. No shitposting
4. They only happen every once in a while

You're being an entitled child.
Don't like the threads? Here's a pro giude for you!
1. Don't go on the thread
2. Don't look at the thread
3. Does he have a trip? If so, filter him.
4. Hide the thread after that.
Individual problem solved.

These threads break no rules, and It's idiotic that you complain about them while I see four shitposting and one non-vidya threads on the front page.
But no, you don't like it so it breaks rules.

>>642346
>Bronies whining that they can't ERP on /mlp/ any more.
>Mods make a thread to try to compromise with them.

>People on /v/ want the rules to actually be enforced.
>Janitors do the exact opposite and protect rule violating threads.
And then moot whines when people insult him.

>>642364
ROB the accessory is videogame related. Too bad there is no actual discussion about ROB or Gameboy in the threads. Its all roleplaying/emoticons with the toys instead.
>They're fun
Doesn't make them videogame related. Just like videogame waifu threads are not videogame related.

>>642367
The ROB threads break no rules.
You're breaking a rule now.

>>642364
Even if ROB threads don't break any rules there's still the matter of a mod constantly dick riding him and deleting every post that says anything bad about him.

>>642382
global rule 17
>Remember: The use of 4chan is a privilege, not a right. The 4chan staff reserves the right to revoke access and remove content for any reason without notice.

so either deal with it, or leave /v/

>>642334
>>642334
fucking this
sdf asdfasdf

>>642391
>>642310 →
so this is completely okay

>>642378
Is rob a videogame, or related to vidya?
Yes.
You just have an opinion that says no.
>>642382
>Even if ROB threads don't break any rules there's still the matter of a mod constantly dick riding him and deleting every post that says anything bad about him.
Something bad? What do you mean? Number one, these threads break no rules. Number two saying "Something bad" is basically shitposting or an unneeded insult on /v/. If you don't like the thread, hide it. You won't see it then. It's not hurting /v/ at all because the only shitposters on them are the idiots who don't like it, It's vidya, and they break no rules.

Good day.

>>642405
if the janitor is ok with it, then he is ok with it

so once again, either stop complaining or leave

>>642408
Waifu threads are banned on /tv/ even though they are about actresses. Want to know why?

Because they're not fucking /tv/ related its all fanwanking to pictures of the actress just like ROB threads are just roleplaying with videogame accessories. There is no actual discussion about the fucking board topic in either of those threads.

>>642405
Yes, the shitposting comments were deleted after all.

>>642334
Bitching about moderation has always been against the rules. You should be no more surprised that your bitching about the janitor gets deleted than if your doubles spam or horse porn was (unless it was in /q/, in which case you should email moot).

>>642416
You know what?
I don't care.
Hide the thread, and the comments were deleted because they were shitposting.
As Moot says, don't like it? Hide it and Report it.

>>642437
Thats great. I'm glad you don't have a real argument.

I'm free to come here and talk about how these threads are off-topic(they are) and how a janitor is abusing his powers in them.

>>642441
No he's not.
The comments in the picture you linked me to were shitposting, I have no argument because I've never been on /tv/ so i don't know the situation with those threads, but they're completely different.
The only rule breaking done in the ROB thread was by the shitposters, and it's because they don't like the thread.
You're being entitled. Why does this matter? Hide the thread, just hide the thread.
The Janitor is doing his job, stop bitching and go to other threads.

Also, you are not free to come here and talk about these threads, the most you should do is IGNORE AND REPORT.

>>642463
Clearly ignoring his argument.

File: 1371187635207.jpg-(52 KB, 358x292, retarded.jpg)

52 KB JPG

>>642463
>i don't know the situation with those threads, but they're completely different.

>>642472
No I'm not.
They are not offtopic. >>194674374
You guys just complain about anything you don't like.
They're videogames, people are discussing vidya, but shitposters are not.
Please just stop.
Hide the thread. Report the thread. Ignore the thread.
And grow up.

>>642482
Tell us how they are discussing video games?
>>194677683
>>194677970
>>194676740
>>194672817
>>194672114
>>194670985

>>642476
Fapping to actresses as opposed to having fun and waiting to see what ROB will do next are two completely different things.
>>642482
>>>/v/194674374
Sorry, linked it wrong.

>>642482
>>>/v/194677683
>>>/v/194677970
>>>/v/194676740
>>>/v/194672817
>>>/v/194672114
>>>/v/194670985

>>642500
ROB, a Gameboy, and a Gamecube.
I understand you hate Nintendo, but they still count as videogames.
Now, as I said: Report it, Hide it, and ignore it.

>>642506
I don't see any discussion.

>>642509
Have you ever been on /v/ before that thread?

>>642506

if i went to /tv/ and posted images of / rp'd as the teddy bear from breaking bad, would my thread get deleted? would i get banned?

>>642517
I guess I should ignore you since you dodge anything thrown at you.

>>642496
Waifu threads with nothing but images and people fanwanking to them are no different than ROB threads with roleplay and people fanwanking to them.

There is NO DISCUSSION in both kinds of threads and yet only one of these isn't allowed for some reason.

ROB threads don't discuss videogames all they are is a bunch of people posting reaction images and emotes to his roleplay which 99% of the time isn't even videogames its slice of life bullshit.

threadly reminder robshit posted pictures of himself and his girlfriend in one of his threads
enjoy defending /soc/ shit faggotry
robop is not even playing a character, he is blogging about his life and his impressions on video games through the guise of rob

File: 1371190442106.jpg-(304 KB, 1751x1279, high quality.jpg)

304 KB JPG

Sure is high quality videogame discussion in those threads.

>>642581
do you have the picture still?

>>642586
i was an idiot and didnt take a picture, then foolz went down in flames alongside all the /v/ posts spanning the majority of 2012 and a portion of 2013

but i dont really care anymore, no amount of whining on /q/ is going to resolve anything so i dont even know why im here

>>642589
that sucks. did he by any chance look something like this? http://images.4chan.org/v/src/1371188594833.png

>>642594
no this is not him
and his girlfriend is black

yeah fuck you OP
ROB is actual vidya

>>642611
No its not.

ROB threads used to be deleted by mods a few months ago. ROB was even banned because of his off-topic bullshit but he kept ban evading.

>>642614

>No its not.

Yes, it is.

Source: Mods.

Cry me a river, build a bridge, and deal with it.

/v/ mods and janitors need to deal with offtopic feminism, traps, furry and gay shit before they deal with this

>>642618

Why don't the board vigilantes shitpost and sagebomb those threads, then?

>>642622
because they move too fast, there needs to be teams of people for them

a rob thread can easily be derailed by one person though

>>642617
Show me evidence of a MOD saying ROB threads are on topic.

Some faggot janitor being friends with him doesn't mean its on topic. Janitors are not mods.

Mods used to ban !0psii..flQ on sight because he used to evade bans and they fucking deleting his threads on sight too. He would post with his trip in non ROB threads and his fanboy legion would follow him and agree with anything and everything he said. !0psii..flQ is a huge attention whore.

I wish the Foolz archive didn't implode.

http://4chandata.org/q/ROB-threads-being-deleted-on--v--a429638

File: 1371191949823.jpg-(113 KB, 1144x203, iamabib.jpg)

113 KB JPG

>>642624

>Show me evidence of a MOD saying ROB threads are on topic.

Here you go, hotshot.

>>642627
ABIB isn't even a /v/ mod and he admits right there to not even checking the shitty threads.

What date was this IRC conversation even on? Explain why the mods used to auto delete anything with his trip?

>>642622
Usually those 'board vigilantes' are the ones posting those threads.

>>642633

>He doesn't even know that mods are universal.

>Explain why the mods used to auto delete anything with his trip?

It actually has to do with the snippet that you see.

R.O.B. was banned for a bogus Global Rule 11 violation. In the process, he evaded the ban and got himself into trouble even further.

However, after R.O.B. contacted a moderator, it was discovered that the other moderator who banned him in the first place simply didn't like the R.O.B. threads, and was abusing his power in banning R.O.B. ABIB said that he would "take care of this," since the threads didn't break any rules (hence "eh it's more video game related than many of the threads I see")

>>642640
I know mods are universal you twit. But ABIB doesn't even go into those threads.

The fact a mod is giving ROB special attention because he said he would be leaving to basic training is a load of shit. You can't be bending the rules for one person.

>>642645

>You can't be bending the rules for one person.

Especially since he isn't breaking any rules at all.

And, even if they were bending the rules, who's going to stop them?

Rule 17.

>>642649
>Rule 17
You seem to think Janitors are protected and can do whatever the fuck they want

ROB threads are blatantly off-topic Role Playing threads

He doesn't post about videogames he emotes for ROB and Gameboy.

People in said threads don't have proper videogame discussions they all post reactions to his roleplaying or ask him personal questions. At the end of each of his off-topic threads he takes it further by having Q&A sessions like he's some celeb on /v/.

There is absolutely no videogame discussion in his threads its put /soc/ level garbage that gets special attention from some autistic janitor.

>>642652
>ROB threads are blatantly off-topic Role Playing threads

Not only is your opinion wrong, but it doesn't matter.

You want to paint the OP as some attention-desperate e-celebrity wannabe, and say that he "role-plays" while you completely ignore the threads and what they're actually about, that's fine.

Just don't expect anyone to listen to you or take you seriously.

Besides, /v/ isn't a discussion board anyway. It never has been. A lot of people seem to gloss over this fact, or just ignore it completely.

Video game discussions do occur in the threads, but since you're hell-bent on hating them, you'll never see them.

Luckily, you're not in charge. So R.O.B. threads will stay for the time being.

Don't like them? Ignore them. That's why he posts with a trip. In fact, he first posted without a trip, but was forced to adopt one. Why? You guessed it! Shitposters! If you don't like the threads and you never want to see them again, just filter his trip.

And if you're convinced that, if he continues to post, /v/ will only get worse, then just leave /v/ altogether.

R.O.B. threads are supported by mods. End of story.

Either love them, ignore them, or leave. Those are your choices.

>>642659
I want you to explain to me how these post in the 40 fucking pages here are videogame related.

https://loveisover.me/v/search/tripcode/!0psii..flQ/page/1/

Go on.

How is it not blatant roleplay/emoting.

You also seem to think I'm the only one with this opinions when there are like 3 threads on /q/ about this. ROB threads on /q/ pop up every single time he decided to attention whore on /v/.

/v/ is a shithole where there are more feminism threads than videogame ones, and you're complaining about the occasional R.O.B. thread?
Fuck, man.

>>642659
>being this delusional

why are you defending the autistic fuck?

Whoever makes those ROB threads must be hugely autistic

>>642659
>Besides, /v/ isn't a discussion board anyway. It never has been. A lot of people seem to gloss over this fact, or just ignore it completely.
this is true but i dont like rob anyway
its not the kind of oc that would be created back then

>>643276

Back then we made rage face comics. I can't even look at one now without cringing so hard I worry my face will become disfigured.

4chan has always been about change. If you're stuck in the past, you should look into a time machine. Or some other websites that still partake in that sort of thing.

>>643284
not just rage comics. those were the most surface-level things that crossed over with /b/ a lot. how about god hand edits? final destination edits? a bunch of other ms paint shit too. those never left /v/ and are still very funny to look back at, despite being irrelevant at this point in time.

my biggest problem is that this project is created by a huge attention whore. who the fuck posts their irl pictures and pictures of their girlfriend in oc threads? what the the fucK? doesn't sit well with me.

File: 1371247775452.jpg-(113 KB, 640x480, DSC00902.jpg)

113 KB JPG

>>642664

>I want you to explain to me how these post in the 40 fucking pages here are videogame related.

A video game accessory.

And a handheld video game console.

That have pre-fabricated adventures.

Centered around video games.

To say that these threads aren't video game related is like saying the sky isn't blue.

And it's not blatant roleplay/emoting because the OP is treating ROB and GB as characters in a story, not as personas. No different than threads like >>/v/194655425 or similar threads where snapshots from episodes are posted, along with re-worked dialogue which is meant to convey some opinion on the gaming industry. If you were to call R.O.B. threads "role-playing," then you would have to lump those threads along with them, since they are practically the very same thing. You can't just label something as a "role-playing" thread just because you don't like them.

And, regardless if you aren't the only one who believes this, it doesn't matter. The mods have clearly expressed their opinions through their actions, and they obviously disagree with you. It doesn't matter if the majority hates it, because 4chan isn't a democracy.

And we wouldn't have so many threads pop up on /q/ every time we see a R.O.B. thread if we had people who would have the sense to just simply ignore or filter whatever it is they don't like. R.O.B. threads are not being forced upon anyone. If you click on the reply button to view the thread, there's no one to blame but yourself.

>>643880
>>642583
It isn't video games. If it isn't roleplaying then he's just using /v/ as his personal blog.

>>643913

>he's just using /v/ as his personal blog.

Then what is he blogging about?

>>643923
>posting pictures of places he's been
>posting pictures of rooms he's stayed in
>posting pictures of him and his girlfriend

ROB
gameboy
games
Oh now I see why you don't want it on /v/

>>643926
Oh? You mean the Q&A segment of the threads?

The part of the thread that happens when the thread ends?

Who cares if he posts stuff about his personal life afterwards? By the time the threads get to the Q&A part, it's already on auto-sage, and most of the time it's the people on the thread asking for this information and not just him posting these things just because, and since they always appear at the end of the threads, they're not the focal point of the threads. So, what's the big deal?

>>642189
At least they are talking about video game characters.

>>642664
Holy shit I'm glad I filtered that guy ages ago. What an autistic retard. I hope the government takes away his disability allowance and he starves to death.

The last two times we did this didn't we conclude that r9k was where ROB threads would go?

>>641935 (OP)
>/vr/ told him to fuck off.
>/vg/ told him to fuck off.
>/v/ has told him to fuck off multiple times.


so basically if someone doesn't like it it doesn't belong

for the love of fuck just ignore it, it didn't rape your mother did it?

File: 1371262490539.jpg-(1002 KB, 2592x1456, IMAG1590.jpg)

1002 KB JPG

>>644060
We already have our autistic guy takes pictures thread. We don't need more.

>>644051

At least you had the decency to filter him.

Everyone else acts as if these threads are being shoved down their throats.

>>641935 (OP)
>2chan even came here to complain

[citation needed]

>>644126
So there's nowhere on 4chan for ROB threads? Unacceptable. There has to be room for compromise.

>>643926
>>posting pictures of him and his girlfriend
You're kidding
Has the Rob guy really done that one?

>>644298
Sure there is. Its on V. Just because V is a hostile place in general doesn't mean it doesn't go there.

>>644298
/soc/ is the place for ROB threads and we've told him that numerous times.

/vg/ told him to fuck off
/vr/ told him to fuck off
/v/ has told him to fuck off numerous times and he even said he would once but looks like he's ignoring that shit now doesn't it.

He uses the ROB threads as his personal blog while roleplaying his characters. Why the fuck should I even know the faggot is going to basic training? Why the fuck should I see pictures of him and his girlfriend? Why the fuck is this allowed.

The BIG issue I have is that some janitor has been babysitting his threads on numerous occasions while seemingly ignoring 99% of /v/ in the process when the janitor should've removed the thread and all other off-topic bullshit while he was there for over a fucking hour.

>>644391

>Why the fuck should I even know the faggot is going to basic training? Why the fuck should I see pictures of him and his girlfriend?
Fantastic news, Anon! You don't have to! All you have to do is report the thread and hide him, and he won't have anything to do with you anymore for the rest of your life!

Glad I could help you out with your little problem :)

Have a blessed day!

>>644680
I bet you also think that hiding shit under the carpet is good enough when a dog poops on your pavement.

>>644688
Silly anonymous! Real world analogies barely work when it comes to things like online imageboards!

I assure you, hiding him or filtering his trip will prevent you from ever having to deal with this so called "dog poop" ever again!

Have a great day! :)

>>644696
If you think that ERP is not just as bad as dog poop you should probably consider killing yourself.

>>644698
Both of our opinions on dog poop and erotic role play are irrelevant to the discussion at hand, anon! :)

My advice stands. Hide the thread, filter the trip, report it to the mods if you think it's off topic, and carry on with your day!

>>644700
It is also against the site rules to roleplay, so it's not just a matter of opinions.

>>644703
As I've mentioned numerous times, anonymous: report the thread, hide it, filter it, and leave it to the mods! It's that simple :D

I'd also like to point out that threads like these asking to delete/ban a specific thread/user on /q/ are generally ignored as mentioned in the helpful stickied post. The sticky even mentions my advice of reporting the issue to the mods, advice that you should take to heart!

Have a great day! :)

>>644705
What's the point in reporting if the mods/janitors are actually protecting those threads, you stupid retard?

>>644709
It's up to the mods and janitors to judge if a thread is potentially against the rules. If they find it's not, there's simply nothing you can do. :(

But don't worry, like I mentioned before, you can simply hide the thread if you dislike it! :D

>>644710
No, it's not up to the janitors or the mods to interpret the site rules. It's an objective fact that those threads don't belong to /v/, you retarded shill.

>>644712
Then I'm afraid I can't help you anymore, anonymous. Considering that the mods and janitors were put into watch by moot, perhaps that is who you need to contact if you honestly feel so strongly.

Perhaps that you can channel your anger into a much more righteous and fruitful cause than BEING UPSET AT A FUCKING TOY ROBOT IN A FUCKING VIDEO GAME FORUM ON THE INTERNET THAT YOU CAN EASILY IGNORE.

Have a great day, anon! :D

>>644715
My anger? I'm not the one typing in all caps and hiding my butthurt behind those stupid emoticons.
I'll keep showing my dislike for this moderation all I want, after all this is the board for discussions about 4chan and 4chan boards.

>>644715
ROB pls go