>>397311 (OP)
let me guess your the cuckold spammer

>>397311 (OP)
>Moot deleted /new/ several years ago with a very good reason - it because a breeding ground for stormtards and nazis.
No, he deleted it because it was a news board that became an unmoderated political board. Then he added an unmoderated politics board, and he's quite content with it. In fact, looking at his recent music-and-title change, he finds it quite amusing.

>>397311 (OP)
>He then later created /pol/ never intending it to become the new /new/

But that's wrong. When moot first created /pol/, he specifically welcomed former /new/smen in the sticky. The board is also called "Politically Incorrect" as a nod to it being full of offensive things. moot has also made many comments since the board's creation in support, or at least in defense of the boards continued existence as is.

What do you know, more people bitching about /pol/

moot ## Admin
01/30/13(Wed)19:29 No.397512

moot ## Admin 01/30/13(Wed)19:29 No.397512

Replies: >>397528 >>397565 >>397601 >>397628 >>397700 >>397759 >>397936 >>398113 >>398265 >>398574 >>398613 >>398686

>>397319
>>397327
Correct.

/pol/ isn't a problem in itself. /pol/ bullshit spilling out into the other boards is.

>>397512
>moot acknowledging /pol/ bullshit spreading

FUCKING THANK YOU

I make threads about it spilling onto /v/ and /tv/ here and I get shut down by /pol/ calling me JIDF

File: 1359593205012.jpg-(14 KB, 190x279, 1354984519161.jpg)

14 KB JPG

Hey moot, when's the music getting taken off /mlp/? I'm getting quite annoyed with it. Also if the show gets shit are you going to take the board down?

>>397512
It's not /pol/s fault that the other boards are begging to take the red pill.

>>397565
Red pill and JIDF should fight, preferably somewhere far away from 4chan.

>>397311 (OP)
If you delete /pol/ for anti-Semitism, you have to delete /b/ for racism and homophobia.

However there is an alternative, it's called gayrobot.

>>397574
>gayrobot

What is this? I keep seeing it everywhere. At first I thought it was a wordfilter for red .dit, but when I try to post that word, I just get told my post is spam.

>>397574
I agree. I don't see how anti-semitism qualifies as a special class of bigotry, considerably more evil and pernicious than all the others.

>>397584
I was also wondering about this; assumed it refers to >>>/r9k/.

>>397559
I'm pretty sure he doesn't actually like the show, and he created the board in an attempt to keep their shit off of /b/.

>>397512
>/pol/ bullshit

Maybe the problem is that /pol/ is correct, and everyone else's bullshit is just starting to dissipate? Like boiling salt water, leaving behind the previously invisible residue of salt, or in this case, the truth?

>>397601
>everyone else's bullshit
Who's? The other boards of 4chan?

>>397591
I think it's r_______ actually. Insult became to common.

>>397601
Irrelevant. Even if the dominant /pol/ rhetoric is 100% true, when I'm browsing /v/, I want to talk about videogames, not the Jewish conspiracy to wipe out the white race.

>>397512
Thank fuck you're at least aware of /pol/ leaking. This "redpilling" craze that seemed to have popped up recently is a fucking blight on other boards. I see this shit all the time on /a/ and /v/

>>397616
But what if they are referencing how a video game fits into that conspiracy? /pol/ doesn't come on here and complain when someone relates video games to politics.

Think of it like a Venn diagram. Where there is overlap, it should be allowed on both boards.

>>397616
This holy shit. Please do something to keep /pol/ in /pol/
I post there myself but I don't like seeing it in /a/ -not that it lasts long there, or /vg/ or /v/

>>397628
The difficulty is as soon as moot acknowledges that /pol/-leaking is a problem, the dudes who are trying to get the board deleted are gonna start spamming and then post screencaps here like they did a few weeks ago (in addition to whatever retards get out of the /pol/ containment facility to spread the Truth). I say we just make "red pill" and "anti-semitism" filtered words.

>>397628
Maybe every board should be granted an extra thread space, at the very top, and it can be a sticky redpill thread. Then everyone wins.

>>397565
Fuck off. It's completely /pol/s fault for being crossboard shitposters. I don't care whether you're right or wrong. The point is I go to /v/ to talk about vidya and I go to /a/ to talk about animu I don't go to them to preached to by you faggots about the evils of Jews and race mixing. If I wanted to, I'd go to fucking /pol/ Either keep your shit to your own board (yes, you are a CONTAINMENT board) or do your redpill shit somewhere else.

>>397655
to *be preached*

>>397655
Oh poor you, it must be so sad seeing those threads and how they hurt your feelings.

Still, there is no grounds for action to be taken yet.

>>397512
You do realise that largely isn't /pol/'s doing right? surely you've noticed some... shenanigans against /pol/ by offsite interests?

>>397682
>hurt your feelings
Way to miss the point. You could be preaching about how marvelous and tasty my dick is and I'd still tell you to fuck off. Keep your /pol/shit on /pol/. Is it that hard to understand or do I need to explain to you the concept of offtopic posts?

>>397705
For you to rage and swear that much in a post your feeling are ultra hurt.

>>397717
You're damn right I'm pissed off. I'm annoyed at the amount of offtopic /pol/shit I see shitting up the place

>>397717
Are you capable of responding to an argument with anything other than "u mad?"

>>397735
Is he capable of responding to an argument without swearing his head off like a edgy teenager?

File: 1359595911096.jpg-(89 KB, 720x720, Einstein.jpg)

89 KB JPG

>>397512
maybe the answer is a bi annual cleansing of /pol/

just keep switching it between /pol/ and something else of the like. but give one month in between the taking down of /pol/ and the rebuilding of its replacement. Time for that herpes flare up to go down.
give them time to become so large they start spilling into other boards....then kill it with fire.

repeat ever six months.

>>397750
Is it possible for you to actually reply to my posts without diverting the subject to unrelated rubbish?
I'm still waiting

>>397705
It's not /pol/ posting those threads.

It's someone with an interest in destroying /pol/

>>397777
a conspiracy is a foot?

>>397777
Where's your evidence then? I see these idiots all the time and they have the same mannerisms and posting habits as /pol/tards.

But if there really is some secret third party trying to destroy /pol/'s credibility (dohoho) and making these threads, then do tell.

>>397761
My main point still stands, there is no grounds for action to be taken, so a few stray posters from /pol/ may have posted some random things on your board, that's all on them, they should be punished not the board.

>>397796
I'm not advocating the destruction of /pol/
I'm just pointing out that /pol/ has failed as a containment board. /mlp/ eventually worked and ponyfags for the most part have been successfully corralled into their own board. /pol/ is a different matter.

>>397796
Yeah, I agree with you. I don't think /pol/ should be deleted. I just think that there should be public bannings for /pol/ shit outside /pol/

>>397809
thats because pony fags are beta numbnuts with no gumption

nazi conspiracy nuts on the other hand are full of hatred and ballsack.

you cannot use the behavior of one as the model for the other.

>Moot deleted /new/ several years ago with a very good reason - it because a breeding ground for stormtards and nazis

He deleted it because it ceased to be a news board.

>He then later created /pol/ never intending it to become the new /new/ but unfortunately his worst assumptions came true
False.
>/pol/ became a place not only for jew hating but also for other primitive display of racism, misogyny, and sexual intolerance of the greatest magnitude much greater than /new/ ever was a place where people that were banned from stormfront, edgy teen nazis

That's all fine on a board called 'politically incorrect'.

>>397814
I never claimed the /mlp/ and /pol/ were the same. Of course you need to approach /pol/ differently to /mlp/. I was just giving an example of a successful containment board

File: 1359597140334.jpg-(107 KB, 800x600, 934325457.jpg)

107 KB JPG

hey moot, just ax /pol/ and let that other site that it is forbidden to speak of retake it's users.

problem fucking solved. I mean how big of a user base could it be? Not like you'd even notice the drop in visits.

Seriously man, what is there to lose?

please don't ban me

>>397789
>>397793

http://www.thejidf.org/

>JIDF SHUTS THEM DOWN! - Combating hate and terror online
Jewish Herald Voice
December 21, 2009

>Anti-Israel Facebook Groups INFILTRATED
Canadian Jewish News
August 7, 2008

>Israel - Facebook: "Anti-Semitic" group HIJACKED by Jewish Force
The Coordination Forum for Countering Antisemitism
July 31, 2008

>Anti-Semitic group HIJACKED by Jewish Force
Telegraph UK
July 31, 2008

>Jewish Internet Defense Force 'SEIZES CONTROL' of anti-Israel Facebook group
Jerusalem Post
July 29, 2008

Shuts them down, infiltrated, seizes control, hijacked.... they admit to this stuff right on their front page. It's not even a conspiracy.

They are using the "shut them down" method, by pretending to be /pol/ and breaking all the rules.

>>397840
You assume they'd just jump ship to other sites the moment /pol/ sank, right? Wrong. You'd get a shitload of /pol/ refuges going to other boards and shitting them up even more

File: 1359597467654.png-(9 KB, 473x271, 1320001575572.png)

9 KB PNG

>>397853
You are correct, but the ones who were not trolls, sic I know, would jump ship to a place where they can discuss things in peace. The ones who stay to shit up 4chan would be banned for their tom foolery eventually.

>>397859
You mean like the forchon users who spammed forchon.org, ED and several 4chan boards (and apparently continue to do so)? There's a reason why mentioning it makes my post look like spam to the system, so don't try to deny it.

>>397869
I'm not to sure about all that, you do know there was another forchon and ".net" one that was headed by someone who had a feud against the admin of the .org and hired a guy to ddos and spam a bunch of places.

I'm not shitting you. There is also the possibility of JIDF interference, as it is a fact that they do shit like that.

File: 1359600293264.jpg-(174 KB, 731x1100, berserk-1590933[1].jpg)

174 KB JPG

>>397512
>Correct.
>/pol/ isn't a problem in itself. /pol/ bullshit spilling out into the other boards is.

But as long as /pol/ exists, it will keep attracting those kinds of users.

All I see is people getting put in there place by historical truth and facts, honestly whats wrong with that , like they say, its not racism/antisemitism/hate if the history or facts are true.

>>397936

>As long as 4chan exists, it will keep attracting those kinds of users

FTFY

>>397957

But muh holocaust

>>397311 (OP)

JIDF pls go

Mighty moot standing up to the zionist thought police.

LOL JIDF is so buttmad again! Sorry jews are not a race immune to criticism deal w. it kike.

>>397512
>/pol/ bullshit spilling out into the other boards is
Oh no! people are starting to notice libtard's bullshit! Whatever shall we do Professor Goldstien? Professor Goldenberg?

>>397840
That place is just a dumping ground for stormfags.

File: 1359607039144.png-(204 KB, 400x750, 1358297013378803939314.png)

204 KB PNG

>>398113
Well, goy... fellow user, I suggest shitposting with large quantities of cuckold porn.

>>398125
Isn't that what /pol/ is?

Not completely relevant but waking up from my nap and seeing porn is now banned on /pol/ is the greatest thing ever so thank you based moot

The reason /pol/ is "spreading" in my view is because believe it or not, people outside /pol/ talk about politics on their boards occasionally, or things peripherally related. Then it only takes one /pol/ user to make a politically incorrect comment (often times clearly intended as a joke) which sets someone who hasn't been redpilled off, then that gets responded to, it blows up and the thread gets derailed. I frequent /mu/ and I see it happen a lot. /mu/ is especially vulnerable because its base is so solidly liberal.

tl;dr, the problem isn't that /pol/ is spreading; politics has always been discussed on other boards. it's because now more cross-board users have opinions that dissent from the majority of a given board's culture, which causes more arguments and derailed threads.

Personally I was posting material that gets me called "from /pol/" long before /pol/ existed.

It's not raiding. It's not shitposting. It's just speaking the truth.

>>397512
wait - if >>397319 is right and new was deleted because it went from a news board to a politics board - does that mean we can have /new/ back?

>>398163

Absolutely correct. I'm sure there are a few /pol/ users who do raid other boards with the purpose of "redpilling" them. Most however are simply scenarios mentioned in +g4SrEsz's post.

File: 1359613677927.png-(238 KB, 500x363, 1359436426203.png)

238 KB PNG

>>398217
People can't handle it. Pic related

File: 1359614791296.jpg-(132 KB, 640x480, 1252422145613.jpg)

132 KB JPG

>>398217

Same here I simply have sympathy for my fellow man and truly despise the evil zionists bring to the world.

File: 1359615431788.jpg-(39 KB, 198x200, 1348452649323.jpg)

39 KB JPG

>>397616
>I want to talk about videogames, not the Jewish conspiracy to wipe out the white race.

Wow is that what you think /v/ is like these days?

Believe it or not it was worse than the /pol/ shittspamming "JIDF" "Stormfront" horseshit.

See: >>392806 →

>>398321
>>397616

On second thought, fuck the post, check out the entire thread.

Unless you count calling out viral advertising as "Jew conspiracy" spamming.

File: 1359618107550.jpg-(144 KB, 580x776, 1359219200494[2].jpg)

144 KB JPG

>>397960

4chan itself doesn't necessarily attract Neo-Nazis.

>/b/ attracts teens, tryhards, raid-fags, idiots, etc
>/v/ attracts vidya fans
>/tv/ attracts losers who want to talk about teenage starlets

etc.

/pol/ clearly draws in the racist fuckwads.

File: 1359619933639.jpg-(54 KB, 458x419, 1345165025630.jpg)

54 KB JPG

Only plebeians regurgitate the word "racist" and expect the crowd to yield to their demands.

>tjfw the word "racist" didn't exist before 1935
>tjfw the Jewish Zionists & Bolsheviks coined the word "racist" to be used in their campaign of ethnic genocide against White Europeans, and is in itself a racist ideology by its own definitions yet hides this fact be preempting the terminology for the Jew's nefarious ends
>tjfw when you're just a slave that beckons to the call of "diversity" like a puppet on a string, like a good little goy

>>397512
Nice moot. Look at all those butthurts.
>b-b-but we are right JEEEWWWSSSS

>>397682
None in it's right mind can give a fuck about /pol/ bullshit.
When i see it i don't give a fuck, i just sit back and smile thinking how miserable or dumber can these people get.

the redpilling and raiding of other boards is bullshit, it must be. /new/ and /n/ never did this kind of shit, it must be /b/tards blaming /pol/

>>398603
Raiding other boards is a very /b/ thing to do, seeing as a lot of /pol/ users are just people that think they're too good for /b/ it's expected they do the same things.

>>397512
That's sort of the problem with "containment" boards, isn't it? You're creating a place for undesirables to congregate, on this website. It's to be expected that some of them will post on more than one board. If your object is to remove their influence entirely, it might be better to remove the welcome mat, and delete the "containment" board. Obviously this won't solve the problem entirely, but I think it'll have a higher success rate than your current solution.


That's not to say I think you should delete /pol/. I think that the the hands off moderation policy has allowed certain elements within the group of people that post there to fester and spread, and this has caused to board to stagnate. I think more/better moderation is a better solution to this than outright deletion. Keeping these elements in check on /pol/ will do much for keeping them in check on the website as a whole, imo.

Just some thoughts moot, and I realize you're short-handed atm so some of these ideas might not be feasible.

Regardless, thanks for what you do.

>>398613

i agree that the whole containment board idea is flawed.

take racism, which is universally disliked by most people. once you say it is fine on /b/, it becomes impossible to keep it off the other boards.

>>398613
When /pol/ first started, I could have sworn there was a sticky from moot saying it was only a temporary board for the 2012 US presidential elections.

Couldn't /k/ be combined with /pol/? Seems they would get along well.

>>398613
>it might be better to remove the welcome mat, and delete the "containment" board.
>That's not to say I think you should delete /pol/.
Also
>/pol/ isn't a problem in itself.
>Keeping these elements in check on /pol/ will do much for keeping them in check on the website as a whole, imo.
>>398617
>racism, which is universally disliked by most people
>universally
>by most
Nice weasel words faggot.

Moot I can guarantee the red pill threads will disappear if you ban these faggots. Agreeing with any part of their agenda just inspires them to create more red pill threads to point fingers at.

>>398620
No newfag. You are mistaken.

File: 1359645950773.png-(14 KB, 268x510, Report-3-2008-02.png)

14 KB PNG

>>398617
Not everyone on 4chan is a liberal american, we even have muslims here, and they hate jews with a ferocity not matched by even the most nazi of "stormfags".

>>398632

i didn't mean to say that i thought most people were not racist, but that it is unacceptable to express racist sentiments, as most intelligent people know that it accomplishes nothing of value.

my point was that as long as 4chan says it's ok to express racism on one board, it is very difficult to exclude it from other boards.

>>398623
>agenda

lol'd

File: 1359647126834.jpg-(128 KB, 500x1200, normalfag.jpg)

128 KB JPG

>>398643
>asking for racism to be banned on 4chan

4chan has always had racism, in jest and in earnest, you could just go to one the many sites that impose political correctness, and not endlessly bitch on /q/ about political incorrectness on a board titled thus.

>>398658
*one of

>>398658
The world has always had racism, in jest and in earnest. That does not make it good, or even acceptable.

>>398643
>but that it is unacceptable to express racist sentiments, as most intelligent people know that it accomplishes nothing of value.
Actually it allows you to identify friend and foe on instinct so you can immediately tell that the group of whites walking down the street won't harm you but the group of blacks is something you should be wary of. To deny that you should see the blacks as foes is to deny that they instinctively see you as a foe when we are all human. This instinct is absolute and unless everyone in the world loses it at the same time you're only creating a system of tolerant victims.

>>398661
And who are you to judge what is acceptable or not?

>>398663
I'm didn't say I was worthy of defining the acceptability of anything. I merely pointed out the naturalistic fallacy inherent in your post.

File: 1359648021860.jpg-(20 KB, 353x404, 1341384646608.jpg)

20 KB JPG

What I want to know is it really that hard to have flags that match our IPs like /sp/? The JIDF flag was funny for a day now it just looks stupid.

>1) We'll do user-selectable flags at some point in the future, but it might be a few months until we get to it.
>a few months

>>398669
What fallacy? You /q/ueers seem to have set yourself up here and think yourselves to be the moral conscience of the site, dictating terms to the /pol/ board and moot himself, who is the only one with the authority to decide what is acceptable here, and he considers racism on /b/ and /pol/ acceptable.

>>398679
cry more babby

File: 1359648333959.jpg-(149 KB, 511x499, WAAAAHHH pol is bullying me.jpg)

149 KB JPG

>>397512
But of course, you can't hols the whole board responsible. just find a way to reduce it.

>>398662
Have you ever met a "black?" Do you have any idea how stupid you sound?

>>398684
That's a really solid argument, look, if you can't stand racism or the /pol/ board just avoid it and hide the comments or fuck off to another site.

>>397311 (OP)
but /pol/ is like a zoo: it's fun to laugh at the angry monkeys

>>398661
Sure it does.

File: 1359654426475.jpg-(284 KB, 1161x869, 1356992179104.jpg)

284 KB JPG

It still amazes me that people don't realize the JIDF stuff is satire.

How do you idiots dress yourselves?

>>398856
>He believes something with a website, wikipedia page, documented activities, and unofficial support from the IDF exists! He must be a stormtard!

Stormfags are just as bad hell if you aren't trying to be worse

>>398903
*are just as bad, but hell if

>>398845
I think it's safe to say they probably do post on /pol/ considering they've complained about 4chan openly before

>>397655

>yes, you are a CONTAINMENT board

Just like /a/ is a containment board for people who like anime, and how /v/ is meant to pen up all the people who like vidya.

Why don't you keep your hostile autism to yourself. It isn't our fault you're so desperate to be blind from the truth.

File: 1359687918552.png-(38 KB, 1255x418, pol red pill.png)

38 KB PNG

>>397628
This, fucking obnoxious as hell.

>>397311 (OP)
/pol/ needs to be exactly what it is.
Free Speech doesn't end where your feelings begin.

hurr nazis is not a reason to delete a board
moot realized this eventually

>>397844
They SAID they seized control through their 1337 hacking skills. You believe them? They're a bunch of retards with a persecution complex.

MUCH LIKE A CERTAIN BOARD ON 4CHAN

Now, which of these groups is more likely to shitpost on 4chan? The retarded schizophrenics that, to my knowledge, have never mentioned /pol/? (Especially considering they're really big on publicizing their latest targets). Or the retarded schizophrenics FROM 4CHAN?

They asked for evidence that the JIDF is working to undermine /pol/. You posted evidence that the JIDF... exists. Great work.

>>397655
/pol/ does keep its shit on its own board.
What are you talking about?

>>399601
Please refer to: >>399557 for an example of /pol/ "keeping its shit on its own board".