File: 1359407857331.jpg-(56 KB, 240x344, Brahm-san.jpg)

56 KB JPG

Google Jake Brahm.

He got V& cause he posted stupid shit on /b/ (although I'm not sure if Moot directly handed out his ip or not)

I don't think it's a good idea for 4chan to be handing poster information over to federal agencies. That's some 1984-level shit.

>>392908
is he still in prison?

>>392901 (OP)
Hello newfriend. CP on /b/ has never been such a rarity. /b/ is a containment board to stop all the shit from spilling over to the other boards. If it bothers you so much you can always take your moral cunt elsewhere. I here r3ddit is popular. Now fuck off and an hero.

File: 1359412031211.png-(29 KB, 1708x293, EZsDuMZ[1].png)

29 KB PNG

Moot gives the IPs to the FBI, it's the law.
(the image is taken from wikipedia, I can't post a link to it for some reason)

>>392901 (OP)
Any pics that shows kids in a suggestive or sexual manner is to be reported as illegal, even if they're professional models with a legal, they're still minors and such threads would spiral into CP easily.

Moot does enough. The posts are deleted, and the IP of the poster and those requesting it are handed over to the feds.

>>392964

careful not to cut yourself, bud

>CP threads in /b/
Report for illegal material.

>guys posting children who are clothed
No one cares if you think it's creepy, it's okay.

>>392983
It's not actually Federal Law that moot is required to give IP addresses for criminal offenses. He has to comply if he is served with a Federal warrant, but he's under no obligation to report any crime.

If you fail to report a crime that you've witnessed, then you're violating a moral code but not the law. Obstruction of Justice is only for when you are questioned by law enforcement or when served with a legal warrant.

>4Chan
>C
First year here?

>>392960
>I don't think it's a good idea for 4chan to be handing poster information over to federal agencies. That's some 1984-level shit.

Comparing surveillance in your living room by the state to reporting people who sexually-exploit children? Really?


>>392964
Filthy pathetic pedophile detected.

Like most people I think CP is fucking disgusting and I'll happily do what I can to see those peddling in it busted and on their face's with a cop's knee in their back. I know in /b/ there are plenty of freaks "hurr durr whitenight!!1" but /q/ and many of the other boards are different.

So, is 4Chan doing enough to stop this BS, and should I report threads that have pictures of children in them, even clothed?

File: 1359412986082.png-(245 KB, 990x2064, 1348587423058.png)

245 KB PNG

How come faggot and transexuals are getting acceptance but not pedos? It's just as, if not more natural, this is bigotry of the highest form.

>>392963
He got out after 6 months of federal prison and a 6 month house arrest period. He also had to pay $26,750 to the stadiums due to security costs, which is basically just the FBI's final blow to make sure the unemployed kid is hated by his parents for all eternity

>>393002
>He has to comply if he is served with a Federal warrant, but he's under no obligation to report any crime.
Couldn't it fall under misprision of felony? http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4

>>393007
>MUH FEELINGS!!!
Why are you on /b/ or 4chan again?

>>393010
Whoops disregard that, just found out he worked at a grocery store

Although his parent's probably still bring that up whenever he does something to piss them off

>>392901 (OP)
Clothed children doing nothing out of the ordinary are not CP

Don't go on a witch hunt now. You can see that in any clothing catalogue you get sent to your house.

File: 1359413352411.jpg-(45 KB, 360x480, 1.jpg)

45 KB JPG

>>393000
>>guys posting children who are clothed
>No one cares if you think it's creepy, it's okay.
Actually, posting images of any minor without parental consent, regardless of the contents of the image, is illegal in all 50 states.

One defense to this is posting pictures of yourself. For example, a 16 year old posting a picture of themselves on Facebook is legal. You downloading that picture and reposting it elsewhere is illegal.

Another defense to this is still images from film or television that has a child actor or public images of public figures. For example, me posting this picture is legal even though I do not have parental consent.

The general rule when it comes to pictures of children is: No private pictures.

>>393020
Why not stop posting anything copyrighted on the entirety of 4chan while we're at it?
Follow the law!


Get out.

>>393011
Misprision in the United States requires active concealment, not failure to report. Similar to aiding and abetting.

>>393022
Jesus fuckballs, man. How does "explaining the law" and "demanding the law be followed" come anywhere close to the same thing in your tiny ass pea brain?

You get out.

>>393024
Wouldn't the removal of the post count as active concealment?

>>393020
And I'm sure every person who has ever posted an image of a child WITHOUT their parent's consent is going to be v&

Any newspapers, magazines, or internet articles that used pictures of children to prove a point are going to get a big wad of FBI dick, aren't they?

Although I'm assuming you're simply stating the law, and actually have no preference to one side or another, it's still such an arbitrary law that it shouldn't even be an influence.

>>393026
Not unless you do it with the intent of trying to hide it from the authorities. Otherwise it's just moot doing his job.

>>393026
It is possible, yes, but not necessarily. Law enforcement could make it annoying for moot by arresting him and a Judge could set an example by sentencing moot to prison using 18 USC 4.

However, moot's defense lawyer would probably cite various statutes of the DMCA and have charges dropped, but all of that mess would still cost moot time, money, and reputation.

It is smarter for moot to report all felonies, but he's not obligated to do so.

>>393030
Newspapers, magazines, articles, and even high school year books are required by law to obtain written parental consent.

If they don't, then charges can be filed by the parents or the State.

>4Chan
>Chan
>C

what the fuck, nigger

>>393002
Oh, I thought he got 10 years in a federal prison

OP, you are aware that the images typically posted on /b/ are really old and not made by the poster himself right? Typically they're saved from /b/ or other sites then reposted. I doubt 95% of the userbase here have access to actual children in the first place. And that clothed children aren't considered pornography. If you really do find it offensive that CP is occasionally posted here (which is against the rules and probably really high up on the IP range ban priority list), then go to a different board or different site altogether.

Shouldn't you be happy that they're just using it for fap material rather than going out there and actually raping a kid?

>>393079
Nah. Even if he violates 18 USC 4, that only carries a maximum 3 year sentence.

Creepy as it may be, pictures of clothed children are not considered CP, regardless of the intent behind sharing them.

Yes, report them on sight. Moot works with the FBI to van these fags, and a few of them may have been V& and we never noticed it. There was a 15 year old that spammed CP and got his shit raided, I'm not sure if you remember that.

>>393007
I think you should definitely leave. I mean all the pedos come to 4chan. We love it here. If you stay you'll only be associating yourself with the worst type of people. This places isn't for you. You're so much better than this place. You should definitely leave. If you don't you're just as bad as us pedos. In fact staying is tantamount to supporting our position. For instance if 4chan was a coffee shop that you visited but it also happened to be the favourite coffee shop of pedos would you still go there? Of course you wouldn't. So fuck off.

>>393009
Everyone flips out at the first mention of "She" when referring to a trap.

Holy shit. What happened to this fucking site over the last four years?

>>392960

no see it's okay because we're only after pedos, the FBI is a completely legit democratically elected thing, and i'm really fucking stupid

>>393386
Old users left and new users joined, that's about it.

File: 1359425721532.jpg-(203 KB, 728x409, saturday morning cartoons.jpg)

203 KB JPG

I remember when Tommy Lee Jones would only get posted as a voice of reason amongst madness and niggers pounding their chests.
You sir, are cancer.

>>393393

>older users left

Oh I noticed.

So aside from all the new word filters and people now wanting to crusade against cp here when can I expect facebook integration directly on the site? I'd like to also be able to tweet my posts on /b/ to my grandma cause she loves this place.

>>393258
No, I'd get together with all the other normal people who enjoy the coffee shop and beat the living shit out of the pedophiles. They can go have coffee in their homes.

>>393401
You didn't know the mechanical queers at gayrobot already have this in motion. We're getting like buttons next to posts starting in spring!

**upvote this post if you love puppies**

>>393769

i'm not a pedo but i just want to draw attention to the fact that this is the kind of unironic post /q/ literally draws

an authentic internet tough guy

i thought they stopped making those!

>>393769
And thats why the internet is a brilliant invention. People can meet up and discuss their topics with out getting the shit beaten out of them.

>>393775
Awesomesauce! I hope we get an option to link posts to Twitter!

>>393769
The coffee shop was metaphorical you retard. The coffee shop is 4chan you can't magically force the pedos out of here due to it's structure. Hence you CHOOSE to stay here and associate yourself with the likes of me. You have CHOSEN to converse with me. Lets face it you love being here because you want to talk to people like me. Well honey, if you want some of my candy bars you have to give me something in return.

>>393030
There's a problem with this reasoning: Many Eastern European child model/CP sites _do_ operate with the parents' full permission since they're poor and it puts borsch on the table.

>>393013
Yes, dear autist, people have feelings. People get upset when you do something immoral and hurtful. And yes, browsing 4chan or /b/ isn't a free pass to leave your morality or sense of decency at the door.

>>393811
>All posts are this board are works of fiction

You were saying?

>>393778

i think you mean "awesomeBALLS" ;)

>>393814
I don't think
>all posts [on] this board are works of fiction
translates to
"it's okay to post illegal content and be an ass"

>>393817
>be an ass

Come on dude, you really cling to muh feelings that hard?

>B-B-BUT MUH MORELS!!!
There's nothing wrong with posting pictures of clothed children faggot, it's the same thing as posting cute pictures of cats.

>>393821
I was just pointing out the asinine reasoning and attitude behind your posts.

and frankly the "muh feelings" line is getting old. If you're behaving in a way that will upset other people, the fault is on you for being an ass not on others for having feelings.

>>393811
>browsing 4chan or /b/ isn't a free pass to leave your morality or sense of decency at the door
Wait. When was this?
These post-Chanology posters give me headaches.

>>393836
"Common sense" would fit better than "morality" I think.

>>393830
But being an ass is subjective. Regulating speech is the lazy way out, and there was already a filtering system that could have been used.