Reposting liks

>>>/cgl/6414796
>>>/cgl/6420143

oh /cgl/ ....

The only problem I have is that who ever is modding the board has no idea about the "culture" of /cgl/. As we've already complained, threads that are /cgl/ relevant (yes, including catty PT threads) are being deleted while threads along the line of "/fit/ here, why are you all sluts?" are left to explode on the front page.

TLDR: the mods on /cgl/ don't know what /cgl/ is

>>284072 (OP)
Before people start complaining about "off topic" threads,
Makeup/Cosplay&Loli Drama/green-text/ general entertaining /cgl/ culture related threads are getting deleted while TRULY off topic shit threads ("Why can't I find a girlfriend?" "Why is /cgl/ full of whores?" "Why are women..." etc) remain untouched by mods.

I just don't get why the /fit/ threads stay up for ages, they get their kicks "invading" us and nobody likes it

Question to you all. If a topic gets derailed, should it be reported if there is no sign of it going back on topic?

File: 1353091872398.png-(168 KB, 400x400, 1352590589069.png)

>mfw just the other day even a period thread got deleted.

>>284125
That's over-moderation imo.
Let people just report individual posts if that is the case.

>>284125
I don't. Usually I just start posting pics that pertain to the main topic and answer a question relating to the main topic that went unanswered/ ask a question myself. It usually works as the trolls and shitposters usually get bored if the thread returns to the main topic.

>>284125

No, the offtopic posts should be dealt with, leaving a clean on topic thread.

>>284125
Kill them with kindness. Post relveant content and get a discussion going. Soon the good posts will out number the shit ones

>>284126
At least one janitor/mod must be a dude...why else would that get deleted?

The moderation isn't the problem. Our janitor is doing a fine job. The residents of /cgl/ need to take responsibility for their board's content by making higher quality posts on their own accord. If they hold their own posts to the standards they're demanding from other people, they can change things. Complaining about moderation is the equivalent of saying that our janitor should be the person controlling the content of every thread, and that's ridiculous.

>>284158
Then why are the good people getting banned and the shitty ones still going?

>>284153

Since when the fuck are periods related to cosplay, idiot?

>>284104

Board rules are very clear about cunty drama, PT shit-talking threads are not allowed, why are you acting surprised that board rules are being enforced as written?

>>284163
No, the shitty ones are ban evading. The 'good' ones deserved their bans for their respective offenses.

>>284180

>God
>Always calls peoples fatties
>Only selfposts
>doesn't give advice
>Spams "You mad" in various threads
Still posts

>Gropey
>Posts tutorials non stop
>Shares interesting costume stories
>Answers people's questions effectively
>Supportive toward other people's projects
>Keeps his shit to one thread
Is banned

How does this make sense?

>>>/cgl/6420293
>>>/cgl/6420304
I've had it with random bans

>tripfags known to be a positive influence on the board are receiving bans whey shittys ones are not
"Known to be a positive influence on the board" is not a free pass to break the rules. The mods don't look at tripfags and say "well they're normally OK so I'll let them off," the mods don't look at an off topic thread and sift through it looking for said tripfags or unsung heroes saging and flooding as "self-moderation." That's favoritism and has no place on 4chan. moot and the mods make and enforce the rules on 4chan, not some clique of tripfags. They delete, ban, and threadban when appropriate.

Decade avatars and at least once has flooded in an off topic troll thread which got seen by a mod, deleted, and probably threadbanned.
rbt.asia/cgl/thread/6314259 >>>/cgl/6314259
>>>/cgl/6415062
>I was banned for no reason
>I like the Idea of Rider bombing a thread... Ive done it a few times and it worked, people stopped posting after 40 Japanese bug men appear..
Yet he was banned for "no reason?" Gimme a fuckin' break.

Johnny avatars/roleplays and makes self-posting circlejerks, and how the hell does ANYONE even Johnny's banned other than word-of-mouth from their fellow tripfag butt-buddies outside the confines of 4chan?

File: 1353100111786.jpg-(39 KB, 400x442, sad clown.jpg)

>>284237
Gropey had ONE thread deleted in his entire history of threads because it was general chit-chat, self-bumping, and off topic/meta arguing. He got WARNED, proceeded to be a drama queen, and flounced.
rbt.asia/cgl/?task=search2&search_tripcode=z3Lf/vIW4kd&search_op=op
rbt.asia/cgl/thread/6367695 >>>/cgl/6367695
He's gone of his own volition.
rbt.asia/cgl/thread/6367439#p6367580
>So report and minimize.
rbt.asia/cgl/thread/6367439#p6367650
>Then report, hide and move on with your life.
Make-up advice is one thing, dumping clown pictures is another. Clowns aren't cosplaying anything, it's a profession, clowns are no more cosplay-related than acrobats or professional wrestlers.

>>284237
people circulated the screen shot of his ban

Has moot ever posted on cgl? Just wondering...

File: 1353101975866.png-(14 KB, 461x304, soni.png)

>>284247
Only once a few years ago to the best of my recollection, I only remember because of this.

>>284259
Lol. Well, at least he knows we exist.

It was several months back, in the beginning of /q/ that Moot - somewhat - addressed the issue we are discussing right now.
Several large threads on /q/ expressed the need for a /fem/ board - a board designed for femanons they we can talk girly matters, anything from fashion to period threads. After several days/a couple of weeks, Mootykins finally answered. He said that there is no need to create a board. While he admitted the growing female population on 4chan, he argued that some of those /fem/-related topics could fall under existing boards, such as /fa/ or /adv/.
He also said that regarding the other topics, such as haircare, makeup, skincare and others, they are integrated into /cgl/ and have their place there.
Obviously, that is no longer the case today. Such topics are banned from /cgl/ and anything not included into EGL or Cosplay gets banned by the mods. We even had a grimoire thread disappear just the other day, meaning that even J-fashion now belongs outside /cgl/, yet /jp/ still won't accept it.
On the other hand, there is an overflow with mini-invasions from the other boards, especially /fit/, /a/ and /r9k/, who use /cgl/ as some sort of online survey where they question women on a wide variety of topics, such as 'why are all girls sluts', 'have you been raped when you were a child', 'how many guys have you slept with', 'would you date this guy' and so on. These threads have a quite long life span, while alternative fashions and care threads gets deleted immediately.

That begs the question: where do such threads belong now? If we are no longer allowed to post such things on existing boards, does that mean that there will be a creation of a new /fem/ board, after all? Or will the moderation on /cgl/ change to include alternative fashions/lifestyles in general?

>>284277
That would just attract even more invasions. It would need heavy, intelligent moderation to counteract them, which is exactly what /cgl/ lacks...

>>284284
I guess you are right regarding the /fem/ topics. We all know that moot cannot spare his few mods to /cgl/ when bigger boards like /a/, /mu/ and /sp/ need so much help.
But what about the broadening of /cgl/ to also include alternative fashions/care threads?

>>284288
Broadening the topics allowed on /cgl/ seems to be the only option, it's a relatively slow board that needs little moderation besides the "invasions"...

>>284288

It seems straight up ridiculous to ban and delete jfash threads, especially gyaru, fairy kei, mori, dolly-kei, and similar, because they're so inexorably linked with lolita and girls often buy from the same stores.

>>284277
I think hair, make-up, hair, alternative fashion, etc. should remain on /cgl/. I don't know, call it /cgl/ - Cosplay, Gyaru, Lolita, Etc. or whatever so you don't have to change the URL, which I heard is more trouble than it's worth. These threads have been on /cgl/ for years with no problems and no need for moderator intervention. But I think feels and periods should go to /adv/, /r9k/, and /b/ where they belong.

/cgl/ was fine until we started getting raided on a constant basis almost a year ago, and I campaigned hard to get that stuff removed exhausting every avenue I could think of (reporting, hiding, not replying, IRC, e-mailing moot, making /cgl/ threads and /q/ threads discussing it), but I feel like I've been ignored all the while. Things were OK for a while when our janitor was checking in two or three times a day deleting shitposting from other boards, but they slowly stopped doing anything. I assume they were just plucked from the existing janitor/moderator pool on volunteer duty and got sick of it. We had a huge stretch where no one was doing anything about shitposts from other boards, yet there were random bans for drama here and there. It was only within the past few weeks that a mod seemed to be checking in regularly and handing out bans (not that I don't appreciate it), but they seem to be scorching the Earth a little.
rbt.asia/cgl/thread/6419636
(mind you, there's no proof that OP didn't delete that for some reason, of course)

>>284296
Exactly. And make-up and skincare are also indirectly related to both, cosplay and Lolita, just like wigs.
Having such threads that we considered part of our culture continuously deleted is exactly why we decided to raise this issue here on /q/ and hope for either, a fix to the problem or at least a clarification on where we should take such threads next. We considered /jp/ since J-fashions may be considered otaku but /jp/sies won't have it.

>>284301
I agree with you. Making alternative J-fashion officially part of /cgl/ seems to be the only way for the mods to stop eradicating those threads.
Then we would still get the off-topic dramu, invasions and 'why is cgl x' type of threads deleted, but we would get to keep the topics which made me become a seagull in the first place.

Also, it seems the thread on moderation on /cgl/ got deleted, so I guess the mods are aware of this issue now.

>>284302
>Having such threads that we considered part of our culture

Board culture is not a good excuse for anything, especially off topic posting.

>>284238
No one gives a flying fuck about your favorite tripfag. Why is it so hard to comprehend?

Just because he's tripping does not mean he's above the rules.

What happened to the active thread on /cgl/ was it was deleted?

There was a lot of discussion going on on the subject and no one was breaking the rules. Why would it be removed?

>>284314
That culture is things that Moot himself said that belonged to our board, despite not being specified in the rules. Having such threads deleted now causes mass confusion and butthurt. Nothing shocking there.
>>284340
They want to put down a mutiny by limiting our access to free information @.@

The posters make the board, right? Sometimes boards organically add new related themes and this shouldn't be condemned out of hand. Discussions of subfashions has been going on for a long time on /cgl/ and seems like a good fit. It wasn't causing problems at least. Allowing such talk would also be within the spirit of the board, as the acronym EGL already refers to one subfashion. For that matter convention talk on /cgl/ is considered a natural outgrowth of cosplay, and a fair amount of people do show up in Japanese subfashions at cons. Just as there's lots of overlap between people who cosplay and dress as lolitas, so is there between many other subfashions. So if mods and janitors could be more flexible it would be nice.

>>284330
No one is saying because he's a trip he's above the rules. Learn to comphrehend. And yes we do care.

>>284342
>They want to put down a mutiny by limiting our access to free information @.@
It was probably because meta-threads are off-topic.

File: 1353107384979.jpg-(91 KB, 576x625, rrrruuurrruuuuu.jpg)

>>284340
IIRC metathreads/rules discussions are strictly speaking not allowed. All such discussions should take place on /q/.

fem here

>board full of woman
>not having drama

ok then

>>284351
It's just that the thread soon turned to how cgl could improve. That message is easier spread on the actual board of origin than io /q/

>>284323 →
>I'd also like to add, why is it that they always conveniently vanish whenever we're raided by /r9k/ and /fit/?
>So they'll delete all the relevant threads, just not the myriad of tfw no gf and "why are women such whores" threads?
Just replying to this here since the OP may delete the other thread. One time /fit/ raided per the usual and a mod with their capcode on not only ignored the few threads on /fit/ inciting it (posting with their capcode on in one or two of them), but the ~20 resultant threads on /cgl/, because some were pushing for a /cgl/-/fit/ meet-up and he wanted to participate.
rbt.asia/cgl/thread/6337020#p6338529
So a mod is allowing their biases to get in the way of their duties because they too have been sucked into the frenzied behavior triggered by the notion of a secret "girl board" trove. Initially I felt it should've stayed in my e-mail to moot, but it pisses me off so much and the unresponsiveness of staff compelled me to share.

>>284362
>the thread turned to how /cgl/ could improve
Still a meta thread
Still against the rules

>>284368
Not the anon you're talking to but I agree. But I just wish other shitty threads would also get deleted as well.
>>284367
That is unacceptable and I think we should really get new janitors/a mod that knows a thing or two about /cgl/. But more than that, I wish Moot would clear up this fog on this matter of what IS and what ISN'T /cgl/.

>>284368
Where does it say a meta thread is against the rules?

>>284108
tfw when mu is filled to the brim with feels threads and no one minds
tfw I dont even mind

>>284126
was that the vagina one? that one was pretty entertaining

>>284362
That's understandable. Going straight here could mean a poster ends up a lone voice because nobody replies. Which just gives the impression it's not a major problem. It's more effective to mobilize a response on the affected board first.

I don't think the janitor was unreasonable though, the threads were deleted only after maxing out.

>>284414
>a poster ends up a lone voice because nobody replies
Funny thing you mention that. Last week I started a thread over here regarding the 'Average Korean GF' problem that a lot of boards on 4chan tend to have. Despite the fact that there were several anon responding that indeed, they also have seen that happen on board X or board Y, because of a lack of actual board posters, it went down pretty quickly despite my attempts to keep it up.
I think that really poses a big problem. It is unlikely posters will leave their respective boards and start lurking /q/ in order for them to stumble over a thread concerning their board and say 'yes, it's true, we have that problem'.

File: 1353111016459.png-(35 KB, 800x473, 1321612357544.png)

>>284319 →

LOL i actually think you got /jp/'s old janitor (i pray to god she is gone for good).

Not even you vapid sluts deserve this bitch (we call her NSJ or new shitty janitor) but she is a /cgl/ reject so it makes sense she's back where she belongs. im pretty sure she quit /jp/ after crying to moot because everyone hates her, she gets dedicated hate threats throughout the day and many image macros created to express contempt for her.

she is a loathsome spiteful bitch, good luck.

>>284437
what exactly did she do to /jp/ ?

>>284319 →
God fucking dammit your shit thread isn't /cgl/ related. And now you have to come to /q/ and shit it up to whine about it? As someone who has been here since /cgl/ was created, fuck off.

>>284442
hey hey now
this is a place for questions, still

>>284442
lol
Cosplay is cosplay related, actually. Maybe if you yell and swear more?

>>284442
I am not sure if OP is the one who made the second topic on /cgl/. We are just trying not to get our J-fashion banned anymore, or at least get some of this fog cleared up, nothing more, no need to get offensive.

>>284441

she deletes an uncountable amount of on-topic posts. also banned a few tripfags but that's pretty much it. despite knowing nothing about the board or board culture she gets to decide what is and what is not /jp/ material. our old janitor was great until moot made him ragequit then we got this stupid bitch who like i said is a from /cgl/ and knows nothing about /jp/.

"otaku culture" is an incredibly large and nebulous range of topics so she pretty much got to play god with which threads got deleted and which didn't.

the reason i think you have her is because you are having the same complaints we did, the timing matches up perfectly, and she is from /cgl/. i could be wrong but i doubt it.

>>284459

so, basically exactly what the current /cgl/ janitor is doing to us right now then?

Do you have her picture or some of the hate thread material you mentioned? Maybe we can do what /jp/ did and just abuse her until she fucks off.

> despite knowing nothing about the board or board culture she gets to decide what is and what is not /jp/ material

fuuuuck this is EXACTLY what our janitor is doing.

J-fashion fits in /cgl/
HURF BLURF /fit/ HERE, WHY DONT YOU BITCHES LIKE ME threads dont
Neither do /r9k/'s "WAAA ITS YOUR FAULT I CANT GET LAID" threads

>>284466
>just abuse her until she fucks off
I don't want to be a goody-two-shoes but I have a feeling that is not something Moot would appreciate and we may get a slap for it from Moot.
I think it's better just to keep asking for him to either broaden the rules of /cgl/ or at least tell us where to take our J-fashion/care topics.

>>284466
i don't think it'd work with /cgl/, we don't have many unique viewers compared to the other boards and half the board would end up banned

>>284473
whoops nevermind, thought you were talking about a mod not a janitor
still, if we ended up getting threadbanned a lot of people would go missing

>>284474

Fuck this shitty fucking bitch janitor.
IT IS THE POSTERS THAT MAKE A BOARD, NOT YOUR RULES.

Just an idea, but what about creating a new board for J-fashion? That was all the lolita/mori/girl drama can be contained on one board and they'll get to stink up their own territory while the cosplayers can have a shot at pulling themselves together. Then the lolitas' issues will be penned up in one place for them to deal with on their own.

>>284483
we've tried doing that but it never worked out
plus whether we like it or not j fashion is still connected to other cgl topics such as makeup and can help us out occasionally

>>284494
What do you mean by "tried"? There was a J-fashion board at one point?! I had no idea.

I feel like the topics have some overlap, but not enough to warrant keeping them together. I believe wig styling and weird shoes is where the similarities end, because overdone lolita/gal/gyaru makeup does not seem like the way to go with cosplay makeup. I don't see how crafting armor or building swords could help a lolita, and I don't see how knowing all the lolita Taobao shops, which itas are stinking up communities, or MANABANANASAMA will aid the cosplayers.

Because these two very different subjects also touch upon tangential subjects, it's too much criteria for one board and so truly staying "on topic" is difficult...

File: 1353113672261.jpg-(116 KB, 500x323, 118g9sh.jpg)

(Some of this is a re-post from the now deleted /cgl/ mod thread)

1 Pictures depicting those in costume play ("cosplay") and elegant gothic lolita ("EGL") dress are welcome.
2 Don't bring community drama into this board. Singling out particular cosplayers and trolling them will not be tolerated.
3 ALL DRAMA ALL THE TIME!

these are the actual rules. I've been banned recently for number #2, even though rule #3 is a clear contradiction. Although it was obviously a sarcastic addition (probably around the time our name was changed to /drama/), at the same time it is an acknowledgement that the petty girl bullshit is a very integrated part of our board's culture. If every other board gets to have their own shitty "board culture" aspects, why can't we have ours?

>>284483
/cgl/ is not just cosplay, you know? As another anon pointed out, the demand for a exclusively cosplay board is not high enough to reason the creation of one.

>>284502
nah not really
it was in the talks but nothing actually happened because there wasn't enough reason for it
also the application of makeup, such as the techniques, remain very similar in terms of the types of makeup used, etc. and taobao helps with wigs that could be used in some cosplays.

File: 1353114025748.jpg-(40 KB, 320x480, 1277155489630.jpg)

>>284505
Also why is our board being penalized for adopting the "off-topic" threads that other boards refuse to tolerate? None of the other boards are going to allow us to talk about skin care, make-up, hair and other subcultures of Japanese fashion. People touting that it needs to be taken to /fa/-- have you even BEEN there? They don't want these threads and we have always embraced them with open arms. Wouldn't the issue then be with the other boards that won't let us talk about this shit even though that's "supposed" to be their territory? This board is already extremely narrow in its topic; there is only so much you can talk about something as niche as cosplay and lolita. It's literally two Japanese fashion subcultures out of hundreds. I think people across the /cgl/ can mutually agree that other Japanese fashion subcultures and face/hair/body care general are okay and welcome because they are so closely integrated and intertwined with the usual discussions.

/jp/ browser here

>>>/jp/10069178

Stop posting your problems on our board, please.
We don't care.

>>284357
The problem is that the some drama is getting deleted while others aren't. Example being the pixy threads vs the "lel y r u gurls such sluts?" ones.

>>284517
We apologize for the inconvenience. Some of our fellow seagulls tend to be quite slow and reckless.

>>284525

Could you suck harder please? I think there's a little piece of shit still stuck right in a crevice.

>>284528
get out of that crevice mate

File: 1353115055988.png-(101 KB, 540x534, myhole.png)

>>284529
I think he won't give up on that.

>>284531
after living there for many years I guess it must be hard to move

Another /jp/sie here, I was compelled to come to /q/ to see if there was a post on this, but all I found was garbage.

First, people are asking "for a /cgl/ mod" or something similar - no such thing, mods are global
>Waah the janitor is deleting period threads and off-topic chit chat
That's just enforcing the rules. Stop whining about it. Seems to me the only reason people are upset is because their favorite tripfag got banned. Who cares? First off, it's a team effort (which is to say, a janitor can only submit a request for a ban, therefore at least 2 people or 1 mod who happens to be browsing /cgl/ can decide it) and second tripfags shouldn't be exempt from the rules just because they're liked.

What you are all complaining about only comes down to 1 legitimate issue: That threads related to /cgl/ (makeup, wigs etc) are being deleted and some raids have not been paid much attention to. Beyond that, there's no wrong-doing.

Look, for example, at this post:
>>284515
>why is our board being penalized for adopting the "off-topic" threads
If your board as a community can't grasp the concept of how off-topic posts are going to be deleted, then what's your problem?

>>284545
>If your board as a community can't grasp the concept of how off-topic posts are going to be deleted, then what's your problem?

I don't really understand what you mean.

We understand what off-topic posts are, but our board culture finds most j-fashion subculture threads and hair/makeup to be quite relevant and are accepted. While I get that the board rules doesn't explicitly state that these threads aren't off-topic, anybody who regularly browses the board would know these threads have never been an issue (until they get derailed with petty girl drama maybe, but that happens to literally every thread ever on /cgl/). It's not as if these threads are wildly off-topic about shit like outer space and cars or something. They run along the same vein as the rest of our general discussion does.

>>284545
The real issue is not the supposed "off-topic" threads that have long been considered extremely on-topic, but that the board itself only encompasses two extremely narrow and niche Japan fashion subcultures. It's way too specific when there is a lot more that could be talked about. Perhaps there would be less shitposts, repeat topics and petty drama if the board had an officially broader topic of discussion. I suppose another issue would be that apparently our janitor right now has no idea what is mutually considered /cgl/ appropriate and it's creating an endless shitstorm.

I can't speak for the "omg good tripfags getting banned" topic though, I pay no attention to the circlejerks.

>>284545
I think they're asking for a mod that understands /cgl/. That won't happen, of course, but a janitor could happen. Honestly I think that it must be just some mod that stumbled upon there.

>>284571
>I think they're asking for a mod that understands /cgl/
This and an explanation from Moot on where the limits of cosplay and lolita-related threads end.

File: 1353117736646.jpg-(134 KB, 640x1023, 81471-lolita-moitie.jpg)

Also I'd like to add if you wanted to get VERY rule specific, the board name is "Cosplay and ELEGANT GOTHIC Lolita." Elegant gothic is such a retardedly specific kind of lolita that everything there is to say about it could probably literally be contained to one thread. Obviously the board discussion was not meant to be limited to this one very specific kind of lolita, but that's what it says right? That's the rule, right? We should delete every thread that does not pertain to specifically Elegant Gothic Lolitas, right?

Again, to repeat myself, this is why I feel that /cgl/ could deeply benefit from Moot giving the official okay that j-fashion and hair/face threads are NOT off-topic and should not be deleted. In fact, from what I've seen over the years, these threads tend to be actually the most helpful and dramaless. The name doesn't have to change, there should just be an additional rule/reminder on the board that these posts are fine so that maybe the janitor could stop ruining the board and that die-hard nay-sayers could stop shitposting with "OFF TOPIC" and reports.

Can we agree to NOT have kpop as an official part of cgl? It sounds like crap, the look all plastic, and it has nothing to do with cosplay or lolita.
Make up is relevant because cosplayers and lolitas use it. Jfash is relevant because styles can be mixed with lolita, or e.g grimoire stockings can be used for dolly or lolita.
But no more kpop god please no

>>284072 (OP)
>tripfag
>positive

hiv positive

>>284581
Now that you mention it, you are right. By the defaults rule sweet Lolita, classic, all of those are off-topic.
I wonder if upon hearing this, the new janitor will actually delete those threads too?

>>284545
Here's the problem

People make WAYW, makeup and J-fashion threads and get blasted by people saying "go to /fa/!" The problem is that /fa/ does not welcome these threads. Why should /cgl/ take in these extra threads when the more relevant board refuses to acknowledge a topic meant for them?

>>284716
Uh, /fa/ has WAYWT threads all the time, and yes, I know it's mostly men posting in them. It doesn't matter a bit.

>>284716
WAYW are not good threads. They are not at all as close to being board relevant as j-fashion and make-up are. Most of them turn into cam whoring sessions and petty fights anyway. I agree with >>284721, they already exist in /fa/ and should probably stay there.

>>284597
>>284357
I agree the drama and the kpop are terrible. "Baww, PT dramu threads arepart of /cgl" No, they're against the rules, go be catty bitches elsewhere.
>>284716
The problem with /fa is that it's all goth ninja, dadcore, masculine style. There's are hardly ever uselful concrit for girls. I like the WAYW and J-fash threads. The go hand in hand with wigs, costumes, care threads, etc.

>>284760
Do you know the rules of /cgl/?

>3. ALL DRAMA ALL THE TIME!

>>284819
But why though?

>>284829
Why what? Why drama? You're essentially inviting women to come together to discuss something. I think you can figure that part out.

Sometimes I think of /cgl/ a little like /mlp/ or /vp/. It's a bit of a cancer container. Do you think the rest of the boards want these people? We have had dramu and vendettas for a long time. They should stay. I even kind of like them

>>284844
>implying it contains them

It only contains the subject matter, you've probably discussed things with the cancer on multiple occasions without realizing. You may even have agreed with them on topics or found them to be of sound mind.

The only way to avoid the cancer is to leave.

Just change the board to Cosplay and J-Fashion.

>>284829
2. No Drama
3. Drama all the time
The rules are a bit of joke as you can see. But if you want a serious interpretation then #3 acknowledges that drama is part of the board culture. Rule #2 doesn't compel mods to act, it just gives them an excuse to act if the drama gets out of hand.

As for K-pop, threads used to pop up everywhere so clearly lots of people felt the need to discuss it. Unfortunately /mu/ hates K-pop and moot is reluctant to start a Korea board so one thread is the compromise. I'm fine with it, and I'm somebody who used to report that shit all the time.

Hey moot, can you make people less mean on /cgl/?

>>284597
We have a kpop thread once a month, I don't see a problem

>>285231
>>285160
It has absolutely nothing to do with the board. No kpop. No.