/q/ - /int/ Janitor

Anonymous (ID: SFJNoONO)
/int/ Janitor 11/13/12(Tue)18:08
No.280695

File: 1352848088288.png-(480 KB, 1904x2508, shit janitor.png)

/int/ Janitor Anonymous (ID: SFJNoONO) 11/13/12(Tue)18:08 No.280695

Replies: >>280725 >>280809 >>281495 >>281496

So moot, are you still going to say nothing about the horrible shit janitor that you have running a muck on /int/? Everyone on /int/ agrees, except for the janitor and the one antisemetic pole who pops up in every thread about /int/'s terrible janitor(the two of which may very well be one in the same), that the janitor is terrible and ruining /int/. You can reference this thread http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/224151/#230313 and the hundreds of others complaining about him as proof.

Here's another example, I post a simple thread about Israel nothing offensive. It got good responses none which were antisemitic, thread gets deleted. Make a thread again, gets deleted. Make it again and tell the janitor to fuck off because I know just like everyone else it's him who is doing it, gets deleted followed by a 12 minute block on posting. 12 minutes ends, so I ask a different but similar question, thread gets a few good replies again. Then it gets deleted, so I post it again and it gets deleted again followed by a ban from all boards for "spamming". It's considered "spamming" if the janitor deletes you thread that isn't against any rules, for no reason, and you repost? Would this happen if I asked this question about Argentina, Russia, America, or literally any other country in the world but Israel? Everyone who browses /int/ knows the answer to that question.

You know it'd be nice if you'd just give a straight up answer rather than ignoring this problem which is the main issue plaguing /int/. If you want to ban all discussion of Israel, jewish people, or whatever else the janitor isn't in the mood that's fine I'll even abide by them but have the decency to actually add them to the list of rules. Everyone on /int/ is tired of this and tired of the non-responses that they're getting. Seriously the fuck is up with this?

Anonymous (ID: UBOJSacR)
11/13/12(Tue)18:10
No.280697

Anonymous (ID: UBOJSacR) 11/13/12(Tue)18:10 No.280697

Janitors can't ban you, turbonerd.

Anonymous (ID: 28xXZvuo)
11/13/12(Tue)18:37
No.280725

Anonymous (ID: 28xXZvuo) 11/13/12(Tue)18:37 No.280725

>>280695 (OP)
>You know it'd be nice if you'd just give a straight up answer rather than ignoring this problem which is the main issue plaguing /int/

I usually have no qualms with 4chan, its administration, rules, policies, or moderation staff, but I second this whole-heartedly.

If the 4chan staff has an issue with something, address it. Don't just block it and ignore the questions until they go away. If you're going to take a stance for or against something, take a stance for or against it, don't just try to block it and hope it goes away, that's the most chickenshit solution you can have.

Anonymous (ID: kq201p5e)
11/13/12(Tue)18:47
No.280740

Anonymous (ID: kq201p5e) 11/13/12(Tue)18:47 No.280740

Replies: >>280742

Don't you know the JIDF controls moot?

Anonymous (ID: IKQPcPv9)
11/13/12(Tue)18:48
No.280742

Anonymous (ID: IKQPcPv9) 11/13/12(Tue)18:48 No.280742

>>280740
It took 40 minutes for someone to say JIDF in an /int/ thread?

Damn, ya'll ... losin' yer touch.

Anonymous (ID: iQR0dyW4)
11/13/12(Tue)18:54
No.280754

Anonymous (ID: iQR0dyW4) 11/13/12(Tue)18:54 No.280754

File: 1352850870773.gif-(937 KB, 160x240, Kebab.gif)

The /int/ Janitor needs to be removed from the premises.

Anonymous (ID: oHscCNNN)
11/13/12(Tue)19:00
No.280760

Anonymous (ID: oHscCNNN) 11/13/12(Tue)19:00 No.280760

4chans moderation has been getting alot worse lately, its not just /int/ its cross site.
Moot holds 0 power anymore this place is controlled by someone else.

Anonymous (ID: +bAJ8nfS)
11/13/12(Tue)19:08
No.280778

Anonymous (ID: +bAJ8nfS) 11/13/12(Tue)19:08 No.280778

Jews jewing out again

fuck off shlomo

nobody is buying your kike lies again

Anonymous (ID: egjPcJm9)
11/13/12(Tue)19:10
No.280781

Anonymous (ID: egjPcJm9) 11/13/12(Tue)19:10 No.280781

Yeah can you do something about /int/'s terrible janitor? For fucks sake. His deletions are detrimental to the quality of the board.

Anonymous (ID: 2ZDkp8bx)
11/13/12(Tue)19:11
No.280785

Anonymous (ID: 2ZDkp8bx) 11/13/12(Tue)19:11 No.280785

Replies: >>280800

it works like this:

to contain common threads considered bad, threads containing banned words in the opening post will either autosage or get autodeleted after a random amount of time (from a few seconds to several minutes). If you start threads with banned words consecutevely after being deleted, you'll get autobanned.
you can try reposting this threads about israel but changing keywords like 'jewish' or 'israel' to 'j3wish' or '1srael' and you''l see that your threads wont get auto deleted and you wont get autobanned.
everything was automatic, no mod/janitors were involved in your b&.

Anonymous (ID: SFJNoONO)
11/13/12(Tue)19:29
No.280800

Anonymous (ID: SFJNoONO) 11/13/12(Tue)19:29 No.280800

Replies: >>280802

>>280785
If it's automatic why does the time it takes to get deleted vary? Sometimes threads will stay up for hours and get plenty of replies before they get taken down.

Anonymous (ID: 2ZDkp8bx)
11/13/12(Tue)19:31
No.280802

Anonymous (ID: 2ZDkp8bx) 11/13/12(Tue)19:31 No.280802

>>280800
it's because of a combination of keywords. i don't know which words are banned on /int/. the threads that lasted several hours didn't include banned words/combinations of words

Anonymous (ID: 1O6/1naS)
11/13/12(Tue)19:49
No.280809

Anonymous (ID: 1O6/1naS) 11/13/12(Tue)19:49 No.280809

Replies: >>281388

>>280695 (OP)

Yes, yes it is.

It's considered spam.

Also you are ban evading so get ready to be banned again.

Anonymous (ID: SFJNoONO)
11/14/12(Wed)03:27
No.281388

Anonymous (ID: SFJNoONO) 11/14/12(Wed)03:27 No.281388

>>280809
Oh look the same pole that shows up in every thread. Also learn how to read bans.

Anonymous (ID: 0ALGzizp)
11/14/12(Wed)06:44
No.281495

Anonymous (ID: 0ALGzizp) 11/14/12(Wed)06:44 No.281495

>>280695 (OP)

OP: since you have evidence, please take this to IRC and/or email moot; i'm pretty sure they ignore /int/ threads on /q/.

I'm guessing that the mod who banned you did not have time to verify the janitor's report. but now you have proof.

however, if you do something like this again, DO NOT criticize the janitor in any way. that is a rule violation that only serves to lessen your credibility.

Anonymous (ID: VuN85kGM)
11/14/12(Wed)06:49
No.281496

Anonymous (ID: VuN85kGM) 11/14/12(Wed)06:49 No.281496

>>280695 (OP)
Sadly moot doesn't care and it's unlikely he ever will. Just use codewords when you want to discuss controverted material.
"Do you consider cubism to be a western art movement?" "What will be the impact of our current fatmaster on cubism?"

If you are having trouble accessing images at images.4chan.org, please see this post: *click*

If you are having trouble accessing images at images.4chan.org, please see this post: click