can we please get Roasted Bread!AHEROmI.qg permabanned?he's already had one trip permabanned, but he never posts anything related to threads, everyone hates him, and anywhere he posts gets almost immediately derailed.
>Do not request bans for users, these will also be ignored and removed. If a user is breaking a rule, report their posts. If a user is a known ban evader, report their posts.report himand remember as always, friendship is magic
>>117953he's been banned, he's evaded bans, he's been permabanned, and reporting apparently does nothing except get the threads he posts in 404'd after 4 hours.the janitors on /co/ are bloody terrible.
>>117960>>>/co/39946821just an example of his posting.every thread he posts in is like this. there is little to no discussion on topic, and even if people ignore him, he just replies to himself and avatarfags.
>>117960then just be patient and when the time comes ("soon"), apply to be a janitor and do a good job
He still hasn't left. He made this thread that lasted 200 posts or so.The thread had nothing to do with /co/ at all.
>>118037Does /co/ know how to filter tripfags?
>>118048Filtering is a placebo. It doesn't solve the problem.
I would seriously recommend just having janiors be informed to delete any and all posts made by Roasted or with the Nichijou avatarfag, who may or may not be the same person.The latter is the most persistent piece of shit I've ever seen. He's currently ruining a "/co/ characters I can do the voice for" thread because the OP posted a picture of Tentomon. When told Moot allows Digimon, he calls him full of shit. When said he is avatarfagging, he says its okay because he didnt start the thread. When said his avatar is /a/, he says he has an /a/ tab openso its okay, then says that the same logic doesn't work for others, THEN says he never said that.I'm not even being trolled, I'm just pissed that this fuck can ruin an entire fucking thread on a whim. Hell, it might be multiple people.
Oh manIt would be awesome if you could filter trips, I wonder why nobody has invented anything like thatOh well
>>118067But why waste the Janitors time with petty posts that could be easily ignored with the proper filter or your own will?Shouldn't the janitors be in charge of deleting NSFW and off-topic threads?Deleting comments doesn't help at all.
>>118067>>>/co/39948871This thread right? Now it's just him arguing with people. There is no discussion. OP should just delete his thread and try again.
Another /co/ user here.Roasted is a cancerous entity. If he were just a shitposter, people would ignore him, it's the fact that he manages to get under so many people's skin just from opening his fat mouth that's made him a Cannes level threat to the board, if you pardon my overly dramatic affection for the board itself.As was said, he evades any ban placed upon him, though I don't know if that's a matter of mod efficiency - He's the worst kind of user; Smug, arrogant, and knows what he's doing. He barely ever contributes to a thread when he enters a pre-existing one, and the ones he starts are all about him and how "He looks like George Clooney and is swimming in pussy" or "He's the paragon of decency and the saviour of the board, we should be lucky to have him since he's so well liked on /mu/"Example: A Captain Britain thread ages and ages ago that I started. Knew it wasn't going to be a huge thread, but we discussed continuity errors and such involving the character. Bitch Potter comes rolling in and starts trying to troll based on nationality. Thread devolves. Don't even try to say it's up to the users to filter or ignore him, because every answer or reply you see to a missing poster reads the same; All in his direction, and it feeds his ego more.TL;DR - He's a cancerous troll who evades permabans. If our mods can't stop him, we need to go to a higher power.
>>118091Okay, I'll give you that with Roasted. But you can't filter the avatarfag. They're anon, and if you can filter the images they can just change a pixel or the size.
>>118068>>118091Me again.Ain't it pretty fucking ironic that this guy here is posting reaction images just like Roasted in this thread:>>>/co/39948871Call me paranoid, but... That's pretty suspect of the guy posting the worst advice: Like a mother who tells her son to just ignore the bullies who are sexually abusing him.
>>118116What if we ignore their image and only care for their comment?Even better!What if we ignore him completely?!>>118125You are a master of deduction but you might be wrongWho knows?
>>118130>What if we ignore him completely?He still wouldn't go away, would he?That's not be being a pessimist. Ignoring him would only make him step up his efforts and/or pump his ego more that no-one was fighting back, and the only references to him would be "Just ignore him". That's gratifying enough to a guy like him.
>>118130I do personally. I don't reply and I try to report every post they make. It's that their very presence in a thread can ruin it, either by agitating those that can't restrain themselves with faulty logic or by wasting the image limit in threads, ESPECIALLY Drawthreads that needs that, accompanied usually by whiny requests of the avatar character (Mio I believe, haven't watched Nichijou myself). Granted, that usually leads to hilarious pictures of characters beating the shit out of them.
>>118116the avatarfag is roasted. he forgot to take his trip off a few days ago while being it.
>>118168Roasted isn't him actually. They're 2 different people. Roasted just adopted the avatar to fuck with /co/.
>>118145>He still wouldn't go away, would he?Why would he? This place is free, right?If ignoring is not the solution you want to use (for those silly reasons you said) why not try to just take account of his comment before start screaming like a rape victim?>>118147Why report it? What are you trying to achieve with that? If you want to report something, report off-topic stuff or NSFW picturesDO you really believe that deleting posts and banning people will help anything? Even ignoring him is silly, just read his comment and if you care, answer it, if not, just ignore itLike with any poster>ESPECIALLY Drawthreads that needs thatIs almost impossible for a Drawthread to reach image limit, it would first reach posts limit.
I like Roasted, the avatarfag, and JLH simply because there mere presents sends a wave of pure anger down the spines of others.
He's shitting up /mu/ as well.
>>118176go away bitch potter.
>>118186I'm not Roasted, you double nigger. Although thank you for the compliment, I have been working out.
>>118194roasted is a fatass you retard, no matter how much he tries to claim the pictures that other tripfag posts are of him.
>>118174Just because somewhere is free, doesn't mean people want you there.If he wanted us to ignore him, he'd drop the trip forever and not post in such a predictable pattern that people would realise who he was. Then he could say what he liked and fade into the sea of blank faces like the rest of us.
>>118176>>118186>>118194>>118201See what I mean?I really hope someone with clout is actually paying attention to this thread.
>>118207Silly anonI wasn't talking about the tripfag, a trip can be easily filtered>>118223Hardly.
>>118230You know, I'd hoped this board wasn't what I thought it was; A passive attempt by the powers-that-be to stop floods of useless emails of problems, suggestions and inter-board bitching.But even by reading the thread and posting here, I'm really not solving the problem. I'm just going to go back and do just what you suggested; Ignore it, go along for the ride by not doing anything and stop adding fuel to the fire. Hell, there'll be another boatload of suckers to do that without even thinking about it.Troll on, you magnificent cunt.
>>118091>But why waste the Janitors time with petty posts that could be easily ignored with the proper filter or your own will?the precedent's already there. /j/ had threads targeting shitposting users
>>118288What if...Just listen to me for a secondWhat if we use this board to find solution to problems and discuss how over come them rather than using it for bitching and call for banns/deletions?An obvious solution for the tripfag would just teach everyone to use filters, maybe a quick guide posted here?>>118316That sure is a waste of time, following a random guy in the internet and deleting his comments, why not use that time to delete NSFW and off-topic stuff? Would help the board more, I tell you that.
>>118361What if...Just listen to me for a secondWhat if you left 4chan and never return? I'm sure it'll be a little better place without you.
>>118442I don't see why.
>>118471nono, I think that guy has a good idea.you're obviously a shitposter, and I think 4chan will benefit without your kind.
My problem with Avatarfags is that it's really not that hard to just stop avatarfagging. If you just stopped, it wouldn't explode into such a problem.Pic related. On /co/ I would occasionally avatarfag as the Question. I stopped immediately after the rule was made, and only use the images when posting links to the O'neil run of the Question.If you can't just stop avatarfagging you need help and a new set of reaction images.
Why can't /co/ mods and janitors do their jobs?
>>118499they're too preoccupied banning people over posting one or two boobs instead of things that are actually detrimental to /co/.
>>118498I love Question.
>>118499Janitors ARE doing their jobs. His posts get deleted normally. Credit where credit is due.
>>118478But I am just discussing the problem with shitposters on /co/I assure you that these two wouldn't be the last ones, why not learn to deal with them now?Better than bitching to the mods (who will probably ignore you at the end)>>118499What jobs?Delete comments?Ban people who will probably get off easily?Make stickies?>>118507NSFW is still against the rules, I doubt shitposter who can be easily ignored should be above NSFW or off-topic stuff when it comes to priorities
>>118516Avatarfagging is still against the rules
>>118516but cant nsfw and offtopic stuff be ignored too?
>>118507/co/ doesn't have a mod. We have a janitor that's overworked because of the avatarfag
>>118525Of course they can, why put them above the shitposters then?Off-topic and NSFW harms the board as much as a random guy making a false statement to enrage people.>>118536I wonder if he would be less "overworked" if he were to ignore petty posts and start to clean the board properly.
>>118551you mean by banning rulebreakers who avatarfag, like you and roasted bread?
>>118558I don't think Janitors can ban and I doubt banning does anything to someone like the tripfag, it seems that banning him just makes him happy or something like that.What if we just post a "Guide" to install and use properly the filter?
Avatar fag.You complain about the rules not being followed. But you ignore rules you don't like. You are just as bad as "fetish thread" creators.
>>118636Then why they don't get the same treatment as the Avatar fag??Because they post the shit that the janitor wanks to?
You guys sure are envious of Roasted. Perhaps you should grow up
>>118644Because it's /co/ related. Faggot.
>>118644because it's comics and cartoons
>>118648>>118653That's not trueThey always post non-/co/ related stuff, it always happen and most of the time it ends with NSFW material.I think I saw some Brown girl thread that it's already filled with anime and video games characters, I am also sure it has NSFW stuff.
>>118677Except that it is. All of the porn is /co/ related. Brown girls are /co/ related. If non /co/ images get posted in the thread, that's not their fault.
>>118677>people posting things that are usually /co/ related is worse than me who posts nothing /co/ related
Honestly, Roasted Bread occasionally makes a decent post. Yunocchi is a 100% shitposter though. I've never seen him make a single board related non-shitpost. He needs to be dealt with before RB.>inb4 yuno is a she
>>118703Except that it is not.All of the porn is not always /co/ related and a blue board doesn't allow porn, are you dumb?Brown girls are only /co/ related if they are from western cartoons or comics, not anime or video games.They never bother to tell people to stay on-topic, they obviousy don't care what it gets posted, they encourage off-topic material.Why not make the thread on /b/? You can post brown girls from anywhere.
>>118718Yuno is my wife, though.
>>118718He might make a few mediocre posts, but that doesn't mean that most of his posts aren't pure shitIt's really tiring to see so many people unhappy with the shit he pulls and yet he isn't banned
>>118742Go to bed Roasted.
Mods can't ban him, he'll just evade it.Not everyone uses 4chanX, so there will always be people responding to his posts.The only logical course of action is to filter his trip.
>>119858thisputting lanced jack in the name field automatically bans you.
bump, because I really think this is a problem that should be brought to light.
>>119858>he'll just evade itGo try to post on 4chan using a proxy. Try it out, seriously. It's not that simple.
There should be a way to ban certain tripcodes.If we could instaban his precious !AHEROlm.qg tripcode, maybe he'd get the message.
>>>118098>CannesHaha, jeez. That fucking autist. While we're at it, can we please ban ID:KM2pCHpD for avatarfagging?
>>120444ban evasion is a lot easier to do than you think.
Honestly, there are worse trolls on 4chan. He is INCREDIBLY easy to counter-troll, and his ego-maniacal rantings are occasionally funny, especially if pic related is true. I don't appreciate his off-topic posting though.
Bitch potter is the reason I started filtering some tripfag, he's never on topic, shitpost constantly and reply to himself. The guy a lonely autistic and egotistical fools living in his own crazy world, he belong on a board like /x/ or another website. It's not funny anymore, ban !AHEROlm.qg and his succeeding trips please
>>118098Captain Britain threads always derail. Some posts the scan of him throwing a bottle of whiskey at Meggan and the shit blows up. I remember that thread, it was a complete shitstorm
>>118067>I'm not even being trolledYes you are. By discussing him and replying to him you are ensuring he continues. Until the rest of /co/ realises this, and reports and ignores, he is never going away.
>>120495Really, if you take everything he says as a joke, he's not even a troll at all. Just someone with a somewhat annoying sense of humor.
>>118068>>118091>>118644>>118677>>118731>>118742Seriously though, Avatarfag how are you any better. You will always cause someone to complain and then the shit starts.That is why I filter you out, not because you are so annoying. Mostly due to the shitstorm you cause
>>120539Nobody is better, anonSome are just easier to filter.
/mu/ handles him pretty well, why is he such a big problem over at /co/?
>>121190/co/ is like /v/ when it comes to self control
>>121196yet you keep saying the solution is to ignore him? and without self control how would /co/ could get rid of him? are you saying /co/ deserves him?
>>121201You deserve him if you're incapable of not getting angry over a barely abrasive troll poster.
>>121201Ignoring him is not the only solution, you could also learn to filter him or "counter-troll" him with his embarrassing obesity.That's why the best idea would to make a quick Guide to filter shitposters rather than waste time bitching about him.>are you saying /co/ deserves him?Yeah, probably.
>>121203And why don't you make that guide?Maybe we would say "thank you"
>>121203yeaaah, i filter him actually, and there are several guides made. But the things every once in a while i get in a legit thread that, at least half of all the posts are hidden cause everyone replies to him, you post the guide (this is not the actual guide i don't know where i left him) but the thread is already shit. Go to another legit thread and it's shit again.
>>121203now he claims that he's actually this tripfag.
>>121211Why should I bother?I find quite pathetic the need to filter anything besides spambots.If /co/ is so desperate to hide the ugly words of that fat bag, they will make the guide if they wish to improve the quality of the board.>>121219The idea is not posting the guide in every thread, is making a sticky with it in /co/ or /q/ so people can easily see it.Maybe if more people learn to filter him, less threads will be derailed into "Let's call the fat fuck a fat fuck"
>>121225i like the idea of a sticky.Also don't call us pathetic, that's mean :(
/^!AHEROmI\.qg$/;op:yes;stub:no
>>121225Why do you think shitposting is less of an issue than NSFW or off-topic threads? If anything, derailing legitimate discussion is worse than having things that shouldn't be on the board.
>>121242Exactly. A nsfw dump thread doesn't hurt any legit discussion occuring, shitposting can take a great topic and instantly run it into the ground.It happens with such frequency, why even bother posting with an avatar if you know it will destroy topics? Or posting as a well know, as in hated, trip?The only real excuse is thriving on negative attention and WANTING to shit post, that's the problem. Don't tell us to compensate because someone else wants to use the public discussion space to get their e-peen enlarged.
Actually guys, why do imagelimits exists? If you can have 1000 posts per thread, why not have 1000 images?I know it is offtopic but....
This asshole will just not go away. He's a fucking blight I swear to god, and has ruined more threads than I have hair.Hiding him doesn't fix the problem, since it just covers it up, much like Febreeze doesn't fix a smell. He's even Avatarfagging in this thread AND NO ONE IS DOING SHIT ABOUT IT.WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS.
>>121242I don't think it's less of an issue, I think all are an issue and should be treated equallyWhile NSFW content doesn't derail threads always (Though it does some times when the thread is filled with hungry virgins asking for more) it's still illegal in a blue board, there is plenty of boards and websites where you can get and post porn, why use /co/? Do you have the need to wank with your /co/mrads?Off-topic shit is a big problem too, not because it's just off-topic but because it encourages more and more and more off-topic threads in the board until /co/ becomes "That board where you can post whatever the fuck you want", just like how /v/ was.Shitposting is a problem indeed, but so it is NSFW dumps and Off-topic threads/material.A janitor shouldn't ignore NSFW or Off-topic stuff just to delete some posts of a shitposterHe should just purge the thread
>>121261Well, that's why we need a /wp/ board, so those posts have a place to go. However, I think getting rid of shitposting should take precedence over getting rid of off-topic.
>>121264Why not get ride of both?None of those things are helping the board, why keep one and ignore the other one?
>>118068>>118091>>118174>>118361>>118471>>118551>>118619>>118644>>118647>>118677>>118731>>121184>>121196>>121203>>121225>>121261>>121276>probably missed somehttps://www.4chan.org/rules#global>13. Do not use avatars or attach signatures to your posts.Between this, and asking for something expressly forbidden in a sticky this thread is premium fucking content.
>>121248Because a thread with more than a couple hundred images becomes slow to load and strains 4chan servers.On another note, if avatarfagging is against the rules, how come this thread is going for 20+ hours?
Not simple, but not impossible.Notice how Roasted/avatar guy's ID changes from KM2pCHpD in >>118731 to FGfVgptr in >>121184 and onwards.
>>121261>He should just purge the threadNice idea I support that
>>121299In reply to >>120444
Another /co/ user here, I heard there was a thread over here so I came to check it out. I'll try to lay out why I feel this guy is such a problem.1. Avatarfagging is against the rules.2. The avatar is an /a/ character (maybe not a huge problem in places like /mu/, but /co/ is probably the only place on 4chan where anime is explicitly off topic)3. Goes in to /co/ related threads (sonic, fan art, digimon, and many more) and starts to call people out on rulebreaking, sometimes when they're not breaking rules, while flagrantly breaking several himself with every post he makes. 4. Harassed someone for the length of a thread to delete a harmless, on topic post, because he felt it did not contribute to a good discussion. The person in question did not seem to be in the thread any longer, but avatarfag continued to mmake angry posts about it for the whole thread. 5. He isn't tripping, so filtering him is labor intensive. You need to filter him and anybody twho replies to him every time he makes a non-chained post.6. So far, reporting him has done no good. That is why I feel we need mod level power to do an Ip ban on him. I don't care if he is or is not roasted bread, he is a serious problem that's a detriment to the board.
>>121319Oh boy!Just look at that list!Also, I am pretty sure Digimon is an anime and that Sonic is a Video game character, unless you are talking about Sonic's comic, he is obviously off-topic.
>>121319Dude let me tell you, why you are mad about >>121322[spoiler]he's right[/spoiler]
>>121322Digimon (and Dragonball) is widely accepted on /co/, you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who'd object to it there.
>>121319No need to be this mad, /co/ mods are notoriously slow
>>121337I am sorry if I don't understand but, isn't Digimon and DBZ anime?I am pretty sure there is a board for Anime and Manga, and there is even a Random board that could do the jobAlso, what you mean with "widely accepted" could be easily just a loud minority.
>>121337not the least of whom being moot, who has explicitly said that digimon and DBZ are allowed on /co/, and that janitors aren't allowed to delete on-topic digimon/dbz threads.
>>121322Completely seriously Digimon has been allowed on /co/ for ages and ages.Characters like Sonic appear in many different forms of media- video games, comics, cartoons. How can you limit discussion of a character to only their appearances in one form of media? Can people discuss the marvel v capcom video game? Can they talk about character.portrayals and accuracy of powers? It's still /co/ related.
>>121319You forgot harassing artists in drawthreads to draw his character and then getting mad when they didn't do what he asked.
>>121346I am pretty sure Digimon threads weren't allowed to be deleted in /a/ either, and I don't remember him mentioning DBZAlso, I am pretty sure Moot gives two damns about /co/ and barely browses it, how would he know what's the best for the board if he doesn't know it? From my point of view, he said that about Digimon just to get rid of an annoying idiot bitching about Digimon rather than talking with the Janitors in /a/.Do you want /co/ to be the dumpster of other boards?>>121356Because if you want to discuss Sonic video games, there is /v/ and if you want to discuss Sonic comics and cartoons, there is /co/You can discuss Western characters from comics and cartoons in /co/, not Western characters with comics and cartoonsIf we are going to use that retarded logic you are mentioning, you could discuss almost everything in /v/ because it has a video game.
>>121371I think the fact still remains that you're complaining about people complaining about breaking rules and ruining the quality of /co/......while picking and choosing what rules should be followed YOURSELF.
>>121371>>121378 What the other guy said.Fuck off Bread, you're not wanted anywhere.
>>117947>>9>Do not request bans for users, these will also be ignoredit the very first sticky on this fucking board, for christ's sake!
>>121371The sonic thread in question was a fan art thread. You can't really say for sure which incarnation of the character it was drawn for.And the point isn't that we should always be allows to discuss video games, just that certain video games aren't totally on topic. My argument is based on the guide that was posted in /v/ by moot. Tangentially related topics are okay, as long as they don't get out of hand. Stuff like Sonic and arvel v Capcom, as long as the discussion sticks toward the character side and not the video game side, it should be okay.Also, you've failed to address ALL my other complaints.
>>121387Aren't totally off topic*
>>118037And it got deleted.In order you get rid of annoying posters, there is one mantra:Do not reply. Report, hide and ignore.Going "I do, but no one else does" is not helping. no matter how many replies are there do not reply yourself. There is no better way to make a tripfaggot or avatarfag look pathetic by having a thread/board not acknowledging him.
>>121391The only thread I saw where he eventually went away was a HSG thread, but he still hung out for several -hours- complaining about a post whose poster was obviously not in the thread. No one acknowledged him, but he still went on for a very very long time. Perhaps he only needs gratification from one thread to fuel the rest of him?Regardless, the only reason this sort of thread has become necessary is because /co/ really only has a janitor, ans the problem has gone beyond that one poor soul's scope.
>>121387Sonic characters are /v/ related, you can talk and fap all you want to them in /v/ because they are characters from a video gameSonic threads always end up about the Video games, alwaysThere might be mention of the comics and cartoons but it always ends up about the Video games or the Video game characters and that is not /co/ relatedYou are acting like the guys who make those furry threads "It's okay as long as we post SFW images and /co/ related characters" but it always ends up with non-/co/ related characters and porn because THERE IS NO DISCUSSION IN IMAGE DUMPS so the thread needs to find fuel from off-topic material>Also, you've failed to address ALL my other complaints.I obviously don't care about them.
>>121404Well, it's a start.
>>121407Okay, those threads are flawed. But the avatarfag should not be allowed to self-police a board according to his preferences. He should not be able to pick and choose what kind of rule breaking is allowed, and which kinds should be ignored. At the very least those threads, even if discussion deviates, would be totally peaceful and self contained if it weren't for this guy.
>>121420I doubt he thinks any rule should be broken, I don't remind him saying something like that>At the very least those threads, even if discussion deviates, would be totally peaceful and self contained if it weren't for this guy.So, you are saying that we should let off-topic threads and NSFW threads run freely just because we don't want to bother them?Remember when there was only "Caturday"?If we just let them keep posting more and more off-topic shit or more and more NSFW material, /co/ will just end up like "The board where you can post whatever the fuck you want" wich will lead /co to become /b/
>>121426You are greatly exaggerating the problem of off topics or NSFW stuff. Plus, this thread isn't to discuss the general state of /co/, but rather one particular user that is shitting up a board. We don't need to choose between this guy and getting rid of inappropriate threads. This guy is just the worse of the two evils, imo, because he ruins good threads too.There are plenty of people who report NSFW threads and try to steer off topic stuff back on topic. This guy goes about it the worst way, while breaking numerous rules himself, and is generally just a huge fucking weeping pus sore on the face of /co/
Roasted Bread is the avatarfag that you are arguing with right now.Just thought you should know.His act of "being the hero /co/ deserves" got tired when people started treating him like a regular person and stopped overreacting to his hyperbolic bullshit. So he created this new persona after teh avatarfag rule was added and has been playing it out for weeks, always using the same general excuses and bullshit.>Complaining about fetish threads on /co/>Exaggerating the actual problems to divert attention away from a topic>Insisting he's not being an avatarfag and merely using a reaction image>Insisting reaction images are no different than avatars without acknowledging the obvious wrongness of that idea.>Constantly changing thread IDs in a single thread because he keeps getting banned. Then insists it was a connection issue.At this point, I'm not so much in favor of calling for a ban as I am for finding a more reliable way to ban people and keep them banned.
>>121437>You are greatly exaggerating the problem of off topics or NSFW stuff. Hohoho noI am not, that's how off-topic and NSFW material affect a board, it starts with some threads here and there then it gets bigger and bigger and more annoying and more hard to stop.>Plus, this thread isn't to discuss the general state of /co/, but rather one particular user that is shitting up a board.Problem wich has a easy solution that has been mentioned a lot of times in this thread and it shouldn't be discussed hereI would rather discuss how improve the quality of /co/ rather than waste another thread in calling a fat fuck a fat fuck>We don't need to choose between this guy and getting rid of inappropriate threads.Indeed, we shouldn'tBoth of them should be taken care of with equality. Why waste time and give attention to just a retard while ignoring other problems?
>>121474I understand that problems like off-topic and NSFW threads can snowball, but right now that stuff isn't out of control. It doesn't need to be ignored until it IS out of control, but the avatarfag IS out of control. And as previously mentioned, its nearly impossible to filter the guy. Every time he makes a post that isn't chained to his first post, its a whole new process. And people should not NEED to download extensions to get rid of him. By the same logic, why can't this single gentleman filter the threads he doesn't like instead of shitting up the whole board.>Both of them should be taken care of with equalityOkay, cool. I agree, all rules should be treated equally. To me, posting /a/ images in /co/ IS JUST AS BAD as posting NSFW stuff. Rules are rules are rules. >Why waste time and give attention to just a retard while ignoring other problemsThat doesn't sound like what you just said. But anyway, we need to waste time and attention on him because he's out of control. Getting rid of him WOULD improve the quality of /co/.
>>121447>more reliable way to ban peopleWhy not combine it with the idea of a 4chan gold account?You'll need one to post under a trrip, and if he gets out of control they simply suspend his account.
>>121523> but right now that stuff isn't out of control.So it needs to be out of control to get the attention it deserves? Don't you think it's better to keep those threads controlled before they become a "real" problem?>And as previously mentioned, its nearly impossible to filter the guy. And as previously mentioned, ignoring him is another way to do it>And people should not NEED to download extensions to get rid of him. Indeed, they shouldn'tThey can do that on their own by just ignoring his posts>Rules are rules are rules. And yet, a janitor would let off-topic threads run wild as long as he deletes the reaction pics of a blue haired girl on them.>That doesn't sound like what you just said.What do you mean it doesn't? Why ignore a problem to focus in another? Why not take care of both of them?>Getting rid of him WOULD improve the quality of /co/.You can't get rid of him, you either, accept this and learn to deal with it or bitch until he leaves.>>121538Accounts are for fags
>>121543>Accounts are for fagsIt won't even affect you as long as you as long as you don't get suspended as Roasted.
>>121543Off-topic threads can be amusing.Your childish attention whoring with Nichijou pictures is just irritating.>You can't get rid of himYou're not the first faggot to claim to be unbannable.
Last night, someone posted his personal information in a thread made about just him on /co/. That's stalking, inciting a raid, and making off-topic threads like this one. That needs to stop.
>>121568>Off-topic threads can be amusing.Is that supposed to be an excuse for them?>You're not the first faggot to claim to be unbannable.Nobody mentioned bans, I said that you can't get rid of shitposters, you either learn to deal with them or you just keep bitching for the rest of your life.Waiting for mods and janitors to delete their comments because it hurts your eyes is just pathetic and meaningless.
>>121625Offtopic threads and NSFW are okay, if you can break the rules and not be punished, so do they.Just learn to hide and ignore threads. Waiting for the mods and janitors to delete their comments because it hurts your eyes is just pathetic and meaningless. So stop bitching about fetish threads, just hide then and get on with your life.
>>121655>Offtopic threads and NSFW are okay, if you can break the rules and not be punished, so do they.Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>>121659>I have no argument so I will just laugh at him so people may think I'm right.
I think the fact that we tolerate him so well at /mu/ says more about the state of the board than about Roasted
>Avatarfag rule STILL not being enforced by modsJanitors are trying. I've noticed that. By why haven't we had a single public ban of him? That's all we want. Is that asking to much?
>>121666It's okay, I don't want to face your flawless logic here.Maybe you are right, maybe nobody should be punished for breaking the rules just because one guy "isn't" punished.
>>121687They do enforce it but if he ban evades all the time, there isn't much that they can do.
>>121543>So it needs to be out of control to get the attention it deservesSeriously, did you not even read the next sentence? I say right there "It doesn't need to be ignored until it IS out of control." Its a problem, but its not as large of a problem as he/you are. Ignore him? Okay- you just ignore all the NSFW and off topic shit. If shouldn't bother you if you just ignore it, right? You can just skim by it and it won't effect the quality of /co/ because you're ignoring him. >janitor would let off-topic threads run wild as long as he deletes the reaction pics of a blue haired girl on themMaybe the janitor is following the same off-topic guidelines that I am- there are tiers of relation to /co/, and some of them don't hurt /co/ at all. Let me just post this file for you, so you can better understand how talking about /co/ characters appearing in different forms of media can be considered as GOOD for /co/. If these rules can apply to /v/, there's no reason they shouldn't apply to /co/ as well. If you believe that off-topic and this asshat need to be dealt with equally, then you can't turn around and say that dealing with this asshat is a waste of time. And if my choices are accepting him and all the fucking drama, shitposting, and flagrant rulebreaking OR bitching until he leaves- I'd much rather bitch until he leaves.
>>122044>It has taken about 100 posts for this post to come along and correctly articulate to the avatarfag what everyone is trying to sayOn that note, thank you anon.
This thread is the epitome of how this board sucks. A guy, avatarfagging and no mod does shit about it.
>>122063Look at his ID. Either mods have been banning him and he evades, or he has a bunch of friends who type just like him.
>>122044>Seriously, did you not even read the next sentence?I thought it didn't make sense>Its a problem, but its not as large of a problem as he/you are. But it will get bigger and bigger to the point that not even shitposters will matter, why not treat it like a real problem now before it's too late?>Ignore him? Okay- you just ignore all the NSFW and off topic shit..That's just silly, of course it will affect the quality of the board, the off-topic threads and NSFW dumps are still there, you are just covering them with your thumbIgnoring it will just make it bigger and bigger> Let me just post this file for you...Sure, there is nothing wrong about talking about /co/ characters in other media, as long you keep talking about those /co/ charactersFor example, a Marvel vs Capcom threadIf you want to post the /co/ characters and their new costumes, it's allright, it's /co/ relatedBut when you start to discuss the game and the entire thread goes on and on like a fightan general, the it's not /co/ related.>If these rules can apply to /v/, there's no reason they shouldn't apply to /co/ as well. Well, yeah, this is another thing/co/ is not /v/>If you believe that off-topic and this asshat need to be dealt with equally, then you can't turn around and say that dealing with this asshat is a waste of time. I am saying that the janitors and moderators shouldn't focus in just the asshat, they should focus in the asshat and the rest of the problems, wich they seem to forget>And if my choices are accepting him and all the fucking drama, shitposting, and flagrant rulebreaking OR bitching until he leaves- I'd much rather bitch until he leaves.Join the line, bro.
>>118037lol he did that on /mu/ and it said something something !IORETARD or somethingfuck him regardlessalso OP just, as mentioned before, report and ignore
>>122141you know, talking about breaking the rules leading to the stagnation of the board is all well and good, but when you yourself are doing the exact same thing, you lose any and all credibility.>/co/ is not /v/no, but the same rules can and do apply. stretching to make a thread work is shitposting.breaking global rules(ie. global rule 13) is shitposting.making a thread about yourself that has nothing to do with comics or cartoons is shitposting.defending threads like that or suggesting people just filter that shitposter is shitposting.trolling is shitpostingpretending one problem can just be ignored while another problem(which is not at all a problem in most cases) needs to be addressed immediately, is shitposting.
>>122141>But it will get bigger and bigger...Why do you keep deflecting? It's already been stated, the vast majority sees avatar fagging and shit posting as a worse problem than slightly off-topic threads.>That's just silly...Ignoring it will just make it bigger and biggerIt's incredible how you managed to miss his point and at the same time basically confirm "Yes I am going to be a bigger problem if you don't deal with me">Sure, there is nothing wrong about talking about /co/ characters in other media...This is just so incredibly retarded. It would be like saying "/v/ can discuss comics based on video games, BUT IF THEY SAY ONE WORD ABOUT SOMETHING NOT FROM THE GAME I'M REPORTING FOR OFF-TOPIC SHITPOSTING!". Or to take this form of logic to a more simple idea, it would be like calling talking about Marvel in a DC thread shit posting if the topic came up naturally through relations to the previous topic.>Well, yeah, this is another thing/co/ is not /v/No, but the rules are the same idiot. Both are boards based on an interest and have incredibly similar rules, they talk games we talk comics, the only difference is in poster quality.>I am saying that the janitors and moderators shouldn't focus in just the asshat...Except they don't, threads get deleted all the time for off topic and nsfw. Except you don't see them if they're deleted and you weren't following them, where as all day you see that stupid avatar and idiot roasted bread shitposting.Why do you post with an avatar? No one likes it but you, it obviously aggravates most people and yet you continue, the only possible explanation would be you enjoy the negative attention and don't care about the quality of the board, or in other words SHIT. POSTING.See the image I posted? I have enough Onizuka to avatar, but don't because I'm not a twat.
>>122141Okay. Here are just the key points of this argument, which you keep sampling selectively and twisting in odd ways.>Avatarfag is a problem that needs to be dealt withWe seem to agree on this one>Off topic and NSFW is a problem that needs to be dealt withWe seem to agree on this>Off topic/ Tangenitally related shitWe strongly disagree on what should be allowed. If /v/ could theoretically have a thread about couch positions, I think we should be able to have a sonic fanart thread. >/co/ is not /v/Its not. But that image is a guideline of how thread topics should related to the theme of the board. Its ideas should apply to all the interest boards- its posted on /v/ because they have more traffic. >Is the asshat avatarfag a larger problem than offtopic?I say yes. You say no. This is a matter of opinion- both are breaking rules. Both are corrupting the quality of boards. >Is asshat avatarfag a constructive use of the janitor/mods time?You (seem) to think no. I obviously think it is.>Is ignoring/filtering an option?Its a bandaid, or to use your words "covering them with your thumb." You can't NOT be bothered by offtopic or NSFW stuff in the same manner that some of us can't NOT be bothered by this stupid fucking asshole. Ignoring/Filtering isn't a solution- its a temporary and seriously flawed bandaid for a large wound.But its hard to take you completely serious, I can't tell if all your point are sarcastic or not, as you're also being a sorta mean avatarfag
>>122158That's a lot of meanings for "Shitposting"Want to tell me that criticising your favorite show is shitposting?>pretending one problem can just be ignored while another problem(which is not at all a problem in most cases) needs to be addressed immediately, is shitposting.How do you define what it's a real problem and what no?Because you don't find one more bothersome than the other one? Because you like one more than the other one? Because one is less ugly than the other one?I think Off-topic and NSFW shit is a real problem because it encourages more and more Off-topic and NSFW thread that will soon lead to what we know as /v/.>>122177>>122178That's a lot of shit to answer, I will leave it there for a while.
>>122141ALSOIn regards to the conflict we seem to have between prioritizing avatarfag v offtopic/nsfw stuff, in my experience /co/ has been pretty good about self-cleaning offtopic stuff.Before /mlp/ was created, /co/ had managed to herd them into one thread on the board at a time. HSG stays to one thread on the board at a time. Seriously offtopic threads are deleted all the time. Your personal interpretation of offtopic stuff is certainly stauncher than mine, but its not YOUR place or HIS place or MY place to decide what level is acceptable. Thats up to the janitors/mods, and the /co/ community as a whole. The reason I'm here is to argue about an issue that cannot be solved without mod intervention.
>>122177Damn nigga>the vast majority sees avatar fagging and shit posting as a worse problem than slightly off-topic threads.More like a noisy group with zero self control.>It's incredible how you managed to miss his point and at the same time basically confirm "Yes I am going to be a bigger problem if you don't deal with me"How can it get bigger? Posting two reaction pics? Oh boy>It would be like saying "/v/ can discuss comics based on video games, BUT IF THEY SAY ONE WORD ABOUT SOMETHING NOT FROM THE GAME I'M REPORTING FOR OFF-TOPIC SHITPOSTING!". I didn't say one word, I said that if the thread becomes focus only in that topic, it becomes off-topic.>hey talk games we talk comics AND cartoons, see?They are completly different.>Except they don't, threads get deleted all the time for off topic and nsfw. Except you don't see them if they're deleted and you weren't following themHaha, this is when you are even more sillyI've followed off-topic and NSFW threads for a good time just to see that they got 404 by image or post limit.>Before /mlp/ was created, /co/ had managed to herd them into one thread on the board at a time. HSG stays to one thread on the board at a time.No.Before /mlp/, /co/ were just throwing shit to each other until the thread was over or a janitor delete it, the mods had to step in and say that MLP shit could be only in the MLP general until /mlp/ was created.>Seriously offtopic threads are deleted all the time. No, they aren'tAre you serious?>Thats up to the janitors/mods, and the /co/ community as a whole. Yeah, too bad the janitors and mods are shit and the community can barely hate the same thing together, we sure are in for a good trip.
>>122282>More like a noisy group with zero self control.Way to live in candy land, lets do an experiment. Go into an off topic thread, lets say a nsfw dump, tell me how many people post and complain about it. Then go to a thread full of avatars/RB and tell me how many people complain. Argue "vocal minority" all you want, unless you have evidence otherwise you're just dodging.>How can it get bigger? Posting two reaction pics? Oh boyYou're either stupid or avoiding the obvious on purpose, it gets bigger by more people doing it until entire threads are just avatar circle jerks.>I didn't say one word, I said that if the thread becomes focus only in that topic, it becomes off-topic.Thread topics rotate, you can't expect them to stay exactly on the precise subject of connection. If they're talking about MvC for example on /co/ you can't fucking fault them if the discussion happens to involve some talking about strategy or other characters.>AND cartoons, see?They are completly different.I'm not sure if this is supposed to be funny or if you think it's an actual argument.Saving the rest for a second post, because this is getting too goddamn huge for one.
>>122282>No, they aren'tYeah they are. This is just going to devolve into he-said, she-said. I personally see threads that are off topic get deleted frequently. I have ALSO followed some of these threads to see if they get 404d. The ones that don't usually aren't popular and end up at page 10 really quickly. But I think it is also clear that our standards of "off topic" are quite different. I'm just going to reiterate this post:>>122178You and I have different opinions on some of this stuff. We agree that there are problems, but I think (at least considering /co/ at the moment) the avatarfag is far more pressing. >the community can barely hate the same thing togetherThis is a good thing. It keeps diversity of opinions in threads strong. It wouldn't be interesting if everyone hated DC or everyone hated LoK. Whatever the difference in our opinions, I think its hard for me or anyone else to take all your arguments against the avatarfag or other rulebreaking seriously. Because you're an avatarfag, which means your respect for the rules and proper content of the boards is not as pristine as you like to present. If you REALLY want to contribute to the health of /co/, this is not the right way. Instead of yelling at people in a discussion for veering off topic, post back on topic and even samefag a couple times if you need too- others will follow the flow. Report NSFW, but do not bump the threads with /a/ images. Having a thread 404 works way better as a warning.
>>122300>Haha, this is when you are even more sillyI've followed off-topic and NSFW threads for a good time just to see that they got 404 by image or post limit.You know why? Because a NSFW dump doesn't require discussion, it's a bunch of people dumping images, of course it's going to fill up incredibly fast before it can be deleted. Mods only deal with threads if they run into them or are reported, guess people aren't reporting them that much, gee maybe again the majority finds you barging into a good discussion much worse than a spoiled image dump?Also you switched posts halfway through without a quote, might want to fix that. Unless you think everyone against you is one giant entity or something stupid like that.
I'm not sure what Roasted's like on other boards but he's definitely one of the highest quality posters on /mu/ right now. Please don't take him away from us.
>>122316HAH. That's a real lark pal. I'm pretty sure the vast majority of /mu/ would not give a single flying shit if he got banned, or murdered. Either way he would stop posting.
>>122316I'm really having a hard time believing that, especially if his ID changes the next time he posts.
>>122323He's very well liked by the majority of mature posters on our board, it's just those fucking anonymous /mu/tants that bitch whenever the spotlight isn't on them that hate him.
>>122351So...he's liked by trips but hated by anons? And you think that makes it majority? Really?
