>Also >inb4 pedophile
at least you know you are
get help

>>100905
But 3D lolis are disgusting therefore im not a pedo. I just like pure 2D lolis.

>>100901
Go to /c/

>>100918
sfw lolis are part of /a/ culture banning them is like letting narutards post on /a/... oh wait!

>>100905
bui pls go

literally nobody gives a fuck

>Lolicon is technically against the global rules
>Gets made when an anon makes an uncouth remark gets banned
I'm so tired of all the /a/ threads on /q/.

l thought america was supposed to be a free country.
Liking loli isn't illegal.

4chan...4chan has changed...

http://archive.foolz.us/q/thread/66695/#68880

>>101043
>/q/ - 4chan discussion
>mods and moot break /a/
>everyone else mad that /q/ is now being used to vent /a/'s rage
Guess why this all started?

The guy's post

> Some people are legit pedophiles unfortunately.
> unfortunately
"What's unfortunate about recognizing ultimate beauty and grace?"


It's obvious that the mod banned him not because of the pic, but because of the post.

>>101087

>It's obvious that the mod banned him not because of the pic, but because of the post.

Is that supposed to make the ban less bullshit?

>>101094
Yes? As the guy was obviously supporting pedophilia?
I'm not talking about 2D lolis or whatever, he clearly said that there's no problem in being a real pedophile.

>>100905
If you're not comfortable sharing this site with pedophiles then I suggest you leave.

>>101102
Bui, back to /g/ with you.

>>101123
yes, everyone is bui

>>100901
How do you get banned over a pic like that? Doesn't matter if you're a pedo or not, posting a sfw character of some anime character shouldn't get you permabanned.

MOOT

Here's the conversation:

>Why would you want her to when Guts has that delicious witch loli.

>loli
>delicious
>You must be new to anime and only listen to /a/'s memes.

>Some people are legit pedophiles unfortunately. I wish I had your optimism where it's all just some big joke.

>What's unfortunate about recognizing ultimate beauty and grace?

The discussion was about a fictional character in a manga, and the guy bringing up pedophiles was trying to derail the thread with an offtopic, inflammatory comment. The wrong poster got banned.

Of course, normalfags stop thinking and attack everything that moves as soon as they hear the word "pedophile." Banning the reply without banning the provocateur only opens the door to trolling.

>>101043
No, lolicon is fine. This has been said time and time again. Like with everything else, it's not against the rules unless it's NSFW.

Despite what the normalfags in this thread would believe, 4chan is not a website where political correctness should apply.

Lolicon is not against the law. It's not against the rules. It's topical for /a/. If you don't like lolicon yourself, like me, then you can just hide the fucking thread. But if it's work-safe, board-topical and not against the rules or the law, then it should be allowed.

Moderators should not be allowed to impose their particular flavour of morality on to the rest of us.

he implicitly implied that it is NOT unfortunate that there are LEGIT pedophiles out there, as in people that collect and masturbate to images of children taking part in sexual acts.

he didn't get banned for liking lolis he got banned for promoting actual factual pedophilia

File: 1345099708760.png-(155 KB, 252x345, iori.png)

We already have a thread on this, stop trying to make it into some EPIC LOL SHITSTORM or something. You're just responding to a bunch of people who are trolling you. At this rate we'll loose the first thread and never have the moderator's actions addressed.

>>101883
>there are LEGIT pedophiles out there, as in people that collect and masturbate to images of children taking part in sexual acts.
No.

Pedophile != Child pornography collector.
Pedophilia is a mental illness. It is not always correlated to breaking the law.
And, in any case, the person who was linked to posting in the OP could easily have been joking, or was only talking about 2D drawings.

>>101883
I find pedophilia to be disgusting but no where in the rules does it say that the discussion or even encouragement of it is bannable. He should be able to say whatever the hell he wants until he breaks the rules

Also, OP, why? There is already a thread on the front page about this exact ban. Why are you shitting up /q/?

>>101043
But it wasn't lolicon he was posting. He was just posting Ilya from Fate/Zero with no sexual context and made a tongue in cheek comment, like the thousands on 4chan every day. How does that merit a ban at all, let alone a permanent one?

>>101094

What, it's bullshit that somebody was banned for endorsing pedophilia? Good riddance.

>>101951
>What, it's bullshit that somebody was banned for endorsing pedophilia?
It's bullshit someone was banned permanently for making a joke post about pedophilia. /a/ gets hundreds of posts like that a day. /v/ gets hundreds. Every board gets hundreds.

Holy fuck, it's his fucking website. If you would have quit bitching and taken it up with him and he would have probably unbanned you. (But now that you are being extremely bitchy, probably not)

Quit being freaking entitled. 4chan has some of the most lax moderation of content on the entire web.

>>101951
Until such things are against the rules, yes it is bullshit. I don't come to 4chan because it's a nice happy place where everyone agrees and shares my opinion.

You should be more concerned about the mods abusing their power. Next time it's going to be you getting banned for saying something they don't like, and you'll wish you had paid attention.

"First they came for the communists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me."

>>102020

No, don't... really.

>>101893
>Pedophilia is a mental illness
People said the same thing about the gays

Saying someone is mentally ill because they like different things from you is just stupid. Remember that this isn't a post in support of pedophilia, just that I think it's stupid that lots of things get called a mental illness when it really isn't.

>>101951
Bans aren't supposed to be made because a mod found your taste unpreferable. Bans should only be made when a rule is broken.

>>102047
And yet, rule 17 clearly gives leeway.

>>101998
>it's his fucking website
He wasn't banned by Moot, just some shitty mod. A mod has no more claim to a site then the normal users do.

>>102057
Moot lifted the ban just now, see the other thread. Love you mootles.

moot ## Admin
08/16/12(Thu)03:38
No.102067

moot ## Admin 08/16/12(Thu)03:38 No.102067

See >>102060