Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)11:50 No.13773928

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)11:50 No.13773928

Replies: >>13774111 >>13775172 >>13775572

Any such candidate would be primaried by the Koch brothers.

Sanity and rational positions hold no sway in the GOP, it's a party by and for crazies.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)11:50 No.13773932

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)11:50 No.13773932

>black male

I have green eyes am I black /pol/?

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)11:51 No.13773981

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)11:51 No.13773981

>>13773868 (OP)
Walter E. Williams or Thomas Sowell

Both come to mind, however they do not match exactly the description.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)11:55 No.13774111

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)11:55 No.13774111

Replies: >>13774179

>>13773928

It's a shame that Koch will only field a guy that is programmed to suck banker cock.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)11:57 No.13774179

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)11:57 No.13774179

Replies: >>13774432

>>13774111

1st amendment applies to the Kochs too, they're free to use their considerable resources to advocate their positions in the primaries in any way they can.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:05 No.13774432

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:05 No.13774432

Replies: >>13774518 >>13774580 >>13774812

>>13774179

Koch isn't using the 1st Amendment.

Koch is using obscene amounts of money to monopolize American politics.

There's a difference between a guy standing on a soapbox and discussing his views and a guy who was groomed, trained, and paid for by an international cartel of bankers and executives to marginalize every other person out there and tip the scales in favor of the elites.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:07 No.13774518

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:07 No.13774518

Replies: >>13774613

>>13774432
>Koch is using obscene amounts of money to monopolize American politics.
They don't spend nearly as much as the Unions do.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774580

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774580

Replies: >>13774756

>>13774432
>Top 20 political donors
>14 Democrat
>5 Neutral
>1 Republican
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php

Muh Kochs, Muh NRA

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774581

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774581

I'd rather make it rain with Herman "Sugar" Cain

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774584

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774584

Replies: >>13774657

>>13773868 (OP)
>THE PERFECT GOP CANDIDATE IS...
>...pro-choice in a Susan B. Anthony sort of way.

Hahahaha, no. What are you, an idiot?

>...pro-gay in a "Let's focus on bigger issues" sort of way.

Nope.
He needs to defer to states rights, always. Never say a single pro-gay word.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774613

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:09 No.13774613

Replies: >>13774696

>>13774518

But we're not talking about unions.

Way to move the goalpost, kiddo.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:11 No.13774657

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:11 No.13774657

Replies: >>13774696

>>13774584

>Never say a single pro-gay word.

Because that worked out so well for Mittens, eh?

Face the facts: the GOP has to evolve or die.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:11 No.13774659

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:11 No.13774659

>>13773868 (OP)
>...a fatherly, married black male in his 50s.

>America
>not being a cuckold nation

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:12 No.13774694

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:12 No.13774694

Replies: >>13774737

>>13773868 (OP)
>...a fatherly, married black male in his 50s.

No.

Republicans will never win over blacks. Hispanics is the way forward.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:12 No.13774696

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:12 No.13774696

Replies: >>13774796 >>13774883

>>13774613
You were talking about monopolization of politics by the Koch brothers.

What they spend pales in comparison to what Dems receive in contributions.

What you said is emphatically false, kiddo, and more a product of MSNBC/Huffington Post editorials rather than anything resembling reality.

>>13774657
>Because that worked out so well for Mittens, eh?
Mitt Romney lost because America has become a country of non-white benefit scroungers. Republicans will likely never take the White House as long as this is the case.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:13 No.13774737

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:13 No.13774737

Replies: >>13775361

>>13774694
>Hispanics is the way forward.
>Around 75% of Hispanics voted for Obama despite him deporting a record number of illegals
>California is blue despite Reagan bringing in millions of illegals
Make no mistake - Hispanics will never swing red. They are benefits-scroungers and will always remain as such.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:14 No.13774756

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:14 No.13774756

Replies: >>13774823

>>13774580

If you think this is a party-oriented issue, then you should probably go back to finishing your coloring book and watching cartoons.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:15 No.13774779

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:15 No.13774779

Replies: >>13774819

File: 1367770503657.gif-(1.59 MB, 426x319, 1366306189102.gif)

1.59 MB GIF

>>13773868 (OP)
>cain
>incompetent

>implying anyone but 3 lying whores could have ever stopped the cain train

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:15 No.13774796

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:15 No.13774796

Replies: >>13774823

>>13774696

>backpedaling
>y-you p-p-probably watch librul n-news

Your butthurt is showing.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:16 No.13774812

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:16 No.13774812

>>13774432
>koch is using obscene amounts of free speech to monopolize american politics

k

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:16 No.13774819

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:16 No.13774819

Replies: >>13774865

>>13774779

If that dude got felled by three women, then a fucking summer breeze would've pushed his ass over.

Can you say, "Incompetent?"

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:16 No.13774823

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:16 No.13774823

Replies: >>13775023

>>13774756
>If you think this is a party-oriented issue
Campaign contribution figures seem to imply that it is.

>>13774796
>Tossing out unoriginal 4chan insults rather than addressing the points I made
I will interpret this as concession of defeat.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:17 No.13774861

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:17 No.13774861

>>13773868 (OP)
>voting gop or democrats
>XXI century

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:17 No.13774865

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:17 No.13774865

>>13774819
And exactly how would you have countered a false accusation?

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:18 No.13774883

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:18 No.13774883

Replies: >>13774931 >>13775097 >>13775305

>>13774696

>Mitt Romney lost because America has become a country of non-white benefit scroungers.

Lulz. America has a white majority.

You're living in a fantasy world.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:19 No.13774918

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:19 No.13774918

>pro choice

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:19 No.13774931

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:19 No.13774931

Replies: >>13775079

>>13774883
>Lulz. America has a white majority.
Romney won the white vote but still lost the election. This is the first time in history this has happened. America's white majority is broken.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:23 No.13775023

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:23 No.13775023

Replies: >>13775124

>>13774823

>I WIN, U LOSE

Lulz.

If you're that obsessed with "winning" an online argument, then you definitely have no chance of ever getting laid.

Better luck next time, sweetie.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:24 No.13775079

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:24 No.13775079

Replies: >>13775247

>>13774931

>blame the blacks!

Man, you guys sound like a broken record.

Your candidate lost because he sucked. Get over it.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:25 No.13775097

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:25 No.13775097

Replies: >>13775145 >>13775211

>>13774883
>>13774883
Haha, what? Whites are a plurality. America is majority nonwhite. Whites are just the single biggest group. Add all the nonwhites together and they outnumber whites.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:25 No.13775124

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:25 No.13775124

Replies: >>13775244

>>13775023
>If you're that obsessed with "winning" an online argument, then you definitely have no chance of ever getting laid.

Yeah, I'm not even the person you were arguing against but you jumped on the ad hominem train pretty quick. It's obvious you've lost your ground and are stumbling for something to say. Thus the "you ain't gonna get laid!1!!1!11 lel!!!" comment.

Go back to reddit.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:25 No.13775125

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:25 No.13775125

>>13773868 (OP)

You're crossing over into libertarianism.

America would call this man a RINO.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:26 No.13775145

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:26 No.13775145

Replies: >>13775293

>>13775097
>America is majority nonwhite

Are you retarded?

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:28 No.13775172

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:28 No.13775172

>>13773868 (OP)

Sounds pretty good OP, we could've just voted Buchanan in '96 though.

>>13773928

Did Koch even give to anyone in the primary?

>Sanity and rational positions hold no sway in the GOP,

Dems are still worse in this regard.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:29 No.13775211

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:29 No.13775211

>>13775097

You reaaly have no idea what you're talking about, whites are 60-70% aka a majority.

The only place that is true is NM I think.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:30 No.13775244

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:30 No.13775244

Replies: >>13775357

>>13775124
>Yeah, I'm not even the person you were arguing against

Whoa, here come the cheerleaders.

The only thing more pathetic than a kid with talking points that don't make any sense is a kid who is willing to come in out of nowhere and fellatiate that same idiot while yelling "Reddit!"

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:30 No.13775247

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:30 No.13775247

Replies: >>13775357

File: 1367771408567.jpg-(60 KB, 600x600, 1366750995650.jpg)

60 KB JPG

>>13775079

whites are starting to sound like redguards of the past.

"whenever i fail, it is cause of deh niggers!"

fucking take responsibility already

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:31 No.13775286

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:31 No.13775286

Replies: >>13775314 >>13775385

File: 1367771476901.jpg-(16 KB, 624x352, oh_yes.jpg)

16 KB JPG

>>13773868 (OP)
That's everything wrong with a candidate.

If the GOP wants to win, they have to go after new markets, while recognizing that they're base will vote for whatever has the R next to their name, since the poor who vote republican aren't voting in their own interests anyway, its obvious that they've just grown up checking boxes with 'R's' next to their names.

No, a real perfect GOP candidate
>motherly, married transsexual native american in his early 40's
>pro legalization of recreational drug use
>pro-corporation
>pro-anti-isolationism - Will be willing to get his hands dirty in all sorts of humanitarian missions, that amount to little more than occupations of war torn areas
>pro-abortion, eg. mandatory abortions
>pro-gay-marriage
>states rights
>not afraid to abuse the shit out of the victim card
>pro-guns - e'erybody gets one and a banjo for free

This way you get the tumblr generation and the grand ole party generation all at once.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:31 No.13775293

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:31 No.13775293

Replies: >>13775347

File: 1367771493959.png-(25 KB, 898x496, americawhite.png)

25 KB PNG

>>13775145
Well, it will be by 2050.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:31 No.13775305

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:31 No.13775305

Replies: >>13775357

>>13774883

>Mitt Romney lost because America has >become a country of non-white benefit >scroungers.

Romney lost because he had no way to connect with the disenfranchised, & dissatisfied.
(Which is the real majority)

The Democrats rule the politics of separation by race, class, or another other number of divisions.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:32 No.13775314

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:32 No.13775314

>>13775286

TOP LEL

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775347

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775347

Replies: >>13775388

>>13775293

>believing hypothetical projections

Man, no wonder you guys were disappointed on election day.

I guess stupid is as stupid does, because you just don't learn.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775357

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775357

Replies: >>13775515

>>13775247
>fucking take responsibility already
And how does one "take responsibility" in the face of growing minority voting blocs who will vote Democrat no matter what?

>>13775244
All you have done in this thread is make ad hominem after ad hominem and fail to address anything that has been said. You're either a troll or a retard.

>>13775305
>Romney lost because he had no way to connect with the disenfranchised, & dissatisfied.
According to MSNBC, perhaps.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775361

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775361

>>13774737
This. Hispanics secretly want USA to fail so mexico can recede parts they lost. They would never vote for a pro america party

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775363

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:33 No.13775363

Replies: >>13775419

>>13775337
They actually just vote for whoever is the most catholic.

They're a simple people really.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:34 No.13775385

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:34 No.13775385

Replies: >>13775439

>>13775286

Republicans are least likely compared to Dems to just vote the party ticket, quite a few either stay home or third party whereas Dems just vote for the guy who'll gibe monies.

This is seen with Romney where poorer white voters didn't go to the polls.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:34 No.13775388

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:34 No.13775388

>>13775347
What? Those are actual statistics. The only way for whites to remain a majority by 2050 is if immigration severely slows down

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:35 No.13775419

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:35 No.13775419

Replies: >>13775448

>>13775363
>They actually just vote for whoever is the most catholic.
[citation needed]

I guess that's why they vote for the pro-abortion party.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:35 No.13775437

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:35 No.13775437

>...religious, but mindful of other faiths, and pro-science.

Only in America would this have to be a condition when considering the acceptance of a candidate.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:36 No.13775439

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:36 No.13775439

>>13775385
>This is seen with Romney where poorer white voters didn't go to the polls.

That's because Romney ripped on medicinal herb.

White trash love their dro.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:36 No.13775448

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:36 No.13775448

>>13775419
democrats do a huge amount of pandering to the "social justice" catholics

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:38 No.13775515

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:38 No.13775515

>>13775357
>All you have done in this thread

Hey, thanks for that analysis, professor.

You sound a bit mad, though. Tell me when you have office hours, and I'll drop by with a tube of Preparation H.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:38 No.13775518

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:38 No.13775518

>>13773868 (OP)

>black male

No. White male president, black male VP.

Anonymous
05/05/13(Sun)12:39 No.13775572

Anonymous 05/05/13(Sun)12:39 No.13775572

>>13773928

>GOP is party for crazies
Seriously, those lunatics abolished slavery! Crazy bastards!