Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:28 No.14085470

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:28 No.14085470

Replies: >>14085920

File: 1368354520019.png-(41 KB, 510x656, muh guns.png)

41 KB PNG

shameless self bump

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:33 No.14085586

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:33 No.14085586

Replies: >>14086444

File: 1368354788152.png-(287 KB, 630x408, k demands action.png)

287 KB PNG

>>14085363 (OP)
fix'd the pic for ya bro

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:35 No.14085636

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:35 No.14085636

>>14085363 (OP)
The 2nd amendment isn't for deer hunting, it's for tyrants'

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:41 No.14085785

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:41 No.14085785

Replies: >>14085978 >>14087113

File: 1368355307992.jpg-(135 KB, 800x552, US homicide rate and hist(...).jpg)

135 KB JPG

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/05/07/gun-homicide-rate-down-49-since-1993-peak-public-unaware/

first bit of required reading for any gun red pill thread

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:43 No.14085830

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:43 No.14085830

Replies: >>14086248

File: 1368355419827.jpg-(158 KB, 933x666, FBI murder stats.jpg)

158 KB JPG

Notice that this includes ALL rifles, not just the black ones with scary features

more people are killed with hammers than rifles every year

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:45 No.14085870

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:45 No.14085870

Replies: >>14086050 >>14087332

File: 1368355545906.jpg-(1009 KB, 1960x1500, Top killers of Americans.jpg)

1009 KB JPG

You'd think democrats would be more focused on banning cigarettes than guns, which contribute to about 400-600,000 of these deaths compared to the measly amount killed by guns

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:46 No.14085888

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:46 No.14085888

gunfacts.info

All you need.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:47 No.14085920

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:47 No.14085920

Replies: >>14086008 >>14086068 >>14088308

>>14085470
>low gun violence

Does anyone else find it suspicious that they always have to specify it's with guns? Kind of implies maybe the figures on overall violence aren't so rosy.

Anonymous
Democrats still do want gun co(...) 05/12/13(Sun)06:49 No.14085960

Democrats still do want gun confiscation after nearly 20 years of Feinstein admitting it Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:49 No.14085960

File: 1368355775645.jpg-(712 KB, 1457x2078, 1362707899323.jpg)

712 KB JPG

“We needed a bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate.”
“They [gun owners] want to keep the guns out of the hands of the bad guys, but they don’t have any regulations to do it.”
“They don’t care about the bad guys. All they want to do is have their little guns and do whatever they want with them.”
“That’s the line they’ve developed.”

>The discussion appears to be among Senator Loretta Weinberg (D37), Senator Sandra Cunningham (D31), Senator Linda Greenstein(D14), and at least one member of Senate Democratic staff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=algPRgetQ5E

and for the official record of the audio recording

http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/media/archive_audio2.asp?KEY=SBA&SESSION=2012
>find Thursday, May 9 from the menu, then click “listen” beginning at 1:52:30

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:50 No.14085978

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:50 No.14085978

Replies: >>14086068 >>14087630 >>14088393

>>14085785
Is this graph seriously legit? Proves a lot of things really, both to do with drugs and guns (my two favorite things in the world btw, probs not at the same time though, that does seem a tad irresponsible). Also what does it mean by "union-led gun control" why in the fuck would unions care about guns?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:51 No.14086008

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:51 No.14086008

Replies: >>14086056 >>14086065

>>14085920
>Does anyone else find it suspicious that they always have to specify it's with guns? Kind of implies maybe the figures on overall violence aren't so rosy.

I only find things suspicious when I don't realize the purpose.

Obviously it's because overall violent crime rises with monopoly of gun ownership.

Yes gun crime drops with gun control, but overall violent crime rises.

Violent crime as a whole has been falling for decades, however gun control laws cause corrections to the trend.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:53 No.14086050

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:53 No.14086050

Replies: >>14086070 >>14086078 >>14088010

>>14085870
Think of the shitstorm that would ensue if they banned cigarettes.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:53 No.14086056

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:53 No.14086056

>>14086008
>I only find things suspicious when I don't realize the purpose.

I was speaking rhetorically.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:54 No.14086065

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:54 No.14086065

Replies: >>14086100 >>14086158 >>14087730

File: 1368356070450.png-(74 KB, 540x371, 1368219379031.png)

74 KB PNG

>>14086008

with both the Australian and UK bans we can see a rise in violence immediately after the ban, then the rate goes right back to normal completely negating any point in the confiscations and bans on guns in the first place

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkS2BRoCd2I

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:54 No.14086068

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:54 No.14086068

>>14085978
yes it's legit.

>>14085920
they say gun violence, because, yes, gun deaths (yuk yuk we'll include suicides and justifiable homicide in our stats) do decrease when guns are banned. However, violent crime stays the same or increases.

Imagine, a tool that equalizes exchanges of force makes it harder for professional thugs to steal and kill innocents.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:54 No.14086070

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:54 No.14086070

Replies: >>14086123

>>14086050
It would be quite literally the funniest thing ever.

>"Fucking drug addicts, they're all scum." *puffs cigarette*
>Cigarettes banned
>"WHERE ARE MY FUCKING CIGARETTES CUNT I'LL FUCKING KNIFE YA!"

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:55 No.14086078

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:55 No.14086078

>>14086050

more like think of the lobby and campaign money that would be lost, which is why they don't push for it

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:56 No.14086100

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:56 No.14086100

Replies: >>14086192 >>14086242

>>14086065
Why does it rise and then fall like that though?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:57 No.14086123

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:57 No.14086123

Replies: >>14086176 >>14086203

>>14086070
Oi mate, you sellin ciggies?
ye mate keep it down, people around.
k mate
200 dollars per pack

And so on

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:58 No.14086158

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:58 No.14086158

Replies: >>14086242 >>14086248 >>14086563

>>14086065
>with both the Australian and UK bans we can see a rise in violence immediately after the ban

That's because the Labour Party in the UK decided to alter the way that stats on violent crime were compiled.

==Definition in USA of violent crime==
In the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, violent crime is composed of four offences: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.

==UK Definition of violent crime==
Recorded crime includes violence against the person (ranging from the more serious offences of homicide, serious wounding and threats to kill, to the less serious offences of common assault and harassment), sexual offences (not all of which are violent e.g. bigamy) and robbery (including robbery where no-one was harmed and no threats were made).

The rates in the UK are far higher because they include common assault and harassment which are by far the largest "violent" crimes in the UK but do not actually result in any injury to the victim. In the USA, such crimes would be treated as non-violent misdemeanours and excised from the statistics.

==Homicide by any means 2011==
USA: 14,159
UK: 724

UK homicides by knife 2011. 200
USA homicides by knife 2010 1,704
So, adjusting for population, the USA has 1.7 knife murders for every 1 in the UK.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:58 No.14086161

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:58 No.14086161

File: 1368356317066.jpg-(1.45 MB, 1029x4529, 1366751586589.jpg)

1.45 MB JPG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X9JkSudCX4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVyV9ojTA_I

still don't think the government won't try to take your weapons? think they wouldn't beat the shit out of your frail grandmother to do it?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:59 No.14086174

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:59 No.14086174

File: 1368356367740.jpg-(37 KB, 805x360, 1366227262917.jpg)

37 KB JPG

my favorite picture on the whole issue

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)06:59 No.14086176

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)06:59 No.14086176

Replies: >>14086187 >>14086281

>>14086123
They've already shown themselvs to be willing to pay for the nose for them, they're up to about $20 a packet here in Ausfalia and they still keep on smoking, I know shitloads of people who still smoke (I hang out with a lot of derros).

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:00 No.14086187

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:00 No.14086187

>>14086176
*through the nose

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:00 No.14086192

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:00 No.14086192

Replies: >>14086214

File: 1368356432491.png-(453 KB, 2000x2782, 1366080041459.png)

453 KB PNG

>>14086100

because after a ban the citizens are not armed so the criminals can be more bold, not a fact but that would be my guess

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:01 No.14086203

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:01 No.14086203

Replies: >>14086228

>>14086123

I thought brits called them fags

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:01 No.14086214

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:01 No.14086214

Replies: >>14086588

>>14086192
But then why does it go down again later to the former levels? Shouldn't it just stay up if that's the case?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:02 No.14086228

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:02 No.14086228

>>14086203
Fucking aussies ya shitcunt (at least I am).

btw you're a fag

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:02 No.14086234

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:02 No.14086234

Replies: >>14086252

>Moms ban a book because it contains references to alcohol
>uses it in a propaganda poster to argue that other things should be banned

Kill every white woman between 35 and 65.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:02 No.14086235

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:02 No.14086235

File: 1368356571313.jpg-(816 KB, 1800x2743, image.jpg)

816 KB JPG

You should go to /k/

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:03 No.14086242

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:03 No.14086242

Replies: >>14086707

>>14086100
Because:
>>14086158

The only violent crime stats that cannot be juked are those for homicide.

Compare the homicide rate by nation if you want an actual depoliticized view of crime.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:03 No.14086248

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:03 No.14086248

Replies: >>14086325

>>14086158

you're about 2,000 off, according to the FBI >>14085830

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:03 No.14086252

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:03 No.14086252

Replies: >>14086264

>>14086234
That is pretty diabolical.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:04 No.14086264

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:04 No.14086264

>>14086252

Soccer moms, they are the true bastion of Left-Authoritarianism on this planet.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:05 No.14086281

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:05 No.14086281

Replies: >>14086362

>>14086176
Don't even need to tell me... I live in Australia. I fucking hate it. Taxing me bullshit for more money.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:07 No.14086325

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:07 No.14086325

>>14086248
No. My total homicide figures include negligent manslaughter. If you remove those, the figures go down to about 12,000 for 2011.

I don't feel strongly about negligent manslaughter. You can remove them from the numbers if you like.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:07 No.14086336

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:07 No.14086336

File: 1368356874255.jpg-(153 KB, 710x389, image.jpg)

153 KB JPG

Reminder that those who say they are against guns are lying

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:08 No.14086356

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:08 No.14086356

File: 1368356938674.png-(196 KB, 300x450, 1363092977340.png)

196 KB PNG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lu4lVFijM6g

This video demonstrates why you can't rely on 911 and the police to defend you

>When seconds count the police are minutes away

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZKVSNjlSp0

this man fought off a murderer while the police just watched, then Michael Bloomberg and the police took credit for the capture

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:09 No.14086362

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:09 No.14086362

Replies: >>14086373 >>14086409

>>14086281
Maybe you should try giving up (lol).

But seriously I know mulitple people who used to do hard drugs, quite them, but still smoke like chimneys even though they know it's so bad for them. I'll never forget a documentary I saw about a rehab place and everyone there fucking smoked, and no-one ever mentioned it, like that wasn't a serious danger to them like the codeine or ecstasy or weed or gambling or booze or whatever they were there for.

Realistically if what you're worried about is addiction then you'd be safer honking on a crack pipe then smoking a cigarette. I mean yeah crack makes you feel great but then you feel like shit afterwards, with cigarettes there's not that problem, they just make you feel a little good. That's actually way worse.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:09 No.14086373

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:09 No.14086373

>>14086362
*quite alot

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:10 No.14086384

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:10 No.14086384

>only white kids holding guns

Aww iddy bitty minority who only wants a kinder surprise

FUCKING FILTHY DEGENERATE WHITE SCUM WHO ONLY KNOWS HOW TO KILL. THEY ARE JUST LIKE THEIR ANCESTORS.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:11 No.14086409

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:11 No.14086409

Replies: >>14086450

>>14086362
True, ciggies are pretty bad. But they just make me feel good after getting off a bullshit day of 11 hours of being fucking screamed at, my boss is the biggest cunt ever.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:12 No.14086417

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:12 No.14086417

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyYYgLzF6zU

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:12 No.14086430

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:12 No.14086430

Replies: >>14087388

File: 1368357160092.jpg-(118 KB, 602x640, image.jpg)

118 KB JPG

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ospNRk2uM3U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRQqieimwLQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EUObv1K_Pg
These are the people who pass gun legislation and know nothing of firearms.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:13 No.14086440

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:13 No.14086440

Replies: >>14086492 >>14086600

File: 1368357211112.jpg-(356 KB, 1090x1230, Guns are the best form of(...).jpg)

356 KB JPG

Using close range fighting tactics to defend yourself is more likely to get you hurt, especially in the case of women who are more likely to be oversized and outmuscled in a close range fight

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:13 No.14086444

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:13 No.14086444

Replies: >>14086525 >>14087144

>>14085586
>>14085363 (OP)
Why is it always the white child holding the guns?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:13 No.14086450

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:13 No.14086450

>>14086409
Maybe try those e-cigs, or some less harmful alternative way of getting nicotine. Your life quite literally depends on finding one, and they'll probably be cheaper.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:15 No.14086492

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:15 No.14086492

Replies: >>14086527 >>14086576 >>14087779

>>14086440
>use a knife to defend yourself
>use a knife ever

jesus christ what dumb cunt. knives are the most brutal and savage of tools, there's a reason we distanced ourselves from using it in war. NO ONE wins a knife fight, one side just loses slower

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:16 No.14086512

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:16 No.14086512

Replies: >>14086536

File: 1368357411587.jpg-(59 KB, 613x550, image.jpg)

59 KB JPG

Reminder there is no correlation between gun ownership and homicide rate.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:17 No.14086525

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:17 No.14086525

>>14086444
Because whitey instinctively finds little white girls with guns/drugs/bruises more horrifying than children of other races.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:17 No.14086527

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:17 No.14086527

Replies: >>14087717

>>14086492
Only way to use a knife effectively is from behind against a guy who doesn't even know you're there. Sentry removal, that's it, everything else is way too fucking risky.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:18 No.14086536

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:18 No.14086536

Replies: >>14086618

>>14086512
Actually, I'm sure there is.

What you mean to say is that extant variables like niggers must be controlled for before you start measuring the correlation.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:19 No.14086563

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:19 No.14086563

Replies: >>14086773

File: 1368357556735.png-(76 KB, 540x366, gun_control_england.png)

76 KB PNG

>>14086158
>GUN CONTROL WORKS I SWEAR

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:19 No.14086576

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:19 No.14086576

File: 1368357593013.jpg-(157 KB, 853x953, image.jpg)

157 KB JPG

>>14086492
I love her thought process of people are rarely killed cleaning their knife as if accidental firearms deaths happen so frequent when statistically they are one of the lowest things you should be concerned about.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:20 No.14086588

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:20 No.14086588

>>14086214
Probably because the criminals who decide to take advantage of the disarming end up being caught over that time period and put in jail.

But because the crime rate merely falls back down to the level prior to the ban what this actually means is that banning guns encourages people to commit crimes, who otherwise wouldn't.

Funny how that works.

John Conrad !xknyZgUiTA
05/12/13(Sun)07:20 No.14086590

John Conrad !xknyZgUiTA 05/12/13(Sun)07:20 No.14086590

Replies: >>14086737

>>14085363 (OP)
>Redpill me about guns

guns are a necessary part for for peace between two civil forces that make up a country, the Sovereign (the government) and the people.

peace comes from diplomacy and diplomacy comes when two parties both have something to loose should they fight each other.

imagine two tribes that are vying for a pond to feed their live stock, one has spears the other does not. the armed tribe is free to completely take over the pond without opposition, the unarmed tribe may object but will be passed off with "what are you going to do about it".

the same goes for the two parties of the Social Contract, people and Sovereign. the Social contract dictates that the Sovereign protects the lives and property of the people and acts as contract enforcement and an impartial judge to enforce law common to all men, (not different men making up separate sets of rules, kind of like if you play tag and that one kid would always make some bullshit up to get him out of being it),in return the people leave the state of nature and agree to be ruled by law common to all. Gun control legislation makes it so only one party, the sovereign has the spears, allowing them to take over the pond (in this case completely neglecting their duty to the Social Contract and the constitution for profit and nepotism) unhindered because there is no diplomacy when only one side has something to lose.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:21 No.14086600

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:21 No.14086600

Replies: >>14086648

>>14086440
There are so many confounding variables at play there that those statistics are basically worthless. Honestly, why do you THINK people using a knife to defend themselves are more likely to be injured? Because knives are an ineffective weapon or because carrying knives is more typical of people associated with the criminal underworld?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:22 No.14086618

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:22 No.14086618

Replies: >>14086642

>>14086536
http://theacru.org/acru/harvard%5Fstudy%5Fgun%5Fcontrol%5Fis%5Fcounterproductive/

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:22 No.14086621

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:22 No.14086621

File: 1368357734376.gif-(44 KB, 827x628, 1365541748346.gif)

44 KB GIF

The 2nd amendment was not viewed in mind as only for hunting or only for the military, which the left confuses with the term militia

and no, the national guard is not a militia as it is run by the state and can be taken over by federal powers of the President, the term "Well-Regulated" was used in the 18th century to refer to "in good working order"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo1t0niMt7k

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

notice that the State and The People are separate entities in the eyes of the Founding Fathers, that comma is there by no accident, the People have a clear right to own firearms

http://www.lawnix.com/cases/dc-heller.html

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/rpt/2010-R-0314.htm

The Supreme Court has also ruled that the people do in fact have a right to bear arms, despite the democrats claim that people do not have that right

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:23 No.14086642

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:23 No.14086642

Replies: >>14086678

>>14086618
No PC newsletter is going to control for the proper variables.

Japan has no gun crime and no guns.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:24 No.14086648

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:24 No.14086648

Replies: >>14086727

>>14086600

because knives do not preclude you from being immediately stopped the second it is used against you, adrenaline allows both you and your attacker to continue fighting as you tear each other apart in a literal sense

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:25 No.14086678

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:25 No.14086678

>>14086642
>>14086642
>this Harvard study is bullshit
>>no correlation between gun ownership and homicide rate.
Stop moving the goal post to 'gun crime'

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:27 No.14086707

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:27 No.14086707

>>14086242
It's not crime, mongoloid, it's murder rates

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:28 No.14086727

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:28 No.14086727

Replies: >>14086781 >>14086793 >>14087953

>>14086648
Even guns can't make do that, there was that news story about a guy who was shot several times including in the head and still managed to get away, I don't remember but I think he died later but he was shot by a lady protecting her child in a home invasion.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:28 No.14086737

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:28 No.14086737

>>14086590
this

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:30 No.14086773

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:30 No.14086773

Replies: >>14086802 >>14086809 >>14086818 >>14086819

>>14086563

I like how anon is making fun of the UK (historically low gun rates) for only having 1 (laughs when it reaches 1.5+) out of 100k people killed by guns.

But doesn't bat an eye where it's 10x higher in the US, 10 in 100k.

Gun nuts... >_>

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:30 No.14086781

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:30 No.14086781

>>14086727
I once read about a guy who got stabbed right in the heart and managed to run a full city block before dying. Ask hunters, animals are always doing crazy shit like that after they get shot. Adrenaline's a hell of a drug.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:31 No.14086793

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:31 No.14086793

Replies: >>14086843

File: 1368358296167.jpg-(31 KB, 640x404, 1362108785134.jpg)

31 KB JPG

>>14086727

but you are able to shoot someone from a safe distance, reducing the chance that anything can happen to you, and bullets offer more immediate distruction than a blade

maaaaayyyybbbbeeee not if you were using pic related but thats beside the point

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:31 No.14086802

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:31 No.14086802

>>14086773
>America and the UK are completely identical in ever way other then gun laws
Oh please tell me more about this alternate reality you hail from.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:32 No.14086809

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:32 No.14086809

Replies: >>14086896

>>14086773
Not making fun of UK
Making fun of banning guns because it didn't work

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:33 No.14086818

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:33 No.14086818

Replies: >>14086834

File: 1368358383117.png-(73 KB, 250x193, 250px-Springfield_bear_patrol.png)

73 KB PNG

>>14086773
>ban guns in a country with low homicide rates
>see? they don't have guns and they have low homicide rates

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:33 No.14086819

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:33 No.14086819

>>14086773
>>14086773
Reminder that the uk has had an increase in homicides rate since they introduced anti gun legislation while it has fallen in the us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCzCJzTRtPc

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:33 No.14086834

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:33 No.14086834

Replies: >>14086870

File: 1368358435073.jpg-(116 KB, 1024x768, image.jpg)

116 KB JPG

>>14086818
I would like to buy your rock.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:34 No.14086843

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:34 No.14086843

Replies: >>14086883

>>14086793

>>guns
>>easier to murder with... since that's what they're designed to do

HEY GUYZ, I THINK I KNOW WHY PEOPLE THINK GUNS ARE STUPID AND DESTRUCTIVE

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:35 No.14086870

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:35 No.14086870

Replies: >>14086911

>>14086834
Which episode?

Also why are only white children holding guns?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:36 No.14086883

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:36 No.14086883

Replies: >>14086958

>>14086843
They're certainly destructive (that's what's great about them, sometimes people need to die) but they are not stupid. Well, 1911s are in a modern context. 7 rounds? Fuck off.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:37 No.14086896

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:37 No.14086896

Replies: >>14086914 >>14086915 >>14086964 >>14087113

>>14086809

>>low gun rates
>>low gun murder rates

Were you expecting a 0?

You know where you try to "ban" guns? Not in countries with a 1 in 100k murder rate, but in countries with 10 in 100k murder rate.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:37 No.14086903

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:37 No.14086903

Replies: >>14087730

Daily reminder that UK fakes statistics
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/philipjohnston/3760312/From-knife-crime-to-immigration-you-can-never-believe-a-Labour-statistic.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7402232/Full-scale-of-violent-crime-revealed.html

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:37 No.14086911

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:37 No.14086911

>>14086870
Season 7 Episode 23 – Much Apu About Nothing

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:38 No.14086914

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:38 No.14086914

>>14086896
>Murder rates are only worth trying to lower when they're high enough
libtard logic

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:38 No.14086915

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:38 No.14086915

>>14086896
It did absolutely nothing.
The murder rates stayed the same.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:40 No.14086958

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:40 No.14086958

Replies: >>14086990 >>14087084

File: 1368358812399.jpg-(573 KB, 1536x1152, image.jpg)

573 KB JPG

>>14086883
>implying I don't have 8 round magazines

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:40 No.14086964

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:40 No.14086964

>>14086896
In the same time you banned guns and your murder rates went up and back to the mean, USA didn't ban guns and the murder rates fell rapidly

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:41 No.14086990

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:41 No.14086990

Replies: >>14087007 >>14087015

>>14086958
Oh wow +1 round, that's such an improvement. Glock 21s have 13 nigga, 13.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:42 No.14087005

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:42 No.14087005

http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fuo.pdf

from here we can see that not only do criminals not buy their guns online(you still get a background check when you buy it from the FFL), but they don't use gun shows to avoid background checks

~80% of the time they use friends or illegal street sellers to obtain their guns

a gun background check system does not reduce crime because the system cannot work without a registration which is illegal, the legality of a background check is based on an honor system because there is no way to prove whether that individual underwent a background check for that gun

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:42 No.14087007

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:42 No.14087007

Replies: >>14087051

>>14086990
God damn they are sexy though, just vastly inferior in some regards to modern offerings. Or is the trigger really that much better then a glock or similar?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:43 No.14087015

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:43 No.14087015

Replies: >>14087045

File: 1368358995923.jpg-(330 KB, 1600x1246, image.jpg)

330 KB JPG

>>14086990
Not for long :)

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:44 No.14087045

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:44 No.14087045

Replies: >>14087061 >>14087106

>>14087015
I heard the reason why the limit in new york is seven rounds is because there governer is a massive 1911fag.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:44 No.14087051

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:44 No.14087051

Replies: >>14087103 >>14087136 >>14087140

File: 1368359097740.jpg-(52 KB, 603x415, image.jpg)

52 KB JPG

>>14087007
>dat sexy 1911

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:45 No.14087061

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:45 No.14087061

File: 1368359150062.jpg-(408 KB, 1189x959, image.jpg)

408 KB JPG

>>14087045
heh

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:46 No.14087084

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:46 No.14087084

Replies: >>14087099 >>14087134

>>14086958
>>implying I don't have 8 round magazines

Magazine only holds 7 rounds, chamber holds the last.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087099

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087099

Replies: >>14087121

>>14087084
Nah they do make an 8 round magazine for 1911s, it's not much longer either.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087102

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087102

Replies: >>14087152 >>14087185

>2013
>Not wielding your mighty Katana and annihilating your opponents with a single slash.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087103

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087103

>>14087051
Barrel if warped though and sights probably are off too.

straight outta /k/ompton
05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087106

straight outta /k/ompton 05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087106

Replies: >>14087170

>>14087045
The fact that they have 1911 manufactuerers in NY of course played a role.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087113

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:47 No.14087113

File: 1368359276900.gif-(69 KB, 676x509, history is not on the sid(...).gif)

69 KB GIF

>>14086896

The United States and the UK and Australia have different cultures

the USA has always had a murder rate around 4-5 per 100,000 while the UK has always been about 1-1.5 per 100,000

this has always been the case and the point that we need to focus on why gun control doesn't work is the change in rates, everytime gun control goes up in both the USA and UK there is a spike in violence, while in the case of the United States >>14085785 when gun control is weakened suddenly the homicide rate goes down, I don't have any instances of increase gun rights in the UK reducing violence because I have no examples of increased gun rights in the UK at all

but here in America we can see that gun control, as Penn Gillette put it, is bullshit, bans do not work here, Prohibition of Alcohol did not work, the War on Drugs is a miserable failure, and increased regulations of guns do not work either

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:48 No.14087121

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:48 No.14087121

>>14087099
>Nah they do make an 8 round magazine for 1911s, it's not much longer either.

Ah, thought the one in pic was only a 7 though.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087134

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087134

Replies: >>14087300

>>14087084
I have Kimber 8 round magazines

So that is 8+1 tyvm

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087136

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087136

Replies: >>14087197

File: 1368359348609.jpg-(172 KB, 481x335, cc_carry_11[1].jpg)

172 KB JPG

>>14087051

your 1911 has no class

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087140

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087140

Replies: >>14087197

>>14087051

That gun looks like shit.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087144

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087144

Replies: >>14087211 >>14087216 >>14088224

File: 1368359364178.jpg-(940 KB, 1224x2189, whiteguilt.jpg)

940 KB JPG

>>14086444
Every one of their pictures has a white kid holding guns. They are a racist organization.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087152

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:49 No.14087152

Replies: >>14087220 >>14087275

>>14087102
>Not opting for infinitely superior German Longsword

Got a load of this weaboo

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:50 No.14087170

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:50 No.14087170

>>14087106
That's slightly less bad.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:51 No.14087185

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:51 No.14087185

Replies: >>14087228

>>14087102
Swords are banned to carry in my state.

>624.61 ARMED ASSOCIATION.
>"It shall not be lawful for any body of persons, other than the National Guard, troops of the United States and, with the consent of the governor, sons and daughters of veterans and cadets of educational institutions where military science is taught, to associate themselves together as a military company with arms, but members of social and benevolent organizations are not prohibited from wearing swords. Any violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor."
Source(s):
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=624.61&year=2012

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:51 No.14087197

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:51 No.14087197

Replies: >>14088029

>>14087136
>>14087140
Get a load of these mad jelly plebs.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:52 No.14087211

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:52 No.14087211

>>14087144

Oh look a shitload of stuff that shouldn't be illegal.

Quick we need to be fair, let's make everything else illegal too!

- Paid for by Women

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:52 No.14087216

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:52 No.14087216

Replies: >>14087244

>>14087144

>banning kinder-surprise

BAHAHAHA holy shit america

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:52 No.14087220

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:52 No.14087220

>>14087152
>not using English Backsword

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:53 No.14087228

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:53 No.14087228

Replies: >>14087238

>>14087185
>Swords are banned to carry in my state.

2013, States violating the magna carta.

Shit clearly says every freeman has the right to wield a sword in public.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:53 No.14087238

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:53 No.14087238

Replies: >>14087329 >>14087360

>>14087228
>swords
Battle axe master race reporting in

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:54 No.14087244

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:54 No.14087244

Replies: >>14087262 >>14087287

>>14087216
The ban existed before the candy existed you tard.

Also, they are no longer banned.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:54 No.14087262

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:54 No.14087262

Replies: >>14087273 >>14087279

>>14087244
>Also, they are no longer banned.

Freedom at last, I can finally buy the chocolate I want.

Seriously, this is worth celebrating over?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:55 No.14087273

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:55 No.14087273

>>14087262
No it really is irrelevant.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:55 No.14087275

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:55 No.14087275

Replies: >>14087323 >>14087325 >>14087373

File: 1368359739416.gif-(1.02 MB, 396x224, 1363368073751.gif)

1.02 MB GIF

>>14087152

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:55 No.14087279

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:55 No.14087279

Replies: >>14087309

>>14087262
>Seriously, this is worth celebrating over?

Holy fuck Amerifats, get it together, you banned CANDY?

Holy fuck Amerifats, you didn't ban candy, you want us to suck your dicks?

>blind europoor rage

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:56 No.14087287

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:56 No.14087287

Replies: >>14087306

>>14087244

>kinder-surprise
>candy

WHaaaat the fuck america? Can't you get anything right?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:56 No.14087300

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:56 No.14087300

Replies: >>14087341

>>14087134
>So that is 8+1 tyvm

Alright cool yo jets no need to make me even more jealous...

I live in Canada, I've bin robbed three times and called the police every time, twice they refused to even take a report the other time they said they'd call me back and never did. When I went down to the station they seemed like they'd never gotten a report in the first place.

Can't get a firearm, Police can't protect me, and every time I mention I need a weapon to defend myself, people accuse me of being a terrorist or a danger to society.

At this point, I'd be grateful for a fucking single shot, and I'd built one myself if it wasn't a federal crime with heavy duty jail sentence.

Just nuke Canada, America, there's nothing left here to save.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:57 No.14087306

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:57 No.14087306

Replies: >>14087324

>>14087287
You're saying the chocolate egg isn't candy?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:57 No.14087309

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:57 No.14087309

>>14087279

they banned it on a ticky-tac law that says you can't store physical objects in food you sell

the toy inside the egg is what got it banned

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:57 No.14087323

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:57 No.14087323

>>14087275

That's shopped...

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087324

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087324

Replies: >>14087367

>>14087306

It's chocolate

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087325

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087325

>>14087275
Aw jeez what a totally fair test representative of real world combat scenarios.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087329

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087329

Replies: >>14087427

>>14087238
>Battle axe master race reporting in

How dare you, I'll see you in valhalla!!

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087332

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087332

>>14085870

I had a giggle at "unknown firearm".

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087341

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:58 No.14087341

Replies: >>14087467

File: 1368359934040.jpg-(61 KB, 460x276, image.jpg)

61 KB JPG

>>14087300
Be liberated my Canadian neighbor.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)07:59 No.14087352

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)07:59 No.14087352

Replies: >>14087376 >>14087388 >>14087403 >>14087496

File: 1368359955123.gif-(996 KB, 400x225, 1362913541346.gif)

996 KB GIF

If lieberals, for once, knew what the fuck it was that they were trying to regulate, they wouldn't be liberals.

Look at that shitty trigger discipline in all those pictures. Except for OP's, they all have their fingers literally pressing on the trigger. The fucking very first rule about guns is that you don't put your fucking finger on the trigger unless you have it aimed, ready, and intend to fire in that instant. Don't give me shit about them being kids; somebody set them up that way and didn't correct it.

Half of my mad would be gone if liberals took the time to know how to handle a fucking weapon they're trying to regulate/ban. For all that time you lieberals spend jacking off with tolerance and understanding you sure are incredibly fucking ignorant.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087360

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087360

Replies: >>14087427

>>14087238
What advantages does a battle axe have exactly over a finely made long sword? Sure they hit harder but the long sword is much more nimble and better for stabbing.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087367

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087367

>>14087324
So chocolate is what now, a fruit?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087373

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087373

Replies: >>14087429

>>14087275
You do realize that one is fake right? The real one had the katana get bent

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087376

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:00 No.14087376

File: 1368360053788.jpg-(166 KB, 1340x545, 1362707157457.jpg)

166 KB JPG

>>14087352

protip: people who have no idea what they are doing with guns tend to find them more dangerous

1/2

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:01 No.14087388

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:01 No.14087388

File: 1368360087644.jpg-(105 KB, 670x545, image.jpg)

105 KB JPG

>>14087352
Pretty much see
>>14086430

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:02 No.14087403

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:02 No.14087403

Replies: >>14087426 >>14087446 >>14087468

File: 1368360129125.gif-(1.84 MB, 384x216, why foreigners think guns(...).gif)

1.84 MB GIF

>>14087352

2/2

UK posters ITT might get a kick out of this

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:03 No.14087426

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:03 No.14087426

File: 1368360201275.jpg-(40 KB, 502x508, 1359746907395.jpg)

40 KB JPG

>>14087403
>GUNS ARE BAD BECAUSE IM TOO FUCKING STUPID TO NOT LOOK DOWN THE BARREL
The reaction of the bros in the back was great.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:03 No.14087427

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:03 No.14087427

Replies: >>14087453 >>14087494

File: 1368360202188.jpg-(37 KB, 507x351, image.jpg)

37 KB JPG

>>14087329
>>14087360
Come at me both of you.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:03 No.14087429

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:03 No.14087429

Replies: >>14087480

File: 1368360205812.gif-(1.75 MB, 396x224, 1363368073750.gif)

1.75 MB GIF

>>14087373

yes I know, but I always get a kick out rustling jimmies in a katana vs long sword argument

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:04 No.14087446

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:04 No.14087446

>>14087403
I cringed

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:04 No.14087453

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:04 No.14087453

Replies: >>14087479

>>14087427
Better not miss motherfucker, which you probably will given it's unrifled.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:05 No.14087467

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:05 No.14087467

Replies: >>14087509

>>14087341
>Be liberated my Canadian neighbor.

That shit is highly illegal too and liable to get us Canadians hit with even more than just illegally owning a weapon.

Let's see, they'd probably hit me with illegal transport of weapon or dangerous intelligence over international borders just for downloading it.

Then there's the bullets that I'd probably get a charge for each individual round.

Canada is the Poland of the 21st century.

Just waiting for America to go full fascist and invade us, maybe then I'll be able to get a fucking handgun to protect myself against the fucking niggers.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:05 No.14087468

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:05 No.14087468

Replies: >>14088132

>>14087403
all 3 are stupid in their own unique ways

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087479

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087479

Replies: >>14087493

>>14087453
There is a reason nobody brings battle axes and swords to war anymore.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087480

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087480

Replies: >>14087523

>>14087429
Yeah but what's the point? Longsword > Katana, everybody accepts that, accept for weaboos and japanese people.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087488

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087488

I would gladly give up all guns if it meant we could have medieval style battles again and hundreds of thousands would be slaughtered in a day. And I mean every gun on the planet would be destroyed with no chance of them ever coming back.

I, for one, welcome my feudal overlord.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087493

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087493

Replies: >>14087518 >>14087563

>>14087479
I think you'll find swords where still in common use at the time of flintlock pistols.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087494

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087494

Replies: >>14087522 >>14087563

>>14087427
>Come at me both of you.

Haha that reminds me of the assassination attempt on old Hickory.

Fucker came up with two flintlocks, both misfired.

Bring it on I'll take you out with a bucket of water and a spork.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087496

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:06 No.14087496

>>14087352
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mxtu228bYFw&hd=1

>I'm the prime house co-sponsor on the ban of the high capacity magazines
>I will tell you these [magazines] are ammunition! They're bullets!
>So the people who have those now they're going to shoot them, so if you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the bullets will have been shot and there won't be anymore available

>CO-SPONSOR TO A BILL IN THE UNITED STATES HOUSE
>CAN NOT COMPREHEND THE MOST BASIC FUNCTION OF WHAT HER LEGISLATION OUTLAWS

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087509

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087509

File: 1368360436497.jpg-(84 KB, 689x401, image.jpg)

84 KB JPG

>>14087467
That sucks.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087518

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087518

Replies: >>14087541

>>14087493
>I think you'll find swords where still in common use at the time of flintlock pistols.

>There is a reason nobody brings battle axes and swords to war anymore.

>to war anymore.

>anymore

>2013

NOBODY IS USING FLINTLOCKS ANYMORE

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087522

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087522

>>14087494
Oh yeah forgot about that; unreliable. Also there's the lengthy reload time.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087523

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:07 No.14087523

Replies: >>14087576 >>14087608

>>14087480

katana weebs think anything out of japan is gods gift to the world, they are harder to convince otherwise

but long sword uses have proof that their preferred sword is the better option, so they are easier to upset

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:08 No.14087541

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:08 No.14087541

Replies: >>14087594

>>14087518
You posted a picture of a flintlock m8.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:08 No.14087542

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:08 No.14087542

Replies: >>14087555

File: 1368360519693.jpg-(7 KB, 300x300, quarter[1].jpg)

7 KB JPG

>mfw a plebeian uses a longsword near me

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:09 No.14087555

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:09 No.14087555

Replies: >>14087578 >>14087591

>>14087542
>fighting with sticks
Get a load of this pleb. I'll cut that shit in half bitch and then stab you in the heart. How does that make you feel?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:09 No.14087563

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:09 No.14087563

Replies: >>14087581 >>14087616 >>14088131

File: 1368360588355.jpg-(56 KB, 316x272, image.jpg)

56 KB JPG

>>14087493
>>14087494
My weapons got better and more reliable, how's your fixed blade weapons of war treating you now?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087570

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087570

Replies: >>14087599 >>14087661 >>14087730

Britbong here.
I am of the opinion that the only reason guns should remain legal in the US is because their circulation is too great to just make em disappear.
The UK, I feel, is better off without guns in circulation.

Is this opinion justified? I'm open to "red-pilling".

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087571

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087571

File: 1368360619758.jpg-(36 KB, 428x302, 1368212207052.jpg)

36 KB JPG

#rekt

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087576

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087576

>>14087523
>but long sword uses have proof that their preferred sword is the better option, so they are easier to upset

Longsword is probably better but when it comes down to an unarmored fight it's just going to be whoever is better at that combat style.

Armored though the Katana gets raped by basically any steel sword, Katana are meant to only cut using the tip at high speed where as the entire long sword is sharp up to that second notch which gets used for half swording.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087578

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087578

>>14087555
>You're going to cut through a quarterstaff with a longsword
Good luck. I'll just be beating your ass into submission until you cry like a bitch.

But I won't kill you. I'll make you live with the fact you got asspounded by a man with a stick.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087581

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:10 No.14087581

Replies: >>14087620

>>14087563
They're still useful for survival purposes, and sentry removal. But yeah gun guys won, we all know this, get over it, there's nothing to be proud about taking the man out of war.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:11 No.14087591

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:11 No.14087591

>>14087555

High school detected

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:11 No.14087594

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:11 No.14087594

Replies: >>14087613

>>14087541
>You posted a picture of a flintlock m8.

Bot that wosnt me m8

Com 'ere ya yankey cunt i swore t god ill blast u str8 up the arshole m8

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:11 No.14087599

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:11 No.14087599

Replies: >>14087622

>>14087570
>Is this opinion justified? I'm open to "red-pilling".

When Sharia law is initiated and you're up for execution for being found not to believe in Allah, you might have wanted a gun or two to protect yourself from those mudslimes.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087608

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087608

>>14087523
but but my 10000 folds

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087613

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087613

Replies: >>14087696

>>14087594
Well alright that was the post I was referring to. And bladed weapons do still have some uses in modern conflicts, even if they are pretty marginal. No weapon every truly goes out of use.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087616

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087616

Replies: >>14087643 >>14087664

>>14087563
>My weapons got better and more reliable, how's your fixed blade weapons of war treating you now?

Not great considering those are actually illegal where I live in Canada too.

Seriously I think the limit is 6 inches on a knife here, you can't have a sword or even a sharp stick. Kill me now.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087620

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087620

Replies: >>14087640 >>14087654

File: 1368360757629.gif-(459 KB, 500x338, americanlaptop.gif)

459 KB GIF

>>14087581
>there's nothing to be proud about taking the man out of war.

there's the pride of actually winning

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087622

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:12 No.14087622

>>14087599
I'd like to be red-pilled without the use of hyperbole.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:13 No.14087630

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:13 No.14087630

>>14085978
>Also what does it mean by "union-led gun control" why in the fuck would unions care about guns?
Why indeed?

The union bit is typical /pol/ bullshit. The actual legislation in question was the 1903 dick act that started the transformation of the standard militias into the national guard after the Spanish-American war reminded people that self-regulated and equipped militias actually suck mammoth amounts of cock in real combat situations.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:13 No.14087640

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:13 No.14087640

Replies: >>14087674 >>14087746

>>14087620
Yeah but it was it really you who won, or the weapons? Any 12 year old african child soldier can shoot a man, there's no honour in that, no real skill.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:14 No.14087643

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:14 No.14087643

File: 1368360845492.jpg-(88 KB, 800x458, image.jpg)

88 KB JPG

>>14087616

Sorry Canada

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:14 No.14087654

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:14 No.14087654

>>14087620
I AM PROUD TO BE AN AMERICA
WHERE AT LEAST I KNOW IM FREE

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:14 No.14087661

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:14 No.14087661

>>14087570
>The UK, I feel, is better off without guns in circulation.

Well when you banned handguns your overall violent crime rate spiked above trend.

Banning firearms does seem to lower gun homicide however it raises overall violent crime and homicide for all weapons combined.

So for example if a group of niggers kicks in your door in a home invasion and they have knives, you're fucked, you can't fight off an attacker with a knife unless he's either retarded, you're highly trained, or much bigger, and even then it's a losing battle.

Gun control is the way for the little guy to defend himself or herself.

Anyone who thinks knives\police will protect you have never felt adrenaline.

Two people with knives going at each other, they'll both stab each other for a couple minutes in adrenaline and then fall over dead.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:15 No.14087664

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:15 No.14087664

Replies: >>14087690 >>14087726

>>14087616
I live in Texas. I was arrested by the police for having a six-inch knife in my apartment. Apparently Texas law makes five inches the maximum

Land of the Free, baby.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:15 No.14087674

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:15 No.14087674

Replies: >>14087693 >>14087718

>>14087640
>there's no honour in that, no real skill.

There is no "honour" in war you fucking shitface, there's winners and losers, and from the sounds of your whiny face, you're a loser

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087690

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087690

Replies: >>14087708

>>14087664
>I was arrested by the police for having a six-inch knife in my apartment.

Why the fuck were they in your apartment, shithead? The point of the 4th amendment is to make fuck-retarded laws like that unenforceable.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087693

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087693

Replies: >>14087700

>>14087674
I'm just mourning the end of an age you plebian, can't you just leave me alone? Why must force your modernist brutality on me at every turn?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087696

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087696

Replies: >>14087717

>>14087613
>Well alright that was the post I was referring to. And bladed weapons do still have some uses in modern conflicts, even if they are pretty marginal. No weapon every truly goes out of use.

Bladed weapons aren't going to protect you in a fight against another opponent with a knife though.

You'll both wind up dead in almost every case.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087700

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:16 No.14087700

>>14087693
*you force your

sage
sage 05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087707

sage sage 05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087707

http://vocaroo.com/i/s1w0T7CEtPJT
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1w0T7CEtPJT
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1w0T7CEtPJT

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087708

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087708

Replies: >>14087753

>>14087690
>Why the fuck were they in your apartment, shithead? The point of the 4th amendment is to make fuck-retarded laws like that unenforceable.

>implying police actually have to follow the constitution anymore

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087717

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087717

Replies: >>14087751 >>14087788

>>14087696
True, that's why they're only really good for sentry removal, as I said here>>14086527. Still a use, nice and quiet, unlike your precious guns.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087718

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:17 No.14087718

Replies: >>14087760 >>14087763

>>14087674
>There is no "honour" in war you fucking shitface, there's winners and losers, and from the sounds of your whiny face, you're a loser

What about if an invading army is coming to kill your families and children?

Is fighting off the invaders in war not honorable?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:18 No.14087726

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:18 No.14087726

Replies: >>14087737

File: 1368361099003.jpg-(188 KB, 1024x768, image.jpg)

188 KB JPG

>>14087664
What the actual fuck?
So a Bowie knife is illegal in Texas?

Remember the Alamo indeed.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:18 No.14087730

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:18 No.14087730

Replies: >>14088290

File: 1368361115806.jpg-(277 KB, 1000x1486, HF[1].jpg)

277 KB JPG

>>14087570

according to >>14086065 the UK is in the exact same spot they were before the gun ban, but according to these links >>14086903 the UKs political parties altered the way statistics are collected in order to make the country appear safer, like Hot Fuzz but in real life

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:18 No.14087737

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:18 No.14087737

>>14087726
That grip doesn't look too comfortable.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:19 No.14087746

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:19 No.14087746

>>14087640
Any 5ft 90 pound jap can cut a man with a piece of metal, there's not honour in that, no real skill. A real man fights with his fists.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:19 No.14087751

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:19 No.14087751

Replies: >>14087796

>>14087717
>Still a use, nice and quiet, unlike your precious guns.

Well first they aren't MY precious guns, like I said I'm Canadian and can't own one.

Guns statistically are the best self defense weapon by far, you have the greatest chance of fighting off the attacker with one.

Tazer is worthless against multiple attackers or even a single one at times, knife fight leaves you both dead, fists you're dead, stick you're dead, I think you get the picture.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:19 No.14087753

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:19 No.14087753

Replies: >>14087806

>>14087708
>implying police actually have to follow the constitution anymore

If you go to court and show that police were in your house with no warrant, 90% of the time you will win.

Did the police kick down your door? Then you have a really good argument that it was an illegal search.

Did you let the police into your apartment willingly? Then you're an idiot.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:20 No.14087760

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:20 No.14087760

>>14087718
It might be honorable to fight, but you don't have to fight honorably.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:20 No.14087763

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:20 No.14087763

Replies: >>14087848

>>14087718
>Is fighting off the invaders in war not honorable?

according to this one guy, not if you use guns since there's no skill

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:20 No.14087779

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:20 No.14087779

>>14086492

>toplel.jpg

Knives are a tool for stealth takedowns. You lose the element of surprise, and a knife is as useless as tits on a bull.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:21 No.14087783

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:21 No.14087783

File: 1368361261957.jpg-(164 KB, 845x822, think of the chilluns.jpg)

164 KB JPG

regarding accidents and suicides with guns... accidental gun deaths are a statistical blip and japan has way more suicides than we do and they have a total gun ban.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:21 No.14087788

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:21 No.14087788

Replies: >>14087900

>>14087717
>>14087717
If you're going for stealth, why not just use a crossbow? Still better than your silly bladed weapons.

Or you know, use subsonic ammo with a suppressor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6z4HgrU4TQ

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:21 No.14087796

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:21 No.14087796

Replies: >>14087833

>>14087751
It's cool bro, I'm ausfalian, at least you guys can even get semi-autos.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:22 No.14087806

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:22 No.14087806

Replies: >>14087837

>>14087753
>Did the police kick down your door? Then you have a really good argument that it was an illegal search.

They always use the exigent circumstances bullshit.

"Oh I thought I saw blood, I thought I heard a crying baby, I thought I saw a gun" etc

It gets used constantly and mostly after the fact, as in.

They will break in, have a look around, and then claim they saw something they find from your doorway, hence exigent circumstance.

It's fucked up but that's what's happening.

As for just letting them in ya that's pretty dumb but I don't think the poster knew the knife was illegal.

If you think you're being a law abiding citizen and you let them in just so they don't put you on some list, and then they hit you with a law you didn't even know existed, what can you really do?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:23 No.14087833

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:23 No.14087833

Replies: >>14087874 >>14087875 >>14087876

>>14087796
>It's cool bro, I'm ausfalian, at least you guys can even get semi-autos.

No those are restricted.

The only non-restricted firearm we have here is a double barrel shotgun, and even those you need to pass a several day training course way out in the boonies, then pay 500$+ for the license, wait a month+ to get it, and then you're put into the Long Rifle database.

Even after all that, you still have to keep the ammo in a completely separate cabinet, you have to have a licensed gun safe, and you can't load the firearm within the city limits, not even if your house is broken into.

Ya, it's that bad.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:23 No.14087837

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:23 No.14087837

Replies: >>14087913

>>14087806
>They always use the exigent circumstances bullshit.

>"Oh I thought I saw blood, I thought I heard a crying baby, I thought I saw a gun" etc

If there is no baby in your house then what the fuck did they hear? Exigent circumstances really need to be followed up with some sort of evidence to turn up how those circumstances came about.

>If you think you're being a law abiding citizen and you let them in just so they don't put you on some list, and then they hit you with a law you didn't even know existed, what can you really do?

You can learn to be a law-abiding citizen and not let police into your home.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:24 No.14087848

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:24 No.14087848

>>14087763
Don't get me wrong there's plenty of skill in using a gun, I love guns, and they require plenty of skill. It's just not as much as swords, fucking swords man, imagine seeing what that's like, it's not even possible any more, that martial art died out. And what replaced it (guns) is just so clinical and mechanical by comparison, so unlike swordfighting. I'm pining for a lost age, can't you understand?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:25 No.14087874

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:25 No.14087874

File: 1368361531481.jpg-(53 KB, 400x400, image.jpg)

53 KB JPG

>>14087833
Dear god Canada.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:25 No.14087875

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:25 No.14087875

>>14087833

Not to mention the training course actually tests you on firearms such as the wheel lock, flint lock, switch lock, and a bunch of other centuries old shit nobody ever uses anymore and that aren't even legal.

You basically have to know the anatomy of every gun, forever, and if you get even 10% of it wrong you have to retake the test and pay the fee again.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:25 No.14087876

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:25 No.14087876

Replies: >>14087931

>>14087833
All guns are restricted here in ausfalia, and it's basically impossible to get an AR-15 or something like that unless your like a top level professional hunter or something. I'm pretty sure it isn't as bad as that in Canada.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:26 No.14087900

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:26 No.14087900

Replies: >>14087922 >>14087949 >>14087968

>>14087788
Crossbows can be surprisingly noisy, as are suppressed guns with subsonics. Nothing can truly compare in quitness to a simple knife thrust, although those two do certainly come close.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:26 No.14087913

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:26 No.14087913

Replies: >>14087964 >>14088023

>>14087837
>You can learn to be a law-abiding citizen and not let police into your home.

You realize that's impossible considering how many pages in laws there are now?

That texas law about the 6 inch blade was probably hidden within about 100,000 pages of irrelevant legislative gibberish.

Without a legal team you are basically breaking multiple laws every day.

>Exigent circumstances really need to be followed up with some sort of evidence to turn up how those circumstances came about.

That's why you should've read the next line where I mentioned there's plenty of cases of them breaking in and then making up an exigent reason after the fact.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:27 No.14087922

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:27 No.14087922

>>14087900
*quietness

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:27 No.14087931

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:27 No.14087931

>>14087876
>All guns are restricted here in ausfalia, and it's basically impossible to get an AR-15 or something like that unless your like a top level professional hunter or something. I'm pretty sure it isn't as bad as that in Canada.

Well I'm not going to bother playing the game of "who has it worse" because neither of us really has an effective way of acquiring a self defense weapon.

Either way we are both restricted far beyond what should be allowed for reasonable self defense.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087937

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087937

Replies: >>14088300

File: 1368361689994.png-(84 KB, 540x371, UK is not safer.png)

84 KB PNG

Does this look more accurate?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087949

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087949

>>14087900
Okay Mr. Ninja

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087953

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087953

Replies: >>14087987 >>14087998

>>14086727

That was in georgia, and she wasn't a good shot. The head shot was a grazing. She was also using .38 ball, if the police report is to be believed, good for target plinking, but not capable of quickly stopping an attacker.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087964

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:28 No.14087964

Replies: >>14087999

>>14087913
>then making up an exigent reason after the fact.

I'm saying that exigent circumstances don't hold up in court if they actually have to prove that those exigent circumstances existed.

>I saw blood on the floor
>Did you take a picture of it?

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:29 No.14087968

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:29 No.14087968

Replies: >>14088146

>>14087900
>Crossbows can be surprisingly noisy, as are suppressed guns with subsonics. Nothing can truly compare in quitness to a simple knife thrust, although those two do certainly come close.

The only case in which a knife would work as a self defense weapon is if your attacker was coming at you bare handed.

Against another knife adrenaline kicks in for both of you and you stab each other to death long before the pain even kicks in.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14087987

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14087987

Replies: >>14088009

>>14087953
>not capable of quickly stopping an attacker.

Ball ammo can stop an attacker plenty good. It's just not the best at firing at people as hollowpoints are.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14087998

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14087998

>>14087953
That is kinda the point and why I have a .45 on my nightstand.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14087999

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14087999

Replies: >>14088027 >>14088036 >>14088046

>>14087964
>I'm saying that exigent circumstances don't hold up in court if they actually have to prove that those exigent circumstances existed.

What I mean is this:

>cop kicks open door
>opens drawer
>finds knife in drawer, places it on top of drawer top
>oh look at this, a dangerous weapon, exigent circumstance

This happens all the time. They break in and then create a scenario in which entering would have been permitted after the fact.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14088009

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:30 No.14088009

Replies: >>14088257

>>14087987
>Ball ammo can stop an attacker plenty good. It's just not the best at firing at people as hollowpoints are.

Ever seen someone get hit by a musket? Say goodbye to a good portion of your upper torso.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088010

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088010

>>14086050
Probably not.

With a big enough ad campaign, you can make any cause seem stupid. like the whole smoking is evil campaign in the UK with the smoke physically strangling a sleeping baby.

Most smokers aren't even trying to justify it nowadays. (like you see alcohol users doing)

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088023

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088023

Replies: >>14088080

>>14087913

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfdEbe7e9GE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

you need to brush up on your rights, its not that difficult

this one is more staged to demonstrate ideal situations to deal with police and is meant for nigs but its still useful

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4nQ_mFJV4I

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088027

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088027

>>14087999
>This happens all the time. They break in and then create a scenario in which entering would have been permitted after the fact.

trips for truth

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088029

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:31 No.14088029

Replies: >>14088199

File: 1368361905059.jpg-(668 KB, 1632x1224, photo.jpg)

668 KB JPG

>>14087197
nope.jpg

those are the ones I could reach without getting up.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:32 No.14088036

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:32 No.14088036

Replies: >>14088104

>>14087999
>oh look at this, a dangerous weapon, exigent circumstance

What? Exigent circumstances are reason for breaking your 4th amendment rights due to someone being in great danger or there's probably evidence being destroyed. Look it up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigent_circumstances

They need damn good a reason to bust down your door. If they make up a reason and it's found that they made it up, then all evidence they found was found illegally and can't be used in court.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:32 No.14088046

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:32 No.14088046

File: 1368361962591.jpg-(97 KB, 600x438, image.jpg)

97 KB JPG

>>14087999
>cop kicks in door
>cop gets filled with lead from a well armed citizen
Get your shit together Texas

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:34 No.14088080

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:34 No.14088080

>>14088023
>you need to brush up on your rights, its not that difficult

There are hundreds of thousands of pages of legislation that apply to every person regardless of state.

Even if you spent now til the end of your life researching 24\7 no food no sleep no shits you still couldn't keep up.

They are literally passing legislation faster then you can stay informed on it by yourself.

See the affordable care act, good god that one piece would take years to decipher without a full legal team.

Yes there are basic laws, but then there are state laws and municipal ordinances.

For example the thing with the 6 inch blade limit would be tucked within an endless stream of bureaucratic bullshit which is impossible to keep up with.

Things used to be easier in the way you are describing, but now the legislation is deliberately made impossible to keep up with so they can nail you on just about anything should they ever get you on their radar.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:34 No.14088089

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:34 No.14088089

Replies: >>14088153

>Redpill me about guns

SCENARIO A:

>nigger breaks into house
>father brutalized
>mother raped
>kids traumatized
>valuables stolen
>other niggers encouraged to break into more homes


SCENARIO B:

>nigger breaks into house
>dad shoots him dead
>family protected
>kids stay safely in their rooms until police come
>property remains inside home
>other niggers look for other ways to make money instead of home invasions


If you were thinking of breaking into a house, but then some other coon just got his guts splattered for breaking into a house, wouldn't it be a hell of a lot harder to work up the nerve to do it yourself? On the other hand, if there were lots of highly successful home invasions and the homeowners were helpless victims then it would seem like easy pickings.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:34 No.14088092

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:34 No.14088092

everyone ITT should watch this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyjvlvRZrz8

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:35 No.14088104

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:35 No.14088104

>>14088036
>What? Exigent circumstances are reason for breaking your 4th amendment rights due to someone being in great danger or there's probably evidence being destroyed. Look it up.

I didn't say they didn't.

I said they create that circumstance after they broke in to cover it up...

>They need damn good a reason to bust down your door. If they make up a reason and it's found that they made it up, then all evidence they found was found illegally and can't be used in court.

I don't think you realize that they make up reasons with impunity these days, courts throw out cases and almost none ever make it to trial, and those that do spent over a hundred thousand dollars on a legal team.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:36 No.14088131

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:36 No.14088131

>>14087563
Too wounded to live. Too precious to let die

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:36 No.14088132

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:36 No.14088132

>>14087468

I always like Tiff Needell, myself.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:37 No.14088134

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:37 No.14088134

Replies: >>14088174 >>14088184

Daily reminder to all Gun loving losers: Statistics show that gun owners are more likely to harm a member of their household are caused by irresponsible gun owners, and that tragedies such as school shootings will not lead to fundamental change in gun laws because both Democrats and Republicans favor guns.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:37 No.14088146

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:37 No.14088146

>>14087968
Yeah I've already said that multiple times, knives are only really good for surprise attacks. You're completely correct otherwise.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:37 No.14088153

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:37 No.14088153

Replies: >>14088177

>>14088089

SCENARIO C
> nigger breaks into your house
> shoots you dead
> rapes family at leisure
> shots them
> steals everything

SCENARIO D
> nigger breaks into your house
> you shoot him
> court rules in his favor and you pay him for breaking into your house an getting shot for the rest of your life


It's not all good my conservative fellow

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088174

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088174

>>14088134
>bullshit statistics and lies
Tell me more.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088176

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088176

File: 1368362365658.jpg-(364 KB, 1537x681, 1366386119220.jpg)

364 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWoLGC-n4i4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088177

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088177

>>14088153
>> nigger breaks into your house
>> you shoot him
>> court rules in his favor and you pay him for breaking into your house an getting shot for the rest of your life

Not in glorious North Carolina, friend. If someone breaks into my house here, I am told by law to assume they are armed and intend to do me harm, so lethal force is 100% justified.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088182

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088182

>>14085363 (OP)
All I know is that no one is gonna try to rape the little girl on the right...

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088184

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:39 No.14088184

>>14088134
>and that tragedies such as school shootings will not lead to fundamental change in gun laws because both Democrats and Republicans favor guns.
I am happy to hear this.

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:40 No.14088199

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:40 No.14088199

Replies: >>14088222 >>14088230

File: 1368362427643.jpg-(32 KB, 600x461, 1364131213904.jpg)

32 KB JPG

>>14088029
Alright now I'm jelly!

>tfw ausfalian

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:41 No.14088222

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:41 No.14088222

>>14088199

>move to the USA
>protect your right to own guns by voting libertarian/republican
>???
>profit

Anonymous
05/12/13(Sun)08:42 No.14088224

Anonymous 05/12/13(Sun)08:42 No.14088224

Replies: >>14088244 >>14088248

>>14087144
Why not pools?