Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)01:57 No.9551383

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)01:57 No.9551383

Replies: >>9551407

File: 1359097040245.jpg-(52 KB, 610x456, laughing jew.jpg)

52 KB JPG

>macro-economics

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)01:57 No.9551392

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)01:57 No.9551392

Replies: >>9551407

>>9551362 (OP)
you're a communist socialist and a liberal facist.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)01:58 No.9551407

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)01:58 No.9551407

>>9551383
>>9551392
Can't handle the truth? Your savior's economic policy is a bluff on basic fact

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)01:58 No.9551408

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)01:58 No.9551408

Replies: >>9551440

File: 1359097120057.jpg-(25 KB, 360x337, Boromir.jpg)

25 KB JPG

Prove that trickle down economics EXISTS?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)01:58 No.9551410

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)01:58 No.9551410

Replies: >>9551440 >>9552048

>>9551362 (OP)

Pretty much every econ book?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)01:59 No.9551416

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)01:59 No.9551416

Replies: >>9551440

This is a forum slide. They are trying to bury:

>>9550386 →

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:00 No.9551440

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:00 No.9551440

Replies: >>9551463

>>9551408
>>9551410
It's very simple, isn't it?
>>9551416
MIDF rightist scum. NO one cares about about your stupid Muslim agenda, disinfofriend

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:02 No.9551463

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:02 No.9551463

Replies: >>9551503

>>9551440

>It's very simple, isn't it?

You're just asking a question that doesn't make any sense. I'm guessing English isn't your first language.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:03 No.9551481

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:03 No.9551481

>>9551362 (OP)
Spoiler: it doesn't exist. Trickle down is the unicorn of professional economic opinion: it never really existed in the first place but a few rich guys told you it did therefore it is more real than your life.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:04 No.9551503

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:04 No.9551503

Replies: >>9551542

>>9551463
>You're just asking a question that doesn't make any sense.

Trickle-down doesn't exist, friend. It is up to you to prove it does. Do you speak English, friend?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:07 No.9551542

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:07 No.9551542

Replies: >>9551651

>>9551503

>Trickle-down doesn't exist, friend. It is up to you to prove it does. Do you speak English, friend?

I don't care if it does or doesn't "exist", the way you framed the question(and even talking about it now) doesn't make any sense.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:12 No.9551651

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:12 No.9551651

>>9551542
You're right, it doesn't make any sense. Because it never existed in the first place, yet we venerate it.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:13 No.9551677

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:13 No.9551677

Replies: >>9551720

Who da fuck cares about rich peoples money man I work tomorrow gimme some fucking money

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:15 No.9551720

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:15 No.9551720

>>9551677
But who invests in your jab, Lamar? If its trickle-down, you have Mr. Schaffer to thank for your job and better do your best to please the "job creators" or your entire life is sunk.
If its just random chance, well, it seems you have a lucky fortune.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:22 No.9551864

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:22 No.9551864

Replies: >>9552048

>>9551362 (OP)
ITT: No one can defend a huge plank of the Republishit party.
NoOneIsSurprised.jpg

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:24 No.9551911

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:24 No.9551911

Replies: >>9552001

No economist has ever actually used the term 'trickle-down' to refer to any sort of economic theory.

Its a made up term. Literally a social construct.

So there will be no papers that do so much as MENTION it.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:27 No.9551971

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:27 No.9551971

>>9551362 (OP)
NO ONE can submit peer-reviewed sources to back up the most common belief help by Repubishits? Wow. You're a fucking disgrace, whiteman. The dems deserve their 2014 AND 2016 victories.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:28 No.9552001

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:28 No.9552001

Replies: >>9552251

>>9551911
Neat.
So we can conclude that this major plank of the Republican Party never actually existed outside of campaign promises? Do you realize what you've just admitted?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:31 No.9552048

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:31 No.9552048

Replies: >>9552722

>>9551864

See

>>9551410

Ignoring opposing opinions and claim victory is expected of stupid people.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)02:43 No.9552251

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)02:43 No.9552251

Replies: >>9552722

>>9552001

Which plank are you even referring to?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:06 No.9552722

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:06 No.9552722

Replies: >>9552756

>>9552048
>>9552251
You've just admitted by your pleb attempts to defend the indefensible that there are no PEER REVIEWED studies that support this.
I accept the conservative surrender.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:08 No.9552756

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:08 No.9552756

Replies: >>9552791

File: 1359101300530.jpg-(72 KB, 960x720, Trickle down.jpg)

72 KB JPG

>>9552722

... show me a single economist or politician who has posited trickle down economics as a serious idea.

I'll wait.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:08 No.9552760

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:08 No.9552760

Replies: >>9552805

>>9551362 (OP)
>challenge someone to give good sources
>demand 10 second reply
>surprised when every reasonable person ignores your thread

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:10 No.9552791

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:10 No.9552791

Replies: >>9552834

>>9552756
...Are you fucking serious? Reagan, Laffer, Reisman, Stockman, etc.
What the fuck are you smoking, babby? Were you not alive then? WTF?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:12 No.9552805

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:12 No.9552805

>>9552760
>implying ten second reply threads are not the norm on 4chin
Exactly what the FUCK is wrong with Republicans tonight? Why can't they defend their own commonly held tenets?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:14 No.9552834

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:14 No.9552834

Replies: >>9552895

>>9552791

Show me a SINGLE instance of them positing that wealth would 'trickle down.' Just one. I'm still fucking waiting.

Were YOU alive then?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:17 No.9552895

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:17 No.9552895

Replies: >>9552908 >>9553038

>>9552834
That occupies many planks of the '84 campaign.
I literally have no need to prove anything to you because this exists in the realm of public domain and common knowledge.
Are you serious? You're seriously trying to refute that Reagan rallied for trickle-down and less government? How delusional are you? Do you understand that history is recorded, even when it is know seen as unpopular? Why do you disgrace your party?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:18 No.9552908

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:18 No.9552908

>>9552895
"*rallied against"

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:25 No.9553011

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:25 No.9553011

Replies: >>9553473

>You have ten seconds to submit PEER REVIEWED/accepted studys that prove Trickle Down Economics exists on a MACRO scale.
So you're arguing that we don't currently have a trickle down economics system? Why all the butthurt then?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:27 No.9553038

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:27 No.9553038

Replies: >>9553451

>>9552895

Is that the best you can do?

You can't offer a single instance of a single person saying that the wealth would trickle down?

>his exists in the realm of public domain and common knowledge.

Which is to say that you're repeating a political meme that you believe because its all you've ever been told and you've never bothered to check that it referred to anything real.

Please convince me that you can back your beliefs with something other than your beliefs.

I have made no claims about Reagan whatsoever. I'm trying to figure out why the fuck you can't prove YOUR claims.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:56 No.9553451

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:56 No.9553451

Replies: >>9553618

>>9553038
HAHAHAHAHHAHA
"David Stockman, who as Reagan's budget director championed these cuts at first but then became skeptical of them, told journalist William Greider that the "supply-side economics" is the trickle-down idea: "It's kind of hard to sell 'trickle down,' so the supply-side formula was the only way to get a tax policy that was really 'trickle down.' Supply-side is 'trickle-down' theory."

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:57 No.9553473

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:57 No.9553473

Replies: >>9553506

>>9553011
I'm arguing that no one can define one of the major platforms the current Republican discourse is based on, yes.
Isn't that really fucking sad?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)03:59 No.9553506

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)03:59 No.9553506

Replies: >>9553536

>>9553473
You say no one can define it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics
Wikipedia can!

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)04:00 No.9553513

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)04:00 No.9553513

Replies: >>9553536

Macro as in outside America? Who cares how it effects those idiots.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)04:01 No.9553536

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)04:01 No.9553536

>>9553506
No Republican't has been able to accuraelty define this tax policy at all. Thanks for the wiki, doc.
>>9553513
You mean people more enlightened than us have different policies? How fucking dare they?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)04:08 No.9553618

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)04:08 No.9553618

Replies: >>9554579

File: 1359104912758.jpg-(15 KB, 271x299, Prove it.jpg)

15 KB JPG

>>9553451

Herpy doodle doo, that's the best you can do?

"Speaking on the Senate floor in 1992, Sen. Hank Brown said, "Mr. President, the trickle-down theory attributed to the Republican Party has never been articulated by President Reagan and has never been articulated by President Bush and has never been advocated by either one of them. One might argue whether trickle down makes any sense or not. To attribute to people who have advocated the opposite in policies is not only inaccurate but poisons the debate on public issues."

Proving the point well, thank you.

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)05:10 No.9554579

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)05:10 No.9554579

Replies: >>9554693

>>9553618
"Speaking on the Senate floor in 1992" so after any kind of backlash that could be attributed to Reagan or Bush 41, there was something that might have been close to an issue that we might have said might not be trickle down.
Weak as FUCK.
You're not even trying, are you, millennials?

Anonymous
01/25/13(Fri)05:19 No.9554693

Anonymous 01/25/13(Fri)05:19 No.9554693

>>9554579
Yeah, weak as fuck. Millennial babbys have fucking nothing, its status quo