Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:37 No.9664233

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:37 No.9664233

File: 1359401827031.jpg-(173 KB, 600x419, youmakemeasandwhich.jpg)

173 KB JPG

>>9664196

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:38 No.9664274

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:38 No.9664274

Go back to retarddit dumbass

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:38 No.9664276

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:38 No.9664276

>>9664196

>men and women evolved differently

we're the same SPECIES, we evolve the same (as long as we're interbreeding and gene flow occurs). Learn evolution before you talk about it.

maybe we evolve so that the sexes are different, but we all are evolving to have that trait (which is a trait of human populations, not of men or women).

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:38 No.9664296

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:38 No.9664296

File: 1359401932071.jpg-(20 KB, 456x537, 1318419336350.jpg)

20 KB JPG

Butthurt liberal spam incoming

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:46 No.9664500

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:46 No.9664500

>>9664365

That one is twice as funny, coming from a liberal.

Anonymous
sage 01/28/13(Mon)14:48 No.9664588

sage Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:48 No.9664588

Replies: >>9664619

>>9664527
Reminder to sage and not respond, this is your official reminder.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:49 No.9664619

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:49 No.9664619

>>9664588
But if you sage, you won't bump!

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:51 No.9664670

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:51 No.9664670

>le shitty forced meme

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:53 No.9664750

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:53 No.9664750

>le yellow cartoon man

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:54 No.9664770

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:54 No.9664770

le nice teethed boy

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)14:57 No.9664872

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)14:57 No.9664872

Replies: >>9665004

Meh, needs more butthurt

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:01 No.9665004

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:01 No.9665004

Replies: >>9665034

>>9664872
The stormshits learned how to hide threads. They never really bothered to address these pictures, they just call them "strawmen" and pretend like people don't frequently base their beliefs on double standards... at least not right-wing people. Nope: only leftists are capable of cognitive dissonance and never conservatives.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:02 No.9665034

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:02 No.9665034

Replies: >>9665089

File: 1359403357449.jpg-(37 KB, 251x251, 1328082745728.jpg)

37 KB JPG

>>9665004

Translation: OP is assmad that people don't like his shit meme.

sage and hide
01/28/13(Mon)15:03 No.9665086

sage and hide 01/28/13(Mon)15:03 No.9665086

Replies: >>9665120 >>9665226 >>9665382 >>9665526

>>9664166 (OP)
>doesn't understand the difference between being insulted and having someone take him seriously enough to argue with

>>9664196
Nobody argues that men and women evolves separately due to their gender roles. Men and women did not evolve separately, nor were the gender roles the reason for the disparity between sexes. Rather, the disparity between sexes is the reason for gender roles.

>>9664285
/pol/acks and stormfags are not interchangeable groups.

>>9664365
>implying this has ever fucking happened on /pol/

>>9664395
Cite an instance of a /pol/ack taking credit for someone else's work without being called a nigger, a kike, a stormfag or just being laughed at.

>>9664432
Again, this does not happen. This is not something that is discussed here.

>>9664460
/pol/ is made up of hundreds, possibly thousands of people. It is therefore reasonable to presume that there will be conflicting opinions posted by *SPOILER* different people.

>>9664527
You're actually suggesting that all "right-wing" sources are biased, and are therefore just as bad as the kid in the pic.

>>9664560
Meat was the most important factor in our evolution (hint: think essential fats)

>>9664583
the implication here is that everything anti-commies say is not factual. Like the previous example, you're actually just as fucking bad as what you're ripping on.

>>9664615
>>9664649
>ad hominem

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:04 No.9665089

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:04 No.9665089

Replies: >>9665375

>>9665034
The truth hurts. Few people like things that hurt them.

sage
sage 01/28/13(Mon)15:04 No.9665099

sage sage 01/28/13(Mon)15:04 No.9665099

File: 1359403460664.jpg-(8 KB, 218x231, gdgdf.jpg)

8 KB JPG

Nobody even clicks on your gay pics.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:04 No.9665120

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:04 No.9665120

>>9665086

/thread

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:07 No.9665198

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:07 No.9665198

Replies: >>9665446

File: 1359403631163.png-(25 KB, 650x646, 1327973661860.png)

25 KB PNG

>tfw someone actually took the time to create all of these images
>tfw absolutely nobody gives a shit

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:07 No.9665218

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:07 No.9665218

>>9664166 (OP)
The most forced meme ever to meme.

sage and hide
01/28/13(Mon)15:08 No.9665226

sage and hide 01/28/13(Mon)15:08 No.9665226

Replies: >>9665446

>>9665086

>>9664677
Give me an example of some non-white capitalist countries that are poor.
I mean, look at all the starving gooks devoid of any opportunity in Hong Kong and Singapore. Oh wait.

>>9664716
When capitalist countries succeed, it is due to capitalism being allowed to flourish. If they do not succeed, it is almost always as a result of international pressure of a corrupt bureaucracy.

>>9664752
Denying that academia has an ideological bias is denying reality. How many conservative sociologists do you follow, oh anon?

>>9664793
Again, /pol/acks and stormfags are not the same thing. Also, nice flag.

>>9664817
>implying people actually say this

>>9664841
Without looking at either statistic, we cannot comment. However, more often than not, all statistics are biased, regardless of the argument they are being used to support
>moot point

>>9664914
>thinking everyone on /pol/ is the same
>not realising different people post different things

>>9665022
>ad hominem
>muh privilege

>>9665066
>muh hyperbole

We done here, OP?

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:11 No.9665320

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:11 No.9665320

Replies: >>9665404

>>9665269
>Greeks
>White
JIDF pls go.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:12 No.9665375

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:12 No.9665375

>>9665089
It doesn't hurt, asshole, because it's always a strawman. It's boring, obnoxious, and most unforgivably, unfunny. You're trying to force a meme down everyone's throats and we're telling you to suck YOUR OWN dick.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:13 No.9665382

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:13 No.9665382

Replies: >>9665479 >>9665568

>>9665086
>doesn't understand the difference between being insulted and having someone take him seriously enough to argue with
That's just a cop out to avoid arguing. The only way the conservative majority on this board can re-affirm its beliefs is by posting "liberal logic" and saying liberals are crazy. You don't prove your points so much as you try to discredit the opposition.

>Nobody argues that men and women evolves separately due to their gender roles. Men and women did not evolve separately, nor were the gender roles the reason for the disparity between sexes. Rather, the disparity between sexes is the reason for gender roles.
Our behavior and traits that we look for in a mate is what directs the course of our evolution. By changing our behavior and the traits we favor in our mates, we can direct the course of our evolution since we are no longer affected by our environment in the same way that we were thousands of years ago (since we have learned to shape the environment to suit our needs). Many people appeal to evolution to justify gender roles while at the same time pretending like these gender roles are now static and unchangeable and that our present biological condition is the ultimate truth. I have spent plenty of time debating with these people on /pol/.

>implying this has ever fucking happened on /pol/
It happened in the last one of these threads, actually.

>Cite an instance of a /pol/ack taking credit for someone else's work without being called a nigger, a kike, a stormfag or just being laughed at.
The male supremacists that justify their "superiority" over women by citing all the male inventors and scientists while having done jack shit themselves, and ignoring that women were ever even free to work and pursue an education in the West for a few decades, whereas men had hundreds of years of relative liberty by comparison.

>Again, this does not happen. This is not something that is discussed here.
You must be new then. I've seen it happen.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:13 No.9665395

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:13 No.9665395

bumping this thread
fuck this board

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:13 No.9665404

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:13 No.9665404

>>9665320
Stupid JIDF. Obligatory:
>Kikes
>White

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:15 No.9665432

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:15 No.9665432

>>9665269
So it's ok to use logical fallacies if White People didn't say that it wasn't??

EVERYONE BUT WHITES proven as shit-tier.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:15 No.9665446

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:15 No.9665446

>>9665198

hahaha tell that to the butthurt anon here:

>>9665226

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:16 No.9665473

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:16 No.9665473

Replies: >>9665527

>people think you can have a decent discussion about anything
>on fucking 4chan
i find it so funny that you people take yourselves seriously

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:16 No.9665479

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:16 No.9665479

>>9665382
>The male supremacists that justify their "superiority" over women by citing all the male inventors and scientists while having done jack shit themselves, and ignoring that women were ever even free to work and pursue an education in the West for a few decades, whereas men had hundreds of years of relative liberty by comparison.
Over 9000% of Womyn are fucking retarded. That's the end of that argument.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:18 No.9665526

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:18 No.9665526

Replies: >>9665585

>>9665086
>You're actually suggesting that all "right-wing" sources are biased, and are therefore just as bad as the kid in the pic.
Just like most people on /pol/ suggests all left-wing sources are biased and all biased sources are also left-wing (unless they complement the right-wing agenda)?

>Meat was the most important factor in our evolution (hint: think essential fats)
So people could not have simply evolved differently without meat? We would just all have died out?

And if meat was an important factor in our evolution, was it less important than vegetables and grains? Are you suggesting that we would die without one (meat) but not the other?

>the implication here is that everything anti-commies say is not factual.
Actually, the implication was that the world is not black and white and that not only one side is capable of lying or exaggerating facts.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:18 No.9665527

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:18 No.9665527

>>9665473
>People on the internet are no longer people,

Freedom Fighter
01/28/13(Mon)15:18 No.9665545

Freedom Fighter 01/28/13(Mon)15:18 No.9665545

Replies: >>9665610

>implying every liberal debate is not said liberal simply going over typical mantra with emotionalistic responses, no facts, no evidence, no statistics, no proof and pretending that a terrible history of their policies they try to admit doesnt exist.

> saddddddd

Sage and hide
01/28/13(Mon)15:19 No.9665568

Sage and hide 01/28/13(Mon)15:19 No.9665568

>>9665382
>That's just a cop out to avoid arguing. The only way the conservative majority on this board can re-affirm its beliefs is by posting "liberal logic" and saying liberals are crazy. You don't prove your points so much as you try to discredit the opposition.
This board isn't majority conservatives. There are libertarians, anarchists, partisans, national socialists and everything in between. If you start a liberal logic thread, you'll soon see liberal posters popping up and dismantling bullshit arguments. The same is true of any bullshit that is spouted, unless it's directly related t MUH HAPPENING.

>By changing our behavior and the traits we favor in our mates, we can direct the course of our evolution since we are no longer affected by our environment in the same way that we were thousands of years ago (since we have learned to shape the environment to suit our needs).
Over hundreds of thousands of years, and with a concentrated effort from the vast majority of humanity, along with the planning of expert geneticists, yes, this is possible.

> Many people appeal to evolution to justify gender roles while at the same time pretending like these gender roles are now static and unchangeable and that our present biological condition is the ultimate truth.
They are the ultimate truth for you, I, and our generations for a pretty goddamn long time. Rather than change our evolutionary behaviour, we should focus on changing societal attitudes. I did not argue in favour of gender roles in my post.

>It happened in the last one of these threads, actually.
I don't believe that something like that would go unchallenged.
(contd)

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:19 No.9665585

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:19 No.9665585

>>9665526
>Just like most people on /pol/ suggests all left-wing sources are biased and all biased sources are also left-wing (unless they complement the right-wing agenda)?
I'm not sure anyone truly believes that, except for the stupidest of /pol/iticians. Basically everyone knows that bias is everywhere and a common flaw of the species.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:20 No.9665608

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:20 No.9665608

A liberal's strawman attacks the caricature of conservative's motives.

A conservative's strawman attacks the caricature of the liberal's policies.

This is why liberals think conservatives are evil and conservatives think liberals are idiots.

Anonymous
01/28/13(Mon)15:20 No.9665610

Anonymous 01/28/13(Mon)15:20 No.9665610

>>9665545
everysingleliberalarguementever.txt