Rick Santorum is gonna win. He will pull off enough support from Bachmann, Gingrich, and Perry to get the victory.

Romney or Paul. I would be voting for Santorum

Obama... like most of the state will in November

Rick Santorum, he has the most solid support and the fastest growing support.

When does voting begin and end?

>>932554

No idea.

>Santorum
>Winning Iowa

>>932601

Paid shills. It will most definitely be Paul.

>>932542
this

Iowafag here.

>>932554
According to wiki the 2012 Iowa caucuses will take place on Tuesday, January 3, at 7 p.m. CT.

>>932614
>paid shills

lol. seeing how pauls entire campaign was internet based, that's not saying much for you.

>>932502
google "Gabriel Santorum" then report back.

>>932697

Or read
http://spreadingsantorum.com

Bump.

>>932542
>>932624
>voting Obama
hahaha so fahnny joke

>mfw this thread got stickied

Iowan here, Bachmann. I'm a democrat, I want a sure Obama win.

>Living in Iowa
>2012

If I lived in that hellhole and had to vote for one of those assholes, I'd vote for Huntsman.

>mfw there's mods here

Why do people support Santorum...seriously who here is supporting him and why?

Ron Paul won't win because of this.
http://www.breitbart.tv/republican-strategist-iowa-gop-will-not-allow-paul-to-win/

Santorum is full of himself.

romney will win

RON PAUL MOTHERFUCKERS!

>>932943

>>932967

Radical fundamentalist Christians who are supposedly "pro-life" despite supporting the death penalty.

I'm voting Paul. A vote for Paul is a vote for ending the tyranny that has dominated America for hundreds of years. He will save us all. Vote Paul.

>>932967

Because he's the last candidate in the Bachmann/Cain/Perry/Gingrich mold. People just don't want Romney to win.

nobody's winning, in the bigger picture.

>>932959
Hey mods, how you liking the new direction of /new/?

saging a sticky

>posting in a sticky

mfw none of it matters cause obama is going to win anyways.

Romney will probably win, but Paul will be a close second.

Posting in a sticky.

definitely not voting for that racisat, sexist, homophobic, corrupt, corporatist shill zog paulberg

No one. Democrat here. Bring on November.

PAUL!

>sticky

fuck you mods. fuck that. we'll be making plenty of Iowa threads anyway. disregard this bullshit. no one wants to sift through a 2000 post sticky.

>>933011

>>932828
With the exception of a surprisingly close match between Bush and dull-as-a-brick Kerry (only losing by a few thousand votes), Republicans haven't carried Iowa since Reagan v Mondale.

>>933016
Exactly.
>>932970 explains why.

Ron Paul will win and everyone will discredit Iowa. Then win again in NH and cause massive buttdevestation on the MSM and establishment.

>>933053
This.

Saging in a sticky because mods are retarded and still don't get that nobody except /b/ likes stickies because they are just huge unreadable spamfests.

>>933061
That doesn't make voting for Obama any less pants-on-head retarded.

mfw when some santorum or romney faggot wins

>>933090
>voting for the only candidate who doesn't kowtow to the teabaggers
>retarded
lolwut?

>>933066
this guy speaks truth

>mfw Ron Paul wins Iowa

>>933066
And then he will lose the general election anyway

It's a Primary, and it is a symbolic vote.

30,000,000 Blue Republicans will vote Paul in the Primaries and will never vote any other GOP candidate in the General.

Learn to live with it GOP. It's Paul or Obama, your choice.

>our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain on flag
>not voting ron paul

>that feel when this is only time people pay attention to Iowa

>>933121

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLDrn0Mwo0w
Why didn't you listen?

>Remember when Perry was polling higher than Ron Paul?

mfw if ron paul looses.

RON PAUL

>>933066
>everyone will discredit Iowa.

It will only bolster Iowa's irrelevance. It's picked 2 out of 6 previous Republic noms; it isn't a good predictor.

>>933066
Mitt Romney has new Hampshire in the bag.

(Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney appears set to win the nation's first 2012 primary vote in New Hampshire next week by a wide margin, according to two surveys released on Monday.

Romney, the former governor of neighboring Massachusetts who has a vacation estate in New Hampshire, has 43 percent support among likely primary voters in a 7 News/Suffolk University daily tracking poll, and 41 percent in a survey by the polling firm Magellan Strategies.

He has a double-digit lead over his nearest rival Texas congressman Ron Paul, who polled at 21 percent in the Magellan Strategies survey and 17 percent in the 7 News/Suffolk University survey.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/02/us-usa-campaign-newhampshire-polls-idUSTRE8010U520120102

Ron Paul is the only candidate drawing support from democrats and independents, who are allowed to vote in Iowa's primary. Ron Paul will win.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCQdbrCTezw

>>933178
>fringe candidate
>winning

Nope.

ron stucking in a /pol/sty

>>933144
Remember when Perry, Cain, Santorum, Bachmann, Romney and Gingrich were polling higher than Paul?

I'd be laughing to tears if this clusterfuck weren't so dangerous.

Iowa will be oozing with santorum fever.

Its seems that IN Iowa the one candidate that pique the most interest in terms of google search is Ron Paul by a fucking landslide.

http://www.google.com/trends?q=Ron+paul%2C+Mitt+Romney%2C+Rick+Santorum%2C+Newt+Gingrich&ctab=0&
amp;geo=us&geor=usa.ia&date=ytd&sort=0

He really seem to harness a fucking lot more attention than all of the other candidates and more consistently.

Also Rick Santorum didn't surge until the publication of the CNN poll last week. I mean nothing before that would have suggested that he gained the Iowans attention.

Play with google trends. He is really popular in Iowans cities.

But since the media announce the winners, heck I wouldn't be surprised if they announce a winners that goes against the trends. Something clearly fucking miraculous because if I had this data and I was an Investor I would invest in Ron Paul because it really seems to be selling well. But this is politics, so popularity index aren't worth a shit if the results are announced by an agency that has a bias against popular candidates.

>>933174


http://www.thestatecolumn.com/iowa/ron-paul-wins-iowa-ppp-poll-but-gives-up-ground-to-rick-santorum/

>Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, won another Public Policy Polling poll of likely Iowa Republican caucusgoers with 20 percent of the votes Monday. However, Mr. Paul gave up a considerable amount of ground to former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, who garnered 18 percent of the votes to finish in third place. Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, who won an Insider Advantage poll Monday, grabbed second place with 19 percent of the votes.

>people thinking santorum will win

>>933174

If paul wins iowa, it will open some eyes and pique some curiosity in NH. plus...

>Ruters

If Ron Paul wins I will cry. I really will. It would be like a fucking fantasy dream

>Mfw i watch America fuck itself because it was too stupid and easily fooled to vote for the one guy who would save them, Ron /pol/ and instead gives it to Romney or worse, Gingrich.

It was good run.
Good thing I'm not American or in America, otherwise they'd throw me in the slammer for looking like a terrorist.

>>933204
Take a dose of Ron Paul and call me in the morning.

>>932478
Romney will win. I'm voting Romney in the Primary (if it's even necessary by then) and for the General (although Obama will take Massachusetts) as well. Romney forever and ever. :)

FINAL VOTE TALLY

PAUL 31%
SANTARUM 24%
ROMNEY 23%
PERRY 11%
GINGRINCH 5%
BACKMAN 4%
HUNSTMAN 1%

>>933277

>>933277

AHAHAHAHA WHAT A FAGGOT

Dr. Paul

>>933277

>>933277

Kill yourself.

>>933250

>Good thing I'm not American or in America, otherwise they'd take me on a helicopter ride 50 miles out into the ocean and then dump me.

Fix'd

if ron paul smiled and joked around more, and used different terms to describe the same things(he says "welfare state" and "policemen of the world" a lot) people would be 50 times more receptive to his views

New ACLU Report Card Puts Ron Paul Above President Obama

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrAXfIdRqmU

>>933277
>Romney forever and ever. :)

You stupid fucking aspies know Mike Huckabee won the Iowa Caucus in 2008, right?

This is just so fucking sad and hilarious. Ron Paul doesn't have a chance. The elite won't let him.


If you kids think they can be overthrown, you are fucking retarded.

Grow up and accept the reality. You have two corporately owned scumbags, just representing different cultures. Obama or Romney. Accept your place in this system.

>>933233
Do you see what is happening, its all a fucking lie.

They need the magical Rick Santorum last minute surge to make Paul lose to Romney. I seriously believe that a Ron Paul voter ain't no last minute turncoat. They can't let Romney gain more than what he constantly pulled on polls. They can't lower too much what Paul pulled. So they need a 3rd candidate to transfer just enough of the winning margin of Paul to make Romney win by a slight margin. This is some fucking mainstream media election theft bullshit. If you Iowans don't watch the vote and don't show the internet and world what truly happens tomorrow, the media will broadcast a lie to the entire world.

>>932478

>pinning paul thread

excellent choice mods

>>933315

obviously homosex,

he does look cute to be honest

RON PAUL HAS IT ON LOCK DOWN.

DEAL WITH IT.

WE IOWA NOW!

>santorum
>one of the most corrupt politicians in the u
http://www.citizensforethics.org/index.php/press/entry/crew-releases-second-annual-most-corrupt-memb
ers-of-congress-report/

I know the Santorum supporters are trolls. Wait until your average voter gets a whiff of this.

>Karen Santorum wrote a book about the experience: Letters to Gabriel: The True Story of Gabriel Michael Santorum.[125] In it, she writes that the couple brought the deceased infant home from the hospital and presented the dead child to their living children as "your brother Gabriel" and slept with the body overnight before returning it to the hospital.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Santorum

>>932478
Sigh, why did this get stickied.

How many people in Iowa have already early voted?

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/ron-paul-greeted-overflow-crowd-first-day-back-202342300.html

>>933324

>If you kids think they can be overthrown, you are fucking retarded
>The elite won't let him

>encourages people to vote obama or romney in the same post

that's real subtle anon

Posting in a sticky, just because I can.

Also, symbolic sage, since I'm not contributing.

>>933324

Keep fearing the people! We shall take back the United States!

i come from the future paul is gonna win and his Ipopularity is gonna surge after this. I can only say after pauls presidency that the media and American society will be much different and America will be a more free place.

I am breaking regulation by posting this but its worth it. You are witnessing history and the next golden age of America.

TRENDING: Ron Paul: Santorum is 'very liberal'

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/02/ron-paul-santorum-is-very-liberal/

>(CNN) - Ron Paul dinged rival Rick Santorum Monday for being a "very liberal" candidate, saying the former Pennsylvania senator and staunch social conservative voted for too much spending during his time in Congress.

>Speaking to CNN Senior Congressional Correspondent Dana Bash before a campaign event with his son, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, the White House hopeful said his rival had taken positions counter to true conservative ideas.

>"I mean, have you looked at his record? Go look at his record," Paul said.

>He continued: "He spends too much money. He wasn't leading the charge to slash the budgets and vote against big government."

>>933355
My picture didn't load.

>my face if Paul loses tomorrow

>>933387
These pictures crack me up.

Iowans for Donald Trump

>>933374

There you have it, folks. Ron Paul 2012.

rick perry is on fox news right now spouting the same bullshit about how ron paul wants iran to have a nuke and how iran has literally said that "they will wipe israel off the face of the map and we are next"

if america is the number one country of all times why are these faggots so afraid that iran will FedEx a doomsday device to the door step of every red-blooded american and little brown baby in the country?

>santorum
>2012
"All of us have heard people say, 'I privately am against abortion, homosexual marriage, stem cell research, cloning. But who am I to decide that it's not right for somebody else?' It sounds good, but it is the corruption of freedom of conscience."


"From economic issues focusing on the poor and social justice, to issues of human life, George Bush is there. He has every right to say, 'I’m where you are if you're a believing Catholic.'"

So do we find out the results tomorrow night, or...?

>yfw Occupy protesters disrupt the caucuses and the media uses that to overshadow Paul's victory

>Implying the Election won't be rigged after it's been moved to an undisclosed location
>Implying Mit Zogney won't win because of tampering.
>Mfw btw

>>933416
>mfw when we will just counter and claim the occupiers have been officially high jacked by the US government and are being used a proxy to control the voting process

>>933405
We find out the result when the media decide the winners.

>>933428
Yeah, which will probably be towards the evening.

I have a feeling Romney will win but only by 1-2%. No way Paul will win NH or Florida, sorry Paulfriends.

>>933425

>mitt zogney

beware anons, the zionists know about the growing awareness of people
and are probably using it

>>933445

I live in Florida and have convinced my whole family to vote for Ron Paul. Hopefully others do the same.

>hey guys the system is bloated, corrupt and extremely powerful

Yes, it is.

>they are corporate owned scumbags, who dont represent the will of America anymore

Definately.

>thats why you shouldnt do anything at all to even try and stop it and just tell yourself it's hopeless and nothing can change

How utterly craven and cowardly, I'd pity you except for the fact you want everybody to suck like you do and be taken down to your level of subservience.

>>933315
>>933305
>>933302
>>933293
>>933287
I voted for George Bush in 2004. I'd vote for him now, if he decided to run. In fact, I would have said fuck the constitution and voted for him in 2008. That's how awesome GW is. I don't understand the hatred for him and it reeks of retarded left bullshit. Obama was a joke. Once he got in office and got read in as to all the covert ops and secret programs the government is all up in he STUCK WITH THE FUCKING PLAN. GW laid out this century to the best of his office's ability considering 9/11. Obama has followed GWB's foreign policy, specifically on hard power, vigorously. There's a reason for that. That reason is that George W. Bush is the greatest president of the last 50 years. Fuck the haters.

>>933345

Strange, I haven't heard a single mention in the media that Rick Santorum sleeps with dead infants.

Yeah people should probably know that.

>>933496
He was cute too!

>>933496

wut

>>933496
I really like Bill Clinton as well, for the record. He's 2nd best.

>>933514
>"george bush" circa 1970s
>not rocking the unibrow

sure....

>>933524
habeeb it

>>933514
I really liked that he was funny and laid back but super serious when needed. I almost shed a tear when he was visiting NYC after 9/11, gave that speech on top of the fire truck with a bullhorn, or whatever vehicle. I guess you'd have to have been an adult when it happened. If you were a kid maybe you missed it.

>>933496
So if Obama just did what Bush did, why don't you like him?

REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT
REMEMBER ITS RON PAUL
OR ZOG FOR PRESIDENT

www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Hvuru-Slls&feature=g-all-f&context=G2805690FAAAAAAAAEAA

>>933542

He probably would've been made fun of A LOT if there wasn't such hatred towards him. I mean, you don't remember Will Ferrel's Bush like you remember Darrel Hammond's Clinton or Dana Carvey's HW Bush.

>A THOUSAND POINTS OF LIGHT

Let's see who would win if /pol/ were voting

>http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1242007-which-republican-candidate-do-you-want-to-win-the-primarie
s

>>933590
>He probably would've been made fun of A LOT if there wasn't such hatred towards him

Elaborate please. Or just clarify.

Recently I spent too much money this holiday season, I went out to eat, the movies a couple times, decided to treat myself. After I paid my bills I realized I would be broke until my next paycheck. Living paycheck to paycheck because I decided to live above my means.

That is how America is today. We are living way above our means. We are spending beyond what we can afford to pay off. When will we pay off this debt? 10% of our budget goes to JUST PAYING INTEREST on the debt we have accrued. That last major bubble? It was a housing bubble due to people not being able to pay their loans. I am sure there were many cases linked to people living above their means.

Like the hosing bubble, America will one day cross that threshold, and with the world market looking increasingly shaky, with the prospect of a new conflict with Iran growing, it seems almost inevitable.

But we can change that. We can change that tomorrow, and the next months ahead.

>>933514
Who is this guy?

Was he part of the Rove/Cheney administration?

>>933405

Prolly have to wait till Wed.

>>933641
>
Recently I spent too much money this holiday season, I went out to eat, the movies a couple times, decided to treat myself. After I paid my bills I realized I would be broke until my next paycheck. Living paycheck to paycheck because I decided to live above my means.
Learn to savings account.

>>933612

>michele bauckmann

>>933627

I think making fun of presidents was a little more benign before Bush Jr came around. I think people hated him so much that they didn't even think it was worth there time to even mention he was the president. At least, that's what it felt like to me.

Those were angry times, but some of shit he did that was funny could've been even funnier if someone like Will Ferrel did an impression of him dancing with the black drum tribes.

>>933612
>>933612
>>933612
>>933612
RON PAUL 2012

THE END OF THE WORLD IS UPON US

THE END OF THIS WORLD OF SUFFERING

>>933655
I'm sorry.

It wasn't supposed to happen.

>>933641
>implying Paul isn't part of the problem by getting tens of millions of federal dollars for his district

>>933546
I like his foreign policy, even his "lead from behind" bullshit in Libya. I think he should have taken more credit, especially because of the LARGE amount of munition and treasure spent by the US during the operation, via NATO. I hate hate hate his domestic policies and attitude. He's not manning the fuck up with the congress .America HATES the fucking congress, and he can't take advantage of it? He should bullying the FUCK out of those idiots. Especially the joke of a House. I don't even like his policies, but if he would AT LEAST put up a fight for his beliefs... I'd respect him. I said I liked Clinton. I don't have to agree with all of your ideas and policies to like you as a President. It truly is a hard job, after all.

>>933684
Where else should taxpayers money go?

Ron Paul is NOT going to win.

>>933662
I think good nature comedy was needed with GW, like Slick Willy got treated. Nahimean?

>>933694
>that feel when I have the sudden urge to play that shitty game

>>933693
TO PAY FOR PEOPLES FOOD STAMPS OF COURSE.

>>933693
Paying off our debt.

requesting picture of santorumus fetus

>>933684

He has justly defended his actions countless times, you're retarded.

>>933710
I actually agree with this

>>933711
>has no idea where the money comes from, lol

Australian here.

What the fuck is a caucus?
What happens if Ron wins?
Why are the media and companies ron paul is fighting for in terms of economic freedom (deregulation and all that jazz) against him?

>>933730
> Why are the media and companies ron paul is fighting for in terms of economic freedom (deregulation and all that jazz) against him?

You obviously don't know anything about economics either.

>>933684

10's of millions =/= 17 trillion

HERP DERP DERP IM A HURRSE!

>>933684

>Giving his district back tax money
>Wants congress to manage the money, not the executive branch to spend in secrecy.

Are you guys still on about the earmarks?

>>933747
Why so hurtful broski

Iowa, what a joke

First Bachmann, then Perry, then Cain, the Gingrich, and now Santorum

>>933714
What's just about getting 60 million dollars in one year? What's just about quadrupling your porkbarel spending to about 4 billion within a few years? What's just about being one of the only republicans who doesn't sign a voluntary earmarks ban? You have to be a fucking deluded cult member if you don't think Ron Paul is like every other politician on the playing field.

>>933612
rick perry out of fucking nowhere

>>933782

>Every other politician in the field
>Every other politician
>Every politician
>Every

May I ask how he benefits from the earmarks? In case you have not noticed he is giving his district back tax money.

>>933782
Taxpayers money going back to the taxpayers in the form of earmarks is corruption?

>>933808
/pol/ really IS filled with white supremists after all.

>New Ron Paul slogan
Ron Paul

Because he's crazy. But not as crazy as those other motherfuckers.

>>933768
If he advocates congress managing the money, then why did he vote against monitoring the TARP bailouts?
>>933813
When other politicians create special projects, it's unnecessary spending. When Ron Paul does it, he's just getting them their money back. Gotcha.

Here's one more question: if he's just getting the taxpayer's money back, why does he vote against the bills?

>>933812
>>933813
Not the one you're responding to, but it's fair to criticize Paul for this because he regularly slams others for doing exactly the same thing. If he really wants to end the vicious cycle then he should stay out of it completely.

>be pro-life
>support massive war
>america

stay classy

>>933712

you don't want to see it, trust me

>>933887
Nope

Majority of American support abortion, along with death penalty. We love death.

Where can I check the results?

http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1242007-which-republican-candidate-do-you-want-to-win-the-primaries

>Rick Perry first in poll
>/pol/ trolling the poll

>>933730
Fellow Ausfailian here.

>What the fuck is a caucus?

It's where supporters of a political party or something else of the like all get together and decide what to do. Though the meanings can vary across America.

>What happens if Ron wins?

To us as Non-Americans?
There's less American interest getting pushed on the rest of the world, people who know bugger all will tell you that means China will invade and the Nazis will return and Cthulhu will arise from the sea.

As for Americans they'll have less of their rights being taken off them, though on the downside that means you'll see more of them on the internet.

>Why are the media and companies ron paul is fighting for in terms of economic freedom (deregulation and all that jazz) against him?

The Saudi Royal Family is the second largest shareholder in Newscorp.

Newscorp owns Fox news.

Saudis are not comfortable with Ron Paul saying that Americans are more entitled to their money than Saudis.

>>933812
He's getting his cake and eating it too. He stuffs his bills with pork then votes against them, knowing they'll pass. He pleases both the people who love federal spending and "small-government conservatives" and gets elected again only to get the 150,000 dollar paycheck and a government paid healthcare plan. That's why he's been a 10 term congressman that "advocates term limits".

>>933882
Exactly. The only excuse he has is "lol everyone else is doing it".

>>933973
Ron Paul 2012.
>Implying you are willing to give all the other candidates the same criticism
>Implying you know the mind of Ron Paul.
>Implying you made citations...wait no you didn't.

Romney will win, Paul will be fucked out of victory by GOP fucking with the vote count, Paul will be mad, Paul will run as a 3rd party, Paul will win, apocalypse will begin as a third party candidate wins the presidential election.

Mayans know their shit.

>taking Rick Perry seriously

Yeah, full of trolls. What do you expect from conspiracy theorists?

The sad part is that due to desensitization from the internet, I wouldn't be surprised if Iowans voted for a terrible candidate to troll the Paultards. What a sad country.

Doom Paul thread?

Iowan here: Ron Paul has a huge following here. He's almost definitely going to win the caucus

>>933996

>I wouldn't be surprised if Iowans voted for a terrible candidate to troll the Paultards

No. Iowans are not 4chan. They do not "troll" each other for shits and giggles like you immoral bastards do.

>>932957
"Iowa picks corn. New Hampshire picks presidents." - Huntsman.

You'd probably be the only one in the whole state.

>>934019
You better vote for him

>>934019
that's great paulbot. that's what every naive college student says about their politician of choice.

>>934019
Can you show proof? That you are from Iowa?

>>934035

>implying college students vote for anyone other than Paul

>>934038

Why the hell would he feel the need to prove that to you? If I questioned your place of residence, would you show to me identification?

>>934024
>people don't troll in real lyfe lool

>>934040
>implying your implications mean anything on 4chan

>>934049
Maybe.

>>933882
>>933878
those budgets are voted on. ron paul always votes against the budget because it is inflated. if everyone voted like ron paul, those unnecessary funds wouldn't get spent.

keep voting goyim

http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1242007-which-republican-candidate-do-you-want-to-win-the-primaries

It's hard to believe there are still Obama supporters on 4chan. The place of anonymity and freedom on the internet.

Obama has murdered American citizens without trial. Anyone who supports him is making themselves personally responsible for the murders he carries out in their name. Romney, Gingrich, and the other Republican sleezeballs are no different.

Don't like Ron Paul? Write in Dennis Kucinich. Vote John Huntsman. Whatever. But Ron Paul actually has a chance. I'm going to vote for Paul in November if he wins. I don't want to see government burned to the ground like Paul does, but I think Paul would do more good in his first day than Obama has done in 4 years (Obama has done no good and lots of evil, actually). Obama will never pardon Bradley Manning and apologize to Wikileaks. Obama will never pardon non-violent drug offenders. Ron Paul will. Everything Paul will have the power to do as president, he is superior to Obama on. Stop being tools who vote for president based on things the president doesn't even control. If Dems want the liberal vote, they should start choosing liberal presidents who don't murder and pillage across the globe, who restore our rights and doesn't give money to plutocrats.

Anybody but Evil 2012.

>>933987
I really don't have to. Romney is a career politician, Gingrich is a flip-flopper, Perry is an idiot, Bachmann is a war monger and Santorum is a bible thumper. Huntsman is the only non-dickhead in the race. What do you have against him? Some video where he introduces Sarah Palin? A hypothetical question about Iran? The fact of the matter is he's the only candidate with an ACTUAL conservative record. He can lead both in the business and in state. Not to mention he can play a mean organ. Gary Johnson is scholar-tier too, but he won't get enough support as the LP candidate.

>>933958
it's not wise to plagiarize...

>>934109
Who is this?

I see this photo posted on /pol/ always in the context of Obama and murder, but I have no idea who he is.

It's time, Iowa

>>934086
That didn't explain why he ADDS millions to the legislation.

Oh Faux, you so craaaaaaaazy!

>>934134

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/the_killing_of_awlakis_16_year_old_son/

>>934148

Is that shit real?

>>934148
Allow me to one up you.

>>934138
because it's his job as a congressman to represent the needs of his people by placing earmarks for things they need, but not to approve of an imbalanced budget. he is very consistent in his duties as a congressman. and if the bills happen to pass, then that is good. if they don't, then it's no big deal.

I cannot believe you would vote in Ron Paul, the man has no history in business. Look at Obama, the entire financial sector is behind him. He has employed many ex-employees from the major banks and corporations, he has the best advice.

>>934134
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2097899,00.html

American born Addul Rahman, 16 year old son of Anwar al-awalki who was also assasinated for speech crimesthey died by drone attack.

>>934177
+1

earmarks are applying money that is already budgeted to be spent. he is earmarking the money back to the district from which it was stolen.

man some of yall are dumb

here get a clue if John McCain is against it, you know its a good thing. Same thing, if Ron Paul is for it, you should probably research the reason as to why.

>>934190
stop.

I pinned this thread to the top of /pol/

why didn't you use a paul pic?

>>934177
How can you excuse his hypocrisy? I'll repeat this again: HE IS ONE OF THE ONLY REPUBLICANS IN THE HOUSE THAT DIDN'T SIGN A VOLUNTARY PORKBARREL BAN. HE, ALONG WITH THE DEMOCRATS, ARE THE ONES KEEPING THIS SYSTEM UP. NOW HE'S TRYING TO MUDSLING AT SANTORUM FOR DOING THE SAME MOTHERFUCKING THING HE'S DOING. EXCEPT SANTORUM DIDN'T PRETEND TO BE AGAINST THE PORKBARREL SPENDING BECAUSE HE'S NOT A FUCKING WEASEL DIAPER-WEARING PRICK LIKE PAUL.

>>934190
>Ron Paul, the man has no history in business

Self-employed successful physician.

Getting desperate for slander, GOP shills?

>>934259
thanks to mommy and daddy

I'm an Iowan and I'm voting for Ron Paul.

Saging a sticky.

>>934255

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWTyHbGcUQY

>>934316

it's pronounced "sah-gay"

>>934318
Aw shit lol,
>>934255
owned.

>>934259
>>934275

They ARE desperate!

>>934255

Yes, but Santorum sleeps with dead infants. We've already established that, and that fact makes him unelectable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrAXfIdRqmU

ACLU Report Card Puts Ron Paul Above President Obama.

down voted

>>934398
ACLU put my dick above ur mother.

YUou give patriots a bad name.

MFW: Ron Paul makes a disappointing showing in Iowa because of the armchair Ron Paul supporters who post in forums all day but won't be bothered to actually go out and actually vote.

>>934386
This.

Listen to this. Santorum will NEVER be president. He has already been classified mentally retarded by the association on mental health and therefore is already disqualified.

of course no MAINSTREAM historian will admit to this because it was removed from the constitution in 1996.

>>934318
>>934328
He just repeated everything you've all been saying. He's already proven he's bullshitting about the "congress should monitor it" crap because he voted against monitoring the tarp bailout funds. And the social security excuse? I guess by his logic I should be encouraged to quit my job and go on unemployment.


Here's a facepalm collage to signify your failure to excuse his porkish ways.

>>934431

stay in denial, moron.

>>934437
Somebody's mad Ron Paul is part of the problem.

>>934454
Your mother is a nigger

>>934454

You're one of those people that can't be argued with. No matter how wrong you are you continue to spew shit.

>>934430
>it was removed from the constitution in 1996.

The part about not having a retarded POTUS or the part about the POTUS should not sleep with dead infants?

>>934454
$8/hr GOP shill.

Are you going to back to sucking cocks at the bus station when your current gig is over?

He's catching up!

http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1242007-which-republican-candidate-do-you-want-to-win-the-primaries

>yfw 4chan goes down at 7pm tomorrow

>>934495

Dat sample size.

>>934500
>inb4 autistic /pol/ kike shitstorm

>>934148

You do know that was a typo right?

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/12/paul-pulling-closer-to-gingrich-in-iowa.html

Here is the poll straight from the Public Policy Polling Website.

Ron Paul actually had 21% of the vote, while Gingrich had 22% of the vote.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqZaQKskP-A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqZaQKskP-A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqZaQKskP-A

found this old gem of Bachmann. enjoy

>>934462
>Ron Paul unnecessarily adds porkbarrel to his spending
>pretends to be against it
>gets the 60 million and the "conservative record"
>gets re-elected
>tries calling out other candidates for "unnecessary spending"
>rinse and repeat

You are the idiots that are wrong. What's hard to understand that a county with less than 300 thousand people shouldn't get 60 million in added projects especially when we have a deficit we have to pay off?

>>934495

Seriously, where did all those Rick Perry votes come from? I remember Paul was at like 5 votes a while ago, I refresh, then bam, Rick has fucking 29 votes.

Saging and reporting this thread for paultard spam

So when do we know who won?

>vote for Paul in 08 primaries
>check out the district results in the local newspaper
>Paul: 0

>>934495
>No votes for Santorum

All is as it should be.

>>934551
>added
And that's the problem we're trying to tell you. It's not adding anything. The money is already budgeted either the congress decides where it goes or the President does. Putting no earmarks in doesn't save a penny.

>>934563
Isthisniggaserious.jpg

>>934563
>saging a sticky

>>934554
I'm a) not american b) not an RP supporter but I am vote botting this poll.

Paul is probably going to lose irl.

>>934598
Why don't you try making Paul get the exact result of 66.6% in the poll. That would be funnier.

>that feel when paul is literally the only nominee with even a slight chance to beat obama

>>934551

>Ron Paul unnecessarily adds porkbarrel to his spending

are you refusing to listen to his position on this issue or something? holy fucking christ you are retarded.

>>934529
>typo

Of course it was sweetheart. The MSM couldn't be colluding, that would be untowards.

>>934584
Basically the system is broken so the answer is to keep it going. Why is it the Republicans in the House don't rally together to MAKE Obama use the money to pay off the deficit? It's easy to say the system is broken. It's another thing to actually accomplish something, which Paul is also foreign to.

>>934632
>porkbarrel
My favorite word

>>934563
>Saging and reporting this thread

>Saging a sticky
>reporting to the mod that stickied it

Oh the lulz you newfriends provide!

>>934668
>2012
>feeding trolls

>>934190
I'M LAUGHING SO FUCKING HARD AT THIS POST!

>>934652
>Why is it the Republicans in the House don't rally together to MAKE Obama use the money to pay off the deficit?

Did you forget the whole debt ceiling thing a while ago?

>>934677
>>934668
>implying "you" aren't just the samefag thats been in here bumping this shitty thread from the very start.

/b/tard /diy/ke here. My first time in /pol/ and I'm posting in a soggy bread.

>>what do you guys call yourselves?

>>934644

you paultards and your conspiracy theories...

>>934699
Reported for pagan witch craft. Typical forest spook, I'd expect no less from your kind.

>>934695
/pol/estinians

>>934695
That picture is fully retarded. To quote Yes Minister:

>"You can either have openness, or you can have government."

>>934695
>naming yourself like that
You didn't even need to call yourself a /b/tard, it was obvious.

>>934551

60 million is nothing nowadays

>mfw

>>934709
why do you hate your country?

Ummmm... what?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/02/us-usa-campaign-idUSTRE7BT14220120102

>>934712
how Politically Incorrect

>>934712
>not ron /pol/

>>934695
/pol/aks

>>934735
>thinking everyone here likes that welfare queen

>>934461
I was reading this whole civil thread and your comment struck me in poor taste yet I laughed. Oh did I laugh.

>>934551
>Ron Paul unnecessarily adds porkbarrel to his spending

you are missing the point that its pork money that already existed, not something he added, followed by voting it down because its pork

>>934743
>implying everyone doesn't
>implying everyone doesn't talk about him 24/7 regardless

Sagin' a sticky.

>>934766
>you will never live near an in-and-out

>>934738
>>934695
>>934255
>>934190
>>934157
>>934109
>>933641
Most important posts

2012 voting for obama ishygddt

My prediction:

>Ron Paul gets 29%
>Santorum gets 19%
>Gingrich 17%
>Romney 16%

All of the media attention goes to Santorum and his surprising lead over Gingrich and Romney.

>>934763
>thinking a bunch of aspies who know nothing about politics other than what mises,org tells them is a good representation of an entire site.

>>934695
assholes

>>934788

>>934788

>Gingrich beating Romney
>Much lower in the polls than Romney

No.

>>934799
>implying that isn't as good a representation as you can get

>>934801
But that's a good thing dumbass...

LET'S
DO
THIS
SHIT

I'm voting for Obama.

>>934834
>people who are too stupid to get real jobs support ron paul

your point

>>934856
see
>>934801
>>934801

>>934801
Holy FUCK, I seriously thought the rednecks were overly paranoid. That is seriously fucked up.

Iowan here, voting Obama. Also, we should get rid of this fucking retarded caucus bullshit, it doesn't work and isn't really democratic.

>>>>SAGING A STICKY, DEAL WITH IT<<<<
>>>>SAGING A STICKY, DEAL WITH IT<<<<
>>>>SAGING A STICKY, DEAL WITH IT<<<<
>>>>SAGING A STICKY, DEAL WITH IT<<<<
>>>>SAGING A STICKY, DEAL WITH IT<<<<

>>934872
obama just signed the ndaa into law destroying your right to trial, nullifing the bill of rights. hes fucking scum and a traitor to america

>>934870
But that's a good thing.

>>934894
>killed bin laden

YOU HAD A CHOICE.
THIS IS YOUR LAST CHANCE.

>>934872
You've never been to the South, have you?

>>934801
what is the point of concealed carry? if you have a gun for self defence isn't it better to carry it openly so people know not to fuck with you?

the only reason you would need to conceal it is if you're up to no good

>mfw Paul wins

>>934924
>implying the government can do anything about taxation
You clearly have no idea what the fuck you are on about.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYD46Q0a3Qo

THEY'LL WAGE THIS WAR IN YOUR NAME.
VOTE FOR RON PAUL OR ELSE IT'S OVER.

>>934902
no it isn't, when the people don't have guns they have no way to fight if the government oversteps their bounds. if the government starts taking guns it means they are afraid of revolt

>>934935
go away strawman

>>934935

>carry openly
>criminals know who to shoot first

>>934935
It gives the benefit of the doubt to anyone fucking with anyone. Without concealed carry, if it's not visible you don't have it (legally speaking).

>>934933

just... fucking... Wow

Santorum

>>934941
The fuck am I reading

>>934933
>BOMB MECCA

FUCK YEAH!

>>934967
so criminals aren't going to be jumpy and shoot some guy who was reaching for his wallet, since they know he doesn't have a gun

>>934933

>disabled veteran plate

The butthurt just oozes from that pic.

>>935011
The fuck are you even trying to say? It's better to have one in a bad situation than to not, period.

>>934944
10/10

>>934944
>That flashed image

>>934933
>redneck
>likely christian
>"thousands of years of evolution and the only thing muslim arabs.."
>most pornographic violent disgusting book is the quran

>>935028

This.

>>935028
I don't see how that related to what I'm saying... I never said having a gun was a bad thing...

I'm saying it's better not to get into a bad situation by carrying your gun openly as a deterrent

>>934944
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYD46Q0a3Qo

God damnit /pol/, you've made this entirely fucked up and serious scenario hilarious to me now.

>>935055
>implying Christians can't believe in evolution as well
hurr durr

>>935066
I think that entirely depends on the circumstances.

>>934732
YOU FORGOT
>VOTED YES FOR THE AUTHORIZATION TO USE MILITARY FORCE AGAINST TERRORISTS, WHICH HAS KEPT US IN AFGHANISTAN TO THIS VERY DAY, WHICH GAVE OBAMA THE AUTHORIZATION TO KILL AL-AWLAKI AND OTHERS

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/107/house/1/votes/342/

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/107/house/1/votes/342/

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/107/house/1/votes/342/

>>935082
>an entire race of people who don't even believe in gravity believing in evolution

Man you're funny

>>935073
>mfw YOU MANIACS, YOU BLEW IT UP

>>935085
well I'm talking about self defence, but if you're looking for trouble then I can see why a concealed gun would be better

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16388354

Six Republican presidential candidates are preparing for the first official test of the US election season in the rural state of Iowa.

The hopefuls toured Iowa on Monday, the last full day of campaigning before the Hawkeye State's caucuses.

Mitt Romney, Ron Paul and Rick Santorum lead the polls ahead of Tuesday's vote, but the race remains unpredictable.

Tuesday evening's caucuses will involve about 120,000 Iowans gathering in homes, schools and public buildings.

Iowa's ballot is the first contest to pick the Republican who will challenge Barack Obama for the White House.

Spread across some 1,700 meetings in all of Iowa's 99 counties, the meetings see Iowans elect 28 delegates to the Republican National Convention, to be held in Florida in August.

>>935116
I'm saying for some low level thugs it would likely work well as deterrence, where as tough guy thugs would see it as a challenge. Like I said, it depends.

RON PAUL
RON PAUL
RON PAUL

DON PAUL
DON PAUL
DON PAUL
DON PAUL

>>935091
He specifically said he voted to capture Bin Laden, he voted against the Iraq war and disagreed with the withdrawal timetable.

>>935182

don't bother giving that cunt more attention. he knows he's being dishonest with his arguments. it's the liberal way.

The Texas vote tally for the National Defense Appropropriations Bill vote:

Aye TX-1 Gohmert, Louis [R]
Aye TX-2 Poe, Ted [R]
Aye TX-3 Johnson, Samuel [R]
Aye TX-4 Hall, Ralph [R]
Aye TX-5 Hensarling, Jeb [R]
Aye TX-6 Barton, Joe [R]
Aye TX-7 Culberson, John [R]
Aye TX-8 Brady, Kevin [R]
Aye TX-9 Green, Al [D]
Aye TX-10 McCaul, Michael [R]
Aye TX-11 Conaway, K. [R]
Aye TX-12 Granger, Kay [R]
Aye TX-13 Thornberry, William [R]
No TX-14 Paul, Ronald [R]
Aye TX-15 Hinojosa, Rubén [D]
Aye TX-16 Reyes, Silvestre [D]
Aye TX-17 Flores, Bill [R]
Aye TX-18 Jackson-Lee, Sheila [D]
Aye TX-19 Neugebauer, Randy [R]
Aye TX-20 Gonzalez, Charles [D]
Aye TX-21 Smith, Lamar [R]
Aye TX-22 Olson, Pete [R]
Aye TX-23 Canseco, Francisco [R]
Aye TX-24 Marchant, Kenny [R]
Aye TX-25 Doggett, Lloyd [D]
Aye TX-26 Burgess, Michael [R]
Aye TX-27 Farenthold, Blake [R]
Aye TX-28 Cuellar, Henry [D]
Aye TX-29 Green, Raymond [D]
Aye TX-30 Johnson, Eddie [D]
Aye TX-31 Carter, John [R]
Aye TX-32 Sessions, Peter [R]

Face the facts and prepare to pack it in shills.

Ron Paul will win. Santorum "surge" was only fluke in sampling after CNN poll maybe gained some left over Gingrich/Bachman supporters at best don't believe the hype.

>>934732
>mfw paultards believe all of this is true

I want to go to Mars now please.

>>935221
Well you certainly convinced me.
Thanks for posting all those facts, and sources to your now entirely true and credible claims.

Now I will vote for Bachmann, How could I have been so blind!

>>934836
lol, someone actually finished that photo and made it into a gif. i think i requested that picture to be made recently.

>>934933
Looks like someone learned how to print bumper stickers the went off their meds shortly after.

His muddled mind must be thinking over and over "Santorum? Gingrich? Bachmann? Santorum?..."

>>935248
he doesn't care.

at least he has choices!

>>934933
Oh my god the one about the Koran being a pornographic book, I think my head exploded.

The curious thing is how many "people" are against Paul, yet they don't rise to defend their GOP candidate of choice.

Almost like there is a concerted effort to defame Paul in exchange for _anyone_ else in the GOP Primaries to be elected.

Collusion is indeed untoward and less than gentlemen-like behavior.

>>934094
PERRY MAKIN' A COMEBACK

PERRY 2012

RICK PERRY IS OUR SAVIOR

PERRY PERRY HE'S OUR MAN

IF HE CAN'T 2012

OBAMA CAN!!

>>934933

That guy is more Perry/Santorum/Bachmann territory mental-wise than Paul/Romney

>>935199
I'm not being dishonest, and why are you paulbots so afraid of questioning your candidate? you guys are starting to sound like a cult, like the scientologists/followers of L. Ron Hubbard. Never question the messiah,

"do as I say, not as I do"

>"No tats," another volunteer, Rocco Lucente, said as he ticked off the rules after arriving at the airport Tuesday night. No liquor, no drugs and, he said, no "fraternizing in the dorms, nothing like that."

>He said the standard expected of volunteers was: "What would Ron Paul do?"

>What would Ron Paul do

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/us/politics/ron-pauls-young-iowa-volunteers-clean-up-for-the-cause
.html?_r=2&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1325140053-H55X/PhSml9bbkepOFOAbw

stay zombie, paulbot

>This race.

Santorum Haunted by Support of Pro-abortion Specter

http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/Santorum-Haunted-Pro-abortion-Specter/2011/12/31/id/422684

Rick Santorum's endorsement of Arlen Specter, a strong supporter of abortion who gave President Barack Obama the key Senate vote to pass Obamacare, is becoming a key issue as the Iowa caucuses near.

Polls show that Santorum is seeing a last-minute surge in Iowa, but pro-lifers and pro-Christian groups are seeing red.

According to press reports, critics of Santorum have been handing out fliers and putting them on cars outside of Santorum events claiming that the former Pennsylvania senator is a "Pro-Life Fraud." The organization publishing the fliers identifies itself as "Iowans for Life."

A devout Catholic, Santorum has been a consistent advocate for pro-life issues, but he backed pro-abortion candidates in key political moves that could have benefited his own career.

The pro-life flier notes that Santorum has "a long and storied history of campaigning for radical pro-abortion candidates,” mentioning Santorum's strong endorsement for former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman and former fellow Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter.

Santorum seems most haunted by his 2004 decision to back the pro-abortion Specter in a Republican primary. Specter won narrowly, defeating his pro-life opponent Pat Toomey, and Santorum's support of Specter was cited as a key help to the liberal Specter.

>>934801
Why dear god WHY is the LAST ONE a bad thing?
And I'm against concealed carry. If you've got a gun I WANT TO FUCKING SEE IT SO I CAN STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM YOU.

>>935277
He should really find some better porn.

>>934933
>mfw disabled person license plate

>>Even if you win the Special Olympics.....

>>934995
So you have no idea what your taxes actually pay for?

Fucking brainwashed Americans.

>>935340
disabled veteran at that

>>935316
but how to pay for war if cut tax?

http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1242007-which-republican-candidate-do-you-want-to-win-the-primaries

Paul still winning immensely even with the Perryspambot.

>>935402
>114 votes, all from internet users
Nice poll there bro.

>>935403
LOL!! ITS SO FUNNY CAUSE ITS TRUE.
THEY REALLY ARE ALL FAT AND STUPID XD

IT'S TIME TO HIT THE RESET BUTTON, AMERICA.

OBAMA IS TRYING TO SAIL A SINKING SHIP TO SHORE.

THIS SYSTEM CAN'T TAKE IT ANY LONGER.

RON PAUL 2012.

>>935488

You are /pol/'s best tripfag. All hail you sir.

Here are some fun facts:

You won't get tax cuts because taxes pay the interest on loans given to the government by the Fed, and as long as you are in debt the government cannot reduce taxes.

The Fed is not responsible to the government and previous attempts by Politicians to improve Fed transparency have failed. (Incidentally, Ron Paul was the last guy to try)

Voting on the basis of tax cuts is a wasted vote because regardless of which candidate you choose there literally can be no significant change to taxes, and the banking families will not allow any changes to the way the Fed operates (ie in total secrecy).

Everyone in the US, Republicans especially, are brainwashed so well they aren't even aware of these facts.

>>935488
>>935508
Samefagging?

More likely than you think.
I've just filtered you.

>>935529
So have I.

>>935529

I don't samefag and I certainly don't care if some feral bushpig filters me.

BTW, can you spot who's missing in this picture?

>>932478
Des Monies Plain Register (The local paper) shows the following numbers going into Tuesdays Iowa Caucus..take with a grain of salt

Romney: 24%
Paul: 22%
Santorum: 15%
Gingrich: 12%
Perry 11%
Bachmann: 7%

>>935514

Who's going to hold the federal government accountable to the debts? The federal government?

>>935560
The bankers.

>>935550
>get filtered
>namecall
Yeah, that's how you make people care what you have to say.

>>935574

>grassyknollretard.jog

>>935591
why keep running after you've shit yourself

>>935293
>The curious thing is how many "people" are against Paul
cus he sucks

>yet they don't rise to defend their GOP candidate of choice.
cus they all suck

the fact you need this explained to you shows you're a retard

>>935606

Because The Constitution.

>>935591
As a Ron Paul supporter this greatly amuses me.

>>935606
The power of Paul compels him.

So if he loses it's yet another conspiracy, right?

>>935655
Damn right it is. Even as we speak the shadow elite plot against us.

with in 2% of Romney despite massive media black out

had they given everyone equal air time during the debates we might have seen things turn out differently.

>>935682

Or his racist newsletter would be given more time and he would be asked more about that, he'd get irate like an old geezer and alienate voters.

>>934924
>Unbearable taxes
Are you fucking kidding me? I live in Britain and laugh at your fag version of taxes. Really put the squeeze on everyone or GTFO.

Also, Ron Paul:"It is not France's responsibility to be the policemen of the world. If the American colonists want their independence, let them do it themselves. We should simply set an example."

>>935591

>mf at the witnesses' reactions

>>935698

Paul never said those words. That doesn't even make any sense.

>>935715
Try and read the context of the picture. This is probably what Paul would have said after Saratoga.