Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳

  • STOP SOPA BEFORE IT DESTROYS THE WEB


    File : 1324124689.jpg-(11 KB, 300x221, David_Cameron_149390t.jpg)
    11 KB Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:24 No.718676  
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-16224394

    > David Cameron has said the UK is a Christian country "and we should not be afraid to say so".
    >In a speech in Oxford on the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible, the prime minister called for a revival of traditional Christian values to counter Britain's "moral collapse".
    >He said "live and let live" had too often become "do what you please

    Opinions?

    Is he being an idiot again or just doing what he can to stem the tide of muslims?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:26 No.718682
    Just releasing more hot air. He never acts on any issue.

    (A veto isn't an action it's choosing not to act)
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:27 No.718683
    Is there an election coming up?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:27 No.718689
    What people of all political stripes have failed to realize is that you don't make lasting victories by electing a candidate or passing legislation. You make them by moving the debate to where both sides are roughly in line with your ideals.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:27 No.718691
    >>718683

    No
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:27 No.718692
    I didn't think there were enough christians left to bother fishing for votes.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:28 No.718694
    >>718689
    so in that sense this is a win for the right
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:28 No.718696
    was this the same David Cameron that said Christians should learn to be more tolerant and welcoming after children's aid refused to let a christian couple have foster Children because they were afraid their Christian beliefs on gays would twist the children.

    This man don't speak the truth, he says exactly what his audience wants to hear.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1364411/David-Cameron-Foster-ban-ruling-right-anti-gay-Chris
    tian-couple.html
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:28 No.718700
    PLAY BALL WITH MERKEL'S PLAN TO TAKE OVER THE CONTINENT YOU SILLY BRITCUNT

    UR FUCKING UP THE CURRENCY WITH YOUR DRAMATICS
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:29 No.718704
         File1324124954.jpg-(23 KB, 460x276, David-Cameron-007.jpg)
    23 KB
    If it leads to us taking less muslim dick I don't see too much of an issue with it.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:29 No.718706
    >>718700
    >I am not qualified to speak on this subject
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:29 No.718711
    >>718696
    >That sentence
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:30 No.718715
    Blair was far worse in his talks about Christianity.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:31 No.718720
    This is the only thing a country can do to defend against it's culture being taken over.

    If a country is mostly atheist it will sit back and let Muslims take over till their largest religion is Islam.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:31 No.718722
    Has a point, we are a Christian country.

    The only people brave enough to voice thier religious beliefs in this country though are Muslims.

    I didn't even know Cameron was a Christian until now, no one wants to talk about religion anymore, and considering its still a huge part of society ... that seems rather counter-intuitive in terms of cultural harmony, no?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:36 No.718748
         File1324125389.jpg-(36 KB, 502x523, 1323894471033.jpg)
    36 KB
    I love Cameron for the fact he says shit like this, it really must rustle the jimmies on the lib dems and extremist groups. Even if he doesn't act on anything half the time it is hilarious to watch accusations of racism on forums and video comments.

    Keep up the trolling Dave.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:37 No.718759
    >>718676
    Queen of England is the head of the church

    England is a christian country
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:39 No.718772
    >>718759

    And Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:39 No.718775
    Cameron seems more and more badass.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:40 No.718778
    NO CATHOLICS THOUGH!
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:40 No.718782
    An old WW2 sailor once said.

    "There are no athiests when your ship is under attack"
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:41 No.718785
         File1324125665.jpg-(38 KB, 294x313, 1266801793269.jpg)
    38 KB
    >MFW every comment I come across in which someone mentions they are christian has been downvoted

    Stay petty athiests.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:41 No.718786
    I think the face that he says "live and let live" had too often become "do what you please" really encapsulates the failures of multiculturalist theories. Sure it's nice to have a few new folks over, but when the expectation is for you to kowtow to people who are supposedly your equals, things have gotten out of hand.

    I don't think Cameron has done a very good job overall, but this one gesture really speaks to me.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:42 No.718792
    >>718692

    When asked what religion they were. 72% of people said Christian.

    How many of those 72% were serious is anyones guess though.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:43 No.718800
    Can you start your own religion?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:45 No.718807
    >>718800

    Yes, you need 10,000 followers for it to be officially classes as a religion and receive tax exception.

    Jedi should have become a religion but no one has come forward to officially set it up.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:46 No.718818
    >>718785

    > Talk about how this is good for non religious people because it gives a culture to grab onto so we don't get swept away in a tide of immigrants
    > Down voted

    Fucking liberals man.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:47 No.718819
    Big deal. So he said something to appeal to Christian voters. He won't pass any laws to strengthen Christianity. He won't do anything to counter multiculturalism. If he's going to be a decent prime minister he should start acting and stop talking.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:47 No.718823
    Cameron always goes for the right wing views that appeals to the ignorant masses that live in England. His actual policies are detrimental to the vast majority of the country, so he balances it out by peddling fear, and typical Daily Mail views.

    Like when he said he would remove the benefits of the rioters, and used it as an opportunity to try remove the Human Rights Act.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:48 No.718832
    >>718823

    > Telling EU and Muslims to fuck off
    > detrimental to the vast majority of the country,
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:50 No.718840
    >Is he being an idiot again or just doing what he can to stem the tide of muslims?

    the only way to stem the tide of muslims is to lose religious freedom.

    >you anglican nao!
    >butbut i'm catholic!!!
    >butbut i'm protestant!!!
    >butbut i'm orthodox!!!
    >butbut i'm from the western branch of american reform presbylutheranism
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:50 No.718848
    >>718807


    The religion of political incorrectness.
    Pledge your life to the cause of spreading jokes of a racial humour at least once a day.
    If you don't, well, ok, it's not like we are going to cut your head off.
    And if they try to shut us down we can shout them down as being racistswantstokill6millionpeopleoffaith
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:50 No.718855
    >>718823

    > "Elitist babble"

    Maybe I read the Daily Mail because i'm sick of trying to be brainwashed into having my beliefs be lockstep with that of Labour's, as every other paper except the Telegraph wants of me. A lot of good you fucking liberals have done for this country...
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:51 No.718858
    >>718840

    If you're a Christian in Britain you're already going to be Church of England.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:52 No.718864
    >>718832

    You do know he told the EU to fuck off because they wanted to further regulate the banks? The regeneration of many cities in the UK has been funded by EU money through the EDA. The trade opportunities that the EU represent have helped the economy of the UK, more than it has damaged it. Now we are isolated, purely because Cameron and Osborne wanted to protect The City of London. They haven't even tried to spin it, that is what they have said. The same City of London that caused the problems, and economic crisis.

    Muslims are not a threat to the way of life in this country, even if the Daily Mail, and The Sun have brainwashed you to believe otherwise. Sorry.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:54 No.718875
    >>718840
    How about shutting down immigration from their countries, sending them back if they commit a crime and then rigidly policing their communities?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:55 No.718880
    Let me pose a question.

    What newspaper is acceptable from the denizens of /pol/?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:55 No.718881
    >>718785

    This is why I hate modern atheism.

    >You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being.
    >Albert Einstein

    It's embarrassing that more and more dummies are claiming to represent science or logic in the name of 'atheism' - when all they are is anti-religion and its fucking obvious.

    >>718855

    The Independent is usually quite good if you want to steer clear of political bias (as the name suggests) but they are INCREDIBLY liberal, sometimes to the point of frustration. I've found the Herald to be a pretty decent all rounder, they have won alot of awards recently for thier journalism as well.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:55 No.718882
    >>718864

    Lol, Cameron defended the banks because we are a banking nation. We make money through banking and do the most banking in the entire world.

    The EU regulations would have hurt our banks.

    > Muslims are not a threat to the way of life in this country

    Tell me that when we're a majority brown nation in 2050
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:56 No.718890
    >In British Attitudes Survey in 2010, 43% were Christian and 51% no religion

    That makes the rest of the religions, that the Daily Mail have convinced many idiots are a threat, make up about 4 percent of the rest of the country. But anything to justify voting for, and backing this fascist idiot.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:56 No.718895
    He is trying to appeal to the strong christian vote. Labour have lost significant votes from christian communities due to Labours obvious support of Islamification. Labour really only appeals to uneducated working class northerners, immigrants and trade union lefties. Gays in UK vote Lib dems.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:56 No.718896
         File1324126616.jpg-(28 KB, 417x521, Queen Elizabeth.jpg)
    28 KB
    >>718858

    god save the queen-pope
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:57 No.718897
    >>718882
    Your banks will be your economic doom one day.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:57 No.718899
    >>718890
    >fascist idiot

    Who?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:57 No.718905
    >>718882

    The banks are what caused the current economic crisis, and it wasn't because they were borrowing money to nations. Don't say its a banking nation when its not, they pay next to no tax, and neither do a lot of companies in the UK thanks to this government. The banks do not support the UK in anyway.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:57 No.718907
    >>718855

    Don't read the daily mail dude, they don't know what side they're on.

    Sometimes they post articles about how immigrants cause everything, then they post an article about how the EDL, the only people standing up to immigrants, are Nazis.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:57 No.718908
    >>718875
    >How about shutting down immigration from their countries, sending them back if they commit a crime and then rigidly policing their communities?

    rigidly policing their communities has a bad aftertaste. when you can get away with doing it to them, why not expand it some moar? where's the downturn?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:58 No.718909
    >>718895

    >Gays in UK vote Lib dems.

    I don't think anyone votes Lib Dem anymore.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:59 No.718921
    >>718905

    >nevergofullretard.png
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)07:59 No.718923
    >>718905

    > The banks do not support the UK in anyway.
    > 10% of GDP is banking

    > The banks are what caused the current economic crisis

    Just not our banks

    > they pay next to no tax, and neither do a lot of companies in the UK thanks to this government.

    That's a good thing, people seem to forget that the idea of the UK was originally that it was a free market like the US.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:00 No.718932
    >>718905

    They support the UK, but they are not loyal to it.

    I think thats why Cam was wrong to protect them so much. HSBC moved to China, whats to stop others doing the same? Nothing.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:02 No.718944
    >>718932

    > HSBC moved to China

    Really? People are this stupid?

    You realise HSBC means Hong Kong Shanghai Banking corporation right?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:04 No.718956
    >>718944

    Obviously.

    I meant they moved operations out of the UK.

    Didn't think that was hard to understand.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:04 No.718962
    >>718944
    HSBC MADE ITS WILD PROFITS BY BEING THE PREMIER HK BANK, ACTING AS GATEWAY TO MONETARY FLOWS FOR TRADE IN AND OUT OF ASIA

    HK WAS THE BRITISH OWNED BANKING CHOKE POINT OF ASIA FOR OVER A CENTURY
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:06 No.718976
    > OWS fags blaming the banks because their lib arts degree can't get them a job

    Why do you want to join the EU so much and suck Jewish cock? They're just going to put measures in place because they're jelly of our banking.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:06 No.718981
    Damn immigrants everywhere.

    Fuck all you guys, I am voting Tory and BNP from now on.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:07 No.718984
    >>718981

    Just Tory, any vote that isn't for Tory is a vote for labour.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:07 No.718987
    >>718944

    People who back the banks, and this government aren't very smart to begin with.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:08 No.718991
    >>718981
    Vote tory? LOLWUT

    Immigration has gone up since David Cameron got into power. Vote BNP or UKIP
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:09 No.719000
    Christians in UK 72%

    then it was athiests at 16%

    muslims 3% lol.

    hindus 1%

    yeah muslims are sure running over the uk.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:09 No.719001
    >>718991

    See

    >>718984

    Immigration has gone up for two reasons, one the EU control our borders, two we don't have a Tory government. We have a Tory government with a lib dem boat anchor round their necks.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:10 No.719005
    >>718944

    Really? People are this stupid?

    You realise that HSBC was run in british interests for over a century, and that Hong Kong was owned by Britian until 1997?

    You are the cancer that is killing /banking/
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:10 No.719006
    >>718984
    BNP cant get anything done?
    How is it a vote for BNP is a vote for labour?

    Sorry but I am young and have only voted once, pretty much media/schooling had me thinking labour was good for our country and Tory were racists.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:10 No.719007
    >>718984

    Why would anyone vote Labour over the Tories? I mean Labour are backed by the unions, and the Tories are backed by the banks, and patriots like Philip Green. Why would anyone vote for Labour who are backed by organisations that represent the vast majority of the country? Vote Tory, they're backed by the small, financial elite.

    God, English people are so dumb.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:12 No.719019
    >>719005

    It's funny how people who generally try to defend the banks, do it because they refuse to believe that this government would be so brazen in the shocking measures that they take. Frightening, I can't wait to leave England.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:12 No.719021
    Cameron has been acting very strange recently.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:12 No.719022
    >>719007

    Few people vote for labour directly but don't realise that a vote for any other party but Tory is an indirect vote for labour.

    >>719006

    Because you are wasting your vote on small parties instead of combining it with everyones vote for Tory so they can beat Labour by a majority.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:14 No.719035
    >>719021

    Yeah when was the last time we had a Prime Minister that helped the country like he's doing?

    UK is becoming more nationalist because of constant pressure from the EU and Immigrants. He want's to keep the votes so adapts.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:15 No.719038
    >>718676

    Sarkozy did it first.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:15 No.719041
    >>719021

    He has been thrown off recently by the euro crisis mostly, those hours spent in the chamber with the rest of the EU leaders and no support (you aren't even allowed to have an aide in with you) was probably one of the toughest points of his career.

    The fallout when he got home was also probably quite disheartening.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:15 No.719042
    >>719038

    I thought France was doing everything possible to remove it's cultural identity not defend it.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:17 No.719050
    >>719041

    > The fallout when he got home was also probably quite disheartening.

    Does he understand that pretty much everyone in the UK agrees with his position.

    I wouldn't want him to believe the Lib Dems whispering in his ear that he did bad.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:17 No.719051
    >>719035

    Fuck off back to the Daily Mail comments section, fascist.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:17 No.719055
    I remember once in school we were discussing politics and teacher asked what party we thought we would vote for. People were for the most part saying Labour with a few lib-dems inbetween.
    Then it came to me and I said Tory. Silence afterwords with other kids staring at me. lol no friends after that.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:19 No.719065
         File1324127968.jpg-(109 KB, 400x398, 9206980.jpg)
    109 KB
    >>719051

    > Be Nationalist
    > Get called Fascist and Racist.

    Typical liberal response.

    Remember when being proud of your culture and country wasn't called bad things?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:20 No.719070
    >>719055

    Was the class filled with poor people?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:20 No.719071
    >>719050

    There are plenty of people who disagree with his position, more so if the EU actually manages to pull itself out of the mess and be stronger for it. I think mostly, the people who agree with him are either blind nationalists (fair enough, but at least admit it) or are gambling that the EU is going to get significantly weaker and/or collapse (so they want to stay out of it, again fair comment)

    If that dosen't happen however, his choice will evolve into being a mistake in the eyes of history. Globalization is the future, and many argue that a fiscal union EU is also the future.

    Anyway, this is off topic so I'll leave it at that.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:21 No.719080
         File1324128066.gif-(12 KB, 501x585, jew-bwa-ha-ha.gif)
    12 KB
    >>719071

    > Globalization is the future
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:22 No.719088
    Ian Hislop described the EU fiasco on have I got news for you fantastically.

    "EU politicians have been claiming Britain will be left on the sidelines! That's a horrible thought, EU going down the plug hole and we're left on the sidelines".
    >> Exotic Cheroot !BmuEHxgGuY 12/17/11(Sat)08:23 No.719090
         File1324128200.jpg-(66 KB, 640x818, VoteCameronGetMurdoch.jpg)
    66 KB
    >>719021

    Cameron is stuck in a rut because his associations with Murdoch really damaged him over the summer. Especially after he said "I have no problems with Andy Coulson as my director of communications, I believe he didn't do anything" and look how that turned out.

    The public seem to have a lack of trust in what he is doing so he is trying everything to get support, especially with Murdoch revelations flying out weekly from the Leveson Inquiry. Cameron's so associated with Murdoch that anything that happens there is going to hit him and his cabinet hard. So he's doing this to try build support in the media while he can afford to and before the papers all become extremely toxic to politicians as the inquiry goes on. (Can't rely on TV to give you a good word due to OFCOM rules)
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:24 No.719093
    >>719071

    >globalisation

    Just wait until that oil runs out
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:25 No.719099
    >>719088
    >Implying the UK isn't going down the plughole anyway

    There were legit arguments for veto'ing the treaty proposed, but those weren't the arguments used. Instead it was "herpa derp derp BRITAIN IS BEST derp derp derp". David Cameron appears more the blundering buffoon the more I see of him.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:26 No.719101
    >>719071

    Even if Europe regains control and becomes rich what is wrong with staying out of it?

    The problem with the EU is it's not compatible with our way of life, continental countries have had constantly changing borders and their cultures are pretty much all the same.
    We have a defined border and have a vastly different culture to Europeans. In the past we never bothered with Europe and instead built out colonial empire.

    Mainly I'm against the EU for their desire to remove sovereignty from nations and put power in unelected leaders.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:26 No.719102
    >>719070
    Meh kind of.
    I would say it was half middle class half poor.
    No one was rich, they all went to a better school. Also no immigrants in the school either.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:27 No.719110
    >>719099

    >Implying the UK isn't going down the plughole anyway
    >implying its not going down because it's being dragged by the EU
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:28 No.719114
    Can't wait to return to puritan Britian, with our glorious leader zombie Oliver Cromwell!
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:28 No.719117
    >put power in unelected leaders

    all of our shitty leaders were elected by us.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:30 No.719127
    People seem to have this strange view that we need the EU more than they need us.
    They say we do most of a trading with the EU so need to stay within it.

    In actual fact we trade more with all the countries we've spent hundreds of years building economic ties with. America, Australia, India, East Asian countries.

    We don't need the EU for trade, but they need us for our money, nuclear deterrent, army and strong alliance with the US.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:30 No.719130
         File1324128614.png-(59 KB, 561x570, swiss_cute.png)
    59 KB
    >>718676

    Switzerland and the United Kingdom should form some kind of Christian heritage union
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:30 No.719133
    >>719130

    Is Switzerland a Christian nation?
    I thought it was mainly an atheist nation.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:31 No.719136
         File1324128675.jpg-(104 KB, 500x500, 1315741943458.jpg)
    104 KB
    Globalisation is OK as long as it includes only the culturally compatible western world, and is globalisation, not centralisation (no EU, yes to free movement of people and capital).
    Third world mozlems and niggers should not be allowed in, at least until they stop being mozlems and niggers.
    >> Exotic Cheroot !BmuEHxgGuY 12/17/11(Sat)08:31 No.719137
    >>719117

    There were a bunch of Germans in a palace already telling us what to do well before the EU
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:32 No.719147
    >>719136
    >>719136

    You're using the term globalization as if it were a choice. It isn't.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:34 No.719156
    Getting involved in European affairs was the worst idea ever.

    We should have just chilled and remained neutral in WW2 like Switzerland. Hitler wasn't going to attack us, he respected our imperialism. But we just HAD to defend Poland didn't we?

    We could have been chilling right now with our Empire intact and the Glorious German Reich controlling the world with us.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:35 No.719159
    >>719133
    http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/index/themen/01/05/blank/key/religionen.html
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:35 No.719160
    >>719110
    >Implying the EU caused the housing bubble in the UK
    >Implying the EU was responsible for both private and public over-spending in the UK
    >Implying the EU was responsible for the UK banking crisis
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:35 No.719161
    >>719133

    No. More than 90% Christian
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:36 No.719167
    >>719159
    >>719161

    No wonder all the Muslims stay out.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:40 No.719188
    >>719160

    I'm sure the millions paid to the EU every day instead of fixing those issues isn't a problem.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:41 No.719199
    A strong christian revival is the best chance the West has to save itself from multiculturalism. I say this as an atheist.
    >> (ノ´_ゝ`)ノ !MoeMoe/nYc 12/17/11(Sat)08:42 No.719203
         File1324129357.jpg-(44 KB, 604x453, 1277777926780.jpg)
    44 KB
    >>719199
    >I say this as an idiot.
    Fixed.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:43 No.719214
    >>719203
    butthurt atheist detected.
    Even I agree with him and I am a atheist.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:48 No.719251
    >>719147

    Globalisation with muslims / niggers is a choice.
    >> (ノ´_ゝ`)ノ !MoeMoe/nYc 12/17/11(Sat)08:50 No.719267
         File1324129818.jpg-(996 KB, 1920x1200, 1290649952485.jpg)
    996 KB
    >>719214
    Get real, faggot, this is a false dichotomy, you ignore the alternative of a modern secular and free society.
    I rather have 10% niggers and civil liberties than hardcore Christians in power who outlaw porn and wearing skirts that end above the knee, but that's not the choice we face. A free society can limit immigration just fine and the people start to learn why that's preferable, now that the results of the multicultural dogma become apparent.
    >> Exotic Cheroot !BmuEHxgGuY 12/17/11(Sat)08:51 No.719279
    >>719088

    Watch last nights one. There was more gold though there was a bit more hammering of Cameron for being belligerent. Though the Channel 4 re-inactment of when Nick Clegg found out was gold (God I love C4 news. They just realized the world has just gone absurd and are just rolling with it.)

    Also drink every time they say "allegedly" if you are watching tonights Have I Got Even More News For You. Guaranteed alcohol poisoning
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:52 No.719284
    He's supporting Christianity because it supports multiculturalism

    Mr Cameron also said it was "easier for people to believe and practise other faiths when Britain has confidence in its Christian identity".

    "Many people tell me it is much easier to be Jewish or Muslim here in Britain than it is in a secular country like France," he said.

    "Why? Because the tolerance that Christianity demands of our society provides greater space for other religious faiths too.

    "And because many of the values of a Christian country are shared by people of all faiths and indeed by people of no faith at all."
    >> (ノ´_ゝ`)ノ !MoeMoe/nYc 12/17/11(Sat)08:55 No.719300
         File1324130151.jpg-(868 KB, 2250x3000, 1323797417565.jpg)
    868 KB
    >>719284
    The problem is that "Christian values" contain a whole lot of oppressive bullshit and all of them are based on an old book that can be read in a myriad of ways and used to justify everything.

    You can have all these values without the ridiculous belief.
    Christianity has no place in politics. It's inherently irrational.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:56 No.719303
    >>719267

    Your choice are as follows

    Christianity that is so lax that it's basically Secularism that's called Christianity

    Radical Islam


    Cameron chose the first.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:57 No.719311
    >>719284

    It's easier to practise a religion in Britain than France because Britain hasn't banned all public displays of religion.

    It's this thing we call freedom.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:57 No.719315
    >>719251
    So is suicide.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)08:58 No.719316
    Christianity at its heart is an apolitical religion.

    Islam at its heart is a political religion.

    Guess which one is more compatible with secularism?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:01 No.719337
    >>719300

    You are an idiot. Clearly you have never studied religion or history.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:03 No.719345
    >>719316
    Not really. You can have both religions acting both ways. Just visit some rural regions in middle Europe, you'll be under a reign of fundamentalist Christian would-be popes that try to run their town the good ole traditional way, beat women and hide inter-marital rape.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:04 No.719347
    I believe that Cameron is not being an idiot...this time. Secularism has basically caused a gap that Christianity used to fill, and Islam is planning to fill. Accepting Christianity in the public sphere is imperative to maintaining European culture in this time of mass immigration, though a bit of national pride helps as well.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:05 No.719351
         File1324130717.jpg-(33 KB, 320x329, westboro_protest.jpg)
    33 KB
    >>719316
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:05 No.719353
    >>719345
    >Just visit some rural regions in middle Europe
    You mean like the Czech republic, which is 70% atheist? A lot of formerly communist countries have seen a massive detoriation of Christianity during the cold war, with Poland and Lithuania being notable exceptions.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:07 No.719363
    >>719353
    >>719353

    No, I mean countries like Austria, Switzerland and Germany. I've lived in all three countries for a while - christian nutsacks are everywhere. Mostly concerning is that most of these whackjobs are in rather high political positions.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:07 No.719364
    >>719351
    This is Christianity:
    Catholocism is the grumpy old dad who keeps telling his kids (Protestants) to get their shit straight and his wife (Orthodox) to get back to the kitchen.
    Church of England is the guy who hardly takes anything seriously and is pretty easy going.
    Evangelism is the extremely cheerful little girl who wants to talk to everyone.
    Westboro Baptist church is the backwards, inbred cousin the rest of the family is ashamed of.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:08 No.719366
    >>719316
    > more compatible
    less incompatible
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:11 No.719378
    >>719345
    I am from Eastern Europe, and you are retarded, basing all you say on primitive accusations.
    >>719345
    That's because both Poland and Lithuania both shared the same culture during their dissolution in 1795, and so the Catholic Church became the main source of disobedience towards occupying powers. This was used as a pattern during commie days after WWII, and it worked.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:12 No.719383
    > Using a Middle eastern religion to defend against another Middle eastern religion.

    If we want to defend European culture shouldn't we convert to Druidism?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:12 No.719384
         File1324131138.jpg-(51 KB, 580x392, cameron-pope.jpg)
    51 KB
    Cameron meets the authors of the KJB!?
    Seriously, wasn't the whole idea of the printing press and reformation in England to get rid of these parasites?
    FAIL!
    >> (ノ´_ゝ`)ノ !MoeMoe/nYc 12/17/11(Sat)09:12 No.719386
         File1324131145.jpg-(1001 KB, 2227x3000, 1323796137344.jpg)
    1001 KB
    >>719337
    Clearly you live in an ivory tower and completely ignore what religious people outside of academics think and believe.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:13 No.719390
    >>719364
    >trying to personify denominations
    in what way are wbc truth claims any less valid than the other denominations truth claims?
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:14 No.719394
         File1324131271.png-(282 KB, 1000x670, 1323290919797.png)
    282 KB
    >>719364
    Here in the Netherlands with have the Christen union (stupid party) these guys want to ban freedom of speech.
    if someone wants to deny the holocaust, let them.
    freaking nut jobs.

    I also know the son of one of their parties highest guys.
    I heard that guy talking with his gf about a pregnancy test so I lolled when he didn't listen to daddy to wait before marriage.
    fucking non catholics.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:15 No.719398
    >>719390
    Because WBC can't into bible study while the other denominations at least try to interpret the scripture.

    For example, I'm not even a christian and I can already tell that "God hates fags" is nonsense. In Christianity (after the NT), the doctrine basically became "hate the sin, love the sinners" so "God hates faggotry" would be more accurate.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:17 No.719402
    >>719394
    Fellow Dutchman here.
    Isn't holocaust denial already banned in Germany?

    I do agree with you on freedom of speech though. Freedom of speech is exactly there to protect what other people DON'T want to hear, and as long as you back up what you say with logical reasoning or evidence and remain polite, there shouldn't be a reason why you can't say whatever you want.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:17 No.719403
    >>719402
    Holocaust denial is banned in Germany.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:19 No.719405
    >>719402
    >>719403
    Try to search stormfront.org on google.de.
    I don't agree with sf but that is never a reason to deny freedom of speech.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:19 No.719409
    >>719403
    Fucking nonsense. I know the holocaust is sensitive in Germany, but if people have legitimate reasons to doubt it, one should be able to discuss it. Whatever we wish to say or think is no affair of the state, and only a totalitarian regime would dream of doing it.

    Then again, democracy is arguably the one of the most totalitarian political systems around.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:19 No.719410
    >>719383
    Yes. Considering the British Isles were Celtic and Norse, we should pretty much just go back to that.
    >> (ノ´_ゝ`)ノ !MoeMoe/nYc 12/17/11(Sat)09:20 No.719411
    >>719403
    Germany is a also a fortified democracy.
    It's not truly free in any sense.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streitbare_Demokratie
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:20 No.719413
    >>719410
    This. HAIL WOTAN.
    >> Anonymous 12/17/11(Sat)09:21 No.719420
    >>719410
    That ship has sailed the very moment the British set off to fuck up other countries on the other side of the world.


    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]