But you are though. We all know you started the pedo photo thread, too.

>>420676
>pedo photo thread
When was this and why did I MISS IT

A 17 year old can be charged as a pedo if his 17 year old girlfriend sends him nude photos. She can also be charged for having these images.

America.

A while back I read about a 21 year old pussy who went around with a list full of sex offenders and their addresses and started killing them.

One guy was killed. He fucked his girlfriend like 2 weeks shy before she turned 16 (legal age of consent). He was killed when he answered his door at his GIRLFRIEND'S PLACE

What does America consider that? Stockholm syndrome? Certainly she couldn't have loved this dangerous man enough to live with him!

>>420702
Can be? Yes. Will be?

Highly, highly unlikely...prisons have fucking overflown.

I've always been against these laws. They serve their time and they don't deserve more punishment. There's no evaluation whatsoever involved, they're simply on the list.

If they think you're a menace to society why dont they give them MORE TIME? I haven't heard once about the list helping anyone. I hear more stories about people getting hurt from being on it. I hear stories about people beating the shit out of sex offenders because they found out one was living on their street.

I wish there was something we could do to let it known that this is a very serious issue.


Also incoming retards who aren't open and support anything that says "for the childreN"

>>420721
Bullshit. If the guy sends pics of his girlfriend somewhere because he's upset and she broke up with him or if someone merely finds out the pictures exist and calls the cops, he's in trouble.

And to think even that would give him prison time and 10 years on the sex offender registry is ridiculous. It's not just a list; you can't get a job or a place to live. You are bombarded with death threats by neighbors. Nobody wants to be around you. Your life is OVER. TEN YEARS is minimum. When he's 27, he can finally go back to school and get a job. Even then he has to fill out job applications and mention what he did, which will likely make it difficult for him to find a job.

So he's fucked. Forever.

Reactionary laws are bullshit. What can you do about them? Nothing. America is not a country where logic and reasoning exists. By now you should already know this.

This type of nanny-state totalitarianism is entirely thanks to allowing women to vote.

sex offender laws are the new Jim crow laws, for reals

Hey guys

all thanks to fucking feminism

it's time we put leftist in FEMA camps

>>420901

>America

CRIMINALIZE EVERYTHING

All parents need to be thrown in prison for sex crimes because they've all seen their children naked. Mothers especially need to be prosecuted for forcing their children to touch their genitals at birth.

>>421134
You've never been to Britain.

We need another global war or struggle, so that men can rise to their true place in the world once again, and we can put these leftist faggots and dykes in the ground.

>>420664
Why would you expect Law to be logical?­

thats what happens when you let women vote or become politicians, the faggot liberal men they enable is also a consequence

A "sex offender" is also anyone who gets so pissed that they take their pants off on the stumble home.

Public nudity.

>vote for liberalism
>get liberalism
>act outraged

Eat shit.

>Last week the parents of a Wisconsin boy sued Grant County District Attorney Lisa Riniker for charging their son with first-degree sexual assault, a Class B felony, after he played "butt doctor" with a 5-year-old girl.

Stop Lisa Riniker page:

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-Lisa-Riniker/296124377084961?sk=wall

5 year old is a sex predator? Really? Does the kid even have the biological capability/urge to commit a sex act?

>>423344
Kid should have been slapped with malpractice. Fucking pretending to be a proctologist.

>>423269
>Stop Lisa Riniker page: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-Lisa-Riniker/296124377084961?sk=wall

It's a damn shame Americans don't tar and feather scumbags like this anymore.

>implying America isn't full of complete pussies who won't try to change the sex laws

Me having consensual sex with my girlfriend when we were 15 was illegal. Makes sense.

cp = pictures

The people who should be in trouble are the ones in the pictures, not the ones who stumbled upon it on Kazaa in 2004. Seriously there is a guy now serving 25 years for that. America.

>>425264
source?

That feel when I fuck my 14 year old GF, land of the free, lol

You know that nobody really cares unless you are REALLY a pedo, right?

The jails are overflowing the law won't do jack to teenaged fuckbuddies.

>>425562
>“Without the registry,” says Shirley Turner, “he would still be alive today.” She is referring, in a 2006 interview with Human Rights Watch, to her 24-year-old son, William Elliot. He was murdered that year by a pedophile-hunting Canadian gunman who found his name and address in Maine’s online database of sex offenders. Elliot’s crime: When he was 19, he had sex with his girlfriend, who was three weeks shy of 16, the age of consent in Maine.

>>425574
Yes, because the law murdered that guy.

In other news, Ted Bundy killed chicks for being blonde.

>>425583
>You know that nobody really cares unless you are REALLY a pedo, right?

>>425593
>aspie taking everything literally

go back to your hugbox, I obviously can't speak for total psychos.

america, land of the free [spoiler]to live your life a pedophile[/spoiler]

>>425654
0/10
It's the complete opposite

You can stab someone and be more free than the guy who gets caught with a thumbnail of cp from browsing /b/. If you support these laws then you're a bigger retard than America itself

>>425654
>pedophiles thinking everyone else is a pedophile so they can sleep at night

>>425661
>have one thumbnail
>anything happens to you

[citation needed]

>>421154
>>421154

>criminalize everything
>Britain
>implying that's not just the media trying to sensationalise stuff to MAKE everyone a criminal
>implying dumb mobs listening to the right wing media ended up vandalising a paediatrician's house because they thought he was a paedo

Have any of you ever actually read everything about Megan's law?

It doesn't just cover pedophilia, it also covers domestic abuse.

The law basically makes any man accused of domestic abuse guilty until proven innocent.

It's almost like this law, in combination with registry, was made to just completely fuck men over.

Women.

>>425695

Too bad the left wing media does it too

>>425697

http://www.browndailyherald.com/letter-in-defense-of-u-s-handling-of-mccormick-1.2670225

>Hunter Fast '12, in his opinion column related to the alleged William McCormick sexual assault incident at Brown ("It can't happen here," Nov. 11), forgets an important issue that supports the University's management of the unfortunate incident: Women have always been at an extreme disadvantage when faced with sexual aggression.

>What is rape all about? It is the physical coercion of a man seeking sexual domination over a woman. It is one of the historical tragedies in the history of mankind that has never been resolved. As such there is no level playing field in sexual relationships. Women who have been raped have to deal with a male-dominated and biased justice system, a male-dominated and biased police force, and yes, even a male-dominated and biased student body that at one time included McCormick.

>The University is to be applauded for its attempt to level this playing field. It has chosen not to expose the female student to the inequality of the justice system. The message to all males is: "You need to check your behavior carefully before you enter into a relationship with a woman. There will be no due process if you are accused of rape. The woman's version of what happened will always be accepted over the man's account."

>If a male student knew that was the policy hopefully this would serve as a check on sexually aggressive behavior. McCormick might have backed away from this relationship, knowing the consequences he might face. He might well have remained a part of the student body, and everyone would be wiser.

>>425697
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan%27s_Law

Megan's Law is not any ONE law, it's an informal category of laws, so you'd have to provide specific examples since this thing varies widely from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

>>425729

we should let feminists be in charge of all laws

>>421126
>>423178
>>420865
change the record samefag

>>425683
If someone reports it, yes.

sure is medieval inquisition & witch hunt mentality ITT

>>420664
>Read about how awful the sex offender registry.

The theory is sound: make it easy to check for sex offenders where you live/work so you can take precautions.

Unfortunately in practice this means not only real sex offenders but 18 year old who had a 16 yr old girlfriend and the girl's parents went all legal on his ass b/c they didn't like him. Or the 30 yr dating a 17 yr and 11 month old: and of course the 17y/11m old's parents are OMG OMG OMG

So yeah, theory is not reality. Until the laws about sex crimes focus on consent and not someone's disapproval or hurt feelings we'll still be doing this shit.

A woman can stab a man point-blank in public and get off scot-free if she deemed him "a threat", ie. if he's speaking in a loud tone.

>>425771
That's not exactly a citation.

"the girl is "the daughter of a well-known political figure in Grant County," and her brother, who is the same age, also was involved in playing doctor but was not charged. "

The only relevant question here is was the girl a willing participant or did they force her? Even if she was bullied we're talking about therapy and an investigation into the home environment.

I was sure the law already considered sexual experimentation/play between children of similar ages were no bullying or force was involved to be a non issue; this bs shouldn't even have gone to court. I guess it varies state to state.

>>425830
>A woman can stab a man point-blank in public and get off scot-free if she deemed him "a threat", ie. if he's speaking in a loud tone.

Give it up faggot. Only a retard believes the 'ZMOG the wimmins are out to cut my dick off' shit you keep spamming.

http://www.patriotledger.com/opinions/opinions_columnists/x137170682/WENDY-MURPHY-Steps-to-prevent-a
nother-Penn-State

>Congress should use its federal funding power under the “Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act” to force states to adopt laws that require ALL adults with reason to believe a child has been abused to file reports with child welfare agencies. Failure to report should carry the same sanction as other Clery Act violations such that noncompliant universities face substantial fines.

>Some argue that ramping up punishment for non-reporting is dangerous because of the potential for false reports, but this myth-based concern has no basis in reality. In fact, people will likely be more cautious about filing only credible reports when the consequences are more serious.

>Better to protect thousands more children from real abuse than to worry about the occasional adult being burdened by a false accusation.

Feminism.

When I was a freshman in college, all males had to attend a mandatory "preventing abuse seminar"

To summarize it, all men are rapists and you have to be careful to

After the liberals were done spewing diarrhea, an actual police officer spoke to us.

He told us that the laws are fucked beyond repair and we needed to always take extra precautions to protect ourselves from false accusations.

Basically he said not to ever sleep with women are showing odd personality behaviors, never raise your voice around a woman, and always walk away if even the smallest thing is off.


The hipster feminists hated what he was saying.

ITT:Pedos screech about women as the cause for all of their problems.

But there's no link at all between homosexuality and pedophilia is there?

>>425897

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2011/10/22/toronto-melissa-lewis.html

>>425910
It's called Greece.

>>425898
>Better to protect thousands more children from real abuse than to worry about the occasional adult being burdened by a false accusation.

THIS IS WHAT LIBERALS ACTUALLY BELIEVE

Blackstone is rolling in his grave

>>425924
IK,R?

>>425918

Why are all these crazy fuckers coming from Canada?

This woman killed her bf, and the pedo killer in the ops article was from Canada, and it seems like every single one of these fuckers is from Canada

>>425940

check out karla homolka

>>425928
>Better to protect thousands more children from real abuse than to worry about the occasional adult being burdened by a false accusation.

>THIS IS WHAT LIBERALS ACTUALLY BELIEVE

I'm liberal. I don't believe that. Moron.

>>425949

>Karla Leanne Homolka, also known as Karla Leanne Teale (born 4 May 1970 in Port Credit, Ontario, Canada), is a Canadian serial killer. She attracted worldwide media attention when she was convicted of manslaughter following a plea bargain in the 1991 and 1992 rape-murders of two Ontario teenage girls, Leslie Mahaffy and Kristen French, as well as the rape and death of her own sister Tammy.[2]

>Homolka and Paul Bernardo, her husband and partner-in-crime, were arrested in 1993. In 1995, Bernardo was convicted of the two teenagers' murders and received life in prison, the full maximum sentence allowed in Canada. During the 1993 investigation, Homolka stated to investigators that Bernardo abused her, and that she was unwilling accomplice to the murders. As a result, she struck a deal with prosecutors for a reduced prison sentence of 12 years in exchange for a guilty plea for manslaughter.

>However, videotapes of the crimes later surfaced and demonstrated that she was a more active participant than she had claimed. As a result, the deal that she struck with prosecutors was dubbed in the Canadian press as the "Deal with the Devil". Public outrage about Homolka's plea deal continued until her high-profile release from prison in 2005.[3] Following her release from prison, she settled in the province of Quebec, where she married Luka Magnotta and gave birth to a boy. In 2007, the Canadian press received reports that she had left Canada for the Antilles with Magnotta, their baby and has changed her name to Leanne Teale.[4]

Lookit that women, you can even be a serial killer and all you need to do is shout "abuse!"

Jesus Christ. First /pol/ defends racism. Now /pol/ defends pedophilia.

Autism is a hell of a disorder.

>>425960

I remember feminist seminars I had to listen through in school, talking about how she was a victim

And also how it was my fault for the montreal shootings because I was a man, because the men there didn't give up their lives protecting the women who were killed.

>>425898
>>425907
>>425960

Samefag is still butthurt he never got a date in high school

>>425910

uhh there are pedo women too so why you usin pedo like it's a synonym for male?

its like those people who get pissed off at someone calling women bitches because its female specific and then call men male specific insults like neckbeards or manchildren in the next breath

sexist feminism at its finest

FUCK ALL RETARDED LAWS NAMED AFTER RETARDED LITTLE DEAD CHILDREN.

>>425972
GIVE IT UP SAMEFAG

wait its hilarious. nvd. carry on.

>>420664
Holy shit OP, didn't think anyone on /pol/ read reason.

Fuck year!

>mfw

>>425898
http://prospect.org/article/good-ol-boys-good-ol-cowardice

>There seems to be something distinctly masculine about the type of cowardice that allows one to prioritize loyalty to powerful institutions and friends over protecting children.

>>426031

Feminists are such lovely people aren't they

"“It’s one thing if you are a 40-year-old having sex with a 13-year-old,” says the report’s co-author and editor, Jamie Fellner, senior adviser to the U.S. Program of Human Rights Watch. “It’s another thing if you’re a 17-year-old boy having sex with your 16-year-old or 15-year-old girlfriend. Registration as a sex offender is just completely inappropriate there, does nothing to promote public safety, but ruins lives.”

A man who was convicted of statutory rape when he was 16 for having consensual sex with his 14-year-old girlfriend told Human Rights Watch: “We were in love. And now we are married. So it’s like I am on the registry for having premarital sex. Does having premarital sex make me a danger to society? My wife doesn’t think so.”

This shit is so retarded. It could have been a tool for keeping a watch on creeps. But it's just another "weapon" disapproving parents can use..

some actual feminists for you (turn on Closed Captioning): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f98fY7NDKM8

>>425729
>The message to all males is: "You need to check your behavior carefully before you enter into a relationship with a woman. There will be no due process if you are accused of rape. The woman's version of what happened will always be accepted over the man's account."

>>425961
Because we like to think rationally, unlike you.

>supports hate crimes
>supports a law that makes it easy for a woman to falsely accuse any man of rape, whether he's 6 or 23 year old

>>425995

Everyone's had one of these seminars at least once in their life. You must have gone to a good school

>>425898
>Wendy Murphy

"I never, ever met a false rape claim, by the way. My own statistics speak to the truth." - Wendy Murphy in response to the Duke Lacrosse case

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case

>>426031
>>over protecting children

I will now quote the single most important sentence George Carlin ever uttered:

"FUCK the children!"

I would rather 10 million children get the full Sandusky every weekend than a SINGLE innocent man be punished for a sex crime he did not commit.

>>426049
>>426035
>>426031

Is this guy a joke or wat? Did a woman stick his prick in a blender or something? Keep typing brah, we're laughing with you, not at you.

Really.

>>425907
Worried about false accusal? Just follow these simple rules:

http://www.elon.edu/e-web/students/saa/consent.xhtml
Effective Consent means words or actions that show a voluntary agreement to engage in mutually agreed-upon sexual activity.

Requires Communication Words must be used to establish consent. Only a comprehensible, unambiguous, verbal, positive and enthusiastic statement of consent for each sexual act qualifies as consent. The absence of no does not equal yes. Only YES means YES.

Must Entail An Uninfluenced, Unimpaired yes Effective consent cannot be established if one person if pressuring the other- this can be physical, verbal or emotional pressure. Influence can also mean the effects of alcohol or other drugs. If someone is asleep, passed out, has consumed alcohol or drugs, or is in any other way impaired, she or he cannot give legal consent.

Happens one step at a time – every time You must establish effective consent for every sex act and each time you hook up. Consenting to one sex act does not mean consenting to any other sex act. Prior sexual activity or an ongoing relationship cannot substitute for effective consent. Ask every time.

Is free to be taken back at any time At any point during a sexual encounter both partners should be free to change their mind. If one partner changes his or her mind, then the other partner must respect the decision to limit or end sexual contact.

Asking for consent is awkward! Do I really have to ask every time? YES! Effective consent protects you and your partner. You might think you know what your partner is or is not willing to do. You might even be right. Nonetheless, you still have to ask EVERY TIME. Your partner has the right to consent to or refuse a sexual act at any time – including when you are enjoying other consensual sexual activity. If you are not used to asking for or giving verbal consent it may feel awkward at first. Do it anyway! You will get better at it.

>>426046
>It's one thing if you are a 40-year-old having sex with a 13-year-old
There's an age of consent. So if this were to ever happen.. consensually.. I don't think this man deserves to be on the sex offender registry. The girl was part of it too. He should get a fine and community service for breaking the age of consent but he didn't rape the girl. (inb4 people that aren't open minded don't understand this difficult concept of "consent")

They'd better never put me on a jury, because I will NEVER vote to convict a male defendant of any sex crime. I would vote to set Jerry Sandusky free even if they had video of him buggering hundreds of 10-year-olds.

The left has pushed things to the point where the only option left is to reject the criminal "justice" system entirely. If that means letting a complete monster go free, so be it.

>>426092
Oh.. my.. god..

I like the one buttmad liberal that can't believe anyone's insulting his precious perfect feminism

>>426100
16 year old fucking 15 year old is a sex crime, so is if you stumble upon cp on Kazaa or something.

I prefer 10 million children with stupid parents to wander into the street and get killed rather than have a man punished for something like this.

4chan is an imageboard, imagine how easy it is for someone to post an image of child pornography. Now imagine if moot were to report anyone who viewed the thumbnails..

>>426124
>The girl was part of it too.

Nope, girls are always the victim, because they're strong and independent.

>Autism is a hell of a disorder.

A hell of a male disorder. (By definition then, one of the bad ones it's ok to hate).

Amirite?

>>426100

I'd rather each case was looked at without prior predudice either way, but that's way too much to ask those people for.

>>426100
>thinks carlin was saying raping children is better than convicting innocent ppl

It's not an either or thing, retard. They're both bad. Carlin was referring to the cynical over use of "protecting the children" as a political ploy. He was not saying we should let children be abused so innocent people can be free.

To think retards like you get to vote is depressing.

I love being a woman. Especially in this day and age.

Finally, with the protection of the state, we can assume our role as the dominate gender. We can beat the shit out of our husbands, emotionally torment them, even cheat on them and there is nothing they can do about it.

For example, my husband filed for divorce a little over a year ago when he discovered I was having an affair. I wasn't even ashamed when he walked in on me fucking another man, because I was sick of him and his bullshit and his inability to satisfy me sexually. I continued to sleep with my lover for weeks after he found out, sometimes even while my husband was home. He had to listen to us fucking while he slept on the couch. He eventually lost it and smacked me, giving me just the justification I needed to press assault charges and file for a restraining order. Under advice of legal counsel, I cleaned out our joint checking account and froze it and froze our credit cards while he was in jail, to prevent him from being able to afford to hire a competent lawyer.

Yesterday, I was awarded full ownership of the house, custody of our children, 1,450 dollars a month in child support, 3,725 dollars a month in alimony and basically suffered no consequences for being unfaithful. All this for being willing and able to take a smack across the face.

He whined like a little girl to the judge, claiming he had to get a roommate now, because he can't afford to rent an apartment by himself and pay me what he owes me. So pathetic.

Clearly, we are the superior gender.

>>426184
this copypasta is truth, this what they really think

>>426118
>
Must Entail An Uninfluenced, Unimpaired yes Effective consent cannot be established if one person if pressuring the other- this can be physical, verbal or emotional pressure. Influence can also mean the effects of alcohol or other drugs. If someone is asleep, passed out, has consumed alcohol or drugs, or is in any other way impaired, she or he cannot give legal consent.

>he or she
Make that she. If a man and woman are both drunk and fuck, and the woman regrets it the next day, she can call rape and get him sent to prison.

And "I was drunk" would not be an acceptable defense. He would never be able to argue that he was raped in court.

Also, everything you said is pointless unless you have it documented via film or writing in every case, because the female can just deny that any consent was given and 9 times out of 10 the cops/jury/judge will buy it.

>>426184
>Eventually he smacked me.

Why were you married to a retard? Falling for something so blatantly obvious is hilarious.

>>426162
>>thinks carlin was saying raping children is better than convicting innocent ppl

You may possibly be the stupidest poster in /pol/ history, which is quite an achievement.

>>426136
>I like the one buttmad liberal that can't believe anyone's insulting his precious perfect feminism

Almost like the butthut faggot who keeps spamming his OMG the femminists r out to get meeeeee!

Oh wait! That's YOU samefag

>>426184

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liz-mandarano/the-worst-thing-a-woman-c_b_837636.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-t-pisarra/the-easiest-lie_b_1070799.html

>>426207
>OMG the femminists r out to get meeeeee!

With actual news articles and quotes from feminists showing their overreaching in the court of law.

What's the matter, truth too hard to swallow?

>>426201

>>426100
>>thinks carlin was saying raping children is better than convicting innocent ppl

Fixed that for you.
>It's not an either or thing, retard. They're both bad. Carlin was referring to the cynical over use of "protecting the children" as a political ploy.

>>426184
>1,450 dollars a month in child support, 3,725 dollars a month in alimony

>Uses bizarre formatting for expression of USD currency amounts
>because he's a foreigner whose keyboard doesn't even have a $ key

And also it's about 30 times too long and reads like stale copypasta, but those are just secondary levels of proof.

Fail troll is fail.

>>426228

When was the last time you actually had sex with an actual woman?

>>426219

The really great thing about that quote is that it guarantees that any guy who ever rapes Amanda Marcotte will get off scot free as a result, unless there's literal video evidence of him pointing a gun at her and doing the deed.

Of course, this would entail a man actually wanting to fuck one of most unpleasant shrill harpies on planet Earth in the first place, but hell, we elected a nigger president to make ourselves FEEL better ... anything's possible in this bizarro world.

It's all very easy to understand once you see that feminists see every man as a rapist

http://kateharding.net/2009/10/08/guest-blogger-starling-schrodinger%E2%80%99s-rapist-or-a-guy%E2%80
%99s-guide-to-approaching-strange-women-without-being-maced/

>>426261

http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/

>>426162
How to both save children and innocent people:

Get rid of the sex offender registry

I rather innocent people get a fine and a week in jail rather than have their life completely fucked.

Matters are such under this unrighteous combination that how- ever men may laugh at it and make jokes, they do not willingly travel with single unknown female companions in railway carriages. They know very well that for a man to have the finger of a woman pointed at him with a charge of a sexual offence is to secure that man's extinction, no matter what the verdict of a jury may be. In 1881 (Lond. Med. Gazette ) a case was tried in which a girl, to shield 48 herself against her equal share of guilt, charged her partner in it with the crime of rape. The jury could hardly be got to acquit the innocent man even though the prosecutrix had to admit that she never called out, her mother sleeping in the next room, because she was afraid her cries would waken the old lady.

When, however, the bluff is exposed, when the real facts of the case are laid bare to public notice, and woman is shown, not only as not oppressed but as privileged, then the apostles of feminism, male and female, being unable to make even a plausible case out in reply, with one consent resort to the boycott, and by ignoring what they cannot answer, seek to stop the spread of the unpleasant truth so dangerous to their cause. The pressure put upon publishers and editors by the influential Feminist sisterhood is well known.

The above attitude, with all its inconsistencies, has at its back a strong sex-conscious party, or sex union, as we may term it, among women, and a floating mass of inconsequent, slushy sentiment among men. The acquittal of women on the most serious charges, especially where the victims are men, in the teeth of the strongest evidence, is an every-day occurrence.

- "The Fraud of Feminism" (1913), by E. Belfort Bax

>>426290
>We are all retarded here, are you retarded too?

Do you really expect anyone take something that stupid as evidence about anything? It would be the same as if lawmakers used /pol/ to justify their stances.

An easy way to check if you hold rapist tendencies, brought to you by feminism:

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2011/05/18/a-man-is-a-rape-supporter-if/

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/11/penn-state-scandal-was-systemic-failure.html

It's funny that women crying rape were one of the big drives behind black lynchings. Keep up the good work, feminists.

>>426250

Of course you'd say that. It could be your uncanny ability to find the truth by using your amazing deductive skills.

But really it's just that you don't like what's being said and would be inclined to disregard it no matter what.

If some woman posted about how her monster evil husband was plotting to destroy her, you'd be all over getting outraged at that that shit, wouldn't you, Clouseau?


>>426261

Lol. Feminists complain about how men look at them as sexual objects.

A man criticizes their shit.

Feminist response: When was the last time you had sex with a woman?


This comedy writes itself.

>>426305
>http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/shaming-tactics/

That's not an answer. Fuck dude this is 4chan. Even if you're the virgin you sound like you can LIE. Probably an apsie case. Apsie's aren't just bad at lying, but don't know when it would benefit them.

>>426353
kelly says:
May 18, 2011 at 10:36 pm

Virtually every man I have ever know in my entire life fits this entire list to a “T”. Every last one of them.

This is a great post! It should be read to every male on every college campus on the first day of school before they even get through the front door.

>>426373
>Lol. Feminists complain about how men look at them as sexual objects. A man criticizes their shit. Feminist response: When was the last time you had sex with a woman? This comedy writes itself.

They really are pathetic, they don't even see their own hypocrisy.

>>426378
>Women -CHOOSE- to sell their bodies

>>426353
From the bloggers response in the comments section.

With regards to prostitution/strip clubs/etc. I’m not implying that folks in those positions are always women. I think sexual objectification as a whole harms women, even if it’s a man who is turned into a “toy” (since women remain the “sex class,” and objectification of individual men serves to justify objectification of women).

This shit is hilarious.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/essays/all/6391918/whos-the-daddy.thtml

>At a stroke, the one thing that women had going for them has been taken away, the one respect in which they had the last laugh over their husbands and lovers. DNA tests are an anti-feminist appliance of science.

damn them paternity tests

You ever wonder if all the anti-heterosexual talk of feminism isn't being driven by lesbos in the group? Like just because they're women doesn't mean their intrests are the same as other women.

From a lesbo perspective, turning as many women off of heterosexuality as they can means more pussy for them.

>>426373
>This comedy writes itself.

It sure does.
If this is the samefag as someone implied I suspect they aren't a guy at all. Read it's posts. Too over the top and extreme. And now it's implying anyone who disagrees with it is a feminist. If this was a real guy he'd be like the exact opposite of Andrea Dworkin, who was probably a fake herself.

My guess: it's a butthurt feminist who had a bad experience on 4chan and is back spamming shit to make guys sound retarded so she can reference it later: see what women haters they are!

Not that there aren't threads here that would make feminists rage. But this shit is too perfect. It's like a parody of a misogynist.

Dud(ette) try writing novels instead...they pay better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGZIQaCaW0I

>>426452
>And now it's implying anyone who disagrees with it is a feminist.

and anyone who disagrees with you is a pedo/virgin/loser/neckbeard, right?

>>426450

Feminism was started, and has been largely perpetuated since, by lesbians.

>>426484
>the feminist posing as a a woman hater bleats

Is that butthurt I smell darlin?

you guys need to know how to respect women

They need to be protected. Rapists are everywhere. If ten innocent men are imprisoned amongst the hundreds of guilty, then so be it.

>>426501

It's funny you think I'm a feminist doing some kind of double agent shit

It's also funny that you say I'm "Too over the top and extreme", when all I'm doing is reposting what actual feminists have said and done.

>>426415
>Rape is about control and not sex.

That's completely accurate.

So many pedos and misogynists in this thread
Do you guys love defending rapists or what?

>>426353

When the revolution comes? She'll be sought out by someone she's falsely accused, and will be one of the first ones up against the wall.

After the gang rape, of course.

i know you fags like to mock feminism and shit but i hope you know you'd get stomped in a debate with an actual feminist, even the "womyn" kind

PROTIP: rape culture is real, and can be proven to be real with the same accuracy as a scientific theory

>>426576
>mental illness
>mental breakdowns

So these are two problems that women frequently suffer from then. And people wonder why they shouldn't just be told to shut the fuck up and get back in the kitchen where they belong.

>>426437
Sadly, even DNA tests are considered completely irrelevant by many activist American judges. There is a very long list of men who have been unquestionably proven to not be the father, who are still required to hand over mucho cash to the whore every month for 18 years. The courts simply do not care what the truth is.

>>426571
Only sometimes, most prominent example would be war, for some (quite few) people raping is the only way to get off. Then there are countless of cases when the rape is result of a simple misunderstanding and human error.

Rape is a complex matter and the way radical feminists use it to describe everything they consider to be an oppressing element in society certainly doesn't make it easier to grasp.

>>426623
> rape culture is real

That's why men lynch and murder other men who are (usually falsely) accused by women, right

Because men support rape

>>426623
>PROTIP: rape culture is real, and can be proven to be real with the same accuracy as a scientific theory

This is fucking gold

Do they use the same stats for their "pay gap" myth, too? And rape rates?

>>426669
[citations needed]

>>426684

falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/11/penn-state-scandal-was-systemic-failure.html

>>426669
Exactly, they sacrifice an individual to keep the women in check and rape culture alive.

If they really wanted to change the system they would keep the hell away from women, and those who couldn't would kill themselves.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/22/rocrast-mack-murder-alabama-prison-brutality_n_1107687.html

>The patient's limp body spoke to the savagery of an assault that had left deep contusions on his legs and torso, and inflamed knots bulging from his head and face. He was unresponsive, with fixed and dilated pupils, and doctors quickly diagnosed a traumatic brain injury. Only a ventilator kept him alive. He never regained consciousness and died the next day.

>His name was Rocrast Mack. An Alabama prison inmate, his death at age 24 came at the hands of six corrections officers, who took turns battering him with their fists, feet and batons in retribution for a minor altercation with a female guard earlier that night, according to witness accounts and prison records.

Rape culture is scientific fact.

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Plea-deal-ends-charge-stemming-from-false-rape-2
273163.php

>A San Antonio woman who authorities accused of instigating a murder by lying to her boyfriend about being raped has accepted a plea agreement in which she now faces up to eight years in prison.

>Ramos lied about being raped in an attempt to cover up the fact she was two-timing Kelly while he was in jail, prosecutor Miguel Najera said Wednesday. In reality, Najera told previous juries, she had been in a consensual relationship with Ramirez.

>>426683

Maybe the liberals will try to scientifically prove "privilege" too!

Now that's some rape culture.

>>426700
Hmm, 6 guards to beat one guy to death, bit excessive really

>Turns out to be a nigger

Oh, well damn, should have been 12 guards then

>>426771

women raping men is called social justice, reparations for centuries of oppression

And it's not really rape, because as it was already defined, "[Rape] is the physical coercion of a man seeking sexual domination over a woman", period. And he was erect, he clearly wanted it, as all men do.

>>426561

ARE THERE ANY WOMEN HERE TODAY?

>>426753
Wtf...

>>426824

I can define "[Rape] is women who forget to close the fridge at night."

And if I repeat it enough somebody might believe it, but that doesn't make it any more true than your definition. It's a definition made by one group to benefit only that group.

In other words, feminists have said, because only men rape, that men are inherently inferior to women. They haven't defined murder as the act of a man attacking a woman -yet-, but the decade's just started.

Ain't nobody pushing for equal rights with them, son. It's "men are inferior" right out the gate.

>>427026
>They haven't defined murder as the act of a man attacking a woman -yet-, but the decade's just started.

They're already done it for war, and for the financial crises.

(6 year old boys fantasizes playing with her)

>>427189

those disgusting pedos

>>426118

What if she turns around and says her consent was given under duress?

>>426697
>If they really wanted to change the system they would keep the hell away from women, and those who couldn't would kill themselves.

Let's try applying that to other crimes too, shall we?

If they really wanted to change the system they would never steal, and those who couldn't would kill themselves.

If they really wanted to change the system they would never murder, and those who couldn't would kill themselves.

So, do murder and theft culture exist too?

Newsflash:The actions of criminals aren't representative of values most people hold - that's why they're criminals.

And this is why I'm no longer a liberal.

I realized that liberalism is no longer about equality
but revenge.

The feminists and gays want to wreck society out of revenge.