they have to fall sometime

I welcome it .

I want to see WW3, not only do i want to see Israel wipe out the middle east, but the fall of the US would be amazing.

about fraking time.

Israel = parasite
USA= Host
UK= Host
NATO=Host.

I just wonder who Australia would support... we always go to war right behind the US, but at the moment we're China's little bitch, and if China went to war it'd just boost the Australian economy so much, because of China's need for military resources.

http://www.debka.com/article/21453/

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/an-inside-look-at-the-base-where-iran-is-developing-nuclea
r-weapons-1.393920

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/9927381

http://news.yahoo.com/israeli-president-clock-ticking-iran-190647077.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/02/us-israel-missile-idUSTRE7A11BR20111102

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-test-fires-missile-hit-iran-14865603#.TrcIPegaO
rk
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/06/rice-us-should-do-everything-possible-to-bring-down-irans
-government/

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2057210/Iran-ready-war-Tehran-retaliate-Israel-West-attack-nuclear-
plants.html

www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/report-u-k-preparing-for-military-strike-on-iran-nuclear-faci
lities-1.393361

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4144046,00.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iaea-says-foreign-expertise-has-brought-iran-t
o-threshold-of-nuclear-capability/2011/11/05/gIQAc6hjtM_story.html

Relevant links, bitch.

>>233985
RUSSIA - a small condo in the hills
CHINA - a little wooden duck

I see Shia LaBeouf is on the case.

>>233986

What sucks is that the people of the US don't want war its this israel agenda that dragging us. I think there will be a coup before that happens.

Heh and you guys were saying Alex Jones was crazy for thinking that iran and israel with cause WWIII

>>233985
Well fuck you too!
Not like it's a holy land for three seperate religions that created their own societies.

Whats scary is that we might have to the nutcases were right after all.

>>234033
Of course we're right. We were the ones actually looking, is all. Now that it's safe to look, everyone is panicking.

The US public will never support Israel against Iran because too many Iranians in Tehran are too much like us to justify killing. Iraqis are mostly the descendants of filthy nigger slaves so that war was okay, and Afghans are basically made of dirt and Allah, so we're happy to see them die, but Persians are actually people.

>>234023

JIDF detected.

Dude...this era sucks.

>RT
>youtube
>Argentinian
>world government

what a shit board

>>234059
Go back to sleep, Goyam.

Watching this right now. Interesting, we could easily see WWIII.

>>233970
>implying WW3 wouldn't actually SAVE america, much like WW2

>>234013
>coup
>america

lol pick one

This is going to be AWESOME. Muslims are going to die, nigs are going to die, Jews are going to die, liberals are going to die. Just glorious.

>>234155
China, Russia, Iran united against America, Israel, UN?

ITT: Anarchists and MW3 fanatics hoping their go to war, kill black dudes and fuck bitches fantasies will come true. Then they go batshit insane when it never happens.

Neither China nor Russia want to go to war. They'll let Isreal and Iran blow each other to oblivion and laugh.

Expect it to be a 3 to 6 week war at the most

>>234162
If by the UN you mean NATO, then probably.

>>234155

>>234165
>Expect it to be a 3 to 6 week war at the most

I agree with about half of what you say, but that shit is just ridiculous.

>>234174
And that's only if both sides havn't realised nuking each other is dumb because neither would be alive at the end of it to benefit from winning

>>234165

Yeah and Iraq was a 2 month operation and WW1 was over by Christmas.

I don't want to live on this planet anymore

>>234191
Different types of war, guys.

WW1 was a global conflict.
Iraq was a long drawn out occupation because the US was trying fight by rules that didn't apply to farmers and yahoos armed with car bombs.

This will be a military skirmish mostly based around ground forces vs air strikes. It'll be like the whole NKorea vs SKorea where noone else really got involved and N and S just bombed each other for a while before stalemating

>>234199
Sure you do. War will cleanse us of all the degeneracy. After the war we can rebuild with a strong National Socialist state. The world needs this war, its current degeneracy is untenable.

wheres the illuminati reference in this video?

The science revolution was just about to take off again.

whud a dayyyyummm shame.

>>234155

[spoiler]We are going to die.[/spoiler]

Israel attacks iran
Russia declares war on Israel
US ??? Russia
Eu>???

Bow before your new Aryan leaders.

>>234174
Pretty much all wars Israel have been in have lasted about a month because
a)They won that fast or
b) They pull out because only bad things could come of it

WHY THE FUCK IS THE MEDIA SPEAKING FOR THE PEOPLE. oh yeah i forgot.

Israel Attacks Iran
Iran Retaliates with Russian Nukes
Nuclear War across the Middle East
US decides to step out
Jews Destroyed, US thrives again
Thanks to the fallout Oil is no longer being exported from the Middle East
Major advances are made in Alternative Energy's
Whole world thrives

I feel this is something i should worry about. It almost makes me want to skip class.

I'm glad I wasn't browsing /pol/ or equivalent boards last year when North Korea was mortaring South Korea. I'm sure the discussions about it are the same as this
>LOL BEST COREA BUMBING WORST COREA
>THEYRE GONNA NUKE> GONNA BE GLORIOUS
>LOL AMERICA WILL NUKE COREA. WWTHREEEEE!!!!!!

you kids and your speculation. Countries talk shit. There would and there's could. This is all smack talk all over again

>>234265

Israel is far more dangerous than North Korea.

>>234265
Go to Huffington Post.

The war drums are already beating loudly and you can't even hear them.

>mfw skyrim is delayed because of global chaos.

are you guys really going to stay on 4chan when this happens?

>>234345
of course. gotta stay connected as long as possible to get a good view as it all comes down.

>>234345
Do you have a better idea of what we should be doing?

Actually, I'll probably be on reddit trolling feminists and niggers.

>>234265
If you can't realize what is on the table here, you're a fucking idiot. This isn't talking shit. These fuckers are actually gearing up for war. If other countries get involved, it's very possible to be WW3. This kind of shit isn't even funny to joke about. Do you know the implications of such a war?

creepy, as there is little coverage in msm.

>>234276

>>234345
Well I don't think I'll have anywhere else to go anyway

>>234362
the next dark age, more than likely. mass extinction and a more manageable population for the global elite to run in the future.

an end to our way of life. it's going to be hilarious.

ill be bugging out
see ya
it will be announced of iran nukes on november 8th and the SHTF the 10th of november
we are fucked
PREPARE YOURSELF!
really what do ou have to lose?
read some survival shit

>Russia Today
>Posts as a source

NAW BRO, SHIT'S BULLSHIT

Never trust Russia Today.

>>234362
The US will not support Israel against Iran in a real war. China and Russia will not support Iran in a real war. There's too much to lose and too little to gain to even have a Vietnam style proxy war.

I live in a city 4 hours from my home in a rural area.

I don't have my car with me. Even if I did, the motorways would probably be jammed with traffic in a disaster as everyone flees the capital which is near my city.

If the shit hit the fan I'd have to get out of the city my uni is in and get the fuck home. I'm in the OTC so I'd put on my full military uniform and fucking peg it.

>>234373
http://www.debka.com/article/21453/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/02/us-israel-missile-idUSTRE7A11BR20111102

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/an-inside-look-at-the-base-where-iran-is-developing-nuclea
r-weapons-1.393920

http://news.yahoo.com/israeli-president-clock-ticking-iran-190647077.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/9927381

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/israel-test-fires-missile-hit-iran-14865603#.TrcIPegaO
rk

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/06/rice-us-should-do-everything-possible-to-bring-down-irans
-government/

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2057210/Iran-ready-war-Tehran-retaliate-Israel-West-attack-nuclear-
plants.html

www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/report-u-k-preparing-for-military-strike-on-iran-nuclear-faci
lities-1.393361

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4144046,00.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/iaea-says-foreign-expertise-has-brought-iran-t
o-threshold-of-nuclear-capability/2011/11/05/gIQAc6hjtM_story.html

This good enough for you?

>>234370

It's a great way to start with a clean slate. How else would it happen.

>>234373
yes..

listen to cnn lil goyim

I have asthma. Feels good that I won't be called up and sent to die.

>>234382
none of those are credible sources

>>234404
>reuters
>guardian

OK theguardian is a bit shitty sometimes because they are so up themselves but reuters it alright

>>234402
Yeah, you can just die at home when a nuke hits your city or China carpetbombs your town.

>>234404
>Reuters
>Washington Post
>Yahoo!
>Daily Mail
>Fox News
>TheGuardian

Nigga, you high as shit.

Everyone chill the fuck out.

go to >>>/ck/ >>>/diy/ and finally >>>/k/ to get your survival knowledge download as much info as possible.

best of luck to you.

>>234418
>>Daily Mail

To be fair, they really aren't credible. Yahoo aren't either.

>>234362
Did I say there wouldn't be a war? No I didn't. But nuclear war? No. When nuclear war happens, noone wins. Someone wants to win. So they won't use nukes.

>>234431

So during the final death breath of a nuclear armed country, you don't think they will launch?

>>234413
>Implying China has long range bombers capable of carpet bombing
>Implying China has ICBMs or any capability of delivering nuclear warheads across the globe
>Implying that even if they did they would nuke the rural area where my family lives

London would be fucked. But I would be out of that shithole.

First country to use nuclear weapons gets jumped by.. everything??

Well /pol/, looks like it's time to pull out the old tin foil hat and prepare for the bombs to rain down on us.

>>234446
You imply anyone in their right mind would adopt a "I'm fucked so I'm fucking you too" scenario? If they lose they surrender, they don't suicide themselves.

I'm sure you're just trolling me when you come across as oh-so-serious even though everyone's pretty much cashstrapped to even risk a war.

Oh by the way, if one of the countries nuked, the other, that would be a sign to everyone else to zerg rush them. Everybody in the middle east and surrounding countries hates Iran. Everybody in the middle east and surrounding countries hates Isreal. Whoever attacks the other loses.

http://www.stratfor.com/node/22362/archive/sf_sitrep

Doesn't seem to be much mention of this alleged WW3 staging on stratfor

>>234468
>You imply anyone in their right mind would adopt a "I'm fucked so I'm fucking you too" scenario?
Crazy fundies would, both Christian and Islamic. Good thing we don't have Bush with his finger on the button anymore. People who live for death are NEVER someone who should have a nuke. Israel and Iran are included in this.

>>234552
In my own honest opinion, leaders should be put on psych tests. If they are revealed to be insane or mentally unstable, they should have their nuke codes taken away.

So say there is a nuclear war in middle east will the fallout will be spread by the wind all across Saudi Arabia and then Africa?

>>234578
Yes. It's called a nuclear winter. They'd be no go zones for decades at the very least. It wouldn't be like Fallout. There's enough of that shitty fantasy fodder on the internet as it is

>>234468
Operation Samson, even though Zion "doesn't" have any nuclear weapons.

>>234165
>Expect it to be a 3 to 6 week war at the most

The fuck? I agree China and Russia wont be stupid enough to get involved but that time scale is ludicrous considering how long Israel and Iran have been preparing for war.

The only realistic solution to nukes is:

A) Everybody has them
B) Nobody has them

(There exists an interesting parallel here with the gun ownership discussions in the US)

The fact that only a somewhat arbitrarily/historically decided group of countries is allowed to have nukes divides the world in "haves" and "have-nots" when it comes to defense. Logically, this means some countries will feel that they are unjustly denied a means of protection that other countries do have.

The Israel situation shows this the best, they are the only country in a huge radius that has nukes. Additionally, they are also not known for their pacifist ways. It is only natural that other technologically advanced nations in the area (Iran) would like to install the same deference mechanisms.

Just saying.

>>234610
That's great but we are dealing with the situation as it is.

No doubt right now, country's governments are in political overdrive, communicating between each other to resolve this. America is probably talking to China and Russia, trying to reach a scenario that would stop Iran and Isreal bombing each other.

Or at least they should be.

As much as you anti-semites and anti-mudslime advocates would love to see them wipe each other off the map, the reality is you wouldn't like what would come along after if it became a military free for all.

>>234147
>implying WW3 won't be a nuclear war
>implying anyone wins in a nuclear war

>A) Everybody has them
Yeah because there's some damn stable individuals who've led countries and been in charge of their arsenals.

Can you imagine if all of Africa had nukes? Place would be an irradiated hellhole by years end.

>>234199
After this you probably wont.

>>234628

That leaves B then.

>>234628
dunno why, but i lol'd

>>234628

Pretty much this.

Actually it's a wonder that Pakistan hasn't used its nukes yet.

>>234648
Yeah, screw Israel-Iran, Im amazed Pakistan-India hasn't touched off ww3.

>>234610

Iran would probably sell the Nukes to Palestine

>>234648
Because Pakistan's Islamic Bomb is all but under the direct control of US special forces. They couldn't use it even in retaliation.

>>234468
You forget that most countries still operate a dead man's switch. They wouldn't have to order it, it would happen anyway.

>>234628

>Yeah because there's some damn stable individuals who've led countries and been in charge of their arsenals.

Yeah, not like those stable, trustworthy pacifist nations that have nukes now.

>>234595
What is Operation Samson?

>>234648
I'm assuming that in the pakistan-india-china nuclear triangle Pakistan is the one who would be completely eradicated in case of full scale conflict.

>>234674
Wait, why are you telling me that, that was my point.

>>234682
The plan that if Israel is allowed to be destroyed then suitcase nukes distributed through Europe will be detonated.

>>234703
Wut. I just typed it into google and the first result was a British army forum where someone asked what it means and they said they know but can't talk about it due to OPSEC.
What the fuck, are they Israel's nukes? How the fuck is this allowed to happen? Explain more.

>>234619
I believe this message is more than appropriate for this thread.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jETVUulGwc

>>234700

Ah, ok. My apologies.

>>234721
>>234721
Israel has at least a couple hundred nukes. All I know about Operation Samson is what I told you, and that's probably just an idea cooked up during the cold war and quickly abandoned. I doubt even Israel is crazy enough to implement it.

>"We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: 'Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.' I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.

>>234721
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

Jesus, here, you lazy bastard.

>>234727
Everytime one of those hicks opened their mouths and advocated a nuclear explosion or magic apocalypse because they claimed they've be saved made me facepalm

>>234703
>israel holding yurop hostage

you really think they would do something like that?

Really?!

>>234775
I read that, it doesn't say anything about suitcase bombs in European cities. It just said on -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel- that they reportedly had the technology to miniaturise nukes in 1973.

Operation SAMSON you say?

>>234789
No one's saying anything about "setting up" miniature nukes, We're talking about jewish strategy to launching ballistic nuclear misslies all over the world if something goes wrong for israel.
see >>234758

>>234832
This is why Israel needs an arab spring. They can remove their batshit rulers and ditch such ideas.

>>234848
Fairly certain they voted them to power in the first place.

>>234758

Russia could probably drop several hundred Nukes on Israel before Israel could launch a single nuke

>>234869
I'm certain they would. You never fuck with Russia. If Russia decides you're fucking with them, you might as well slit your own throat for them

Failing that, how possible would it be for someone to stale the nuke codes/deactivate the nuke codes before Russia could use them?

>>234869
You severely underestimate the military might of that crazy little fucked up country. There is only one country that beats Israel in military tech, and that's the U.S. I don't know it we have ways to fuck nukes up in mid-flight without shit going bad, but now is definitely the time when such measures should be in place.

There is no such thing as a post apocalypse. If there is nuclear war, none of us will survive. If you did, you would wish you didn't.

It's time to do the impossible, kick reason to the curb and push off with momentum!

In the event of nukes being fired around, wouldn't they be able to show up on radars? Wouldn't fighter planes be able to shoot them down from a distance should they get launched? Nukes are only detonated by their own detonation charges so shooting missles at them shouldn't make them burst.
Or use EMPS to render them useless so they just drop in the sea or something and get recovered later.

Couldn't SAM systems be used to render nukes useless for launch before they even leave the silos?

>>234957

ICBM's go into space and reenter at Mach speeds well above anything a fighter jet or SAM could do. You'd need to hit them as they are being launched

Something tells me that in the event of a middle east nuclear war the US would backstab Israel

>>234980
But does Israel use those? Only country I know that does is China.
Missle defence systems are needed

>>234999

The US and Russia use them

>>235007
Then Isreal is fucked. It's all about having the first strike to prevent a side from launching back. Though they'd see it coming. This is why nuclear disarmament is needed. Every country hands away their nukes to be disarmed in synch with each other so noone can accuse anyone of trying to take their's away first to make them vulnerable to a nuclear strike. If people want to fight wars, they should do it with guns, not nukes.

>>234957
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnd0qg4I_MM

Has anyone considered high altitude detonations and EMP strikes? Collapse a country without directly harming anyone.

>>235100
Radiation aside, I think collapsing a country generally results in people being hurt by the resulting chaos.

>>235119
But generally kill far fewer people, forgetting that they kill each other afterwards as they return to the dark ages.

It would solve the debt problem which is one positive way to look at it.

>>235100
A hemp blast is the most likely terror attack in all honesty
you would see a grid down situation that would last for a very very long time more than 10 years without power to everyone
PURE FUCKING CHAOS
a very very very very VERY bad way of crippling all of the US

>>235119
radiation would not be a threat learn how a HEMP works

>>235100
EMP strikes aren't feasible and high altitude detonations wouldn't really be practical, for the most part. ICBMs reenter the atmosphere coming down at their targets at roughly 2.5 miles/sec. You aren't going to be able to stop something traveling that fast with any conventional means.

>>235154
nope.avi
an EMP or HEMP creates a disturbance in radio fields that would destroy micro cicuits and microcontrollers
very practical unless something was in a Faraday cage then it would be fine but if not it would be fucked

>>235153
I can't quite work out which scenario would be worse. At least after a conventional nuclear attack there will be millions less people to try and survive.

>>235190
no one would ever be moronic enough to go to war with nukes its just stupid what you see is a MAD situation, i shoot a nuke at you, you see it, you shoot we both die.
politicians may be stupid but they would not do this and all but .000000000000001 percent of the population would survive, so you would just count this as a complete loss so yes THE worst but nothing would be left so why count it.

>>235211

>mfw when the .0000000000001% are the politicians that call the shots.

>>235223
them in their underground antartic seed vault and bunkers
and a few people in areas that were not attacked

>>235223
Yeah and you know what kind of world they inherit once they crawl out.

>>235211
>>235234
I never imagined I'd be saying this one day, but: You overestimate nuclear warheads. If you launched the entire arsenal of the world on just the right spots, ok, you might get a figure similar to the one you gave, but in any realistic scenario, a lot of people would survive, not only on Earth in general, but also in the attacked countries themselves.

>MFW ww3 will be fought over nuclear armaments rights rather than the struggle between major ideologies

We are living in the most bland version of history that could occur.

I was skeptical of this Iran thing becoming any more than a good ol' USA vs Ethnic Guerillas situation, but then I start to see shit like

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/8874073/Russia-warns-against-air-strike-on-Iran
.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFvM_ZoZkN0
translation: Tanks near Sochi (Georgian border) Station

>>235248
A lot of people would survive, but what a shitty life it would be for them. I agree that the previous anon overestimated nukes a bit, but it's all about hitting the right spots. How many things are centralized this days? Water, energy, medical stuff. Lack of basic supplies would kill more people than nuclear blast itself

>>235211
>7000000000 x 0.000000000000001
>mfw 7 millionth of a single person controls the world

>>235329
bf3 for reals

so in three days we can watch the world burn?

>>235381
current status on facebook, pissing self

>>233970
>us Falls
>whole economy goes to shit

yup.

1. Israel attacks Iran.
2. Iran receives lots of aid by the Russians and the Chinese and starts invading Israel
3. Israel goes full Samson.
4. ???
5. PROFIT

Just a friendly reminder of what the future holds:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023790698427111488

>>235410
Iran cannot invade Israel. They cannot invade Iraq and Jordan without getting the US involved, and even if the US stayed out of it (impossible, if they invaded Iraq) their supply lines could not make it across Iraq and Jordan.

There will not be war.

Keeping jacking off to death fantasies /pol/

>>235449

Spec Ops guy here (TF 104):

We are already in Tehran getting the charges ready to take out their core infrastructure and military targets.

>>235499
MOSSAD HERE, YOU WEREN'T SUPPOSED TO TELL THEM YOU FUCKING GOYIM

IDF Commander Here:

We are nearing the end of our predeployment phase of training. Soon /pol/ very soon.

>>235499
Christ sake, Fisher. Abort mission!

>Israel starts shit.
>Amercia blocks out the sky with drones and bombs everything important.

"War" over within a week.

>>235570
That's the likelyhood of it. Try telling that to the rest of the MW/fallout fanatics though.

In actual fact I highly doubt Israel would go full Samson though. Because they like money and when you nuke the whole world, you don't have anymore money to jew

>>235570

But Alex Jones told me that there are american spec ops on the ground and that national guard and army units are getting ready to go over there.

Why would he not tell the truth?

Even /k/ isn't this much of a warmongering shithole.

Wizards Ops Here:

We're readying the dragons to burn their fields and livestock.

>>234552
ladies and gentelmen, remember when we made fun of the philosophical question "If there was a rival space faring civilization, and we and them could send missiles to destroy the other, and the ones attacked couldn't retaliate, what should we do? should we mutually annihilate? should we not shoot?"
And this is why philosophy is important.

>>235638
This is kind of like that place that turns into a depredate shithole because it attracts people with extreme political ideologies and fantasies. You don't see the other boards advocate anti-semitism that much for a start.

It's only natural they go about screaming "NUKE NUKE NUKE". Just ride out the storm and call them out when nothing happens to the degree they're anticipating

>>235604

>ALEX JONES

pfft...HA HA HA HA HA HA

war is the quickest way to true global change.

why don't you want that?

>>234910
a nuke close to another midair nuke and then explode it, the neutrons cause a much weaker air exposion. or traditional explosives that destroy the order of explosion of the nukes charges, preventing it from ever going critical. maybe add in some neutron traps to make it safer.

>>235743
not if it's an ICBM

>>235153
only civilians would lose power, important stuff is shielded from alpha and beta radiation, as well as from EMFs, the heck most consumer goods have some sort of EMF protection (that bump on your laptop charger is various loops of wire, just to keep you safe)

>>235760
elaborate.

>>235802
You must know they fly up into space and reenter quicker than anyone can stop them. Take an ICBM coming back into earth's atmosphere from 100km. It would take only 2 minutes to hit ground. That's a time window that's hard to counter. So you need to hit them when they're still in space with something that home in and knocks them off into space. But I don't know if anything we have can do that.
And what if Israel has ICBMs? And can launch all 200 of them at once. No fucking chance, buddy. Prepare to die

>>235731

>>235825
my original point was conventional explosives or other (tactical) nukes don't have to perfectly hit them, just have them within their blast radius.

say goodbye to 15.5 million barrels per day

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xnSGOLbDt8

to all you faggots that don't know how an icbm works.

The warhead re enters the atmosphere at thousands upon thousands of mph. You can't stop it if its past its third stage. unless those lasers we have are super pimped out since the last i heard about them.

well, i'm sorta glad the US has an amazing airforce and navy.

because we just might have a war where our mainland is going to be attacked.

>>235929
>where our mainland is going to be attacked.

How? Through mexico?

GERMANY WILL START WORLD 3 WAR!!!!!!!!!!!

PROVE ME WRONG!!!! YOU CANT!!!!

GERMANY STARTS EVERY WORLD WAR ON THIS PLANET AND IT WILL START THE THIRD ONE TOO!!!!

>World War

Everyone makes too much money off of each other to kill each other /pol/.

Nothing will happen.

>>235952
just hope no German authority sees this video or thread, get butthurt they won't be able to claim that anymore, and then decide to shoot bio and chemo weapons at every reasonably powerful country in the world.

>>235944

it is mexico.

>>235952
World War 1 wasn't started by Germany

In a Nuclear war, the US has a huge advantage over The Russians and The Chinese.

>>235211
Contrary to what you believe, a nuclear war is very winnable. The entire nuclear warfighting infrastructure in the US is made to fight and win a nuclear war.
The Russians used to have the same philosophy, but lack the weapons systems to employ it effectively these days.

The Chinese model of deterrence is based off of strategic uncertainty, rather than the actual ability to win the conflict.

>>235983
True but would have austria-ungarn have started the war if not for germanys support?

>>235983
Indeed, it was started by a ostrich that a hungry duke shot.

>>235983
it was, nigga, germany wanted it and pushed austria with giving them a letter of attorney

>>235952
GERMANY DOES NOT FORGIVE!!! AND GERMANY HAS NOT FORGOTTEN!!!

WORLD WAR 3 IS COMING!!!! GERMANY IS PLANNING IT!!!

AND ISRAEL WILL GO DOWN!!!! AT THE VERY END, HITLER WILL SUCCEED!!!

>>235929
>mainland is going to be attacked.

No other possible enemy country has a true blue water navy like the US Navy.

So no.

This is what happens when you spend most of our resources towards the military war machine. We don't really have to worry in situations like this.

>>235995
Everyone wanted to blow the shit out of each other in 1914, and not in a good way. It wasn't just the Germans doing the saber rattling. If I remember correctly, I think that Austria-Hungary invaded Serbia which caused Russia to declare war on Austria-Hungary, which caused Germany to declare war on Russia which caused France and Britain to declare war on Germany and Austria-Hungary.

>yfw THAT newsflash finally happens

"ICBM launched suspected of carrying nuclear warheads. Get to your nearest fallout shelter"