| >> |
02/28/12(Tue)06:30 No.1863593>>1863585
"No
crematoria" capable of disposing of millions of corpses? Absolutely
false, the crematoria were more than capable of the job, according to
both the Nazis' own internal memos and the testimony of survivors.
Holocaust-deniers deliberately confuse civilian, funeral-home crematoria
with the huge industrial ovens of the death camps. This is discussed in
much detail in the replies to questions 42 and 45.
"No piles of
clothes"? Apparently, the IHR considers piles of clothes to be "hard
evidence"! This is strange, because they do not deny the other sorts of
piles found at Nazi camps: piles of eyeglasses, piles of shoes (at
Auschwitz, Belzec, and Maidanek), piles of gold teeth, piles of burned
corpses, piles of unburned corpses, piles of artificial limbs (see
Swiebocka, Auschwitz: A History in Photographs, 1993, p. 210), piles of
human hair (ibid, p. 211), piles of ransacked luggage (ibid, p. 213),
piles of shaving-brushes (ibid, p. 215), piles of combs (ibid), piles of
pots and pans (ibid), and yes, even the piles of clothes (ibid, p. 214)
that the IHR claims do not exist.
Perhaps the authors of the 66
Q&A realized that it was dangerous for them to admit that these
piles were hard evidence, because then they would also be forced to
admit a number of other things as "hard evidence." Perhaps this is why
they removed this phrase from the revised 66 Q&A.
If items
were not generally found in mass quantities, it is only because the
Nazis distributed them to the German population. A memo on this was
captured, revealing that they even redistributed women's underwear. |
