Welcome to reality!!

Muslims take words as violence against them

>Charlie Hebdo's editor-in-chief, a cartoonist known only as Charb, said: 'We no longer have a newspaper. All our equipment has been destroyed or has melted.
'We could not put a paper together today, but we will do everything possible to produce one next week.
'Whatever happens, we'll do it. There is no question of giving up.'

Here is to frenchies not giving up.

What do you expect. THANK YOU MULTICULTURALISM I'M SURE GLAD ALL THESE CULTURES ARE HELPING US UPHOLD FREE SPEECH

"Dieu se rit des hommes qui se plaignent des conséquences alors qu'ils en chérissent les causes" (Bossuet)

Charlie supporte l'immigration en provenance des pays du tiers monde depuis toujours.

Faut assumer maintenant.

The more I learn about countries with strong Islamic presence the less I want to defend Islam.

mfw

C'est vrai que lorsque c'est la foi chrétienne qui est caricaturée (toutes les semaines) rien ne brûle.

C'est pas drôle.

C'est un coup du FN pour diviser les français.

Interdisons ce parti de nervis fascistes.

Well, extremists gonna extreme. What worries me more is that people are definitely gonna take the wrong message from this, namely to steer clear of offending Muslims, thereby validating this sort of thing.

Then again, maybe they had it coming.

Too bad all the leftists involved didn't die.
But it's what they deserved.

Ci li siounistes!!!

Ji vou li pitit Zimmour qui parti di journal avant ça broule.

Sale Chouif!

C'est un coup du FN.

NO PASARAN!

EMBRACE DIVERSITY

ERASE THE EVIL UNDIVERSE EUROPEAN ROOTS

Je ne suis pas étonné qu’un magazine laïcard tente de faire des ventes sur le dos des musulmans !”
– Abdallah

Ça peut être l’extrême-droite qui tente de déstabiliser [...] Il est un peu facile de faire le raccourci immédiat entre cette première de couverture et éventuellement des musulmans qui auraient mis le feu à Charlie Hebdo.”
– Karim Zéribi

Faut arrêter de nous faire croire que derrière il n’y aura pas de problème ou de réaction ! Vous savez très bien qu’il y aura une réaction ! Oui ou non ? [...] Pour moi la liberté d’expression, c’est de la flûte.”
– Nassim

>>166830
Les déclarations des musulmans sur l’incendie c’est un florilège !!!

On prend bien conscience du coté “modéré” de 99,9% des musulmans “de” France

>>166830
>that feel when you can't read ribbit-speak even after all those years of french class in canada

http://www.streetpress.com/news/9607-charlie-hebdo-forsane-alizza-en-kif-apres-l-incendie

Les membres du groupuscule islamiste Forsane Alizza – surtout connu pour ses vidéos postées sur YouTube – étaient super contents ce matin au moment du petit déjeuner quand ils ont appris l'incendie de Charlie Hebdo.

FACEBOOK Dans une tribune intitulée « Une évidence pour les doués de raison » et signée par l'équipe de Forsane Alizza, les intégristes lancent un appel:

« On recherche les photos (voir sur facebook par exemple) de la famille du dessinateur ( peut être un membre de sa famille décédé, une tombe, une photo d’accident de voiture) n’importe quoi qui pourrait nous faire sourire inchaalah afin de montrer que les musulmans ont de l’humour. Liberté d’expression oblige. »

SIONISTES Ponctué de « snif » ironique, de « crève sale chien » l'article explique que « les provocations ne provoqueront rien d’autre que l’humiliation de ces auteurs »:

« Jusqu’à quand allons nous nous soumettre au diktat d’une bande de fanatiques haineux, qui usent des procédés les plus vils pour faire taire les honnêtes gens récalcitrants à leur pouvoir satanique? ».

Forsane Alliza ne manque pas de rappeler que Charlie Hebdo est « le porte parole des réseaux sionistes en France » et regrette que les actions légales soient vouées à l'échec:

« Cela vaut-il le coup quand on sait que les tribunaux maçonniques les soutiennent bec et ongles? »

Un dernier extrait pour LOLer ou pas:

« La nouvelle religion aujourd’hui c’est le credo d’Auschwitz. Personne n’a encore osé transgresser ce dernier tabou, à tord ou à raison. Mais lorsque les pires islamophobes invoquent la liberté d’expression et se cabrent dans le même temps dès qu’un mot de travers et prononcé sur l’entité sioniste ou sur la shoah, voilà qui est insupportable pour nombre de gens épris de justice, qu’ils soient Musulmans ou pas ».

This newspaper will restart, I have no doubt.

But if they really have a brain, some guts and two balls, it will be no more a leftist newspaper.
It will be a nationalist newspaper.

Goddamn, that's a terrible way for leftists to have the shock of reality hit them

Fucking mozlems..

Source in English?

>>166871
None of those 3 must be killed in Islam.

>>166854
>a brain
>nationalist
MISMATCH MISMATCH MISMATCH

>>166885
stop takyah please.

>>166885

According to many actual muslims, they must. Pic related.

>>166888

>a brain
>cultural marxist
>2011

**ERROR: BRAIN DEVICE NOT FOUND. PLEASE INSERT A BRAIN AND RESTART.**

>>166906
Im not denying my faith?
>>166908
They are wrong.

>>166888
LEFTIST LEFTIST LEFTIST

>>166917
>2011
>mouthshitting "cultural marxist"
ISHYDDT

They deserve it for spewing hate speech against an oppressed minority. What worries me is that some might take this as an excuse to generalize Muslims.

Allah will not ne mocked.

>>>166920

Doesnt matter if they are wrong, this is what majority of muslims actually believe, so they must be stopped. No true scotsman fallacy - I am not talking about Islam, but actual muslims.

And are they? Tell me what is the appropiate punishment for a married muslim woman convinced of adultery according to Sharia Law.

>islamic terrorists attack something
>people act like all mulims are collectively responsible
>anti-islamic sentiment alienates moderate muslims from mainstream society
>TERRORISTS WIN

>>166935

2/10

>>166953
this.

>>166920

And they would say you are wrong.

c'est la faute a la france d'accepter les immigrants les plus extremistes

mais il faut garder a l'esprit que les blanc se convertissent aussi a l'extremisme, ce n'est pas que la faute aux immigrants

vous les attardés mentaux qui blament les musulmants, vous devriez vous concentrer sur arabi saudite, c'est eux la cause de l'extremisme en europe

>>166722
>wich
>laugh of
>christianism
>theu

Are you serious?

>>166920

So it's cool for a non-Muslim to lie about their faith to avoid persecution in a Muslim country?

>>166953

I agree. We must separate fundamentalists, which make only cca 40% of the muslim population in the west, and 50-80% in the middle east, from moderate and liberal muslims. They are our ally.

Celebrate diversity.

>>166952
The punishment is lashing.

>>166983
Your numbers are quite a bit off. According to your illogic, about 50 to 80 percvent of the US population would be fundamentalist Christians. Same number in Italy, 40 percent for every other Western country.

>>166996

If you think that it's okay to have the death penalty for apostasy, then you are not really a moderate.

>>167009
Yeah, and if you're going to church on any day except Sunday, you're already a fundamentalist flat-earther.

>>166992

Thats for unmarried adulterers. From Wikipedia:
In accordance with hadith, stoning to death is the penalty for married men and women who commit adultery. In addition, there are several conditions related to the person who commits it that must be met. One of the difficult ones is that the punishment cannot be enforced unless there is a confession of the person, or four male eyewitnesses who each saw the act being committed. All of these must be met under the scrutiny of judicial authority[123] For unmarried men and women, the punishment prescribed in the Quran and hadith is 100 lashes.[124]

DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGHT
DIVERSITY IS BEAUTIFUL

>>167019

The difference is that going to church on Tuesday doesn't hurt anyone, it isn't inherently coercive.

Astrology is just as insane as any religion, really, except that it doesn't hurt anyone. That's the whole point, if it's hurting people for no reason, it's not good.

>>167022
Actually the lashes are for married or unmarried.

The hadith is incorrect as it contradicts with the quran, and the quran always overides the hadiths. The quran has no mention of stoning.

>>166996

Those numbers of western (british) muslims are mainstream statistics from opinion polls published even in leftist newspapers:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/jan/29/thinktanks.religion

For the numbers for world muslims, scroll back for alreay posted opinion poll.

>>167019

wut. Are you comparing going to church to agreeing with stoning or killing apostates?

1/10

>>167047

Well maybe.. If you dont convince majority of your fellow muslims to stop following fundamentalist hadiths, it does not matter. Just like with christianity in the middle east, if the followers subscribe to fundamentalist interpretations, its does not really matter what is in the holy books.

As Gandhi said - I like your Christ, but I dont like your christians.

>>167072
They are the uneducated masses.

Better islamic teachings would aid them.

Islam is a religion of peace.

>>167087

Stoning is going too far, but lashes are just the ticket?

>>167100
Stoning is false.

Lashing is the punishment for adultery. Rightfully so.

>>167117

And modern man knows that this is an absurd position to hold. You never, ever use violence in response to nonviolence. You don't beat someone up for having pre-marital sex. You don't blow up a building because you're butthurt at some insult. It's childish, and that's about the most generous term I can use for it.

>>167048

you can't really describe someone as a fundamentalist just because they support some form of sharia law, we need to know if they support a moderate or extreme form of sharia

given the current financial crisis I can't really blame a muslim for supporting shit like sharia economic laws

>>167149
What other way to punish and deter adultery than lashings?

I only somewhat condone this forebombing. They cannot get away with attacking islam, but i dont believe burning the shop down is the right solution.

>>167153

If only we had the degree of economic success and innovation we see in Muslim nations.

>>167153

From the article:
"Nearly a third of 16 to 24-year-olds believed that those converting to another religion should be executed.."

>>167166

You divorce or dump people who are adulterous.

And you ignore people who engage in premarital relations, since there is nothing wrong with it.


And they can get away with attacking Islam. That's the point. If we use our words, you respond by ignoring it or responding in kind. If Islam is of any use at all, it can stand up to criticism. And if it can't stand up to criticism, then it's of no real use.

>>167166

>lashing for adultery is OK
>they cannot get away with attacking islam

Maybe you dont agree with stoning, but your opinions are still VERY far from acceptable for a member of the western society. And that you speak of yourself as a moderate speaks volumes about muslims.

>>167190
Well they will divorce.
But dulterers do not care much for divorce and break ups. Punishment is what is required.

>>167194
I do not care what westerners find acceptable. I disagree with stoning and killing apostates. I agree with lashing of adulterers.

thats it. I am voting nationalists. anything to stop this madness.

>>167194
until fairly recently we were beating kid for petty misbehaviour and plenty want to bring that back

it wasn't that long ago the pythons received death threats from christians over a film that didn't even make fun of christians

>>167215

So you don't have an opinion on premarital sex?

And you really disagree with the Quran when it comes to apostasy?

>>167170
so a minority of kids going through their edgy rebellious phase

>>167224
Christianity has become a walk over. It needs to regain its strength.

>>167228
Premartial sex is adultery.
>And you really disagree with the Quran when it comes to apostasy?
No, i agree with it, because the quran does not mandate killng apostates.

>>167229
Like /pol/ and their "libertarianism".

>>167230

>only one group are still acting like barbarians

>>167216

The same here. If I have to choose between islamic theocracy and fascism, then fascism it is.
Asians can stay tough. ;)

>>167240

But what is the problem with premarital sex? Why is it wrong? Who does it hurt?

If a man and a woman have sex without being married, what crime has been committed that warrants whipping them both?

>>167230

Fucking. This.

There can be no peace with these scum.

The Christians got it right the first time.