>>6987but i did go over this already
the
site has broken even since some time in 2009, after that washington
post article with the "$20k in debt" figure came out. those were bad
days.
the big thing is 4chan's ad revenue does not scale with
traffic. we could double in size tomorrow and our operating costs would
double, but the ad revenue would be incremental and barely inch higher.
i'm
concerned that bringing a new server online next month will jack the
bandwidth bill and make things significantly more expensive, but i'll
figure out a way to work through that
as long as 4chan breaks
even i'm happy. i've never run it like a business and still consider it a
hobby project. as long as i have a computer and internet i'm pretty
much taken care of