Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳

  • File : 1326332626.png-(449 KB, 600x750, corporatism_by_libertymaniacs-d3iwft5.png)
    449 KB Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:43 No.1087092  
    Why do liberals(corporate fascists) think that this current corporate fascist system that they(and republicans) created over the years is in any way a free market?
    Why are they so dumb, ignorant and blind?
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:45 No.1087113
         File1326332734.jpg-(7 KB, 241x251, 1267072840932.jpg)
    7 KB
    >Implying it isn't the inevitable outcome of any "free market"
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:46 No.1087129
    The Deviantart watermark makes this thread a 10/10.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:46 No.1087133
         File1326332799.png-(22 KB, 595x475, Political_ThisImageWasMadeByAB(...).png)
    22 KB
    No true scotsman.

    There has never been and never will be a 'free market.' There are negative externalities, monopolies, irrational behavior, Human error, and regulations of one kind or another. Always.

    Also, liberals being fascists. Cute trolling. You mean Democrats and Republicans. Liberal has liberty right in the name. It means favoring individual liberties. Democrats are usually socially liberal but politically conservative.
    >> op 01/11/12(Wed)20:47 No.1087139
    >>Implying it isn't the inevitable outcome of any "free market"
    >implying this bullshit didn't start when "progressives" and other socialists got power and started changing the system.

    >implying we didn't have a mostly free market for the greater part of the history of the usa
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:47 No.1087144
    OP sux a million dicks for mass assumption making.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:47 No.1087146
    >>1087092
    >Why are they so dumb, ignorant and blind?
    there is irony everywhere in your post OP
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:47 No.1087147
    I am pretty sure that you could have fit at least one more buzzword in there, try harder
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:49 No.1087172
    >>1087133
    >Cute trolling.

    Why in the fuck would I be trolling, they literally want Obama to be supreme ruler of the united states. Some of them we're confused that an election is coming up "what you mean obama might be taken out of office durrr".
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:49 No.1087182
    >>1087146
    Cool no argument, idiot.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:50 No.1087188
    OP is 100% right.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:55 No.1087267
    We don't think it's a free market. We don't want a free market. We don't want a command economy either. However, we don't want this mess that the retards in Washington have created over the years.

    Why are you retarded?
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:56 No.1087281
    >>1087147
    Corporatocracy, sheeple.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)20:59 No.1087324
    >>1087139
    >>implying this bullshit didn't start when "progressives" and other socialists got power and started changing the system.

    Progressives and socialists have been in power since the 1800s?
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:00 No.1087346
    >>1087267
    >We don't think it's a free market.
    HAHAHAAHHAHA

    >CAPITLAISM HAS FAILED HERPHERP
    >BUSH WAS A SUPER FREE MARKET GUY


    >We don't want a command economy either.
    Yes you do, you blatant liar. Look at all your policies.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:02 No.1087380
         File1326333723.jpg-(8 KB, 183x275, mlkcultists.jpg)
    8 KB
    >>1087092

    Indoctrination. When you spend your entire life in the hoity-toity "Hahhvahhd University" getting your degree in Afro-Chinese Lesbian Feminism, you will enter the world at the top, but completely oblivious to reality from your ivory tower and too used to groupthink to change.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:03 No.1087407
    >>1087380
    People who have never had an education.

    /thread
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:05 No.1087431
    >>1087324
    More like 1900s, fgt.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:06 No.1087450
    >>1087346
    >Bush
    Bush was yet another politician looking after corporate interests in DC.

    >Yes you do, you blatant liar. Look at all your policies.
    Not really. I want an economy that encourages competition and business with a government that provides support and services for its populace via social programs. These two aspects are not mutually exclusive, look at a country like Germany.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:07 No.1087457
    >>1087407

    0/10

    This thread isn't over. You are the type I mentioned in the previous post. You believe so much in "education," yet everything you "learned" has been from a postmodern/Marxian perspective. Read some classics, read some retro books on history, philosophy and politics, then we can talk. Once you've realized that "education" at a university doesn't necessarily do much for you besides letting you vividly see one side of the argument.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:09 No.1087483
    >>1087380
    It's funny because you're much more likely to get a one-sided indoctrination if you get your education from the internet.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:10 No.1087507
         File1326334247.jpg-(5 KB, 204x128, donttreadonme.jpg)
    5 KB
    >>1087483

    I'm not getting my education from the internet. I go to a university, read classics and history for myself in my spare time, read news, surf political forums, research things that interest me. I'm thinking outside the boxes. Stop trying to force me into one. You can't.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:11 No.1087520
    >>1087457
    > implying half the fucking faculty isn't comprised of Conservative Party Members
    > implying Queens Youth Conservatives isn't the biggest political organization on campus
    > implying I'm not a part of the QYC

    Eat a dick.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:15 No.1087575
    >>1087507
    >I'm thinking outside the boxes

    Lol. No, you're probably not. You probably ascribe your beliefs to someone else's political ideas.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:15 No.1087577
    >>1087520

    I'm just suggesting you broaden your reading horizons. You seemed to be invoking the university education=intelligence fallacy. If you truly are a fellow conservative, I apologize for misunderstanding your position.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:15 No.1087589
         File1326334551.jpg-(24 KB, 438x450, orry.jpg)
    24 KB
    >>1087507
    >I'm thinking outside the boxes

    Sure thing, buddy.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:16 No.1087597
    http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2011/11/dear-left-corporatism-is-your-fault/

    We told you this would happen, but you wouldn’t listen. You complain, rightly, that regulatory agencies are controlled by the very corporations they are supposed to constrain. Well, yeah, we told you that would happen. When you create power—and you people love to create power—the unscrupulous seek to capture that power for their personal benefit. Time and time again, they succeed. We told you that would happen, and we gave you an accurate account of how it would happen.

    You complain, perhaps rightly, that corporations are just too big. Well, yeah, we told you that would happen. When you create complicated tax codes, complicated regulatory regimes, and complicated licensing rules, these regulations naturally select for larger and larger corporations. We told you that would happen. Of course, these increasingly large corporations then capture these rules, codes, and regulations to disadvantage their competitors and exploit the rest of us. We told you that would happen.

    It’s not rocket science. It’s public choice economics. You recognized, rightly, that public choice economics was a threat to your ideology. So, you didn’t listen, because you didn’t want to be wrong. Public choice predicted that the government programs you created with the goal of fixing problems would often instead exacerbate those problems. Well, the evidence is in. You were wrong and public choice theory was right. If you have any decency, it is time to admit you were wrong and change. Stop making things worse.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:16 No.1087605
    >>1087575

    >Implying that one must invent completely new political ideas that nobody else agrees with to truly think outside the box

    Actually, I come pretty to close to just that, based on what people think in this day and age.
    >> Anonymous 01/11/12(Wed)21:27 No.1087772
    >>1087597
    FUCKING THIS


    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]