Moderate master race here

I can mock both authoritarians and libertarians

took this a few weeks ago.

>>105840
wow. How is anyone THAT moderate???

>you have to pretend to be hitler to get y > 0
>every politician is in the top right quadrant even though they probably never took the test
nope

>>105825
>>105847
I just ordered a book by Chomsky. Guess Ill enjoy it more than I thought.

I'm ok with this.

>>105854
I actually form my opinions independently for every issue without thinking "If I support X is must also support Y"

>>105890

going to read about Peter Kropotkin.

fancy that

Conservative Party supporter UK.
Consider myself a Thatcherite.

I am anonymous.

>>105865
You can get some Chomsky lectures on audio Propaganda & Control of the Public Mind is good I downloaded it online

u jelly?

-2.62, -2.00

>mfw when I'm almost identical to Nelson Mandela.

>mfw I have no face

And everyone else was a faggot

>>105983

Augusto Pinochet is that you?

>>105985
Nelson Mandela
>dat Terrorist

>>105825

Absolute Liberty for all master race reporting in.

>>106031

thank you for not being a fucking idiot

Ghandi was an Authoritarian

Adam Smith reporting in.

Pretty much exactly what I expected

>>106065
Brofist

>>106081

Brofist.

It is funny how these threads change so much. earlier on it would have been most people in the green square.
Americans,americanseverywhere.jpg

Interesting. This will be my first political compass since I started considering myself a conservative. Should be fun.
Unfortunately, some of these questions are bad. We need a neutral option. For instance, "the rich are too highly taxed". I think the rich are taxed just enough. Yet if I say I disagree, the test will assume I mean I want them to be taxed higher.

can anybody tell me what ideology am I?

I remember we did this on /sci/

Everyone was in the green quadrant, and when plotted everyone followed a curve that went from the lower left to the upper left of the purple quadrant.

>>106146
libertarian socialist

>>106146
nelson mandela

By the way, this was my result prior to entering into school and becoming an economics major.

Nelson Mandela here, feels good man.

>>106131
>>106131

No. You disagree. Because you do not agree that the rich are too highly taxed or should be taxed more.
Don't see how the test doesn't reflect that.

>>106146

Regular socialist statist.

>>106172

Less regular socialist statist.

>>106146
faggot

Here is the political compass from the OP but with clear dots.

anarco-communist master race reporting in

It is good to see that there is diversity on /pol/, I respect everyone opinion here even if I'm on green quadrant. This thread has potencial.

>>106206

>no purple box examples

>>106184
NOPE.jpg

pic related

>>106198
>Regular socialist statist.
But the only thing i agree on with socialism is the economic shit.
Otherwise i hate the idea of multiculturalism and all the other leftist crap

Ohai. True believer (in freedom), master race.

>>106206
>neo Liberalism
>right
Not really.

>>106207

>that feel when your political ideals will never happen

...

Certainly more left than I thought I'd be

Mind you I just guessed on a good number of questions because I either really didn't have much of a side to take or wasn't quite sure what the question was asking

A "Neutral" option would have helped

>>106198
Nope.

>>106172
is closer to a right libertarian/anarcho-capitalist than anything else.

Yep, I'm a conservative now.
This is what you've done to me /pol/

>>106265
>>106255
>>106207

I dont want to be condescending, but how old are you guys? I want to see if the stereotype is true that all anarchists are kids.

I was an anarchist when I entered college. I cant say that my values have changed, but I dont consider myself an anarchist. After hanging around the whole thing seemed kind of silly.

>>106207
brofist.jpg

Only compassionate person so far.

>>106294

I would rather live in a stateless socialist society then in the current system, and i find socialism to be quite vile itself. fuck the state.

>>106282

I dont really feel like an anarcho-capitalist. Liberty is the anarcho capitalist around here and I hate him.

Anyway, I believe in things like limiting pollution, health care, welfare. Public subsidization of education. I feel a lot more liberal than what my graph makes out.

>>106294

31, Faggot. Trotskyist.

At least I'm not a commie swine.

>mises more authoritarian than hayek; freidman more libertarian than both; rand more libertarian than all of them
Political compass is such a joke.

>>106347

that is what I was thinking, rand was a republican constitutionalist not an ancap

>>106330

B-but trotsky wasn't anarcho-communist.

Don't mind me.
I'm just gonna leave this here

I think we are all missing an important clue to this chart.

All the Jews are on the bottom half.

I placed near margaret thatcher.

>>"The businessperson and the manufacturer are more important than the writer and the artist."
>>Strongly Agree

>>It is a waste of time to try to rehabilitate some criminals.
>>Strongly Agree

>>In a civilised society, one must always have people above to be obeyed and people below to be commanded.
>>Agree

>>The death penalty should be an option for the most serious crimes.
>>Strongly Agree

>>Results:
>>Libertarian Leftist

wut?

I identify as a libertarian socialist/left anarchist. I'm 26. I agree that there are some idiots involved but that's true of any political persuasion. I see it as a direction to move towards rather than "this is exactly the society i want right here, right now"

According to that picture, George Bush is more authoritarian than Mugabe and just as authoritarian as Stalin.

>>106371
Chpoin i am dissapoint

>>106391
This

Political compass is a fucking joke

>>106373
It's because they are running away from Hitler and Stalin...

Purple master race

>>105998
It's funny to see how few Randroids appear in these threads, with maybe the exception of this fagget, that obviously rigged the test
>>106031

>>106404

Just because he wasn't successful in implementing all of his ideas, doesn't mean he doesn't have more right-wing authoritarian ideas. Anyways, see pic. Why the world is going to shit.....

>>106357
Not who you were talking to but he was (before joining the revolution) a council communist which isn't all that different form collective anarchism/libertarian socialism

>>106451
>>Thinks world is going to shit
>>Uneducated faggot that would say the same thing in whichever generation was born
>>Mad because world leaders are not stupid pseudo-anarchist college kids

>>106448
>all libertarians are randroids
[Citation needed.]

Seems about right.

Like my dick.

Slightly right, all the way down and purple.

>>106479
I thought that Libertarians on the left were anarchists, and, on the far right, were Randroids. Isn't full individualistic freedom the base of Objectivism?

>>106478

So all of our world leaders are right-wing authoritarian ie traditional and you think that's intelligent? Who's dick are you sucking why they feed you their politics?

>>106492
>>2 inches long

centre economy, very far down on vertical axis.

So many fucking hippies in here. If you're green, go back to Reddit.

Gandhi and Dalai Lama represent!

>>106501
Someone's mad because socialism failed to more intelligent and realistic models of government

>implying it's even possible to have a penis and be that inconsistent

Indeed

>>106521

So are you going to argue that the US, and the world, wasn't more successful from the 40's to 70's when the leaders were left-wing authoritarian? That Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy weren't better Presidents than Reagen and Bush? Lmao, kid. That's how we ended up in this shithole.....

>>106494
It depends on who you ask. Market anarchists are so far right they're left. Rothbard thought libertarianism was farther left than leftism.

You know how I know this test is bullshit? Because self-proclaimed socialists are getting green instead of red.

>>106451

>>No one can feel naturally homosexual.
>>I can...

>>106548
>>So far right they are left
wut?
That's fundamentally wrong man

>>106555

Actually, you are naturally a homosexual. What is unnatural is that you're closeted.

>>106576
Think of it like a circle.

>>106521
Are you refferring to the Soviet Russia or Maoist china? Or both.

1. neither of which are socialist
2. China seems to be doing o.k.

time for bed. too many people who don't know shit about history or politics

>>106576
>>106595
Do you mean the Horseshoe Model?

>>106547
Define successful.

The post-war era along with the cold war made people work way harder than today's easy-going world, so we are just reaping out their hard work, but I'm sure that if you define "world success" by socioeconomic indicators like world famine, alphabetization rates, HDI indexes and whatever else you choose, the world is more "successful" today.

This test was dumb.

>>106599
>Explore own people to attain maximum nationwide profit over personal liberties

Great government man, I hope everyone follows China path someday

>>106553
>someone got an answer they didn't like
>doesn't know shit about socialism

>>106347
>>106391
Yep.
There are lots of better political tests than political compass. http://politicaltest.net/ for one

>>106599
China isn't socialist though.

>>106547
>>106618


Status:
[ ] Not Told
[X] Told

>>106553
But socialism isn't communism...
Look, the axes represent freedom, equality, and order.

Has anyone else noticed how difficult it is to get in the blue or red quadrants? Obvious bias is obvious.

>>106672
Of course they are. You will be banned from /pol/ from saying that.

Stating the (truth) obvious about China's economical model ruins all the socialists wet dream in here that "because China is socialist, it will, someday, be the world greatest superpower"

>>106618

I was just drawing a contrast between the God-tier liberal Presidents that can be judged by their rankings in history placed by their accomplishments; and the shit-tier Republican Presidents that have dominated US politics since LBJ, another top 10 President.......

But if you're really going to say that the world is better off today, then it was, say, 30-40 years ago, you're going to have to provide sause for that. And I'm not talking about the fact that we can play x-box here.......

>>106685
If the government controls any means of production, its close enough to at least get you in the red. Funny how it doesn't work like that or the right side..

Any Libertarian Socialists/Left Libertarians up in this place?

>>106730
Only with a lack of any democracy. And by government i think you mean state.

>>106734
Yep

>>106711
>>That's how we ended up in this shithole.....
You're gonna have to delete your post then...

>>wants sauce
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-11/05/c_13591648.htm
The "worst" performing countries, that actually got involved in civil wars, epidemics or other general african bullshit had their HDI increased only "slightly". So, yes, even in the most fucked up places of the planet, we are more successful now than ever.
Deal with it, as this is supposed to be a thing to be happy about.

>>106711
Also, presidents doesn't matter THAT much to overall progress of humanity. They can make big decisions that will affect all of the world, but, generally, only on short or short-mid term basis.
The only real way to fuck everything up would be to do some retarded shit like setting of the missile crisis, but no-one is really that stupid.

>>106783
Never heard of tyranny of the majority?

>>106205

I scored about there. Slightly left of center, both socially and economically.

>>106833

>The only real way to fuck everything up would be to do some retarded shit like starting the Iraq War and giving a tax cut to the rich as a way of paying for it.

Fixed

>>106840

yes. but your assuming decisions aren't made on consensus and that private wealth can create a private tyranny of the minority.

>>106863
That still doesn't fuck EVERYTHING up.
Stop whining about your state of relative deprivation. If have grown so used to being spoon-fed by the government that now that you have to get your shit together you can't lift your fat ass over your pseudo-political stance chair and pursue higher education or a real job.

FRIEDMAN, BITCHES.

>being an edgy leftist
>2011

Answer me this question /pol/

>The technical progress brought more misery than benefit to the world.

There is only a single possible answer, and if you get it wrong, you must leave 4chan immediatly.

I've only seen one person anywhere near my point.
>Forever alone
In other news, I fucking love where I am.

>>106669

>>105983
u mad, son?

>>106669
>>You are a democratic National Liberal. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 64 percent are more extremist than you.

3%? Master Race!

Anarcho-capitalist here. This test is bullshit. Nearly everyone's result is green or purple, and my y-axis (libertarianism/ authoritarianism) got all fucked up just because I disagree with socialism and government intervention. I'm far more libertarian than this.

>>106990
>>not seeing the correlation of people who browse /pol/ and their political sense

I don't think the test is ALL that bullshity, I just think most of people here are like that.

>>106940
There are several people in this thread who placed near you.

>>106781
>>106737
>>106734
>>106314

An ordoliberal? Are you shitting me?

>>107020
Just looked that up. It actually sounds like the best way to go.

>>107032
Yeah, but everyone always calls me a fascist around here. Then again, California doesn't know shit about poltics, so...

>>107067
>fundamentalistic - 14%
>not at least 60% secular

center green representing

I wish I knew which country's majority is closest to my views.

>>107125
>USA
picture related

>>107125
The Land of Oz

>>107125
Failed Euro welfare mirages

purple confirmed for jew tier

>>107120
Do you have a problem, infidel?

'Sup guys.

>>107205
Ah, a faggot.

>>107194
Only tier free of kike influence is Jew tier? You stupid?

"National Liberal Democrat"

>>107205
I am a "Cosmopolitan Democratic Socialist". Huh.

"NeoLiberal Democrat"

What is this

Represent.

>>106669
>You are a Trotskyist.

Well fuck...right on the button.Nice

>>107422
>>107422
Yeah, good for you, but it can't adequately differentiate post 1956 political tendencies.

>>107221
>Implying purple master, Ayn Rand, was not a jew

wut

Neo-con master race reporting in

>>107583
56% fundamentalist?
What are you doing on 4chan?

Hurr

http://www.politicalcompass.org/libRightBooks

Where is obama's dot?

>>106031

...You can't be serious...

Western nationalist, pro-White, and relatively free markets.

>>106207

Democratic socialist reporting.
But still, master race high-five, fellow green one.

>>106270

Aw man, even if I'm on green, I think this should come from everyone on the left side of the spectrum.

>>106553
ain't that the fucking truth

>>106553
>Personal and economic freedom are the same
>mfw FagApple
>mfw Microshit
>mfw DRM

>>107838
>mfw I forgot my face

It looks like I'm establishing an orbit, or an escape trajectory.

>>108908
My extrapolated trajectory

>>108908

We green ones have a convert!

One of us!...One of us!...One of us!...

>Putting Adam Smith into right-wing libertarian

lol

My left/right axis changes every time I take this test, ranging from slightly left to the middle of the right, based mostly upon how long it's been since I've heard about some corporate fuck firing 700 people and giving himself a million dollar bonus or seen one of those bleeding-heart commercials about starving kids. I think capitalism is fundamentally a decent principle to work with, at least until we invent robot slaves, but the capacity for people with lots of money to be douchebags is staggering.

My up/down axis is pretty consistent, though. Fuck the poh-lees.

I would revise the system to have the following axises:
✠ up to down: authoritarian to libertarian
✠ left to right: egalitarian to feudal
✠ front to back: cosmopolitan to nationalistic
✠ on to off: radical to reactionary, around conservative
✠ here to there: heterogeneous to homogeneous
✠ before to after: primitive to technological

Since radicalism and reactionism are associated respectively with the Left-wing and with the Right-wing, then their axis can be diagonal.

I did it a while back and got a score close to Mugabe which is ironic.

Revolution R Us

>>112294
Comrade.

This test is so retarded and biased and you're a gullible idiot for believing it.

green > red > lilac > blue

>>113714
I think that everyone here, who did the test, has some sense if it is accurate on oneself or not.

>>113714
Biased towards?

And then you say it has a liberal bias.

Then I say reality has a liberal bias.

Why did you even bother posting?

>>113724
lilac>green>blue>red