>>526795
I think it's hilarious. GTFO.

this is now a long primes thread
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop 7.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	100 dpi
Vertical Resolution	100 dpi
Image Created	2004:02:25 17:32:20
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	800
Image Height	473

>>527774
NOT HUEG/FAST ENOUGH

> f/1.0 is for faggots
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2009:05:02 19:07:57
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	487

>>527734
Take a look at the Sigma 120-300 f/2.8. It's an impossibly huge lens with mediocre image quality and no obvious real-world purpose but seems to be the only thing to fit the bill you're putting up here

>>527709
FFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUU

You in PANDIS?

>>527752
Nah, I just know someone who can't quite tell the difference between a gearhead and someone who has studied photographic art for years and gives me nice and stupid questions :P

NOCT-NIKKOR

>>527775
Fair enough

70-200 is your best bet

>>527762
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Photographer	baZg j00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2009:03:13 21:56:01
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>527766
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Photographer	baZg j00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2008:12:26 00:15:31
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/14.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/14.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>527771

>>527772
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
Photographer	baZg j00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2009:03:12 02:49:43
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Partial
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	10.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>527781
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

someone link that posing .pdf file that was around yesterday, would help this guy alot... alternatively op you can search it yourself it won't have dropped off page 10 yet

I am disappoint with these tits.

>>525308
Your sister is not a lingerie model.

As for poses, go topless, but don't make it all about the boobs, lingerie isn't about showing everything, it's about covering it up just enough.

>>525314

I was too, her nips were weird. She was super nice though, and had a great ass.

>This was taken before I knew anything about photography.
>Image Created 2009:09:07 13:56:54
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>525323


Photoshop resize changed the date? I took it March.

>>525323

I lol'd

>>525308
I know I should sage, yet I am highly intrigued to see where this thread goes.

>>525326

i know.. i'm just fuckin with you :)

lightroom does the same thing.. it puts the image created date as the date you edited it rather than the day you shot it.

the day you shot it is still in the exif somewhere, but 4chon doesn't pull up that part of the exif.

>>525330
Your post took me on a roller coaster of fear.

Goddamn.

post some models!

she looks like she's trying not to laugh.
shooting nudes doesn't go well if your model is too much of an awkward noob to wipe the 'oh-god-i'm-naked-my-boobs-are-showing' look off her face.

bump

>>525363
>>525328

>>525314
What is they were...sizzling?

Honestly I kinda wanna see more from OP's set

I dont think its that bad of a photo

>>525492

Sure sure, you just want more tits.

>>525496

If I wanted to see crooked tits, I'd google it

I wanna see how the others came out if this is supposed to be a "bad" photo

Holy hell
What's wrong with your body & face?
gtfo.

I hope now you know how to not shoot in front of a kitchen with your tripod in the back. That's one of the most distracting backgrounds I've ever seen in a model shot.

i took this two weeks ago, thats a friend who naked model for photographers and artists.
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2009:09:07 17:35:48
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	760
Image Height	1013

>>525522
Redeye and on-camera flash. Nigga please.

>>525526

Better model this time around though.

>>525533
True, but still looks like a camwhore shot.

>>525522

moar?

>>525313
I, for one, would like to see this file. Can't seem to find it though. Any chance of a link?

moar tits
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2005:11:03 21:25:48
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	960
Image Height	630

>>525562
http://www.freewebs.com/enigmaphotos/Pose%20Guide.pdf

>>525573
Wicked, thanks!

This is not art, you have no substance.
This is not porn, I am not turned on.
What, then, is this?

>>525594
>> I am gay in every way.
>> I don't understand the female nude.


fixd

>>525618
Disregard that I suck cocks.

>>525308
This is actually pretty good... better than most of the shit /p/ comes up with

>>525522
She is just an attention grubbing whore, she doesn't know how to handle herself in front of a lens... also is that a popup flash?

>>525379
I disagree. That has its own appeal.

OP. what the fuck is wrong with your models? They dont look like they wanted to pose naked for you. Did you threaten them with rape if they didn't?

>>525308
>>525522
These are both terrible and offensive to naked people everywhere.

They're spank-bank snapshots, not photographs.

I offer creepy-photo as counter.

Speaking of nudes and lingerie, anyone post on Zivity?

>>526287
That's not creepy. That's a staged shoot with too much emphasis on lighting and not enough on a good image.

Like to your site again.

>>526295
Like or Link?

>>526300

I for one would like a link.

www.mikelarremore.com

OP's pic is really growing on me. That chick is a natural poser. Take advantage of it before you piss her off and never see her again. And post more of her. Damn, I want to bury my face in her belly and blow a big PBFPFBFLLLAAAPPP and make her giggle.

>>526308
your and idiot

>>526291

Trap...?

>>526313
Nah, she's just kinda mannish.

Also I'm posting this image again because I like it.

great, more of 5hoe's forced shit, and other faggots licking his ass.

>>526327
mmm, take it! ;]

>>526322

Who is this/Who took it?

>>526336
I took it. Her name is Angela.

>>526339

No your name is Angela.

trap? + "kinda mannish" makes me think MORE trap. . . no?

His name was Robert Paulson.

>>526350

Are you paying any attention? His name is Angela.

>>526322

Great pics dude, do you use a D700?

>>526287

This is a great picture, but there's not wrong with spank-bank pics too! ;)

>>526339

Can you post more work? Not necessarily models.

5hoe, I want to be brosephs and rub cocks =/

seriously, teach me things 5hoez. do you use aimz or msnz or sometihngs?

>>526339
what is the backround lightsource here?

>>526307
Is a link to my website.

Work that is non-model related can be found in the Lifestyle and Travel sections.
Contact information is posted as well.

>>526399
Only if you bring the oil.

>>526404
Background light source is an odd nook in my basement. I have since removed the bottom right light, as per /p/'s advice.

The space was probably used for a painting many years ago and then as a display case for god-knows-what. The house was built probably in 1930 and has since seen several renovations - the last of which was my addition of the hardwood floors to make it into my studio.

>>526411
emailed.

what kind of oil you prefer?

>>526415
Sunflower is nice if you're pale. Sesame if you're asian. And baby if you're under 5".

>>526416
lawlz. erm, to the gmail before I get flamed for asking you camera shit, because you're clearly making more cash at doing this photo thing than I am.

Was the shot of the Duomo taken from Piazzale Michelangelo or the steps on the way up to it?

Just wondering since it is sitting quite high on the horizon from what I remember it?

Without brown nosing any further, nice site.

>>526421
It was from the piazza with a 70-300mm.
The steps don't give you a good angle. But there IS a sweet viewing area once you get up to the top.

what does 5hoe shoot with?

>>526425
Nikon D700 with the 24-70mm f/2.8
Nikon D70 with 70-300 f/4.0-5.6 (old camera)

5hoe is a cunt

>>526450
Your mum.

You're a pretty cool guy 5hoe. I wish I had the initiative to actually take steps to making money from my expensive hobby.

>>525308

There is something incredibly sexy about this girl, but I can't put my finger on it.

>>527333
I agree

She looks just like my best friend's gf. SUPER HOT

>>527333
The hips don't lie

>>526287

>These are both terrible and offensive to naked people everywhere.

>They're spank-bank snapshots, not photographs.

This is the most pretentious bullshit I've read in a while

OP captured more emotion than I've seen in any of your shots, despite the shitty background.

OP = portraiture
Your shots = sub-commercial

>>527359
you're clearly retarded.

>>526291

Also

>They're spank-bank snapshots, not photographs.

And then you post THIS?

GB2 suicide girls

>>527361

>I only like strobist-looking wannabe fashion shots because my knowledge of photography doesn't extend beyond magazines.

No u

ITT: fags getting told

So what all I need is a fugly model, crappy lighting and just take uninspired pictures of her crappy poses to be an artist? Sign me up.

good, /p/, you look kind of cool

>>527398

>fugly model
>crappy poses

With that mindset, you'll probably never be an artist. For art, models don't have to be hot to be good models. Poses don't have to be attractive to make a good photo.

Sounds like you just wanna be a fashion photographer, where "attractive" poses and models matter.

I'm sick of you fags on /p/ who think that fashion photography is the only kind. Go die in a fire.

>>527501

Im cosigning this harder than Ive ever cosigned anything before.

I think tat she is beautiful. She has a real woman's body, not a bullshit anorexic skank figure most of todays "models" do. And she has a beautiful face clear of acne, her hair is amazingly long and shiny too. So all you fuckers out there suck my fucking non existant cock.

>>527778
You sound fat.

>>527778

Are you OP and this is a self portrait? If so, let's sex.

>>527783
You sound retarded

I'd spend the rest of my life with OP's model

Peleng 8mm

>>527718
50mm on crop? Haha, nice joke Anon.

>>527768
/p/'s loev of 50 prime is no joking matter

>>527768

it makes for a nice portrait length.

>>527718
Body + Tamron 17-50 is best cheap kit.

I refuse to believe anyone can be this stupid

Fat dikes?

A little bit too overexposed + too warm. Try to cool it down.

wow sick wtf is this shit fat girls playing grabass

Dedicated camcorder with APS-C sensor that will take EF/EF-S lenses?

They have the technology for it. They just have to put the sensor and lens mount on an XH and charge $6,000 for it.

>>527635

>>527689

Do want.

>>527689
sony have talked about this before with the alpha mount but nothings happened. Since its canon vs sony in the camcorder market whichever makes the move first is gona do well.

>>527759

>alpha mount

>>527352
>dA

>>527735
right, because beethy hasn't already made it massively obvious he's a huge weeaboo faggot...

>>527751

ur fuckin dumb. go back to flickr

>>527757
u mad

weeaboo

>>527757

Weeaboo spotted