[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
Board
SettingsHome
4chan
/p/ - Photography

J-List

Posting mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
reCAPTCHA challenge image
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
4chan Pass users can bypass this CAPTCHA. [Learn More]
File
Password (Password used for deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Japanese このサイトについて - 翻訳

J-List

Toggle

We've made a number of tweaks and feature additions to the inline extension and catalog. You can access the extension by clicking [Settings] in the upper-right, and the catalog by clicking [Catalog] from a thread. Thanks to everyone who participated in the extension feedback thread for the suggestions/bug reports.


File: 1362542690821.jpg-(225 KB, 1949x1536, subway street1o_1949x1536.jpg)
225 KB
225 KB JPG
street photo thread.... post your newest stuff
>>
File: 1362542901445.jpg-(359 KB, 1000x628, Walk New.jpg)
359 KB
359 KB JPG
>>1908378 (OP)
Old but reprocessed. You have no idea how much it bugs me that her feet are cut off.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908385
nice line man.
>>
>>1908385
>street
>posts a digital photo
>>
File: 1362543828146.jpg-(157 KB, 1111x1536, mall floor in the sky__11(...).jpg)
157 KB
157 KB JPG
well take any kind of street ...so long as its new. no hate
>>
File: 1362545718044.jpg-(134 KB, 1280x720, PlayStation(R)Home Pictur(...).jpg)
134 KB
134 KB JPG
does the red carpet count as street?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908385

Something about this is just makes it so pleasing to look at.

Great shot, ignore the aspie trolls bitching about digital.
>>
>>1908413
you don't have to own a film camera to shoot street photography, thats kind of arrogant.
>>
File: 1362547837890.jpg-(478 KB, 999x666, _5A_0192.jpg)
478 KB
478 KB JPG
ugh im so fucking high
>>
File: 1362548610037.jpg-(3.28 MB, 3872x2592, dude new edit.jpg)
3.28 MB
3.28 MB JPG
thats right share the love /pros
not new but one of my favorites from Norwalk ,CT

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908509
>share the love
u mush b nue abound ere
>>
File: 1362549647042.jpg-(674 KB, 1200x801, L1030030-1.jpg)
674 KB
674 KB JPG
not street per-se

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908528
Highlight on the right is very distracting. Too bad the expression of the right woman doesn't cut it for a perfect image, but I think it's a decent shot nonetheless.
>>
File: 1362550701965.jpg-(665 KB, 1200x801, L1030011-1.jpg)
665 KB
665 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362559128833.jpg-(438 KB, 800x546, 4.jpg)
438 KB
438 KB JPG
Fuji Superia 400
>>
File: 1362559174559.jpg-(402 KB, 800x602, 8.jpg)
402 KB
402 KB JPG
>>
File: 1362559227190.jpg-(292 KB, 800x600, 11.jpg)
292 KB
292 KB JPG
>>
>>1908663
lol I can spot that homeless guy you posted in another thread
>>
>%Name %Lastname photo

Now on /p/. My body is not caring.
>>
>>1908528

Very nice shot. Highlight on the right is not distracting, it matches the skin of the woman.
>>
File: 1362561496449.jpg-(268 KB, 1000x667, Frame023.jpg)
268 KB
268 KB JPG
im so street
>>
File: 1362561667324.jpg-(325 KB, 800x534, Frame035.jpg)
325 KB
325 KB JPG
>>1908692
so street

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362564898953.jpg-(626 KB, 1000x667, IMG_2173.jpg)
626 KB
626 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362565261126.jpg-(418 KB, 667x1000, IMG_3530_1000.jpg)
418 KB
418 KB JPG
Taken yesterday.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
why are almost all street photos either

close ups of random people
shots of peoples back
people doing mundane things
sideshots of people walking
>>
File: 1362568747768.jpg-(525 KB, 1000x666, DSC00026.jpg)
525 KB
525 KB JPG
le tilt and shift face

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362570099750.jpg-(122 KB, 1000x601, durty-3.jpg)
122 KB
122 KB JPG
>>
File: 1362570145449.jpg-(442 KB, 1000x718, nohome-0448.jpg)
442 KB
442 KB JPG
>>1908764

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362570348753.jpg-(1.42 MB, 1544x1024, 16040016.jpg)
1.42 MB
1.42 MB JPG
>>1908528

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908742
>Implying there's anything more to life
>>
File: 1362570876957.jpg-(753 KB, 1000x721, D7000 091.jpg)
753 KB
753 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908742
why are almost all portraits just photos of peoples faces?

why are almost all architectural photos images of buildings.

why are almost all landscape photos just images of nature.

why are you such a fucking retard?
>>
>>1908742
Street photography is very difficult. For every good photo you get 1000+ photos of that mundane, boring stuff.

No matter how good you are, on the street you can shoot like a madman for weeks and weeks without anything that would make an interesting photograph manifesting itself.

And as you may have already noticed, amateurs suck at editing. They can't keep their less than amazing stuff (like every photo in this thread) to themselves. I kind of understand it.. they are just showing the best of what they got and in a genre of photography where getting good stuff is so rare, chances are that their best stuff is mostly bad.
>>
>>1908809
>mostly bad

These photos arent amazing, but they are by no means 'bad', in fact there are even a couple quite good ones.
>>
>>1908509
>>1908528
>>1908547
>>1908717
>>1908719
>>1908743
>>1908766
>>1908778
None of these are street photos.
>>
>>1908836
why not?
>>
>>1908850
Did you even look at the exif? They were all digital.
It is not true to the art form to use digital for street.
>>
>>1908851
2/10

not gona even bother with sage
>>
>>1908859
No, I personally won't even bother rating it...
>>
File: 1362577582774.jpg-(405 KB, 1000x667, IMG_5971.jpg)
405 KB
405 KB JPG
I dont do street photography.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908859
>>1908860
Butthurt because your photo's aren't street photography?
Don't worry, you can still take photos on the street, but unless you are using film they won't be street photography.
>>
File: 1362578757005.gif-(731 KB, 248x193, 1359308154334.gif)
731 KB
731 KB GIF
>>1908873
>>
File: 1362579854578.jpg-(417 KB, 1000x750, CheapShot.jpg)
417 KB
417 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362580200440.jpg-(385 KB, 1000x718, street.jpg)
385 KB
385 KB JPG
>>
File: 1362580246897.jpg-(359 KB, 1000x749, Street3.jpg)
359 KB
359 KB JPG
>>1908906
>>
File: 1362580293554.jpg-(407 KB, 733x1000, Street5.jpg)
407 KB
407 KB JPG
>>1908907
>>
>>1908873
Err, no. Using film or digital is irrelevant. Though it is blasphemous for the street photography experience when one doesn't shoot in black and white.
>>
File: 1362580366110.jpg-(336 KB, 662x1000, Street6.jpg)
336 KB
336 KB JPG
>>1908908
Does this one count as street?
I honestly don't really understand what is and isn't street photography sometimes.
>>
>>1908910
yes, but it's not a particularly strong composition.
>>
>>1908922
tsk, one of the better compos in the thread imo
>>
>>1908910
>Does this one count as street?
>I honestly don't really understand what is and isn't street photography sometimes.
I was going to say street but sucks until I noticed the angels lead down to the woman. The surrealist element is what makes good street most of the time.
bretty gud foto bro
>>
File: 1362581793257.jpg-(875 KB, 1600x1076, 8510149255_bb000abffd_h.jpg)
875 KB
875 KB JPG
Does taking pictures in the city count as street even though you are not shooting people?
>>
>>1908938
no
street needs to be documenting the human condition
>>
>>1908864
pros/cons/crits on this one please?
>>
>>1908955
>documenting the human condition
>just random people walking on the streets doing nothing interesting at all
>so deep
>>
>>1908955

2/10

Sorry.
>>
>>1908864

It is good that you are aware about big DOF but I would prefer the version with small DOF better than yours.

Your photo does not feature any idea and has no value without context. More than that: the combination of objects is suspicious and misleading.
>>
>>1908925
it's busy cluttered, poorly framed and badly timed.
>>
>>1908385
messed around with your pic. hope you don't get mad
>>
File: 1362586214110.jpg-(345 KB, 996x647, Untitled-1.jpg)
345 KB
345 KB JPG
>>1909038

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908987
Pardon me? It's perfectly timed, the lady is directly below the cherubs, which creates a nice line from the top of the frame to the bottom, which is accentuated by the vertical lines of the building.

You must be one of those kids who think everything has to follow certain rules. Good street photography is the perfect example of breaking rules in your favour... Look at any Magnum photographer for proof.
>>
>>1909047
Wrong, kid. That photo should just be deleted. At any rate, street photography is passé as fuck. How does it feel being a kitschographer?
>>
>>1908938
"Street" photography is supposed to be about people interacting with each other and with the environment they are in, and not so much about the actual "street".
>>
>>1909047
face it dude, it's shit
>>
>>1909048
feelsgoodman. You seem like a pretty hip dude, your opinion must be superior.

derp
>>
>>1909050
>opinions
>>
>>1909051
My photos are definitely superior to that piece
>>
>>1908403
>>1908456
Cheers.

>>1909040
I tried something similar and might try and patch it up again. Her having feet really does to complete the shot - bloody annoying.
>>
>>1909053
Lovely, let's see.

>mfw you're just being an autistic cunt an you'll never actually deliver
>>
>>1909054
it's just a moment man, don;t get too bumped up. That's the classic wa a photographer teaches himself how to improve.
>>
>>1909047
>It's perfectly timed, the lady is directly below the cherubs

I love ladies in front of buildings.

Composition there is nice but the photos of building with people walking around them are autismal. I can't think of worse and dumber idea that can be called street photography.
>>
File: 1362588239140.jpg-(69 KB, 646x768, strret canrework.jpg)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
>>1908719
love this the light is awesome.
and this is definetly street.
the tool who is downing everyone's work can stuff it. if its a photo and its candid and on the street its street photography. in fact if its candid and its in public... its street photography. more than half of the critique masters on /p have no actual photographic experience, they're armchair vultures picking on the guys who actually do go out and shoot. and the guys who said that you may shoot hundreds of shots and come up with crap are right . thats how it goes. But, when you get something good, something that makes you stop and go "whoa" it makes all the work worth it.
so shoot film , shoot digital, fucking shoot wet plates... I don't care. just shoot.
one day people on here will learn that although they may love there heroes work,be it HCB, or Webb , or whoevers stuff grabs you by the short and snarkleys, you don't have to be them to shoot street. hell that's what photography is about finding your own thing.
and anyone who dosen't embrace changes in technology is a jack ass. learn every medium you can possibly get your hands on.
Ok I'm done raging now.
More pictures!!!
>>
>>1908938
I feel that's more architectural photography than street photography. I tend to think of street photography as a way to explore the relationship between humans and urban environments, and all the possible facets of that very broad definition. Other times i tend to think of it as the documentation of life in dense, artificial environments.

The street photos i enjoy the most show something interesting or poignant everyone else would miss, related to the themes above.
>>
>>1908925
>>1908922
Surprised by all this arguing over my photo.
Personally I agree that the composition is not that strong. I waited for the woman to be in line with the cherubs, but looking back I should have taken the photograph standing further to the left side of the image.
>>
>>1909076

Way too much noise reduction make it mushy.
>>
>>1909249

*making. How do I engrish.
>>
File: 1362599112815.jpg-(92 KB, 506x768, WTF.jpg)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>1909076
dude i had a look at your fb page, wtf is this shit man? (see pic).

You need some hard /p/ love to snap you out of your shitty post processing habits. Also, please watch the BH video on photography / compositional theory in linked thread.

Thank me in 2 years.

>>1906581 →
>>
>>1908907
composite
>>1908908
woah so fat
>>1908901
she is asking for directions why did you take a picture of her?
>>1908778
le flower buying face
>>1908664
emotional and touching
>le waiting dog face
>>1908528
woman on the right is good looking.
good photo
>>
>everybody ITT
>>
>>1909302
>composite
Explain. That image is not a composite.
>>
>>1909287
wow
>>
>>1909414
he just doesn't know what DoF is
>>
>>1908864
Is that Liverpool?
>>
>>1908423
Nice.
>>1908528
I would say that is definitely "street photography" as popular usage. Really nice, however I wish the lady on the rights legs were fully in the shot too, completely matching the lady on the left.
>>1908717
I like, interesting scene.
>>1908719
Amazing, very impr
essive. Portfolio?
>>1908742
Because a lot of people don't know what a dialogue is.
>>1908836
shut up
>>1908864
I like, interesting figure.
>>1908901
Good interest, not so much street as social documentary in terms of aesthetic though.
>Ancientpanda
You're too far away, imo. Not interesting enough compositions.

Anything I didn't comment on, sorry - I found them boring. Just my op though. I feel that street photos need people, or need evidence of human action (e.g. urban spaces) and ideally should have some kind of story/connection between the elements within them. Whether that story is made by the humour of the photographer, or was true to life doesn't matter.
>>
File: 1362608901028.jpg-(883 KB, 1000x1000, _MG_4330new.jpg)
883 KB
883 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362612540666.jpg-(602 KB, 1200x801, sweaty ass dude.jpg)
602 KB
602 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1909545
>title.jpg
>nigger
you're disgusting, leave forever
>>
File: 1362613462556.jpg-(588 KB, 1200x801, ass sweating dancer.jpg)
588 KB
588 KB JPG
>>1909552
Yeah I know, I messed that one up. Here's the fixed version.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362614537752.jpg-(313 KB, 800x600, S0544106.jpg)
313 KB
313 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362615713895.jpg-(222 KB, 1280x960, 1361281522644.jpg)
222 KB
222 KB JPG
>>1909588
This one, I hate. You see how the vertical lines are almost aligned? Yet, the horizontal ones are way off. So either crop the door off so you get rid of any strong vertical lines and fix the horizontal ones, or keep the door and fix the lens distortion so both horizontal and vertical are perfect. I would go with the latter.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362616349930.jpg-(1.96 MB, 1600x1200, Foto0200.jpg)
1.96 MB
1.96 MB JPG
my shitty c3 and i

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1909624
>>1909626
these are not street
>>
File: 1362616670960.jpg-(889 KB, 1191x1200, robertdoisneau_cabaretlenfer.jpg)
889 KB
889 KB JPG
>>1909614

umad?

Distortion correction is a cop-out for not being in the absolutely perfect spot at the right time, so I'll never use it because I'm almost never in the perfect spot at the perfect time. Few ever were, and I'm 22 so I have my whole life ahead of me to try.

The vertical lines are more important because they're the lines that my subjects run along, if I balance the horizontals, my subjects will be awkwardly tilted.

But, there are more important things in photos than perfect horizontal and vertical lines, like what's going on in the shot. Citing a Dosineau photo for reference, albeit for my shot it's a little mundane, but it's probably one of the stronger moments so far in this thread.

tl;dr Street photography's not for autists or people with OCD.
>>
File: 1362616963114.jpg-(264 KB, 1000x705, Y.jpg)
264 KB
264 KB JPG
She never did turn around :*(
>>
File: 1362617119696.jpg-(188 KB, 795x590, near perfect.jpg)
188 KB
188 KB JPG
>>1909633
Wow, take it easy there little artist.
Symmetry goes a long way.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362617349456.jpg-(201 KB, 800x533, IMG_4547.jpg)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
The best part of street photography is the argument over what street photography is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1909633
>But, there are more important things in photos than perfect horizontal and vertical lines
lel
>>
File: 1362617684878.jpg-(304 KB, 1000x636, Right.jpg)
304 KB
304 KB JPG
>>
File: 1362617876847.jpg-(190 KB, 795x590, 1362617119696.jpg)
190 KB
190 KB JPG
>>1909643

Do you honestly think that makes it look any better? It looks completely fake, like it is.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1908463
you dont have to name your photos "street", thats kind of arrogant.

Why dont post them in the recent shit thread anyway?
>>
File: 1362618164887.jpg-(66 KB, 500x618, so_very_street.jpg)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>1909659
Nigga all it needs is a few tweaks, I'm not going to spend 40min on photoshop for you. This was an example, I'm sure you get the idea.

But why would you care... You're documenting the human condition, right?
>>
File: 1362618344602.jpg-(585 KB, 1000x684, Swirl.jpg)
585 KB
585 KB JPG
>>
>>1909666

People just interest me and doing street helps keep my mind active. I'm honestly over trying to justify taking pictures of people, I just like it.

My approach is clearly a little more raw than yours (I like as little content manipulation as possible), which is fine because everyone considers the world differently.

This is just one shot over the weekend, my ego's not really invested in it or any of my photos, for that matter.
>>
File: 1362618593721.jpg-(472 KB, 701x1000, Bollards.jpg)
472 KB
472 KB JPG
>>
File: 1362620008992.jpg-(327 KB, 800x533, IMG_4267.jpg)
327 KB
327 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
Did anybody ever react to you shooting random people? I am too afraid to shoot street here in yurop because everyone is like "MUH PRIVACY" and thinks I am going to use their photographs to jerk off or to steal their identity or something.
>>
File: 1362626266434.jpg-(584 KB, 665x1000, L1000590.jpg)
584 KB
584 KB JPG
Went to the beach a few days ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362626336853.jpg-(841 KB, 798x1200, L1000584.jpg)
841 KB
841 KB JPG
It's kinda tricky taking action shots with a rangefinder.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362626400394.jpg-(800 KB, 1200x798, L1000596.jpg)
800 KB
800 KB JPG
Wish I would've timed this so the ball was in frame, I still like it though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362626481545.jpg-(1.02 MB, 1200x798, L1000601.jpg)
1.02 MB
1.02 MB JPG
The dog was a celebrity.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
and this is why we laugh at leica owners
>>
>>1909826

I really don't give a shit.
>>
>>1909828
u mad?
>>
>>1909830

u jelly.
>>
>>1909835
>shitty outdated camera with an outdated sensor
>jelly

No I am not. My D800E smokes your baby toy.
>>
>>1909868
Prove it.
>>
>>1909870
There is not much to prove.

"The Nikon D800 has these advantages over the Leica M9…

Larger screen
Twice the resolution
Weather sealed
Higher resolution screen
Lower noise at high ISO
Auto focus
Live view
More dynamic range
Longer battery life
Great for sports and other types of photography the Leica is not good with
More storage slots
Built-in flash
Self-cleaning sensor
Shoots twice as fast
Significantly longer exposures
Faster max shutter speed
Much faster write times to memory card
Does video
Way, way, way more cheaper

The Leica M9 has these advantages over the Nikon D800

Easy to carry (a GREAT travel camera)
Small, fast lenses
Leica glass (the finest optics in the world)
The “Leica Look”
Simple menus
Simple design
The “FUN” factor
Low profile (great for street shooting)
Requires a much smaller tripod (if you use a tripod)"

Notice how pathetic the advantages of the M9 are?
>>
>>1909822
Buy me an m9. Contribute to the arts.
>>
>>1909884
>pathetic
>Leica glass
>small size
>low profile

depends what you're shooting bro
but do you really think leica glass is pathetic?
>>
>>1909884
>Any year ever
>Comparing any range finder against any (D)SLR ever

Different tools for different jobs
>>
>>1909884
I don't know why it matters to you. I wish I had an m9 because it's just a simple but refined piece of equipment. I don't think it's worth the 9k or whatever they charge, but it looks like such fun.

It's not supposed to be a DSLR in a point-n-shoot body or something. I don't know why you'd even bother comparing the two. Many people who own M9s own DSLRs too - they're not mutually exclusive.

It's like comparing an old Zeiss 35mm with a Canon 400L or something. I don't know why you'd bother.
>>
>>1909884
No, fag. Prove that you have the D800, and post a great photo that you have taken with it. Geez, you're dumb as fuck, fucking home schooled faggot.
>>
File: 1362634276400.jpg-(1.01 MB, 2048x1280, 8514409163_3187aead43_k.jpg)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB JPG
Austin Tx
>>
>>1909900
>post a great photo

u first
>>
>>1909957
god digital bw looks so disgusting
>>
>>1909898
>>1909964

You're both fags who haven't shot anything worst posting.
>>
File: 1362634963514.jpg-(192 KB, 1000x665, P9020538.jpg)
192 KB
192 KB JPG
>>1909968
It's not because it's digital, it's because making b&w conversions is hard.

I got nothing new.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635251530.jpg-(1.87 MB, 2048x1280, 1362634276400.jpg)
1.87 MB
1.87 MB JPG
>>1909973
here I just improved it. Wasn't hard.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635263432.jpg-(212 KB, 1000x667, P9020512.jpg)
212 KB
212 KB JPG
>>1909973

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635370626.jpg-(207 KB, 667x1000, P9020521.jpg)
207 KB
207 KB JPG
>>1909982

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635417892.jpg-(160 KB, 1000x667, PB030132.jpg)
160 KB
160 KB JPG
>>1909984

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635629363.jpg-(242 KB, 1000x750, PB030107.jpg)
242 KB
242 KB JPG
>>1909986

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635661269.jpg-(204 KB, 1000x665, DSC_0674.jpg)
204 KB
204 KB JPG
>>1909991

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635744931.jpg-(165 KB, 1000x667, PB030158.jpg)
165 KB
165 KB JPG
>>1909992

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1362635783868.jpg-(82 KB, 800x800, R2-04750-0002.jpg)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>1909994
>>
File: 1362635875857.jpg-(375 KB, 800x533, kino-13.jpg)
375 KB
375 KB JPG
>>1909995

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1909287
lol wow forgot about that picture. lighthouse beach in new haven. back when I was obsessed with hdr and only had an olympus point and shoot. its gotten better since then. i agree my post isnt the best but im learning. I will totally check out your link though.
thanks for checkng the face book though man. and for the critiques.
>>
File: 1362635964184.jpg-(399 KB, 900x600, 16.jpg)
399 KB
399 KB JPG
>>1909997

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>street photo thread
>people post digital pictures
>>
File: 1362636043199.jpg-(274 KB, 900x600, 10 elotes.jpg)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
>>1910000

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1909287
and thanks for the heads up on that shot I had no Idea it was on the facebook. that's gotta go
>>
File: 1362636214334.jpg-(179 KB, 1000x667, R2-04750-0000.jpg)
179 KB
179 KB JPG
>>1910001
>street thread
>people posting color pictures

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1909485
here here Ham! well put and fine critiques. got anything to post?
>>
>>1910000
This reminds me of the time I went to Uruapan Michoacan.
>>
>>1909970
Alphon pls leave
>>
>>1909884

I have owned and still own several DSLRs. The D800 is a fantastic camera, with great modern features and a great sensor that I admit is better than my M9's.

Luckily though, I still don't give a shit what some smug, gear obsessed pixel peeper on the internet thinks of my photos or my camera. I have used and still use DSLRs for personal and professional use, but I still prefer Leica rangefinders and lenses in general. I know many other professionals who prefer Leica as well.

Most, though, just use the tools they personally prefer and don't waste time having e-peen wars with anonymous idiots on the internet.
>>
File: 1362642026250.jpg-(193 KB, 1000x667, a_reflective_fraction_of_(...).jpg)
193 KB
193 KB JPG
>>1909485
>>1908719
>>1909076

Thanks, I haven't got a portfolio. Though I have my deviantART site full of random pictures. You could check those if you want.

http://philippaopao.deviantart.com

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
pumping for street
>>
>>1910071
overexposed shallow and pedantic pretentious hipster bullshit
>>
File: 1362665354096.jpg-(620 KB, 3211x2141, IMG_4330-2.jpg)
620 KB
620 KB JPG
Couple of Grunge Chicks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1910335
but ham likes it and thinks it's good. why u so mean.
>>
File: 1362668293719.jpg-(514 KB, 1000x667, untitled-9827.jpg)
514 KB
514 KB JPG
O-okay

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1910374

Oh shit! Is she DISABLED?
>>
>>1910375
I think she just has trouble walking
>>
>>1910385

Meh, unexciting.
>>
>>1910394
excitement is in the eye of the beholder
>>
File: 1362671950482.jpg-(893 KB, 1600x1076, dsgfasdgaaga.jpg)
893 KB
893 KB JPG
there are people

does this count as street?
>>
>>1910414
I've fallen in love this photo. Do you have a flickr/500px/tumblr I can connect to and how much would you charge for an a4 print or would you be willing to do a print swap?
>>
>>1910416
u wot m8
>>
>>1910417
I like the photo. I am interested in seeing more of his/her work. I am interested in a possible purchase of photo or print swap.

Get it?

People need to learn when and when not to implement the " u wot m8" otherwise retards we ruin it's effectiveness.
>>
File: 1362673496000.jpg-(1.03 MB, 1600x1070, peoples backs.jpg)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
I wish that dude wouldn't have walked though my frame.
>>
>>1910416
i would also like to see more of his/her work!
>>
>>1910049
Not today, unfortunately.
>>1910414
Very well executed. I feel a separate shot could have also been made out of the three emergency exit signs alone (composed correctly). Right now they slightly detract from the people in the spot-gap - I wouldn't normally advocate heavy editing, but I think this shot would look much better if the far left hand sign were cloned out. What do you think?
>>
>>1910569
Ham you're shit
>>
bump for more street
>>
>>1909482
Yes it is :) I was visiting passport place for a day.


J-List

Delete Post [File Only] Password
Style
[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

- futaba + yotsuba -
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.