[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
Board
SettingsHome
4chan
/p/ - Photography


Posting mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
reCAPTCHA challenge image
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
4chan Pass users can bypass this CAPTCHA. [Learn More]
File
Password (Password used for deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Japanese このサイトについて - 翻訳


Toggle
I spent the day sorting through and re-reading a few thousand e-mails from 2010, and it was really a blast from the past. What a year it was.
Thanks for an awesome 9 years, and for some great e-mails along the way.

As always, I read all of my e-mail and can be reached with questions/comments/concerns/hate mail/and plain ol' hellos at moot@4chan.org (or on AIM at MOOTCHAT).
tl;dr version of 2010: "SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, and VIRUSES: The Movie"

File: 1361024613258.jpg-(423 KB, 1000x439, 0004.jpg)
423 KB
423 KB JPG
Long exposure thread?

Long exposure thread

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
what lens are you using? nice photo OP
>>
>>1885930
Cheers. Canon FD 24mm f/2.8 SSC
>>
File: 1361026406742.jpg-(388 KB, 1000x589, 1213131.jpg)
388 KB
388 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361026673913.jpg-(452 KB, 1000x662, DSC_0212-2.jpg)
452 KB
452 KB JPG
Could only do 3 seconds because I didn't have an ND filter and there was still too much light.

Is there a way to get around that without using an ND filter? Exposure comp?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1885950
Nope, pretty much. Exposure comp only tells the meter where you want it to go; if you were at f/22 and lowest ISO you didn't have much else up your sleeve without an ND
>>
>>1885950
No.
>>
File: 1361027871725.jpg-(464 KB, 1000x563, Naval V2 Cropped.jpg)
464 KB
464 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361028529681.jpg-(400 KB, 1000x750, R0011609blue_resiz.jpg)
400 KB
400 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361030229120.jpg-(692 KB, 1000x657, TB NEWest.jpg)
692 KB
692 KB JPG
>>1885967
Taken at f22 like a pleb, twas about a year ago.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361031457813.jpg-(102 KB, 1080x718, DSC_0348.jpg)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
>>1885998
I can one up you. my first ever long exposure, shot in 2008 I think
>>
>>1886017
That looks like itd from one of the GTA games, which one exactly I can't remember. Where is it?
>>
>>1886018
Vice City perhaps? this was shot in Miami.
>>
>>1886018
>>1886020
Vice City was based on Miami.
I fucking love R*.
>>
>>1886023
Thank you for adding nothing.
>>
>>1886020
>>1886023
That's the one, great game. Miami looks like a cool place.
>>
>>1886024
That's cool man. Because your comment obviously added so much more ;) <3 xxx
>>
>>1886033
lol@u gtfo lame loser
>>
>>1886024
This is a photography board yes but that doesn't mean we shouldn't ever talk about anything ever.

And while I agree that gaming producers/publishers like R* and Valve are massively overrated and that a life of "gaming" is a waste of time I acknowledge that the same can be said about things I do, so I just let people do what they want and don't really care.
>>
>>1886045
and I meant to say

>that doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about anything *else* ever
>>
File: 1361035694923.jpg-(423 KB, 1000x607, 0002.jpg)
423 KB
423 KB JPG
No movement, so I guess it's a rather dull shot.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361043941010.jpg-(1.85 MB, 2234x1716, 13.jpg)
1.85 MB
1.85 MB JPG
Mamiya, not sure which model. My friend was letting play with hers a while back.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361052011133.jpg-(22 KB, 640x436, Long.jpg)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
star trails, exposed a couple of hours on film

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361052926252.jpg-(795 KB, 886x1325, DSC_0877_8_9_tonemapped.jpg)
795 KB
795 KB JPG
30 seconds plus/minus two stop fused.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361053608329.jpg-(107 KB, 1024x768, image.jpg)
107 KB
107 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1886382
careful m8 u cud overeat ur sensor
>>
File: 1361054099020.jpg-(570 KB, 1000x662, IMGP0719.jpg)
570 KB
570 KB JPG
I don't fully understand why it makes such colorful streaks.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361054181663.jpg-(533 KB, 1000x662, IMGP0869.jpg)
533 KB
533 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361054438604.jpg-(2.03 MB, 3865x851, finalmaybe_2.jpg)
2.03 MB
2.03 MB JPG
Long Exposure + Pano

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361054814436.jpg-(249 KB, 1000x438, IMG_3321.jpg)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
Some buildings on London, not sure which ones.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361054869980.jpg-(482 KB, 533x800, 20120324_Web-_DSC1956 - Copy.jpg)
482 KB
482 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361056761770.jpg-(628 KB, 878x664, DSC_0665.jpg)
628 KB
628 KB JPG
>>1886417
I'm pretty sure I got the same buildings but from farther back

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361057853101.jpg-(203 KB, 1000x438, IMG_3334.jpg)
203 KB
203 KB JPG
Another shot of London, It's beginning to get a nice skyline.

>>1886439
Yup, looks like you did.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
protobump
>>
File: 1361074728771.jpg-(394 KB, 1068x712, IMG_0898.jpg)
394 KB
394 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361074887742.jpg-(1.55 MB, 1067x1600, Power Plant11.jpg)
1.55 MB
1.55 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1885998
how'd you get this? stand in the middle of the street?
>>
>>1886687
Why did you have a song exposure on this? lol.


Anyways, is the only way to obtain good long exposure photos is through an ND filter?
>>
File: 1361076427402.jpg-(1.03 MB, 2144x1424, IMGP7287.jpg)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
How'd I do?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1886699
ND filter is only good for long exposure if there is abundant light, meaning there's still a fair amount of light.

ND filters, depending on strength, will allow you to expose x amount of stops longer without overexposing.

So if you wanted to expose a seaside landscape where the sun has just set or is about to rise you'd use an ND filter to get that nice, soft, 'ghost' look from the water without blowing out everything.
>>
File: 1361079073361.jpg-(310 KB, 1000x662, Drive v2.jpg)
310 KB
310 KB JPG
>>1886696
Traffic islands and a low angle.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
...and a lot of photoshop
>>
>>1886741
wut?
>>
>>1886452
>6-bladed aperture

laughinggirls.gif.jpg.m4a.tiff.doc.pdf
>>
>>1886835
This is the most retarded gearfag post I have read all day. It's like laughing at OP's pic because it was probably a $60 lens. Get out and take some pics, or get a life.nef
>>
>>1886719
Im diggin this that fellas face looks worried. not staged photo I take it...
>>
File: 1361102392258.jpg-(314 KB, 671x1000, IMG_3349.jpg)
314 KB
314 KB JPG
This lens has 9 aperture blades I hope that is enough for you fags.

>>1886835
The lens cost me $10 so idgaf

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1886741
If you are suggesting the photos are shopped to make it it look like they are shot in the middle of the road, then you are mistaken.

>>1886854
Yep un-staged, I was getting quite a few weird looks..
>>
>>1886078
>brew
>mobil
sneaky

>>1886237
I like the boobs

>>1886382
this>>1886398

>>1886402
>>1886405
that's some bretty good cool stuff.

>>1886719
love this.
>>
>>1886699
>Why did you have a song exposure on this? lol.
Nearly pitch black abandoned power plant.
>>
File: 1361147570716.jpg-(658 KB, 1000x1115, DSC_0007.jpg)
658 KB
658 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1887793
One of the best star photographs I've ever seen in my live. Holy shit.

Share your portfolio pls
>>
File: 1361149485464.jpg-(285 KB, 530x800, CatenayCity.jpg)
285 KB
285 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361149875044.jpg-(563 KB, 1000x1115, DSC_0007(2).jpg)
563 KB
563 KB JPG
>>1887817
It's faked, like most other star shots. Here's the original. Sorry I had to disappoing you.

Oh, and if you look closely, you see "my" stars a tiny bit trailed behind the big ones. A little mistake I noticed right after I saved, but I was too lazy to fix it...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1887840
>like most other star shots
babby, please.
>>
File: 1361151396293.jpg-(248 KB, 667x1001, 4455.jpg)
248 KB
248 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1887840
>f/4
>ISO 100
>30 sec

I'm going to take a wild guess and say you didn't turn on mirror lockup either and that's probably where your star trails are coming from.
>>
>>1887885
Also explains why the lights in the foreground have trails
Oh wait
>>
>>1887886
According to the rule of 600, you should have been able to take a longer exposure than 30 seconds @ 18mm no problem.
>>
>>1887889

Rule of 600 relies on 35mm equiv focal length
600/27 = 22
which is there's trails
>>
>>1887889
>>1887912
To be exact:

There are other factors that are associated with the trail length.

L(star trail length) = [F(focal length of lens scope [trail length in same units as focal length]) x E(exposure length) x (2π/T(length of sidereal day in same units as exposure) x cosD(declination of the star)]/pixel size

Just sayin
>>
>>1886719
I see.

Keep doing what you're doing....great stuff
>>
File: 1361170205961.jpg-(1.48 MB, 1000x1000, 6746-Edit.jpg)
1.48 MB
1.48 MB JPG
>>1888050
Sorry /P/hag, here you go. I was just going over the basics of working out an exposure for it but whatevs.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1888200
oh god my sides.. its murred
>>
>>1888212
no it's not you idiot.
>>
>>1888213
0/10
>>
will post astro later
>>
>>1888212
'Murred'?
>>
>>1888613
mirrored
>>
File: 1361195864845.jpg-(331 KB, 1000x586, Lake.jpg)
331 KB
331 KB JPG
Did I dun good?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1888629

delicious
>>
>>1888629

>Dat water
>Dem clouds

Makes me hungry.
>>
>>1888629

Less water, more sky.
>>
>>1888629
I think at this point it's a little ridiculous and actually detracts from the photo.

Clouds are fine but you've given a lot of space to the water and right now it's just a gray mush. Waves would at least provide texture.
>>
>>1888639
this. i got an urge to eat cotton candy
>>
File: 1361220641024.jpg-(338 KB, 1000x666, pIMG_6175-5.jpg)
338 KB
338 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361222844038.jpg-(409 KB, 1200x709, DSC_0195.jpg)
409 KB
409 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361223820360.jpg-(230 KB, 1000x663, pier.jpg)
230 KB
230 KB JPG
If only 2 seconds count.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361223957483.jpg-(346 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1651.jpg)
346 KB
346 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1889171
Nice, what a coincidence I've got the same camera and tuner.
>>
>>1889198
dat unfortunate flare...
>>
>>1888649
>>1888650

Thanks for the input. I'll have to keep this in mind next time I'm giving it a go.

The water came out quite nice compared to the horrible poo brown it really was.
>>
File: 1361227166615.jpg-(323 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1650.jpg)
323 KB
323 KB JPG
>>1889241
better?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361227241435.jpg-(342 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1652.jpg)
342 KB
342 KB JPG
>>1889241
how about full flare

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361240474044.jpg-(274 KB, 1000x667, resize.jpg)
274 KB
274 KB JPG
here's my two cents

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1885925 (OP)
you a vancourite bro? looks like the seawall/coal harbor.
>>1885971
looks like a gothic video game
>>1888200
reminds me of a moth for some reason. SPACE MOTH. Ciould be a cool metal band name.
>>1888629
looks like a painting, well done.
>>
File: 1361241940504.jpg-(483 KB, 1000x662, IMGP5120.jpg)
483 KB
483 KB JPG
I took this shot when wandering around Hollywood one night a while back. 's ok. I like the cop in the middle.

I need to go back and re-edit this set, because I ddin't bother to white balance 'em. I had liked the orange glow but now I'm less fond of it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361242876535.jpg-(378 KB, 1000x662, IMGP3639.jpg)
378 KB
378 KB JPG
>>1889486
Two more; this was taken on the 405 overpass that they were fixing. It's part of the reason LA had a "Carmageddon" and shut down the 405.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361243096398.jpg-(501 KB, 1000x662, IMGP5098.jpg)
501 KB
501 KB JPG
>>1889496
Last one. This is the image I'm having put on my replacement credit card. I got kicked off the parking structure I was taking these on just before I started playing with my Jupiter lens. Those fuckers.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361243289515.jpg-(51 KB, 960x502, Seaside jetty.jpg)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>
File: 1361243341661.jpg-(198 KB, 960x720, Chapman falls.jpg)
198 KB
198 KB JPG
>>
File: 1361243514713.jpg-(53 KB, 2048x563, seaside jetty 2.jpg)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>
>>1889483
>you a vancourite bro? looks like the seawall/coal harbor.
Nope - Australia. Rather warmer weather here than there!
>>
>>1889514
Go for longer, shoot from higher up at a further downward angle, boost vibrancy in post a tiiiiny bit
>>
File: 1361274923037.png-(3.43 MB, 1920x1080, Trails Of Speed-8b.png)
3.43 MB
3.43 MB PNG
>>
File: 1361275625905.jpg-(647 KB, 1500x487, _MG_3477.jpg)
647 KB
647 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1889905
Lain, some of your post processing is really hit and miss, especially your night stuff. This shot has had too much sharpening/highpass in conjunction with noise removal, the results are not pretty.
>>
>>1889932
yeah you are right, also the yellow looks way to green and for some reason it's soft as fuck on the edges. Long story shot, I know what should be better but I don't like the shot enough to open it up again.

Just my most recent long exposer.
>>
File: 1361284751658.jpg-(626 KB, 1500x487, 1361275625905.jpg)
626 KB
626 KB JPG
>>1889905
I mean, it's just a snapshit of some fireworks. but you could at least not have shit white balance. the nuclear stuff needs to go, everytime. don't post any more pictures with vomitous shit colors

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361286361444.jpg-(101 KB, 1000x438, 16 (Copy).jpg)
101 KB
101 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1890064
oh god see this >>1889932
>>
File: 1361292072184.jpg-(264 KB, 1357x720, lentos.jpg)
264 KB
264 KB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1887793
what do you do to fake it? Just clone random stars, increase/decrease size???

I mean the faked version is nice but it's kinda obnoxious to act like you actually took *that* photo
>>
>>1890064
Not sharp enough
>>
>>1885925 (OP)
F1.0?
>>
>>1891181
Hurrrr
>>
>>1891181
OP here - it's a "dumb" XF-FD adaptor with a manual focus Canon FD lens attached, so no information is sent to the camera regarding f/stop. It was either f/8 or f/11
>>
bump
>>
File: 1361367811310.jpg-(1.03 MB, 1600x855, DSC_7614-4.jpg)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB JPG
quadcopta

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
File: 1361367882657.jpg-(508 KB, 1024x678, 6544099843_11f98229bf_b.jpg)
508 KB
508 KB JPG
>>
>>1891616
Fuck me, how many times are you going to post this photo.
>>
File: 1361367974440.jpg-(1.1 MB, 1200x680, sparks.jpg)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB JPG


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1891618
This is the best photo I have seen on /p/ in ages. How do you get such wonderful colour?
>>
>>1891619

I don't think I've posted this on this board before?

Maybe once when I first took it months ago...
>>
>>1891624
I don't think I've posted this on this board before?

GTFO
>>
>>1891622

Thanks!

It was just as the sun was coming up, this was shot towards the south when the sky was sort of glowing purple.
>>
>>1891616
Babby's first light painting.
>>
>>1891621
I think this could have been a great shot if you had captured all of it, and not make it pink.
>>
File: 1361392328799.jpg-(1.19 MB, 1200x724, DSC_6633.jpg)
1.19 MB
1.19 MB JPG
>>1891697

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
>>
>>1887830
This is damn good and deserves recognition
>>
>>1887830
This is fucking epic. Do you have it somewhere uploaded where I can buy a print?
>>
>>1892041
>>1892036

It's a nice shot, I'd be pretty chuffed with it, but is this 8-minute samefaggotry?
>>
>>1887830
Why isn't there any color though? Is your camera broken?
>>
File: 1361415629076.jpg-(236 KB, 1000x428, AnzacRefections.jpg)
236 KB
236 KB JPG
>>1892036
>>1892041
>>1892239
Thanks. It's one of my favourite spots in the city, going to miss living in there.
>>1892041
I get prints done locally and ship them out. What size would you be after?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]



Delete Post [File Only] Password
Style
[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

- futaba + yotsuba -
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.