/p/ - Sup /p/ since everyone complains about the lack of

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:00
No.1775825

File: 1352757631434.jpg-(1.06 MB, 667x1000, _MG_1934.jpg)

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:00 No.1775825

Replies: >>1775826 >>1775846 >>1775867 >>1775868 >>1777634 >>1778376

Sup /p/ since everyone complains about the lack of photo threads. I'm gonna post some shots from my last 3 rolls.

They are all shot on cheap drugstore 1 euro film.
(200 or 400 iso). They are all edited and don't match the real colors of the film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:05

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:01
No.1775826

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:01 No.1775826

Replies: >>1777634

File: 1352757691859.jpg-(799 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1983.jpg)

>>1775825 (OP)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:43

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:03
No.1775829

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:03 No.1775829

Replies: >>1775918 >>1775960 >>1777634

File: 1352757788399.jpg-(1 MB, 667x1000, _MG_1932.jpg)

I fucking hate that pic it was a bitch to edit and I still don't think it looks right

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:00

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:04
No.1775831

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:04 No.1775831

Replies: >>1775849 >>1777634

File: 1352757881223.jpg-(1.19 MB, 667x1000, _MG_1987.jpg)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:48

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:05
No.1775832

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:05 No.1775832

Replies: >>1775846 >>1780183

File: 1352757933002.jpg-(533 KB, 667x1000, _MG_1958.jpg)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:14

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:07
No.1775833

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:07 No.1775833

Replies: >>1775836 >>1777634 >>1780183

File: 1352758029342.jpg-(395 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1970.jpg)

finally it gets dark

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:19

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:07
No.1775836

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:07 No.1775836

Replies: >>1775837 >>1780183

File: 1352758069113.jpg-(371 KB, 667x1000, _MG_1972.jpg)

>>1775833

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:23

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:08
No.1775837

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:08 No.1775837

Replies: >>1779195 >>1780183

File: 1352758116881.jpg-(376 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1975.jpg)

>>1775836

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:31

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:11
No.1775839

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:11 No.1775839

Replies: >>1775841 >>1780183

File: 1352758269107.jpg-(355 KB, 667x1000, _MG_1974.jpg)

I think this looks a bit like poster from ''the Thing''

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:27

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:11
No.1775841

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:11 No.1775841

Replies: >>1779931

File: 1352758310518.jpg-(377 KB, 667x1000, _MG_2008.jpg)

>>1775839

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:52

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:13
No.1775845

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:13 No.1775845

Replies: >>1775848 >>1775849

File: 1352758380718.jpg-(527 KB, 1000x667, _MG_1979.jpg)

party hard

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 22:59:39

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:13
No.1775846

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:13 No.1775846

Replies: >>1775858

>>1775832
good scene, absolutely shit crop

>>1775825 (OP)
missed focus on background. stop down. If intentional, you're a twat

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:15
No.1775848

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:15 No.1775848

Replies: >>1775858

>>1775845
having a face clearly distinguishable in the crowd to anchor your eyes would make this really good. As it is, it's shit. Boring mess of shapes in bottom half with no clear subject or structure. too much pink

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:15
No.1775849

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:15 No.1775849

Replies: >>1775851

File: 1352758541417.jpg-(370 KB, 667x1000, _MG_2032.jpg)

>>1775845
okay thats it

>>1775831
looks pretty awful

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 23:00:02

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:16
No.1775851

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:16 No.1775851

Replies: >>1775853

>>1775849
few details makes this geometric. but the ground is too heavy. shit.

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:17
No.1775853

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:17 No.1775853

>>1775851
I think I missed focus as well

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:20
No.1775856

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:20 No.1775856

Replies: >>1775859

File: 1352758841897.jpg-(890 KB, 1642x1094, 00700020.jpg)

I'll play this game. Photos from my recent roll of Portra 400. Some shit, some, even more shit.

1/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software QuickTime 7.6.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi
Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:11 00:34:15

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:21
No.1775857

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:21 No.1775857

Replies: >>1775859 >>1775861 >>1776564

File: 1352758882309.jpg-(890 KB, 1940x1287, 00700019.jpg)

2/4

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:22
No.1775858

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:22 No.1775858

Replies: >>1775862 >>1775871

>>1775846
you want a closer crop?
>>1775848
its a party snapshot and manual focusing under flashing lights with fast moving people is kind of hard.

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:22
No.1775859

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:22 No.1775859

Replies: >>1775861

File: 1352758970139.jpg-(167 KB, 1000x694, 00700015_1.jpg)

>>1775856
>>1775857
Gah, forgot to resize.

3/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi
Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Image Width 1000
Image Height 694

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:24
No.1775860

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:24 No.1775860

Replies: >>1780137

File: 1352759089746.jpg-(921 KB, 1198x1798, 00700009.jpg)

Had to shoot wide open 1.4 and 1/15 sec... kinda like the softness though.

4/4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software QuickTime 7.6.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi
Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 14:16:42

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:24
No.1775861

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:24 No.1775861

>>1775859
small enough bro.

>>1775857
>>1775859
I like them

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:25
No.1775862

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:25 No.1775862

Replies: >>1775877

>>1775858
I don't give a fuck how hard it is to take the photo. No one cares how easy or hard you worked when they look at the finished product. If it's really that much of a challenge practice your shooting technique.

Anonymous !!uPiHYFPeJke
11/12/12(Mon)17:25
No.1775867

Anonymous !!uPiHYFPeJke 11/12/12(Mon)17:25 No.1775867

Replies: >>1775877

>>1775825 (OP)
lass mich raten- paradies von DM?
i still got some rolls here.. need to find some time to get them developed :l

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:26
No.1775868

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:26 No.1775868

>>1775825 (OP)
Sorry OP, hijacked your thread.

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:26
No.1775871

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:26 No.1775871

>>1775858
The scene is good, the aesthetics of the film is good, the composition is shit awful. Go wider and shorter. Think about density of visual information.

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:29
No.1775877

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:29 No.1775877

Replies: >>1775882 >>1776347

>>1775862
dude they all just some party snapshots I don't give a fuck about my pics I took drunk. I'm not trying do make art or anything.

>>1775867
100 Punkte, ich glaub du oder Hafenmeister haben mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht.

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:32
No.1775882

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:32 No.1775882

Replies: >>1775886

>>1775877
You don't even know what art means.

Don't be mad about being shit at photography. Taking pretty party snapshots is easy, I don't know how you fucked it up so badly

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:37
No.1775886

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:37 No.1775886

Replies: >>1775893

>>1775882
I don't know man I think I just suck with the art of taking pretty party snapshots.

I'm not mad at all. I'm laughing my ass off because you take my pics so serious

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)17:40
No.1775893

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)17:40 No.1775893

Replies: >>1775918 >>1775954 >>1775960 >>1779931

>>1775886
not everyone reacts this badly to criticism. You shouldn't be so defensive.

Also it's not being serious to call shit, shit. It's like you know you suck so you're making as many excuses as you can to mitigate responsibility

"oh these were on cheap film"
"oh theses are just party shots"
"oh i dont even care anyways"

lol

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/12/12(Mon)17:55
No.1775918

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/12/12(Mon)17:55 No.1775918

Replies: >>1775960

>>1775893
I'm never blamed the film I just find it pretty cool that you can get decent film for 1 euro.

If I say I don't care about some party shots, I really don't care.

If you wanna be helpful tell me how I get the color right in >>1775829

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)18:27
No.1775954

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)18:27 No.1775954

>>1775893
You are clearly a dickhead. Why are you even in a photography board?
troll/10

Anonymous
11/12/12(Mon)18:34
No.1775960

Anonymous 11/12/12(Mon)18:34 No.1775960

File: 1352763269664.jpg-(560 KB, 667x1000, 1352757788399.jpg)

>>1775918

I'm not the same poster as >>1775893

But to point in a direction with regards to >>1775829 color. Did you have a warming filter on the lens? It looks slightly warm, but that may also be the light seeing the pinkish hue on the left side of the frame.

I think it's a fine example of deep sunrise/sunset on film if you shot this without filters.

Film reacts to filters massively. Having a warming filter in direct sun, especially during sunrise/sunset will make film images look extremely yellow.

I threw some blues and greens into the picture as an example to show you a different tone this image could take. It's not perfectly adjusted, but quickly bracketed for illustrative use.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software QuickTime 7.6.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi
Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:12 15:26:05

giannis
11/12/12(Mon)21:29
No.1776126

giannis 11/12/12(Mon)21:29 No.1776126

Replies: >>1776242

File: 1352773779924.jpg-(251 KB, 1000x663, 98200003.jpg)

Canz I hijack thread with too?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model QSS-32_33
Camera Software QSS-32_33 5.02S.003 2008.10.27
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi
Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Color Space Information sRGB
Image Width 1000
Image Height 663

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/13/12(Tue)01:20
No.1776242

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/13/12(Tue)01:20 No.1776242

>>1776126
Sure, I'm at work so no one can stop you

CreepyGerman
11/13/12(Tue)03:20
No.1776347

CreepyGerman 11/13/12(Tue)03:20 No.1776347

Replies: >>1776700

Sehr schöne Bilder

>>1775877
Bringt der DM film eigentlich irgendwas hatte noch nie die Mut mir den zu holen?

Anonymous
11/13/12(Tue)09:23
No.1776564

Anonymous 11/13/12(Tue)09:23 No.1776564

>>1775857
That's the building of a thousand arseholes. You must have got some serious neck ache doing that

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/13/12(Tue)12:51
No.1776700

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/13/12(Tue)12:51 No.1776700

Replies: >>1776740

>>1776347
Ich find ihn für den Preis nicht schlecht.

CreepyGerman
11/13/12(Tue)13:50
No.1776740

CreepyGerman 11/13/12(Tue)13:50 No.1776740

Replies: >>1777615

>>1776700
Dann probier ich am besten mal das nächste mal aus :)

Hafenmeister !l582Vln9EE
11/14/12(Wed)14:47
No.1777615

Hafenmeister !l582Vln9EE 11/14/12(Wed)14:47 No.1777615

Replies: >>1777666 >>1777835

>>1776740
Der Film ist einfach unschlagbar, wenn man neue Kameras testen möchte. Die Bildqualität ist für den Preis einfach klasse und er eignet sich auch aufgrund des niedrigen Preises sehr zum experimentieren. Einfach mal kaufen, einlegen und eine Rolle mit Bullshit vollknipsen.

Anonymous
11/14/12(Wed)15:02
No.1777634

Anonymous 11/14/12(Wed)15:02 No.1777634

>>1775825 (OP)
>>1775829
>>1775831
Love what you've done with the color.

>>1775826
>>1775833
These would be great if they were centered a bit more.

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/14/12(Wed)15:37
No.1777666

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/14/12(Wed)15:37 No.1777666

Replies: >>1777668 >>1777681

>>1777615
hast du schon den Rossmann Film ausprobiert?

Anonymous !!uPiHYFPeJke
11/14/12(Wed)15:43
No.1777668

Anonymous !!uPiHYFPeJke 11/14/12(Wed)15:43 No.1777668

>>1777666
Rossmann Film kommt von Fuji, sollte soweit ich weiß Superia sein.

Hafenmeister !l582Vln9EE
11/14/12(Wed)16:04
No.1777681

Hafenmeister !l582Vln9EE 11/14/12(Wed)16:04 No.1777681

Replies: >>1777694

>>1777666
Ich nicht, aber ein Freund von mir kauft sich den Film ständig. Liefert ganz ordentliche Ergebnisse. Von den Farben würde ich auch mal auf Superia tippen.

maoam
11/14/12(Wed)16:11
No.1777682

maoam 11/14/12(Wed)16:11 No.1777682

File: 1352927462879.jpg-(468 KB, 651x1000, rabenstein.jpg)

hmm, die Fotos erscheinen schärfer abhängig vom skalierungs Algorithmus 9000px->1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width 6345
Image Height 9751
Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition RGB
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:14 22:06:35
Color Space Information sRGB
Image Width 651
Image Height 1000

Anonymous
11/14/12(Wed)16:32
No.1777694

Anonymous 11/14/12(Wed)16:32 No.1777694

>>1777681
Wenn Rosmman, wie müller/Schlecker, den gleichen Film in der Dose hat, dann wird es
vermutlich Fuji C200 sein, vermutlich verwandt mit Nexia (Emulsion für APS). Dürfte auch das alte Superia 200 Material abgelöst haben, weil einfach besser.
Verstehe den "Hype" um das Paradies-Material eh nicht. Absolut durchschnittlicher Film mit nervig warmer Abstimmung (klar, kann man in der Vergrößerung/beim Scan neutralisieren).
Der Fuji C200 ist mMn um Längen besser (Schärfe, Auflösung) mit neutralerer Farbwiedergabe (allerdings mit Fuji-Grün).

http://aphog.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=9230

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/14/12(Wed)18:04
No.1777825

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/14/12(Wed)18:04 No.1777825

File: 1352934242809.jpg-(508 KB, 667x1000, _MG_1930-Wiederhergestellt.jpg)

convert into b&w

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make Canon
Camera Model Canon EOS 60D
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi
Vertical Resolution 240 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:15 00:02:24
Exposure Time 1/2 sec
F-Number f/5.6
Exposure Program Manual
ISO Speed Rating 100
Lens Aperture f/5.6
Exposure Bias 0 EV
Metering Mode Pattern
Flash No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length 90.00 mm
Color Space Information Uncalibrated
Image Width 667
Image Height 1000
Rendering Normal
Exposure Mode Manual
White Balance Auto
Scene Capture Type Standard

Anonymous
11/14/12(Wed)18:17
No.1777835

Anonymous 11/14/12(Wed)18:17 No.1777835

Replies: >>1777837 >>1777855

>>1777615
guys do you realize that DMs are present also outside germany? please don't be so national and rather be more social democratic and switch to english. i can understand a bit of what you are talking about but it would be much more pleasant and polite if you spoke the language that majority here understand.

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/14/12(Wed)18:20
No.1777837

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/14/12(Wed)18:20 No.1777837

>>1777835
no I did not know that.

Sorry for all that german it's just so much faster to write in your mother language

Anonymous
11/14/12(Wed)18:21
No.1777838

Anonymous 11/14/12(Wed)18:21 No.1777838

Replies: >>1777849

Pretty solid, OP. Nice colors on the tree's pictures. What is the cheap film and where is that place?

Portra guy did a good job too.

Anonymous
11/14/12(Wed)18:32
No.1777849

Anonymous 11/14/12(Wed)18:32 No.1777849

>>1777838
oh yeah and you missed the focus on the op

Anonymous !!uPiHYFPeJke
11/14/12(Wed)18:36
No.1777855

Anonymous !!uPiHYFPeJke 11/14/12(Wed)18:36 No.1777855

Replies: >>1777867

>>1777835
but.. the main question is- do they also sell the same film outside of germany?

Anonymous
11/14/12(Wed)18:46
No.1777867

Anonymous 11/14/12(Wed)18:46 No.1777867

>>1777855
interesting question. they actually can rebrand any cheap film available here (central europe). good news is i haven't heard of a single c41 film made here. (B&W is different story - hello czechfag neighbours)

Anonymous
11/15/12(Thu)09:57
No.1778376

Anonymous 11/15/12(Thu)09:57 No.1778376

Replies: >>1778749

>>1775825 (OP)
OP could you please post the original scans of some photos? i have never been brave enough to try this "paradies" film. just wondering how the colors look like. also if you posted screenshot from photoshop showing the curves it would be also great.

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/15/12(Thu)17:04
No.1778749

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/15/12(Thu)17:04 No.1778749

Replies: >>1778752 >>1779188

File: 1353017066561.jpg-(1.51 MB, 1920x1080, lightroomfilm.jpg)

>>1778376
I do my film stuff in lightroom.

I actually have no idea how to hit the real color. Just look at some pics on flickr.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi
Vertical Resolution 72 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:15 23:00:05
Color Space Information Uncalibrated
Image Width 1920
Image Height 1080

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/15/12(Thu)17:09
No.1778752

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/15/12(Thu)17:09 No.1778752

Replies: >>1779188 >>1779194

File: 1353017356272.jpg-(1.82 MB, 2000x1333, _MG_1936.jpg)

>>1778749
or try it out yourself

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution 100 dpi
Vertical Resolution 100 dpi
Image Created 2012:11:15 23:08:02

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)08:24
No.1779188

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)08:24 No.1779188

Replies: >>1780032

>>1778749
>>1778752
i actually meant something different. i thought you reversed the photo using scanner software. and you didn't like it. so you adjusted the photo to your liking.
that's why i asked for
1. default colors right after scan (already reverted, not negative)
2. curves that changes default colors to "ajdusted"

i didn't realize that you reverted it manually. thank you for delivery anyway. will lookup on flickr.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)08:54
No.1779194

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)08:54 No.1779194

File: 1353074064358.jpg-(1.07 MB, 1000x667, neg111612.jpg)

>>1778752
>or try it out yourself
Quick try in Gimp. That was fun.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)08:57
No.1779195

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)08:57 No.1779195

>>1775837
I like this. I'm not sure why, but it sparks my curiosity.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:12
No.1779228

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:12 No.1779228

Replies: >>1779229 >>1779230 >>1779231 >>1779233 >>1779237 >>1779238 >>1779240 >>1779273

Can I join in?

I'm a /p/ newfag and this is what I brought back from Prague this year.

Constructive criticism is hoped for.

1/?

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:12
No.1779229

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:12 No.1779229

Replies: >>1779232 >>1779239 >>1779273

File: 1353078767456.jpg-(180 KB, 648x960, Scan-121110-0054resized.jpg)

>>1779228
Aw, forgot pic.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:13
No.1779230

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:13 No.1779230

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353078824996.jpg-(636 KB, 2048x1371, Scan-121110-0063resized.jpg)

>>1779228
2/?

These are untouched with Photoshop, by the way. I don't even have PS.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:14
No.1779231

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:14 No.1779231

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353078873355.jpg-(601 KB, 2048x1397, Scan-121110-0066resized.jpg)

>>1779228
3/?

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:15
No.1779232

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:15 No.1779232

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353078959967.jpg-(153 KB, 653x960, Scan-121111-0034resized.jpg)

>>1779229
4/?

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:17
No.1779233

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:17 No.1779233

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353079039294.jpg-(634 KB, 2048x1385, Scan-121111-0030resized.jpg)

>>1779228
5/?

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:23
No.1779237

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:23 No.1779237

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353079385045.jpg-(1.66 MB, 2455x3633, Scan-121110-0031.jpg)

>>1779228
6/?
This one was horribly underexposed and beaten into the current shape with scanning software settings.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make Canon
Camera Model FS2700
Camera Software VueScan 9 x32 (9.1.17)
Image-Specific Properties:

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:24
No.1779238

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:24 No.1779238

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353079490723.jpg-(129 KB, 649x960, Scan-121114-0003arescaled.jpg)

>>1779228
7/?

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:25
No.1779239

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:25 No.1779239

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353079556781.jpg-(120 KB, 639x960, Scan-121115-0008arescaled.jpg)

>>1779229
8/?
This one was taken in a big hurry, as the streetlights there change very fast.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)10:28
No.1779240

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)10:28 No.1779240

Replies: >>1779273

File: 1353079683265.jpg-(593 KB, 2449x3615, Scan-121110-0008dobryskan.jpg)

>>1779228
9/9, and this will be it for now.

Any feedback is very welcome, I'm a total babby.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make Canon
Camera Model FS2700
Camera Software VueScan 9 x32 (9.1.17)
Image-Specific Properties:

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)11:47
No.1779273

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)11:47 No.1779273

Replies: >>1779279

>>1779228
With that many pictures, you probably should've started your own thread. Also, resize your photos to 1000 on the long side. Since you're claiming to be new, I'll give you a pass and actually comment.
>>1779229
The angle of the building and the fact that you cut off the bottom is distracting. Also, the color looks a bit oversaturated. Also, you need to use whatever dust removal your scanner has because these are a mess.
>>1779230
Could've been a decent shot had you not cut off the bottom of the building, again.
>>1779231
Again, step back a few feet. Give the building a little room to breath, and straight your dang camera.
>>1779232
Yet another un-level pic. Weird angle.
>>1779233
Man. You are all about jacked up angles. The idea behind this shot isn't back, but the composition is really awkward. >>1779237
Everything I've already said: cut off bottom, weird angle, not level.
>>1779238
Ken-tastic saturation. Typical, boring subject.
>>1779239
I don't hate this. The idea is fine. Obviously you know the execution sucks. Some people will rage about the centered horizon, but if you got the lines right it might have worked.
>>1779240
This is just a wreck of a shot. I feel like there might have been something interesting going on in this scene, but everything is out of focus, the exposure is screwed. There's zero thought to composition. It's a filthy scan.

Keep shooting, but try to put a lot more thought into what you're shooting. Don't just stop and think "Oooh! Pretty! I'll take a picture!" If something catches your eye, try to figure out what it is. Is it the lines? The architecture? The texture? The color? Figure out what the heck you're actually taking a picture of and then actually think through taking a picture of that thing.

Anonymous
11/16/12(Fri)12:02
No.1779279

Anonymous 11/16/12(Fri)12:02 No.1779279

>>1779273
I'll do that, thanks. I have an old scanner with no dust removal, but I'll do whatever I can manually. I've noticed myself that I cut off building bottoms, this is because my lens has a fixed focal lenght and I often have my back against the wall and it's still not satisfying, but I'll do what i can to correct this. The last shot was a wreck, I know, but I wanted to hear what more there is to be said about it.

Anonymous
11/17/12(Sat)10:40
No.1779931

Anonymous 11/17/12(Sat)10:40 No.1779931

Replies: >>1780032

Hey Lain, nice pictures. I think >>1775841 is my favorite. I don't know if you ever played the original Max Payne, but it reminds me of that game. Looks like they're getting hopped up on Valkyre and the kid on the left's motion blurred face reminds me of Jack Lupino from the movie. It's very dark. I like it.

>>1775893
Please find some other way to vent your frustrations with life. We don't need that kind of shit here.

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/17/12(Sat)13:12
No.1780032

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/17/12(Sat)13:12 No.1780032

>>1779188
So scanner softwar adjust your pics automatically?

Didn't know that, I though I would just suck with getting the real colors of the film.

>>1779931
thanks!
I only played the first few levels of it but I know what you mean

Anonymous
11/17/12(Sat)14:05
No.1780063

Anonymous 11/17/12(Sat)14:05 No.1780063

Replies: >>1780107

How much does the Paradies film cost?

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/17/12(Sat)15:47
No.1780107

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/17/12(Sat)15:47 No.1780107

>>1780063
1,65€ for 2 rolls

Anonymous
11/17/12(Sat)16:40
No.1780137

Anonymous 11/17/12(Sat)16:40 No.1780137

Replies: >>1780195

Some nice pics OP, I liked this one, but there are quite a few that I enjoyed.

>>1775860

Anonymous
11/17/12(Sat)17:31
No.1780183

Anonymous 11/17/12(Sat)17:31 No.1780183

Replies: >>1780187

Third time lucky...

>>1775839
>>1775837
>>1775836
>>1775833
>>1775832
How did you get that bleached effect on these ones?

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/17/12(Sat)17:38
No.1780187

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/17/12(Sat)17:38 No.1780187

File: 1353191896407.png-(9 KB, 291x264, Unbenannt.png)

>>1780177
>>1780181
>>1780183
brighten up

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU
11/17/12(Sat)17:49
No.1780195

LaiN !hdLs3tn0XU 11/17/12(Sat)17:49 No.1780195

>>1780137
not my pic btw

Camera-Specific Properties:

Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.1 (Windows)

Image-Specific Properties:

Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:11:12 22:59:05

Camera-Specific Properties:

Camera Software	QuickTime 7.6.6

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:11:11 00:34:15

Camera-Specific Properties:

Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 5.02S.003 2008.10.27

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	663

Camera-Specific Properties:

Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Width	6345
Image Height	9751
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:11:14 22:06:35
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	651
Image Height	1000

Camera-Specific Properties:

Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 60D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:11:15 00:02:24
Exposure Time	1/2 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	90.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

The next 4chan Q&A/PMQ session will be held on Sunday, November 18th at 8:00PM EST.I'm also taking questions/comments/feedback/random musings via e-mail at moot@4chan.org and on AIM at MOOTCHAT. Feel free to drop me a line or say hi!

The next 4chan Q&A/PMQ session will be held on Sunday, November 18th at 8:00PM EST.

I'm also taking questions/comments/feedback/random musings via e-mail at moot@4chan.org and on AIM at MOOTCHAT. Feel free to drop me a line or say hi!