| >> |
02/28/12(Tue)14:27 No.1539552>>1538867
Too
much roof, and I guess the speakers are the subject, yet they're too
small in the frame. Closer to the edge and aimed down more would've been
better I think.
>>1538869
Shit, blurry, no subject, underexposed.
>>1538873
Not
a fan of the blur, but I think you should have gotten the whole of her
streaks in the frame. They just lead your eye off the frame with nowhere
to go.
>>1538893
Cropped toilet distracts my eye.
>>1538904
Should've got the girl stepping onto the crossing, not off.
>>1538981
>>1538982
>>1538985
>>1538983
it'sfuckingnothing.jpg Also, cropped shadow. Nacht gut.
>>1538986
Why is there so much negative space? The subject should be larger.
>>1538990
Centered composition, boring subject.
>>1539015
Should've omitted the room on the left completely. Also, watch the crushed blacks on the right. Needs more contrast I think.
>>1539075
Looks like a snapshot. No thought given to lighting, background or pose. Don't watermark.
>>1539080
Looks
like she's chilling, which doesn't fit with the swimsuit. It's not
enough to just shoot a pretty girl and it's automatically good.
>>1539087
Colors are too wacky.
>>1539102
it'sfuckingnothing.jpg
>>1539105
Cropped
limbs, cropped limbs everywhere. Also, head. Unless this is a study on
backs, it's a pretty poor picture. Lack of face annoys me. Could've been
better even if that egg fwaahed wice symbol was not covered by her
hair.
>>1539215
>>1539219
The purpose of an ultrawide is not so you can include more sky, try and fill the new wideness with subject.
>>1539317
I
would have liked to have seen it without the mound on the right, so it
was a bit more symmetrical. Maybe closer and wider might have worked?
Nice though :)
That's all I can be bothered to do... |
