Posting mode: Reply
[Return] [Bottom]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
reCAPTCHA challenge image
 Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳
    • File: 1330369379.png-(185 KB, 500x500, Photo_Book.png)
    185 KB /p/ Photo Book - DO IT! BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)14:02 No.1538459  
    OK /p/
    It's time that the world seeing what the internet's greatest /p/hotography board is made of... and to add something to your coffee table.

    I am assembling a photo book made of entries entirely from /p/ lurkers, anons, trips, oldfags, newfags and even Alphon.

    1) The book will be sold at cost with no markup. No one makes money on this but the printer. Thinking of 8"x10" Landscape. Lengths based on entries. Shooting for $35.00 so it's affordable

    2) Anyone who submits a photo gets a photo in (unless it's an obvious troll) regardless of experience. This is for everyone.

    3) You get a choice of how you are recognized (anon, name, trip, name + trip) in the book

    4) Will move ahead with a minimum of 20 entries and a max of around 80 pages

    5) Nobody is going to steal your photo, you paranoid freak, you. This is for fun.

    Fucking do it. There's a form here where you can upload a photo and your contact information.

    https://cadenzamedia.wufoo.com/forms/m7p8s1/

    Go ahead - fucking do it!
    >> flippy !pENTaxY5Q. 02/27/12(Mon)14:06 No.1538460
    >>1538459
    Proof?
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/27/12(Mon)14:10 No.1538465
    What kind of paper will the images be printed on, and what ppi/resolution is ideal? Biggest as poss and 250ppi or something like that?

    Sounds like an great idea, I'm all for it. I'm surprised Project never organised a book to be made.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:14 No.1538468
    inb4 200 pictures of cats
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)14:18 No.1538471
    >>1538465
    8-bit JPEG, sRGB color space. The largest sized photos will be 8x10" but anything over 1800px on the longest size can be made to work.

    >>1538460
    Proof of what?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:20 No.1538474
    I'm down
    >> flippy !pENTaxY5Q. 02/27/12(Mon)14:21 No.1538475
    >>1538471
    Eh nevermind. Will be participating when I get off my drowsiness.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:26 No.1538478
    >Anyone who submits a photo gets a photo in
    Not interested. Make a book showcasing the *best* of /p/ and I'll buy it.
    >> rubber shoes in motion !FwDS1IFr.. 02/27/12(Mon)14:29 No.1538480
    I'm cool like a fool in a swimming PP PP P P Pool
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:30 No.1538481
    >>1538478
    Or maybe do two; one with everything and then from the total, use your judgement to whittle it down to the best (or take votes, but that could be a lot of effort).
    >> Pig !!Gpr9zA7h780 02/27/12(Mon)14:31 No.1538483
    inb4 square crop photo of a flower pot.
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/27/12(Mon)14:34 No.1538485
         File: 1330371262.jpg-(129 KB, 750x750, inspirational.jpg)
    129 KB
    >>1538483
    But it's so beautiful.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:35 No.1538487
         File: 1330371315.jpg-(1.01 MB, 2304x3072, Ignus Oppressum.jpg)
    1.01 MB
    >>1538485
    Superior.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:35 No.1538488
    inb4Eglington spams all of his telephoto trash and the whole book ends up with his shit.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:42 No.1538491
    very coool id feel non-worthy. <3
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)14:42 No.1538492
    >>1538488
    Max of 2 photos per person.

    By selecting certain obvious photos to have a full page, etc. there will be enough of a way to include everyone while keeping a few spotlights. I want to keep the curating to a minimum - as I don't have the time to crowdsource it or the eye to be good at it myself.
    >> chewie !uWookieV6A 02/27/12(Mon)14:43 No.1538493
    on it like a chicken bonnet
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:44 No.1538495
    >>1538492
    But the form only asks for one photo?
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)14:45 No.1538496
    I'll post updates and crap here:

    http://www.leica-boss.com/2012/02/photography-book-project/

    >>1538491
    You are worthy! In a few days, I may start a thread where you can post a few for people to comment on - help you edit / choose.
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/27/12(Mon)14:47 No.1538497
    >>1538495
    Click the lil thing that says "add another photo".
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)14:49 No.1538500
         File: 1330372174.jpg-(21 KB, 350x340, 2ndPhoto.jpg)
    21 KB
    >>1538495
    Answer "YES" to the question here (pic related) and the extra form for a 2nd photo appears.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:53 No.1538501
    >>1538500
    >1940-2012

    Dat ageism/time-travellerism
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:57 No.1538505
    What would the possibility be of us Britfags getting a copy of the book once its made? Could you ship them over here?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)14:58 No.1538507
    >>1538505
    obviously yes, but you'd pay more shipping


    The more important question is: why would anyone want a photobook full of /p/s crappy snapshits?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:03 No.1538509
    >>1538505
    This.
    You should pick a publisher that is available to ship to both 'murica and yurop (I assume it's where most of /p/ lives) without crazy shipping costs added.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:04 No.1538510
    >>1538507
    The same reason school yearbooks and calendars exist.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:04 No.1538511
    bj should accept payments to his paypal and then order the books bulk (discount?) and ship them himself.
    maybe a bit of work but, man, what does he have to do anyway.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:06 No.1538512
    What service will you be using BJ?
    I think blurb sends all over the world with decent S&H fees.
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/27/12(Mon)15:11 No.1538513
    People from similar locations could always buy together to save on postage costs, and just post the books locally.
    It's not ideal though, I guess.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)15:13 No.1538514
    >>1538512
    I was planning on Blurb. 8x10" standard photo book with perhaps the premium lustre paper. A pretty minimalist layout because I'm no designer. Placing the book into their "Market" without a markup.
    The volume discount isn't all too great to buy in bulk and sell - and I'd prefer not handing anybody's money.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)15:15 No.1538516
    >>1538514
    Shipping to Latvia is like $8.00 - so I'm thinking it'll be ok.
    >> chewie !uWookieV6A 02/27/12(Mon)15:16 No.1538518
    >>1538513
    a setup like blurb that prints depending on where the buyer is would be a good idea to keep costs down in the end. you can even use their own design software to autofill the book with selected shots, just whack in titles/credits and upload. no cost involved.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:21 No.1538520
    >>1538518
    I think it would be preferable to fill manually.
    Like BJ said, spotlighting the better photos.

    A poll wouldn't be a bad idea but it's prone to cheating
    >> OiD !c4MhzmU2ao 02/27/12(Mon)15:28 No.1538524
         File: 1330374502.jpg-(297 KB, 1200x800, _MG_4840.jpg)
    297 KB
    Sounds interesting. What is obvious troll like material? Is there a minimum quality requirement? Maybe we could get a voting system if the book hits 80 pictures?

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> chewie !uWookieV6A 02/27/12(Mon)15:29 No.1538525
    boom done.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:32 No.1538531
    >>1538525
    Did you put a personal statement / motto / derpism?
    >> chewie !uWookieV6A 02/27/12(Mon)15:44 No.1538544
    >>1538531
    no, I don't really have one at the moment other than I shoot for my own enjoyment, fuck the haters. If bjdrew wants to add that then thats cool but whatever
    >> Baristagrapher !!b/Qsng9kMK5 02/27/12(Mon)15:45 No.1538545
    Submitted.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:48 No.1538552
    >>1538549

    Oh snap! Submitted btw.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:52 No.1538553
    >>1538524

    I like this idea. Also when is the cut-off date for submissions?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:53 No.1538554
    Holy shit, the janitor is back?!

    Are you also going to delete/ban the nudes and photoshop(r)'s links like the last time?
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)15:54 No.1538555
    >>1538524
    Cellphone photo of dog's ass = troll photo
    (Unless it's HDR. Then it's art)
    But even if it means a few photos on some pages, we'll get everyone in. If one day a "best of" book seems possible, then maybe some more crowd-curation would be ok.
    >> frimfram 02/27/12(Mon)15:54 No.1538556
    i bit...
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:55 No.1538558
    Blowjob, are you gonna be able to ship the book to Brazil so I can join?

    (Attention janitor: this is not a troll post, please don't delete it)
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:56 No.1538559
    >>1538554
    Will try not to delete non-porn nudes but would prefer if OP images be SFW.
    Know better than to delete legit links.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)15:57 No.1538560
    French beginner here, submitted too. I'm following this.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)15:58 No.1538561
    >>1538558
    http://www.blurb.com/create/book/shipping

    Brazil = ok
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:00 No.1538562
    >>1538555
    You should at least curate to some point. Choose better ones to appear bigger (perhaps 1 per page) and the real bad ones all together with the others.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:00 No.1538563
    Well, I submitted a photo.

    Hope it goes well.

    I'm just hoping this isn't some elaborate trap.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:00 No.1538564
    >>1538468
    FUND IT.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:02 No.1538566
    >>1538562
    >Choose better ones to appear bigger (perhaps 1 per page) and the real bad ones all together with the others
    He's already doing that.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:03 No.1538567
    >>1538563
    Also, submitted it at 300ppi, I hope this is not a problem.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:04 No.1538568
    >>1538563
    What exactly what he be trapping? Worst case scenario, he uploads your photo to a stock image site to try and make money from it? Your photos are not that good anyway.
    >> koowi 02/27/12(Mon)16:11 No.1538571
    >>1538568
    >Worst case scenario, he uploads your photo to a stock image site to try and make money from it? Your photos are not that good anyway.
    Nope, BJD only gets the rights to publish your photo on a book, that will be sold at cost.

    >By making a photo submission, you are agreeing to three things:
    >[...]
    >2) That you give permission for these images to be used for the purpose of a photography book that will be published and sold. The book will be sold at cost

    Indeed captcha, analtut treatise.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)16:12 No.1538572
         File: 1330377126.jpg-(23 KB, 277x360, admiral-ackbar-ole-miss-bigger(...).jpg)
    23 KB
    >>1538567
    No problem. Thanks.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:12 No.1538573
    Contribootin for the heck of it.
    I hope it doesnt cost a !"£$ load of cash to send it to Britain.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:15 No.1538574
    >>1538572
    Cool.

    Can't wait to see the result. :)

    (let's just hope I have money to order one when it's ready)
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:18 No.1538578
    Hey BJ, will you take bribes to make my photo the book cover?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:20 No.1538579
    >>1538459
    Have a couple of rolls that need to be dev'd and I'm a little worried I won't be able to submit anything =\

    When's the deadline?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:21 No.1538580
    When is the limit to submit photos?
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)16:24 No.1538582
    >>1538578
    Yes. I accept bribes. I want an M9. Outside that, the cover will be text.
    >>1538580
    >>1538579
    Take your time. there's no rush.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:26 No.1538584
    Should I just upload the image as I have it saved, and you'll do the cropping and resizing/resampling?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:27 No.1538585
    >>1538584
    lr2nread tehre'll be no editing on bart's side
    >> Bowlerfag !Finch/Ag9c 02/27/12(Mon)16:29 No.1538587
    The shots I uploaded had adobe rgb profiles, will that be an issue?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:30 No.1538588
    What if a photo is really really bad, like >>1538583?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:31 No.1538589
    Question: I live in Estonia, EU. Will I be able to get a physical copy if this works out? I will submit 3 pictures
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:32 No.1538591
    >>1538589
    yes, read the read.
    and no, 2 per person.
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/27/12(Mon)16:34 No.1538592
    Sharpening for print?

    Idiot's guide to prepping an image for this? ._.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:35 No.1538595
    Dammit, people, why don't you just check the site for shipping information?

    >http://www.blurb.com/create/book/shipping

    Blurb ships to the following countries and territories:
    Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guam, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macao, Malaysia, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Micronesia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Northern Mariana Islands, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Vietnam, Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands (British)

    Due to service limitations we may not be able to deliver to outlying regions not already listed above -- (e.g., Canary Islands, Channel Islands, etc.). Any local duties, customs, and taxes that apply must be paid by the recipient upon delivery. For addresses in more remote locations, please add additional time for delivery whether you've chosen Economy, Priority, or Express.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:36 No.1538596
    I hope you enjoy real ART BJDrew.
    My picture will be a great addition, hell, it will be the main piece of the book.
    I'm sure you'll see which one it is when you see it.
    I even rescanned it with my ghettorig just for you, you better show some gratitude.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:37 No.1538599
    4x5 anon here.
    I only had a 800pix long version of the photo I submitted. If you want it in the book let me know before Saturday (off overseas for a while) and I'll rescan it and send it to you.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)16:37 No.1538601
    >>1538589
    See: http://www.leica-boss.com/2012/02/photography-book-project/
    There's an FAQ and link to the shipping page at Blurb

    >>1538584
    >>1538585
    I won't be editing images

    >>1538587
    Hard to say - but I have email addresses. If a problem pops up, I'll message and ask for a new version.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)16:38 No.1538604
    >>1538599
    I do - and it'd be great if you could. Send via e-mail to bart@leica-boss.com.
    >> koowi 02/27/12(Mon)16:38 No.1538605
    >>1538592
    Don't worry about it, just submit your photo and let BJD do all the magic.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:39 No.1538607
    >>1538601
    What I meant was, the photo is not going to fit the dimensions of the page - should I add borders to make it match 8x10?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:45 No.1538609
         File: 1330379103.jpg-(3.88 MB, 3888x2592, IMG_9969.jpg)
    3.88 MB
    Is this a worthy one? I just submitted it

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:46 No.1538612
    >>1538609
    Oh fuck, there's no way I'm buying this book...
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:49 No.1538616
    >>1538609
    I really hope BJ categorises this as a troll submission...
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/27/12(Mon)16:50 No.1538617
    >>1538605
    Now that I look at it, Lightroom has a 'sharpen for...' facility with 'screen', 'matte paper' and 'glossy paper'. I'm guessing glossy with 'standard'? The image itself has no sharpening applied from my side anyway.

    I'd like to minimize work on his part (I mean, he's said he's not going to edit images a few times already, but just in case).
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:56 No.1538619
    How many entries so far, blowjob?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)16:56 No.1538620
    PROTIP: Nobody will like any picture in this book. /p/ is for dissension, bickering, butthurt, and nothing else.
    >> Gehraz !aSC400nFNA 02/27/12(Mon)17:01 No.1538623
         File: 1330380078.jpg-(42 KB, 1023x682, November182010003.jpg)
    42 KB
    I submitted two at around 1000x600 res.
    Hope thats big enough

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)17:02 No.1538624
    >>1538617
    Yeah - I'm not gonna touch 'em. something like a 1.2px radius and 10-40% depending on the image will suffice or LR sharpening for print - standard will be ok.
    >>1538619
    Just hit 20.
    >>1538620
    Says you.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)17:04 No.1538627
    >>1538623
    Can squeeze a 5" wide print from that probably.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)17:05 No.1538628
    I was about to ask a preview of the book online, but as >>1538620 pointed, it would probably just make everybody rage.
    >> proxiee 02/27/12(Mon)17:08 No.1538629
         File: 1330380484.jpg-(128 KB, 900x775, Escher_II_by_honolo.jpg)
    128 KB
    I'm on my phone, but here is mine. Put it under Black, G.T.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)17:08 No.1538630
    >>1538628
    you can take a look at it on blurb once it's finished
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)17:09 No.1538631
         File: 1330380592.jpg-(989 KB, 1920x1280, _MG_0417.jpg)
    989 KB
    At the least, someone looking at my pic on this site is enough for me.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)17:11 No.1538633
    >>1538629
    Take your time. You can submit when you get to a computer. I'm pretty sure I'd lose any submissions not made through the form.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)17:25 No.1538639
         File: 1330381527.jpg-(51 KB, 960x640, 303735_169630489789061_1000022(...).jpg)
    51 KB
    here is a second I submitted :D I really like some of the entries here already. Cant wait for the book to be assembled :D
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)17:26 No.1538643
    >>1538629
    The colors are so nice!
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/27/12(Mon)17:34 No.1538648
    The form broke the first time I tried submitting, resulting in one of two files getting through and landing with a listed size of 0kb, so I'm resubmitting (ones with a file-info size 300dpi setting).

    So much for causing BJDrew less work :/
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)17:43 No.1538654
    i tried using the freak amazing detail action to sharpen but it looked like a pseudo hdr with weird halos
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)17:52 No.1538659
         File: 1330383126.jpg-(413 KB, 1000x687, untitled.jpg)
    413 KB
    >>1538654
    Ha - that's not for output sharpening and can get out of hand quickly if you increase the radius too much! This one got the Freaky Amazing Detail treatment a little.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Sakura !RoX2SAkURA!!3iOG6mbYys6 02/27/12(Mon)18:07 No.1538668
    I'm game.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)18:10 No.1538674
    >>1538668
    Who the fuck are you?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)18:15 No.1538678
    >>1538674
    the longest tripcode on 4chan champion, apparently
    >> Sakura !RoX2SAkURA!!3iOG6mbYys6 02/27/12(Mon)18:23 No.1538688
         File: 1330385024.jpg-(636 KB, 890x900, IMG002-Edit.jpg)
    636 KB
    >>1538678
    >>1538674
    I've lurked /p/ for a few years using this trip, but I very rarely post - think I've started fewer than half-a-dozen threads in the last year. I posted this a few weeks ago & got largely positive response, so I figured I would submit.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)18:26 No.1538691
    >>1538688
    >lurk using trip
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)18:27 No.1538692
    >>1538688
    This better be full page.
    >> Sakura !RoX2SAkURA!!3iOG6mbYys6 02/27/12(Mon)18:28 No.1538694
    >>1538691
    Okay, lurk was the wrong word. I meant that I've been visiting /p/ multiple times a day for a few years, but very rarely post.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)18:50 No.1538710
    Submitted. How do i get a trip?
    >> I'm a trip !hEpdoZ.tHU 02/27/12(Mon)18:51 No.1538711
    >>1538710
    name #trip
    >> valium !!UjWIodEjyr1 02/27/12(Mon)18:57 No.1538713
    >tasteful nudes
    girldridingdildo.jpg
    >> !hEpdoZ.tHU 02/27/12(Mon)18:58 No.1538714
    trip test
    >> frim !y6N8A6k6y. 02/27/12(Mon)18:58 No.1538716
    when do you think the book will be done btw?
    >> JakeH !hEpdoZ.tHU 02/27/12(Mon)18:59 No.1538717
    Sweet, it worked.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:01 No.1538719
    This sounds like a lot of fun. Will we at least have a month to submit a photo? I don't have anything I like right now, but I should be able to come up with something.
    >> valium !!UjWIodEjyr1 02/27/12(Mon)19:04 No.1538720
         File: 1330387497.jpg-(210 KB, 600x456, 1281774462199.jpg)
    210 KB
    >>1538713
    I can't seem to find that fucking image

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:11 No.1538728
         File: 1330387871.jpg-(737 KB, 1200x1600, 1287352196720.jpg)
    737 KB
    >>1538720

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:18 No.1538732
    >>1538728
    >>1538728
    NO!!! If shit like this will be in the album book I will never buy it
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:21 No.1538733
    >>1538728
    I didn't get it when it was still being posted all over /p/, I still don't get it now.
    >> rubber shoes in motion !FwDS1IFr.. 02/27/12(Mon)19:22 No.1538734
         File: 1330388522.jpg-(7 KB, 251x223, 1321220227862.jpg)
    7 KB
    wait, are you going to be cropping people's photos to make them fit 8x10?

    because fuck all that shit, son.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> rubber shoes in motion !FwDS1IFr.. 02/27/12(Mon)19:23 No.1538737
    >>1538733

    I thought the dildo was shopped in during that period when it was being posted every 5 seconds.. Oh the horror when I found out I had it backwards.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:28 No.1538739
    >>1538728
    >>1538733
    >>1538737
    Why the fuck does it mater? Its the worse kind of hipstershit. If OP lets it in I will lose hope for humanity
    >> NatureGuy !!tg3hbUo06u8 02/27/12(Mon)19:45 No.1538749
         File: 1330389936.jpg-(602 KB, 667x1000, 06_23_2009_250_LR.jpg)
    602 KB
    I'm down for this shit. Update your blog more.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)19:54 No.1538753
    >>1538732
    Images like that will not be in the book. But you can see them on /p/
    >>1538734
    I won't be cropping anyone's precious snowflakes - just sized to fit the pages.

    >>1538749
    Excellent. And yeah, I'll blog more in upcoming weeks.
    >> rubber shoes in motion !FwDS1IFr.. 02/27/12(Mon)19:58 No.1538760
    >>1538753

    Then I'm in this shit like sin. Just don't sell my arts for the mad cash without my say so kk?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:58 No.1538762
    How much will it cost to ship to Europe? (assuming it will ship outside the US)
    What resolution do you want the picture?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)19:59 No.1538763
    >>1538753
    Are there anything else you'll be adding other than a 2 pic per person section?
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:00 No.1538766
    >>1538762
    just check the website lazy faggot
    >> valium !!UjWIodEjyr1 02/27/12(Mon)20:03 No.1538769
    >>1538732
    >>1538733
    >>1538739
    2deep4u
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/27/12(Mon)20:13 No.1538777
    >>1538760
    No penguins will be harmed in the production of this book-and no profit will be made

    >>1538763
    >>1538762
    Look at the site. Remember, you may submit 2 photos, but only one may be selected.
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/27/12(Mon)20:19 No.1538782
         File: 1330391999.jpg-(192 KB, 500x458, 1309957428975.jpg)
    192 KB
    >>1538760
    You forgot the 'fine' bit.

    Also, $18 to ship to where I live :/
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:23 No.1538786
    >>1538782
    6€ here, not too shabby
    >implying i'm gonna buy it
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:30 No.1538789
         File: 1330392653.jpg-(465 KB, 1024x683, 5730009834_b947fd9564_b[1].jpg)
    465 KB
    >>1538766
    >>1538777

    Sorry for being retarded. Anyways submitted my entry.

    Also 6€ only for shipping, I will definitively buy it.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:36 No.1538791
    >>1538524
    >>1538609
    >>1538629
    >>1538639
    >>1538631
    >>1538789
    i have the feeling this book is going to suck.
    >> rubber shoes in motion !FwDS1IFr.. 02/27/12(Mon)20:38 No.1538792
         File: 1330393118.jpg-(29 KB, 640x480, 1293168734750.jpg)
    29 KB
    >>1538777
    DESTROY ALL FILES UPON UPLOAD COMPLETION
    >> Jokke_r !darIyNTbjA 02/27/12(Mon)20:46 No.1538798
         File: 1330393580.jpg-(649 KB, 1000x667, IMG_1620.jpg)
    649 KB
    Right, submitted this piece of crap, albeit a slightly different edit.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:46 No.1538799
    >>1538789
    >definitively
    you're either spanish or portuguese

    what did you shoot that with, looks pretty good
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:47 No.1538800
    >>1538798
    shit looks surreal
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:49 No.1538801
    Submitted these two. Quite excited about this.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/zaygphoto/6671020929/in/photostream

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/zaygphoto/6872379663/in/photostream/
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:49 No.1538802
    >>1538800
    >shit looks like shit
    FTFY
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)20:52 No.1538804
    >>1538799

    Nice guess, I'm spanish.

    Took it with a D3100 and the 18-105. Or babbys first DSLR if you prefer.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)22:53 No.1538872
    I couldn't take part in the trading Can I be part of this?
    >> pechi 02/27/12(Mon)23:07 No.1538876
         File: 1330402062.gif-(32 KB, 350x300, 1326247711431.gif)
    32 KB
    >>1538872
    Nope. You prolly smell like cheap liquor and hand sanitizer...
    >> NatureGuy !!tg3hbUo06u8 02/27/12(Mon)23:08 No.1538877
    If you don't use the photo I sent you for the cover I;ll be disappointed but I'll understand.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)23:19 No.1538883
         File: 1330402740.jpg-(98 KB, 800x474, imagebin9.jpg)
    98 KB


    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)23:22 No.1538884
         File: 1330402931.jpg-(126 KB, 800x712, imagebin10.jpg)
    126 KB
    even if it's 8x10 landscape, leave the white space around, boyo

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Bassackwards !.EEeeEEEEE 02/27/12(Mon)23:24 No.1538886
    in the interest of quality control, i will not submit an image for this book.
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)23:30 No.1538889
         File: 1330403402.jpg-(164 KB, 800x800, imagebin11.jpg)
    164 KB
    goddam why is it so cold here

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/27/12(Mon)23:31 No.1538891
    >>1538883

    >>1538884
    Damn tedious

    neat-o
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)00:13 No.1538916
    >>1538485
    Can someone explain this to me?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)00:17 No.1538920
    >>1538916
    picture of a photo of a still life, with an emphasis on presentation aesthetics, rather than content.

    nothing special, move along
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)00:18 No.1538921
    >>1538916
    its a brutal commentary on the whole of western civilization.
    >>1538920
    you don't know jack shit kid, move along now
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)00:40 No.1538952
    >that feel when I don't really have anything I think is book worthy

    Well, guess I better go shooting tomorrow.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)00:42 No.1538953
         File: 1330407736.jpg-(587 KB, 900x675, IMG_02562 smaller .jpg)
    587 KB
    Here's a picture I took back in April, It's actually one of the first pictures I took that came out not shitty.
    >> Moot 02/28/12(Tue)00:49 No.1538960
    where is alphon?
    >> alphon 02/28/12(Tue)01:01 No.1538971
    the beta peabrains have proven incapable of appreciating my fine art photography so I will not post.
    >> Moot 02/28/12(Tue)01:06 No.1538975
    >>1538971
    lol :>
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)01:32 No.1538994
    >>1538459
    >Anyone who submits a photo gets a photo in

    >>1538492
    >I want to keep the curating to a minimum

    I'm sorry OP, but this is going to turn out fucking awful. The only value it will have is making some /p/eople happy for being in something and a general sense of community.
    That's nice and all, but it'd be a godawful art book, the only people who'd buy it or appreciate it would be people who got in or some extra circlejerky members of the community.

    splitting into two posts because system thinks my post is spam.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)01:33 No.1538996
    >>1538994

    I'm not saying it's because you have to only include the best of the best, but to even give it the chance of not being a steaming pile of shit, you're going to need some standard and you're DEFINITELY going to need curation.

    Especially with such the low/nonexistent standard you want, you're going to need to put some thought into the order and format of it.

    Just because the photography is a halfassed pile of shit doesn't mean the art book has to be, but if you curate it with the same amateurism that most of the submissions will be, it will even bring down the decent shots.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)03:00 No.1539063
         File: 1330416041.jpg-(340 KB, 618x1000, IMG_0140.jpg)
    340 KB
    I submitted a purple tree. I suggest you do too.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> chewie !uWookieV6A 02/28/12(Tue)03:17 No.1539076
    >>1538459
    this book will need some sort of moderation. Do it all yourself and fuck anyone else and what they think of you, if you think the pic is troll or just poor/shit then don't use it. Just be objective. If you start getting into group moderation then it will turn out to be a shitfest and won't get anywhere. that's exactly what happened in the last one. that, and soulr was being a faggot about the whole thing.
    >> chewie !uWookieV6A 02/28/12(Tue)03:21 No.1539078
    >>1539076
    also, all these faggots saying it will be shit and won't sell at all, who cares? where did anyone say it will be a proper showcase or piece of art. all BJDrew has said is it that it will be a collection of photos from /p/. get over yourselves, If you want to make a book to sell at your local art fair and become locally successful do it yourself, there are no costs involved up until actually ordering a copy.
    >> Gerhart !!Er2kRZDPVFx 02/28/12(Tue)04:25 No.1539119
    Submitting a couple of pictures as soon as I get home, BJ.

    This is fun.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)04:38 No.1539122
    YOU SHOULD REALLY NOT ALLOW SHITTY ONES, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO VOTE

    then i'll submit my shitty one
    >> !gebkr!g7:*- 02/28/12(Tue)04:47 No.1539128
    I really want this to work homies, don't fight.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)04:57 No.1539130
    >>1539076
    Yeah I'm still a little annoyed the last one really didn't amount to much. There was just too much crap going on and I think it got to the point where we just left it simmer in it's own pile of shit.
    Bit of a shame. Maybe one day I'll resurrect the zine idea.
    Which is another thing to consider, Bart. Magcloud instead of Blurb. Would make it cheaper to buy and once you have the template set up you can make another one in 6-12 months time pretty easy.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:00 No.1539132
    >>1539122
    This won't work. It's been tried in the past. Picture /p/ trying to organise something. It's exactly that bad of an idea.
    It just needs 1-2 people to take it by the horns and do it, no matter how many scrubs it pisses off.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:16 No.1539136
    >>1539132
    Maybe a year ago we developed a "/p/ porfolio". A zip file with works from nearly every trip and a dickload of anons. It worked out great, there were no snags, someone uploaded the zip to mediashare or something, I turned it. Into a torrent, and me and at least 2 dozen others seeded it for quite some time.

    I see no reason why you'd think this wouldn't go just as smoothly, especially with the ravishingly handsome BJDrew at the helm.
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/28/12(Tue)05:18 No.1539137
    >>1539132
    Could get everyone's moms and their friends to vote on it.
    Wouldn't be biased at all!

    As for those wondering who would want to buy this, if you need to wonder about that, then this book is simply not for you, and your submission would not be missed.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:19 No.1539138
    >>1539136
    That didn't require any voting though, it was a case of everyone submitting their best stuff, exactly as they are now.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:24 No.1539140
    >>1539136
    That was a folder with no limit to what could be in it. Not a book with limited space nor a highlight of the quality of /p/. Completely different things.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:24 No.1539141
    >>1539136
    i gotta say, i loved that thing
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:27 No.1539143
    >>1539136
    Where can I find this?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:27 No.1539144
         File: 1330424859.jpg-(479 KB, 600x1100, 1320021113421.jpg)
    479 KB
    ok so BJDrew does the first rough selection round to filter trolls and shit, then emails all chosen ones a link to a site where they can rate the pictures which will ultimately decide how large and which page etc they will appear on in order of popularity. the voting page of course requires you to enter you valid email address BJDrew already has so you can only cast a vote once.
    after that the results will be mailed to Ken Rockwell who will do the final selection and create the picturebook

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:27 No.1539145
    Ah, neat idea! Will there be a maximum of entries? If not I will submit, but I am a noob and do not want to consume a nice page. Would be neat if this all comes together.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:35 No.1539149
    >>1539143
    https://rapidshare.com/files/3360647489/p.ortfolio.zip
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:35 No.1539150
    >>1538459
    Hey OP. Feel free to message me about the use of my photos. But otherwise feel free to choose one. Send me a message on flickr.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/charlesraben
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:38 No.1539151
    >>1539150
    You're supposed to submit a photo (or two), he's not going to look through your stream. But I just did look through it, and your photos suck, so please don't submit.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)05:40 No.1539152
    >>1539149
    thanks
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/28/12(Tue)08:57 No.1539270
    44 individuals participating so far. Lots of good stuff.

    Alphon does not even need to submit a photo to have the best photo in the book... but will probably submit.
    >>1538872
    Of course.
    >>1538877
    At the least, it will kick off the Preface/Introduction. I have contacted Ken Rockwell to write it. This is not a joke.
    >>1538886
    All photos will have a border
    >>1538884
    Please submit brosef. Whats-a-mattah-wit-u!?
    >>1538996
    Dude. This is for fun. Let loose a little. Of course there will be a little thought in the layout, but. The community piece is the cool part. I am sure this will not be the world"s greatest art book. But it may be among my favorites.
    >>1539150
    Just hold your breath, pick one... and submit!

    As for voting. Not this time around. Maybe a serious book would be good in the future, but this is not that project.
    >> Pig !!Gpr9zA7h780 02/28/12(Tue)09:16 No.1539286
    Any idea on the deadline for submissions? You going first come first served or?
    >> Gerhart !!Er2kRZDPVFx 02/28/12(Tue)09:20 No.1539289
    >>1539270
    >I have contacted Ken Rockwell to write it. This is not a joke.

    Given his sense of humor and how of a troll he is, I wouldn't be surprised if the book ends up featured on his website.
    Which would be awesome, nonetheless.
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/28/12(Tue)09:24 No.1539290
    People who are hating on the book already: Just submit a photo, you can tell people you're a published photographer and you wont be lying.
    It's the most any of us will ever achieve with photography in our lives I expect.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)09:45 No.1539300
    >>1539290
    >you can tell people you're a published photographer and you wont be lying
    And you're fucked when a client asks to see the book.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:00 No.1539310
    >>1539300

    That is, if you ever get a client.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:01 No.1539311
    >>1539289
    >I wouldn't be surprised if the book ends up featured on his website.
    That would make my time here in /p/ completely worthwhile, if for nothing other than the monumental butthurt which would ensue.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:02 No.1539312
         File: 1330441354.jpg-(12 KB, 281x236, okayguy.jpg)
    12 KB
    >get excited to submit a photo
    >realize everything i've ever shot is shit
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:03 No.1539314
    >>1539310
    >client
    What are these "clients" of which you speak? Do you mean the customers are the restaurant where I wait tables to pay for my totally serious photography hobby?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:17 No.1539321
         File: 1330442259.jpg-(242 KB, 800x600, scholargentleman.jpg)
    242 KB
    I actually don't hate this thread, OP. Nice job.
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/28/12(Tue)10:27 No.1539329
    >>1539310
    This anon got the joke.

    >>1539300
    This anon did not.


    BJ, how many entries have you had so far?
    >> pechita 02/28/12(Tue)10:30 No.1539332
         File: 1330443013.jpg-(432 KB, 1000x1000, gzh9skzx.jpg)
    432 KB
    >>1539290
    >you can tell people you're a published photographer and you wont be lying.
    >mfw I'm going to tell people my photo was published on a fine art photobook
    I'm not looking for 'clients' anyways lol

    >>1539312
    What's your problem, scumfag? Too beta to submit your fine art? Don't be a pussy and send your best shot to BJD.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:45 No.1539342
    How long will you keep th submition preocess up? I'm shooting some nice things in 2 weeks, is this too late?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)10:47 No.1539344
    Challenge accepted, I know somewhere somehow there are two photos of mine than don't suck
    >> Mr.L.P 02/28/12(Tue)11:04 No.1539360
    Will there be another one of these books at some point. I would love to see more of these projects about.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:08 No.1539362
         File: 1330445286.jpg-(516 KB, 1500x1000, 16498.jpg)
    516 KB
    Due /p/'s attitude towards hdr my photo might be considered as a trollpic. But I like it and would be really happy to see it in /p/'s Photo Book.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> yondo !!7O0I3X9WiOY 02/28/12(Tue)11:17 No.1539370
         File: 1330445866.jpg-(340 KB, 1000x800, DSC_0114_1.jpg)
    340 KB
    Couldn't decide on a good photo, so I figured this one kind of fit into the /p/ theme.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:31 No.1539376
    >>1539362
    Wouldn't mind seeing the original to that. I like industrial landscapes.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:40 No.1539381
    >>1539376
    original like "fullsize" or original like "without pp"?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:42 No.1539383
    >>1539381
    .. Without the HDR.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:50 No.1539386
    >>1539362
    I hate HDR as much as the next /p/hellow, but this isn't that bad. It's still an eyesore, but it almost fits the subject. Some tasteful tone mapping might have made this a great picture.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:53 No.1539389
         File: 1330448028.jpg-(401 KB, 1500x1000, IMG_6498nohdr.jpg)
    401 KB
    >>1539383
    Here. I think it looks too "flat" but I'm happy with the composition.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)11:59 No.1539393
         File: 1330448359.jpg-(452 KB, 1000x667, 938456923845629345.jpg)
    452 KB
    >>1539389
    I think it's much better than the HDR. If it looks flat, just mess around with the contrast for specific ranges with the curves.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)12:24 No.1539409
    >>1539393
    >>1539362

    HDR is bad and you should feel bad.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)12:35 No.1539419
    >>1539409
    hdr is not bad
    if its done right
    and alot cant do hdr right
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)12:36 No.1539422
    >>1539389
    The original is a thousand times better...

    If you really think it looks flat, see >>1539393
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:26 No.1539475
         File: 1330453603.jpg-(250 KB, 1024x683, 6518103739_9413980b19_b.jpg)
    250 KB
    >>1539362
    Dude, you should submit this one instead.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:38 No.1539486
    >>1539419
    HDR is like post vignetting. If you can tell it's there, then it's bad.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:46 No.1539492
    >>1539486
    Autotune is a better comparison. You're not supposed to hear it - it was originally to correct the pitch of singers' voices undetected. However, one day someone did it wrong and came out with the electronic-sounding voice that is now prevalent in hip-hop. Some people actually like the effect, while anyone with more sophisticated musical tastes thinks it's fucking awful.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:52 No.1539505
    >>1539475
    He should submit both.

    >>1539486
    I actually like post vignetting. I like the way it tweaks colors and keeps the whole image from looking too plain. Also draws eyes to your subject.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:55 No.1539508
    >>1539492
    This. Probably the best comparison I've read, and you have exactly the same sort of debate raging. Used to very mild effect HDR can bring out details that would otherwise be lost in challenging lighting situations. Used in a heavy-handed manor, you can achieve a very artificial, but possibly desirable, effect. I for one prefer the HDR version of the factory image. But then, I also like the heavy autotune effect in pop music.

    same ddMusi
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:56 No.1539510
    >>1539505
    There's nothing wrong with vignetting per se. But if you look at a picture and immediately think "wow, they added a bunch of vignetting" then it's too much.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:58 No.1539511
    When Is the deadline? I got some 35mm shots which I would need to rescan at a higher resolution.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)13:58 No.1539512
    >>1539508
    >I also like the heavy autotune effect in pop music.
    I really hope this was some reverse psychology employed to make the guy realize how horrible HDR can be.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:00 No.1539515
         File: 1330455635.jpg-(1.51 MB, 1500x1053, goodornot.jpg)
    1.51 MB
    I do macro mainly and love the idea of having a /p/ book.
    Is this good enough to be submitted or should I shoot myself?

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:06 No.1539522
    >>1539512
    No, it was simple honesty. I enjoy being shocked a bit by what I see in a photograph, and heavy HDR can be used to arrest your attention. I don't expect you to like heavy HDR, just as I wouldn't expect you to like anything else. Hell, you might not like Andy Warhol because he "tried to hard" or "the effect is obvious". Others love his work and collect it as art. There will be people (like you) who will always dislike obviously imposed "effects" such as HDR, cross-processing, etc. That is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. Just don't think that your opinion is ever anything more than just that: opinion.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:10 No.1539526
    >>1539515
    I feel like that photo would be helped with some context. What are we looking at?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:18 No.1539535
    >>1539475

    I've already thought about that, but thers so much black in this picture and i don't really know how it will look when printed. I have a posterprint of the hdr and it looks nice. Also, I like the hdr one more.

    I already submitted two pics so i can't submit the one you like. Is possible to change pics?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:18 No.1539536
         File: 1330456722.jpg-(145 KB, 454x370, to-the-manor-born.jpg)
    145 KB
    >>1539508
    >heavy-handed manor

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:19 No.1539538
    >>1539535
    Well I think you should put it in, but you don't have to. Just email BJDrew if you do decide to switch one.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:20 No.1539539
    >>1539536
    I like your manor. Remember to mind your manners at dinner.
    >> Mr.NiceGuy !3SfloA2uBI 02/28/12(Tue)14:29 No.1539558
    How should we write our trips to appear?

    Should I put it as "Mr.NiceGuy" or "Mr.NiceGuy !3SfloA2uBI"?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:34 No.1539564
    >>1539558
    How is he gonna know your trip if you just put "Mr. Niceguy"?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:34 No.1539565
    >>1539558
    do you even know what a trip is?
    >> Mr.NiceGuy !3SfloA2uBI 02/28/12(Tue)14:43 No.1539571
    >>1539564
    Because I didn't know if he wants the tripcode next to our name we use. I thought just the trip name would look cleaner. But nevermind.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:45 No.1539573
    >>1539571
    Hey, you just gave me a great idea: I think I'm going to spam pictures of my balls using rubber's trip until BJ eventually falls for it.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)14:56 No.1539581
    Questions:

    1) What if someone really old like Bass took a picture before 1940? Why can't the year form accept them?

    2) If I leave the title field blank, is the picture really going to be called Untitield? If so, nice one. 10/10.
    >> rubber shoes in motion !FwDS1IFr.. 02/28/12(Tue)14:57 No.1539582
    >>1539573

    >implying BJ doesn't already know my balls inside and out
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/28/12(Tue)15:35 No.1539609
         File: 1330461312.jpg-(97 KB, 544x593, how_can_you_really_know_someth(...).jpg)
    97 KB
    >>1539582
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)15:57 No.1539632
    I done did it.
    >> Proxiee !PentaxZeDo 02/28/12(Tue)16:27 No.1539677
    sadly my entry will be 1000px on the longest side. I no longer have any of my photos, and everything I have has to be pulled from the internet.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:29 No.1539681
    What size are people uploading their photo's? Full size? or resized?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:37 No.1539693
         File: 1330465021.jpg-(529 KB, 1094x729, IMG_7509resize.jpg)
    529 KB
    I submitted this. Not the greatest, but it's the best I have.

    [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:40 No.1539703
    >>1539681
    >>1539677
    If you read the instructions, I believe something to the effect of 1800px max, longest side... could be misinterpreting that, though.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:47 No.1539717
    >>1539511
    >>1539511
    >>1539511
    can someone answer me this?
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/28/12(Tue)16:48 No.1539720
    >>1539703
    Bigger the better. 1800px minimum on a side.

    A 1000px/side image will likely be around 3" wide in the book. Maybe 4". that's fine, we can make it work - but higher res is preferred.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/28/12(Tue)16:50 No.1539725
    >>1539511
    No deadline - but there are 55 people in right now.
    It'll definitely go through the weekend.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:55 No.1539731
    >>1539720
    oh well fuck... can I / Should I reupload? I resized to 1800px longest side... balls...
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/28/12(Tue)16:57 No.1539734
    >>1539720
    The form seems to reject images over ~12mp, though.
    Either that or a filesize limit. I had to try submitting five times till I simply settled on 3k on long at 300dpi, seeing as you said the book will be 10" on its longest anyway.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/28/12(Tue)16:57 No.1539735
    >>1539731
    1800 will be fine. I'm sure reuploading creates the risk I fuck something up and forget to include either photo - I'm pretty absentminded.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:58 No.1539737
    >>1539725
    >No deadline - but there are 55 people in right now.
    >It'll definitely go through the weekend.
    Do you have some sort of lose target you're shooting for? If we've already got 55 in a day's time, then by the weekend we'll have hundreds.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:58 No.1539739
    >>1539725
    if there is no deadline is there an entry limit? because it would take me 1-3 days to get my photo scanned
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)16:58 No.1539740
    >>1539735
    Okay. If it turns out to be too short, lemme know.
    >> BJDrew !!LkyLqEm9G0v 02/28/12(Tue)16:59 No.1539743
    >>1539734
    I'll admit I do not know what the filesize limit is - the service has iffy FAQs and support. I'd suggest compression of 8 and a resize if the form breaks.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)17:00 No.1539744
    >>1539743
    I think the max is about 15MB when I submitted.

    It tells you in the FAQ I believe too.
    >> Ham !t0vZq6Sbck 02/28/12(Tue)17:02 No.1539747
    >>1539734
    I uploaded two full 18mp file at 250ppi and it was fine. What the shit?
    >> nanonyous !!/1mJ8iKRQei 02/28/12(Tue)17:07 No.1539751
    >>1539744
    >>1539747
    My files were 11.xmb and 5.6mb respectively. The former was the one that kept 'breaking', and had a resolution of 5142x3427, so I don't know... I resaved it several times, once at 4k long just in case it was some kind of MP limit, but nothing worked until I simply saved it to 3k on long.

    Obviously, I guess, if other people submit without issues, there's nothing to worry about, it's just the Kalahari.net the little African is trying to use that's messing something up.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)17:08 No.1539753
    I would like to take part in this but I don't own a computer. I am currently on an iPad (it's not mine don't worry I'm not that much of a prick), so how would I take part? If I fill out all the parts in an email and sent it BJDrew can I enter this way?
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)17:09 No.1539754
    >>1539751
    It may be just your connection, dunno.

    Mine was about 6MB, 1800px on the longest at 300ppi, went through fine.
    >> Anonymous 02/28/12(Tue)17:09 No.1539756
    >>1539753
    Submit next time you have access to your computer.

    [Return] [Top]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]