Official press release was leaked by some Brazillian site, but they seem to have taken it all down now. Pictures still up on NR.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/06/nikon-d800-official-pictures-leaked.aspx/comment-page-1/#comments

EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	220 dpi
Vertical Resolution	220 dpi

It's a bit of the shame they ditched the red-triangle homage to the F and replaced it with a gay little stripe.

any word on price?

From 12mpx to 36mpx? Srsly Nikon? Y u do this?

>>1513517
About $3600 I think $300-500 more for the D800E

>brazilians

>>1513517
I resent the fact that the only upgrade path for D700 owners who want video is either £5000 or Canon.

Not that it really matters, but damn that's an ugly camera. The D3/D700 were pretty well proportioned, this just looks like its been squashed.

>>1513554
Yeah, it does look a lot like their entry levels...hopefully that's purely looks, and it still handles/feels as solid as the D700.

people apparently like the small size of nikons over the eos models. I myself find it difficult to hang on to a nikon but since getting my D40 I've gotten used to it. I still like the way the 7D fills my hand more tho.

>>1513598
>D40
>7D
You do realise they're two entirely different models? It's like saying Canon people like small cameras over Nikon's big ones. The 350D is okay, but the D3s fills my hands a lot better.

>>1513600
well I myself would try to hold something before buying it. I know there are slight differences in the sizes..

...but that's not how most consumers do business is it?

>>1513512
Pricing hinted at $3000/$3300 for the D800/E respectively.
(E is the model without the AA filter).
Cheaper than I was expecting, but it makes sense that it wouldn't be too much more expensive than the D700 currently is.

Also, why charge more for one without an AA filter? Is it simply because it's a niche product so they can charge more, or will they have to do extra things to it other than just removing it.

>>1513589
>>1513554
>>1513504

Not uglier than this.

>>1513634
Haha, the yellow one doesn't look that bad, for what it is.

>>1513690
Haha, get the fuck out.

>>1513690
>inb4 not viral marketing

>>1513705
Yeah it looks retarded, but it's not claiming to be anything professional is it. It's just a strange looking camera.

>>1513491
Annnd we have the press release albeit translated from Portuguese.
http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/06/nikon-d800-press-release.aspx/#more-32762

Some main points:
USB 3
4fps FX, 6 DX
Uncompressed HD signal directly off the camera for an HDMI output (8 bit, 4:2:2)
1080 and HD 720 30/24p to 60p. By using the method of data compression B-Frame, the user can record video in H.264 / MPEG-4 AVC (anyone give an insight into the difference between the two types?)
100% VF
Shutter rated at 200,000
CF+SD slots.

AF in the photo, as it didn't translate too well.

>>1513731
that sounds remarkably unremarkable

almost bad

>>1513731
No XQD card support? Not that anyone uses them right now, but I did expect it to be in this level of product.

>>1513734
XQD might not take off, considering the major card makers basically said they ain't gonna make them.

>>1513634

The Black one looks quite nice.

Inb4 'ur trolling faget' coming from all the butthurt traditionalists who cry when there isn't a pentaprism or strict adherence to ancient design principles.

>>1513734
I guess they're using that as a way to differentiate between the D800 and the D4.

>>1513731

H.264 is just a type of compression, it's like the JPEG of video.

The interesting part of the D800 is the ability to shoot in uncompressed video with 4:2:2 pulldown (which means the image is retaining a lot of information that would otherwise be destroyed in a compressed (H.264) format, basically a lighter video version of RAW)

It'll be interesting if the 5DX has this feature, if not then the D800 could take over the pro HDSLR market.

>>1513757
I don't think it can actually shoot in uncompressed, it just has the option to send it out via the HDMI. I think they had a similar thing with the D4, the clean output being one of the big things they were shouting about.

>>1513757
Also, is there much of a difference between H.264 and MPEG-4 AVC? I don't know much about either.

>>1513763

H.264/MPEG-4 AVC is one big long name, pretty much any modern device that records HD video uses it.

>>1513766
Oh okay. Cheers.

all of those fancy tech specs & multi-card slots and video performance don't mean shit.
how does it feel in yer hand?
do i gotta dig thru a menu?
can i X without going through Y & Z?
technology is cool and all.. but if its not easy and intuitive - its just a chunk of shit with a lot of megapickles.

>>1513779
Well, if you've actually used a DXXX/X Nikon before, you'd know exactly how they feel and handle. And they do it very well.
Sadly you wouldn't know as the only thing that's in your hands these days is a bottle of alcohol.

>>1513781
>hands - plural
>bottle - singular
you seem to have mistaken me for someone who isn't a 2 fisted drinker.
but thats besides the point.
yeah, i've tried the D7000 & D3.
and yeah.. they are real nice.
i own a D90 & still haven't found myself needing more of anything.
please explain why i absolutely NEED a D800.
i'm not a gearfag so unless its gonna do some magical shit like make my bed or start my coffee in the morning - its just another camera.

>>1513779
More importantly, what the fuck does the IQ say at high ISO?

>>1513788
>please explain why i absolutely NEED a D800.
No one said you do, and you don't.

>>1513788 please explain why i absolutely NEED a D800.
To invalidate a camera based on the fact it doesn't have features you personally needs is fucking retarded. You hardly need a D90, let alone a D800. Someone who wants full frame video, or a professional studio photographer on the other hand, will need all this crap. Christ, for someone older you'd think you have a bit more sense about you.
>>1513790
Probably gonna suffer. Although in theory the pixel pitch is lower than that on a D7k, so I imagine it will sit somewhere between the D7k and the D700 in terms of noise performance. Not great, but I guess if they released a mini D4 that would just eat into those sales, like the D700/5DII invariably did for their D3/1DsIII.

>>1513790
>what the fuck does the IQ say at high ISO?
makes no difference to me at all.
why would i be shooting at an extremely high ISO to begin with?
i have lights & i use them when needed.
i don't expect i'll ever be shooting by candlelight.
thats not what i'm into & i honestly have no need for it.
my next upgrade will probably be the D3 - not S or X - just D3.
that'll put me into the full frame arena with better than average ISO/IQ.
i'm not saying the D800 won't be a great camera.
i AM saying that i don't need one.
just like i don't need a ferrari to get to the office.

>>1513806
Are you aware that all your post amounts to is "I don't need one"?

>>1513808
yep.
and thats the whole point.
go on & gearfag about the many wonders of the D800.
if you don't need it - who gives a fuck?
i don't imagine anyone on /p/ actually NEEDS it - so why is there a thread about it every 2 days?
lets gearfag some more about shit we ain't never gonna buy.

In terms of video, the D4 has a 2.7 pixel matched crop mode which allows you to shoot 1080 with no pixel/line binning (I'm unfamiliar with video, so these are terms I'm probably using wrongly/not even correct terms).
Does that bring any benifit to the actually video quality? I think I read somewhere that moire is made worse by the line skipping that goes on when using the whole sensor, does that mean the D800 would need a ~3.8x crop to achieve this?


>>1513813
>so why is there a thread about it every 2 days?
Because it's being announced in the next few hours. Because it's a camera and this is a photography forum. Cameras facilitate photographs. Lots of people here have D700/5DIIs (so some of the Nikon people are likely to buy one).
Remember, it's only you who doesn't need it. Some of us actually leave our little offices and take photos of things other than alcohol.
You≠everyone else.
Thank God, otherwise /p/ would be filled with pity/drunk threads rather than gear/photo threads.

>>1513813
>Implying there aren't other merits to discussing future products.
I guess no one on /p/ owns shares in Nikon then, or is planning to buy a Nikon in the future.

Don't even start on the whole "no one needs it" shit,, sure people can get by with less but better gear makes their job easier and gets them better results. You'd realise this if you ever took photos of anything other than yourself.

http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/

Woop! It's up!

Only $3k for the D800.
$3.3 for D800E

Bah, no crop mode for video other than DX.

>>1513816
>it's only you who doesn't need it.
uh huh.. and yer a movie makin superstar with hollywood dreams... right?

>>1513816
>I guess no one on /p/ owns shares in Nikon then, or is planning to buy a Nikon in the future.
are you high?
most of /p/ is in high school and has no idea wtf a bear market is and couldn't make an option to save their ass.
and if they COULD - they still wouldn't know what to do about the D800 release.
contrary to popular belief, i'm not retarded.
i drink because i can - not because i have to.
theres a huge difference.
enjoy your spread.

>Mid April release.
FML

>>1513831
If you even read the press release/any of the early rumours, you'd know this isn't even for making videos.
Why are you even posting in this thread? You're just embarrassing yourself. More than usual.

>>1513831
>are you high?
Oh wow, that's rich coming from a drunkard.
>most of /p/ is in high school
I think you'll find that the majority is 20+, and that very few are under 18.
>and if they COULD - they still wouldn't know what to do about the D800 release.
Is this another case of you not knowing and so nobodies knows?
>contrary to popular belief, i'm not retarded.
I don't think you're retarded, easily above average when it comes to knowledge on /p/, but your an arsehole and an attention whore. I don't even say that to offend you, I honestly hope that one day after enough people have said it to you you'll realise how right they are and change.
>i drink because i can - not because i have to.
No, you have to. I can drink too, shit I've got like 20 bottles somewhere in my kitchen, but I don't drink on my own sitting at the computer and sticking photos of myself drinking on 4chan.
>enjoy your spread.
Better be chocolate.

The D800 sounds pretty damn sexy, as does the D4. But what I really want to know is when will the price of the D3's go down?

HAHAHA NIKON WINS AGAIN, GO BACK TO YOUR PRINTERS, CANON FAGGOTS

>>1513742
>The Black one looks quite nice.

>Inb4 'ur trolling faget' coming from all the butthurt traditionalists who cry when there isn't a pentaprism or strict adherence to ancient design principles.

Dude really? It's not even that. It's just ugly. Remember when this piece of shit came out? It's the Pontiac Aztec. A completely original design that I'm sure GM stockholders collectively shit themselves when they saw it.

The K-01 is ugly because it's a retro-design that doesn't look retro (well, at least the yellow one, the others look okay color-wise), and that the mode dial is completely out of place looking on the camera. It's like, they forgot to put it there, and then, instead of incorporating in logically, they were all like, "Let's take a design cue from 'Star Wars' and make a bulge where we could put it like the Mon Calamari fish people ships! That will appeal to people!"

I could care less about the whole flange-focal distance debacle, and it'd be a good looking camera with the mode re-integrated or removed.

>>1513834
at least a year post d4 release

>>1513832
>You're just embarrassing yourself.
really? by not being suckered into 'the next big thing'?
iphone.
google.
microsoft.
might as well stock up on beanie babies and furbys... cause you know that shits gonna sell for years to come.
if yer gonna buy, but physical shit.
not tech or futures that might be a hit.
look at a 12 month history & tell me i'm full of shit.
thats the difference between me & most of you guys.
i know what i'm doing with my money.
don't ever think that my love of booze interferes with my business logic.
i could sell everything and retire tomorrow if i wanted & not a single fuck would be given.
i have more than i need because i don't need more than i have.
ps: prediction- huge tech hit coming by late spring. you ready?

put my pre-order in last week.

Will post video of box opening.

On a related note, will be selling my D700 on gumtree

>>1513855
Still embarrassing yourself.

>>1513859
Are you the same Aussie Jeremo of old?
With pre-orders, how do you pay? Do you pay for the price it was when you order it, or the price when you pick it up?

>>1513848

>sad panda

>>1513860
>Still embarrassing yourself.
>can't dispute a 12 month record.
>attacks my drinking habit.
>thinks i'm full of shit.
>loses money.
>mfw

>>1513861
yeah dude, still me, I just don't bother with a tripcode anymore.

I basically got help from NPS (Nikon Professional Services) to secure me one. If you're elgibile, even for the light service I HIGHLY recommend becoming a member.

I haven't had to give money yet, and the retailer is someone who i purchased my two D700s from. The NPS part was to simply assure that I would get one from them. So i'm kinda helping my retailer out too... even if they are the grumpiest old men on the planet ahha.

I have it on good word that the D800 is everything it promises to be, that word came from a Nikon Ambassador who I met at PMA and stayed in touch with.

>>1513855
>>1513874
>Implying

>excited over a body

Whoopy? I guess

>Got out with new D800
>take 4 shots in RAW
>Card full message
>have to go home.
>fml

>>1513877
Ah, I'd qualify except for the part where you need to earn the majority of your income from photography. Did they give any info on what to expect noise wise?
>>1513880
14 bit uncompressed on this camera would be an absolute joke. Even just the jpgs are bloody ~30MB

>>1513880
76MB raw files says DP review. fml

>>1513885
nah, just FULL TIME photography, get abn, get website. Profit.

They are not that anal about fact checking.

Noise level is apparently on par with D3s, but because I didn't ask if that was native or scaled down from 36mp.

I just liking having the choice to step down a bit, I do a fair bit of print work now and the 36MP helps. But I more likely than not will be shooting most other things at a lower res

>>1513887
Damn, that's like just over 200 photos to a 16GB card.

>>1513892
Is spraying and praying something you like to do?

>>1513890
Most definitely scaled down.
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/img/sample01/img_02_l.jpg Here's a full sized at 640 ISO. Noisy as hell compared to what we're used to from Nikon's FF.
The UK NPS is a bit different to the Aussie one I think.

>>1513892
I'm hoping they chose the 14bit uncompressed for those numbers, for shock value.
>>1513896
Do you like to return to your computer every day?

>>1513885
>Even just the jpgs are bloody ~30MB
>>1513887
>76MB raw files

and you all NEED this for your occasional 8x10 that you get printed from Walgreens.

>>1513899

http://vimeo.com/36305675
here's a video shot with it

>>1513896
No, but it's not hard to take more than 200 photos in an outing. This shit isn't film, it costs nothing to take some extra shots. Of course that's not so much the case with this as you need more memory cards, but when I can fit 1000+ photos on my 8GB card I won't hesitate on taking some extras.

>>1513899
>I don't need it so you don't need it, and if you don't need it no one does.

Well fuck you, I don't need alcohol and neither do you, they should just go ahead and ban the shit as it's completely unwanted.

>>1513904
>completely unwanted.
i never said that.
want is very different from need.
i want heidi klum - but i don't need her to do what i need to do.
lrn2differentiate & prioritize in a cost effective manner.

>>1513892
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/features04.htm
I was right, the 76MB is just for the biggest.
Only about 35MB for a decent 14bit compressed

>>1513908
Fine then, alcohol is unneeded. Now stop grabbing at straws and changing the subject.

>>1513911
>changing the subject.
i haven't changed shit.
i said i can't into D800 & merely responded to each bullshit response with bulletproof logic.
i'm sure its going to be a wonderful camera - that very few people actually NEED.
its gearfag shit for bragging rights that most folks will never use to its fullest capacity.
it sounds fantastic.
really.
but how many people NEED fantastic?
most of /p/ has no need for this thing.
thats all i'm saying.
argue it up all you want.
maybe 2 people here actually NEED this.
and those 2 people have already been so far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like.
fuck you and your 4x6 prints from your shitty HP printer.
you don't need this.
period.

>>1513930
>Implying you NEED a D90.
>Implying you NEED a camera at all.
Protip. By your logic the only thing any of us should be getting is bread and water.
You're appearing more and more stupid as the thread progresses. Which is a feat in itself each time.

>>1513937

>Implying people who do photography for a living don't need cameras

>Implying photography can be a living, but only if you have full frame gear, and its not possible to make money if you have a crop sensor

P.S. Pic related

>>1513937
>Implying you NEED a D90.
uh.. yeah.. a D90 does what i need for now.
>Implying you NEED a camera at all.
uh.. yeah.. i can't take photos without a camera.

and you can stop with the upside down argument anytime.
bread and water?
great comparison.

>>1513950
You don't need to take photos.
You simply want to.
Sell your camera, please.

my want does not exceed my need.
i'll be keeping my D90.

>>1513964
D3100 says otherwise, brah.

So IQ-wise, D800E will wipe the floor with SD1, Foveon or not, for about half the price. Oh, and with more, better lenses.

WAT NOW SIGMA

So this is D700 with video, and triple the resolution.

NIKON! Y U NO FIX FOCUS POINTS

>>1513982
What's wrong with the focus points?
I read they have a 1.2 crop, with 1fps more which would utilise a lot more of the points over the frame.

>>1513984
>What's wrong with the focus points?
They're all clumped up in the middle 1/4 of the image, because Nikon is too lazy to make different AF modules for their crop and FF cameras.

>I read they have a 1.2 crop, with 1fps more which would utilise a lot more of the points over the frame.
Well yeah, but would I buy a $3k FF DSLR and use it in crop mode just so the focus point layout is more convenient?

>>1513990
Ah. I only ever use MF lenses, and on the rare occasion I shove an AF on my D700 I only ever use the middle few points.
The video in the D800 sounds kinda shitty in that for full 1080, it only uses 91% of the frame (width wise)

>>1513990

You wouldn't, but you would use a 1.2 crop for a lot faster writes and a bit more throw to the lens so you can use a fast zoom without it being the size of a bazooka.
I for one always liked the idea of Canons 1.3 crop more than FF for action shots, you can use the next size smaller and lighter of zoom and get a lot faster burst.
and inb4 the whole 'b-b-b-b-b-but better IQ" whining, i will remind you that its still impossible to compare the IQ of a shot you missed entirely, in this case due to slow burst speed or attempting to hump around and/or aim an extra 5 pounds of lens.

>>1513982

I see no problem with the focus points. I mean, I never really need focus points in areas where there are no focus points. Hell, I happy with an F4 and one focus point.

COMPOSE. AF-L. RECOMPOSE.

>>1513972

>WAT NOW SIGMA

Meanwhile at Sigma....

"I'm telling you! I needs to be EVEN MORE expensive with an EVEN MORE proprietary mount!!! That's why it isn't selling!!!!"
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Nick White
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2263
Image Height	1544
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2012:02:06 23:26:11
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	682

I can't be thankful enough to Nikon, they retail this for 3k only and the without the low-pass for only $300 more! I will definitely buy this when it will come out!

FUCK YOU, NIKON.
FUCKING UK PRICES.

>>1514039
You guys think 5D III will fit this price bracket aswell?

>>1514044
No idea. MkII was cheaper than the D700 when it was released here.

>>1514039
The Dutch have the regular version for EUR 2900 inc VAT. God, I want it.

>>1514049
FFS. We're getting fucking shafted.
Pretty much a directed $:€ price.

>>1514052
Not really, no. Used to be much worse a few years ago.
Substract the VAT (which you can claim back if you're VAT registered company, which you really should be if you're doing photography), add the Murkin sales tax, and it's all pretty much the same.

D700 original MSRP: $3000
D800 original MSRP: $3000

5D2 original MSRP: $2800
5D3 original MSRP: probably similar to the 5D2's unless the 5D3 is just as good as the D800 in which case they'll go $3000

Seriously, Canon is going to have either to bring their A-game or undercut Nikon. Nikon's going with good AF, high MP, and most likely good ISO performance. Canon got away with it last time because Nikon had a much lower MP body. I want to believe they won't pull another 60D but that's not guaranteed.

Nikon did have it's factories flooded twice, once by the tsunami, and once by the Thailand flooding shit.

I suppose I can't argue against $300 extra for removing an accessory.

>>1514060
In America you don't get charged sales tax if you buy from an out-of-state company.

Hehe, looks like they learned their lesson from the D700 (nobody wanting the D3).

>>1514097
Uhhh, how exactly?

D3 and D700: same AF, same software specs, same sensor, 5 fps vs 9 fps

D4 and D800: same AF, same software specs, 16mp vs 36mp, 4 fps vs 10 fps

If anything, those who don't need insane continuous shooting speed have even more incentive to get the lower model now.

>>1514106
>implying the biggest selling point of a camera is FPS.
I can't tell if you're a troll or just really, really stupid.
D700 was everything about the D3 minus the fps + better body, in a smaller body.
D800 in the vein of the D4 would be a 16MP high ISO god, in a small body.

>>1514108
And now, if we want absurdly high ISO, we have no where to go except a £5000 camera, or to the D3s. There isn't a single one in a reasonable sized body, at a reasonable price.

>>1514108
You do realize that the "more megapickles = OMG MORE NOISE" mentality is not entirely true? D3X had only marginally worse high ISO performance compared to D3 if downscaled to 12 MP; the same may be true for D800 vs D4.

with the prices being driven down on D3s and D700s now Nikon is going to be styling

>DAT GLASS

wtf is this, saw this shit on (http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2012/02/07/the-nikon-d800-less-than-meets-the-eye/) a blog and searched the webs for the original, uploaded 5 days ago (http://www.google.se/imgres?q=d800+sample+image&um=1&hl=sv&client=firefox-a&sa=N&am
p;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&biw=1245&bih=950&tbm=isch&tbnid=L7drWG30pAiMEM:&
;imgrefurl=http://www.lpmag.me/themes/2012/02/new-nikon-d800-sample-leaked/&docid=DHfXu1ErHSOWxM
&imgurl=http://d1ljua7nc4hnur.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/first-leaked-image-from-
D800.jpg&w=4912&h=7360&ei=av0wT7r5Bu2M4gTWiO2RBQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=643&
vpy=114&dur=4968&hovh=275&hovw=183&tx=74&ty=121&sig=107809137347436454324&am
p;page=1&tbnh=144&tbnw=96&start=0&ndsp=30&ved=1t:429,r:3,s:0)

Still taken with the d800?! If that so, wtf is that for quality!?

>>1514133
tl;df

also, let's wait for samples from reputable sources, shall we?

>>1514133
if thats the quality, bahahahahahahaha!

Great news. I'll sell my 5Dii and buy D800

D800-D300-F100 My life is now complete
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix X100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:01:07 10:43:52
Exposure Time	1/110 sec
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	888
Image Height	590
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>1514137

You gotta be shitting me the Japanese eat goddamn eyeballs??????!!!!!!

>>1514154
you ignorant spot, the fisheye is the most tasteful meat on the fish. now you don't eat the pupil or lens, only the meat.

>>1514160

You mean the meat around the eye? Or the aqueous humor?

>>1514160
That's a Horse eye you mad cunt wanker.
They use it as a binder in foods, and as a treat for children.

A long slit is made in the middle of th eye, and the delicious jelly eagerly sucked out by children.

The same Gelatin is also used as a binder, to keep the ground beef together in large burgers.

>>1514154
Have you ever tried it? It's actually quite delicious.

but you can't put it into pocket! fail!

>>1514186
>Full Frame
>Pocketable

Olympus MjuII, Olympus XA, Lomo LC-A, Nikon Lite Touch, etc.

>>1513902
Great video. Add in cast, crew, including 2 camera operators, steadicam, etc, cost of the D800 would have been a minuscule part of the budget but Nikon probably paid for it all. Still, looks like they've remembered the now burgeoning H-DSLR market they opened up with the D90. A serious contender for the 5D X. Will be very interesting to see what Canon come up with.

>>1514190
They shut down half of Chicago to make that too.
I was so relieved when I saw it and realised they hadn't completely screwed up like they normally do compared to Canon.
Then I came across this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2auo10nbPvQ
I'm Nikon through and through. But holy crap that shit they put out when trying to market makes me so embarrassed. Especially when they talk about 'beautiful bokeh' and crap like that. That video though. Rainbow vomit.