>>be japanese
That may be your dream, but I happen to like my big penis.

Glad for him but I don't go below 18yo (16 if in my homeland, where it's legal).

Ill go to as low as whats legal, off to spain i go im thinking.

who the fuck is he anyway?

>>1502537
Owner of that candydoll model site I think. Might be just the photographer.

Are they that into western lolis?

MOAR!

Not really. I don't like working with models all that much. My next project will involve food.

>forever a scone

>>1502545
They're far too saucy for /p/.

>whips
>latex
>provocative poses

On the technical side, they are really well photographed.

Because there's a shit load of people doing exactly that.

>>1502541
I think you mean eastern lolis, those are all Russian, Ukrainian, Serbian girls.

And plus, young white girls are much more attractive than the other races.

>>1502571
You're racist.

>>1502571
Well for Japan that's west.
Anyway am I the only one who see a slight hint of pedophily in this?

>>1502585
In what? You could use the same judgment for halloween costume photos uploaded to Facebook.

>>1502586
I don't know ehre you live but where I live I don't see 10yo lolis with thong, high heels, latex suite and whip posing in porn mode for halloween

>>1502588
It is acceptable in Japan I guess where the age of consent is 13. Why were you looking this up?

>>1502588
i lol'd

you'd be surprised

>>1502590
because I have eyes

>>1502595
Curious eyes.

>>1502585
Because you are a pedophile.

What's wrong? It's just a photo.

>>1502532
You beat me to it.

I do alright now, Ive just started working on feature films.

Good times.

>be on /b/
>find myself in a cp thread
>looking at naked children
>mentally critique the lighting, composition, poses of images in thread

/p/

(I think they were mostly from some eastern European photo agency called LS or BD - anyway, you know the ones I'm talking about)

>>1502696
Oh this one isn't that extreme.

I don't even have a DSR yet. :\

>>1503635
WHAT

>>1503655
I just have a normal camera at the moment. I've been unsure of what one to get. I don't want to regret my purchase.

>>1502696

LS models was shut down.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_Ukrainian_child_pornography_raids

>>1502696

>you know the ones I'm talking about

this is what pedos actually believe.

>>1502571
Taste is subjective.

So here's the question. You're an out of work photographer and an opportunity comes up to shoot for a child modelling agency. You will be doing it anonymously (so your friends and family need never know), and everything is above board (no nudity, everything legal). But here's the thing; you know the images will be published in books/online for the sole purpose of being purchased by pedos who get off on this shit. Do you accept the job? Is it even exploitation? You get paid, the models get paid, the parents are happy for them to do it, the models seem to enjoy being in front of the camera, nobody is hurt... so, where's the problem?

Hard Mode: soaking wet 2 piece bikini shoot.

>>1504484
meh, why not. I really don't care who gets off on it. People can get off to a photograph on anything. The actual job is no different from fashion photography. I'm not going to stop shooting wildlife just because I know there are people out there into bestiality.

>>1504486
This is how things work in Japan. Pictures of young girls are published in books/online for the sole purpose of being purchased by pedos. Talking about this social phenomenon doesn't make me one.

>>1504493

I'm not entirely sure what you're getting at. Maybe you missed the point of my post. I presented a 'what if' scenario because I was interested in how the anon of /p/ would react to it. I didn't offer my own personal opinion or take on that scenario.

I think kids are really interesting subjects to shoot and enjoy shooting portraits or candids of children of family/friends whenever I get the chance. But personally I would only shoot for such an agency if the money was really good. I would prefer not to contribute to the sexualization of children becoming more socially acceptable - which I think agencies such as those in Japan are doing.

Now, exploring the themes of sexuality and childhood in art is a different matter altogether. Sally Mann, for instance.

>>1504510
>Sally Mann, for instance.

LOL when actually I read she's very appreciated by a pedophile who wrote this article
http://mirror.wikileaks.info/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn/

>"This magazine was sold everywhere - sometimes from under the counter. Only in the 80s the magazine was discontinued due to new laws set. From the 90s, the notion of child pornography expanded ever further. In the 70s and 80s, nudist magazines such as "Young and Free," "Sunshine Friends", etc. were still perfectly legal to buy. Even artists such as David Hamilton, Jock Sturges and Sally Mann published images of naked children and adolescents, which was at the time was considered an art

>>1504519

>on /p/
>not knowing who Sally Mann is
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>1504528
I know who she is you retard

>>1504484
That's the dilemma. I mean it's no different from fapping over some girl's Facebook beach party photos.

Art =/= Sexual

>>1504493
So the millions that buy this stuff in Japan where its legal...what do you have to say about them? They're a functioning 1st world society just like good ol' USA.

>>1504519

I was reading that earlier and clearly the person who typed all that shit up is a pedophile trying to defend their guilts.

>>1504546
In many ways Japanese society is superior to America (of course vice versa as well). It's illegal to be fat (no seriously, you'll be fined or fired if you don't get under a certain BMI), the transit and rapid transit systems are some of the best in the world, and finally, if you work hard to get into a good university and do well, you're basically guaranteed a job. As opposed to the US where I see people with Masters' waiting tables and shit.

>>1504564
So you're saying 13 onwards buy this sorta stuff and no one one really gets all worked up about it?

>>1504484
If you accept such job, even letting aside moral issues and laws, you are deliberately encouraging pedophile's behaviours and even if in the studio everyone is happy outside if some piece of shit get overexcited and rape a child is partly your fault.
Sexualizing children, expecially before puberty, it's a very dangerous thing to do because you are encouraging sexual attention to them. A lot of sick losers will begin to go around for them once the association is done.

The work of LS models is particularly dangerous IMO, because it presents childrens in a way that is very appealable even to "normal" adults. One that normally finds CP repulsive might instead feel attracted by LS's style because the pre-pubescent girls resemble grown up pin ups. It's a very dangerous "image bending" game that can trigger and encourage predatory behaviours toward childrens

>>1504574

>Look at pictures of naked women
>Instantly feel the desire to rape women

>Be exposed to pictures of naked men
>Instantly change my sexual preferences and become homosexual

>>1504579
you seem to have understand shit.

now, take a look at this:
http://wakaba.ojab.ru/wakaba/src/PionaP15_007.jpg
and tell me how it feels

>>1504579
>Look at naked women
>Instantly have desire to have consensual sex with naked women

>Look at naked children
>Instantly...THEY'RE NAKED FUCKING CHILDREN.

How is this even an argument?
Oh wait, I'm on 4chan.

>>1504579

Dude that's awesome. Remember that show The Pretender? Didn't air for very long as I recall, but you are like that. But like sexed. Sweet.

>>1504586

I didn't 'feel' anything. But what I see is a nubile teenager.

OK i think you've well and truly established that you would never accept a job at one of those child modelling agencies. You seem to be on a morality crusade against what is nothing more than a hypothetical scenario.

>>1504609
>hypothetical scenario

well, no Herman. Read the link about the LS models crackdown, or the one of written by the pedo no wikileaks. It's not hypotetical, the scenario described was just what happened at LS agency with "professional" photographers and all.

>morality crusade
I'm very far from being a moralfag. Even if I picked on Sally Mann, I don't consider her work as "pedophile" in its nature. But explicit and mere sexualization of children (the girl in the pic was 12 at the time) without any other "higher" aim than mere profit (so essentially pornography, even if in a soft form) it's something terrible.
From my point of view children that have hit puberty obviously have a sexuality and they shuold have the possibility to explore it with any traumatic experience and especially with no abuse.

The thing that is wrong with children, and with everyone should take these topics with pliers and very carefully, is mainly their legal status: let's face it, even if we tell us they are protected by the law (maybe the criminal ones) they are actually 2nd class citizens in most of the countries.
They have no economic power and legal status to defend their will by legal means, and if the abuse happens to be perpetrated by their own parents they can't do pretty much anything. They can only wait to become legally adult, and then? Their life is pretty ruined already.

>>1504586
>implying I'm gonna click that link

Nice try.

>>1504586
that is one NICE ass
>>1504643
yeah man the FBI is already waiting in front of you house, don't click it!!!

it's nothing sinister.
It's reachable thru google with safesearch on medium

>>1504586
Fat roll where the latex boot ends, wouldn't bang.

C&C thread? Yes, it's C&C thread!
EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2012:01:30 06:27:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	538
Image Height	900

>>1504878
Too old, wouldn't fuck.

Once I was on /b/ and saw a thread with "not CP, just professional girls doing serious modeling"

i said that it was CP, saged and reported it, and I got banned for posting on a CP thread...

>>1504510
What if we already do this for free.

>>1504574
What if the causality runs the opposite way? Rapes are way down post widespread access to the internet (and tons of free porn) became normal.

>>1504881
People are pedoparanoiacs, they see CP in everything.
Sad, I haven't seen models under 13-14 years at the festival. Nymphets coated in indecent costumes were everywhere, just like in a dream. Picrelated is 16yo. Not too old, not too yong.