| >> |
12/14/11(Wed)21:48 No.1460498
File1323917297.jpg-(38 KB, 442x389, 27.jpg)
 >>1460466
>they are not good photos
Why
not? Tell me why they suck. I come to /p/ to learn, I'm fine listening
to harsh critique. If I wanted to hear that my photos are the best
photos I would send them to my mom(which I do sometimes, she loves my
photos :3 )
>You should really work on learning composition
Can
you give me an example, I put some thought into some of these shots.
Your argument is pretty much like /ic/ saying "learn about human
anatomy" without properly addressing the part that fails to meet the
requirement.
Making a good interesting photo of a dull and
mundane subject such as your neighborhood is difficult. I've tried and
explored other parts of Tucson, but I'm interested in capturing my
neighborhood in a good photo, and be able to show the world what it
looks and feels like; any advice in successfully doing so is welcome.
Also,
you say that there are better subjects in Tucson, but a good
photographer should be able to make a good photograph of a simple and
boring object, and turn it into something worth looking at. I've seen
/p/ rage and bitch about that Russian girl from the Digitalrev's
contest, 'cos her photos are good only for the fact that she used good
equipment and had access to models and shit ton of other stuff, and even
other peeps rage at "The Michael Bay of photography" on the argument
that his work would suck if he used only the basic bare camera
equipment, and didn't have access to all those fancy things and didn't
rely so much on photoshopping the hell out of everything; yet people
bitch about /p/eeps that post photos of subjects that lack
'interestingness', and that implies that the subject alone makes the
photo.
I'm looking for advice on taking a good photo of where I
live. It's hard for me to tell what is interesting about this place.
Even tough everything looks boring to me because I see it everyday, I
try to capture what I think represent a tiny part of this place. |
