Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • hi friends, let's chat!

    edit: THANKS FOR THE CHAT BROS <3

    File : 1317079430.jpg-(1.1 MB, 670x1000, RevJJ_1k1k.jpg)
    1.1 MB Cropfest Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:23 No.1401431  
    Ok, this is the first time I've asked for C&C, so be as cruel as you like. Jesse Jackson came to Ohio University to tell the people of Appalachia that they are still poor (I happen to agree with his stance on preventing poverty but that's another story). Anyway, unkind people decided to watch him too, so I'm having to crop. Recommendations/advice?
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:27 No.1401434
         File1317079631.jpg-(1.36 MB, 1000x863, RevJesseJackson_crop1k.jpg)
    1.36 MB
    Thanks!

    By the way, the missing exif is 50mm (a Nikon 1.4) and f/4.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:32 No.1401441
    well, i doubt you'll be printing these, so just be brutal about it and crop as far as you can whilst still keeping the image above 600 or 800 pixels for your web use.

    here's some advice the next time this happens: good photojournalists are total assholes. push your way to the front, stand tall in front of every one, take time to frame and set your exposure and dof and wait for a good capture. Jesse Jackson won't care; celebrities and the like NEED good photographers to put good images of them out there. yes, everyone else is going to pissed at you and will be thinking of rude things to say to you that they won't actually utter. but fuck em, they're just jealous.

    tl;dr - you won't be very successful or consistent with your photography if you're being shy and timid.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:36 No.1401449
    >>1401441
    Good point. Any further forward, though, and I'd have been standing in front of a bank of pro video cameras. A 50mm did not cut it.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:38 No.1401454
    >>1401449
    Now you know some of the limits of a 50mm.

    And yeah, sometimes, you have to be "that guy." "That guy" is getting his shots in.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:40 No.1401458
    >>1401454
    I saw an expensive mix of primes and zooms there today. Tell me, is an 85mm worthwhile, and would it have any uses outside portraiture?
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:50 No.1401466
    Here is what '"that guy" produced.

    http://www.chron.com/news/article/Jesse-Jackson-urges-a-new-federal-war-on-poverty-2189332.php#photo
    -1627190
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:56 No.1401467
    >>1401458
    I hate rediculous questions like this. you can use 85mm for landscape, abstract, photojournalism, nature/wildlife, sports, aerial, ....even kite photography, it doesn't matter. my favorite lens is a 100mm macro that has IS. people are always asking me, "can you take portraits with that?" (while I am doing just that)

    well, why the hell not? since this was outdoors, I think a 70-200 or something like that would have been ideal.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:58 No.1401469
    >>1401458
    >is an 85mm worthwhile, and would it have any uses outside portraiture?
    every lens has a use outside that which people generally use it for. Haters might hate, but you might get some unique shots too. If i were there I'd probably be using an uber-telephoto to take tight headshot portraits of everyone... just for the lolz.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:03 No.1401474
    >>1401466
    decent stuff from "that guy," cut off his arm in that one frame, but the expressions of jackson and the man behind him are good. the shots of the crowd are kind of snapshottish, tho I like the one with jackson oof at the edge of the frame. did you take any other shots of the scene, or just portraits of jackson?
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:26 No.1401494
    Well I have half a dozen photos of Jackson lookin grump and President McDavis clenching his buttocks. Let me see....
    >> juanCARLOS !!cKt8bKm1c6H 09/26/11(Mon)20:27 No.1401496
    >>1401469

    >every lens has a use outside that which people generally use it for

    Not the canon 65mm MP-E. It's really only possible to use it for macro.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:28 No.1401499
         File1317083307.jpg-(463 KB, 1000x669, JJ1_crop.jpg)
    463 KB
    Here:
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:29 No.1401502
         File1317083393.jpg-(3.01 MB, 1398x1398, RevJesseJackson_crop3.jpg)
    3.01 MB
    >>1401441
    Took your advice:
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:40 No.1401512
         File1317084057.jpg-(1.14 MB, 670x1000, DSC_2106_scaled.jpg)
    1.14 MB
    That'll do.

    Thanks for the advice. A longer lens would be nice. At the moment, though, I am not sure which is more limiting, my D40x body or my lens, so I'm being cautious.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:41 No.1401514
    >>1401496
    alright. you got me there. that macro lens, fisheye lenses, and imo (mr. eglington) mirror lenses have definite areas of usage that necessarily exclude doing other types of photography with them... doing architecture with a fisheye, or close-ups with a mirror lens, for example, might make a novel photograph, but by and large, those are not the best lenses for those applications.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)21:05 No.1401528
         File1317085505.jpg-(203 KB, 670x691, 1317084057856.jpg)
    203 KB
    >>1401512
    fixed the head room

    that brick wall section above their heads does nothing for the photograph.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)21:08 No.1401531
    >>1401528
    Thanks. I seem to keep putting the faces right in the middle of the frame and it does me no good.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)21:49 No.1401566
    Ok, I've got to ask.

    WHY did you photoshop the same face on every person in these shots?
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)21:58 No.1401576
    >>1401566
    >OP posts different cropped versions of an original
    >"WHY did you photoshop the same face on every person in these shots?"

    ahahaha at the retards posting tonight. you the one arguing about dof in the other thread?
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)22:06 No.1401585
         File1317089204.jpg-(105 KB, 1000x714, DSC_7666p.jpg)
    105 KB
    >>1401458
    A friend just got one, and was using it mostly for landscape this morning (I brought a 50 and 180mm). I think they're decent (but not great) with a macro tube.

    In general, good crops. The biggest thing I've had to learn after the basics is, "be patient." Wait for the image that you want before releasing the shutter (film is a good way to practice this).

    Not very related, but I finally got a photo of the new MLK memorial where he didn't look so angry.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]