Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • hi friends, let's chat!

    edit: THANKS FOR THE CHAT BROS <3

    File : 1316686152.jpg-(40 KB, 339x512, 00035013a-512px.jpg)
    40 KB new workflow, same old snapshits !!Me2iIexFVez 09/22/11(Thu)06:09 No.1398331  

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:10 No.1398332
         File1316686202.jpg-(54 KB, 339x512, 00035016a-512px.jpg)
    54 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:10 No.1398333
         File1316686234.jpg-(87 KB, 339x512, 00035025a-512px.jpg)
    87 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:11 No.1398334
         File1316686264.jpg-(60 KB, 339x512, 00035027a-512px.jpg)
    60 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:11 No.1398335
         File1316686294.jpg-(44 KB, 339x512, 00035035a-512px.jpg)
    44 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:12 No.1398336
         File1316686358.jpg-(52 KB, 339x512, 00035039a-512px.jpg)
    52 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:13 No.1398337
         File1316686393.jpg-(45 KB, 339x512, 00035067a-512px.jpg)
    45 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:13 No.1398338
         File1316686423.jpg-(56 KB, 339x512, 00035088a-512px.jpg)
    56 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:14 No.1398339
         File1316686454.jpg-(74 KB, 339x512, 00035093a-512px.jpg)
    74 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:14 No.1398340
         File1316686494.jpg-(57 KB, 339x512, 00035102a-512px.jpg)
    57 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:15 No.1398341
         File1316686533.jpg-(43 KB, 339x512, 00035157a-512px.jpg)
    43 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:16 No.1398342
         File1316686578.jpg-(65 KB, 339x512, 00035163a-512px.jpg)
    65 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:16 No.1398343
         File1316686612.jpg-(45 KB, 339x512, 00035167a-512px.jpg)
    45 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:17 No.1398345
         File1316686653.jpg-(44 KB, 339x512, 00035174a-512px.jpg)
    44 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:18 No.1398346
         File1316686688.jpg-(69 KB, 339x512, 00035175a-512px.jpg)
    69 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:18 No.1398348
         File1316686729.jpg-(41 KB, 339x512, 00035186a-512px.jpg)
    41 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:19 No.1398351
         File1316686773.jpg-(50 KB, 339x512, 00035191a-512px.jpg)
    50 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:20 No.1398352
         File1316686806.jpg-(74 KB, 339x512, 00035196a-512px.jpg)
    74 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)06:20 No.1398353
         File1316686849.jpg-(116 KB, 339x511, 00035127a1-512px.jpg)
    116 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)11:51 No.1398438
    I don't understand how you can continue to be happy shooting such a soft and low contrast lens like that 600mm. Your subjects suffer for it.

    I mean
    >>1398338
    >>1398341
    >>1398351
    should have had lots of punch and vibrance, not to mention sharpness, but they don't. Nothing ever does.

    In a while you will look back on this period of your photography with regret for opportunities lost, and wish you had thrown that lens in the bin, where it belongs.

    Also you still can't seem to obtain proper exposure most of the time.
    >> Anonymous 09/22/11(Thu)11:58 No.1398440
    >that bokeh

    Excuse me while I go throw up
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:34 No.1398948
         File1316763296.jpg-(51 KB, 339x512, 00035215a-512px.jpg)
    51 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:35 No.1398949
         File1316763342.jpg-(65 KB, 339x512, 00035222a-512px.jpg)
    65 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:36 No.1398950
         File1316763373.jpg-(34 KB, 339x512, 00035244a-512px.jpg)
    34 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:36 No.1398951
         File1316763403.jpg-(47 KB, 339x512, 00035260a-512px.jpg)
    47 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:38 No.1398952
         File1316763489.jpg-(97 KB, 339x512, 00035263a-512px.jpg)
    97 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:38 No.1398953
         File1316763528.jpg-(55 KB, 339x512, 00035282a-512px.jpg)
    55 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:39 No.1398955
         File1316763590.jpg-(80 KB, 339x512, 00035285a-512px.jpg)
    80 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:40 No.1398956
         File1316763629.jpg-(45 KB, 339x512, 00035286a-512px.jpg)
    45 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:41 No.1398957
         File1316763683.jpg-(79 KB, 339x512, 00035298a-512px.jpg)
    79 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:42 No.1398958
         File1316763727.jpg-(112 KB, 339x512, 00035307a-512px.jpg)
    112 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:42 No.1398959
         File1316763766.jpg-(78 KB, 339x512, 00035309a-512px.jpg)
    78 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:43 No.1398961
    Why do you hate focus so much?
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:48 No.1398967
         File1316764138.jpg-(61 KB, 339x512, 00035310a-512px.jpg)
    61 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:49 No.1398969
         File1316764178.jpg-(66 KB, 339x512, 00035312a-512px.jpg)
    66 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:50 No.1398970
         File1316764220.jpg-(67 KB, 339x512, 00035317a-512px.jpg)
    67 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:50 No.1398971
         File1316764252.jpg-(61 KB, 339x512, 00035324a-512px.jpg)
    61 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:51 No.1398972
         File1316764294.jpg-(95 KB, 339x512, 00035327a-512px.jpg)
    95 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:52 No.1398973
         File1316764328.jpg-(76 KB, 339x512, 00035329a-512px.jpg)
    76 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:52 No.1398974
         File1316764358.jpg-(40 KB, 339x512, 00035330a-512px.jpg)
    40 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:53 No.1398975
         File1316764410.jpg-(66 KB, 339x512, 00035336a-512px.jpg)
    66 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:54 No.1398976
         File1316764449.jpg-(38 KB, 339x512, 00035378a-512px.jpg)
    38 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:54 No.1398977
         File1316764488.jpg-(64 KB, 339x512, 00035389a-512px.jpg)
    64 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)03:57 No.1398980
         File1316764629.jpg-(54 KB, 339x512, 00035368a-512px.jpg)
    54 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)07:17 No.1399058
    Mirror lens guy, why are you so bad at photography? And why do you continue to use such shitty lenses?
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)11:01 No.1399130
    >>1399058
    well, he's enjoying himself and having fun with photography.
    OP is obviously very antisocial, he doesn't really ever talk in these threads - and obviously, he's out shooting 900mm - he's probably scared to get close to people.
    >> sage 09/23/11(Fri)11:03 No.1399132
    >>1399130
    >OP is obviously very antisocial, he doesn't really ever talk in these threads

    you're new here, aren't you?
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)11:17 No.1399138
    >>1399132
    .... what makes you think that
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)11:42 No.1399153
    >>1398438
    >the subjects suffer
    >subjects
    what subjects? these are like random accidental misfires with a super telephoto.

    As for OP, you may be enjoying it, but there's no appreciable aesthetic value in these photos for anyone else. Either conform to something that others might be able to appreciate, find a forum where people might appreciate you (like a stalker/voyeurism forum), or just stop.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)11:53 No.1399164
    mr eglington, it seems that all of /p/ is in agreement.

    lose the donut lens.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)15:32 No.1399296
    >>1398973
    A small amount of skill emerging.

    Out of curiosity, does anyone know which mirror lens op is using? Is this like some Rokinon shit, or is this a Tamron or something?
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)16:18 No.1399330
    >>1399296
    pentax 1000 and sigma 600 I think
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)18:05 No.1399384
    OP, borrow a DA*300 off someone one day and do some telephoto shooting. Using a great lens like that might help you understand what a waste of fucking time it is shooting with those catadioptrics you seem to love so much.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)18:10 No.1399386
    >>1399153

    lol
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)18:10 No.1399387
    >>1399384

    OP may be a faggot but catadioptrics are still shit.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:22 No.1399532
         File1316834552.jpg-(65 KB, 339x512, 00035397a-512px.jpg)
    65 KB
    I don't reply because I post, leave, and forget.
    Nothing that's been said is even worth a response.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:24 No.1399537
         File1316834682.jpg-(62 KB, 339x512, 00035408a-512px.jpg)
    62 KB
    All of these are shot with a "Sigma 600mm f8 mirror" that's probably older than most of you.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:25 No.1399540
         File1316834732.jpg-(44 KB, 339x512, 00035411a-512px.jpg)
    44 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:27 No.1399541
    >>1399537

    My dad is older than me too, but I still take better pictures. Nobody gives a shit how old that POS lens is.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:27 No.1399542
         File1316834879.jpg-(55 KB, 339x512, 00035413a-512px.jpg)
    55 KB
    Why do I still use this shit lens?
    I simply could not take most of the photos I take with this lens with any single other lens.
    I love it. I don't need a reason.
    Pretend I'm a lomographer and just deal with it.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:29 No.1399543
         File1316834964.jpg-(48 KB, 339x512, 00035419a-512px.jpg)
    48 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:34 No.1399545
         File1316835252.jpg-(53 KB, 339x512, 00035422a-512px.jpg)
    53 KB
    These are not an improvement in skill.
    These are a compromise of principles; I am shooting raw for additional color depth, and processing all shots a bit, in a fairly consistent way. This is different to before when I was just shooting jpg and doing no edits, or occasional simple curve editing.
    Aslo I have almost settled on -2EF and a slightly modified 'bright' in-camera filter.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:35 No.1399547
         File1316835302.jpg-(105 KB, 339x512, 00035428a-512px.jpg)
    105 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:38 No.1399550
         File1316835492.jpg-(44 KB, 339x512, 00035441a-512px.jpg)
    44 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:39 No.1399552
         File1316835543.jpg-(62 KB, 339x512, 00035458a-512px.jpg)
    62 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:39 No.1399553
         File1316835599.jpg-(63 KB, 339x512, 00035485a-512px.jpg)
    63 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/23/11(Fri)23:40 No.1399554
         File1316835637.jpg-(49 KB, 339x512, 00035497a-512px.jpg)
    49 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)10:08 No.1399743
    >>1399532
    Then what's the point you stupid shit?

    There's not one person on this board that has ever asked for more, and if you come here, post and forget, why do you do it?

    Even if you wasn't using these shitty excuses for lenses, you'd still be a fucking terrible photographer.

    >>1398333
    >>1398337
    >>1398345
    >>1398352
    >>1398956
    >>1398970
    >>1399537
    >>1399543
    >>1399554
    Do you even put any thought into the pictures you take?

    You're not educating, you're not inspiring, you're not entertaining, you're not even looking for advice on how to get better. All you're doing is wasting people's bandwidth and time.

    Please never come back here.
    >> tiennec special Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)19:53 No.1399997
    >>1399743
    Aww muffin.
    You get so upset over something you could just ignore.
    Some of us do enjoy this stuff. In fact any photo thread is better than your bitter little hater posts. You seem to be the same person doing it to OP every time too right?
    How about next time you just hijack OPs thread by posting a link to your so much more awesome photos instead of speaking so much shit?
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)19:57 No.1400000
    >post stamp sized images
    What's the matter, too blurry to show at a higher resolution?
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)20:03 No.1400006
    Just me or are some of these slightly underexposed?
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)20:32 No.1400026
    these might be shit but at least it's not gear. and it's not like the guy is fagging up the whole board; it's just one thread.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:41 No.1400095
         File1316922103.jpg-(78 KB, 339x512, 00035607a-512px.jpg)
    78 KB
    >>1400000
    >too blurry
    That is often one of the numerous reason i make them 512px, yes.
    >>1400006
    >underexposed
    Yes. -2EF.
    Correct exposure on this lens is somewhat difficult. Plus you have to be really fast to aim focus and fire a few frames to even get a shot at all, so exposure tends to be the thing that suffers, then comes camera shake blur, and missed-focus.
    Exposing to the left is useful for maintaining artificially high shutterspeed, and useful to counter atmospheric haze, and this kind of optics, both of which cause the loss of some contrast.
    I'm also processing them with a bit more black than white glare.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:43 No.1400097
         File1316922200.jpg-(61 KB, 339x512, 00035511a-512px.jpg)
    61 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:44 No.1400098
         File1316922245.jpg-(73 KB, 339x512, 00035516a-512px.jpg)
    73 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:47 No.1400100
         File1316922437.jpg-(75 KB, 339x512, 00035524a-512px.jpg)
    75 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:48 No.1400101
         File1316922482.jpg-(76 KB, 339x512, 00035529a-512px.jpg)
    76 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:48 No.1400102
         File1316922523.jpg-(41 KB, 339x512, 00035531a-512px.jpg)
    41 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:49 No.1400105
         File1316922571.jpg-(43 KB, 339x512, 00035540a-512px.jpg)
    43 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:51 No.1400107
         File1316922668.jpg-(70 KB, 339x512, 00035542a-512px.jpg)
    70 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:51 No.1400108
         File1316922711.jpg-(48 KB, 339x512, 00035547a-512px.jpg)
    48 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:52 No.1400109
         File1316922752.jpg-(41 KB, 339x512, 00035548a-512px.jpg)
    41 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:53 No.1400112
         File1316922810.jpg-(70 KB, 339x512, 00035549a-512px.jpg)
    70 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:54 No.1400114
         File1316922855.jpg-(95 KB, 339x512, 00035555a-512px.jpg)
    95 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:55 No.1400116
         File1316922911.jpg-(79 KB, 339x512, 00035587a-512px.jpg)
    79 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:56 No.1400117
         File1316922974.jpg-(78 KB, 339x512, 00035603a-512px.jpg)
    78 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/24/11(Sat)23:56 No.1400118
         File1316923014.jpg-(33 KB, 339x512, 00035506a-512px.jpg)
    33 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)00:02 No.1400120
         File1316923371.jpg-(58 KB, 339x512, 00035500a-512px.jpg)
    58 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)00:36 No.1400138
    >>1399997
    >You seem to be the same person doing it to OP every time
    LOL. You think only one person on /p/ thinks this is horrible? You must have a poor opinion of most of /p/.

    Give me HDR, lomogaphy, yall, an invasion from another board, even spambots - anything is preferable to this fuzzy, bad and pointless stuff.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)00:41 No.1400142
    i think everyone is in agreement regarding these photos so lets just move on.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)00:53 No.1400148
    Usually I'd say that any photo thread is better than a gear thread, but goddamn seeing these photos is making me think twice. Nice one OP, I haven't seen photos this shit in a long long time.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)01:30 No.1400167
    but this is the only lens mr. eglington has! what will he shoot with if he puts up the 600mm?
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)01:39 No.1400172
    >Convert to black and white
    >Images saved

    As much as I hate to admit it, these images do make you recognizable, which instantly means you have a style, unlike 85% of /p/.

    Well played, Pentax wielding hall of mirrors man
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)01:51 No.1400180
         File1316929882.jpg-(180 KB, 339x512, Sigma600mmf8&Pentax1000mmf(...).jpg)
    180 KB
    >>1400167
    >what will he shoot with if he puts up the 600mm?
    Just to exacerbate the haters ulcers:
    Probably the 1000mm... but sadface: no 2m 1:3 macro then.
    ...or the 50mm 1:1.2 WIDE OPEN IN FULL RETARD MODE ... MUHFUGGAS!
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)01:59 No.1400186
         File1316930368.jpg-(72 KB, 339x512, 00035522a-512px.jpg)
    72 KB
    >>1400172
    >you have a style, unlike 85% of /p/.
    /me tips his vertically framed, not quite in the tiny DOF, low-contrast hat in your general direction.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)03:07 No.1400214
    >>1400180
    >Just to exacerbate the haters ulcers
    look, if somebody came in here on a regular basis and posted 40 or 50 pictures taken with a fisheye lens, we'd rip him a new one every time too. a mirror lens has a use and a purpose, but, IT'S NOT FOR STREET PHOTOGRAPHY!

    and for the love of god, every picture, with the same lens, at the same focal length? nobody does that. it's tiring on the eye. eglington has failed in a lot of places here. and I'm gonna say all these same things again next time he does a "50+ pictures of unrelated crap with my mirror lens" thread
    >> faggot haters Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)04:23 No.1400230
    >>1400214
    >mirror lens has a use and a purpose, but, IT'S NOT FOR STREET PHOTOGRAPHY!
    Says you.
    Besides, where does OP say this is street photography?
    Sounds like you have such a tight little knot in your gut about categorization that I seriously doubt you can just enjoy photography any more. If you are old you might consider seeing a doctor. If you are young; oh just shut the fuck up you pseudo-educated punk.
    >every picture, with the same lens, at the same focal length? nobody does that.
    There you go again, isn't that little box you live in getting a bit tight? Afaik OP is not posting these as a pretty presentation, or a portfolio, or what so many of you faggots seem to need before it's valid photography - a narrative... He is just shooting and posting. You probably also haven't noticed that this is the same person posting in the same thread for the last three shooting expeditions he has been on over the last three days.
    00035522-00035013=327 shots... over 3 days... most of /p/ could benefit from doing this as regularly as he seems to. Instead of gearfagging and bitching about other peoples photos.
    How about you get over your seriously anal opinion and post some of your own amazing photos already? Or have an internet argument 'ac' style: go actually GET a beatup $200 600mm mirror, and walk a mile in someone elses shoes to prove how much OP sucks, and see how fucking awesome you are then?
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)04:34 No.1400234
    >>1400230

    Sup OP.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)04:38 No.1400235
    >>1400230
    Hey OP, how's that samefagging working out for you?

    >>1400172
    >As much as I hate to admit it, these images do make you recognizable
    Only because most people don't go around taking snap shits with a 600/1000mm lens.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)04:46 No.1400238
         File1316940375.png-(11 KB, 446x361, 1306508127613.png)
    11 KB
    >>1400230
    >implying you're not OP
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)07:02 No.1400274
    >>1400230
    Haters:
    not told [ ]
    told [X]

    inb4 samefag.
    oh wait..........
    >> The Dude - forgot the trip on the other pc 09/25/11(Sun)08:07 No.1400286
    I think it's really cool that you use such a niche and overlooked setup. It obviously works for you and I can't wait to see more.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)09:08 No.1400302
         File1316956094.jpg-(41 KB, 500x426, $(KGrHqJ,!lwE5Zev(JjhBOe4i(...).jpg)
    41 KB
    >>1400286
    Thanks. http://oh-hi.info
    BTW, I was just on ebay & saw this: they wont ship it to me, but this looks like a nice specimen, heavy, but immune to internal dust, good length:aperture ratio, and almost indestructible by design. Just sayin.
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/230676574158?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)09:24 No.1400311
    The more photos OP took, the better he got at it (e.g. using the right subjects for this kind of lens without seeming like a papparazzi).
    I don't understand all the
    >hurr durr lose the lens hurr you suck duurrr
    He bought a 600mm to learn using it, and this is his progress. Better than lurking on /p/ all day and gearfagging the shit out of this board.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:55 No.1400735
         File1317002144.jpg-(64 KB, 339x512, 00035693a-512px.jpg)
    64 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:56 No.1400738
         File1317002186.jpg-(80 KB, 339x512, 00035676a-512px.jpg)
    80 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:57 No.1400740
         File1317002222.jpg-(73 KB, 339x512, 00035667a-512px.jpg)
    73 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:57 No.1400741
         File1317002269.jpg-(54 KB, 339x512, 00035635a-512px.jpg)
    54 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:58 No.1400743
         File1317002312.jpg-(66 KB, 339x512, 00035628a-512px.jpg)
    66 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:59 No.1400744
         File1317002352.jpg-(64 KB, 339x512, 00035627a-512px.jpg)
    64 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)21:59 No.1400746
         File1317002386.jpg-(37 KB, 339x512, 00035624a-512px.jpg)
    37 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)22:00 No.1400748
         File1317002436.jpg-(69 KB, 339x512, 00035620a-512px.jpg)
    69 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)22:01 No.1400750
         File1317002494.jpg-(51 KB, 339x512, 00035612a-512px.jpg)
    51 KB

    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/25/11(Sun)22:22 No.1400763
    >>1400311
    >got better at it
    >lens is still soft as fuck and OP doesn't know how to properly expose anything
    >> juanCARLOS !!cKt8bKm1c6H 09/25/11(Sun)22:27 No.1400765
         File1317004034.png-(104 KB, 245x245, DoubleDeeTrollface.png)
    104 KB
    >>1400750

    Looks like your blacks are a little dark
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)02:34 No.1400890
         File1317018879.jpg-(99 KB, 398x490, clockwork-spam.jpg)
    99 KB
    OP, just shoot with a box brownie. Any shots out of that would be sharper than anything you've done in this thread.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)03:39 No.1400917
         File1317022764.jpg-(198 KB, 512x339, IMGP5569-512px.jpg)
    198 KB
    >>1400890
    No.
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)15:47 No.1401275
    >>1400148
    Lol
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)19:26 No.1401433
    >>1398331
    I don't need to look any farther than this first image to know that you are a true artist. it conveys so much, with so little, it's amazing.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)20:09 No.1401479
         File1317082152.jpg-(534 KB, 800x533, IMG_9944cropped.jpg)
    534 KB
    'sup guys I heard we were posting snapshits in this thread
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)21:39 No.1401558
    Do you have your monitor turned up to The Light of a Thousand Suns?? cause these images are all a full stop underexposed.

    We won't even talk about the out-of-focus, poorly composition, and unimaginative subject, that's a given on /p/.

    But really, figure out where your monitor is at, cause its definitely lying to you right now.
    >> Anonymous 09/26/11(Mon)21:53 No.1401570
    >>1401558
    I'm sure OP just doesn't know how to meter for shit. I can't imagine any monitor lying THAT MUCH to you.

    Hell, you can even see the results on the camera's lcd screen right after each shot.
    >> Anonymous 09/27/11(Tue)03:14 No.1401817
         File1317107660.jpg-(110 KB, 503x667, faggots.jpg)
    110 KB
    >> Anonymous 09/27/11(Tue)03:22 No.1401821
    >>1401570
    Better than that, one can see a
    H-I-S-T-O-G-R-A-M
    on the rear LCD.
    >> Anonymous 09/27/11(Tue)05:35 No.1401855
         File1317116104.jpg-(69 KB, 339x512, 00035639a-512px.jpg)
    69 KB
    >>1401570
    Actually now that I am shooting raw and -2EF is my baseline with this lens, I can't see shit in preview any more. Not even in the shade.
    >>1401821
    I've never actually used the histogram in the field, I don't understand it well enough, and for some reason -2ef raw seems to display as very dark, so the histo is almost flat a lot of the time. Despite looking pretty good when I import them to pc.
    I've also just started editing my photos. Never did that before. Ever. So I'm probably overcompensating on the black because its usually white glare thats the signature of this lens.
    It's partly a necessity of artificially inflating shutterspeed to counter the handheld shake, but I do prefer an underexposed look on supertelephoto shots too.
    But probably the most important factor that many of you guys fail to recognize; is that you don't get a second chance to shoot many of these shots. You just try to get something first time around and then it's gone. Speed is very much of the essence.
    One frame earlier (at 7fps) there were two unfocused rosellas (birds) in this hole. I wasn't quick enough on the focus. Second chance? histogram correction? lol
    EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.
    >> Anonymous 09/27/11(Tue)07:26 No.1401880
    >>1401855

    >But probably the most important factor that many of you guys fail to recognize; is that you don't get a second chance to shoot many of these shots.

    Many? Almost all your shots are of static subjects. And the moments you caught of live subjects are not exactly "decisive" moments, quite opposite in fact, they are merely stupid snap shits. You well suck and should quit photography.
    >> Anonymous 09/27/11(Tue)07:42 No.1401883
    >>1401880
    >You well suck and should quit photography.
    So you keep saying. You probably should seek some professional help with that.
    >> Anonymous 09/27/11(Tue)07:56 No.1401888
    >>1401855
    There's no need to fuck with EC when you could just bump up the ISO. It's the same thing as you have to bring the exposure up in post anyway.



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]