[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
Board
SettingsHome
4chan
/o/ - Auto


Posting mode: Reply
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Verification
reCAPTCHA challenge image
Get a new challenge Get an audio challengeGet a visual challenge Help
4chan Pass users can bypass this CAPTCHA. [Learn More]
File
Password (Password used for deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Japanese このサイトについて - 翻訳


Toggle
I spent the day sorting through and re-reading a few thousand e-mails from 2010, and it was really a blast from the past. What a year it was.
Thanks for an awesome 9 years, and for some great e-mails along the way.

As always, I read all of my e-mail and can be reached with questions/comments/concerns/hate mail/and plain ol' hellos at moot@4chan.org (or on AIM at MOOTCHAT).
tl;dr version of 2010: "SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, and VIRUSES: The Movie"

File: 1354707390341.jpg-(12 KB, 400x400, post-it-note-l.jpg)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
OK, so a question to the guys on this board who have been here longer than I. I have never attempted this before so any insight would be welcome

I am going to try and start some serious work on two stickies, maybe try and combine them into one super sticky but I don;t know if it will be possible

One would be along the lines of "What's a good first car/budget car under 5K"

The other would be along the lines of "What to look for/how to inspect a used car you are considering buying"


How does /o/ go about making a sticky? Open thread for us to discuss it/refine it? Who does one go about contacting to get a sticky put up?

Thoughts/opinions/advice gentleman?
>>
one sticky is already too much. fuck off.
>>
>vl turbo
>look for dose gas leakage
>>
>>7218820
Sounds good.

Going to start with the "Whats a good first car/car under 5K one first".

I have some rough shit pasted into sticky notes on my computer from various threads I have been in, I am going to try and start to organize it and draw up a table in Excel, maybe get a rough draft put up later this morning, early afternoon
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Wut car is good is really dependent on country.

You could do it with a flow chart....
>>
>>7218825
Well, since I am american, that's what I will start with. If someone on the board would like to collab with me on getting an Aus&Euro table/chart to add with it, I would be totally up for it.

There is certain shit that will be true no matter where you live, so I don;t think it would be to hard to add in non-US alternatives
>>
>>7218821
> i have no gf
> or friends LOL
>>
File: 1354709835368.jpg-(202 KB, 1846x852, Aus wut car is gud flowchart.jpg)
202 KB
202 KB JPG
>>7218825
Quick flowchart i made to narrow down choices
>>
>>7218851
>not making every option a VL commie
what the fuck are you doing with your life
>>
>>7218850
Awesome!

>>7218851
Problem is, I am looking to make something that is a little more complete so people have more of a reference. Looking to include things like pros and cons to each car, things to watch for, what you should expect to pay, Upkeep costs, things like that. It gets way to bulky for a flow chart


I am thinking I am going to start with a category chart, this is my rough outline, feedback welcome:

Intro bit with general advice, gonna try and build off this: "Unless you know someone who is just going to cut you an amazing deal, Pretty much anything under 2K is a gamble OP. Doesn't mean you can't win, but it means you can also lose big time. Only buy under 2K unless you have to have a car right now

Don't blow all your money on a first car/budget car. Aim around 2.5-3K, with a 5K absolute limit. If you DD it, its going to get beat up, no matter how careful you are, and if you are a newer driver, you don't need to buy something that is going to make you loose sleep for a month if you wrap it around a tree 6 months from now. Also, things WILL break, you are going to have to have some cash reserves to keep it up."

Start list as follows:

MVP: If we can get enough of a consensus, we will have an MVP car at the top

Econobox

Coupe

Lux/"classy"

Sedan

Sports car

Truck/SUV

Wagon

Special Snowflake

Would like to get it narrowed down to a solid 3 for each category, but if it looks like we can do more, I will

Things I want to include for each car: Pro/Con, known trouble spots, what you can expect to pay, and how easy they are to keep up
>>
File: 1354710904467.jpg-(249 KB, 1045x784, 2012-05-29 18.15.55.jpg)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>7218864
Doing with my life? Other than two jobs and uni?

>Pic related, My garage
>>
>>7218866
Cars I am planning on including from the start:

Civic
Corolla
Maxima
Altima
190E/300E
300E/240D
220/240C
Miata
Jetta/TDI
Volvo 850

What else do you guys think should make the list? What year range? Lets start getting some ideas and opinions out here
>>
File: 1354711446867.jpg-(491 KB, 972x1600, PC Buying Guide.jpg)
491 KB
491 KB JPG
>>7218866
It would be good to have a list of the best for each category, however the issues i have when someone asks wut car is good? always requires more information.

For instance, "Civic & GTFO" is all good until OP says they need to transport their dirtbike/5children/traverse rocky mountain passes.

The flowchart narrows down the choices, to which then recommendations can be made.

Having a flow chart supported by the list of best cars in categories would be good.

Here is an example of a good sticky guide
>>
File: 1354711619381.jpg-(51 KB, 600x450, 2d85ekp.jpg)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>7218881
For reliability's sake, i would stick to >1990.

Not to say that pre 1990 cars are unreliable, just that rust and electrical issues would be more prevalent.

>Good example Aus car that can be had for under $5k
>>
>>7218890
The /g/ one is actually what I was looking to try and model this one off of, although I wouldn't really call it a flow chart
>>
>>7218892
Fuckn' sick commy bruv.
Do you want a bad boy sticker with that?
>>
File: 1354713491744.png-(56 KB, 1090x825, alpha 0.1.png)
56 KB
56 KB PNG
Alright, thinking of building the chart as follows, thoughts
>>
And then this thread will die and nothing has been changed.
>>
>>7218946
Hell with it dying, I will make another one, I am going to get this done if it kills me
>>
>>7218948

Sounds like a plan. I'm in. Too bad the moderator hardly visits this board?
>>
I swear we already one of these at one point a few years ago but nobody looked at it cause HUR I DUN LIKE THOSE CARS WAT ELSE IS GUD
>>
>>7218820
Mod already said that there will never be wat car iz gud sticky because wat car iz gud threads in only thing keeping this board alive.
>>
So, skipping MVP, lets hear nominations in the econobox category? Do you fellows think Civic and Corolla should fit here, as I was thinking this would be the logically place to include them
>>
>>7218951

You're right. Also people keep asking what car is good even though they don't say what purpose will it be for etc. Also no car is perfect. Try to educate people about this.
>>
>>7218954

We should recommend Corolla.
>>
>>7218952
Hell, that's fine, and I am SURE people are still going to come here and ask what car is good, just like people STILL went on /g/ to ask "is this a good build??" when they had their sticky up.

Not everyone wants to come in and try and start/bump a thread about what car they should buy, I think a quick reference guide would be handy
>>
>>7218958
I hear Corolla. Anyone up for including Civic in this category?
>>
This is something I think we should all work on.

But I'm too fucking tired right now to care.
>>
>>7218881
But I read your list an no Imprezas? Don't include the other Subarus. Just the Imprezas.
>>
>>7218962
I want the communities input, hence why I made this thread. I know I don't have enough comprehensive knowledge to offer smart choices in every single category.

I gotta drive to campus, but I will be back on in about 20 minutes. Please guys, toss around nominations for the econobox catergory
>>
Has anyone been to /fa/ or /fit/? Their stickies work awesomely well. We should try the same.
>>
>>7218965
>>7218962

Fuck it. You need someone with Photoshop skills?

I can do plenty with Photoshop.
>>
>>7218966
>>7218967
We also might want to consider linking some "Don't buy this you fucking retard the engine is knocking / whatever obvious problem it has"

Something their dads may not have taught them.
>>
>buy a Hayne's or Chilton's repair manual for your car or for the car you are about to buy or a shop manual
>Hayne's and Chinton's will tell you what tools you need and how to repair your car and how to buy a used car

>repair manuals will tell you how to do the job and what you need
>start with simple things like how to change the air filter or tires
>if still interested keep exploring
>remember you need to know:
-how to fix something
-why you are fixing it
-why did it break
-what does the part / item do
-how does it do it

Keep asking yourself these questions when you work with your car and learn the answers.

Put that in the sticky and problem solved. I've told that to over 9000 people on this board alone and never heard anyone complain afterwards. I bought a Hayne's and Chilton's book after I bought my first American car 1980 Dodge Aspen Special Edition. Has helped me out.
>>
>>7218979
This could be at the end of sticky
>>
>>7218959
/fit/ is another great example of a board with a good sticky.

Threads range from "I should read the sticky" to variations on the sticky to things not covered by it.

It is certainly a good starting point
>>
Tripfags reactions when we will get this sticky:
http://youtu.be/VX7gFl7xnOE

Should I contact moot about this or will OP want to do that? Does the mod moderate other boards aswell or does he actually have a life since he is never here
>>
>>7218985
>>7218967

Beaten to it
>>
People who come here asking for advice without reading the sticky can be told to gtfo or ignored. Now we shouldn't do that because there are people coming here to ask advice who are willing to learn.
>>
Ok back

>>7218974
Yes, this might be a good thing to put in after we work throughthe catagories

>>7218980
>>7218979
Agree, the repair manual bit would make a great wrap up.

>>7218968
Will probably need some help getting all the images stiched together once we get all the categories flushed out

>>7218986
I will try and contact the 4chan admin email account since I dont really do IRC, if anyone wants to grab ahold of our moderator on IRC and let him know what I am up to, that would be great
>>
Here, someone is going to have to edit this because I'm seriously tired but I have ideas.

Tips on when you go out looking at cars:

OUTSIDE:
.What is the overall condition of the car?
.Is there any rust?
.Does it have any puddles of fluid coming from underneath it?
.What are the condition of the tires?
.Any visible body damage? If so it could have been in an accident.

INSIDE:
.What's the overall condition of the seats / carpet?
.Any noticeable water damage / dampness?
.Do the electronics work? (if applicable)
.Any gauges not work?
.Do the windows roll up and down without force?

ENGINE / ENGINE BAY:
JUST BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS SHINY DOESN'T MEAN IT RUNS WELL.
cont'''
>>
>>7218996
>>7218990
This. I think it would be very easy to have a sticky at the top with links to a US, Aus, and Euro buyers guide, and a "how to inspect a used car" guide. Would greatly improve post quality I think if we can get some good guides knocked up
>>
>>7219012
Will save this away in my raw notes for my "How to inspect a used car guide" good sir
>>
>>7219014
>>7219013
>>7219011
Sorry, those were all me, forgot to put my trip up on my laptop haha
>>
Ok, so as of right now, we only have 2 cars up for consideration in the econobox category, the civic and the corolla. come on guys, what are your othe nominations?
>>
>>7219018

Any decent condition old American car.
+easy to work with
+reliable

Only minus people might consider is the mileage some of them get.

http://www.allpar.com/slant6.html

One of the most reliable engine ever with good mileage.
>>
>>7219012

>Expanding

-Does all of the paint match?
>Mismatched paint is a sign of poor body repair.

>What things are you going to need to do to get it road worthy?
- all lights and indicators work/not broken?
-tyres in road worthy condition?
-shocks working/not leaking?
-cracked windscreen?
-brakes firm/not squeek?
-Noisy engine? Gearbox? Diff?

>Turn off radio to listen for unusual noises when test piloting the car.

Common rust places vary on cars, but most cars will gather rust in the boot/trunk, sills, lower doors and guards.

cont...
>>
>>7219025
>>7219029
Nice, looks better than my ugly ass spread sheet.

>>7219029
we need a specific model and year range to list
>>
>>7219012
ENGINE
Open the hood (Bonnet for you folks on the other side of the lake)
JUST BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS SHINY DOESN'T MEAN IT RUNS WELL.
.Check the oil. Is it black? If so then the owner might have not changed the oil recently, or who knows, not within the last 10K miles. Ask him / her!
.Any obvious damage / missing things / loose connections?
.Check the battery terminals. Look for white dusty substance / corrosion. (Corrosion is bad)
.Ask the owner / dealer about what modifications are done to this car. MODS ARE GENERALLY BAD. Unless you have worked on that specific car yourself, you have no idea what someone might have done to it.

DRIVING THE CAR:
How does it feel?
.Take it over a nice bump at an average speed. Did it take the bump well? Do the tires rub when it hits said bump? Did the suspension make any noise?
Something worth noting I forgot to put it, AVOID LOWERED CARS. These cars can eat tires and cause major suspension issues later in its life. (If it hasn't already)
.Give it some gas. How's the power delivery? Did it shutter? Did it "cough"?

TALKING TO THE OWNER
cont..
>>
File: 1354716883541.png-(37 KB, 1234x453, econobox.png)
37 KB
37 KB PNG
What I have for econobox so far
>>
>>7219031

Buy a 1980 Dodge Aspen with slant 6. Problem solved. Special Edition for couple of hp more.
>>
TALKING TO THE OWNER / AFTER DRIVE
This is actually pretty important. People can talk about what a car has been through. Cars can't.
.Check under car after the drive. Any fluids leaking?
.Why are they selling it?
.What's a few of the problems they had with it?
.Any major modifications? See: AVOID HEAVY MODS.

I know I'm missing something here.
>>
>>7219032

This shit can be found in the repair manuals brah.

20$ for a books isnt that much if you are buying a car anyway.
>>
>>7219040
>>7219041

See.
>>
>>7219036

>moels
>contorl
>>
>>7219036
Also If I get a comprehensive list of cars. I can shoop together a nice thing for people who will TL;DR.
>>
>>7219044
Fixed, any thoughts guys?

>>7219046
Nice, If we can power through getting all the raw data into a spread sheet, I am more than open to someone sprucing it up/making it look less like ass
>>
>>7219049
I still think you should do the spread.
My thing will mostly be a small amount of stats about the car / who should buy it / and how much it would cost.
>>
>>7219050
Will continue on

Come on guys, do you think I am on track with my comments about the civic and corolla?

And we need to get more nominations for a third econobox
>>
>>7219049

Did you contact moot or anyone about this already?
>>
>>7219030
Check if car has service history, and if service history is from that car.
Check the auto trans fluid if auto.
Ask the owner when was the last time they serviced the auto. It is often one of the most neglected components, and one of the most expensive.

Check brake fluid and clutch reservoir fluid. >This is another item that should be changed regularly that often gets overlooked.

IF you can see the brakes, try to look for heat spots or cracks on the discs, and thick/thin pads.

Look under the body/wheel arches for damage, dents or rubbing.

Check car on startup for smoke

Check to see if cold before test pilot
>car may run shit cold, and owner makes sure it is warm to hide coldstart problem.

What are the accessory drive belts like?
(have seen mates buy a car and belt goes on way home, car cooks because waterpump not working)

Being neat and clean doesn't mean that it is good. It could be a meticulous owner, or more likely has been tarted up for the sale.

If ever they say shit like "grandma's car, driven to church on sunday, only highway kms' they're lying sacks of shit.

Look out for model specific problems (google search, /o/ query or similar will be needed) i.e. Worn castor bushes

Budget for insurance/taxes/registration that will also need to be paid for after the purchase of the vehicle.
>>
>>7219053

Opel Corsa.
>>
>>7219054
Yeah, sent an email to admin@4chan.org explainging what we were trying to do and asking them to pin this thread for us
>>
>>7219057
Might be good for the euro version, but we need some more american options
>>
>>7219053
Nominate the Golf for something a bit different
>>
>>7218986
>>7218860
>>
>>7219060
I feel that. I would say we recommend the TDI for god tier diesel reliability?
>>
Here's what I think

Yes - Honda Civic
Yes - Toyota Corolla
Yes - Mazda Miata

Expensive but yes - Volkswagen Jetta/TDI
Don't these have reliablitlity issues? - Nissan Maxima / Nissan Altima
Bad money pits? Mercedes Benz 190E/300E Mercedes Benz 300E/240D 220/240C
Expensive? - Volvo 850 Wagon (Or any Volvo)

I put in for the imprezas but i've never owned one. Thoughts?
Also add suggestions for and why I'll add /subtract to list
>>
>>7219065
LOL WHY THE JETTA

Should be golf
>>
>>7219067
We have the gold on the table right now as the nomination for the 3rd econobox
>>
>>7219063
and economy
>>
>>7219069
lol *golf on the table
>>
>>7219063
The TDI's will be on my list
>I'll put the VWs under one car with an explanation to save clutter on the shoop
>>
>>7219071
OK I am feeling it. Unless someone else wants to put forth anothe ralternative for a 3rd US econobox, I will start writing up the Golf
>>
>>7219065
Need more nominations / reasons from this list
>>
>>7219076
Golf, Corolla and Civic are quite universal afaik, all with great qualities for the econobox category
>>
>>7219079
OK, going to write it up, will post the full econobox category for people to talk over once done
>>
So far my absolutes for my simple shoop. I'm going to keep the years out of it to make the shoop easy to understand. (Unless it's necessary, like a really bad year or something)

Honda Civic
Toyota Corolla
Mazda Miata
Volkswagen Golf
>>
File: 1354718460788.jpg-(51 KB, 660x497, crown_vic.jpg)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
We already have a picture of /o/ approved cars by price range
>>
File: 1354718614075.png-(39 KB, 1224x454, econobox.png)
39 KB
39 KB PNG
Ok, here is the first draft of the econobox category. Thoughts/opinions?
>>
>>7219091
Slow should be a con for all 3
>>
>>7219092
All cars under 5k are slow standard.
>>
>>7219090
care to post?
iirc it may be outdated, overpriced and not geared for noobs
>>
>>>/q/
>>
/o/ packages can be found at:
http://rs.4chan.org/
>>
File: 1354719180990.jpg-(1.47 MB, 2388x1708, 1349738356556.jpg)
1.47 MB
1.47 MB JPG
>>
>>7219104
Not very helpful to the 5000 and under crowd.
>>
>>7219106
God dammit I meant to say the DD crowd.
Like I said, Tired.
>>
>>7219106
Nor very detailed, looking to create something that is more of a guide than just a price range and some pictures.
>>
>>7219113
I'm going to have to resign my photoskills for when I'm not going on 30 whatever hours without sleep.

>Not my post btw
>prolly quoted wrong post
>That's old as fuck seen it 1,000 times.

Good luck longpost. Hell after I get some rest, if the sticky hasn't already been made, I'll check back. See what's up.
>This divorce is killing me.
>>
OK, here is revision 1 to the econobox. Put in a little header pointing out these are not sporty cars, added a little more to the golf
>>
File: 1354720435851.png-(39 KB, 1118x408, econo1.png)
39 KB
39 KB PNG
>>7219124
Forgot the damn pic haha

>>7219121
Thanks for the support man, hope to see you back soon
>>
>>7219125
>what is celica, mini cooper, integra, and grand am
>>
>>7219125
whoops need to correct the model year on the golf
>>
>>7219127
mini, integra, and grand am are not econobox cars. Will consider them when we get to appropraite category
>>
File: 1354721019691.png-(40 KB, 1117x407, econo2.png)
40 KB
40 KB PNG
Ok, econobox revision 2
>>
>>7219148
will file away for wagons

Anyone have any more feedback about the econoboxs so far?
>>
>Integra
>not an econobox

Hahaha. Do idiots actually believe this?
>>
>>7219164
The Volvo would fit more in the wagon category and the CV would be a better fit in sedan I would think, neither of those cars is what I would call an Ecobox...?
>>
>>7219163
Would call it a Coupe myself?
>>
I've had a list ready to be stickied since the beginning of last summer, but dead HDD.
Serious lack of Nissan Sentra in here.

Started on the 'sporty' econo's yet?

>>7219148
This, and the derivatives of the Chassis, 700/900/S90
>>
>>7219164
>implying a Volvo 240 gets any better gas mileage than a Crown Vic
>>
>>7219163
B-b-but that would imply being cheap, and economical, which the Integra is neither, being farther up the totem pole and under a luxury brand than Hondas actual economy car, the Civic.

>implying fwd = econo box
>>
File: 1354723167945.jpg-(34 KB, 387x319, niggwat.jpg)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>>7219218
Nigga wat.
>>
>>7219204
If I can get the general consensus that /o/ is ok with those three as the pics for ecoboxes, the next category I'd like to tackle is good solid middle of the road sedan
>>
>>7219239
CAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRY
CAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRY
CAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRYCAMRY
>>
>>7219251
Why camry over corolla? Not arguing just trying to get insight
>>
Under 5k - Civic
Under 10k - Civic
Under 25k - Civic
Under 50k - Civic
Under 100k - Civic

Seriously, if you need to ask /o/, just get a fucking Civic.
>>
>>7219239
Having any MPG requirements for each bracket?
The sedans are going to be a blandfest.
What do you think of sports FWD's? Integra/Celica/etc, or are they being superceded by RWD master race S13/14/etc.

The only thing I can see wrong with Civic/Corolla/TDI is the lack of the Sentra. And on the subject, you suggested sedan versions for each one, so why are you going to move on to Sedans? Maybe body styles should be listed
>>
>>7219267
Nope, no MPG req. Just good buys in the USA for 5K or under as a first car/budget car.

And I am trying to find the models that best represent each type. I know the Civic has a coupe, a hatch, and a sedan, but overall, i feel like the car is a best fit in the ecobox category because its cheap and reliable.

I want to make a sticky that flushes out the best options in each type, not one that just re-lists civic in every body style that it is made in

>>7219264
That kind of thing is what I would like this sticky to solve.
>>
>>7219267
wow i was looking at the sentra wiki page

the 6th gen only comes with manual

gotta love nissan for doing this
>>
File: 1354724946971.png-(27 KB, 1122x435, sedan 0.1.png)
27 KB
27 KB PNG
OK, at this point, we will move it on along to sedans!

Can I get some nominations from /o/ on what the best buys for 5k an under for sedans might be?(we are excluding the civic and corolla since we listed them in eco)
>>
>>7219102

Anybody make a thread there? Would prolly speed things up.
>>
>>7219331
I did, I shot an email to moot
>>
>>7219326
P71 and a Civic
>>
>>7219339
Civic was the pick in ecobox, we need other options here
>>
>>7219345
here or wagon?
>>
>>7219336

Yeah but did you also make a thread? He prolly has over 9000 millions emails to read.
>>
>>7219353
yeah I made a thread in q here:>>>/q/316723
>>
Camry and Sentra have also been mentioned? what do you think guys?
>>
File: 1354725511976.jpg-(151 KB, 800x600, 800px-BMW_318ti_1997.jpg)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
>>7219326
Volvo 200/700/900/S90
Nissan Maxima
Subaru Legacy
Toyota Camry
VW Passat TDI
BMW E36

And nominating E36/5 for econo car.
>>
>>7219365
Nice, I will try and create a poll with the popular choices, Ill post the link to it, and let /o/ vote, we can see what look like to be the top contenders


Keep giving me suggestions guys
>>
>>7219355

Good! Posted there.
>>
Acura Integra
Acura Vigor
Acura Legend
...
Too many many many many sedans
>>
I think the sticky should be more of a quide how to find a car on your own than to give ready examples.
>>
>>7219386
come on guys, more options, I would like to get about 25 solid ones, then I will make the poll and publish it and let people vote no it
>>
>>>/q/316723

Interesting points being made.
>>
Gonna bump

Need MORE SUGGESTIONS for 4 door sedans ladies and gentleman, would like to get 25 solid contenders, then put up a poll for people to vote on
>>
>>7219407
Last 90s/00s Buicks.

Pretty much any one of them
>>
>>7219414
give me a specific model I can put in a poll my man. I cant just put, any 90's Buick up for people to vote on
>>
>>7219407
You should make a list of what we have now because, honestly, this thread is tl;dr for me.
>>
>>7219416
What do you think guys, you think I should start a new thread? Or just make an all caps post here with what we have so for in sedans and request more suggestions?
>>
>>7219415
Buick Regal. My granny had one and it was a great car.
Had the l67, I think.
>>
>>7219391
Taurus SHO
Lexus ES/LS/GS
Subaru Impreza
Toyota Avalon
Honda Accord
Nissan Altima


Seriously if you want 25, just go to wiki and add every japanese, some euro, and a dash of american.
>>
We need this sticky but it has to have a lot more than just examples of shitboxes. Instructions are needed for other things too like what manuals to buy and what tool brands are good etc.

/fa/ has an excellent sticky which coveres clothes and style but also fabrics!
>>
>ban americans
>board becomes better
>profit???
>>
>>7219430
>acquire mod
>ban shitposters
>???
>profit

>not knowing how to underwear gnome profit
>2012
lel new2theinternet
>>
>>7219429
/fit/ has an extensive sticky that shows them how to do pretty much everything, leaving most of the discussion to be cam whoring and feel.
I for one welcome any discussion about how to fix cars or just general discussion.
I think the sticky should only be a car buying guide.
It'll weed out the 'wat car is gud' threads, at least.
>>
>>7219429
I agree, fit has a great sticky with multiple walkthroughs as well, but we have to start somewhere, and this sticky on good cheap/first car under 5 grand i think is as good a place as any to start

>>7219424
Thank you,
>>
>>7219439
Or at least allow the discussions to get better, since you can refer people to the sticky,
>>
This might take awhile so people keep coming back to this thread. I don't think any mod or admin will react to this thread in few days. It might take awhile so lets keep this up together.
>>
I don't think you lot have thought this through, you are providing tips just for one market, are automatically assuming that every visitor is american?

>best car for under $5k
wut
>best sedan (lists american cars)
wut

Come on /o/ actually think this shit through for once, there are no right or wrong opinions in the automotive world, everyones opinion will differ on something not everyone would agree on the same list, thats why the fucking idea is floored and biased toward one market.

If you are gonna make a sticky actually involve information that is useful for ALL the users of /o/, not a bunch of teenage muscle car fans from Wisconsin.

>inb4 mad euro fag

I'm american.
>>
>>7219444
True.
I can see this board turning into a specific persons' ideological haven.
I honestly don't mind all too much most of what happens in here.
I just really would like a car buying guide sticky.
>>
>>7219452

With general information what to look for and what manuals to buy etc...
>>
>>7219451
have thought it through, if you read the whole thread, I mentioned that once we get the format in place, anyone who wants to can adapt a euro/aus version.

This isn't an opinion thread, its a "general good ideas and decisions" thread for people who come to /o/ looking for car advice

Its absolutely possible to make a list that contains generally safe/solid buys for a first car/budget car.

>>7219452
me to, hence why I am trying to knock this up
>>
>>7219459
yeah but still peoples opinions will differ, some people get so deluded with the fact they own/fan of a certain car they disregard the fact it's a total shit house. You'll name some shit cars and i can bet someone will be majorly butthurt over it, it'll just go back and forth and cause even more issues then it's worth.
>>
>>7219461
Yeah, I agree on that actually.
I feel like I should go back to everything I said and delete it.
Oh well.
>>7219474
THIS
>>
>>7219469
>anyone who wants to can adapt a euro/aus version

So yeah this sticky will just involve one market.

Having a what to look out for on a first purchase or certain makes when buying a car is a good idea, but giving out a list for a specific market is biased, you'll need to break it down even more so, some people will only buy imports some people will only want to buy domestic.
>>
>>7219474

>don't name cars
>tell people how to look for the cars themselves
>problem solved

This is what I'm trying to say.
>>
>>7219488
>bias
Welcome to /o/.
And it's not our fault if no Aus or Euro wants to put time in to doing one, but it looks like the Mericans are trying.
>>
>>7219474
>>7219488
Just because I am willing to do one for the US market and no one wants to do one fro the euro market shouldn't stop me from working on mine. If the euro and aus guys want to make one and try and get it going, they are more than welcome to

And yeah people are going to argue, that's why you need to get a sticky up, gets lots of input on each category, and narrow things down. Of course people are going to argue and be deluded, but that's why you get the whole community involved.

If we can get this, I will gladly start work on a "what to look out for" sticky with anyone who wants to help
>>
>>7219514

Voted.
>>
>>7219508
Maybe because of the time difference people do work you know.........

>>7219510
Getting a general all rounded opinion from everyone will take forever, you are asking anonymity to work together and decide, unless YOU decide what goes where, then it's not /o/'s opinion its (like i said before) a certain person/groups opinion. Say in an hour when all the muscle car fans come home and get on if you've just spent the last hour making a list where there was only two guys who both happened to like bmw giving you input the opinion will biased and swayed.
>>
>>7219520
That's why we need to get this thread pinned, so we can leave the polls up for a couple days, so as to get everyone's input on the various catagotries for the sticky

In the mean time, I am just going to have to look after this thread the best I can and try and get people to vote, and if this thread dies, I'll make a new one
>>
>>7219514
Voted, and I think that the TDI's should be counted together, and just listed as VW TDI sedan.
>>
>>7219529
If people think thats sensible I'll add the votes for the Jetta and the Passat together when the I count up the totals
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Your posts and your hilarious stories of rustangs paid for in gold are the chemo that saved this board for me. I commend and support your efforts.
Sincerely,
Excarsalesfag still stuck with a Hyundai accent
>>
inb4 shitstorm
>>
>>7219537
Thank you sir, I am a firm believer that if you enjoy a community, you should invest in making it better. And hell I am gonna try.
>>
>>7219561

Not enough people seem to give a shit.
>>
>>7219586
Well, I'd love to vote but I honestly don't feel very qualified to. I only know of a few cars on that list well enough to suggest them off hand.
>>
>>7219586
Ah, about a dozen voters so far, the poll lets me live track the results


Come on guys, help us out, vote for the best sub5K sedan that isn't a civic or corolla!! Help us build this sticky!
>>
>>7219595
just woke up hear on the best coast, ill lend my thoughts
>>
>>7219607
well, im not fully awake, so i might have fucked up, but i think both moazda protege's and geo prism deserve a spot on there.

My family has had both for a very long time. The gro especially is a beast of a car, and its essentially a corolla that you can get cheaper
>>
>>7219622
oh and i may have added the protege twice, fyi

im still so tired that i may as well be drunk
>>
>>7219676
voted.

Why are we comparing sedans to econoboxes? Seems like a Camry or Accord could certainly make up for the lack of class in a Corolla or Civic, why not include that in chart 1?
>>
Newfag tripfag wants his name on the first page wow another trip wanting attention amazing
>>
>>7219676
>One last shameless self bump
You're not shameless faggot
>>
>>7219586
>dozen vot
Exactly

Newfag doesnt understand that if this sticky is made /o/ will die

Fucking op is a retard
>>
>>7219514
lmao@this thread
>>
>>7219907
That didn't come out right but I know what ur sayin

Fuck this, hope a mod deletes this shit
>>
This topic makes no sense, different cars in different areas.
>>
>>7219924
Yup

Op is from amurica and thinks everyone elkse is too
>>
If this gets a sticky whats the point of coming to /o/?
>>
>>7219930
There would be no point :p
>>
>>7219935
Don't use emoticons you flapping vag.

Everyone get a Civic and STFU.
>>
>>7219930
>my car is broken and I can't figure out why
>look at these awesome pictures of cars
>fourza
>i just bought a new car
>meet ups
>f1 races
>trolling
Come on.
>>
File: 1354736201878.jpg-(61 KB, 545x363, rental-car.jpg)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
I found a pic of OP, seems legit
>>
>>7219942
lmao
>>
Oh yes can we pretty pretty please have ANOTHER FUCKING STICKY I HAVE TO SCROLL PAST.

Fuck get rid of all the stickies.
>>
>>7219952
Anon cannot into clicking.
Just hide the sticky.
>itsfuckingnothing.jpg
>>
>>7219952
This.

Stickies are annoying. Our motorcycle one is filled with common sense its stupid.

Why the fuck does there have to be any stickies? Maybe we could have actual good topics if no one does a sticky.

Yes please lets keep arguing about the FRS. Might as well, since all the good topics will be covered by stickies.
>>
>>7219952
ffs this would keep you from having to scroll through all the goddamn threads about WAT CAR IS GUD
>>
>>7219960
Why should I have to. Fuck you trip fag you're probably op

LOOK AT ME I AM A FUCKING TRIP FAG ATTENTION!!! HEY LOOK!!! MEEEE!!!!

Fuck you, you otter mode skinny fuck
>>
>>7219032
>Check the oil, is it black? If so then owner hasn't changed oil recently

Bullshit, I change my oil every 5000km and it goes black within a month
>>
>>7219236
Yeah but the autotragic got 19 city 22 highway.
>>
This thread, my.fucking.sides
>>
>>7219971
*17 city. 19 overall.
>>
>>7219967
Agh, fuck, I am ottermode skinny fuck.
At least I contribute to this board with pictures of car and general car discussion.
All I was doing was trying to help you, and I ended up getting trolled.
;_;
>>
>>7218818
>one sticky is already too much. fuck off.

This pretty much says it all doesn't it.
>>
da fuq just happened in this thread?

jesus
>>
>>7219977
You help nothing and just post your pics like all tripfaggots.

How do you think we know what you look like, fucking moron.
>>
>>7219977
Show us ur abs tough guy. Dem guns r 2 big 2 deal wit
>>
>>7219968
What do you use, shitty dino oil on a 200,000 engine with shit filters?
>>
File: 1354736912086.jpg-(27 KB, 472x367, Op eats 9000 dicks.jpg)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
sage in all fields
>shit idea is shit
>>
>>7219996
lol

>filename
>>
No more stickys fucking hell
>>
File: 1354737001062.jpg-(372 KB, 799x535, mach1_2.jpg)
372 KB
372 KB JPG
>>7219984
I've posted my picture like once or twice in troll threads.
If you follow my posts so much, how do you not see me post in other threads?

My feelings are starting to get hurt, guys. I'll stop getting butthurt about camwhoring if you stop getting butthurt over not knowing how to hide threads.
Post cars.
>>
Another trip trying to make a name for himself

Nothing to see here people, move on.
>>
File: 1354737064658.gif-(732 KB, 720x544, 5JLQg.gif)
732 KB
732 KB GIF
>>7219996
Yes, I'd much rather have thread after thread of the same topic with the same responses and the same trolls instead of one centralized post I could easily hide. OP sure is a fag!
>>
>>7220003
I think the issue is some anons save pics of trips and post them over and over.

But seriously, this is a stupid idea. Stickies are gay as fuck its bad enough we already have one useless sticky
>>
>>7220012
this, jesus christ
>>
>>7220012
Surprise surprise, another trip wants the sticky.

All attention seeking whores.

Help each other out to get noticed.

>Gee I wish I was a big faggot so I could try and be cool.
>>
>>7220027
I just wish all the trips would go away
>>
>>7220035
Isn't there a function to hide them?
I just think people, including myself admittedly, are overthinking this whole board.
>>
>>7220035
>/o/ becomes tripless board
>/o/ evolves from shit tier to something great
>everyone wins

Fuck the OP and fuck the Trips that defend him. Suck dick somewhere else and get the fuck off /o/
>>
>>7220039
You can hide all tripfags
You can hide stickies
You can hide bulletins
It's all build right into the board

Some people just have a dragon dildo up their ass.
>>
>>7220046
Agreed

Trips are what is ruining this board
>>
>>7220048
All it is with you assholes is trip drama, worse than fucking women.

Why don't you learn a bit about cars, drop the trip, and then come back when you can offer something to /o/
>>
This thread is bad and you all should feel bad
>>
>>7220059
No more stickies pls
>>
File: 1354737575142.jpg-(144 KB, 800x531, 2coolguys2.jpg)
144 KB
144 KB JPG
>>7220046
Only retards think this way.

Forced anon has been tried. Know what happened? All the shitposters were impossible to track and block and without a name to hold them accoutable to themsevles there was MORE shitposting not LESS shitposting and moot removed it.

Do you really think your least favorite tripfag would stop saying stupid shit if they couldn't put a name to it? Do you really think they wouldn't just figure out some other way to mark their identity?
>>
>>7220050
fuck all this jabber. Piston makes some awesome threads and excellent discussions are to be had in Amerifag's bike threads. Not all trips are created equal.
>>
No thanks op
>>
I think it speaks volumes that so few people have voted.

We don't need this sticky.
>>
>>7220055
You probably think most of everything is worse than fucking women.
But being a dick aside, don't over generalize a board as one thing. You're the one posting about who horrible trips are while not really contributing much to the board.
OP is just giving us an idea and we're all working together to try an improve on it.
Anyway, I'm done posting in here, unless y'all have anything else to say.
>>
>>7220064
>Only retards think this way.
Only retard here is you.
>>
>>7220073
How could you say that when half of /o/ is a bunch of threads about wat car is gud? It give us room to discuss much better topics.
>>
>>7220077
Eat a massive cock you aids infested dick sucker?
>>
>>7220081
>obviously not a trip

lol
>>
>>7220080
he gave an example which you ignored. Come on now.
>>7220077
I enjoy your contributions to various threads around /o/. Don't let these other anon cunts try to destroy a great idea.
>>
File: 1354737862646.jpg-(65 KB, 500x380, arguing.jpg)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>7220082
>>
Stickies are gay and take up too much space
>>
>no posts for awhile, thread is going pretty slow
>suddenly, mad posts nearly every minute or so for the last 30 mins!

i bet this is finally the majority of the board voicing its opinion, totally
>>
>>7220086
I've never tripped in my entire life, but proving that to you doesn't mean anything. Check my IP if you want, I give 0 fucks. I'm here to help a good cause.
>>
>>7220080
An excellent rebuttal that hits all the points I stated.

>>7220081
>How could you say that when half of /o/ is a bunch of threads about wat car is gud? It give us room to discuss much better topics.

Exactly. Don't like the sticky? Hide it and you'll forget it's even there and the newfags can use it. This is why /g/ got a PC build guide. It was the first time they had any semblance of agreement on anything and it's constantly discussed and updated.
>>
ArizonaAztec is ok, but Walter is an underage that knows nothing about cars.

Anyways this is a stupid idea.
>>
>>7220100
>Comparing a pc build guide to a car purchasing guide

I expect you to say dumb shit but this is beyond time and space.

Marking this for trolling, its obviously not wanted and just pissing everyone off
>>
>>7220102
You've failed to explain why this is a stupid idea, or why Walter is how you describe. Your ideas hold no merit.
>>
I support this idea

It would clear up a lot of /o/ for other shit
>>
>>7220114
>pissing everyone off
Thats about all its doing.

Stay classy /o/
>>
>>7220114
How on earth? Customization of computers was HUGE on /g/, and it was pissing of the regulars because the board was flooded with nubs asking the same stupid questions. It was a huge stretch on quality control, which is equitable to this issue.
>>
>>7220116
OMG OMG another trip supporting the idea.

>unexpected.jpg
>>
>>7220120
What the fuck does me having a trip have anything to do with it?

It's a good idea
>>
car and driver does a "10 best" car list for each year, and used to do it with categories. I'd love to see something like this from /o/

carand driver categories were:

>Family Sedan
>Full Size Sedan
>Luxury Sedan
>Luxury Sports Car
>Luxury Sports Sedan
>Muscle Car
>Performance Car
>Sports Coupe
>Sports Sedan
>Wagon

And adding more categories would be a good idea, such as:

>used car
>new car
>under $5k/10k/15k/20k ect.
>best interior/exterior
>reliability
>>
This is now an "anon vs trip" thread

>FIGHT
>>
>>7220114
Naturally the act of building a computer and buying a car are not analagous. That's not what I was
>implying
But the same problem existed there as does here; people constantly asking for advice on a singular topic with thread after thread all over the board about it for literally years before someone finally compiled a list of shit and said HERE. READ THIS.
>>
No sticky
>>
>>7220120
<< anon here supporting the idea
What is with all this prejudice? What does tripping have to do with anything?
>>
Please don't sticky this
>>
>>7220128
This. THIS THIS THIS. Over 9000 times this. Coming from a successful model is a fantastic idea.
>>
>>7220129
Well, I wouldn't say that.
More like a single anon troll vs easily trolled trips.
I don't know why people on 4chan have such a
hard time with people having different opinions.
;_;
captcha: harmony ocatved
>>
What a shit storm this is.

Sticky would be a bad idea, clearly based on the posts.
>>
>>7220136
Why wouldn't we sticky such important information?

I'm beginning to suspect this guy just ignores other anons.
>>
>>7220144
>>bad idea
>>doesn't say why
>>blames trips for shitposting
>>
>>7220144
Agreed.

Less /o/ drama plox
>>
>>7220144
Why would it be a bad idea?

It would take all the shitty posts we get everyday and condense them into one post, easily hideable
>>
I would prefer not to look at this cluster fuck of a thread. 90% of it is arguing.

This is typical /o/

Also this was a dumb idea for a sticky
>>
Stickys are so annoying.
>>
>>7220162
So hide it

Why is hiding such a hard idea to understand to people?
I haven't seen the motorcycle sticky for months
>>
Fuck this thread.
>>
>>7220169
Why should we all have to hide something maybe 10 people want.

Fuck off idiot.
>>
File: 1354738643960.jpg-(29 KB, 200x200, 1335976871055[1].jpg)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
Guys, this thread has been spammed to all hell by one stupid anon who keeps samefag trolling the trips and spamming the same stupid shit regarding:
>>this is a bad idea
>>fuck stickies
>>im gonna post the same shit and ignore everyone
>>
>>7220174
>oh man, sure is hard as fuck to press a button once

Do you enjoy seeing ten topics that are exactly the same everyday?
>>
>>7220169
Are you listening?

>We don't want this
>"hide it" if you don't

Go away trippy, leave the convo to the big boys.
>>
File: 1354738719067.jpg-(216 KB, 800x600, Troll Car.jpg)
216 KB
216 KB JPG
>>7220177
We know, but thank you for bringing it up.
>>
>>7220177
Ya we don't want it new fag.
>>
>>7220183
Why don't you want it?

All I've seen is because it'd be annoying to see
So you hide it, so you'll never see it again
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
NOPE
>>
File deleted.
>>7220172
this
Just stop posting.
This is clearly not going anywhere and it's not doing it fast.
Just creating unnecessary animosity between people.
>>7220177
Also, this.
Also, sage.
>>
>>7220191
This this this
>>
Why do we want 2 fuckign stickies. one is annoying enough.
>>
>>7220192
We don't need a sticky of bullshit
>>
>ITT the reason I tripped up, so I wouldn't be associated with the shit that anon can become
>>
>>7220208
This whole thread is bullshit.

Let the topic die, hopefully it will fade away and we can get back to business.
>>
File: 1354739025183.jpg-(779 KB, 800x4000, 1354663616147.jpg)
779 KB
779 KB JPG
>>7220212
Fuck you I will post what I want.

You agreed that we don't need a sticky, so get off my dick
>>
>>7220215
I don't want the sticky either.

>BTW what in the name of fuck is that pic??? O_O
>>
No sticky
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Fuck off OP
>>
>>7220215
Nobody ITT has given a single good reason this plan should not continue.
>>
>>7220222
Thats good, because thats pretty fucked.
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
No one wants your sticky op.

Go to /soc/ with the attention whoring
>>
>>7220219
>hasn't ever seen a soviet head transplant
U 12, m8?
>>
>>7220227
Well many scientists have experimented with keeping dog heads alive outside of the body, on both sides of the iron curtain, but the pictures of the robot body is fake

There are videos on youtube of experiments with keeping a dog head alive, go check it out
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Dumb ass idea.

>>7218847
This, op just has no life and wants internet fame.
>>
>>7220230
what's your opinion on this shenanigans, truckerfag? this feels like a sticky we could use.
>>
Its weird that all the trips are agreeing...;maybe all the trips are the same person. Could you imagine? lel

Anyways a vote for no.

Also can remove the other sticky we already have?
>>
>>7220245
>Also can remove the other sticky we already have?
This should happen. We have a daily bike thread -_-
>>
>>7220245
kinda wierd how all the anons in the thread keep spewing the same bullshit
>>
you guys are retarded. If you want to remove the bike thread, it only takes one click and you never have to see it again.

Also, this sticky is a good idea. it keeps the board clean.
>>
>>7220245
Stop fucking samefagging and bumping this shit

You are a dumbass

Tripfags are accountable for the shit they do, that's why they tend to be a little smarter than anon

Just fucking hide it, Jesus. I haven't seen it in months, but it's like a net that catches the visitors who would otherwise shit up the board with repeating question threads
>>
What the fuck would this be needed? Every reason listed is stupid, yes lets have less good topics and more shit ones like "miatas are gay" and "mustang vs FRS"

Fuck you, op
>>
>>7220259
>wat kar is gud
>good topics

Jesus, anon has fallen to a new low
>>
Trips and stickies should not be allowed.

>There, I said it. Stay mad plebs.
>>
>>7220264
Better that other shit topics.
>>
No sticky
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Do not want

Kill it with fire
>>
>>7220265
anons like this faggot should not be allowed

shamelessly bumping this tread to olivion, keeps giving shit reasons and generally buttmad about everything
>>
>>7220265
You do realize you're just about the only person keeping this thread alive, right?

>>7220267
How? It would lessen the ratio of shit:good by removing some shit topics

Alright, I'm done with this fucking thread. This one anon is just fucking samefagging it like a mad man, and he's probably just some 12 year old kid sitting at the family computer giggling like mad right now
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
>I am going to try and start some serious work on two stickies
Oh man you are one fucking asshole.

2 fucking stickies? We already have 1 and thats too much you fucker.

FUCK OFF
>>
>>7220285
>2 fucking stickies?
Holy shit I didn't know he wanted two! What a dumb cunt! Hahahaha
>>
>>7220287
Yea hes got some fucking nerve.

No sticky!@!
>>
>>7220283
I dunno, this is a good topic, it's worth fighting that other goddamn anon over it.

I can see this sticky benefiting /o/ immensely. A good resource for the clueless is never a bad idea, especially all the mixed info trolling faggots and srs bsns users contribute to such threads. I wonder how many poor visitors have actually tried to fuck around with blinker fluid, etc.

>>tl;dr: solid resources are good. Lets show 'em what /o/ can do.
>>
>NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY >NO STICKY
>>
>>7220294
Hi OP
>>
No sticky

We have 1 and we don't need 3 or whatever the fuck op is going on about.
>>
>>7220303
>We have 1 and we don't need 3 or whatever the fuck op is going on about.
lmao

ya this thread just shows how shit of an idea 10,000 stickies are lulz
>>
Stickies are not needed. What a waste of board space.
>>
This is supposed to be an anon imaging board not a fucking forum.

Fuck off with this shit.
>>
I've just about had it with the trips around here.

Worse than any other board.
>>
no sticky
>>
Yes lets have 10 stickies thats what I want! Yay happy times on /o/ fo sho
>>
Here's an idea:

>make 20 stickies
>shut down posting

/o/ is the best board ever
>>
I like how this one goddamn anon faggot keeps bumping about how much he hates stickies... But considering all the bumps, this thing has pretty much been on top for like an hour for all to see, practically stickied. Great job anon.
>>
>>7220358
Stickies are not needed on /o/

Stop with the pleb
>>
>>7220365
Let me try one last time

Give your reason why this should not be done
>>
>>7220367
Me? I just hate a cluttered board with stickies.
>>
>>7220370
Yes its annoying.

Keep it on /fit/
>>
>>7220367
He won't. It's a bummer. A good idea shot down by an angry preteen nub who doesn't understand the importance to traffic and flow to what could be an otherwise better faring board.
>>
>>7220370
Stickies do not create clutter. Over 9000 threads over the same topic create clutter.
>>
File: 1354741330592.jpg-(65 KB, 769x273, hide it faggot.jpg)
65 KB
65 KB JPG
>>7220370
>>7220373
Is this really more annoying than constant "wat kar is gud" threads?
>>
This thread sucks balls man
>>
Fuck science for all things sticky! heh
>>
>>7220396
tru tru

Ima hang out fr a bit see wat goes dwn. Trips gettin trolled n steam rolld
>>
Put current and new sticky in same sticky

Everthinkofthatfucker.jpeg
>>
Haha wow, the things that can happen while you are at work...
>>
>>7222079
Fuck it, I will just finish it myself, guess at the ones I am not certain about, and posted the completed list for people to debate.

1.)Thread got way to big for people to figure out what was going on

2.)Oh god the trolling....
>>
Bump for great idea
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
FUCK NO we dont need another outdated stickey that no one reads
>>
lel it got stickied
>>
haha

Suck it single pissed off anon

Looks like you better learn how to hide
>>
File: 1354776531430.gif-(29 KB, 482x800, 1354411250763.gif)
29 KB
29 KB GIF
>>
So longpost, where are you up to?
>>
Ok guys, moot just got back with me and was kind enough to pin this thread for us so we can get some serious, ongoing discussion about this sticky.

What I am trying to accomplish by doing this

Get a list together of the top 3 cars in the following categories (may add or drop as the community gives input) for the purpose of making a "whats a good cheap car (less than 5K)" sticky

Econobox
Sedan
Coupe
Convertible
Sports Car
Wagon
SUV/Truck
Special Snowflake

So far I have very rough drafts of the econobox, sedan and coupe categories, which I will post bellow this. Look it over, give feed back, offer options. Toss around ideas. I don't care what cars end up on this list, I just want to make the best list possible.
>>
File: 1354777047467.png-(36 KB, 1094x345, RD1.png)
36 KB
36 KB PNG
Rough draft of econobox
>>
Definatly separate SUV's and trucks, there's no question there

And I'm just reiterating, but I say add a roadster category and a cheap straightline speed category
>>
>>7223506
*lists for yurop to come later
>>
File: 1354777139483.jpg-(114 KB, 814x517, eat.jpg)
114 KB
114 KB JPG
Back in my day if you wanted to know something you would lurk the fuck more rather than cover the front page in stickies.

99.9% of whatever people want to know from 4chan could be learned in 5 minutes of google anyway.
>>
what the hell?
>>
File: 1354777267786.png-(33 KB, 1104x336, rd3.png)
33 KB
33 KB PNG
Ok second try, rough draft of coupe
>>
>>7223528
True, although now we will be able to refer them to 'the sticky' and discussion can build from there instead of endlessly reiterating the same answers for the same questoins.
>>
File: 1354777320771.png-(34 KB, 1097x329, rd4.png)
34 KB
34 KB PNG
lastly, rough draft of sedan
>>
>>7223537
"So you something"
>>
>>7223521
Ok, I am completely down for seperarting truck and SUV.

I am thinking of dropping the convetible category and replacing it with either the roadster or "peed for your dollar" since you never really here people asking for "help me pick a convertible" on /o/
>>
>>7223547
fixed
>>
Some people in another thread had already suggested dropping the Hyundai in the coupe section, and replacing it with either a Celica or an Eclipse, thoughts gentleman?
>>
>>7223537
camry should be the alt for the accord
>>
>>7223565
Celica, much longer running line that is more universal
>>
>>7223576
Agreed.

Camry/Avalon
>>
>>7223578
can we get some pros and cons for the celica?
>>
>>7223598
Toyota reliability
styling
boring
>>
How about instead of a poll about what car is the best somebody makes a simple yes/no poll on how many people want this as a sticky?

/o/ doesn't need another sticky, and it's sure as hell not going to stop all the wat car is gud threads because a lot of people (like me) ignore stickies. It will just piss off the people who regularly come here.

Make a poll about how many people want this.
>>
>>7223617
So you're an idiot?

Thanks for letting us know
>>
>>7223621
What are you in grade 4? Fuck off.
>>
File: 1354778706836.jpg-(9 KB, 200x197, 1309140674157s.jpg)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>7223627
>>
File: 1354779007118.jpg-(457 KB, 1024x768, torty 2.jpg)
457 KB
457 KB JPG
gid sticky
>>
OK, coupe section revised to include the Celica in place of the Hyundai.
>>
God forbid you fuckers HIDE the fucking sticky.

I haven't seen the fucking bike one since the built-in extension was included.
>>
Yaaaay it was stickey-ed
>>
OP IS A FAGGOT NIGGER
>>
File: 1354780490480.png-(109 KB, 1090x968, first3.png)
109 KB
109 KB PNG
Ok, knocked together the first three categories together, rough raft v0.2

Thoughts, comments, feedback
>>
>>7223718
cancer
>>
>>7223718
You shouldn't leave older Mustangs out of the coupes. They're one of the best bang for your buck in the used car market and although they're nothing special, they're generally reliable. You can easily find a foxboxy or jellybean one for 5k or less

Pros:
Cheap
Fun
Reliable
Largest aftermarket support after Civic

Cons:
Handling
Interior
Fuel economy
>>
>>7223736
Would you offer it as an alternate, or to replace one of the existing 3?
>>
>>7223745
>ignores miata
>>
>>7223750
I am thinking the miata will be a better fit in sports car/roadster?
>>
>>7223752
Well, for the gay anons

I think your chart needs to have way more than 3 vehicles.

Just tell people to get a honda civic.
>>
>>7223745
Not sure. I'd probably put it in place of the Celica myself. If it's not an alltrac or GT four, it's not really in the same class as the others. Can you even get a proper AWD Celica for under 5k? It also makes sense to have at least one American car on your list.

I don't know the common problems on those older Mustangs, although I've never heard anything specifically bad. I'd have to Google it.
>>
>>7223764
I just Googled it. The only common problem is rust. Otherwise they're pretty bomb proof.

Ones that have been bagged on/street raced a lot will tend to have valve tick from bad/sticky lifters or a bad pushrod and they sometimes have a 3rd gear grind. Those are things to look out for if you want a car that wasn't bagged on.
But both of those things don't actually stop the car from working, they're just annoying.
>>
Are we going to cover AWD cars?

Some Imprezas are below 5k.
>>
>>7223790
I am just not sure you can find them frequently enough under 5K for them to make it
>>
>>7223802
I'm getting about 20 for my local CL here in the PNW.

I don't know much about them though.
>>
>>7223817
Hmmm

If we were gonna add it, in what category, and as an alternate or to replace one of the three? If so, which one?
>>
>>7223823
Probably an alternate for one of the coupes? The 2.2 is pretty fun to drive, but I don't know about their reliability.

Link related
http://portland.craigslist.org/clk/cto/3439027123.html
>>
>>7223838
Hmm, thanks man, I will look into it some more
>>
>>7223838
Maybe making a "Honorable mentions" section with short explanations?
Not sure lol

Like I said I've driven one once in the woods (I'll probably buy one) and it was a blast but I have no clue as to what owning one is like.
>>
>>7223849
Might rework the "alternates" section as an "alternates and honorable mentions" section, give enough space to give a short explanation why
>>
>>7223858
I'd say that you should have an alternatives and honorable mentions section, completely separate from the categories

Because unless we get an absurd number of categories, we're going to have good cars that won't fit in anywhere
>>
>thumbsup.jpg
>>
>>7223867
Hmm, my plan for good cars that don't fit anywhere was the special snowflake category.

I see what you are getting at though. I will rework what I have now turning the "Alternates" category into a "Alternates and honorable mentions" category, you guys tell me what you think, If you like it we can run with that.

if not, I will start a scratch list of good cars that don't fit and we can work a separate honorable mentions and alternates at the end.
>>
Guys. what if WAT racing development made REVIEWS on cars on youtube or something?

like first we'd start with all the cars we actually own.
review those, aftermarket parts all the ricers have, etc
>>
>>7223882
Ah, I was thinking special snowflake would be like, cheap good first cars that are also pretty unusual and cool. You know, something your buddies not going to get also
(Also, I think the MR2 might fit that. I know it's pretty common on /o/ to be known and stuff, but any non-car person is going to think a mid-engined car is going to be amazing)

I say you have various categories, like you do, and have three to five cars in each categories, like you do, and then just have a list at the end of general stuff that would also be fitting for a cheap first car. Cars that have no connections to other categories, kind of like a "check this list over and see if you fall in love" kind of thing

Like, the CR-Z. I know it's completely out of the price range, I'm not saying it should be on here. But it's a good car that wouldn't fit anywhere on the list

If none of that made sense, or if I'm like, insulting you or anything, that may be. I'm tired as fuck, and I just can't sleep tonight for some reason
>>
>>7223901
No, no motorcycles
There's already a sticky for that
>>
>>7223902
not insulting at all, I want peoples input.

I think I am going to have to limit each category to 3, otherwise things start getting out of hand, but I like your "fall in love you buy" idea for a list at the end

And I see what you mean about the special snowflake category. In fact I think I like it better.
>>
>>7223912
Yea, I completely understand wanting to keep it to three. I applaud you for taking this task on
I still remember when you were making your first topic. That was one fun thread

For the list at the end, you can always just list the name and years to look for, and like, just say to ask or research further about them, so you can list a lot of cars without having to go through all the research and writing about them that you're doing about the three for each category
>>
>>7223923
I am all up for the list at the end. Will be easier to see what cars we overlooked once we get the main categories out of the way
>>
File: 1354784935749.png-(119 KB, 1094x1032, RDv0.3.png)
119 KB
119 KB PNG
Ok guys, rough draft for first 3 categories, v0.3

Changed the Alternates row into a "Alternates and Honorable mentions" row with a brief description of why

thoughts, comments, feedback welcome
>>
>>7223952
Why have you restricted the Celica to those years?
Why no love for the last gen?
My dad has one, and it's an awesome car. It's a 2000's, and it's been incredibly reliable. He's put over 150,000 on it now, and he just had to replace the factory battery a few months ago

Other than oil changes and one MAF sensor, that's all he's had to do
>>
>>7223958
It gets rice taxed a lot around here, so I was worried about going higher lest I push into cars you cant get for 5K.

I'll look into the 2000's some more, see if it looks like the prices jive
>>
>>7223967
Yea, I guess they are hard to find without being riced, but you can get them for less than $5k if you do find one

My dad's is a really fun car to drive. Manual, and completely stock. It's not a GT-S, but it's got enough power. But it's one of the best handling fwd cars ever made. It sticks to lines better than coke addicts
>dat stock camber
>>
ITT : underage tripfags who have never even owned a car
>>
Any ausbr/o/'s on?
I have a few ideas for some cars that would be australia only, i don't have the time right now to make a chart up but ill chuck around ideas if someone else wants to write it up.

Otherwise we could have an extra section for aus/europe at the end, most cars are the same but there's a couple (falcodore, skyline, etc.) that could be extras
>>
>>7223952
for the 3 series you should put under cons : unreliable as fuck, over engineered.
>>
>>7223952

>recommending a corolla over a civic

those cars are a piece of shit. civics NEVER die
>>
>>7223952

make sure to add the Prism with the corolla. exact same car and can be found cheaper sometimes
>>
>>7224225
Pretty sure I have seen just as many 300K corolla's as civics
>>
>>7224230

invictus said civics are much better and i know he knows his shit
>>
>>7224233
so you are trying to say that a corolla is an unreliable car?
>>
>>7224168
anonymous bus rider
>>
>>7224175
Grey imports and falcodores would be the only real additions to an strayan infopic
>>
File: 1354801066571.png-(126 KB, 1094x1032, RDv0.4.png)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
Alright, morning folks, some further revisions to the Econobox/Sedan/Coupe listing. Added in alternates/honorable mentions to all categories. Tweaked year and mileage recommendations on certain models based on some further research.

As always, comments/thoughts/input are welcome

Rough draft v0.4 posted below
>>
File: 1354801879086.jpg-(88 KB, 582x359, zoolander_school_1.jpg)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
>>7224406
What is this!

There isn't any GM's on here.
>>
>>7224427
then suggest one, why you think it should be on there, and what you would have it replace.
>>
>>7224435
GM W-Body platform. Mid 90's and Up.
Coupe / Sedan.

Any GM car powered by a 3800 Series II.
(Buicks, Pontiacs, Chevrolets) Specifically the W-body platform. Cars come in floaty Comfy four door Buicks to supercharged 2 door Pontiac GTP's. These cars are EVERYWHERE and can be purchased for cheap. Junkyards / Craigslist / Kijiji are FULL of parts for these cars.

Common problems: Intake Gasket failure (Expensive difficult repair), plastic coolant elbows (Easy cheap repair).

>Inb4 everyone starts hating on the 3800 and W-body platform

you can't really kill a 3800. I've bounced mine off the rev limiter with a lifter tick for three years now and it still runs tip-top.
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Why is this a sticky?
Obviously no one is going to read through 908 comments to figure out what car to buy.
>>
>>7224483
It is a pinned thread to help make a "what car to buy sticky".
>>
>inb4 wats a gud kar for 6k, 10k, or 15k

ITT: implying the people who come here for car advice aren't trolls
>>
>>7224446

>GM fans actually believe this shit
>>
I think this is a terrible idea. Aren't you supposed to be 18 or older on 4 chan? The people getting these first cars are going to be younger for the most part.
>>
>>7224563
I'm 22 and looking at a car in the 3-5k range, my first was at 19 was just under 2k. Most of my friends have a vehicle around that price range and none of them are close to 17 or less.
>>
>>7224235

not unreliable per say, just not even close to civic quality
>>
>>7223974
So what you're saying is its grounded to the ground?
>>
Alright, I would like to open the floor to nominations for the "Sports Car" category
>>
>>7224892
FWD or RWD or both
>>
Nice! You got this stickied OP. Well done! +1
>>
>>7224919
Both
>>
>>7224923
Toyota Celica GT4/Alltrac
Honda Prelude SH/4WS/Si
Nissan S13/14
Nissan Z
Mustang
Camaro
DSM AWD Turbo
Mazda Miata
Honda S200
BMW M3/M5/M6
MB E190

Are talking only coupes or sedans too
>>
>>7224928
Hmm, I would think coupe makes the most sense


You can't get an S2000 for under 5K though. Dont think you could get a BMW M for under 5K either....
>>
So whats up? What has been done?
>>
>>7224932
well, this is the most current rough draft I have:>>7224406

We are currently taking applications for sports cars
>>
>>7224931
Slipped my mind, but maybe older models.
S2k probably not so easy to find for that much.

Acura ITR
Subaru RS2.5
Mazda MX-3
Mazda MX-6
VW Corrado
Lexus SC
Toyota MR2
BMW E30/36/etc
>>
>>7224937

No American cars.
>>
>>7224947
If he's been doing it by vote than it's not his fault.
Also most american cars of the 90's VS Japanese 90's?
Though I do like them SHO's.
>>
>>7224947
Have the Focus as the alternate to the VW, and really didn't get much traction from the community in having an american car in the top 3. Really only had one poster who suggested anything american

However I think the mustang is likely to get a bid her ein sports cars
>>
>>7224952
A solution to this I think would be to make a thread that has several different surveys at the ready an lined up and ready for /o/.

Just expect to see no votes for any FWD, or American.

Highly suggesting ITR stays.
>>
>>7224957
I am lucky to get any traction in this pinned thread. If I start spam posting with a ton of surveys its just going to piss people off.

Just have to hope people jump in this thread and contribute
>>
>>7224955
Oh also have the crown vic in there as well, so we had 2 american cars make it in as alternates.

But I myself have to agree with the community on this. If you are looking to maximize your dollar in the 5K and under category, imports generally hand american cars their ass
>>
>>7224964
That's why I said 1 post with links to ALL the surveys, way less clutter, all the surveys could be taken at once with a full selection etc.
Although I'm sure some busriders are going to fuck things up
>>
>>7224968
I see what you are getting at.

And the truck and SUV categories are going to have TON of nominations I am sure, so getting surveys up for them will almost be mandatory
>>
>>7224977
I just don't want to see the RWD VS FWD zealotry ruin votes.

>predicting
Mustang, Silvia, and BMW for sports cars.
>>
>>7224985
Yeah, mustang is likely a lock

BMW and the 240SX already made it in under the coupes, and I tend to agree that it makes more sense to be their.

I don't know what BMW would fir the sports car category. You can't find a Z3 or a Z4 for under 5K
>>
>>7224991
What about Mk3 supra?
>>
File: 1354819245334.jpg-(194 KB, 576x410, nissan_pulsar_nx_se_sport(...).jpg)
194 KB
194 KB JPG
>>7224991
Older M3, 325IX etc.
Didn't see the last updated pic, but hey, things can still be moved around.

Sport Coupes should be actually sporty I think though: RX-7 etc. So maybe a no go on non performance cars with no sports trim.

Still trying to make my list, though it's slightly different: Economyshitperformance boxes 80-99 edition, with 1-5k$ tiers and FWD/RWD/AWD/Rice collumns.
Prepare anus for shitboxes.

>Datpulsasporttbak
>>
>>7224999
cant get one under 5K in the states
>>
>>7225003
older M3 still goes for well over 10 Grand around here.

Rx-7 isn't really what I would call a "safe" car for someone who is coming on /o/ looking for car advice.
>>
>>7225009
Ah yes quite.
Just got off work so yea.
Fuck the BMW and Mercs then.
>>
>>7225015
the 190E isn't a bad choice. Actually found a few of them for under 5K near me.

Just don't know how much traction it would get
>>
>>7225018
Not much I think, even if it is a good car (Friend has one, really want to snag it when she's done). Helped do the rear suspension, pull a few dents and respray.

Boggles me when people say German cars are overly complicated.

Never really priced them, are they still up there?
>>
>>7225031
I know the mustang will get traction. I know the Miata will get traction.

So I really think it will just be a mtter of what snags the 3rd spot
>>
>>7225034
I'd think Nissan Z, but it's cramped as fuck so maybe not good for a newbie.

Going out for a drive, maybe that will spring some cars to mind.
>>
>>7224955

That one poster was me... lulz
>>
So guys, gotta peace out for a bit, will be back later tonight. Lets get some more sports car nominations out there.

If it looks like we are going to have enough cars, might consider adding in a roadster category

let me know what you guys think. will catch up later
>>
>>7223565
Celica seems a lot better. Driven both and i can attest to the celcias superiority
>>
Bit late to the party here (and how the hell did you get a sticky?)
But there is one massive flaw in ever having a sticky like you're suggesting.
The car people will buy/need depends VASTLY on their situation and their opinions, for example how much they can afford, what they need the car for, what cars they like the looks and feel of, etc.
Also things like "better interior" are just an opinion of ONE person.
Also the "tonnes of options as standard" cracked me up. They aren't options if they're standard, genius.
>>
>2012
>thinking creating a sticky will somehow reduce the number of "wat kar iz gud" threads
You're cute, newfags.

Also
>>7223952
>"The Sedan"
>Honda Accord Coupe
How do you expect people to trust a sticky that contains such bullshit.
>>
Why isn't there a sticky threatening bans for fucking retards starting auto vs. manual threads?
>>
Going by experience, i had a 1996 cadillac sedan deville and it was a GREAT first car. Roomy, safe, and had that fucking awesome 4.8 northstar.

other good suggestions: (keep in mind that this is cheap to buy, not cheap to repair cars)

Honda Del Sol
240 and 300 nissan
Ford Probe GT
Mitsubishi 3000gt base or SL (strongly recommend prior to 1995)
Toyota mr2
AWD Eagle Talon
Eclipse GSX (regular models are shit)
Mazda Miata (if you can find it, the M edition)

Im picking up a 3000gt monday for about $3000, and if they are in good shape I highly suggest it to get the sports car syndrome out of your system without breaking the bank on insurance (4 seats, security system, 4 wheel ABS, etc)
>>
>>7225201
because we need to educate everyone that manual is in all respects better than automatic.
>>
>>7218965
I disagree because the Legacy GT is AWD, has a great N/A engine, and will run as long as any Civic or Corolla.

drove my friends '01 and I loved it. shifted smooth as butter.
>>
>>7225205
the northstar is 4.6L
>>
>>7225207
i agree only in the sense that it makes you a better drive. if you lived in chicago or another major city, id kill myself if i had a manual.

IMO you should start with a manual to get the understanding of shift points and RPM, and then graduate to an automatic so you understand whats happening when you just floor it.
>>
>>7225220
excuse me. this is true.

either way, 275 break HP is nothing to sneeze at.
>>
>>7225223
I live in Cambridge, UK. It's kind of a city...
>>
>>7225236
if theres 30 stop lights within 5 miles of you, id advise against the manual.
>>
>>7225250
It is a popular, famous city in the UK. There are hundreds of traffic lights withing 5 miles.
You just suck at driving a manual if you can't stop and start.
>>
>>7225004
Uh yeah you can. I got one with 120k miles in really nice condition for 4500
>>
>>7225272
you are extremely butthurt. my only implication is that sitting and popping from 1st to 2nd to neutral 50 times in 10 miles is a pain in the ass, not that is has some kind of advantage.

mfw i drive a manual and you are sitting here trying to talk down to me.

mfw its faggots like you that ruin this board.

congrats, you can move a peddle with your foot and shake a stick around. you are driving master.
>>
>>7225272
also, considering this is a thread about first time cars, I would certainly expect an in-experienced driver to "suck" at driving anything, including a stick.

mfw people in this sticky will sit here and look at how fucking stupid your post was.

mfw eternal faggotry
>>
>>7225300
You're driving wrong if you're doing this, you should alter your driving style when you drive in a city. Sit in 1st with the clutch down for 2 seconds if the light are going to soon change, it isn't exactly going to hurt. From your post I seriously doubt you drive a manual in a city, else you'd know how to do it.
And of course. I forgot I should spend an extra £1000 on a car, and get £500 less when I resell it, just so I can save pressing a pedal down a few more times and moving my hand.
>2012
>Paying extra to be even more lazy
ishygydiggity
>>
>>7225300
>>7225311
And um, google mfw and save yourself the embarassment...
>>
Where's Overboard at? Jalponik is using one of your posts. Article is called "4chan gives good car buying advice" or something. Hopefully you see this, Albertafriend.
>>
>>7225205
Any money you save on insurance when purchasing a 3000GT will be completely negated by the money you spend on maintenance and parts.

Not hating 3si's at all, owned one myself, but it's really not a good car to get rid of the sports car syndrome, especially if it's the FWD N/A V6.
>>
>>7225343
>>7225346
>sit in your car in gear with the clutch down
>not destroying your hydro. clutch

i think you should be the one worried about saving face m8

inb4 your clutch in your fucking fiat or whatever the 95% of your country drives goes out tomorrow.

>doesnt know the difference between convenience and laziness

GG
>>
>>7225395
to be fair, that is going to apply to at least half the cars in the thread. sure, the 60 120 and 180k service updates are about $800, but finding parts for something like a del sol, a 300zx, a mr2, or anything outside of a civic or camry will be expensive, as they're just harder to find parts for.

i just hit a deer in my del sol, and even though the car was completely mechanically sound, i was quoted $3600 for a new hood, quarter panel, and door.

the car cost me $2300

so take any sportier 90s car with a grain of salt.

tl;dr
take car of your car and it will take car of your wallet.
>>
>>7225395
also, i live in the midwest where snow fucks over everything, so owning any RWD year round is un-wise to say the least.
>>
>>7225421
300zx isn't "bad" for parts. Pricewise they compare to the typical its just everything for it has to be shipped and that's where its a pain in the ass. Insurance I only pay $190 for my 90 n/a and my 91 tt together and im only 19 so its not bad.
>>
>>7225468
yeah but shipping is like 85% of the cost for all cars. that doesnt remove it from being expensive as fuck.

granted finding/pulling parts is a much cheaper alt., but thats a crapshoot in all locations as to what may be around. for example, no del sols really here in iowa to pull parts from, but theres fucking rx7's and 300zx's in every other lot.
>>
>>7225298

Find me one on craigslist in good condition for less than 5k.
>>
>>7224999

http://speedhero.wordpress.com/2010/09/06/10-reason-mk3-supras-are-garbage/
>>
>>7225403
>thinks 95% of my country drives fiats.
Try BMWs, Mercedes, Hondas, Land/Range Rovers, Toyota, Fords...
Oh and I buy new and have never kept a car more than 3 years. If the clutch doesn't go in the first 3 years it ain't my problem.
If the clutch does go in the first 3 years, my 5 year warranty will cover it.
Win-Win, Winning here, Winning there, etc...
>>
>>7225570
I have more respect for someone who bought a camaro in 1969 and treasured it all his life than a fucking snobby prick who gets every new mercedes and sells it after a few years

also,
>implying that attempt at "showing off' changes anyones mind about you being a fucking idiot.

your idea of a manual car is probably with paddle shifts lel

lose, losing, lose lose-lose, loserrrrr
>>
>>7225570
>>7225585
Ladies, please take this somewhere else. Don't shit up this thread
>>
>>7224446
>mfw tripfaggots are getting this inbred
>domestic
>>
I think there should be a section for entry level RWD cars too, since /o/ secretly loves drifting/hooning/sliding on the cheap.

Mustang, old Volvos, and.. whatever EU/AUS use.

Mustang
>>
>>7225600
I don't think that means what you think it means
>>
>>7225592
This thread is shit already.
The proposed sticky's shit and unnecessary and wrong.
>>
I still think that the sticky should be about giving people general instructions and ideas rather than examples of cars to buy. Now those examples will have to be updated frequently since cars and prices change and also vary a lot depending where you live. So maybe we should just tell people where to look information and how to choose a car for themselves for their own purposes instead of giving them a simple list and tell them to choose from that.
>>
>>7225633

not saying your wrong, but people that come here looking for advice aren't always the sort of people that want to read about how to look for a car.

While i agree that we should have a general "what to look for in a car" we should also have a simple chart of cars that someone can look at at a glance and know what sort of car they'd want to buy to suit their needs. a TL;DR version for the peasants, if you will.
>>
>>7225652

People who come here and announce "Find me a car" and don't show any interest in cars or to do any work themselves should be kindly told to gtfo.
>>
>>7225671
inside every car idiot is a mechanic just waiting to burst out
>>
>>7225711

And we help them coming out by giving them a list of cars to pick or by giving them general instructions and ideas how get to the goals themselves? Right...
>>
include the pros and cons of Auto vs Manuel for the newbies. might be helpful.
>>
Any information about thirdgens?
I screencapped a few threads a long time ago, but there's very little helpful information
http://i.imgur.com/B6L8s.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Jgq31.jpg
>>
>>7225728
>a long time ago
>July
lel
>>
>>7225735
Given that he's only 12 and what is this, that's like half his life ago...
>>
>>7225728
Stock Turdgens go from absolute shite (2.8 V6, Iron Duke 4cyl lawlz) to semi acceptable (305) to decent (350) to fuckawesome (3.8 tarbo Trans Am which is incredibly rare). Early 80s V8's have the computer Quadrajet which is sorta okay when in tune but if anything goes wrong with a computer Quadrajet it'll never run right again.
>>
>>7219025
You might rename the Vauxhall Corsa, it has been sold as Opel Corsa anywhere exept from Britain.
>>
>>7219032
>JUST BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS SHINY DOESN'T MEAN IT RUNS WELL
This needs some addition: if it is an elderly car, a shiny enginebay might be a bad sign. Cleaning the enginebay removes signs of oil-spills, which you should be interested in. Some people just wash it to make it look better though.
However: THE DIRTYER THE BETTER totally applys under the hood -->Check for leaks.

Also smell the oil. If it smells like fuel, the car mainly ran short distances.
>>
>>7225109
This, buying a car isn't like getting a pair of headphones or a computer. The region you live in alone can greatly affect what you're buying.

As it is the "buy a civic" is honestly the best answer in my opinion, since most people who are gonna ask 4chan for all of their research probably don't care enough to really want or take care of anything more, and if they do it will push them towards actually doing some research on their own, which is always a better idea.
>>
>>7224892
porsche 924/928/944
mazda rx-7/8
mazda miata
fiat x1/9
toyota mr2
toyota supra
mitsubishi GTO
MG MGB
BMW 8 series
TVR tasmin
pontiac firebird

In no particular order. Some of them are sports tourers rather than "sports cars"
>>
File: 1354834001589.jpg-(42 KB, 560x560, 384194_476149115762569_16(...).jpg)
42 KB
42 KB JPG
im older than the internet and txt msgs so i know stuff about buying cars...

>if you have cash at a dealership you can have wiggle room on price.
>any car without service records walk away. owner could have won burnouts with the car and engine and its got the engine knocks.
>any car thats cheap, normally its done either bulk miles or been thrashed. the only excption is deceseaced estate sales.
>speaking of which argood places sometimes to pick up a bargain, along with ex govt auctions as service vechicles are maintaned while they are being used by the govt.
>dont be scared to buy a hease. its just a taxi for dead people. low miles, and dont get thrashed because dead guy aint gonna get any deader...
> if you know your way round a engine your best tool to chek used cars is a torch, use it to check frame and behind wheel arches for bent frames and welding of dodgy repairs...
> if you see a car you realy like ask owner if you can get it indipentantly mechanically inspected at your cost. if owner says no, its fucked or stolen or ownership issue (eg divorce settlement)
and save your money for a better car..
> if you have a car in mind that you like go to the owners forums and check out there problem areas before you buy it and so you know how bad the car and where it gets (eg 90s honda accords bad for rust in boot)
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
shut up and buy a civic
>>
>>7224406
>>7224406

the mileage doesn't make sense
does it mean you buy less than that mileage or does it mean it will break down if its over the mileage
>>
>Compact truck
Ranger
>Midsize truck
Tacoma or Hilux
>Fullsize truck
F150
>HD truck
Superduty with Cummins swap for diesel and Superduty for gasser
>>
"Anonymous 12/06/12(Thu)19:08 No.7226534
OP Here thanks for all the tips guys, just grabbed a 5 book service manual set that was used on ebay for 8 bucks used, all intact. Also grabbed a haynes manual cause why not."

People seem to be pretty satisfied when you tell them to buy repair or shop manuals. I think that part should at least be in the sticky info.
>>
>>7225527
One piece of trim missing

http://columbus.craigslist.org/cto/3401725230.html

and so mine doesn't count?
>>
>>7225527
http://winnipeg.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles-cars-trucks-1986-Toyota-Supra-GTS-W0QQAdIdZ432317276
>>
If this list is finalized without a Foxbody Mustang on it, you've made a mistake.

If you're looking for a first car/budget car then you need something that's going to be cheap to own. Remember that cheap to own doesn't just refer to the initial purchase price. Mustangs are one of the most reliable (if not the most reliable) coupes you can buy and even if something does break, the parts are incredibly easy to find. Couple that with what is possibly the largest aftermarket support of any vehicle and you're looking at endless options for parts and customization on top of the car already being objectively better than most other coupes for the same price.

The only downsides are they're sort of ugly (subjective), they rust a lot, interior sucks and handing is sloppy, although the handling can be fixed through aftermarket. The car has almost no common reliability issues so ownership will be mostly smooth sailing.
>>
Most new drivers should get manual and some cheap shitbox.

>they will learn to drive a manual
>they will fuck the car up at some point

Later when knowledge increases move on to better things. Worked with me.
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
Warn drivers not to get a shit box as their new car. They have no safety features and are more likely to die in a car crash since they are inexperienced and have no safety features.

Also recommend buying a car over made 2000+, new laws in 2000 has made some safety features standard in new cars.

And make it say you need to buy a large car, not some faggy civic hatch back. You are statistically safer in a large car made post 2000, than a small car.
>>
File: 1354845674817.jpg-(29 KB, 540x270, 1354691391174.jpg)
29 KB
29 KB JPG
>>7219091
What kind of pleb doesn't include glorious masterrace 318ti in this category
>>
>>7227135
>BMW
>cheap econobox
>idontthinksotim.jpg
>>
>>7227140
Have you owned one? No, i can rev it to the moon all day and still get 10l/100km, maintenence is cheap.
Everybody just see's bmw and responds with oh its a old luxo euro, it must be super expensive.
>>
fuck spic cars lik the spicivic and bmws are expensive


go buy a nice american car like a cadillac or a chevy or a ford etc
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
postin in le sticky xDDD
>>
This is probably the best list for normalfags. Also "congrats" on making onto Jalopnikker site.
>>
>>7227032
>Warn drivers not to get a shit box as their new car.
Confirmed for troll post.
>>
>>7227332
Would you rather there be 20 threads a day asking the same question or have a single post sticky with an image?
>>
>>7227369
>thinking a car with no safety features for a driver with no experience is good.

No wonder all the people driving old cars die first.
>>
>>7227426
>thinking a car with no safety features for a driver with no experience is good.
I'm not saying they should get a FAST shitty car, I'm saying they should get a SLOW shitty car. I don't know if I speak for all of /o/ but that's how I learned to work on cars.

>No wonder all the people driving old cars die first.
[citation needed]
>>
>>7227444
>I'm not saying they should get a FAST shitty car, I'm saying they should get a SLOW shitty car
THIS
It'd take effort to kill yourself hooning any non-sporty car from the '90s. They literally do not have the power required to drive like an asshole (and succeed in doing so)
>>
>>7227525
>>7227444
I'm saying getting a car with safety features is better for a new driver than getting a car without safety features.

Can you please explain why getting a 1993 car is better than getting a 2006 car?
>>
>>7227617

>cheaper
>more reliable, sometimes
>>
>>7227525
Univerisity of Western Australia would like to have a word with you.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:7CICFlKxt6EJ:ors.wa.gov.au/Documents/Novice/novicedri
vers-report-vehicleperformance.aspx+&hl=en&gl=au&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj8FIs5uxxL4nh_UF
fYBj5VIiuiuVX7Qne5peHUUHiOuCP_YVs_hULI55gzXf8YKb2xZ54SGfU7eNgfxBXw7S_XIgw2flvrULmPi9MWbkXcncsFHb3dIY
Ipn3FExmmk1_kbBWcj&sig=AHIEtbTQB7M08EePM-PVUmko-hAw9VujfQ
>>
File: 1354859975244.jpg-(701 KB, 1280x960, 2010-12-31_13-58-11_642.jpg)
701 KB
701 KB JPG
The sticky should just display "shut the fuck up, buy a civic", nothing more.
>>
>>7228102
this.
>>
>inb5 jalopnik invasion of brony faggots sucking off Mike Spaghetioos Spinelli and those other cock gobbling neck beards
>Prepare for reddit invasion and faggots
>>
File: 1354867759079.jpg-(1.52 MB, 2388x1784, o cars.jpg)
1.52 MB
1.52 MB JPG
make this part of sticky
>>
>BMW 8 series in all these guides.

No, just no.
>>
File: 1354870228780.jpg-(2.2 MB, 2388x2779, oficial giode 1.6.jpg)
2.2 MB
2.2 MB JPG
ok better
>>
>>7228864
Why are:
>hard to find an automatic
and
>maunal will be far more common
in the cons section of the Golf TDI and Toyota Celica?
>>
>>7228839
Why?
Its a nice car.
It can be expensive to own (especially the v12) but so are most nice cars.
>>
I hate the fucking stickys, fuck off the bike one too.

Do you think any cunt reads it? Then why do we still have 10+ threads a day asking "wut bike is gud?"

Its useless.

How about a sticky to do up your seat belt? and another stick to pump up your tires? and another sticky for dildo shifters? Its ridiculous.
>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uMvgnN_XoE

I suggest fullscreen, HD, and volume
>>
miata

/thread
>>
Integra

or any 90s Honda
>>
E36 if you don't mind the maintenance.
>>
Morning guys. Sorry I didn't get a chance to get back on last night. Got a fucking Migraine and it knocked my ass down for the count.

I am catching up reading through the posts, thanks to everyone in advance for the feedback/ideas/suggestions.

Will try and get some more work done on the sports car section this morning, and get a rough draft up for people to look at.
>>
What is this shit? Leave and never come back.
>>
>>7229080

i apologize for the.. autism? i suppose? in this thread.

/o/ is a friendly, helpful board, if crotchety when pressed. I don't know where all this ill-will is coming from, or why, but don't mind it, just keep working on the sticky. Bit rough looking sofar, but in time it'll look good.

Keep it up everyone.
>>
>>7224406
E36 3 series

common problems:

CHASSIS WEAK SPOTS

Rear shock mounts destroying rear shock towers
Weak rear subframe mounts destroying sheet metal

BMW WILL ALWAYS BE EXPENSIVE
>>
>>7229100
thanks for the support good sir

>>7229114
My brain hasn;t got going yet this moring, but I was actually just revising the BMW section. How would you put the chassis weak spot in non car person terms, I am drawing a blank
>>
>>7229119
>
Chassis weak points:

The E36 chassis was the first 3 series chassis that was CAD designed, as opposed to good old fashioned German engineering, and consequently it does have some weak points that made it into production cars.

"Chassis weak points? What do you mean?"

I mean the sheet metal that makes up the car sucks and has been known to fail. Some areas are more prone to failure than others.

"The metal that makes up the car *fails"?!? It's a BMW. I thought they were good cars!"

They are good cars. But this is the point we're trying to make with this entire catalog of information...the car can break, will break, and can be expensive to own if you don't know what you're doing. The car can be expensive to own even if you *do* know what you're doing. You're here to school yourself on the E36 before you buy the car. Emptying out your savings account to buy the E36 on Autotrader that was a great deal won't do you any good if afterwords you find out there are hairline cracks in the RTAB pocket.

"What's an RTAB pocket?"

Exactly...keep reading.


Source - M3forums

applies to any E36

tl:dr this is enthusiasts car not for people on a budget
still... it's a very good automobile
>>
File: 1354883865580.jpg-(53 KB, 640x480, RSM FAIL.jpg)
53 KB
53 KB JPG
>>7229121
it looks like this
>>
>>7229121
>>7229125
What year models does this apply to? Or is it just all older ones in general?

Will draft a revision to the cons to reflect this is more an enthusiasts car than a budget car, is still a great car, but easy to get in over your head with.

Will amend cons to include chassis weak points

thoughts?
>>
>>7229134
BMW 3 series 1991-1999 widely known as E36

Basically averyone buying this car should read this and other threads on specialized forum

http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/showthread.php?t=533803

this is about M3 but 90% applies to other models

you should add to the cons that PERSON BUYING THIS CAR SHOULD REALLY KNOW HIS SHIT

I had this car as my first one. In Europe (Poland) these are really really cheap, some around 1500-2000 euro BUT most are beat to shit. BMW that is not in perfect condition suspension-wise and engine wise is really shitty car to drive. It's just very frustrating to drive it and see ho brilliant it could be if only you could spend A LOT of money on refreshing it.

Looking for a Civic now, but I still want to own a good E36 some day.
>>
File: 1354887182862.png-(166 KB, 1093x1426, RDv0.5.1.png)
166 KB
166 KB PNG
Ok guys, here is rough draft v0.5.1

Changelog:

-Added version numbers to each section so people can keep track of how far along the progress is with each group

-Fixed my "hurr durr" moment of having the Camry coupe and Accord couple being listed in the wrong section

-Minor Revisions to the "pros", "cons" & "Alternates and Honorable Mentions" sections of the Econoboxes, Sedans, and the Celica

-Major versions to the 3 series BMW section under coupes

-Changed text of "years and mileage" row to reflect the miles indicated are the maximum recommended miles the car should have at time of purchase

-Added rough draft v0.1 of sports car section


As always, thoughts, comments, insights, and opinions are welcome guys.
>>
>>7229181
you should include rust warnings for cars like old hondas, toyotas and the 240sx
>>
>>7229181
I really don't think 3 is enough for each category
>>
>>7229199
good call, completely slipped my mind

>>7229206
Its why I added in the alternates and honorable mentions. Its easy to say ,"well lets list 4", then "ah we could do 5" and then things spiral out of control with adding in more and more cars. 3 is a nice solid place to draw a line.

Plus you have to remember, this is basically Cliff Notes for cars, not the full novel. This is to offer non car people the highlights, and a jumping off point so that discussions can start from a more meaningful place rather than having to go through the same old thing every time someone asks "what car is good"

Based on feedback, I am planning to include a list of 10-15 "good" cars at the end of the sticky for people to consider that don't fit neatly into any one of the categories.
>>
>>7229206
Agreed. Some could use 5
>>
>>7229218
>>7229218
OK I will bite, which categories? and what cars would you recommend? I might try and rework the alternates and honorable mentions to be a little more descriptive if people really think some categories need more than 3
>>
File: 1354896180994.jpg-(79 KB, 800x475, 800px-1st_Ford_Taurus_SHO(...).jpg)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>>7229221
For the Sedan category you could add the '89-'95 Ford Taurus SHO. Pretty quick cars, even for today's standards. They just need a good amount of maintenance to keep them running good.

I'm also thinking Mazda 6. They are pretty good sedans
>>
>>7229314
the maintenance bit is what makes me hesitant to include it a car guide fro non car people.

Also, how common are the SHO's? I think I have maybe seen 2-3 in my lifetime?
>>
>>7229221
RX7 for the sports car
>>
>>7229330
maintenance issues? Is it reliable enough for a non-car person?
>>
>>7229342
Yes, if it has been maintained/service history they are fine. Its only if they're modified, heavily mistreated or neglected
>>
>>7229368
easily found at the 5K or under price point?
>>
>>7229374
lolnope.
>>
>>7229380
thats what I thought. Been looking and havent found one yet
>>
>>7229314
don;t think the mazda 6 is going to fly either. You can barely find them at the 5-6K price point from what I can see
>>
Under 5,000 for the sedan?
GM C-body, H-body, B-body, W-Platform

Cheap and holds together well. Also 3800 engines everywhere.
>>
>Eco
Civic
Corolla
Escort
>Sedan
Legacy
Camry
Crown Vic
>Coupe
Celica
Accord
W-Body (GM)
>Sports
Foxbodies
F-bodies
Miata

How it should look:
>Eco
Civic
Sentra
Tercel
>Sedan
Civic/Accord
Sentra/Altima/Maxima
Corolla/Camry/Tercel/Avalon
>Coupe
Civic/Accord
Sentra
Tercel/Celica
>Sports
Miata
Mustang
Camaro

Remember this is for new people, so they need:
Easy to work on
Reliable
Large supply of knowledge
Large supply of parts.
>>
>>7229181

under 350k miles on some of these?

Believe me, I know mileage is a weird indication of health. Some cars with 300k run better than those with 130k.

But for an everyday car purchase where you're probably not going to go through it with a fine tooth comb like I would then I wouldn't venture far beyond 200k.
>>
>>7229536

I might add that is for a gasoline engine. Diesels are another story, most consider 200k a breaking in point
>>
>>7229536
>>7229539
Hmm good point. might be better to switch the mileage to a range with a disclaimer on condition
>>
Also, I am going to need some help from the Mustang guys of /o/. Its gotten more than its fair share of nominations, so it has made it onto the v0.1 chart of sports cars, but I am not hugely knowledgeable bout them.

What are the good years/years you can find for under 5K. Pros and cons in everyday life. Common issues/trouble spots. Any and information is appreciated.
>>
>>7229695
>under 5k
You might be able to get a '96-'98 Cobra for that, but it'll have some miles on it.

You can also get a '99-'04 GT for that, but those are pretty shit.
>>
>>7229695
Mustang II, could probably find for cheap. Will most likely need large amounts of work. Pretty much suck ass.

Foxbody is cheap/lightweight, just watch out for rust, engines weren't super powerful but powerful enough. Tons of aftermaket. Best bet for a budget. Avoid convertibles.

SN95, basically a modified Foxbody, looks gay, best with the 5.0 ohv engine. 4.6's were meh. Watch for rust.

SN95 'New Edge', pretty much just a better looking SN95. Some improvements for the car in all areas. Terminators arent going to be $5000 though.
>>
File: 1354912205453.jpg-(172 KB, 657x650, 1354850485336.jpg)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
>>7229181
>3000gt
>solid performance
>timing belt

shit nigga, this shows that you know nothing regarding cars....probably taking all your info from need for speed games or some shit
>>
>>7229837
No, i am taking it from input here. If you disagree, tell me why, provide some references, and offer an alternate suggestion.
>>
>>7229181
I don't think the 3000GT or any other kind of DSM should be up there...
>>
>>7230146
Then tell me why not, offer me a suggestion as replacement, and why it is better good sir. I would like to get some discussion going about it
>>
File: 1354922349304.png-(69 KB, 500x500, 1301103534741.png)
69 KB
69 KB PNG
this isn't the first time someone has tried this, and you know what?
>IT DIDN'T FUCKING WORK
why?
because people disregard stickies and still ask
even if you direct them they won't stop
so in summation
>this is fucking retarded
>>
File: 1354922888588.png-(1.89 MB, 1140x1140, 1323846620672.png)
1.89 MB
1.89 MB PNG
>reposting to bypass reddit bullshit post
this isn't the first time someone has tried this, and you know what?
>IT DIDN'T FUCKING WORK
why?
because people disregard stickies and still ask
even if you direct them they won't stop
so in summation
>this is fucking retarded
>>
>>7229727
>>7229726
Thanks for these posts guys. Would still like to see more feedback from people in the know on mustangs as to what years are good and can be found for 5K or under.
>>
File: 1354923988443.jpg-(107 KB, 800x584, idk.jpg)
107 KB
107 KB JPG
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lANy5TLRyl8&feature=plcp
>>
File: 1354924229746.jpg-(245 KB, 3750x3750, 1318563907432.jpg)
245 KB
245 KB JPG
>reposting to bypass another bullshit post this isn't the first time someone has tried this, and you know what?
>IT DIDN'T FUCKING WORK
why?
because people disregard stickies and still ask
even if you direct them they won't stop
so in summation
>this is fucking retarded
>>
>>7230440
ok then man, you think its a stupid idea. You don't have to contribute, but myself and the people who want to are going to continue working on it
>>
>>7230447
I'm still going to say its a stupid idea repeatedly, because it is
People will come visit /o/ and make posts like they always do, because they want another person's opinion
the sticky won't do jack shit
also
>implying "wat car is gud" don't make up 30% of threads on the extremely slow moving /o/ anyway
in short
>this is a retarded idea
>>
File: 1354925449828.png-(166 KB, 1092x1353, RDv0.6.2.png)
166 KB
166 KB PNG
OK, here we go, rough draft v0.6.2

Changelog(not a lot this time):

-Switched mileage ceiling to a range rather than fixed mileage

-received push back on 3000GT, requesting nominations for third slot of sports car category/further feedback on if 3000GT should stay or go

-tentative model years for the Mustang added, still need more feedback on this

As always, feedback, opinions, thoughts are welcome and encouraged
>>
>>7230447
He's right though, what about when somone wants to know wat 4x4 is gud for ____ area of ___ state
>>
This is stupid. The car that's right for somebody depends on what they're looking for, it isn't always going to be one of 12 seemingly randomly picked cars. Seriously where the fuck did you get the information for this list from? It makes absolutely no sense.
>>
File: 1354926630806.gif-(26 KB, 350x350, 4chansealofepicfailure.gif)
26 KB
26 KB GIF
>>7230510
please understand that that other list with the car/price range is the most "accurate" list you'll get here.

we don't give a fuck about DDs for the most part, and when asked for a DD...well the best choice is a fuking CIVIC or some type of honda, because they can be found in all price ranges and all types of car types (coup, sedan, hatch, etc), and they can be found all over the world for the most part.

also you have terrible car choices in there due to the product of trolling
>>
>>7230583
Again, what choices, for what reason?

>>7230582
Yes, I get the car depends on what they are looking for, thats why we are striving to do about 10 different categories, the ones in the draft are just the ones that have been done so far
>>
>>7230583
I would never drive a Civic. You're wrong; get a life you little shit.
>>
>>7230602
More categories isn't going to help anything, because your opinion might not be right for me. The reason people come here to ask what car is good is to get OPINIONS from other people on what car is best for them, then they can reply and be more specific about what they want and get specific information. They won't get that from a damn chart wasting space at the top of a page that 90% of the people here don't need to look at.

I get that the threads turn into trolling and arguing, but so does every thread on /o/. Amongst that shit there's sometimes some pretty good info though, especially on this stuff.
>>
>>7230630
And not everyone wants to come on a board that's foreign to them and wade through the trolling to get an opinion on something they don't know much about.

That's why /g/, /fit/, and several other boards have all done sticky's about common topics. You honestly think, even if it didn't go to the top of the page, that having a good reference chart on cheap cars/good first cars would be bad?

People could actually look it over, and ask intelligent questions, rather than stumble around in the dark and deal with people trolling the shit out of them. I just don't understand how so many people in this board could see this as a bad thing
>>
>>7230645
Do you seriously not understand that all the suggestions for cars in this list is just a giant troll? You have a fucking mustang compared with a Miata, and an e36 with a Celica. The price differences alone in these categories is retarded enough but the actual car choices are just bonkers for any sort of valid comparison. And I think the pros/cons ridiculousness speaks for itself in most of them.

I don't care if this becomes something posted from time to time, but making this thing a sticky would just be stupid and make this board look even dumber to anybody who actually knows about cars.
>>
>>7230645
well said

>>7230678
Which ones do you think are trolls? What pros/cons do do you think are ridiculous? What choices are bonkers?

And I think you think this chart is something it isn't. They aren't being compared to one another, it isn't a "what car is better" chart, its a "good cheap cars under 5K/good first cars" chart. There is no "price difference" because we are looking to have all the cars on the chart be ones you can buy for 5K or under.
>>
About coming to foreign boards...

I don't write good english and some people know that I'm from Finland but I don't like when other finnish people start talking finnish with me. We are on American board and I think all convos should be had in english since everybody who comes here know english or otherwise they wouldn't be here in the first place. I know people who speak swedish and its the second language here but I think its fucking rude to have convos in swedish if majority of people are finnish and the swedish talking people know finnish.

So please people talk english.
>>
>>7230793
あなたは何について話している?
>>
>>7230831

Thanks.
>>
>>7230510
Your chart is a nice idea but I think 3 cars per category is simply not enough to cover all bases. I'm not sure how many would be enough however, maybe 6?
>>
>>7230865
a lot of people have put forth this idea, and I am willing to adapt the alternates section to list more cars, but I think it has to be possible to pick a top 3

Which sections would you expand, and what cars would you suggest?
>>
>>7230875

I have to say this is a nobel idea and nice to see someone ready to contribute so much to this board. Well done.
>>
>>7230922
Thank you sir

I just wish people would give more meaningful feedback than "than you need more cars" or "i think this part sucks"
>>
>>7230875
>>7230933
I don't have the patience to give a lot of meaningful feedback, however you can definitely give a top 3 while also having another 3 to add on top of all your categories. It's just that the more cars you suggest, the larger the perspective will be for what cars people should be looking for.

Unfortunately I can't exactly suggest any good cars to you because I'm from Australia so I don't know what your car market is like at all.
>>
>>7230975

You can still contribute for a potential AUS market version
>>
so it seems like there is a ton of confusion surrounding what the finished product is going to look like, so I am going to draft out what I anticipate this chart to look like when done, and just leave what I can't make a wild guess at blank.

Just hang with me, and I think once people see what the light at the end of the tunner looks like we can get more discussion. people can give feed back on what they know, instead of us having to struggle though each section at a time.
>>
>>7231003
once it is brought up I will.
>>
Ok, have a very very rough draft of the whole chart drawn out, will paste together and post forthwith
>>
File: 1354937739770.png-(288 KB, 2646x1758, RDv6.2.0.0.png)
288 KB
288 KB PNG
OK guys, here is a very rough draft of what I would like the sticky to look like when complete, so that people jumping in have a better idea of what it is we are trying to do

Things I maybe had some kind of vague idea about, I scratched in. Everything else I left blank.

I will open the floor to any suggestions to any category that people would like to contribute to.
>>
I don't like how the guy in charge of the sticky is a fucking class A level retard.
>>
File: 1354939153478.gif-(2.91 MB, 300x166, cars.gif)
2.91 MB
2.91 MB GIF
>>7231383
nou
>>
>>7231393
I wouldn't even mind getting called a retard if they would then offer any kind of constructive suggestion to making the chart better.
>>
>>7230793
Your English appears to be as good as or better than most people who's native language it is
>>
>>7230630
Although a chart like what is being suggested will be a good starting point, when it turns our newfag who wants to know wut car is good for under 5k keeps getting told mustang or civic when he has to take his 6 kids to school.
>>
>>7230933

Well this is 4chan after all and people are stupid generally. IRL and on /o/.
>>
>>7231458
True. If I don't get any more feedback in the next bit, I guess I am going to try and start tackling the empty categories as best I can, although I am fucking clueless when it comes to trucks and SUV's.
>>
fuck dis shit

/o/ wiki now. That way you can have multiple articles for different things such as

Top 10's (econobox, luxury sedan, entry sedan, truck, etc.)

How to's

Other misc. guides

user-based information and feed back on any car someone's made a page on with their own personal pro's and cons , etc.
>>
File: 1354941687172.gif-(2.92 MB, 300x166, cars4.gif)
2.92 MB
2.92 MB GIF
I'll throw in my vote for Toyota FJ60 as a cheap SUV or a 4.0 Cherokee.
>>
>>7231485
nice, so noted
>>
Honda Element for SUV
It's prices are close, as there's a few right above $5k in my area, but it's a terrific car

It's best feature is that you can just take a hose to the inside, as it's all covered in plastic/rubber

My buddy has one, and we go kayaking and camping a lot, and it's terrific. If there's sand and shit in his car, we just spray the inside with a hose

And dat Honda reliability
>>
>>7231471
Sounds good. and can incorporate the current bike sticky too
>>
>>7231498
thank you sir

>>7231471
I would be down for a wiki, would still like to get this infographic made up to either go with it or go in a front page sticky
>>
>>7231471
Yes, this. Get rid of all stickies and just use the wiki. If there absolutely HAS to be a sticky, it should just point to the wiki. Dickie.
>>
Ok guys, give me a hand, trying to start filling this out.

What are the thoughts on keeping the 3000GT as the 3rd sports car? Yes/no?

Wagon wise, I am thinking a volvo of some sorts, maybe an old Merc E class, thoughts? ideas for a third pick?

SUV we have the Element nominated, its a little on the high side of the price. Also have the Grande Cherokee up for nominate. thought?

Truck wise, I kinda have no idea. I never look at truck, the only one I have any experience with is a early 2000's Ford F-150. Need you guys to help me out here

For classy cars, I am thinking 190E, maybe 300E Merc? Maybe 300D? Waaay back in this thread I had some people throw out the lexus sedans for possibilities in this area. Thoughts?

As fast as your dollar can go and special snowflake I am drawing blanks, any ideas thrown on the table would be appreciated

Thanks in advance for any and all feedback. .
>>
>>7231383
second.

Like, you emailed moot, and for some fucking reason he actually listened to you? The sticky, if made at all, should have like four econoboxes on it. Making a wat car is gud thread with interesting perameters isnt that bad, but for everyone else, stfu buy a civic.
>>
>>7231714
and how does putting civic, accord, corolla, and camry in a box with pictures help anyone?
>>
>Ctrl+f Cressida
>0 results

What
What the fuck /o/
Why?
>>
Gonna rebump since this is where I am at:

Ok guys, give me a hand, trying to start filling this out.

What are the thoughts on keeping the 3000GT as the 3rd sports car? Yes/no?

Wagon wise, I am thinking a volvo of some sorts, maybe an old Merc E class, thoughts? ideas for a third pick?

SUV we have the Element nominated, its a little on the high side of the price. Also have the Grande Cherokee up for nominate. thought?

Truck wise, I kinda have no idea. I never look at truck, the only one I have any experience with is a early 2000's Ford F-150. Need you guys to help me out here

For classy cars, I am thinking 190E, maybe 300E Merc? Maybe 300D? Waaay back in this thread I had some people throw out the lexus sedans for possibilities in this area. Thoughts?

As fast as your dollar can go and special snowflake I am drawing blanks, any ideas thrown on the table would be appreciated

Thanks in advance for any and all feedback. .
>>
>>7231800
For trucks, you should mention late 90's Dodge IF you're looking for a manual tranny. Dodge autos are bad news bears, but they're otherwise good trucks. Damn reliable. I had one with 250k+ which I bagged and never maintained, which the first 2 owners also bagged and never maintained, and that thing was bulletproof. Also, I hope you've mentioned a Toyota with a 22RE.
>inb4topgear
I had one, it was great. Also has the added benefit for a new driver of being slow as shit. However they rust like motherfuckers.
>>
>>7231867
nice, thank you sir


Ok guys, for the sports car third slot, what are peoples feelings regarding the following:

Acura Integra GS-R
1985-'94 Chevrolet Camaro/Pontiac Firebird
1984-'96 Chevrolet Corvette
1997-2001 Honda Prelude
1990-'98 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS-T/GSX
1991-'95 Toyota MR2

thoughts?
>>
File: 1354953568741.png-(270 KB, 2177x1963, RDv0.6.2.1.png)
270 KB
270 KB PNG
OK guys, have hit a wall, am going to HAVE to get some more input to push things alone

Rough Draft v0.6.2.1

Changelog:

-3000GT switched out for Acura Integra after re-reading many of the older posts

-v0.1 of Wagons section added

-v0.1 of SUV section added

-v0.1 of Truck section added

In need of more feedback on the Sports Car, Wagon, SUV, and Truck sections.

As always, opinions, thoughts, feedback, and comments are welcome

-
>>
>>7231963
Add falcons and commodores as an australian section for large cars. There's a large population of australian users on this board.
>>
>>7231963
>OK guys, have hit a wall, am going to HAVE to get some more input to push things alone

Don't rush this. give it time, people will post their input when they can.
>>
>>7218817 (OP)
this whole thread is gay as fuck

you know most countries in the world dont even have the majority of the cars and if they do one is worth $500 in one country and $5000 in another

so unless you make a separate one for every country its pretty much fucking useless and even then its just a bunch of faggots opinions and the majority of them dont know shit
>>
>>7232317
>>7232433
/o/ is an AUSTRALIAN BOARD

yall cocksucking rednecks can suck a holden dick

ABBO ABBO ABBO
>>
>>7232433
OMG LEL U FUNNY MEN xD

USA USA USA NUMBRE #1
>>
>>7232317
>so unless you make a separate one for every country
I would think three would be sufficient.
One for the Americas, Australasia, and Europe.
>>
>Not reading this whole thread
>1651

The only problems I can foresee is that 5000 USD is, for example, a lot different than 5000 EUR and that all cars are different and have different common problems so a generic sticky for those points may not be quite 100% fool proof.
>>
>>7232842
I just read the whole thread.
I want to kill myself.
>>
>>7231963
>Wranger
>SUV
no
>Good diesel?
Cummins, but Dodge trucks suck. Swap a Cummins into a Ford, or stick to a 1st gen Ram.
>>
The Ford Bronco would be a good choice for a SUV. So would a classic Trailblazer or Suburban.
Ford Excursion if you really need a big SUV.
>>
>>7233087
>Answer to first question:
>Civic.
only if you want a shitbox
>>
File: 1354993583137.jpg-(9 KB, 256x192, derka!.jpg)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
I would love to participate. I have been in the autobody industry for 8 years, painting and light body work for 4 years and full time estimating for the last 4 years. Between that set of knowledge I can help you EASILY identify replaced panels, non OEM parts, indicators of frame or suspension damage, known shitty designs and known excellent designs that last forever mechanically and chassy wise.

I VOTE FOR BOTH STICKIES!!
>>
>>7232842
>5000 usd is different than 5000euros
this tripfag is a fucking genius
>>
>>7233506
>dont need
because people only buy cars to fulfil needs? right?
>>
Whats the image progress sofar?
>>
>>7233972

Also, when you do finish it, please make some footnote to not respond to obvious shitposters and report them instead.
>>
Test-icles
>>
File: 1355008667451.jpg-(25 KB, 600x450, 530905_528820917147640_12(...).jpg)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
i will pass on a few tips to help you look for your new runabout.

>if you have cash for car you can pay less at a dealer than if you have to book it up on contract...

> if you see a car you like, open the engine lid. and check the fliuds before you start the engine. colour can tell you alot about the car is running.
-engine used oil should be BLACK, white or any other colour could be blown head gasket.
-transmission (auto) oil should be RED. brown means havent changed the oil.
-power steer resviour colour should be RED same as auto.
-radiator water colour should be either RED, YELLOW OR GREEN, itf its rusty brown its scale that hasnt been backwashed and will need to be done or will pop holes in radiatior.
if its milky white or caramel its done a head gasket.
-differential oil should be BLACK and no metal shavings in the oil. means its done high miles / abuse and is on its way out.

when you start the car from cold, any smoke?-white and its not early in the morning is head gasket.
-blue and goes away. valve guides
-blue and keeps going. piston rings (walk away, unless buying for project)
-black smoke burning rich. and needs a good tune up.

>your best weapon in you car buying arsenal is a torch, use it to look behind wheel arches for dodgy welding and bent frames or rust.
>if you see a car you like and you are complete noob. ask if you can get it indipendantly mechanically inspected (at your cost) if they say no, car is ethier stolen or not theirs...
>>
Since I'm sure this question is asked everyday:

I have 8000 dollars for a car (including taxes), what should I buy? I'm so lost.
>>
>>7234197

ummm you're a fucking idiot who needs to give better details on inspecting fluids
>>
>>7231885
For the last sports car, I'd say go with an FC rx7. As the alternatives, you could have 240sx, mr2 and Integra.

For the SUV's, I nominate the Jeep GC, Chev Tahoe, and Nissan Pathfinder.

As far as trucks go, you can't beat a Manual Cummins, and then theres obviously the Ford Ranger. I think for a gas full size, the Silverado would make a good choice.
>>
>>7231885
For something classy, I have no fucking idea, class isn't typically cheap. Bang for your buck, just put Civic, Miata, and FC w/LS1 swap.

Special snowflake, have w210 Mercedes e55, e39 BMW 540i, and WS6.

Furthermore, I think you should add shit for expensive wat car iz gud threads, like luxury, grand tourer, supercar, and off roader's.
>>
>>7219059
1G Dodge/Plymouth Neon, but make sure it's the DOHC otherwise it'll have a hell of a time keeping it's headgasket in one piece.
>>
>>7234410
lol what?
sohc and dohc engines are the same 2.0 liter block assembly with different cyl heads and pistons, the dohc head is the same a a 2.4 dohc. the dohc gets domed pistons to comensate for the larger cc combustion chamber of the head, and has slightly lower compression than the sohc. you can put dohc pistons in an sohc engine to gain compression.
all 00+ neons (non srt-4) have the sohc engine with some minor changes in 03+ (moved location of crank sensor)
the head gasket problems always referenced were corrected with an mls (multi layer steel) head gasket. Head issues generally occur when the head warps from lack of coolant in the engine, the cars being cheap eccono boxes generally get handed to teens and women who abuse and neglect them.
>>
Is there a fun sporty American car for under 10k? I don't want japs crap or euroshit.
>>
>>7235421
preferably 4 doors.
>>
Civics are overpriced and carry a ricer tax.
>>
File: 1355027562039.jpg-(133 KB, 701x467, reargl3.jpg)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
>>7235421

1998-2001 Camaro/Firebird
SVT Focus
Neon Srt-4
Eagle Talon Tsi/Dodge Stealth
Mustang
>>
File: 1355027744155.jpg-(179 KB, 1024x704, 1310931351621.jpg)
179 KB
179 KB JPG
>>7235441

My bad, didn't see that.

Honestly, for that price point, and since you prefer a sedan the srt-4 is pretty much your best bet.

The Taurus SHO is another option.
>>
>>7235593
an eagle talon isn't really american lol,
>>
>>7231963
Wrangler? Get the fuck out of here. Like I said earlier, Suburban.
>>
File: 1355033727627.jpg-(38 KB, 300x315, 1354743804266.jpg)
38 KB
38 KB JPG
>>7235602

Why, because it uses a Japanese engine? The car was only made in America, just like the Eclipse.
>>
>>7235939
They don't all use a jap engines. Lots of them have shitty chrysler engines in them too.
>>
File: 1355035532065.jpg-(22 KB, 600x276, 291084194l1hz.jpg)
22 KB
22 KB JPG
>>7236037

True, I always forget about the 420a.
>>
Alright guys, just got a chance to look over the new posts.

Thanks for a lot of great feedback! I am going to look it all over, and I am going to try and do some work on the chart tonight, hopefully get SUV/Truck flushed out some more and get a new revision up for people to kick around today
>>
STICKYBUNS
>>
Gotta love Sunday morning

Finally read through ALL the feedback thus far and got a chance to research it all some more and flush out everyone's suggestions

Hope to have the next rough draft out in a couple hours with the Sports Car, Wagon, truck, and SUV sections completely flushed out so you guy scan start giving some feedback on it

stay tuned.
>>
>>7236789

keep up the good work
>>
File: 1355077201756.png-(391 KB, 2177x2083, RDv0.7.0.png)
391 KB
391 KB PNG
OK guys, here is rough draft v0.7.0

Got some MAJOR revisions/additions here, I am sure I will leave out a bunch of stuff, but here is my best attempt at telling you whats new

Changelog:

-Added in a intro at the top

-Tentatively moved Econoboxes out of "Beta" to v1.0, possible first draft of a "finished" section. Further refined pros, cons, and alternates to section

-Sedans and Coupes revised to v0.7:
Subaru swapped into tentative top potion in Sedans, Volvo moved to alternate
Subaru swapped into tentative top position in coupes, Nissan moved into alternates
Multiple tentative alternates added/edited into coupe category

-Sports Cars revised to v0.4
info for top 3 tentative choices further refined
multiple tentative alternates added

Wagons revised to v0.4
Fully expanded all tentative top choices
Added in multiple alternates to all choices

-Truck/SUV/Lux revised to v0.1.1
further flushed out tentative top choices
added in tentative alternate choices
Still need more feedback for this section, my knowledge on trucks is weak

As always, comments, feedback, thoughts, and contributions are welcome
>>
>>7237303

There is a serious problem in the fact that Volvo 240s or Crown Vics aren't on there anywhere. Both proven gud and cheap cars.
>>
>>7237317
they are, check again in the alternates and honorable mentions sections of sedans and wagons
>>
>>7237303
i would suggest listing prices for each car, or listing a website that can give you prices, such as kbb or edmunds
>>
>>7237338
I think I can reference people to KBB for a good starting price. The whole point is that these cars are good buys for 5K and under, the exact price is going to depend on condition, mileage, and model year.
>>
>>7237322

My bad. I apolgisex you. Maybe make the alternatives section a brighter color?
>>
>>7237342
good deal, will test some stuff out
>>
>>7237303
I think it should be added that, if the is a car(s) you really like, and you can afford it*, then you should buy it, no matter how bad/unreliable/slow/shit anyone on /o/ say it is. If you don't you will spend the next five years driving a reliable shitbox that won't die wondering what driving your dream car would be like.
Worst case scenario you realise what everyone on here said was true and you sell it in six months and lose a little $£€.

*By afford, I mean afford the fuel, servicing, insurance, etc, not just the initial purchase price.
>>
File: 1355079217030.png-(395 KB, 2177x2083, RDv0.7.1.png)
395 KB
395 KB PNG
OK guys, here is rough draft v0.7.1, changed colors/fonts around to hopefully make it easier to read

Got some MAJOR revisions/additions here, I am sure I will leave out a bunch of stuff, but here is my best attempt at telling you whats new

Changelog for v0.7.0 & 0.7.1:

-Tweaked colors and fonts to hopefully make it easier to read, welcome feedback on this

-Added in a intro at the top

-Tentatively moved Econoboxes out of "Beta" to v1.0, possible first draft of a "finished" section. Further refined pros, cons, and alternates to section

-Sedans and Coupes revised to v0.7:
Subaru swapped into tentative top potion in Sedans, Volvo moved to alternate
Subaru swapped into tentative top position in coupes, Nissan moved into alternates
Multiple tentative alternates added/edited into coupe category

-Sports Cars revised to v0.4
info for top 3 tentative choices further refined
multiple tentative alternates added

Wagons revised to v0.4
Fully expanded all tentative top choices
Added in multiple alternates to all choices

-Truck/SUV/Lux revised to v0.1.1
further flushed out tentative top choices
added in tentative alternate choices
Still need more feedback for this section, my knowledge on trucks is weak

As always, comments, feedback, thoughts, and contributions are welcome
>>
Ok guys, now this is all nearly done.

Here comes the all important question - When do i become mod?

I mean i haven't done this all for no reason, i'm a tripfag after all and being a tripfag is all about status. So mod me already so my life can have some value finally.
>>
>>7237426
>NICE ONE /B/RO

I believe everyone got over this much earlier in the thread. Hide and move on, loser.
>>
>>7237397
>>7237397
Typo on the general advice section
>loose sleep
Should be lose sleep
>>7237426
>no secure trip
>>
>>7237433
thanks! fixed
>>
>>7237394
You mean adding this into the general advice section?
>>
>>7237441
yeah.
>>
>>7237445
Might actually be worth creating a little footnote with that in it.

Was panning on writing in some kind of conclusion/footnote/wrap up advice anyway.

That would make a solid addition
>>
>>7237430
put on your tripfag name and say that to my face bitch, then see what happens
>>
>>7237453
hurr
Why don't you put on a trip? You seem like someone worth flitering.
>>
>>7237455
what the fuck did you just say about me you little bitch
>>
guys im being fucking serious, mod me already so i can start acting tough in-front of you lot and finally someone will look up to me as a leader of men
>>
>>7237473
Funny guy

On a serious note, I need some more feedback from you truck guys on what you think, and what truck/alternates would be a good pick for the open spots

Trucks/SUV's is by far my weakest background, I can't really judge beyond what people tell me and what I can research.
>>
As fast as your dollar can go suggestion: Turd gen camaro.

Pros: highly modifiable, most are already semi-fast in stock form

Cons: most have been raped by their abusive redneck owners (possibly literally), manual transmission is only available in 305 models and they are rare. 350 is auto only.

Mileage: 100k or so
Price: god help you if you spend more than $3000 for an '88-'92

Problems: Leaky T-Tops, transmissions likely to be bad after lots of abusive driving by Dukes wannabes.

Pic related, '89 1LE. About as rare as a stripper in church.
>>
>>7237551
>no pic
>>
File: 1355082462656.jpg-(200 KB, 1280x782, 1989-chevrolet-camaro-iro(...).jpg)
200 KB
200 KB JPG
dammit forgot pic
>>
>>7237556
>>7237554
>>7237551
thank you sir, so noted
>>
>>7237551

I myself have an '82 Z28, but from a pure bang for the buck standpoint, the Fox Body Mustang is the way to go just because it had a better rear end and manual transmission option
>>
>>7237576
If you were going to recommend a mustang, what exact models/years would you recommend?
>>
>>7237615
85-93, 85 is when the 302s started to have decent power again and 86 on all had EFI. 79-84 are similar but only good if engine is newer or modified. 80-81 were particularly shite since the 302 was dropped for a fucktarded 255 those years.
>>
>>7237615

Most bang for the buck from the cheapest '87 to '93 Mustang with a 5.0, WC T5, and 8.8"

Some of the '86 models might have that combo too, if you prefer the older body style
>>
>>7237641
Thank you

>>7237648
and thank you
>>
>>7237648

It's also worth noting that the '85 and up 5.0s had factory roller cams
>>
>>7237688
Are there any newer Cobra's/GT500's that would fit the bill, or do you guys think the 85-93 is the hot spot for bang for your buck?
>>
>>7237776
Maybe some of the 94-04 GTs, everything else is in a completely different price bracket.
>>
>>7237397
>>7237397
>>7237397
>>7237397
The alternate for the Jeep GC should be a Nissan Pathfinder. The last truck should be a 2nd gen Dodge Cummins, the alternates for luxury should be Lexus ls400/ls430. As fast as your dollar can go, I've said before, ls1 fc, ls1 240sx turbo'd Civic. Special snowflake - Merc e55, BMW 540i, and Audi s4.
>>
Alright, going to try and flush out the SUV, Truck, Lux, and Fast As You Can Go.

Still need input on the truck and SUV section guys.

Thanks for input in advance
>>
>>7237860
Will look into the Pathfinder. What exact model/years would you suggest on the Dodge Cummins?

Are any of those special snowflake available for under 5k?
>>
maybe a used kit car could be a special snowflake?
>>
>>7237879
1st or 2nd gen Dodge Cummins. Mercedes E55 is not, but BMW 540i is in that price range (or at least where I live it is) and it has a God tier 6 speed manual. Dunno about the S4 though...could be...I don't check American prices regularly though.
>>
>>7237879
Also
>Implying you can get a 2002 Jeep GC for >5k
>>
>>7237903
damn good idea. Any suggestions of the top of your head?

>>7237908
So noted on the BMW. What actual model is the 1st and 2nd gen Cummins?
>>
>>7237914
You can, at least, you can around here, found 15+ '02's just on autotrader within 50 miles of me.
>>
>>7237914
I got an '01 laredo for $3000
>>
>>7237929
>>7237966
u wot m8. where is this place, i'm going to go buy a jeep gc
>>
>>7237924
any dodge truck with a cummins. the truck itself is a shitheap, but the engine and manual tranny are God tier for trucks
>>
>>7237992
Ummm, anywhere in the american south?

The shitty economy/high gas prices means everyone is ditching their SUV's for tiny econoboxes that get good gas mileage, and hardly anyone is looking for an SUV in the used car market.

End result is that used SUV/truck prices are anout as low as they have ever been
>>
>>7237992
Family deal. But you can find one like mine for about 4000 anywhere around here (Northwest AR)
>>
File: 1355094429946.png-(407 KB, 2177x2083, RDv0.7.3.1.png)
407 KB
407 KB PNG
OK guys, here is rough draft v0.7.3.1, a few more changes, mainly to SUV's, Trucks, and Lux. First stab at Fast As Your Dollar Can Go

Changelog for v0.7.3.1 & v0.7.1 & 0.7.0:

v0.7.3.1
-Sports Cars and Wagons revise to v0.7, minor tweaks to pros/cons, mileage, and alternates

-Trucks, SUV's, and Lux updated to v0.3, tentative top choices and alternates fully written in for spaces

-"fast as dollar can go" updated to v0.1, first tentative choices written in

v0.7.1
-Tweaked colors and fonts to hopefully make it easier to read, welcome feedback on this

v0.7.0
-Added in a intro at the top

-Tentatively moved Econoboxes out of "Beta" to v1.0, possible first draft of a "finished" section. Further refined pros, cons, and alternates to section

-Sedans and Coupes revised to v0.7:
Subaru swapped into tentative top potion in Sedans, Volvo moved to alternate
Subaru swapped into tentative top position in coupes, Nissan moved into alternates
Multiple tentative alternates added/edited into coupe category

-Sports Cars revised to v0.4
info for top 3 tentative choices further refined
multiple tentative alternates added

Wagons revised to v0.4
Fully expanded all tentative top choices
Added in multiple alternates to all choices

-Truck/SUV/Lux revised to v0.1.1
further flushed out tentative top choices
added in tentative alternate choices
Still need more feedback for this section, my knowledge on trucks is weak

As always, comments, feedback, thoughts, and contributions are welcome
>>
BMW e30 needs to be some where on this chart.
>>
>>7238270
Two things.

>F-Bodies hurr can't turn
Come on. They are more expensive then the Mustangs, but they can turn a lot better. Also more modable.

>SVT Cobra
That clutch...is not heavy. I guess compared to an econobox, but compared to most V8s its actually a pretty light clutch.

Other then that, keep up the good work, etc.
>>
>>7238300
Also, (missed this before), the Tiburon is a piece of shit. I wouldn't recommend anything Hyundai. I'd put a Mazda mx-3 there instead.
>>
>>7238300
Thanks for the feedback sir, as far as the SVT, I am just drawing from what I can research, since I have actually never driven the cobra. If you have real first hand experience, i will be glad to revise.
>>
>>7238312
So noted, will look into the Mx-3
>>
>>7238313
Yeah, my friend owns a 99 SVT Cobra vert. I do like the car. In fact, my only gripes are the interior (not a fan of the cockpit style) and his butter clutch. The newer Mustangs are the same way, very light clutch for a v8.
>>
>>7238326
Cool, reversing the comments on the F-bodies, they DO turn better than a mustang truth be told.

Do you know much about the Mx-3 in terms of pros/cons, issues, ect?
>>
>>7238364
I've not heard much. Just that it is fairly reliable and good handling. Gosai_Ijin (I think was his name) could comment better...he actually owns one.
>>
>>7238270
Sentra has MY 94-90
Surprised the GS-R made the list

Liking the list.
>>
>no soobaroo forester
Why
>>
>>7238490
Seriously considered it for the wagons category, but I had already heaped 3 Subaru models together, was a little timid about making it 4

>>7238455
Fixed, and thank you sir
>>
Thoughts ion scrubbing the Tiburon and replacing with a CRX/del Sol VTEC combo as couple alternates?
>>
>>7238502
Original forrester was built from an Impreza, so that might add to parts availability.

>>7238739
If your replacing a FWD sports (Tib) with a FWD sports compact (CRX/Sol), I say bump the Celica there, and replace its in the coupe section with something else (Seperating Sentra/240/300 maybe)
>>
>>7219927

Op please remember to note that the diesels on pre '95 mercs are fucking unstoppable (for the "classy" column)

like 500k+ miles and still reliable.
>>
>>7238781
Hmm, will pull that block out on a separate sheet and mess around with some different options.

>>7238845
I plan to good sir
>>
>>7238364
OP put a BMW e30 in the special snowflake column
>>
>>7238864
not a bad idea....
Still need suggestions for a third Fast As Your Money Can Go
>>
File: 1355103624163.png-(421 KB, 2177x2083, RDv0.8.4.1.png)
421 KB
421 KB PNG
OK guys, here is rough draft v0.8.4.1

Finally have choices in all sections, reworked some choices in couples, although I am not settled on it yet, minor changes and upates everywhere else

Changelog v0.8.3.1

-Coupes, Sedans, Sports Cars, and Wagons revised to 0.8
Hyundai scrubbed in coupes, replaced with WRX and del Sol combo as alternates, tentative as of now
Minor revisions to pros/cons in all categories
Minor formatting changes

-SUV, Truck, Lux revised to v0.4
Updates to pros/cons, minor formatting changes

-Fast as You can Go revised to v0.2
3 tentative top picks written in

-Special Snowflake revised to v0.1
3 tentative top picks written in

As always, all feedback, comments, and insights welcome
>>
>>7239013
>Trans Am
>1990-2000
2001-2002 were the same as 1999.
>>
>>7239044
yes but its a price cut off, the 01 and 02 hover around 7K, best I can see
>>
>>7239052
Hey longpost differentiate between w123 and w124's in the 300d for special snowflake, and extend the years till 1994 (1995 maybe?).


Also you might as well expand it to include 240D, 190D, and 300TD, models.

You might as well just say any diesel mercedes between 1981 and 1995, two body styles (123/124), pick the one you like.
>>
>>7239150
Good point, will do
>>
File: 1355106392728.png-(423 KB, 2177x2083, RDv0.8.4.2.png)
423 KB
423 KB PNG
OK guys, here is rough draft v0.8.4.2


Changelog v0.8.4.2

-Minor change to special snowflake

Changelog v0.8.3.1

-Coupes, Sedans, Sports Cars, and Wagons revised to 0.8
Hyundai scrubbed in coupes, replaced with WRX and del Sol combo as alternates, tentative as of now
Minor revisions to pros/cons in all categories
Minor formatting changes

-SUV, Truck, Lux revised to v0.4
Updates to pros/cons, minor formatting changes

-Fast as You can Go revised to v0.2
3 tentative top picks written in

-Special Snowflake revised to v0.1
3 tentative top picks written in

As always, all feedback, comments, and insights welcome
>>
>>7239276
>No GM truck truck or SUV
Get the fuck out of here.
And get that Grand Cherokee out of there. They're shit.

>92-99 Suburban (95+ preferred)
1500s offer average reliability, with the 2500s replacing all of the weak links, and adding more engine options.

>Pros:
-Comfy as shit with a decent trim package (which is common)
-350 is bullet proof
-4L80-E and 14 Bolt in the 3/4 ton make for apocalypse-ready realiability

>Cons
-4L60-E and 10 Bolt int the 1/2 ton create weak links in the driveline, giving it just average reliability.
-The 6.5L Diesel wasn't designed as a towing powerhouse.
-Interiors suffer on base models
>Dodge RAM 1500/2500
The trucks are absolute shit. The only one worth anything is going to have a Cummins and MT, which was only available in the 2500 and 3500.

For the trucks, I'd say give one for each size.

Something like this:

mini - 1/2 ton - 3/4 & 1 ton

Ranger - 9th gen F-150 - Dodge Cummins
S-10 - GM C/K 1500 - GM Duramax
>>
Interesting little thread.
>>
>>7240022
>little thread
>over 700 posts
>>
>>7240025
what the fuck happened to my greentext?
>>
>>7239276
LS400 says GS300.

GS300's are also good, but the LS is a better fit for that market
>>
>>7239276
Are there any LS powered rwd coupes in america for around $5k?

You can pick up LS powered commodores here for five grand, and they are probably the best value car for performance mods, as well as being pretty quick out of the box.
>>
>>7240425
quick look on cars.com shows that LS powered camaros and firebirds are definitely obtainable under budget, so plus one vote for 'As fast as your dollar can go'
>>
>>7240492
>>7240492
>>7240492


Good luck finding a drive-able LS1 F-body for $5k
>>
>>7241310

That's about what they go for.
>>
A sticky is a bad idea. 5k threads never go the same twice and most of them are awful.
>>
>>7241413
ooops. forgot to sage
>>
>>7241430

>saging a stickied thread

I'll never understand these people that don't understand the basic functions of this site that try to tell everyone else what is best for this site.
>>
>>7239276

i cannot believe how anal /o/ is about these catagories, much less that you're putting up with all the bullshit and producing something good.

Keep at is LPG
>>
>>7218875
le butthurt faec
>>
>>7241569
Thank you sir

Will be doing some more work on it this afternoon, hell might even have a decent first draft out by tonight, will have to see how it goes.
>>
File deleted.
>>7241569
It he's anal enough about it then it should satisfy some threads with all the information. If some one doesn't want to read all of it they don't have to, and too bad for the idiots who read something that doesn't help them, why read about the SUV's if you are looking for an econo.

>>7241811
>prelude under alternatives
>mynigga
What about the Plymouth Laser RS Turbo AWD since it's the same as the other DSMs.
>>
>750 posts
>sticky note as image
>implying a newfag will read any percentage of this.
this thread is cancer.
>>
>>7241977
I believe the idea is to use this sticky to get maximum feedback and information to make the chart, then kill this sticky and start a new one with the finished chart.
>>
>>7241394
>>7241394
>>7241394
>>7241394

If you buy with over 20k miles on it. and I would never trust GM to do that, the engine might hold up, the car will fall apart.
>>
>>7242131
>>7242131
>>7242131

over 200k not 20k
>>
This thread is a bad idea, now i wont be able to overprice my shitboxes and pass em off to car noobs if they know what to look for
>>
>>7241977
See
>>7242011
>>
>>7242011
I would hope with the eventual goal of a single consolidated, locked sticky.
>>
File: 1355170474734.png-(42 KB, 635x551, GMCvsDodge.png)
42 KB
42 KB PNG
>>7239800
OK GMC guy, seriously took another look over the trucks and SUV's, my biggest issue with including a GMC product is all the empirical evidence I can find points to extremely lackluster quality. (pic related)

Not saying you are wrong but you are going to have to point me in some direction that reassures me about GMC quality since I don't really have any first hand knowledge about GMC vs Dodge
>>
>>7242549

I agree that the trucks need to be looked over and revised. Not really sure how you want to break it down, but I feel that the truck section should be expanded. A guy looking to buy a Mazda B2200 sized Light Truck isnt the same guy who is looking at a full size Ram or F-350.

Like my '93 C1500 is a wonderful truck. That Chevy 350, Them Average Joe towing abilities, dat extremely comfortable bench seat. I'm not a badge whore. I used to drive Jellybean gen F-150, I had the v6 and then later the v8. I used to daily one of the x-border patrol Hummer H1's the 2 Door long box one and would never one to anybody, it was a company truck and I did almost 100,000 miles on it over 2 years.

I just feel like if you are looking to put a truck on a list for people to consider buying because they want an all around truck a chevy or gmc with a 350 definitely needs a spot. Hell even older C10s and stuff.
>>
>>7242549
>Identifix
No, just no.
2nd gen Rams are built like absolute shit. The ONLY good thing about them is the Cummins, which is still a shit truck if it's got an automatic.
9th gen Fords are well built, but rust like mad. 10th gen F-150s just fall apart. Grand Cherokees are complete shit. Transmissions often have problems, and the interiors just crumble.

I'm out in the driveway working on my GMC all the time, but RARELY because I have to, even at 188k miles. So far it's needed a starter and idler pulley.

Compare that to my Mother's WJ. More broken interior pieces than whole, transmission is starting to slip, and power steering doesn't work on left turns, and it's at 130k miles. Not to mention CV joints that had already gone bad.

Chrysler is known for their shit build quality. You'r not a truck guy so I don't expect you to know all of this, but take it from someone who drives a GM and who's been around trucks his entire life.
>>
>>7242834
Ok, so if you were going to put forth a GMC truck, what exact model, over whats years?
>>
>>7242834
I don't have much experience with Ford (other then my F-150, and a last gen Bronco my dad used to have).

My 10th gen F-150 has been very reliable, everything I've had to replace was directly related to rust (and could've been prevented if any of the previous owners had ever undercoated it). I have put a decent amount of miles on the truck since I got it, for 5 months I had a 45 minute drive on the highway each way to work. That being said, I baby my vehicles. I've seen a lot of 9th gen F-150s take a shitload of abuse, and then keep going for another 10 years until the frame finally rusts out.

My experience with GMT 400s is that they are very reliable, I watch the '99 Tahoe my dad used to own get beat to hell by my uncle (who bought it from him), and other then a brake job it hasn't needed a thing in the last 5 years.

I drive a GMT800 tahoe, and so does my dad now. Overall they are fairly reliable, but the sensors go bad over so many years/miles. My dad has had to change a waterpump and a crank position sensor since he bought the truck (04 tahoe) 4 years ago. He puts a shitload of miles on his truck every year. My grandfather bought my truck new (05 z71 tahoe), and all it's needed other then brake pads and tires were a pair of O2 sensors (although the shop he had it at also sold him a new cat and MAF before determining it was the O2 sensor). In my opinion the GMT400 platform is just a bit more reliable, but that's because of the added complexity of the electronics in my trucks.
>>
>>7242879
Depends on the budget.

See >>7239800
Everything said about the Suburban carries over to the pickups, except for the years which would be 88-98 with 95+ being preferred.

Like I said, there's no reason for a Ram 1500 to be in there, nor for the Expedition to be the only fullsize SUV listed.
The Suburban is the single longest consecutively produced vehicle ever built, and Definitely deserves a top spot over any of the SUVs mentioned, and K5 Blazer or at least the Bronco should deserve honorable mention.

I understand a fullsize isn't what you want or need, but that doesn't mean this should be so heavily biased towards lighter trucks and SUVs.
>>
>>7242925
5K or under.

Will look over this post >>7239800 again.
>>
>>7242925
Coming from the least possibly biased person ever
>>
>>7242952
Up until the 10th gen F-150s, I loved Ford trucks.
And I've got no gripe with a MT Cummins Ram. I love the body lines on 2nd gen Rams, but they're just not built to last.

>>7242914
Under the right configuration, GMT-400s are god-tier reliable, and comfy as hell too. GMT-800s loose that with the added electronics, but are still better than most.
10th gen F-150s in my experience will last if babied (But what wont?) but develop a lot of minor problems and just barely stay drivable under any kind of abuse. 11th gen F-150s I can't stand. They're not comfortable and those massive mirrors and thick A pillars make for a horrible blind spot when going around slight bends.
>>
>>7242947
5k leaves no room for a Duramax (Or a Cummins 99.93% of the time)

What I would take would depend on a lot more than just it being a truck. mini truck, 1/2 ton, 3/4 ton, 1 ton, gas, Diesel, 4x4, 2wd?

Different people want different things out of trucks and SUVs, so what best for one isn't going to be best for another.
>>
File: 1355177403110.png-(39 KB, 1092x344, trucksv0.5.png)
39 KB
39 KB PNG
OK, to make this easier, this is how I have revised the trucks section thus far.

I have cleared a column to allow for a GM option and an alternate of any type

Give me the actual sales floor model (not chassis numbers) and year range of what you would suggest, and any other info such as pros, cons, known issues, all that good stuff.
>>
>>7243034

>88-98 Chevrolet/GMC C/K Series (up to '00 on select models)
1500s offer average reliability, 2500s and 3500s replace weak links, and add more engine options.

>Pros:
-Comfy as shit with a decent trim package
-350 is bullet proof
-4L80-E and 14 Bolt in 2500 and 3500 ton make for apocalypse-ready reliability
-Diesel option available even in 1/2 ton trucks
-Widely used platform means parts are always cheap and easy to find

>Cons
-4L60-E and 10 Bolt int the 1500 are weak links in the driveline, giving it just average reliability.
-The 6.5L Diesel wasn't designed as a towing powerhouse.
-Interiors suffer more than most on base models.

>Common problems
-Starter
-Transmission and rear end on 1500 models

I would recommend the S-10 under alternate just as filler, as I have ZERO experience with mini trucks.
>>
>>7243070

Pretty much this.

Other pros are that because it takes the 350 all the parts are a diamond dozen. And options are endless when it comes to modification.
>>
>>7243034
The ford column is too generalized in my opinion. The toyota column and >>7243070 all look good to me though.

I find my 10th gen XLT seats compfy as hell. I feel like we need someone who knows more about Ford trucks in general to jump in and add some stuff.
>>
>>7243146
For the Ford Column, I feel the horrible blind spots on the 11th gen should be listed under cons, as should the rust problems on previous models.
>>
>>7243102

>diamond dozen

Am I being trolled?
>>
Separate the Ranger from the other Ford trucks. Its virtually indestructible aside from rusted out leaf spring shackles and hangers.
>>
>>7243216
It's as indestructible as every other non-chrysler domestic pickup designed before the mid 90s. We all know /o/ doesn't know their collective shit about anything made by a company whose name doesn't end with 'A'
>>
>>7243165
11th gens didn't come out until 04, and I assumed the 04 being mentioned were the anniversary editions (rebadged 10th gens).

Personally I think 9th gens and 10th gens should be seperated, as should rangers, and then keep the superdutys in their own class too (I personally don't know shit about them though).

I'd like to see 1/4 tons, half tons, and 2500+s in three seperate categories, but that would probably consume more space then nessecary on what is already going to be a huge ass sticky.
>>
>>7239800
>And get that Grand Cherokee out of there.
Sort of concur, only because the standard Cherokee is a much better choice IMO
>>
>>7243070
Motherfucking this

I agree, get the dodge pickups off the list because the Chevy C/K's are so much more an obvious choice.

The Dodge Diesel is good, but good luck finding a decent one below $5k that isn't ancient or has 300k miles on it
>>
Ok, revising to include the C/K series as we speak

Opinions on dropping the Dodge and separating the Ranger out from teh rest of the Ford F-Series pick ups?
>>
>>7239276

>Toyota 4runner

3.0 V6 was the weak one, and that was in the earlier models. The upgraded 3.4 v6 is much better

>Ford Taurus Wagon
replace with
>Honda Accord Wagon
>>
>>7243275

Funny thing is you are talking about a Mazd'A' B-Series truck.
>>
>>7243340
Yeah, I'd say put the Ranger as the Alternate. I have a feeling like not many people will be buying HD trucks as their first rides anyways
>>
>>7243340
>>7243355
If you do want to include the F-250/350, just put down the Ford F-Series as a whole
>>
>>7243351
>>7243102

I feel like your humor is lost on a lot of the people who post here.
>>
>>7243340
Budget considered, you're not going to find a Cummins, which makes Dodge useless for the purposes here.
So I'm in favor of dropping it entirely.

Separating the Ranger from the F-Series seems like a must to me, and for simplicity's sake I would also recommend dropping the 2004 model year for the F-150s.
>>
>>7243034
if in the interest for the general public, i would suggest a different approach for organizing this section - this still needs a definite split between light duty vehicles and heavy duty vehicles. nobody is ever going to be on the fence between a tacoma vs a cummins... light duty and heavy duty serve 2 different purposes. you could split them "light runabouts" and "heavy haulers/towing" but however you decide to do it it needs to be done. it could also be done for the suv section. putting a rav4 next to a suburban is never going to be a useful comparison...

call me a "neck from the middle of nowhere" (nebraska native) but. in my opinion:
- for light-duty: the tacoma/t100. toyota's been making them for a long time and knows what it takes to keep a badge alive in a dying/dead vehicle class. the 4cyl rangers are up there but the taco is just more in almost every category.
- middleweight: probably a tie b/w a gm w. a 350 and the pre-jellybean f150s. both ridiculously durable and very easy to work on. also very common and easy to find parts for.
- heavyweight: pretty hard to denounce a clear winner here, as anything in this price range is going to be pretty beat up regardless of brand. a cummins motor will last but the truck around it wont, a duramax might not be too bad but still pending on shape, powerstroke probably about the same
>>
>>7243483
They aren't being "compared" to one another though, that's the thing. It's not as if I am trying to say that a Ranger is "better" than a Dodge Cummins. Its just to highlight the best used options for 5K or under for people looking for a good first car or cheap car.

I get that you can go hog wild breaking down the truck section into light duty and heavy duty, 2 vs 4 door, and all kinds of other stuff but from where I am standing, I see 2 things

1.)most people aren't going to come here looking for heavy duty trucks in a cheap car/first car situation. If they are, having 1 or 2 decent options gives them a jumping off point to go from

2.) from what I can see, heavy duty trucks push the upper limit of the 5K price unless you are willing to go old, or go high mileage, which are things that an automotive novice, which this sticky will be targeted to, doesn't really want to do.

I could be completely off base with this line of thinking, so let me know what oyu guys think
>>
>>7243511
Yeah, I agree with you, that their isn't much point to even mentioning 1 ton trucks here. Not many people are going to be considering them, and most good examples are going to be out of the price range.
>>
>>7243511
Regarding the trucks section:

I think you should make the Ford Ranger the alternate to the Tacoma, since they are in the same class more or less, and put the Tundra as the alternate to the F-150.

Put the Chevy/GMC C/K series in the remaining space, and put the Dodge Cummins Diesel is the alternate (or F250/350), if you really want to have diesels in there.
>>
>>7243530
Duramax and Cummins price their selves out.
The I.D.I.s, early Powerstrokes, and Detroits are still good sub 5k offerings though.

It doesn't necessarily need to be first car. For example if someone needs to buy a truck for work but has no idea what to look for in one, this could be useful. Plenty of topics have come up in the past looking for such. It would be foolish to assume that everyone looking for their fist car is only going to use it to go back and forth to their job at Burger King, so having variety will help.
>>
>>7243556
Tacoma - C/K Series - F-150
Ranger - F-250/350 - Tundra

This looks good to me.
>>
>>7243563
>The I.D.I.s, early Powerstrokes, and Detroits are still good sub 5k offerings though.

that's true
>>
>>7243530
You again
>>
File: 1355186529638.png-(182 KB, 418x423, 1299551036941.png)
182 KB
182 KB PNG
>>7243584
>>
>>7243511
but the problem with saying that would be effectively the same as saying "fwd cars come in 2 and 4 doors and hatch etc but bottom line they're all still fwd boxes" - not exactly either of our intended meanings but something to consider. what i'm trying to say is larger/utility vehicles are more diverse than one or two categories.

yeah could probably just leave out the heavies - anything that cheap is just going to be junk and i could never recommend one to someone for under 5k
>>
OK, revision 0.6 for trucks, give me some feedback guys
>>
File: 1355187494329.png-(44 KB, 1091x343, Trucks v0.6.png)
44 KB
44 KB PNG
OK, revision 0.6 for trucks, give me some feedback guys

this time with the actual snip-it
>>
>>7243654
Add "no V8" to list of cons for Tacoma.
>>
>>7243654
swap the common problems on C/K series so as to avoid confusion with people thinking the starter is only a common problem on 1500s, and I'd call that good enough for the trucks.
>>
>>7243511
thinking about it more i think i was most in objection about 1 tons in light dutys being on the same list, but if they're being left out it should be fine.

>>7243580
can't find anything to object about this list
>>
>>7243654
Put the Ranger as the alternate to the Tacoma, since they are both the best options for mid-sized trucks.
>>
>>7243709
You could maybe also label the columns like "full size", "mid-size", and "full size/Heavy Duty"
>>
>>7243709
I'd agree with this too. Most people that don't already know what they're looking for are going ot be looking based on size rather than brand, so it'd be best to list alternates of similar size.

All you'd have to do there is swap the Ranger and Tundra boxes.
>>
>>7243689
will do

>>7243716
will do
>>
>>7243737
>>7243689
I'd say "no v8" isn't really a con for mid-size trucks.

On the other side of the coin, one could say "better fuel economy"
>>
>>7243750
Yeah, most mid size trucks aren't doing anything where they need a V8. That's like listing "no 12V149" as a con under the full size trucks. It's not something that comes into play.
>>
>>7243750
I'll agree to disagree with you on that but it doesn't say "midsize trucks". It says "trucks". And if you're comparing it to the F and C/K series trucks "no V8" is a con.
>>
>>7243758
fair enough, no V8 dropped as con, ranger and tundra swapped
>>
>>7243763
That's the thing. It's not a direct comparison.

No V8 comes with the territory of having a mid size.
>>
>>7243763
That's why I was suggesting he add subcategories like "mid-size" for the Taco/ranger, "full size" for F-150/Tundra, and "Full/Heavy" for the C/K, F250/350
>>
File: 1355189682009.png-(44 KB, 1093x346, Trucks v0.7.png)
44 KB
44 KB PNG
Reworded the lack of V8 as "no V8 for the power hungry"

swapped ranger and tundra as suggested.

Kick this one around while I grab some dinner guys and if it looks ok, might try and start sorting out SUV's when I get back.
>>
>>7243810
Looks Bueno to me. Enjoy your dinner and let us know when you're back so I can give you some more shit about the current lack of a GM SUV.
>>
File: 1355190636447.png-(7 KB, 301x267, 1262083994524.png)
7 KB
7 KB PNG
>>7243810
Looks great. Gotta give you props for doing this man, we've been long overdue for something like this.!
>>
suv - 4runner, bronco, k5?
>>
>>7243916
Suburban - Bronco - 4Runner
K5 - Explorer - XJ w/ i6/MT?
>>
>>7243810
>>7243916
hmmm regarding SUV's

I would say replace the Grand Cherokee with the regular Cherokee. The Grand is certainly an affordable upscale suv, but the regular cherokee is more reliable, has a larger aftermarket, and more true to its purpose I think.

I'd say either give the the Rav-4/CRV their own section or get rid of them all together.

I'd also say ditch the Expedition and replace it with the Tahoe/Yukon/K5. The Expedition is a good platform, but the Tahoe is just as good, and a lot more cool (i.e. less soccer mom) if you ask me

Make the Pathfinder as the Alternate to the 4Runner
>>
>>7243952
>replace it with the Tahoe/Yukon/K5

and put the Bronco or Expedition as the Alternate
>>
>>7243947
For simplicity's sake:
Suburban - Bronco - 4Runner
Tahoe/Yukon - K5 - Explorer
>>
>>7243989
And keep a separate category for Crossovers.
>>
>>7243992
>even considering a crossover, ever
kill yourself
>>
File: 1355192211519.jpg-(47 KB, 239x200, 1350413834226.jpg)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>7243992
>Thinking I would ever consider a crossover
>>
File: 1355192314516.png-(47 KB, 1091x348, SUV v0.6.png)
47 KB
47 KB PNG
>>7243911
>>7243881
Cool deal, and thank you sir

>>7243947
>>7243952
>>7243952
>>7243989
In so far as SUV's go, this is what I had reworked when I stopped to focus on trucks.

Again, I think there should be at least one solid small SUV and an alterante, so I am partial to keeping the Rav4 and CR-V

In so far as the rest, I am open suggestions?

I see Tahoe/Yukon and Suburban popping up a bunch. Thoughts?
>>
>>7243989
>Explorer
lolno

>suburban

Too pigfat. I don't see anyone really wanting to buy one of these anyways
>>
>>7243810
You should swap the whole Tacoma and F-150 column, so that they're in order by size. That's just my OCD though.

>>7244040
I'd like to see the standard cherokee replace the Grand Cherokee, just because they are a lot more available and a more popular choice (might just be my area though).

Also, you should throw a '/Tahoe' next to the suburban, for the simple reason that I like Tahoes. Nobody really needs that extra 2 feet of space.
>>
>>7244040
Problem being the Rav4, CR-V, Pilot, etc. aren't SUVs. They're AWD cars with shapes inspired by SUVs.

For the Suburban, refer back to >>7239800
Maybe even add to the Pros that extra-comfy conversions are fairly common.

For Tahoe/Yukon:
>Pros
-Comfy as shit with a decent trim package (which is common)
-350 is bullet proof
-Available in 2-door and 4-door configurations
-cheap, easy to find parts

>Cons
-The 6.5L Diesel wasn't designed as a towing powerhouse.
-(To my knowledge) No Diesel option on 4-door variants
>>
>>7244113
Swapped for the sake of everyone's OCD haha

Will look into the regular Cherokee and see if the Suburban and Tahoe are enough alike that I can meld them together although I suspect they are

>>7244114
regular ass people view them as small SUV's thought
>>
>>7244040
Why not do a small, medium, large setup like with the trucks?
Something like Rav4, pathfinder, suburban/tahoe
alternatives CR-V, cherokee, expoedition

I honestly don't think the K-5 should be in there, as much as I love them.
>>
>>7244144
hmm interesting idea, will toss this around
>>
>>7244058
Explorers can often be found for around $1k
They may be shit, but at that price they're worth it.

Suburbans aren't pigfat, they're just big.

>>7244113
Only reason I'd like to see the Suburban separate is because they bridge some of the gap between the SUVs and trucks. Suburbans are offered with Diesels unlike the 4 door Tahoe/Yukon, they're offered in heavy duty applications, and lower trim models are a whole lot more common in them. As much alike as they are, they're still vastly different animals. People looking for a 2wd Tahoe SLT aren't going
to be looking for a 4x4 3/4 ton base trim Big Block Suburban.

Keep in mind he has limited space too, so listing the differences would make it impossible for him to list the pros and cons of each.
>>
You guys got to remember your audience here. Most of the 4chan userbase are males 16-30 years old and single. Those who are looking for SUV's will want them either for off-roading, towing shit, or to carry large items, not hauling 8 kids to soccer practice or loading up with groceries at Costco. The SUV section should be created with that in mind.

That said, Either drop the suburban or combine it with the Tahoe/Yukon or the K5, since they are more or less based on the same platform.
>>
>>7244135
Oh yeah, the tahoe is literally a suburban with a foot and a half chopped off the end. I believe they also came with up to 9 person seating (My '05 does anyway), but probably fewer engine configurations.

I agree, small SUVs should have a place, and this is the best spot unless you want to throw them in with wagons or something stupid.
>>
>>7244155
I do understand the differances, I'm just thinking of who is going to be reading this. I'm thinking it's mostly going to be kids looking for a first car, so the likely configuration ius going to be 1500 with a 350 reguardless of weather it's a tahoe or suburban. That's probably just my opinion though.

Maybe a small note in the pros like "Suburban available in 3/4 ton/diesel configurations for towing" would suffice.
>>
>>7244159
Not entirely. We're talking about GMT400s here.
Tahoe/Yukon was never offered with a 3rd row seat in this body.
4 door Tahoe/Yukons were only available with the 350.
Suburbans were available with big blocks, 14 bolt rear ends, 3/4 tons came with the 4L80-E, etc.
>>
>>7244184
>Maybe a small note in the pros like "Suburban available in 3/4 ton/diesel configurations for towing" would suffice.
Not really, as the 2 door Tahoe/Yukons were also offered with Diesels.

You're thinking of someone that's looking at an SUV just because they want an SUV. Thing is, they're different animals made for different uses. Anyone that will be looking for the uses of a Suburban usually isn't going to be looking at a Tahoe or Yukon.

People that bother to look at this will be looking based on their needs, not just LOLITSANSUV. Most people like that wouldn't bother to look.
>>
Here's my suggestion, maybe you'll be ok with this GMC guy

Cheap, american
Jeep Cherokee
Alt: Explorer

Large, American
'92 and up K5/Tahoe/Suburban, since the only difference between them is Size and engine configs on the Suburb
Alt: '87 and up Bronco

Reliable Japanese
4Runner
Alt: Pathfinder
>>
>>7243810
>Tacoma better than Ranger

No. Fuck no.
>>
I would like to see expedition moved down to an alternative. Not just because I am partial to GM products, but up north tahoes/suburbans are far more common then expeditions (all the ford SUV guys here go for an explorer). I think that could easily be done if we call tahoe/suburban the primary choice, note the engine configurations of the suburban in the pros, and call expedition the alternative.

>>7244144
I still vote for organizing by size. I feel like we should have one "best" option for each class (crossover type suvs, 1/4 based suvs, and fullsize suvs) and have everything else as alternatives.

at the very least the pathfinder should be set as an alternative to the 4runner. I'd like to see a standard cherokee up there, but it would have to be a second alternative under the pathfinder.
>>
>>7244272
are you fucking high?

The only advantage rangers have over Tacos is that they are cheap
>>
>>7244276
*Far more common up north! That's important!
I find the reverse is true in southern states (few exploders, lots of expeditions).
>>
>>7244277
You dumbass. Rangers are built much better than a Tacoma. Whens the last time you heard of a Ranger rusting in half?
>>
>>7244291
>>7244276

The only reasons I see to keep the Explorer and Expedition on the list is that the market is flooded with them, and therefore they are cheap, as well as being decently reliable.

I can't really see them being /o/ approved in that they lack cool factor entirely.
>>
>>7244308
>Rangers are built much better than a Tacoma. Whens the last time you heard of a Ranger rusting in half?

I'd definitely argue that. I don't live in a rust state though, so maybe you do have a point there. Functionally and mechanically, the Tacos are hands down better though.
>>
If we absolutely had to keep small SUV's on there, I'd say do it like this

CRV 4Runner K5/Tahoe/Suburb
Rav4 Cherokee Bronco

something along those lines
>>
>>7244276
Perhaps just create an all different class for Crossovers and small SUVs? Seems fair considering there's different classes for econobox/coupe/sedan/sports/wagon

Maybe

CRV - JK - Explorer
Rav4 - Wrangler - Durango

Suburban - Tahoe/Yukon - Bronco
Expedition - Grand Cherokee - K5
>>
>>7244324
The only mechanical problem the Ranger has is 3L v6 camshaft synchronizer/sensor going out. A 100K+ mile issue. otherwise its solid apart from normal wear and tear.
>>
File: 1355195479889.jpg-(10 KB, 200x200, 1345339029506.jpg)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>7244277
I have to agree with this. You can undercoat both, from what I've seen tacomos will run until they rust in half with nothing but an occasional oil change, rangers are pretty reliable, but the tacoma is damn hard to beat.
>>
>>7244337
>>7244339
I'd be alright with either of these. I just hate seeing crossovers jammed in there. Few people who are considering a truck based suv would go for a crossover, so they really should have their own place somewhere.

I'm more partial to Ramiel's structure, just because I think three fullsize catagories is excessive.

Also, I'd personally put the JK in the same class as the bronco/k5, a class for people that just want an SUV for offroading. I wouldn't generalize the k5 and suburban in one category though, that's be like having the ranger and f-250 in the same category.

Ideally I still stand by crossover/quarter ton/ fullsize
>>
>>7244391
Reading that back, putting the JK and bronco in the same class sounds retarded. I dunno.
>>
File: 1355195992444.png-(46 KB, 1092x346, SUV v0.7.png)
46 KB
46 KB PNG
First off, thanks for the great feedback guys, I really appreciate you guys helping me put this together

Here is my first rewrite based on your guys feedback, kick it around, let me know what you think.

I did try and arrange it by small, medium, and large/large-ish
>>
>>7244343
So basically your saying its better to buy a Tacoma and just spray a shitload of oil under it than to buy a Ranger thats just as reliable that doesn't require undercoating, and has been basically the same its entire production span and therefore is well proven itself has very, very little to go wrong with it.
>>
>>7244391
I put the K5, tahoe, and Suburban together, not only because of the mechanical similiarities, but also because I see them appealing to the guy looking for the massive, "Muh big Murrican Truck" sort of thing.
>>
>>7244391
>just because I think three fullsize catagories is excessive.
Not when you consider how many categories there are for cars, and how much more versatile and different SUVs are.
>>
>>7244409
Pretty much, yeah.
I see a lot of rangers rusted in half up here, nothing survives without undercoating.
I've never heard of someone switching from a tacoma to a ranger for reliability, I have heard the opposite though.
>>
>>7244403
You could have an even bigger SUV category, like a 2500 Suburban or Excursion
>>
>>7244411
Because that's how you see them. A lot of people actually have uses for such vehicles, and wouldn't see them as such.

That's like putting a mini and a C4 in the same category for people just wanting "mah sporty little car"
>>
>>7244435
Alright, you're winning me over. I'd rather see more categories then having too much generalized.

I just really feel like the Bronco and k5 are in their own class, they seem to appeal heavily to the offroad crowd, and are significantly smaller then a GMT400 tahoe or suburban. They are also significantly larger then other offroading choices, like a wrangler though.

>>7244403
I like it, but I still see the 4runner and pathfinder as the same class, I don't have enough knowlege to pick one over the other though, and I don't know if two alternatives would look messy (I don't want to drop the cherokee).

Maybe crossovers should be given a column up with AWD sedans/wagons, as they still seem out of place to my under the 4runner.
>>
>>7244460
Maybe drop the pathfinder to alternates with rav4 and cr-v, switch cherokee to top pick, maybe move the explorer over to mid sized alternate???
>>
>>7244460
>I just really feel like the Bronco and k5 are in their own class, they seem to appeal heavily to the offroad crowd, and are significantly smaller then a GMT400 tahoe or suburban. They are also significantly larger then other offroading choices, like a wrangler though.
Exactly. Even in the Fullsize class you've got variants ranging from the K5 or Bronco all the way up to a 454 3/4 ton Suburban. With all that, you can't stuff in the best of the mid size choices AND crossovers. It's just not right, and there's not enough room.
>>
>>7244470
I really just don't see a crossover as an alternative to a truck based SUV.
Cherokees are far more common then pathfinders up here, but I don't have enough experience with either to recommend a switch,
I wouldn't mind moving the explorer over to the mid sized column though.
>>
>>7244485
The problem is that crossovers don't fit in anywhere else, unless you want to give them one column under the econobox class.
>>
>>7244482
I completely agree with you. I wouldn't mind some designation between half ton and 3/4 ton SUVs.

To be honest though, I don't see the need to mention the K5 or Bronco. I think it's a small enough niche that anyone who wants one would just go get it, instead of having a sticky recommend it (if that makes any sense).

Crossovers, on the other hand, are very common up here. People want AWD for the snow, but don't want truck sized gas mileage. Very few people consider AWD cars.
>>
>>7244493
That is probably the best option in my opinion. They are essentially econoboxes for people that are afraid of snow up here.
>>
>>7244409
dude, seriously? i mean i said it myself earlier that the ranger is a pretty good mini truck, but rust-proof? they're not some kind of 'divine gift from above' or anything. it's still a man-made machine that's going to fall apart and rust over time. it was probably one of the best of the minitrucks at one point in time but ford let it die and toyota kept innovating the tacoma and making it better and better - which stands to say why one is still around today and the other is not.
>>
File: 1355197613533.png-(38 KB, 1093x344, SUVs v0.7.1.png)
38 KB
38 KB PNG
Ok, taking a time out on figuring out what to do with small SUV's for the moment, tell me what you think of my medium and large sections thus far
>>
>>7244515
I'm probably being annoying as fuck, I apologise, but I consider both the 4runner and pathfinder to be midsize.
>>
>>7244526
Not annoying, I need the feedback, trucks and SUV's are not my strong suit
>>
>>7244501
Even still, it'd b hard to cover all of the remaining actual SUVs with one class. You've got something like a 2500 Suburban as a huge workhorse that'll pull your house if need be, to the fullsize Brono/Blazer, to the soccer mom Tahoe/Yukon, to the more sensible S-10 Blazer, to the Off Road enthusiast JK or beach cruising Wrangler.

It, to someone that sees the utility aspect of SUVs, is absolutely retarded to confine the entire class to three best picks, and one alternate to each.
It's just too broad a category, I see there as being far more variance here than between Coupes and Sedans.
>>
Also god damn it, it is looking like I AM going to have to do a separate category for small as SUV's & "crossovers"

If I have to do that one, I have to do ANOTHER category to balance the chart back out.
>>
>>7244529
Personally I'd go 4runner/pathfinder as primary, and cherokee/exploder as alternatives, if you don't mind throwing two in each box.

I have VERY little experience with the 4runner and pathfinder, but from who I have seen and heard, both are very reliable and good at what they do. The exploder and cherokee are similar enough to share an alternative box in my opinion, both are cheap, and fairly reliable for an american non-v8
>>
>>7244538
ok, so right now I just have Trucks and SUV's


I am thinking of multiplying these 2 into 4:

Trucks
Midsize/Fullsize SUV's
Small SUV's & Crossovers
Mystery category XXXX

What would you guys think of doing this? And what the hell would the 4th category be? Full on off roaders?
>>
>>7244552
I'd definetly go offroaders, and throw a few jeeps and the K5/Bronco in there.

Crossovers could go up with econoboxes though, if that doesn't fuck everything up.

I'm just wondering what else your putting with crossovers.
>>
>>7244493
>>7244499
mentioned it here >>7243483 and here >>7243595 for trucks.

there definitely needs to be something separate for light suv's/crossovers and heavier duty suv's - you can make either class big enough to fill it with 6 good entries that are all relatively close in function and use
>>
>>7244538
Maybe sans the all but useless snowflake category?

Bronco - Suburban - Tahoe/Yukon
K5 - Expedition - Grand Cherokee

Cherokee - S10 Blazer - 4Runner
Wrangler - Explorer - Pathfinder

Any objections to that?
>>
I must admit I was skeptical at first, but it's turning out to be p cool.
>>
>>7244574
>>7244579
Yeah, trucks was slightly easier to work out, simply because the budget ruled out things that would have otherwise required it to be split up. Thats not turning out to be the case here with SUV's

I think I am going to split it up, keep trucks the way it is. I will split SUV's into 2 categories, light/crossovers & midsize/fullsize

To balance things out, I'll create a "full on offroader" category, which actually isnt that bad because I can see that being a class people on 4chan would actually care about.
>>
>>7244602
And thank you google chrome for turning my trip off for no reason.

At any rate, what do people think of this?
>>
>>7244581
Not a bad idea. I'd be in favour of giving crossovers a column there though. There's just too damn many mid-size SUVS!

Looking at the whole sticky, I understand the structureing issues though. Maybe you could keep the fullsize section as is, and change the small/midsize to one column of crossovers, and a doublewide midsize column.
Personally I'd call it something like
CR-V | Pathfinder - 4Runner
rav4 | cherokee - exploder (-s10 blazer)
>>
>>7244552
trucks
med-large suv's: road-native
crossovers/small things
suv/crawlie things: dirt/offroad-native
>>
>>7244602
>which actually isnt that bad because I can see that being a class people on 4chan would actually care about.
Very true, but then again nothing is going to be full on off roader from the factory, and you could easily turn all of the full size SUVs, most of the small SUVs, and all of the trucks into one with near equal time and money.
>>
>>7244602
>>7244617
I think that's the way to do it. I'm more then happy with the current trucks revision. My only concern is the void that would be left in the fullsize class by moving the K5/Bronco to an offroad class.
>>
>>7244629
There would definetly be a lot of overlap, but I feel like it would be the best place to put the K5, and you could easily fill in the rest with a jeep or two.
>>
>>7244635
Well, let me pen in the new categories, get things shuffled around, and we can see if we can nail down mid/full sized SUV's keeping in mind I am going to add in a small/cross over category and an offroader category
>>
>>7244602
the offroader category is definite section that'll appeal to a select first-time buyer but the question is, 'how select?' can it be filled with your 3 mains with 3 alternatives?
>>
>>7244623
>Maybe you could keep the fullsize section as is, and change the small/midsize to one column of crossovers, and a doublewide midsize column.
True, but as I listed it, anything from both categories could be turned into an off road machine.

I feel like creating an off road specific category would end up mostly Jeeps, furthering the general public's idiocy in assuming that Jeeps are invincible off road just because of the Jeep badge. They're not all bad, but neither are they all they're cracked up to be.
>>
>>7244623
I like this idea still. Anybody have any objections to a doublewide midsize column?

Also, what would the three offroad categories be? Small (JK or whatever with something like a geo tracker as an alternative), fullsize (K% and Bronco), and _________
>>
>>7244581
I'm ok with this, but I'm still kinda sticking with these two for the sake of keeping things simple >>7244270
>>7244337


We could also just stick the Crossovers in the "special snoflake" section
>>
>>7244661
What about throwing a jeep as an alternative to a tracker/samurai (to piss off jeep owners), fullsize category, and then use the third column to direct people to the midsize/fullsize section?
>>
>>7244661
>They're not all bad, but neither are they all they're cracked up to be.

Said like a true GM fanboi.

Bang for your buck-wise, they are probably the best choice for offroading.
>>
File: 1355199666070.jpg-(106 KB, 410x1058, 1354589402991.jpg)
106 KB
106 KB JPG
>>7244671
>We could also just stick the Crossovers in the "special snoflake" section
>>7244677
>What about throwing a jeep as an alternative to a tracker/samurai
>>
>>7244671
I wouldn't be against separating the american/japanese midsize SUVs, as that would be a good way to divide them, and there is a significant difference in price between american and japanese suvs up here.

Crossovers| Cherokee | 4runner
| exploder | pathfinder

or something.
>>
File: 1355199826417.png-(38 KB, 1090x342, MSFS_SUV v0.7.1.png)
38 KB
38 KB PNG
Ok guys, created a Small/Crossover section & an offroader section.

can cross the offroader bridge when I get to it, but for now, keeping in mind we now have an entire separate category for small SUV's and crossovers, what would you guys recommend doing to flush out our midsize/fullsize SUV chart??
>>
>>7244695
The reason I pair the Cherokee and Exploder together is that you can find good examples of them for $1-2k bucks.

Unless its a 1st gen 4Runner, your probably looking at least $3k for one. I'm not too sure about pathfinders though.
>>
>>7244688
>GM fanboy
>Loves pre-jellybean Fords
>Loves 2nd gen Rams, but hates their shit build quality
>Wants a Jurassic Park Wrangler

Yeah, nah.

Jeeps would be great for the money, but they're not after Jeeptax.
You can often buy an S10 Blazer, lift it and slap on some 33s before you can afford a stock XJ or Wrangler.
>>
>>7244689
I 100% agree with putting crossovers in the snowflake section. Wouldn't that drop us back down to a single SUV section though?
I still just think mid-size is too big a category for one column, unless you just wanna call it japanese primary, cherokee/american alternative.
>>
>>7244707
Put 4Runner/Pathfinder in the 1st column.

Also I'd extend the XJ range to include the originals starting in 1984. I personally would swap them with the Explorer as well, but I can leave that up for discussion.
>>
>>7244713
>>7244712
guys, see here>>7244707

U am going to do a seperate category for small SUV's and crossovers, made a new offroad category to balance things out.

Gives us 8-12 spots for midsize/fullsize SUV's depending on how much we wanna squish in there
>>
>>7244707
Give Suburban it's own box, like so: >>7239800
Then Put up an Early Excursion as the alternative. That would flush out that category.
>>
>>7244707
Personally I think you should fill the void with a Japanese midsize section. The 4runner and pathfinder are the same size as the cherokee and explorer.

But what are you going to put in the crossover/small section?

Personally I'd still go crossover/midsize, then fullsize. That still leaves a one column void in the fullsize section.
>>
>>7244712
>You can often buy an S10 Blazer, lift it and slap on some 33s before you can afford a stock XJ or Wrangler.

I don't know about that. If you didn't care about offroad, then yes, an S10 Blazer would be cheaper possibly. But the Jeep has solid axles and a superior powertrain, as well as a way larger aftermarket. It is cheaper to mod a Jeep then anything else out there. And you can get a good example for $1500 easy
>>
>>7244732
The suburban doesn't need its own box, just keep it with the Tahoe
>>
>>7244724
Crossovers | American mid | Japan mid

__________| halfton based (tahoe/expedition) | 3/4 based (suburban)

Maybe?
>>
>>7244707
ried quality.

ride quality
>>
>>7244750
Here in the States, down by the beach, it takes a hell of a lot less shopping around to find a $1000 S10 than it does a $1500 Cherokee, and you rarely see Wranglers under $3500 no matter how bad of shape they're in.
>>
>>7244766
I'm just wondering what is going with the crossovers in the small SUV category.
>>
>>7244732
Excurions doesn't really look like it will fly, hard to find even early ones under 5k

And I think the Suburban and Tahoe are close enough to stay in the same column
>>
>>7244766
We've already been over the fact that you don't know or care about fullsize SUVs, so I don't expect you to appreciate or fully understand the differences. But someone looking for one, will.
>>
>>7244777
XJ's and ZJ's are still cheap as fuck though. I live in LA and see about 60 examples betwee, 500 and 2000 bux
>>
>>7244793
You still haven't explained why the Suburban needs its own section.
>>
>>7244792
Like I said, someone looking for one is going to know they're built for different purposes.
Just on my local Craigslist, about 1/3 of the Excursions (all model years) are under $5k.
>>
>>7244815
should the Yukon not be on here somewhere? just throwing it out there?

And what jap SUV's are considered midsize/fullsize?
>>
>>7244806

>>7244155
>>7244207
>>7244234
>>7244416
>>7244432
>>7244435
>>
>>7244815
The only freaking difference is that the Suburban has extra cargo room and a 3/4 ton trim. They can still be blanketed together. This isn't a 4x4 sticky FFS.

Also, Excursions are a terrible idea
>>
>>7244826
The Tahoe should be paired with the Yukon, and the Suburban given it's own box.
>>
>>7244826
Yukon is a rebadged Tahoe.

You won't find a fullsize jap suz for under 5k. The 4runner and pathfinder are the two midsized jap SUVs.

To be honest, the suburban doesn't really need it's own section, but what else are you going to put in the space?
>>
>>7244844
Like a half a percent of people are gonna be concerned that the Suburban can come with a diesel and a 14 bolt. Just fucking make a note of that in the "pros" section or whatever.
>>
>>7244846
No. See, you don't know the differences.

>Typical Jeep fanboi
>>
>>7244853
Ok, ok...let me toss this around and see how it falls out


I would LIKE to include one non american SUV, whats the best pick of non american/japanese midsize or fullsize SUV's??
>>
>>7244873
I just read all your differences. Its like saying the the GM C/K 2500/3500 deserve their own section in the trucks category, apart from the 1500.

Stop being difficult
>>
>>7244887
4Runner for midsize

for Full size, I guess the Landcruiser
>>
>>7244869
anyone concerned about reliability, towing, or fuel economy will care.

Just because YOU don't care doesn't mean no one else will.
>>
>>7244868
http://www.carsforsale.com/find_a_vehicle/advancedsearch.aspx?make=Toyota&model=4Runner&from
year=-1&toyear=-1&zip=&fromprice=2000&toprice=5000&radius=500&fueltypeid=

http://www.carsforsale.com/find_a_vehicle/advancedsearch.aspx?make=Nissan&model=Pathfinder&f
romyear=-1&toyear=-1&zip=&fromprice=2000&toprice=5000&radius=500&fueltypeid=

Seems to me you can find the 4runner and the pathfinder for under 5k easy

>>7244873
I would agree that their is a difference, but I may lump the GM otions together, point out the differences in the column so we can get some non american options on the board
>>
>>7244887
So as it sits right now, what 6 categories are occupying the two blocks?

I honestly think anything fullsize, non-american, and under 5K is not a good recontamination by the way. I can't think of anything that would be halfway reliable here in north america.
>>
>>7244893
If the 1500s were only offered in RCSB configurations, that would be valid. Luckily there's more overlap in the configurations available on the trucks, which is why it makes sense to blanket them together.
>>
>>7244904
look, I'm just trying to keep things simple. As far as the general 4chan public is concerned, the Tahoe and Suburban are pretty much the same thing. If someone REALLY cares about towing and cargo, they've probably done enough research where they don't even need this guide.

Combining the Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban and giving special mention to the Suburban's extra abilities is enough
>>
>>7244922
Keep the non-American options in the small/crossover category. You're not going to find anything bigger that's an import and is reliable for under $5k.
>>
File: 1355201753046.jpg-(58 KB, 476x639, 1278433764107.jpg)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
Here's my final suggestion
Cherokee- 4runner - Tahoe/Yukon/Suburban
Explorer - Pathfinder - Expedition

There, we got Cheap section, reliable section, and large section

Crossovers should be elsewhere, and really, hardly belong on something with /o/'s seal of approval. Maybe we can put the K5, Bronco, and Wrangler in some special offroad section
>>
>>7244944
It would take up so much space to list the differences in the 2 door Blazer/Tahoe/Yukon, 4 door Tahoe/Yukon, and Suburban, that there wouldn't be any room to actually list the pros and cons that apply to the entire lineup.

The average 4chan user looking for a fullsize SUV will be looking at one based on what they need, not based on GMSUV, FORDSUV, or JAPSUV.
This is precisely why the Ranger was separated from the F-series in the truck section. They're both Ford pickups, but they're built for different purposes.
>>
>>7244980
If we want to drop the offroad section, and just have one SUV section, I say put crossovers in the snowflakes and go with something like this.

If we want to keep the two SUVs, and offroad section, I still say:

Crossover | American mid | Japanese mid

_________| Fullsize 1500 | 3/4ton+

I'd be fine with either of the two options though.
>>
>>7244997
>They're both Ford pickups, but they're built for different purposes.

yeah no shit, they are in entirely different classes

for all intensive purposes, the Tahoe and Suburban are both "large SUV's", and many of the trims are Identical. I can reason with you that the K5 and Suburban don't belong together though.
>>
>>7245010
We could also do an SUV Alternative section, and have something like

Crossover [] Offroad Small (wrangler/samurai) [] Offroad large (K5/Bronco)
>>
>>7245035
I think for the structure of the sticky though, we need to have either one SUV section, or three. If we aren't dropping the offroad designation, I think it makes sense to keep two SUV sections. I personally think that is the best way to structure it if we do keep two SUV sections.
>>
File: 1355202405456.png-(45 KB, 1091x344, MSFS_SUV v0.8.png)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
Haha OK, fuck I wish I knew more about SUV's, would make this easier, but here is my best compilation based on feedback so far

Toss it around and let me know what you guys think
>>
>>7245064
I AM for the sake of my own sanity, splitting the SUV's into 2 sections and adding an off road section, haha
>>
>>7245067
>no 4Runner

Seriously WTF
>>
>>7245067
And I still feel like putting the suburban apart is bakas
>>
>>7245081
>>7245084
sorry, got so many SUVs spinning in my head, IS the 4runner a legit midsize/fullsize?
>>
>>7245067
Not bad. Just move suburban to the end (OCD again).

What are your plans for the small/crossover section?
>>
>>7245095
Midsize.
>>
>>7245095
4 runner is jap and midsize.
I assumed you were going to put japanese midsize into the same block as crossovers (is that the case?)

>>7245084
Assuming we are sticking with two SUV sections, it's the best way to do it. We have more then enough spaces for every class, so the 3/4s can get their own.
>>
>>7245010
Small/Crossover
CR-V - Wrangler - 4Runner
Rav4 - Samurai - Pathfinder

midsize/fullsize
Suburban - Tahoe/Yukon - Cherokee
Excursion - Expedition - S10 Blazer

Off road
Bronco - list 4x4 SUVs - list 4x4 trucks
Blazer - " - "


Something like this?
>>
File: 1355202881289.jpg-(334 KB, 1600x1200, Ford-Excursion_mp8_pic_33212.jpg)
334 KB
334 KB JPG
>>7245067
Still missing the 'SUVs for small penis people" list
>>
>>7245108
Ok, I'm good with this, but get the Excursion off there and put the Bronco/Blazer in it's place as an Honorable mention.

then we can just have 2 SUV sections. There's not really anything else to put into that third section after all.
>>
>>7245116
Other then the gaps, I like it.
You could arguably move the wrangler/samurai exclusivly to the offroad section, but either way you have two voids to fill. Your way, you could easily just regurgitate some stuff into the offroad section.
>>
File: 1355203224527.png-(45 KB, 1091x340, MSFS_SUV v0.8.1.png)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
4Runner is getting punted over to small/crossover

OK, switched around for OCD purposes, what do you guys think of this as a final draft for the midsize/fullsize before moving on to small/crossover?
>>
>>7245134
K5 as an Alternative to a Suburban? Are you still thinking that a C4 Vette and Mini should be put together because they're both small and fun?
>>
>>7245134
The problem really is that we would then have an odd number of blocks, unless we want to make a new one completely unrelated to SUVs.
>>
>>7245148
Throw a jap midsize tag above the 4runner when you get to that point and I'll be completely happy.
>>
>>7245150
I said Honorable Mention, do you even read? Just looking for a place to put those two
>>
>>7245148
I would say go along the lines of what >>7245116 has
>>
File: 1355203575389.png-(413 KB, 446x597, usa.png)
413 KB
413 KB PNG
>>7245156
>do you even read?
I was never taught how to read.
>>
>>7245160
OK, let me rework the small and crossover UNDEr the mid and full size, post them together, let people give me some feedback on them together
>>
>>7245156
>>7245150
Or, what you could do is replace the Excursion with the Expedition, and then have the K5/Bronco as an alternate to the Tahoe, Yukon.

I dunno. I think that the K5 and Bronco deserve to be up there, but we shouldn't have to create a whole separate category for them. If we can just slip them in somewhere...
>>
>>7245197
The extra category would also be used to list which from the other two categories are best suited for regular off road use, and could also contain the CUCV Blazers and pickups. Plus it evens out the chart.
>>
>>7245197
Expedition=F150 size
Excursion=Superduty size
>>
>>7245214
Yeah, but then you are getting in to complicated territory, where people will be arguing what makes the best offroaders, plus how much modification is to be considered. And also some the likely candidates are already listed in other sections.

>>7245219
Right, but both the Suburban and Expedition offer 3rd row seating. Maybe I'm just being biased against the Excursion, but I just think its that practical of a vehicle, plus its never been praised very well by the automotive press, nor have I ever seen /o/ praise it that much. Also price range.
>>
>>7245241
>but I just think its that practical
but I just think it's NOT that practical

hurp
>>
>>7245214
actually, the more I think about it, you have a good point there, and I'm not against getting CUCV's up somewhere on this chart.

Picking the two best offroad Suv's might be tough, but for my 2 cents it'd be the Cherokee and wrangler, (or first gen 4runner)
>>
>>7245241
That's going to happen regardless.It's easier to stick the Bronco, K5 Blazer/Jimmy, CUCV Blazer/Pickup there as they generally don't make the best DDs but are more geared towards heavy offroad use and abuse.

My Grandmother's Grand Caravan also has 3rd row seating, I suppose it should replace the Excursion?

The Suburban and Excursion are both offered with 3rd row seating, a 3/4 ton platform, common in a wide range of trim packages, and have available Diesels.

The 4 door Tahoe/Yukon and Expedition are both short wheelbase, exclusively gas powered 1/2 tons that are generally very hard to come by in base trim.

Ten seconds of searching yields several Excursions for $3500-5000 within five minutes of me.
>>
>>7245241
It can tow a hell of alot more, plus its a bit more roomy. Also has the diesel engine option. Also has the solid front axle. Also generally built tougher. Also dat 3 hatch tailgate.
>>
>>7245292
OK OK OK I concede. You've made a decent case for the Suburban/Excursion. For the sake of keeping things moving along we'll go with the plan you mentioned earlier, and we can work on filling out the offroad based section.
>>
File: 1355205310050.png-(87 KB, 1090x681, FullSUV_v0.1_v0.8.2.png)
87 KB
87 KB PNG
OK< here is my first shot at the combined Small/crossover & Mid/Large SUV
>>
Here's an idea: how about throwing the Wrangler and Samurai along side the Bronco and Blazer in the offroad section.

>>7245347
I can dig it
>>
>>7245354
I'm not opposed to this. Neither of them make particularly great DDs.

>>7245347
Now we're getting somewhere. Looking good.
>>
>>7245347
"some catchy tagline"

This actually fits the category disturbingly well.
>>
>>7245354
>>7245377
>>7245391
Nice.

How would you suggest ordering the mains and the alternates? I just kinda threw those in, didn't really think about any sort of ordering
>>
>>7245398
Regarding the Offroad section...

The K5 and Bronco are so evenly matched, I couldn't really say which is better. I'm sure the internet is full of arguments about it though. I'll let someone else give input on it.

As for the Wrangler and Samurai...Wrangler as the main and Samurai as the alternate.

For the last section, I think the CUCV would be a good main, can't really think of an alternate, unless we want to do CUCV pickup/CUCV K5
>>
>>7245398
For the other sections, how about this:

CRV [] Cherokee [] 4Runner
Rav4 [] S10 Blazer [] Pathfinder


Explorer [] Tahoe/Yukon [] Suburban
G. Cherokee [] Expedition [] Excursion
>>
>>7245470
i am not opposed to this, but had a lot of people shit all over the grand cherokee earlier?
>>
>>7245470
All in favor say aye.

Aye.
>>
>>7245491
The shit was more due to the GC being put directly over something else, while many much better options were omitted entirely. Now, we've actually got room for it, and it's listed as an alternative.
>>
>>7245504
ok, I can throw my hat into the aye ring as well then.

Everyone else?
>>
>>7245509
Aye.
>>
>>7245470
>>7245496
>>7245509
>>7245527
Looks like we're all in agreement. Proceed.
>>
>>7245539
Proceeding, give me a moment
>>
File: 1355208403676.png-(79 KB, 1090x683, FullSUV_v0.2_v0.8.3.png)
79 KB
79 KB PNG
Alright, here we go guys,

Tell me what you think, if we are happy with this, we can start scrapping together the off roaders
>>
>>7245601
We're happy with this.
>>
>>7245601
Should probably specify a 2500 suburban so its more direct in comparison to the Excursion.

Excursion should be noted that it might be a better choice for those who want something more capable for towing and offroad.
>>
>>7245741
Doesn't need to be a direct comparison, and there's no reason not to include the 1/2 ton Suburban.

Off road vehicles will receive further mention at a later time.
>>
>>7245601
Good job. For the tagline for the first section, maybe say "need something to tackle winter weather or off-road adventures? Try one of these"

for the second section
"Larger SUV's for comfort and towing power, at the expense of fuel economy"


Under the 4Runner, I'm not sure VSC TCS and brake assist were options until the newest models, which might be out of price range. Might want to check on it. Also, only the early V6's were weak. Post 95 had the much more powerful 3.4 V6.
>>
>>7245601
I like it (even though it does imply the explorer is bigger then the cherokee & 4 runner).

I can definitely live with this configuration.
>>
No Comanche alternative/10 would not bang.
>>
>>7245601
also you're going to correct spelling mistakes at some point i hope.
>>
>>7246647
Comanche's don't really exist anymore.

We don't have unicorns on the list either, even though they would provide a viable source of transportation.
>>
>>7246651
Yes, am going to scour the thing for spelling, grammar, and formatting mistakes once the sections all get flushed out

>>7246107
>>7245766
>>7246442
Thank all 3 of you guys for your input, couldn't have done it without you.

Will try and work in a comment somewhere to justify the explorer's position in midsize
>>
File: 1355249978136.png-(500 KB, 2177x2179, RDv0.9.7.5.1.png)
500 KB
500 KB PNG
Alright guys, things are coming along. I give you Rough draft v0.9.7.5.1

Again, this is a major revision, so I am sure I will forget things, but I will try and list everything I can remember.

Changelog:

-New categories!
SUV's split into 2 separate groups, Light/Crossover & Mid/Full Size, creation of a new "Off-Roader" category

-Econoboxes, Coupes, Sedans, Wagons, and Luxury Cars tentatively moved out of "Beta" into "v1.0" status

-SUV & Truck sections have been completely flushed out (with lots of help from the community, thanks to the guys who stayed up with me last night to help round it out!)

-Special Snowflake has been tentatively flushed out, need feedback on choices thus far

-As Fast As Your Dollar Can Go further refined, am still in need of nominations for alternates in that category and feedback on existing choices!!

-First very tentative draft of the Off-Roader category flushed out

-Formatting changes all round, Tagline cells merged with Title Cells to try and compress things with the addition of new categories.

That's all i can remember right now guys

As always, please look it over, tell me what you guys think, and all feedback/input/opinions/thoughts are welcome and appreciated!
>>
>>7246898
>>7246898
>misspelled know-how in "as fast as your dollar can go"
I would also like to nominate any turbo rx7, although not very reliable can be under 9:1 weight/power easily, for under 3k in modifications.
>>
>>7246898
Nomination for Fast as Your Dollar Can Go:
GM G-body from 78-87. Cutlass, Regal, Monte Carlo, Grand Prix or El Camino it can be any of these. I'd say Monte Carlo.

Pros:
Ladder frame for dat stiffness
305 small blocks have low output stock but lots of torque and can be "woken up" with a cam and a less restrictive exhaust. All Chevy small blocks are the same size, so a 350 or 400 will fit with no modifications whatsoever.
Plenty of parts availability since they made the fuckin things for a decade straight and almost everything between the corporate cousins is interchangeable.

Cons:
Stock 7.5 10-bolt rear end is weak, 8.5 10-bolt is good but rare.
TH200 transmissions in early models are absolute shit, 200-4Rs can be good if built properly but an old abused one will likely fail. Fortunately TH350s and TH400s are bolt-in replacements and damn near bulletproof.
Buick 3.8l Turbo is the only engine that makes a decent amount of power stock and there's no way you'll find one of those.
Doesn't handle as well as a Camaro/Firebird

Alternative is Ford Thunderbird.
>>
>>7246898
The GM hd trucks also have low ground clearance, weaker IFS, paint flaking issues and rust issues. 6.5 turbo diesel was a turd.

The Ford HD's of those years get rusty, but thats about it. the 7.3 diesel is Cummins tier reliable and powerful. They also had a solid axle.

In fact you could take GM hd's off completely because 1st gen Rams were pretty damn good. Solid axle, 12 valve Cummins, rust can get to them, but overall great trucks.
>>
>>7246898
For as fast as you money can go, Foxbody Mustangs pretty much need to be on there. Very cheap, shi tton of aftermaket, can pretty much be built to do anything. For cheap, very cheap. For an example a Foxbody Mustang with a turbo 5.3 gm truck engine. Only a few thousand dollars and one of the quickest cars on the strip.

3rd gen Fbodies should be the next choice after Foxbody Mustangs.
>>
>>7247083
>Low ground clearance
Don't need it on a 2wd, and on a 4x4 you can crank the keys for free.
>Weaker IFS
The IFS offers a smooth ride and unless you're absolutely beating the fuck out of it in 4x4 with keys cranked to the sky, the IFS is plenty reliable.
>Rust issues
If you're saying that they'll rust after being taken out on the beach every weekend for 20 years, then yeah. But they certainly didn't have rust issues. They were a lot better than any comparable trucks of the time.
>paint flaking
20 years of direct sun exposure will do that to most vehicles.
>6.5 turbo diesel was a turd.
The 6.5 wasn't designed as a powerhouse, but to achieve better fuel economy. The Big block was GM's powerhouse of the GMT-400 line.
>The Ford HD's of those years get rusty,
The HD's aren't the only trucks being mentioned there. The Diesel Ford HDs are also a lot less common, more expensive, and a lot harder to find parts for.
>1st gen Rams were pretty damn good
Thy rusted to hell, aren't easy to come by, aren't at all comfortable, and the gas/auto trucks were complete shit.
>Solid axle, 12 valve Cummins
To the average Joe, that solid axle is only going to come in handy while in 4x4, and means a rougher ride 100% of the time. And again, there's nothing wrong with the stock IFS if you're not beating it to kingdom come. A 1st gen Cummins is going to be hard to find, pricey, and uncomfortable where as GMT-400s are a dime a dozen and and extremely comfortable.
>>
>>7247229
>denial
>>
>>7247452
Bullshit, and you know it.
>>
>>7247456
Said the GM guy defending the GM trucks.
>>
>>7247465
"He owns a GMC, he must hate all other brands and continually lie about them to make them look bad."
No, try again.

>>7242834
>>7242988
>>7244712
>>
>>7247083

We put the GM C/K up there as a whole since in encompasses a large number of trucks that are good quality, reliable, cheap, and readily available for under $5k.

There are also lots of F250/350's available both in Diesel and gas form.

While the Dodge cummins is a great truck, its pretty much the only good Dodge truck, and finding them for under $5k that are not old or in poor condition is difficult.
>>
>>7247520
>>7247465
>>7247456
>>7247452
>>7247229
>>7247083
Just to weight in, I have done a ton of research into the truck choices (I actually do try and do as much vetting as possible with the feedback people leave), and it would seem like Dodge writes itself out for several reasons

1.)As stated, the only real positive traction I can find is for dodge trucks WITH a Cummins diesel WITH a manual transmission. Of the top, that narrows the field down a lot, in stark contrast to the other options

2.)Price. Once you take into account how marrow the choices are, dodge essentially prices itself out of this chart, with the only real options having a absurd amount of miles or being in terrible condition

Just my 2 cents as a non truck person
>>
File: 1355263570525.jpg-(76 KB, 719x720, 1312667253760.jpg)
76 KB
76 KB JPG
>>7246898

Chart looking good, nice job.

For the Offroader section, I would pair the bronco and K5 together, one as a main and one as an alternate. Like I mentioned ealier, which one as the main might be a tough choice. If I had to choose, I'd probably pick the K5 just because better hardware.

Then I'd put the Samurai as the alternate to the wrangler.

The Land Cruiser up there is somewhat dubious, unless you are talking about the old 40 series. The 80 series you have up there is decent offroad, but its kind of a barge, and I think a stock Cherokee would probably best it.

But I'm not much of an offroad guru, so maybe others should weigh in.

Also, your note "Any of the choices for SUV's and Trucks" should probably exclude the crossovers
>>
>>7247730
Sans the Samurai,maybe replace it with the CUCV pickup and Blazer.
>>
>>7246898
I would like to make a suggestion,

I think since you now have quite a lot of cars listed there, newbies will want to start knowing what those cars look like, So I wouldn't say add on to that chart but possibly make another chart, which references all the cars listed in your original one, and shows a picture or two of them. It wouldn't take too long to do and would be very helpful.
>>
>>7247730
So noted, will rework it around.

What are some Pros/Cons to the K5 so I can flush the categories out more with it as a main choice??

Will revise the SUV and Truck to exclude the smalls/crossovers
>>
>>7247746
good pictures would be ones which show the front and side in one shot and the rear in another.
>>
>>7247739
I dunno, I think the Samurai definitely belongs up there.

Maybe the CUCV could replace the Landcruiser....


>>7247746
I was kind of thinking that would be a good idea, or else, including a wikipedia link for each car might be the best idea.
>>
>>7247746
I will see what I can work up
>>
>>7247758
you're gonna have to ask some K5 owners, or maybe GMC Bur can weigh in.

It'd say dat Chevy component swapability is a big pro though.
>>
>>7247777
>It'd say dat Chevy component swapability is a big pro though.
That it is. Those bodies had been in since 73 I believe, and were used all the way up to 91. Plus you've got the 350, and many stronger components are cheap as dirt and bolt in.

Compare that to the 90 Bronco sitting in my back yard right now with a cracked block.
>>
>>7247763
also, whats the CUCV? because as it stands with how I am reworking it, it opens up a space for one more alternate
>>
>>7247811
On the side of the bronco though, if you want something newer the Bronco is probably better. The post 92 2dr Tahoes are not great offroad machines, while the 92-96 bronco still has a lot of off road prowess.
>>
>>7247823
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUCV

The GM version, not the shitty Dodge.

Basically, its a Military spec Chevy truck that are built tough as fuck. 1 ton axles, 6.2L diesel, tough transfer cases and low range gearing. Also front and rear lockers. They are slow as shit but one hell of a machine.

They can be a tad tricky to find.
>>
File: 1355264940833.jpg-(67 KB, 600x450, cucv.jpg)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>7247823
Also comes in Blazer form.

>>7247830
True.
>>
>>7247844
Thy come in waves. Local used car lot here got 15 of them at once.
>>
>>7247859
>>7247844
Worth including as an alternate to the "build one of the trucks/suvs into an off-roader" category?
>>
>>7247864
Certainly.
>>
>>7247864
Yeah, you could give it the tagline "a pre-built offroad truck courtesy of Uncle Sam"
>>
File: 1355265595043.png-(44 KB, 1089x307, OR_v0.3.png)
44 KB
44 KB PNG
Ok guys, here is how I have the Off-Roaders reworked thus far. kick it around and let me know what you think.
>>
>>7247890
fucking A, looks good man.

Might be worth mentioning the Twin Traction Beam suspension for the Bronco if you need something to say about it. Its a neat system that combines flexibility and ruggedness.
>>
File: 1355267983807.jpg-(59 KB, 600x371, 1988_ford_bronco_ii_14443205.jpg)
59 KB
59 KB JPG
Bronco II's are pretty good for offroad. Basically a short wheel base Ranger SUV. Might be a little tricky finding one though.
>>
>>7248021
I've never heard of it being that popular in off roading circles though, and yeah, sort of limited availability.
>>
>>7247890
Might be worth mentioning that the CUCVs are built to 1 1/4 ton specs.
>>
>>7248021
Limited availability, and extremely prone to roll over, making them a HORRIBLE choice for anyone coming to /o/ for advise.
>>
>>7248037
I think
>built tough as F**k
basically covers that
>>
>>7248031
Because everyone talks about the fullsize Bronco. The B II would be better because its more compact/lightweight, awesome lima 2.3 4cyl (american 22r) and the neat TTB.
>>
>>7248043
pretty much every offroad vehicle is prone to roll over lol
>>
>>7248049
Touche.

>>7248050
There's a reason no one ever talks about the B II. They're trying to forget it existed.
>>
>>7248050
eh, lets see if anyone else agrees on that. I'm not sure if it makes a better contender than the other choices on there.
>>
>>7248056
Just because any off road vehicle can roll over does not mean that they're all equal in the aspect.
>>
File: 1355268867262.png-(513 KB, 2177x2113, RD_v0.9.7.7.3.png)
513 KB
513 KB PNG
Ok guys, again, thanks a million for all the input from you guys who have been helping me out with trucks, SUV's, and off-roaders!

Here is rough Draft v0.9.7.7.3 just let everyone see where we are overall

Changelog:

-Off-Roaders revised to v0.3, strong initial choices in all main and alternate positions written in

-Minor revisions to SUV's (mainly fixing spelling and rewording grammar), revised to v0.7 & 0.9

-Revisions to Fast As Your Dollar Can Go, tentative choices for alternates written in

-Revised intro text up top. Broke into smaller sections to make it easier to read, revised and simplified some language, added in explanation of max mileage, and a general advisory about rust.

As always, all feedback, thoughts, opinions and insights welcome
>>
>>7248078
Looks good. Now should their be a Van category?
Have the Minivans
Then have the Commercial vans
>>
>>7248111
Funny Guy
>>
>>7248111
This fucking guy right here.
>>
>>7248111
I'll start with the Chevrolet Astro

>Pros: Great space and towing abilities for hauling
>Cons: Underpowered V6 with cramped engine compartment; noisy interior
>Common Problems: Transmission problems; rough idle/misfire
>Years & Mileage: 1985-2005; 300,000-100,000
>Honorable Mentions: Chevrolet S-10 - Forefather of the Chevrolet Astro
>>
Work vans

Gm Express, dem veeates

E-series, THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST THE BEST

Sprinter, lol Mercedes

Honorable mention, Ram van because only one left.
>>
>>7249115
>GM Express
Do you even know your vans, faggot?
>>
>>7249135
dyel?
>>
>>7249144
Chevrolet Express
GMC Savanna
>>
Alright guys, burning the oil on editing right now, hope to have version 1.0 up within the hour for you guys to kick around.
>>
>>7249264
faggot
>>
File: 1355284553904.jpg-(136 KB, 1023x682, DSC02882.jpg)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
Lexus SC300/SC400? guys?

why not?
>>
>>7249264
It better come with asbestos, free of charge.
>>
>>7249153
Gm Expranna
>>
>>7249426
Savanness
>>
>>7248865
Might want to add this as a con

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kuSghb7P7U
>>
>>7249492
It can be mentioned, but why not give IIHS ratings to the other vehicles?

Also, I'd rather have a couple broken bones from a wrecked Astro than having that plus losing a leg with a Pontiac Trans Sport.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4mY43LeA6s


If there were 4 sub-levels for each rating, of the IIHS crash tests, the Astro would probably get a P2 (Poor Rating Level 2 (Better)) and the Trans Port a P4 (Poor Rating Level 4 (Worse)).
>>
>>7249643
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaeloWsRe_s
>>
File: 1355288141875.png-(513 KB, 2177x2113, Draftv1.1.png)
513 KB
513 KB PNG
Ok guys here we go, Working Draft v1.1!

Changelog:

-All sections revised to v1.1, with firm choices for primary and alternate vehicles in every category

-Intro paragraphs were further reworked to simplify and condense information

-Minor grammatical and formatting changes to all sections (condensing info, trying to unify structure, and reworking awkward grammar)

I now pronounce thee out of beta

as always, feedback, thoughts, opinions, and input are welcome.
>>
>>7249728

Years for the Civic should be changed - 2000 was the last year it had real suspension up front.
>>
File: 1355288509613.jpg-(161 KB, 638x600, 1325464603948.jpg)
161 KB
161 KB JPG
>>7249728
>Ranger
>Excursion
>Expedition
>Bronco

>Second/honorable mention
>>
>>7249756

Also, 2003+ Crown Vics are the good ones.
>>
>>7249728
Ya dun goofed.

GM C/K common problems should be:
Transmission & rear end on 1500 models, starter

That should also carry directly over to the Suburban. Tahoe/Yukon should just be:
Starter, transmission, rear end

Move squishy brake pedal to cons if it's going to be included, as that's just the way many of them feel. It's not really a problem as it doesn't hurt anything.
>>
>>7249783
sadly, 2002 is the last model year that is really inside the Sub 5K budget of the chart
>>
>>7249783

Also, where's the 89-97 Thunderbird? Only RWD coupe in North America aside from the Corvette with all-wheel independent suspension at the time, and has massive potential.
>>
File: 1355288976134.jpg-(119 KB, 326x284, 1325549381910.jpg)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>7249728
>F250/F350
>7.3 powerstroke era

>Below GM
>>
>>7249785
fixing as we speak
>>
>>7249794

I see plethoras of 2003+ Crown Victorias for less than 5k. No point suggesting an inferior vehicle when it's not really that much more to get a better one. The suspension on the 02 Crown Vic is essentially the same as it was in 1979. 2003 was a massive improvement.
>>
File: 1355289136625.png-(118 KB, 605x328, 1325462882127.png)
118 KB
118 KB PNG
>>7249794
>2003+ Crown Vics
>$5000+

Maybe if you live in yurop
>>
>>7249764
>>7249810
>>7249826
Troll, in case you couldn't tell.
>>
>>7249826
give me a sec, will research, possible I just fucked up writing down the years when I was looking stuff up.
>>
>>7249819
Whoops, had it down as 05 in data, my fuck up on copying it over wrong, but upon looking again, it looks like 06 falls into the budget as well, so I will amend it
>>
>>7249756
not sure that most people buying a civic will care?

>>7249807
sorry sir, didn't make the cut

>>7249838
I could tell, with as much vetting as I had to do on the truck and SUV section, I actually feel really solid about it
>>
File: 1355290494460.jpg-(172 KB, 720x720, 1325557233558.jpg)
172 KB
172 KB JPG
>>7249838
>>7249906

autism
>>
I love how obvious the trolls are when they show up. They think everyone cares about their 12 year old autism bullshit.
>>
>>7250000
Quaded for truth.
>>
File: 1355291972869.jpg-(57 KB, 450x304, 1325451280890.jpg)
57 KB
57 KB JPG
>>7250000
>implying the Fords aren't the obvious better choice

Oh no, I have to change the spark plugs every 60,000 miles on my modular v8
Oh no, I have a burnt out window motor
Oh no, my truck was recalled years ago to have a fusible link installed
Oh no, my truck doesn't ride comfortably because of that big solid axle out front.

Obviously much worse than changing out axles seals at 40,000 miles, replacing transmissions every 100K miles, dealing with 6.5 turbo diesels and broken tie rods. Also better to have your truck snap in half going over a speed bump too than to hold together for hundreds of thousand of miles.
>>
>>7250000
dat
quads
>>
>>7249365
Yeah, I was kind of thinking this could go in Special Snowflakes
>>
>>7250209
>>7249365
which would you purpose it replace?
>>
>>7250225
Well, before you had an empty space there, but now its all full up with pretty good choices.


Looking over at coupes, I'd say you should replace the CLK320 with the SC300/400. A quick scan of my local craigslist shows way more SC's available for under $5k.

Perhaps we should get some second opinions on that though.
>>
>>7249906

How'd it not make the cut? Certainly better than the other special snowflakes, and I'd honestly put it above a Mustang for an affordable sports coupe. Good examples of Super Coupes with manuals can be had within budget, and they'll outhandle any Mustang.
>>
>>7250354
Just don't bother, disagreeing with them makes you a troll.
>>
>>7250343
Will consider it, will do some research into how available both are, and what pricing looks like. What bugs me about the CLk is that its a great car, but it is a very limited spread that fits the budget, I wouldn't be opposed to switching it to something that had a broader model range in the budget

>>7250354
>>7250474
the mustang didn't make it on the list for handling, it made it for how widely available it is, how cheap to buy, own and operate it is, and for coming in a ton of different configurations over a variety of model years and having a almost endlessly expansive and cheap aftermarket. Its more than just what car is faster, its about all aspects of the car as a DD or first time buyer/drivers car

I certainly don't see it being off the wall enough to displace any of the cars in the snowflake category right now (as that section is simply for unconventional choices), and all the cars in the sports car section at present have strong cases to be there.

I'd be happy to consider it, but you will have to make a strong case for it than "can out turn a mustang". what car would you have it replace, and why? pros? cons? reliability?


>>7250474
Plenty of disagreement has taken place in this thread haha, it hardly makes you a troll, but if you want to put a car forward, you are going to have to make a real case, not just say "I think this is better than that because opinion"
>>
File: 1355304300149.png-(513 KB, 2177x2113, Draft_v1.2.png)
513 KB
513 KB PNG
OK guys, my last post for the night before heading to bed

Draft v1.2

Changelog:

-Decided after further review of autotrader/craigslist/carsforsale/kbb/edmunds that I was being a bit conservative on "in budget" model years for certain cars.

Pretty much every section had at least one vehicle who's model year range was expanded to reflect the pricing rethink

Toss it around, tell me what you think. I am tired as hell so its very possible mistakes were made

As always, thoughts, comments, ideas, and inputs welcome. Catch you guys in the morning
>>
>>7250945
Fuck, I'd say we are getting close to damn near perfect.

Though I was sort of thinking.....

It might be good to have a section for large cars and land yatchs. Certainly there are some good examples out there, like the Ford Panther Platform (crown vic, Marquis, Town car), GM G-Body, and perhaps some GM 3800 powered monsters, and maybe even the Taurus SHO.

Just something to think about and toss around.
>>
>>7250945
Make it linear instead of a box?
as in jsut scroll down, none of that sideways shit.

Also E30's aren't for special snowflakes ;_;
>>
>>7251060
i second this..its kinda hard to read on smaller monitors (laptop)
>>
>>7251039
Will think about it, but I am likely going to have to make an executive decision to cap it at 12 categories.

I was afraid that making it 10 would be too big when i started, and I think a dozen is a good solid round number to cap things at if we can get this guy polished up to top of the page form

>>7251060
>>7251154
Will try reworking in into linear form this morning
>>
>>7250612

I'd say replace the E30 with it.

>1989-1995 Ford Thunderbird SC

Excellent handling and ride quality, superb 3.8L supercharged and intercooled engine, only RWD domestic aside the Corvette to have independent suspension all around at the time. Motor Trends 1989 Car of the Year, 210hp and 315lb-ft of torque, or 230/330 respectively for 94 and 95. Lots of potential for both speed and handling prowess.
Cons, looks like an early 90's Crown Vic up front for the early models, later ones differ a bit, but still have CV influences.
Common problems would be headgaskets, can't think of anything else though.
>>
>>7251446
Anyone else have a thought on this? And it up to 2K to get repaired if the head gaskets blow? I could merge the E30 with the E36 in the coupes section and just break them apart by generation if people think the Thunderbird is a better fit for special snowflake.
>>
>>7251560
Rockauto has the HG for e30's from $30-$150+, more expensive ones being a full valvetrain rebuild kits etc.
Looks like price gouging from mechanics too me.
>>
>>7250116
>replacing transmissions every 100K miles
If you're talking about HD trucks the 4L80-E is generally going to be far more reliable than any auto in a Ford, and even the weak like 4L60-Es in the 1500s are usually good for 175-250k.

>dealing with 6.5 turbo diesels and broken tie rods.
If taken care of, there's nothing wrong with the 6.5s. As mentioned, they're generally looked down upon because they can't compete with the power of the 7.3 or Cummins, but that's because they were never designed to.

>Also better to have your truck snap in half going over a speed bump too than to hold together for hundreds of thousand of miles.
Exactly, which is why you'd be better off with a GM than a Ford that's rusted so bad it might snap in half sitting still.
>>
>>7250945
I have some thoughts on the As Fast as you Dollar can go section.

Under the trans am, you have bad v8 gas milage listed as a con. Now your year range covers third gens and fourth gens. I imagine the 3rd gens get terrible gas milage, but both the LT1 and LS1 v8 will get exceptional highway milage when paired with the 6 speed. (high 20s MPGs and occasionally low 30s if it has been maintained properly).

You'r cons for the Camaro only apply to the 88-92 third gen models, yet '00-'02 were not available with a 305. LS1 v8s are pretty common with manual transmissions. I suggest merging the later years with the trans-am section (call it Trans-Am/Z28 or SS or something), as they are esentially the same car.

Personally I think having two of the three columns as F-Bodies just makes the whole thing partial to GM. I'd personally like to see 4th Gen F-Bodies as one column, and 3rd gen as an alternative to something else.
>>
>>7250945

My eyes kind of hurt but thank you for this.
>>
>>7251560

Is this a general guide, or an enthusiast one? I could have new headgaskets on a supercharged 3.8L in a matter of only a few hours, but shops will gouge. Once they're replaced with quality head gaskets, they're fine, but the problem was the OEM headgaskets, as well as the ones that Ford supplied to replace them, which were exactly the same. Get some high quality multi-layer steel head gaskets on there, and it wouldn't give you another problem (most people who have cared-for SC's have done this already).
>>
>>7252418

Another common problem would be transmission slippage if it's an automatic model. The transmissions themselves are good, but only if they have their regular service intervals followed.
>>
>>7250945

What's the point in having both the Prelude and the GS-R? With the Prelude being capable of doing everything the GS-R can do and more, all while costing less because it doesn't have the rarity tax, really no point for the GS-R...
>>
>>7251039
G-bodies are midsize, not really a "large car" in comparison to a Caprice or Crown Vic. A landbarge section would be kinda cool though.
>>
>>7252665
They are larger than most of the other cars on the list though, besides a couple of the lux cars
>>
>>7252674
Have you ever seen one in person? I had an 86 El Camino. They're not that big.
>>
>>7251639

>GM trans better than Ford trans

I think you got Ford transmissions mixed up. Its the transverse transmissions that Ford has problems with. Especially the early ones.

>Nothing wrong with 6.5's

Yeah except valvetrain issues and those crank pins for the harmonic balancer breaking. Also lack of power. Competition has more, and was more reliable at the same time.

>Implying that last one was about GMs, and not Toyotas with major frame rot and body rot issues.

But if you want to play that way the S10s and S15s had issues with frame cracking near the front on 4x4 models.
>>
OK guys, just in from work, will go through all the new feedback and comment/reply in turn, thanks in advance for all the input!
>>
>>7251583
>>7252418
Was talking about the head gaskets on the Ford Thunderbird, and this is a general guide, so shop prices for fixing certain issues DO have to be considered since this is a guide for automotive novices, and I am not making the assumption that everyone reading it can/will want to do service work themselves.
>>
>>7252450
In this area at least, the Prelude is far harder to get your hands on and suffers far more from being inflated in price than the Acura

GS-R also has an incredible reliability record when left stock, which gives it an extremely low cost of ownership to someone on a budget
>>
>>7251941
Interesting. going to have to dissect this a little more, seems like there is a lot fo good info in here
>>
>>7252905

Provided it's been taken care of, which the guide covers what to look for when buying a used car so it should be, the headgaskets will've been replaced with proper ones. Gotta remember that with a $5000 budget, you won't be getting a car from the early 90's in bad shape.
>>
Where can you find these TDI?

I've never seen a running TDI for under $8k.
>>
>>7252974
http://www.carsforsale.com/find_a_vehicle/advancedsearch.aspx?make=Volkswagen&model=Jetta&lo
cation=&zip=&fromyear=-1&toyear=-1&radius=100&fromprice=2000&toprice=5000&am
p;po=0&bs=-1&fueltypeid=2&pordby=year&cursort=desc&bt=-1&ordby=year&curp
age=1

And several are on CL within a 25 mile range of me
>>
>>7252915

Really? Preludes are a dime a dozen here, and GS-R's are something you only see once in a blue moon.

Regardless, they're two cars that fill almost the exact same spot in the market; sporty FWD 2+2 coupes, and they both have comparable performance.

Also, Pros and Cons at the bottom center are backwards.
>>
>>7253013
For which car?
>>
>>7253013
Also, I wouldn't be opposed to switching them if people think that the Prelude is more common overall than the GS-R
>>
File: 1355354981657.jpg-(51 KB, 720x540, 403087_10150614934292487_(...).jpg)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>7252919
No rush, I realize this is a huge project and I don't want to open up another discussion while there is already one going on.

I also don't want to give advice on something I don't have experience with, but I do have a lot of experience with 4th gen F-bodies, and a bit of experience with 3rd gens. When it gets to that point I'll do my best to help out.

>>7253013
I find this is an issue with a North America wide guide, prices and rarity of given models vary greatly by location. For that reason it never hurts to have two similar models (that's the most advice I can give on the subject though).
>>
>>7253064

without a doubt. I've seen a few real GS-R tegs around here, most of them are clones with swap or just an ls engine and gsr tranny

Prelude is much more common, atleast in CT
>>
>>7253105
I agree, I think the Prelude and GS-R make a great pairing, I am going to rework them into the same column, still open to suggestions on which one people think is ore available in general
>>
>>7253105
Also, if you were going rework the Fast As You can Go section, what would your three top picks and 3 alternate picks be?
>>
>>7253001
>http://www.carsforsale.com/find_a_vehicle/advancedsearch.aspx?make=Volkswagen&model=Jetta&am
p;lo
>cation=&zip=&fromyear=-1&toyear=-1&radius=100&fromprice=2000&toprice=500
0&am
>p;po=0&bs=-1&fueltypeid=2&pordby=year&cursort=desc&bt=-1&ordby=year&
curp
>age=1


There are 2 in my area. One has no picture and the other is a Beetle.

On CL, I found one with 270,000 on it, one with a crank issue, and one with bad break electronics.

If anyone wants to find me great deal in the MA/RI area, particularly something Euopean or a Subaru, for under $5k
>>
>>7253144
Well to be honest, I don't want to go with just my picks. I don't have enough experiance to give a sudgestion that isn't partial to GM (so I'm looking for someone to chip in).

That being said:
4th gen f-body (1993-2002 Trans-Am or Camaro Z28) Alternate could be the 88-92 third gens you have listed.

Keep the mustang column the way it is.

The third column I'm open to sudgestions on. Maybe bump up either the corvette or the fox body. I'm leaning more towards the fox body, but I don't know enough about them. Plus that would open up a gap in the alternatives row (It'd personally look ugly to me if you threw GM G-Body under the mustang).

If I absolutely needed to come up with something right now:
Corvette as listed | Cobra | 4th gen f-body
GM G-body | Fox body | 3rd gen
>>
>>7253124

Why not rework them into the same vehicle space itself, or do that with the Accord Coupe and the Prelude, considering they're the same car.
>>
>>7253228
Right now I switched the, with the Prelude as the "top" pick and the GS-R as the alternate. What other car would you put forward as an alternate if I combine them together?
>>
>>7253241

Main thing I don't understand is why they're both under Sports Cars, when they should be under coupes. I don't think the CLK should even be an option, and 3 vehicles in the sports car category aren't even sports cars.
>>
>>7253373
CLK and the Lexus offers the next best luxury alternative to the BMW

The coupes category was meant to be more conservative, along the lines of people who didn;t want to get sedan.

"Sports" cars is directed more towards people who want something fun to drive, or something that has potential as a "starter" car for the slightly more ambitious who want to get into aftermarket mods

but basically it's cars that are fun to drive/own while being affordable to someone on a budget, practicality be damned, and I think the cars in it fit that specification
>>
>>7253396
If it makes people happy I will rename it Sports Cars & Fun Cars...or something lol
>>
>>7253202
Why not
3rd Gen F-body | Cobra | 4th gen F-body
78-87 G-body | Fox Body | Corvette

Since a G-body is closer to a Turdgen than a Corvette.
>>
>>7253515
I would think grouping the 3rd an 4th gen F-bodies together would be the most logical no?
>>
>>7253624
Also does Dodge not have anything that would fit this category?
>>
File: 1355362499074.png-(66 KB, 323x338, 1331773264199.png)
66 KB
66 KB PNG
>>7253515
>>7253624
Tough decision. I like that configuration, simply because a $5K corvette probably isn't going to be much, recommending a 3rd gen over a corvette for a low budget high power project is a good move. The only problem I have with it is that we now have F-Bodies consuming 2/3 main categories. Then on the other hand, pic related, maybe that's fine.
>>
>>7253702
what would the pros/cons, for the 4th gen F-body be?
>>
>>7253678
Ideally, I'd like two put a dodge in there so that the three American companies are fairly represented. Nothing pops into mind though that meets the requirements.
>>
>>7253712
Pros: Godly LS1 (98-02), exceptional performance from the LT1 (93-97), surprising highway MPGs when paired with 6 speed manual, great aftermarket for bolt on power adders (easy to bolt on extra power)

Cons: 6-speeds VERY hard to find in decent shape (within the budget), engine bay cramped (much harder to work on then 3rd gens), optispark issues on early LT1s (especially the '93, (but 94-95s can have problems too, the final revision was made in '96 I believe)).

you could also mention some of the smaller things, like the power window motors slowly becoming ungodly slow, but that itsn't nessecary. Lots of people comment on the cheap plastic interior, but I personally don't find it worse then anything else on the road.

That should get you started anyway, lol, I'll let you refine it and thin it out.
>>
>>7253772
thank you sir!
>>
>>7253772
Maybe move the optispark thing to the common problems section. Keep headlamp motor there but throw a (firebird/trans-am) tag with it.
Then just drop the 2000-2002 year from our new 3rd gen column, and adjust the titles to reflect both the trans-am and camaro z28 in each category (you could say iroc z28/trans am for third gen, and z28 or ss/trans-am, or just call them v8 3rd&4th gen F-Bodies, your call).

Then you're pretty much done as long as nobody wants to throw in a Chrysler product.
>>
>>7253799
No problem at all! Glad I could help!
>>
File: 1355364722958.png-(45 KB, 1089x305, FDG_v1.3.png)
45 KB
45 KB PNG
>>7253810
How does this look? its very possible I tripped over myself a ton trying to shift things around. Let me know what you guys think?
>>
>>7253882
>CLK
no
http://youtu.be/f-Yg3aeh138?t=4m53s
they're fucking horrible...i dont even know why you have mercs on this list, they're all money pits.
>>
>>7253912
As someone who's family has owned more than a dozen, and who owns 2 himself, they actually aren't. They certainly can be, if you buy one that was poorly maintained, or you only get them serviced through a dealership or some scammy "imports" garage, but the idea that they are all money pits is just something that people who have never owned one repeat to other people because someone somewhere bought a lemon and dumped a ton of money into it and bitched about it to anyone who would listen
>>
>>7253882
Looks pretty good to me.
Maybe drop the convertible part in favour of 'good highway MPGs', they do get 30 MPGs out of a powerful v8 after all.

replace either the boy-racer part or interior part with 'engine bay very cramped'

drop lock cylinder and use the added space to add '(early LT1s)' next to Optispark issues.

Of course all three of those are just me being picky, feel free to use your own discretion.

Oh, you could add "early models made very low power stock" to the cons section of the 3rd gens, since you don't really need the "In 3rd den" there. You could reword it as "350 is automatic only, 5 speed 305s are rare". I say this because without modifications, early 3rd gens were murdered by emissions requirements (making something like 150 HP from the 305), this greatly improved later in the generation though.
>>
>>7253912
As a former CLK owner, I agree. Build quality is horrible and parts/repairs are ridiculously expensive.

If you absolutely must include a MB, it has to be a pre-'98 (before the Chrysler merger), anything after is pure shit.
>>
>>7253932
will do, as always, my thanks for the input
>>
>>7253882
I still think 3rd gen fbodies should be after foxbodies. Foxbody just cant be beat for its simplicity, cheapness and massive aftermarket.
>>
>>7253930
jeez, i have the complete opposite story. well whatever.
>>
>>7253989
Did you actually own a CLK? If yes, what went wrong? where did you get it serviced? what was the cost? did you buy it new, or did you buy it used? what condition was it in when you got it?

>>7253976
same question to you good sir
>>
My suggestion of Lexus SC > CLK still stands
>>
>>7254027
I added the SC in with the CLK to have them both as alternates, because I think they are both solid options. It will be in the next whole chart posting
>>
File: 1355366928030.png-(559 KB, 1090x4247, Draft_v1.3.png)
559 KB
559 KB PNG
Ok, working Draft v1.3

Changelog:

-Reworked layout as one long column so it would be easier to read on laptops and such

-Overhaul to Fast As Your Dollar Can Go and Special Snowflake sections

-Lexus SC 300/400 added alongside CLK as alternate in Coupes

As always, input, feedback, thoughts, and opinions welcome

kick it around tell me what you think guys
>>
>>7254097
I like it, super easy to scroll through now!
>>
>>7254097
>Lexus SC 300/400 added alongside CLK as alternate in Coupes

my sister owe you blowjobs!
>>
>>7254097

As fast as your dollar can go section looks excellent, and its way easier to read!

Looks good to me!
>>
File: 1355368050989.jpg-(152 KB, 1024x768, clk.jpg)
152 KB
152 KB JPG
>>7254010
I'm the one that bad-mouthed the car.

>what went wrong?
From 33k miles (when I bought the car) to 75k miles, it was pretty good, only real problems were almost constantly blowing exterior bulbs. From 75k onward more expensive issues started occurring. In order of occurrence: CD changer stopped working, windows would occasionally not respond, both front seats either didn't work or worked incorrectly, radio LCD display broke, A/C fan stopped responding, ABS/TC would occasionally kick on for no reason (pulls all power). That's all I can think of right now, though I believe there's more I'm missing. Sold the car at 150k miles. Some other cosmetic issues occurred in this time as well, such as the headlights yellowing, interior trim pieces breaking, buttons falling off, etc.

>where did you get it serviced?
Originally the local MB dealer, but that quickly became too expensive. Then went to local independent German repair shop (specialized in Audi, BMW, MB, Porsche, etc.), was pretty impressed with service, but the cost was still pretty high. Never took it to backwoods shade-tree mechanics or anyplace sketchy.

>what was the cost?
Basic repairs were a few hundred (at least), bigger stuff up to/around $1000.

>did you buy it new, or did you buy it used?
Used

>what condition was it in when you got it?
Very Good. Bought it from a MB dealer, 2nd owner. Only issue at the time (33k miles) were the brake pads needed to be changed. Like I said, up to 75k it was almost trouble-free.
>>
>>7254193
I'll look into it some more good sir
>>
>>7254508
>>7254508
>>7254508

>good sir

this isn't reddit, you faggot.
>>
>>7254690
>>7254690
>>7254690

>Knowing how people on reddit address each other

Go back to reddit, you faggot.
>>
>>7254701
>>7254701
>>7254701
>>7254701

>using a tripcode


go back to reddit you faggot
>>
Consumer reports actually ranks the CLK in there top 10 picks for used luxury cars 5K or under(and the new models are a top 10 pick for 10K an under). Its a 5 star car on Edmund, 8.5 out of 10 on KBB, no major recalls or service snags that I can find.

The last remark in the blurb about the CLK on the chart is that it CAN be expensive to own, which I think is fair to say. If anyone else has any feedback about it, I'd love to hear it, but it's looking like a pretty solid choice.
>>
File: 1355376821284.jpg-(60 KB, 410x280, 1340567626652.jpg)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>7254800
>consumer reports
>>
>>7254944

>Implying a positive review in consumer reports is somehow a bad thing
>>
>>7254980
>implying consumer reports is credible anymore
>>
>>7254987

>Implying it isn't
>>
>>7253882
Might want to add (Camaro and Firebird/Trans Am) after "F-bodies" since this list is for n00bs.
>>
>>7254995
>implying it is
>>
>>7255021

In terms of tracking and compiling the amount of reported issues with a car, its valid. In terms of their actual reviews of cars, take it or leave it, cars aren't their main area of focus

>>7255003
Will Do
>>
>>7255032
>perceived reliability
"Its a a Toyota, its very reliable, and grounded to the ground!"
"I only had it for 6 hours and didn't bother reading the owners manual and I cant figure this touch screen nonsense! This car is CRAP!"

Go to a independent repair shop and get to know on of the technicians whose been there a while, he can tell you whats up. Like Toyotas are easy to work on, Taurus and GM minivan rear coils breaking, how much shit it takes to change a thermostat in a Chrysler 2.7 v6 and so on.
>>
>>7255051
>>7255051
>>7255051

Yea ford got hammered for SYNC, it took their ratings down, when in reality they are still damn reliable and deserving of the old rank. just read the god-damned manual.
>>
>>7255051
>>7255057
Again, I am not talking about the objective rating, I am talking about the statistical tracking of the amount of reported repairs
>>
>>7254097
>all be it
you mean albeit?
>>
>>7255057
Its not even Ford anymore. GM and Chrysler also took hits. Still haven't heard anything about Hyundai's or Toyota's systems yet, which both use Microsoft, which is the same thing Ford has been using for years now. I think Chrysler uses the Microsoft system as well. But yeah thats my point.
>>
>>7255074
fixed
>>
>>7254725
>>7254725
>>7254725
>>7254725

>Not taking responsibility for your posts

Go back to /b/ you faggot.
>>
>>7255066
What sort of repairs?
Like all new vehicles having recall work?
Warranty work?
Maintenance work?
High mileage/outside warranty work?
>>
>>7255105
Warranty work, when they were new, and non-standard maintenance work once out of warranty (in other words repair work on things that have broken). If you take a look at both, and what most of the issues were, and how often they occurred/were reported you can get a pretty damn good handle on how reliable a car is

And yes, it does keep track of recalls, although its rarely anything of note on newer cars, and you don;t need consumer reports to look up recall notices
>>
>>7255118
K then.
The GM 3800s. They had a problem with the intake gasket going out. Gm issued a TSB and introduced a new gasket. Repair work is done and problem resolved. Would that mark down the reliability rating?
>>
>>7255151
>>7255151
I would, for the reason that it's an outstanding issue, and there is no promise that a sub 5K car has even had the work done to start with.

I actually brought this point up when the Ford Thunderbird SC was put forward to go on on the list. Has widely reported head gasket problems. Yes, a new gasket was designed, and if the car has been refitted, its no big deal, but if it hasn't, its an almost 2 grand repair.

This guide is designed with car NOVICES and people with LIMITED BUDGETS in mind, someone who has no idea what they are looking at, or the money to address an expensive problem after the fact doesn't need to be looking at cars they may or may not have had an issue taken care of. even more so if there exist options of equal quality that don't have said issues.

That same issue, if you are a car person and capable of doing the work yourself/know what to look for to start with, gets completely flipped around. You have to keep in mind this charts target audience.
>>
>>7255188
A P.S. to that post.

My family has been involved in the used car business for many years, and when I was younger I was heavily involved in it myself. You would be AMAZED at the amount of cars that never had warranty/recall/or standard service work done to them EVER simply because people were to ignorant, to poor, or to lazy to do anything about it.

Thats why you have to take a look at the entire scope of whats up with a car in a chart like this, and what as made selecting cars such a daunting task.
>>
>>7255188
Thats the point i'm getting at. If there is a fix and the problem is gone then there really isn't a problem then. The 3800 is known for being the toughest v6 ever made.

Now the Ford Taurus, like the one you have on the list for a Wagon, they have bad automatic transmissions, there is no fix. Just rebuild or swap in a new one. The Honda Odysseys have the same problem, bad automatic. No fix, just rebuild or replace. That is unreliability.

And repair cost is just part of life for owning a vehicle. If you cant afford to have your car fixed for when it does break down then maybe you should reconsider your financial setup or even owning a vehicle.
>>
>>7255236
And my counter point to you is that a novice used car buys has no way off assessing if the "fix" has been done or not, and unless they they pay to have a car inspected, or have someone car savvy enough to know for them, its still an issue they have to consider when buying a car
>>
>>7255242
Good time for them to learn about it then. Otherwise they become another fucking moron who is surprised that coolant turns to acid in 5 years.
>>
>>7255275
Haha that IS one way to look at it, but sadly I am not here to be the automotive prophet to the masses my friend.
>>
>>7255275
LPG has a good point though, not everyone can tell if critical problems have been solved, and if the car is out of warranty, as most sub 5k cars are, then the new owner will be SOL if one of these common problems occurs.

It's not like you can always expect the previous owners to know, of be honest about, what problems have been resolved with the cars.
>>
File: 1355385394394.png-(638 KB, 1281x4359, Draft_v1.4.png)
638 KB
638 KB PNG
Newest update, v1.4

-Made things wider so I could bump the font up and make things easier to see

-Minor changes to the front end text, and new additions to the back end text

-Small formatting changes all round
>>
>>7255504
common issues with jeep cherokee is cooling issues. i swear on my mums life
>>
>>7255602
>but do we need the mileage? It seems unnecessary.

I think so. for some cars over 150k miles and you are looking at trouble. Others, like a Honda Civic for example, 200k is nothing at all.

For newbies, it can help guide a little when it comes to what mileage is ok, and what mileage is too much, for certain cars
>>
File: 1355407412094.jpg-(162 KB, 1024x768, SAM_0156.jpg)
162 KB
162 KB JPG
>>
File: 1355407468483.jpg-(151 KB, 1024x768, SAM_0155.jpg)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
>>7256348
>>
File: 1355407553276.jpg-(94 KB, 1024x768, SAM_0157.jpg)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>>7256350
>>
File: 1355407641314.jpg-(151 KB, 1024x768, SAM_0158.jpg)
151 KB
151 KB JPG
>>7256355
>>
File: 1355407699391.jpg-(67 KB, 800x600, sc12.jpg)
67 KB
67 KB JPG
>>7256357
>>
File: 1355407962203.jpg-(416 KB, 1000x667, Copy of 6898177354_473f14(...).jpg)
416 KB
416 KB JPG
>>7256360
>>
File: 1355408305671.jpg-(87 KB, 800x600, tanab008.jpg)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>7256369
>>
File: 1355408418091.jpg-(113 KB, 764x483, b6ff0b76.jpg)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
>>7256379
>>
File: 1355408470852.jpg-(128 KB, 800x600, imag0311a.jpg)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>7256384
>>
File: 1355408521622.jpg-(90 KB, 1024x768, 413964_10150696939466749_(...).jpg)
90 KB
90 KB JPG
>>7256387
>>
File: 1355409160969.jpg-(40 KB, 479x360, de66eb14cc37.jpg)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>7256388
>>
I've posted before about this, but didn't get any responses.

I need so some suggestions for a car /o/

I like European car, because they just feel designed and more complete. Perhaps it is because the Cabrio is tiny, but they are hard to work on because everything is so....crammed. But I dislike a lot of Japanese and American car because they have the the WORST interiors or any car. My best friend has had 2 Civic and I hated getting in his car, because the interior was plastic,rubber, and basic features galore. The seat belts stopped working, the door doesn't close right, and it is incredibly uncomfortable. Same for some American cars like the Focus and Chevy Aveo.


Basically I want something small and economical that can fit 4 people comfortably like a Golf, that is reliable and relatively easy to work on, something with a nice interior even on more basic models, and has a decent amount of power, yet doesn't gets above the 20 miles to the gallon, as well as being decent in rain and a bit of snow. Most importantly, it has to be something I'll love.

So what should I be looking at?
I like the the MA/RI area
>>
>>7256593
>>7256593
budget?
>>
>>7256630

I am looking to stay under $3500ish in general. So I have money in case something goes wrong.I plan on put more $$$ into it when I finish parting my old car out.

I'll go to up $5k if it is a TDI. Generally slide price on fuel economy
>>
Going to try and tighten up the wording in the two concluding paragraphs today, and do another major check over for grammar and such.

As always feedback on the latest update is welcome!
>>
>>7256593
do you car what type of car?
>>
>>7256800

Sorry, I am a bit burnt out from writing term papers.

I had a Cabrio, but the transmission is gone and it could use a new CC. And I am looking for any type, as long as it meets those qualifications.

I meant over 20 mpg BTW.
>>
>>7256830
An Impreza would do everything you are asking for, but it is Japanese.

If you wanted to stay Euro, look for an AWD version of either the Mercedes E class (sedan or wagon), or the Volvo wagon
>>
> yes
>>
>>7256837

How is the interior on them? I am actually looking at one tomorrow. They are incredibly hard to come by around here as well.

It doesn't need to be AWD either, but not awful in a cold climate.

I've been looking at some Saab's, what are /o/'s thought on them? The only thing is the gas mileage is pretty bad in most of them.
>>
File: 1355423429242.png-(667 KB, 1409x4399, Draft_v1.5.png)
667 KB
667 KB PNG
OK guys, Working Draft v1.5

-Revised intro and concluding text some more in an effort to tighten things up.

-More minor formatting changes in hopes of making it easier to read

Kick it around, tell me what you think
>>
>>7256945
The pros/cons in the special snowflakes area are backwards.
Other than that, looks good!
>>
>>7256983
fixed, and thank you.
>>
>>7256998

Looks good to me.
>>
Where does the Mazda Protoge stand in price, reliance, fuel consumption, and cost of/maintanence?
>>
>>7257348
Gah proofreading! Looking to have an actual final draft candidate for people to look over tonight
>>
>>7256593
>>7256661

yeah, maybe you should buy a golf, or a jetta
>>
>>7257794
LPG, what do you do for a living? You must have an awful lot of free time, or else you are just really dedicated.


Either way, thank you.
>>
>>7257819
Computer Science grad student(I'm 25). I teach intro level computer classes for the university right now and do some freelance IT work on the side.

And I just like having a project, something I *want* to do vs something I have to do.

And your welcome, I hope the community can get some good use out of this chart when it's done.
>>
>>7257837
>I hope the community can get some good use out of this chart when it's done.

some of them will probably argue like mad autists about it, but I think you've created a pretty solid and complete package here
>>
>>7257850
Haha yeah, I am debating with myself right now about creating a separate thread for the first final draft candidate, just so I can get more input and so the pic doesn't get pushed off the top by new posts, but I am afraid it will just turn into a shit storm of arguing
>>
>>7257875
well, you guys have been building this thing for a week. they had their chance to input
>>
>TDI Golf cons:
>no cd player
>no auto
I just stopped reading this thread. Fuckin Americans.

protip1: l2manual (besides, autos are less reliable in VWs
protip2: you can change the headunit, please don't choose your car based on it.
>>
>>7258143
Just kidding actually, it's looking good and i'm being a faggot because I like my TDI Golf. But please consider everyone isn't from USA.
>>
>>7258143

Also, probably should wait for the GTD.
>>
>>7258143
>>7258154
Again, this is a thread for automotive novices, for cars available for 5K and under. Some people ARE going to care it has no CD player

>>7258153
That's why this chart clearly says "American Version" at the top
>>
>>7258159
Oh wow, what the fuck! Really didn't see that at all.. I'll just gtfo now.
>>
File: 1355449549799.png-(668 KB, 1409x4399, RC1.png)
668 KB
668 KB PNG
OK guys, here we go, Release Candidate 1

Changes from the last revision are all formatting and grammar related. Continued to clean up spelling, sloppy grammar, unify structure, and rework awkward phrasing or formatting mistakes.

Please, run your eyes over it, tell me what you think, point out anything my tired eyes have missed, and as always, feedback is welcome.


If people think this looks pretty clean I may post it in its own thread to the board later to get more input, otherwise I may hold of till RC2 to open that can of worms.

Enjoy!
>>
>>7258303
Holy mother of God.
That's one hell of a list.
>>
>>7258303
im not trying to be a troll/pest, but i think the mileage and years row should be above the pros rows!

reason being flow
- gm tahoe, 1990-2002, pros, cons, alternates.

just my opinion.
>>
File: 1355450527996.jpg-(263 KB, 800x600, sc15.jpg)
263 KB
263 KB JPG
>>7258303
>>7258303
im not trying to be a troll/pest, but i think the mileage and years row should be above the pros rows!

reason being flow
- gm tahoe, 1990-2002, pros, cons, alternates.

just my opinion.
>>
>>7258336
No man, I welcome the feedback.

That's an easy rework if other people think it would read better that way.
>>
>>7258349
>>7258340

Interesting thought! It would definitely flow better if we had year up top
>>
>>7258143
Actually, I still came back to nag because I started thinking, this implies that the civic and corolla have cd player as standard? I'd be surprised if the early corollas even had radios at all...
>>
>no hatchback category

pfffffhahahaha what a failure
>>
>>7258524
you're right.

hatchbacks are desired by younger people.
>>
>>7258562
>Hatchbacks are desired by gays and women

Fixed.
>>
>>7258579
Firebirds are hatch backs lol
>>
You should remove TDIs. It is very difficult to find diesels in America especially under $5000. Until recently, diesels were special request at dealerships.

It is just confusing because It is curious if you'd place a gasoline Golf in the Econbox category or a non diesel Jetta against the Accord
>>
>>7258863
or make a diesel sections under 'ecobox'
>>
>>7258562
there is one a hatchback section...honda civics and VW
>>
>>7255504

Sup man? If I may ask what program are you using to do this sticky? I have to do a sticky myself and I thought if you could help me out. Are you just using Excel?
>>
>>7255504

>check for rust INSIDE the engine bay, also the interior and trunk for smells
>allot on the last line should be "a lot"
>>
>>7260092
buy a lexus
>>
can we put something like "if you're gonna ask for help/diagnosis/how to include your make/model/year/engine/relevent_other_stuff in your post" because we can't help you very much if you don't
>>
What is /o/'s thoughts on Saabs?

They seem to be decently quick, well built, and generally nice car. But then 9-3 seems to get pretty poor gas mileage.
>>
>>7258458
You have to look at year to year comparison. A 96 Civic likely would have a CD player, so it is notable that a 96 Golf wouldn't

>>7258429
I am going to try and rework it sometime today in this fashion. Have to proctor a bunch of final exams today so it might not be till later

>>7258524
>>7258562
>>7258579
>>7258812
There are hatchbacks on the list, and I don;t think there are enough models in this price point that would justify their own category

>>7258863
I agree, they can be hard to find, but it is not as if they are impossible to find. cars for sale and autotrader have a few dozen listed as of this morning, I am sure a CL search would turn up even more. I purposely picked the diesel because of how reliable the drive train has proven to be

>>7259340
Yep, made completely in Excel. Import the Excel sheet into photoshop to "capture" it as an image to post to the board

>>7259380
will see if I can rework to include this, will fix grammar error

>>7260344
If we end up doing the "How to inspect/diagnose a used car sticky I think it would fit better there
>>
>>7260442

I searched within 200 miles of my location and only TDIs that were significantly over $5k appeared or ones that had issues.
The Golf TDI is impossible to find for under $10k.

I am just suggesting that a diesel category be added and those cars be replaced.
>>
File: 1355496630084.jpg-(34 KB, 390x344, 1327244774549.jpg)
34 KB
34 KB JPG
>>7260408
>well built
>>
>>7260487
yea i agree, but put it under the ecobox.
>inb4 diesel trucks
fuck 'em for now, this is a novie guide, indepth may come later...if ever
>>
>>7260517

Well Built /=/ reliable
>>
>>7260521


I think it is wrong that TDIs are specified in in smaller cars and not trucks. If you are buying a pickup and it is not diesel, you shouldn't buy one. Having diesel in a tacoma is far more important than having diesel in a Golf
>>
>>7260660
Find me a diesel Tacoma in north america for under $5k.

Personally I think we can drop diesels completly, except in the largest class of truck and SUV.
>>
>>7260815
I thought that was the point he was getting at...
>>
>>7260815
But the TDI is the MOST available diesel passenger car line, is easily acquired for under $5k, and satisfies each slot VERY well.
If your arguement is that people are too ignorant to deal with diesel, then they shouldn't have looked in to a diesel car in the first place.
>>
>>7260815
Old merc diesels and under 5k easy, and they'd be a great choice
>>
>>7260831
Looking at my local classifieds, I guess I never realized how cheap they are.

I kow nothing on reliability of them, but they might be a viable option.

I know that smaller diesels (like those found in 1/4 ton trucks in the 80s) are impossible to find parts for, and impossible to find someone who knows how to work on them. As long as thats not the case with the TDI, I think they are a viable recommendation.
>>
>>7260851
They're popular enough over seas where parts availability is just a premium S&H fee away.

That last MCM episode blew me the fuck away, they got FOUR, 4, MOTHERING FUCKING 5OUR, coil over shocks for $400 from germany.
I haven't shopped around too much for them but from what I've seen on the VWvortex, these things are supposedly more expensive.

Reliability is a bit better on the engine side of things (Though the only engine that comes to mind that really had issues is the 1.8t, the VR6 was just a pain to work on.) even though the normal 2.slow they toss in the Golf/Jetta/Passat is just as bulletproof.

Electrics are still probably on the same tier of 'did not work from factory'

I'm looking at you cruise controller.
>>
>>7260880
Fellow mcm lover reporting in
>>
>>7260831


Find me a Golf TDI in my area for "easily under" $5k. You can barely find one for under $8k.

I don't think people are too ignorant, i'd love a Golf TDI, but they are rare.

>>7260844

But the fuel economy on them is still pretty poor due to weight 10 tons making a diesel Merc more expensive than a new lighter gasoline car.
>>
>>7261333
After looking over the discussion here, I may broaden the Golf to include the regular gas engines as well (I do believe it is a solid choice) just to give people who are looking more choices.

I have no intention of dropping the diesel option thought, there are more than enough out there if someone really wants to track one down, these are a few I found, there were many may more:


http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/searchresults.xhtml?zip=27407&endYear=2013&fuelCodes
=DSL&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&sellerTypes=b&maxPrice=6000&fuelCode=DSL
&modelCode1=GOLF&makeCode1=VOLKS&startYear=1981&numRecords=25&searchRadius=0&
;minPrice=1&showcaseOwnerId=75581&captureSearch=true&Log=0

http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?endYear=2013&fuelCodes=DSL&zip=
27407&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&sellerTypes=b&maxPrice=6000&mmt=%5BVOLK
S%5BGOLF%5B%5D%5D%5B%5D%5D&modelCode1=GOLF&showcaseOwnerId=75581&makeCode1=VOLKS&sta
rtYear=1981&searchRadius=0&minPrice=1&listingId=335054710&listingIndex=1&Log=0

http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?endYear=2013&fuelCodes=DSL&zip=
27407&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&sellerTypes=b&maxPrice=6000&mmt=%5BVOLK
S%5BGOLF%5B%5D%5D%5B%5D%5D&modelCode1=GOLF&showcaseOwnerId=75581&makeCode1=VOLKS&sta
rtYear=1981&searchRadius=0&minPrice=1&listingId=335448242&listingIndex=2&Log=0

http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?endYear=2013&fuelCodes=DSL&zip=
27407&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&sellerTypes=b&maxPrice=6000&mmt=%5BVOLK
S%5BGOLF%5B%5D%5D%5B%5D%5D&modelCode1=GOLF&showcaseOwnerId=75581&makeCode1=VOLKS&sta
rtYear=1981&searchRadius=0&minPrice=1&listingId=335778677&listingIndex=3&Log=0
>>
>>7261405


http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/searchresults.xhtml?endYear=2013&fuelCodes=DSL&zip=0
2115&listingType=used&listingTypes=used&sellerTypes=b&fuelCode=DSL&modelCode1=GO
LFANDRABBITMODELS&sortBy=derivedpriceASC&makeCode1=VOLKS&startYear=1981&numRecords=2
5&searchRadius=200&showcaseOwnerId=66012445&captureSearch=true&Log=0

nothing within 200 miles....
>>
>>7261509
As stated, the diesel option is harder to track down, it might require some serious looking (Hence the reason I may add the gas option back in). I have known people who have traveled over 10 hours to pick up a used car before though, so I don't think it's fair to drop the TDI altogether when you take into account how bulletproof they are WHEN you can track one down.
>>
>>7261531
It would be really stupid to remove it because it was hard to find.
You have AWD DSM as an alternative for christ sake.
And GT4 Celica,
>>
File: 1355529089396.png-(674 KB, 1409x4399, RC2.png)
674 KB
674 KB PNG
Ok guys, here we go Release candidate 2

Again, the vast majority of changes are in formatting, grammar, and structure

Attempted to further refine, condense, and unify all aspects of the charts formatting, grammar, and structure. All titles with the exception of one block in the wagons are now the same font. "And" has been replaced with "&" in all instances on the chart other than in the intro and concluding texts. (let me know if I missed any in the main body of the chart). Reworked text and box border spacing to make things a little more readable.

Two major changes were revised in this addition.

-After further review, the VW Golf in Econoboxes was expanded to include gasoline models due to the limited availability of the TDI drivetrain in the market at the sub 5k price point.

-After further review,The TDI Jetta & TDI Passat were combined into a single entry due to the somewhat limited availability of the Passat. The previously axed Nissan Altima & Maxima were reinstated as alternates.

Kick it around, let me know what you guys think.

As always, feedback, thoughts, opinions, and insights are welcome
>>
>>7258303
for the love of god can you change the mitsubishi eclipse to 90-99 (1st & 2nd) generation. they didn't even have an available turbo or AWD after 1999 a 3rd gen eclipse is not a sports car.
>>
>>7262178
I can if people think this is a good idea
>>
>>7262178
also there is a plymouth laser for the 1st generation that is the same as the eclipse/talon
>>
>>7260660
yea, but no ones buys a truck for its eco friendliness
>>
>>7262208
Hippies belong on /n/ anyway.
>>
>>7261928
err i wanna agree with guy, the chances of finding those cars in AWD for under 5K is slim, BUT they do pop-up.

im 50/50 on this
>>
File: 1355532973478.png-(674 KB, 1409x4399, RC2rev1.png)
674 KB
674 KB PNG
OK guys, RC2, revision 1

Only new change is revising the Eclipse to model years 90-99 and tweaking the description.

See the previous change log for major revisions from RC1

As always, kick it around, tell me what you guys think

Feedback, comments, insights, and opinions welcome
>>
>>7261928

My point lies that you can find a Porsche 944 for cheaper and far more easily than a TDI in most areas. In fact, you can find them cheaper than a Golf in my area. Surprisingly enough the 944 gets only a few mpg worse than the Golf.

>>7262208
No, but you buy a truck for the torque, not horsepower, which makes diesels ideal. Plus you get a few more MPG.
>>
>>7262392
Ok I am confused....about what is being talked about here

The Porsche is also much more expensive to own, far less reliable in the long term, and generally found in worse condition, hence why it is special snowflake with the disclaimer it can be a hassle to own

The Golf has a long standing reputation as being a great economy car, can be found in good condition at this price point, is cheap to own, and is god tier reliable in a diesel drivetrain. It was expanded to include gasoline options in the last 2 revisions so people who were using this chart as a jumping off point would have more options to look for

As far as diesel options, almost every truck on the trucks section is available in a diesel drivetrain configuration.
>>
>>7262375
>aim to spend around 2 to 3k for a decent vehicle in most categories
>max mileage: 150,000 to 200,000
>90s to mid 00s
>listing civics, corollas, accords, camrys, altimas, and maximas

Where the fuck do you live where you can find any of those in decent condition under 150k miles for less than $7k, much less $2-3k. I've been searching half my state (Georgia) for cars less than $6k and I would fucking shit myself if I found any of those cars with under 150k miles for $3k in a condition that wasn't pure shit.
>>
>>7262610
You can't find them for under 150K But you can can find them with 150-200K, maybe a little more, all day long
>>
>>7262682
Yeah, but your guide says 150k is the max mileage on the car unless I'm misreading it. And that would make sense seeing as how at 200k is typically about the time that a Civic will start shitting itself.
>>
>>7262704
You are, the max mileage is meant to express the top end mileage you might expect to find on buying a car in this price range

Aka a late 90's civic will have between 150 to 200K on it in the 5K and under price range
>>
>>7262704
how about you widen your search and go out of state? its not a new car list, its a first car list.
>>
>>7262730
how would you guys feel if i asked you include the lexus GS and ES

the Es wqould go under the honda accord alternate 91-99

and the GS would be with the lexus LS
>>
>>7262823

no mam your son is gay im a fraid
>>
For the Audi A6:

A 2.7t will give you a lot of power, however the car is noteable for needing repairs many times.

The 4.2 has a lot of power (300hp) and is fairly reliable however it costs more than the 3.0/2.7t. It also has a different body style, looks nicer.

(I own a 4.2)
>>
OP for the fox body mustangs a really common problem fucked up torque boxes. If you drive hard even with a stock engine the spot weld wont hold. If torque box is fine you can reinforce them cheaply if not then its a expensive repair.
>>
>implying anyone is actually taking note of the 'information' in this thread.
>>
>>7264292

There is actually a lot of good info in this thread.
>>
>>7263229
>>7263602
So noted, will see how much of this information I can work in

>>7264484
Very true, and hopefully once as much as possible is worked into the chart, it will be much easier for people to understand
>>
Will this eventually be stickied above the bike sticky? Doesn't make sense to have a motorcycle sticky before a car sticky here.
>>
>>7264789
It is my hope to have the chart being worked on in this thread combined with the bike sticky once it is complete.
>>
File: 1355601000401.jpg-(549 KB, 3200x2400, template idea.jpg)
549 KB
549 KB JPG
So to expand and improve on your list in the sticky that will come to follow its completion, what about expanding the thread with posts like this or something similar.

You could also note under the car if there is a tripfag, or tripfags who own the car that you could ask questions.
>>
>>7264936

>stroking tripfags' egos

pls no
>>
>>7264936
I have considered adding a photo of each car with it's column on the chart, but have yet to do so for a couple of reasons

1.) It would almost double the already monstrous size

2.)There is no easy way to automatically resize pictures to "autofill" a cell in excel. I would have to make all the adjustments by hand, and it would take an extremely long time haha
>>
File: 1355604319216.png-(795 KB, 1281x555, possiblev2.0.png)
795 KB
795 KB PNG
OK guys, actually need some thoughts here.

I reworked the Econobox section with pictures, I think it looks so good, I may rework EVERY section this way, and just say "fuck it" to how big the chart gets

It would give me room to work in a kind of easy read 1-5 star "how expensive the cars are to own" section as well

Please guys, tell me what you think, and if it's an enough of an improvement to justify redoing all other sections as such.

I don't mid doing it if people think it looks/flows better.

Pic related, example of the rework
>>
>>7265082
My only gripe is that I think the Mk3 is a better looking Golf and should be up there, but the Mk4 is styled similarly to the Civic/Corolla.

>mk3 star rating
solid 3
>>
>>7265091
3 stars in terms of how expensive it is to own? I'm trying to pick a model year from the middle of the range of recommended years

Also, need more feedback on if people like it better with pictures or without
>>
>>7265140
Yea, 3/5 in expensive to own, the manual for my 2.slow says premium (Heh.), and from the maintenance costs, mpgs, etc.
It's an auto so it doesn't even get decent mpgs.
>>
>>7265082
if you do that I wouldn't mind seeing a picture of the interior too, that's what one of the big things I'm looking for, and you mention in some of your notes. Of course this is only if you don't care how big it gets.
>>
>>7265321
I decided to go ahead and rework it with photos. I probably won't do interior though because of how it looks like the sizing is going to have to be to make it work, you wouldn't be able to do pictures of good enough quality to show much of an interior. Plus on columns that have a combination of models, you would easily fall into the trap of having to do 10-15 pictures.

People are going to have to settle for 1-4 decent pictures of the exterior, depending on how many things I have lumped together in one column
>>
New update coming soon. Still reworking to include pictures. Shit is a bitch to do by hand
>>
>>7265091

The MK3 is more difficult to find as well. Outside diesels, the drive train simply didn;t last as long as Japanese cars. Plus tons of hondas are owned by older people who never drive which makes it easier to find a 1995 civic with 150,000 miles on it.

It is easy to forget how piss poor automatics were in the 90's. Today the break even a lot of the times with manuals, but an automatic golf gets like 21 mpg while the manual gets like 27
>>
>>7265321

If you've been a in a modern car or even a olrder European car, the interior on nearly all Japanese cars will make you believe they didn't even bother to design the interior.

"Alright the drivetrain is done, let move onto devloping a look for the car and designing an interior"
"It has V-TEC, that is is good enough"
>>
Shit, reworked everything with pictures, and of course it exceeds to the max file size haha
>>
>>7265790
dafuq, the inside of my '93 accord was sumptuous dark-blue.
>>
File: 1355626820702.png-(2.93 MB, 1281x2690, WDP1_v2.0.0.png)
2.93 MB
2.93 MB PNG
OK guys, had to split the chart into 3 parts with the pictures, adding images turned this into a fucking beast

Part 1
>>
File: 1355626865444.png-(2.94 MB, 1281x2217, WDP2_v2.0.0.png)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB PNG
Part 2
>>
File: 1355626928395.png-(2.96 MB, 1281x2377, WDP3_v2.0.0.png)
2.96 MB
2.96 MB PNG
And part 3

Kick around this new revision, tell me if you guys like it better with the pictures or not
>>
>>7266322
Oughta add the prices
>>
>>7266341
This has already been discussed, these are all cars that can be found for 5K or under, price would depend on condition and model year, there is no real point in having a price row.
>>
>>7266322
>>7266327
>>7266335

Not bad but I would definitely say try and add at least one rear end shot for each car, dat ass is important too bro.
>>
Alright guys, after much work, I have Release Candidate 3 put together. I am going to start a thread on the main board with it so that the chart doesn't get bumped down by comments, and to hopefully get more feedback since people will have a more direct idea of what they are looking at

Stay tuned
>>
Longpost Guy, I foresee you getting many points like this with people constantly saying you missed x and y car for certain sections, I would suggest you add another area to list some of these commonly mentioned cars, underneath them you could dot point reasons as to why they were not included and possibly include sources yourself.
>>
Tonights thread on the board provided a lot of input and food for thought. Gonna sleep on a few things, may do some revisions in the morning/afternoon and start up a new thread and get peoples feedback.
>>
Will there be an Euro edition or what?
>>
>>7268478
If a Euro anon wants to make one, sure. I do not have the knowledge of experience to be qualified to make on .
>>
>>7268533
After this is complete any plans for the same chart for maybe 5-10k range cars?
>>
>>7268602
I have thought about possibly making an "add-on" that would highlight cars that become available at the 5-10K price range, since the cars in this chart don't really become "bad" at the higher price bracket. This way you could avoid the overlap you would get into.
>>
→▲
▲ ▲
>>

▲ ▲
>>
>yfw the mods forgot about this stupid shit
>>
>>7270247
Haha we are close to having the chart ironed out, which we couldn't have done without this thread, at which point I will email moot again asking him to go ahead an shit can this thread and post the chart up with the bike sticky
>>
stick all the pics into one super long megapicture
then post it on tinyurl like /g/ does with falconguide
>>
I'm so fucking sick of seeing the stupid motorcycle thread EVERY FUCKING TIME I come here, now I have to look at your faggy fucking post-it note.

Yea, I want 2 more PERMANENT stickies. Sounds fucking WONDERFUL. How about the entire first 9 pages are stickes? How about we just print out the stickies, stick then to our monitor then shut down /o/?
>>
>>7271385
get of 4chan then

why didnt you post with your trip?
>inb4 no trip
my ass
>>
>>7271385
>doesn't know you can hide threads
>newfag detected
lel
>>
>>7271385
holy shit buttmad overload. leave /o/ and go back to /b/
>>
>>7272470

I find angry rants funny. I like comics like Lewis Black and Louis C.K.

When I see something that makes me mad I try to make my rant as sarcastic and exaggerated as I can, but no one else ever seems to think it's funny so maybe I should stop.
>>
>>7271417

Also, of course I don't trip, I'm not a faggy little 14 year old girl desperate for attention and recognition for my "witty" internet remarks.
>>
>>7272446
>>7272470
This.

>>7272620
I can't say I don't understand this. Tis indeed fun, but that time it was just overboard, and overall pointless.

>>7272621
More so you don't have to recite what vehicle you drive and what you have experience with every time you post.

You'd probably understand that a bit better if you actually had a car or ever posted anything remotely constructive.
>>
To those still interested, I am hoping to have the true final draft of the chart out tonight for people to kick around.

If things look pretty settled, I am going to spend a day going over it in detail to try and spot any grammar/spelling errors that are still hiding out, then try and get back ahold of moot to get is stickied
>>
>>7273694

>You'd probably understand that a bit better if you actually had a car or ever posted anything remotely constructive.

No need to invent random negative attributes to make me look bad.

I understand the old "so I don't have to repeat myself" /o/ tripfag excuse, but it still doesn't fly. There is NO NEED WHATSOEVER to be a fancy little e-celebrity just to participate in /o/. I've shown and talked about the cars I've built here before, and gotten quite a few fans on a per thread basis, and have never felt the need to throw on a trip as to "continue my self importance legacy" or what-the-fuck ever.

The classic /o/ tripfag excuse happens to be a semi-plausible sounding one, and as such, has been rather tolerated, but the truth remains that when you boil it down, it's still just the same old attention whores who care FAR too much about their self image rather than whatever deeds they have done.

"When I retire, I don't want to just move to some island somewhere. I want to be the guy who gives it all back. I want it to be like, 'Hey... who donated that hospital wing that's saving so many lives?' 'I don't know. It was anonymous.' 'Well, guess what. It was Michael Scott.' 'But how do you know? It was anonymous.' [pause] 'Because I'm him.'" ~Michael Scott
>>
>>7274060
>No need to invent random negative attributes to make me look bad.

Really? See:
>There is NO NEED WHATSOEVER to be a fancy little e-celebrity just to participate in /o/.
>"continue my self importance legacy"
>it's still just the same old attention whores who care FAR too much about their self image rather than whatever deeds they have done.

You're doing exactly what you just accused me of doing.
It's not about being an "e-celebrity" It's about saving the effort of explaining who you are when need be, and taking responsibility for your posts. I have no reason to hide the fact that it's me posting, so I wont.

Can you say the same for yourself?
>>
>>7274107

No, I'm not inventing random things like accusing you of not owning a car or ever contributing anything. I'm using insults. Obvious difference.

You say "save the effort" and "take responsibility" like those aren't the exact same thing's I'm saying are shit. In a nutshell, you're trying to make sure people remember who you are whenever you post. That's EXACTLY THE PROBLEM. You're being vain and looking for recognition.

"But I need to let everyone know about my cars with every post!"

No you don't. You're not a special little snowflake.

"But I'm a valiant, honorable, noble man who takes responsibility for his posts!"

It's just something you said. Taking "responsibility" for it is just taking the credit for what was said.

I don't mean this as an insult, but you're not important enough to need to be remembered. I doubt anyone here is. It takes a decent person to admit that. lol, be a decent person, drop the trip!
>>
>>7274295
>stop liking things i dont like

stfu and hide the threads that make your anus hurtful
>>
>>7274295
>No, I'm not inventing random things like accusing you of not owning a car or ever contributing anything. I'm using insults. Obvious difference.

>You're not being directly offensive, I am.
Way to go.

But like I said, there's no reason for me not be associated with my posts. It makes you feel all good about your self thinking "Oh, I'm so humble I don't even take credit for my own posts. I'm such a great person. Like a dark night or some shit" You get the same self satisfaction out of it that you're accusing others of getting out of tripping.

Taking responsibility means that I can't just lie about what I've done, who I am, or what I own at any given time. I'm me, anyone who bothers to pay attention to the trips recognizes that, and would gladly call me out on any lie I tell. Where as you on the other hand, take zero responsibility for your posts, and actually think that your chosen ability to completely abandon your posts when you're called out on something and take no responsibility for it makes you a better person.

I have no allusions of grandeur or fame, The way I see it, I am a member on this forum, you are a guest. Any forum is, in a way, a community. Members recognize each other, they have a known past, and have to take responsibility for their posts. You choose to not be a part of that. You live under the assumption that you're somehow a better person than people who do choose to be a part of that.

Live and let live. I don't call out anons at random moments, constantly whine about them, and tell them they're horrible self absorbed morons for posting anonymously. I expect you to show me the same respect. You don't have to trip if you don't want to, and I don't have to remain anonymous if I don't want to. Agree to disagree, and leave it at that. Be the bigger person you keep claiming to be.
>>
>>7274446
wow who knew a thread about helping people could turn into such a huge shit throwing ego fest stop fucking posting
>>
>>7274718
Just calling it how I see it. If you don't like it, feel free not to reply.
>>
>>7274446

>The way I see it, I am a member on this forum, you are a guest. Any forum is, in a way, a community. Members recognize each other, they have a known past

That's the thing. This is supposed to be the exception. EVERY OTHER FORUM IN EXISTENCE has it your way. What made 4chan great is that it was the ONE place where e-celebrities were shunned, not praised.

Thanks for coming along and taking away the one that WE had.
>>
>>7274797
And the entire point flew over your head. You'll get it one day.


Maybe.
>>
>>7274813

Yea, tell yourself that I "just don't get it." WAY easier than accepting fault in one's self. Stay vain, pleb.

It's easy to ignore those of you who treat 4chan like facebook 2.0, so I'm not sweating you much.
>>
>>7274901
I'm not just telling myself you don't get it. You looked through the entire post and only found one line that you could remove from context and attempt to turn it into something you could argue against.

You want everyone to be anonymous, go back to /b/. There's no reason for it here.
>>
I know I totally missed out on all this triphate nonsense. But I have to admit anon sounds pretty buttmad. If tripfagging were such a detrimental problem for the boards I imagine it would be removed. It just boils down to anon and its disillusion that "4chan is only teh cool if anon." Because you can't -possibly- enjoy a board if a tripfag exists.

I have to admit though, I only really see this on /o/ There are occasional others, but most people seem to be pretty fine with trips.
>>
Pouring over the final draft now, may get it polished enough to try and send to moot tonight. Will post here shortly to avoid cluttering up the board with another thread.
>>
File: 1355864660820.png-(2.88 MB, 1301x2821, FDP1.png)
2.88 MB
2.88 MB PNG
Final Draft Part 1
>>
File: 1355864705215.png-(2.98 MB, 1305x2230, FDP2.png)
2.98 MB
2.98 MB PNG
Final Draft Part 2
>>
File: 1355864831246.png-(2.94 MB, 1309x2234, FDP3.png)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB PNG
Final draft Part 3
>>
>>7277609
>>7277621
>>7277623
>>7277630
Looks pretty good LPG.
>>
>>7277621
>>7277623
>>7277630

why is the width off by 3 pixels for each picture? was it the photos?
>>
>>7277921
What do you mean?
>>
>>7278000
"1301"x2821
"1305"x2230
"1309"x2234

that
its not a bif deal, ill fix it when i get around to join the photos
>>
>>7278043
Ah are you trying to join it back together as one image?
>>
Bring back the Golf.

The only thing the focus has over the golf is fuel economy..
But I'd keep the Golf at at top option, especially if you can find the 1.8 Turbo
>>
>>7278121
The drivetrain is more reliable in the golf as well, the escorts zetec has a few issues.

>A very common problem on the 2000–2004 Ford Focus with the 2.0L SPI SOHC engine is the tendency to drop a valve seat.[42] European models don't have this problem, as only the North American Focus was available with the SPI engine. These engines usually drop a valve seat with no warning, for no reason, even if the engine has been well maintained. With most dropped valve seat cases, a seat drops on the number 4 cylinder, with the next most common being the number 2 cylinder. With the factory valve seats, the typical life of the 2.0L SPI in the Focus is about 100-120k miles,[43] but it can happen as early as 70k miles. When the valve seat drops out of the cylinder head, it falls into the cylinder and mashes up the piston and cylinder head. In some cases, the valve seat will exit the cylinder it dropped in and be sucked into other cylinders via the intake manifold until its obliverated. A valve seat dropping into the cylinder can, and sometimes will, scar the cylinder wall up and bend the piston connecting rods. When repairing an SPI with a dropped valve seat, it is very important to remove the intake manifold and have it thoroughly cleaned before bolting it up to a new cylinder head. If not cleaned, trapped particles in the manifold from the dropped valve seat will enter the repaired engine and scar the cylinder walls and sometimes ruin the new cylinder head. The best solution for avoiding the dropped valve seat problem is to purchase and install a new cylinder head that has had the valve seat problem fixed.
>>
Quick question for /o/. I work at a dealership and they just got in a used 2000 Impala with 140k miles on it. Its got the 3.8L in it and for me, they'd only want 3,300 for it, which is 300 over what they own it for, since I work there. I wouldn't mind putting new breaks/tires on it, there's damn near no rust on it, some underneath but nothing too bad.

Right now I'm driving a '99 S10 4.3L that's all different types of fucked up, put 1.5k into it just to make it legal to drive/actually driveable. But I'm only getting 16 mpg and I sure as fuck need something better than that. The Impala has 25.8 for it's gas mileage as an average, but idk how the previous owner drove it so I'll be slightly above or below that.

So, /o/, thoughts and opinions?
>>
>>7278196
Trade truck in and get the Impala.
Phase II 3800 isn't it? We've got quite a few 3800fags on here, make a thread about it and shitstorms a brewin
>>
>>7278121
>>7278170
Overall inventory, MPG, and lower cost of ownership put the focus ahead numbers wise. The golf only exceeds the focus in average life span with the TDI drivetrain(I had originally overestimated how common it was), which is almost impossible to find in some places. This is why the golf was swapped back to the alternate position

In terms of traceable data, the Focus has far fewer incidents of reported issues and repair, and long term is much cheaper to own.
>>
>>7278099
yes
>>
>>7278206
Well my monthly payments would only be 135 without a trade in, so I was thinking I'll just go that route and sell my truck on the side of the road for more than the 600 they'd give me for it.
>>
>>7278279
Don't worry about it. i have already found a ton more errors in it since posting those images. I will send it as one large image when I email moot
>>
>>7278328
OK, final draft sent to moot, it's in the gods hands now
>>
>>7278232

That may be true. But you have to remember, the standard option on the Golf is superior to the focus.Focus are hard to find with things like power windows,leather seats, CD players.more than one cigarette lighter.

Plus another huge factor is community. The Golf has a very active community that will help you fix anything on the car. i don't think it is as extensive with the focus

As I also said. 1.8 T are common in Golfs which is huge.
>>
Longpost guy man,

you should now make a thread asking for peoples location to make a tripfriends map, you seem to be good at wasting a lot of your time on here. the last map is way out dated
>>
File: 1355885461527.jpg-(15 KB, 200x200, image.jpg)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>7278670
>>
Well guys, the final product can be found here:

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png

It may not be perfect, but I am pretty happy with it

I have emailed moot asking him to merge it into the bike sticky, will have to wait and see if he does it/gets back to me on it. either way, it's here for your guys use
>>
>>7279032
>mk4 volkswagen
>maintenance: $
Are you serious?

Even VWfags will tell you that the mk4 was shit.
>>
>>7280971

The emission and electrical systems were awful.
>>
>>7281393
that can be said about most euro cars in the 90's to mid 00's
>>
>>7281669

Emission systems were awful in all cars. They still are because the CC and O2 sensors are highly wearable parts that are impossible to maintain.
>>
>>7282303
>>7282303
>>7282303


They're good cars, comparable to a Civic in every way.

>inb4 some retard comes along and says but AMERICANT shut up, retard.
>>
>>7279032
Cheers. I almost never come to /o/, but I always appreciate work being put in to make things more accessible.
>>
Alright /o/, I need your help. Here is what I am looking at tomorrow. All around $2750.

2002 Saab 9-3 hatchback with 130k on it- Seems powerful and luxurious(leather...etc) with good gas mileage and decently reliable. I've heard they are easy and hard to fix.
It is very odd that the 2.3 T in the 9-5 is substantially weaker than the 2.0 T in the 9-3.....

1998 Subaru Impreza with 150k on it. - Older, but Subaru's are the most reliable car. AWD is really nice because I live in New England, so we have actual weather. The interior is kinda bleh as is fuel economy.

2002 Ford Focus with 152k on it. I know this is an /o/ pick and it is a good car. But the mileage is high for an American car and the interior is so basic.

I've actually been looking for a Honda Civic or VW Golf/ Jetta. But the pricing on Civic are retarded. Compared to everything else under $4k it seems like if you want a Civic you have to pay more for an older car with very high mileage. Golfs for under $5k are simply just hard to find with low end of mileage.
>>
>>7279032
Neat! As someone who is just starting to get into mobile transportation units I will find this most helpful chum.
>>
File: 1356110870031.jpg-(156 KB, 380x750, 1351185724453.jpg)
156 KB
156 KB JPG
hey guys. /o/ newcomer here.

i would really love a "car care" / "what are the important parts of a car and what you should do with them" informational.
>>
>>7288677
Google motherfucker, do you use it?
That's way to broad of a sweep, that can get very specific very quickly with odd parts.

That's beyond the depth of an /o/ sticky, wat car iz gud is just enough cancer to have LPG make a sticky about it.
>>
>>7279032
Good job man, been busy as hell lately, but from what I see it looks great.
>>
File: 1356121805769.png-(2.94 MB, 1309x2234, Part 3 truck revision.png)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB PNG
Switched up the truck alternates between the F150 and the Chevy. The F250 and F350 seem more as a more fitting alternate under the F150 choice.
>>
>>7289257
SVT cobra errors: the head gasget issue was only for the 94-99 model years on the V6 model. The V8's dont suffer this problem. I would have recommended the termi myself, they pop up around LA every so often for 8 to 10k. That model year cobra costs around 5k and is miles and miles below the termi. I havent been following the thread though so maybe thats still out of the guide's price range
>>
>>7289257
they were grouped based on light, standard, and heavy duty, that is why the F-250/F-350 was grouped with the C/K series

>>7289282
it is, this guide is only 5K or under
>>
also faggoo's dont be afraid to look for car out of your state.

i live in NH and bought my car from PA.
>uhaul tow bed
>zipcar ford escape

or if you have a cool friend with a car or just bring them in the rental
>>
This sticky died, mod remove it
>>
File: 1356244515144.png-(6 KB, 448x357, 364.png)
6 KB
6 KB PNG
>>7294619
you could hide it yourself if you had more brains than a log.

spend an evening and see if you cant do it!
>>
>>7294725
Say that to my face in real life faggot
>>
>>7297849
How many miles?
>>
File: 1356328625590.jpg-(124 KB, 933x700, rusty 260z.jpg)
124 KB
124 KB JPG
Looking at a Datsun 260z for around $4000, how much cash would I end up sinking into this thing and what should I be looking for when I go to inspect it?

Pic Related
>>
File: 1356329186499.png-(4 KB, 200x200, literally.png)
4 KB
4 KB PNG
>>7299011
you could theoretically solve the debt crisis, its that much.
>>
>>7299060
>>7299011
Yep, what he said. If it's rusted a bit, it's rusted a lot, with these cars.
>>
>>7299075
Sorry, thought you meant that specific one in the pic.
>>
File: 1356329453427.jpg-(110 KB, 933x700, rusty 260z 2.jpg)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
>>7299060

I'm looking for a number.
>>
>>7299084
zero. seriously. its got no floors either.

>you will essentially end up sculpting a z out of bondo.
>>
>>7299094

So assuming a find another one without rust being a problem then what am I expecting?
>>
>>7299107
double your budget. and a long wait.
>>
>>7299107
>find another one without rust
>another one without rust
>one without rust
>without rust

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>7297849
>>7298553
On a rebuilt or "new" engine, right?
>>
>>7279032
made a tinyurl for it

tinyurl com/5kcarguide
>>
>>7300303
He's assuming that the quoted mileage is on the rebuilt or replaced engine and the car has more miles than that. But if it's the actual mileage that's a really good price, I paid about the same for a 92 Corolla with 160k.
>>
Looking at a 1992 BMW M5 on thursday with 150k on it. Only $4500 and it appears to be in pretty good shape.


Wish me luck
>>
So when is he going to join all 3 photos?
>>
Already joined here:

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png
>>
>>7231343
You can add 2001 BMW 740i to the "Something Classy" list. They usually go for a max of 20K.
>>
Oh shit, under 5k budget car sticky would be GLORIOUS.

I hope you do a Europe version. I'm begging you.,
>>
>>7297849
No, because it's been wrecked and poorly repaired. Bumper and fender are horribly aligned. The cheap aftermarket wheels also suggests a questionable previous owner.
>>
You know, i see all these fucking "lets make a sticky" thread... and then THEY NEVER USE THE FUCKING STICKY...

Seriously, what the fuck is the point of that shit?
>>
Miata. Nimble in traffic, open top for when it gets punted into a canal. 3 star safety rating for the driver, good brakes, and a bulletproof Japanese drivetrain. Not to mention that it's fun and, because it's girly, girls like to be seen in it.
>>
1985-'94 Chevrolet Camaro/Pontiac Firebird, parts are everywhere and you can always find a guy that knows his way around the motor. + down the road if you ever run into any money, this thing can get really mean for not alot.
>>
How do you know when to pull the trigger?

I've come across an E34 BMW 525i, a Saab 9-3, and a Subaru Impreza Outback all under budget.

But I'd rather have a 3-series, an A4, a nice Golf, or any VW TDI car.

I keep feeling if I get one, I'll regret not getting the other or something else.
>>
can we have posting guidelines in the sticky for help requests?
I somewhat like talking about diagnostics and urging people to pursue repairing their own vehicles. but it's hard when someone just posts
"my car won't start", or "does any one know anything about hyundais?"
at minimum we need to require year, make, model, engine, drivetrain configuration, and a basic description of what the problem is and when it occurs.
>>
>sticky

/o/ confirmed for pleb board
>>
>>7315243
/g/ here

That means we aren't plebs, are we ?
>>
File: 1356720380376.jpg-(35 KB, 800x800, Desktop-Jellyfish-tank.jpg)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
>>7315543
/g/ will you marry me?
>>
>>7317637
Only if you love anime and Desktops more than technology.

Otherwise we want nothing to do with you because that's all we do.

Talk about anime and desktops.

No really, we're that worthless. Instead of going to /a/, we like to use /g/ as our secret club because no one would even think to look there (Haha dumb mods can't even catch us we're that cool!).

So unless you hate discussing technology but love super sugoi anime kawaii no desuuuu~~!!! then you're nothing to us.

Thanks
>>
File: 1356727508111.jpg-(249 KB, 1600x1200, jellyfish dangerous.jpg)
249 KB
249 KB JPG
>>7317961
You guys sound hardcore. Youre only getting me wetter.
>>
So horny for this
>>
File: 1356772392996.jpg-(150 KB, 800x600, custom-honda-civic-coupe.jpg)
150 KB
150 KB JPG
/o/ whats a relatively fast car that gains decent hp per under the hood mod?
Im new to cars and trying to gain that experience at my age.
Would a civic be a good idea to mod while gaining the speed?
sorry for the newby question on the sticky thread.
inb4 lurk moar
pic related, what i dont want my shitbox to look like.
>>
>>7321270

Most american v8's. They're pretty detuned from the factory so a few mods really open them up. A 5.0 fox mustang with a nasty heads/cam/intake combo will scream compared to a stock one. Add in some gears and a touch of nitrous and it will take a pretty heavily modded car to beat it in any sort of drag race.

Since you're looking for something cheap it seems I'd go for a simple car with some bulletproof drivetrain components. The less money you spend on repairing stupid shit and finding broken electrical components the more money you can spend on tools and mods.

A note: the bare minimum tool quality you should buy is Craftsman which is sold at Sears. No matter what you hear anywhere these things are amazing quality for the price, and they should still carry a lifetime guarantee (e.g., if a wrench in the 20 year old set in my garage snaps I can still walk into sears and get a new one free, and note, the ONLY things I've had break are the socket wrenches, and that's because I'm positive I've put more torque through them then they should have ever seen).
>>
>>7321327
the reason i want it cheap is so i can learn.
it wouldnt be too keen buying a viper just to gut it out and mess it up somehow
>>
>>7321382

When it comes down to it man, there is very little to learn about cars at this level. I could give you the service manual to my motorcycle, and as long as you aren't retarded, can read and follow directions, I could expect you to disassemble it completely, and then reassemble it and it be safe for me to ride.

Past that, you can get some general knowledge so you can "talk the talk" and know what taller/shorter gears will do, or know what duration/lift means regarding camshafts etc etc. But that shit doesn't matter that much. And going beyond that, you're going into engineering shit, how to reduce friction, which oil is the best, and in depth discussions on why. How grinding down (port and polish) your head will get you more power and why going to far will reduce power. The actual wrench turning? that shit is simple and just following a few steps.

If you're really interested in learning about this shit pick up some books and find good forums with people who know what the fuck they're talking about. On one of the forums I'm on, one of the threads was discussing a race between a large turbo viper making like 1100 peak hp, and a small turbo viper making like 950 peak hp. A highly regarded viper guy said the 1100hp one would crush the smaller turbo one, even though it made the power so much later in the power band.

By using some basic calculus (integration) on the dyno charts, and then looking at the gearing of the cars to see at what rpm you'd expect the cars in when going through the gears. We quickly saw that the 950hp car would easily win in a race because it had a greater impulse (integration of force over time). That's the shit that matters, peak hp is solely for bragging rights. Knowing what parts to choose for your car and why is usually way more indepth then 99.9% of tuners understand
>>
>>7321433
thanks for your help!
any recommendations to pass on?
>>
what's a good used car to get for around 6000-7000 euros? should use benzin and not burn too much of it if possible. no preferences on anything else really. should last a long time.

germany if it matters
>>
>>7219091
>hard to find an automatic
>con
>>
Hey guys, been tied up with holiday/new year fanfare and what not, haven't really been online that much the last week or so.

To give everyone an update, the final version of the American chart can be found here:

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png

I hit up moot about merging it in with our bike sticky before Xmas but I never heard back from him. I may try emailing him again or throw up a thread in /q/ about it, but moot may think it sucks/is a terrible idea/not care, but the chart is here for those who are interested.

If people think the American chart turned out half way decent, I would be up for trying to create an Aussie/Euro version of the chart next, but I would need some major help from Aussie & Euro anons since I can freely admit I don't have the knowledge base to even try and start working on a non-american version of this chart.

Or if people think those are dumb, I am open to any suggestions for a /o/ related project. I have more than a month before school starts back, and I wouldn't mind having something to piddle around on over break.
>>
HOOT HOOT MOTHERFUCKER IM A TRUCK
>>
>>7339182
Chart turned out pretty awesome, I'll see what I can pitch in as an aussie anon. Main thing you'd need to change is miles to kms, since the list seems pretty transferable apart from the lack of Holdens.

Holden Calais VP:
Years: 1991 to late 90's
Kms: 200'000 to 300'000
Pro: Nice step up from the Standard Commodore in terms of luxury without going up to a Statesman. Reliable as clockwork. Plenty to choose from and easy to get parts for. Plenty of space.
Cons: Quite heavy due to extra features, which hurts performance, typical Holden gauge problems, previous owner probably drove it hard. Not great economy.
To look for: Electical issues with accessories, engine tiredness. Look at what type of person the owner is. Power steering fluid leaks.
>>
>>7339962
VP's were only made from 91-93. They are also arguably the worst of the VN-VS series, the only redeeming feature is that they are cheaper, which is due to their shitness.
>>
>>7339182
>http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png

Well done LPG.

Good stuff
>>
>>7340721
>http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png

>you'll look like a cop
>a con
>>
>>7332814
>>7332814
anyone?
>>
>>7341833
not familiar with benzine, heard of it but not knowledgable...where are you from that it's a common fuel?
>>
>>7343295
Benzin=gas=petrol
>>
Any opinions on a 92 nissan sentra with 180k km on it?

Its my mom's old car, all it needs is about $1k in repairs, otherwise its free
>>
>>7349938
If it's in good shape, go for it
>>
So this is kinda like the "wut car good" thread, yeah?
I'm looking to pick something up for <$2000 USD that's a manual so I can teach myself how to drive a standard. Wouldn't be a DD; I'm keeping my little ecobox
There's a few Stealths and Preludes in my area on craigslist but I'm betting they'll be too high to insure for me.
I know the smart thing to do would be to get something like a Civic or S10, but after I master the stick I don't want to go "Great, now I can drive this fuckin Civic around. Whoopee"
>>
>>7350611
reference the chart my good sir:

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png

If you could find a half decent Miata, Golf, or GTI, you'd have a fun and possibly practical car after you finished learning how to drive stick
>>
I don't wanna make a whole thread about it, I was just hoping for an answer.

Does anyone know the badges that go on the front quarter panel of a CM Chrysler valiant regal?

Nowhere on the internet is a picture with enough quality for me to tell.
>>
Should i get a tiburon? The ones on craigslist are pretty cheap (all under 5k) and they look alright. It will be my first car so I was wondering if its worth it or not.
>>
>>7355596
>hyundai
>first car
no.
.
unless you're gonna crash it, then yes.
>>
Almost 1500 posts already. Get your shit together.
>>
>>7350647
Shouldn't the focus hatchback say it comes in 3 and 5 door models not 2 and 4?
>>
>>7356576
I imagine a lot of Americans don't get the whole "hatch=door" thing.
>>
>>7356719
I'm just guessing, because in Canada a lot of people don't seem to catch on to that.
>>
>>7356719
Actually in America the hatch is considered a door. That's why I was wondering why it says 2 and 4 instead of 3 and 5. They are even badged "ZX3" and "ZX5" respectively
>>
>>7357243
Well you are right, I'm just speculating on why he would make the chart like that.
>>
File: 1357513105343.jpg-(371 KB, 800x800, ytFIN.jpg)
371 KB
371 KB JPG
looks pretty gay
>>
Worst thread ever, man.
>>
File: 1357538038896.jpg-(133 KB, 1280x800, oEoPU.jpg)
133 KB
133 KB JPG
down. can someone explain the M stuff on the 911 in the old thread
>>
Wrong thread, Skyrine
>>
>>7365135
i normally think that car is kinda ugly.

but that color is sexy as fuck
>>
>>7365117
Of course it doesn't fucktard, its a sticky
>>
Planes must stay in the air since they belong there like birds but what about boats though?
>>
>>7381070
I got tired of looking at that hemmorhoid.
>>
>>7381157

OK.
>>
I know this is an american site, but it would be great if someone in the know made a british version of that chart.
>>
>>7382173
It would be a bunch of 1.0L shitboxes
>>
>>7382543
I have already made the offer to attempt an Aussie/Euro/UK version of the chart, but I would need the help of some knowledgeable br/o/s from those areas of the world to be able to do it
>>
>>7383597
I'd lend a hand with the Aussie part of this, falcunt and aussiemuscle might be glad to help too
>>
>>7385407
Well, for starters, tell me what cars would need to be dropped off the Aussie version. We can start there
>>
>>7385993
Link?

Sozza for troubles but I haven't really kept up to date with the sticky
>>
DONT BUY A HONDA PAKIFAGS
>>
>>7385993
I wish I could have been here to add to the special snowflake category.
Box trucks/step vans are the greatest.
That paired with a motorcycle and you have all the utility and fun you need.
>>
Is there anything under 10K that is RWD, available in manual and would make a good DD?

Miata too small for me as im a big fuck.
>>
>>7387614
Completed american version

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/FinalDraft.png
>>
>>7391657
tinyurl version for you

http://www.tinyurl com/5kcarguide
>>
>>7392161
>>7391657
cheers cunts

ill start working on a draft over the coming week
>>
File: 1358094087460.jpg-(182 KB, 2048x1360, lol.jpg)
182 KB
182 KB JPG
"Relatively poor handling" on the fox body is a bunch of internet BS propagated by 17 year olds who are jealous because their mommy's bought them a civic.
Do some research.

And in general (on all cars that have it listed), "poor aftermarket modifications" should be clarified to explain that buyers should watch for shitty modifications made by previous owners- it is worded to almost sound like "poor aftermarket support"
>>
>>7395949
Foxbodies handle like shit stock. I owned an 87 5.0 LX with aftermarket springs and shocks. Still understeered like a bitch.

howdoiholdallthisundersteer.jpg
>>
>>7396530
guess it's the boat anchor up front?

lol...anyhow, did you change swaybars? if the spring rate all around was increased, you shouldn't see much of a change in balance of the car with rotation.
>>
Can we clean up this fucking 1400 post sticky and just have one short info thread now?
>>
>>7397087
this
>>
File: 1358223540535.jpg-(48 KB, 615x410, trackhatch.jpg)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
>>7396530
You're a textbook douche that "claims" a car has performance issues,,,, after it's been butchered.

Someone tell pic related that fox's have issues handling.
And I'm not surprised that nobody ITT has watched an American Iron Series race. That would be reserved for actual automobile enthusiasts, not basement dwellers.
>>
>>7396794
>boat anchor up front
>no heavier than RB series, or 2JZ, or VG30, etc...
>>
>>7405303
by "boat anchor" i'm pretty sure he means that it's bad at actually making power, not that it's heavy
>>
>>7408664
>comment made about handling
>"hurr must mean lolnopower"
God, you are one stupid motherfucker.
>>
File: 1358414163082.jpg-(143 KB, 1024x768, CelicaST204SXSeaSprayF.jpg)
143 KB
143 KB JPG
I put my 96 Toyota Celica in for roadworthiness (recently purchased) and took to toyota dealership cause it was cheaper for inspection than mecahnics in area but now told there is alot of things needing replacing.

Is this just toyota dealership trying to fist me over cause they dont get much service work or is the Vicroads roadworthiness really really thorough?
>>
Going on a really long road trip with friend from Texas to California. I have the price estimated for gas (increasing in price as I go because it's more expensive as I go), food, hotels, and also some emergency cash.

Other than checking up on obvious things like oil, gas, and tires what else should I look out for or do before I leave?
Also about how often should I be stopping for gas if I'm not sure how far the next gas stop will be?
>>
>>7416518
Roadworthies are pretty thorough, and despite what people will tell you there isn't an awful lot that is 'up to interpretation'.

That said, a dealership has a lot more to lose by writing out a lenient RWC than a regular workshop, so they're more likely to be extremely strict.

You should get the car RWC'd by your regular family mechanic. He wants you to come back, and knows you're not selling the car to someone who's gonna kick up a stink if something isn't up to scratch.
I can't promise that the list will be any shorter though.

Also, clean the shit outta your car before you take it there. Especially underneath and the engine bay. Make it fucking shine. Oil leaks aren't roadworthy if they drip on the floor while being inspected. So make sure there isn't 12 months of rear main seal accumulation before you take it in.
>>
An easy to do checklist

>check the gaps between all the panels, if it hasn't been worked on, the gap spacing will be even across the entire gap

>run your hand across the gap from one panel to another, the height of the two panels should be the same, if one panel is higher than the other, it has been worked on

>view the car during the day in good lighting , the paint should be a uniform color across the entire car, anything that is 'off' has been replaced/worked on
unless the entire car is repainted, its hard to get the color to match 100% even if its done at the dealership

>open up the hood, examine the bolt heads on the side (front quarter panel), typically they are painted the same color as the body, using wrenches/ratchets on those bolts will usually wear some paint off the contact points

>take a close look near the exterior seals on the doors/windows, a cheap paint job only puts tape over the seal and paints the car, lifting up the seal a little should reveal if the car has been painted before.
Note: more expensive paint jobs remove those 'seals' and cannot be detected this way.

Stay away from cars that have been in accidents, accidents are bad trouble, even it the car was 'fixed', if you're in doubt about something , just walk away and err on the side of caution.

All the 'tips' I provide here, are not guaranteed of anything,
>>
I've been reading the econobox sections and it doesn't mention mpg. I'm trading in a 5k car. What should i go for? Just a civic or can i do better. Looking for maximum mpg. Do fuel chips work?
>>
>>7418507
No, no they do not. Most fuel saving devices sold via the aftermarket are bogus.
>>
>>7418507
the econobox is for MPG.
get a golf TDI if you can afford it. I get about 45MPG on mine. though volkswagens are a little pricy to own, you make up for it in gas.
>>
File: 1358764729481.png-(57 KB, 714x796, CLK CR.png)
57 KB
57 KB PNG
>>7254193
Good on you for getting rid of that car
>>
1992 BMW 525i or 1990 Volvo 240
>>
I'm thinking about getting a used car by using money from my tax refund, but it'll only be $800.

I've been looking at Camry's and Corolla's on craigslist within a $100-$1,000 range and it looks like most of the Corolla's went to shit, but the Camry's seem to be fine; they're just old.

Now I have my eye on the 1980's models and I see two that I have an interest in.

One is an 1985 model with a bad fuel pump for $700...
http://atlanta.craigslist.org/nat/cto/3499457866.html

And there's an 1986 model, with a 5-speed for $850...
http://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/cto/3482345082.html

Lets say I take a look at them and there's nothing wrong, except for what's listed on the posting, would either one be worth buying?
>>
>>7446680
I just need a cheap, reliable, low-maintenance car that can take me to and from work and drive around town, if I want to.
>>
>>7446692
>cheap, reliable, low-maintenance car
>$1k budget

Yeah.......... no.
>>
Broke the chart up into sections, and made a low quality version that will actually post to the board

pictures incoming
>>
File: 1358930074998.jpg-(1.72 MB, 1282x2790, Practical Cars.jpg)
1.72 MB
1.72 MB JPG
the "practical cars" section
>>
File: 1358930117041.jpg-(1.71 MB, 1282x2790, Trucks_SUV_Offroad.jpg)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB JPG
the "trucks, suvs, and offroad section
>>
File: 1358930151568.jpg-(1.77 MB, 1282x2790, Sports_Lux_Snowflake.jpg)
1.77 MB
1.77 MB JPG
the sports, lux, and special snowflakes section
>>
File: 1358932071281.jpg-(2.94 MB, 1922x2825, box_layout_compress.jpg)
2.94 MB
2.94 MB JPG
and a compressed version of the whole chart that will post to /o/
>>
on the prelude only the 5th gen 97-01 have atts

and in the cons put to avoid the sport shift trans in the 97-01 as every one is guaranteed to fail.
>>
>>7447634

No section for S10's, Rangers, Dakotas, etc.
>>
>>7450731
That section exists. It's occupied by the Tacoma and the Ranger
>>
whats opinion on dodge neon srt-4?
>>
File: 1359181051644.gif-(1.18 MB, 300x188, 1347308790748.gif)
1.18 MB
1.18 MB GIF
>>7457063
probably not the right place to ask this
>>
>>7277621
>>7277623
>>7277630
>>7447575
>>7447577
>>7447579
>>7447634

This is actually pretty informative, great job
>>
New, working link to the good cheap cars infographic:

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/Good_Cheap_Cars.jpg

Old one got deleted on accident when I was trying to make one that was small enough to post to the board
>>
I got a few links might be useful

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/vintage-speed/buy-your-dream-car-for-less-than-6000?click=main_sr#slide-1

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/news/fuel-economy/8-hot-used-cars-on-sale-for-pennies-on-the-dollar?click=main_sr#slide-1

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/4283360?click=main_sr

^wagons and suv's

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/fun-cars-for-less-than-3k?click=main_sr

^ cars for under 3 grand

http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/reviews/reliability-report/the-best-used-cars-for-every-need?click=main_sr#slide-1

some of these work too

i know there are lots of popular mechanics in there but they are better then most of the articles I've turned up elsewhere
>>
>>7468020
the second link there has a Ferrari on the first slide but all the other cars are cars you could get for under 5 grand pretty much though the upkeep might not be novice friendly
>>
>>7468037
Everything but the Caddy, the Jag, and the Ferrari are already on the list.

The Jag and Caddy would be horrible recommendations to a car novice, they are both horrendously unreliable
>>
on the list for fun cars under 3000 which ones are reliable ?
>>
>>7468076
The ones that are already on our infographic.

The Miata, the E30, and the wrangler.
>>
File: 1359309762825.jpg-(340 KB, 2560x1440, phone 164.jpg)
340 KB
340 KB JPG
In the info graph regarding the recommended mileage how much meat is purposed to be left on the bone in general?

I know earnings are different for everyone and the infograph reflects many different plans , bolt on power , advanced maintenance and standard equipment to name a few but on the cars that are not going to be end of the line which ones will be the easiest to resell later so you can piggy back your way up the list prehaps to some of the nicer models?

ps

I currently have a 2001 hyundai accent and I'm trying to save my way into a nicer car. Its a GS hatchback I know nobody wants to compare a Hyundai to anything cool but I don't want to buy something parallel. What would be a nice step up if i can muster it the car only cost me 1100$ and runs great.
>>
>>7468163
No way to predict how much more you will get out of a car. That depends entirely on it's condition, how it was treated, and a lot of random chance

Honda's and Toyota's, and in general anything asian, are going to have the best resale value on down the line.

And the next step up depends on what you want and how much you want to spend
>>
>>7468263
Damn i hate a post like this one, its full of unspecific advice and leans on the "Get whatever you want" and "anything can happen". It smacks of rhetoric and will likely dissuade any further discussion. Try having a opinion along with your posts it will be far more useful.
>>
>>7224227
Are they as reliable?

I found a 1996 model on craigslist for $1000 with 185k miles and no problems except a missing passenger seat belt.
>>
>>7471273
>missing passenger seat belt
Go online and see how much those cost.
The clasps are expensive for old vehicles.
Also check for rebuild status.
>>
>>7471564
They already have the belt.

>Missing passenger side seat belt, but replacements have been bought and are included, I just haven't had time to install them yet. >Runs very well and I haven't ever had problems with it. $1000 or best offer.

http://atlanta.craigslist.org/nat/cto/3483057467.html
>>
>>7473384
Go for it, check to see if its a rebuilt (uneven panels, wrong paint behind door seals, etc)
>>
Can we get rid of the cars that are only good in certain trim levels?

I feel like there are enough nice cars out there that we could just recommend something else if the base car isn't up to snuff. Most cars have some sort of trim level that juices the auto up but if those cars are hard to find its not very novice friendly to mention them same goes for hard to find cars in general.

I also move to purge or identify cars on the list that shoppers can't obtain operable examples of for less then 2500$ If the car is sitting right at 5 grand its probably better off at 6 grand anyway.
>>
>>7481181
Just mention the higher trim levels in the details field as long as its something in budget
>>
>>7447634
Under sedans, Crown Vic should have both the positive and negative "Everyone will think you're a cop."
>>
>>7321433
I don't know who you are, or what you do, but this is solid fucking advice.
>>
Look for anything that would fuck up your life! lol

I would highly recommend the 99 toyota camry or 92 toyota tercel for a REAL gas saver..

my best friend and step father bought their 99 camry brand new and is driving it to this day with only maintance
>>
>>7473384
Unfortunately, the posting has expired and I didn't even save it.

Actually, I screencapped it on my phone, but then I had to restore it because the jailbreak was becoming unstable; the pic wasn't part of the backup.

I'm waiting on my tax refund to arrive and get enough money saved up to get it or something like it.

What's the most reliable FR, btw?
>>
>>7248865
Something else to add
>Common Problems: Tail light bulbs needs frequent changing

One bulb can last a week to half a year.
>>
What do you guys think of Saturns and Geo Metros?
>>
Im only speaking from experience, the cheap cars that I have or my friends have had the best luck with is a Saturn SL1 manual trans (350K when odometer which was 2 years before engine died), Saturn SL1 Auto (280k when I sold it, bought for $500 sold for $400 a few years later and much more wrecked up), 93 S-10 v6 auto (original trans died at 200k), 94 Chrysler Concorde 3.3 v6 auto (my college and late high school car, trans started to slip at 150k used 2 quarts of Lucas stop slip got 5 years out of it, 250k when I sold it, it ran for 2 more years after I sold it, its only off the road because it got totaled) 89 Benz 190E 2.3(250k and still running). Cars to avoid from personal experience 96-01 v6 s10 badly made fuel injection system, my 2001 was in the shop constantly when I first bought it in 03, I updated the fuel injection system to the 02 and up system and it runs like a dream, still own it. 99 Chrysler 300m mechanically it ran great but it had a ton of electrical problems, only owned it a year because I was fed up with fixing electrical crap. 2001 Dodge Ram 2500 v8 5.9,bought at 120k currently has 135k abs never worked, front axle blew up a month into owning it due to poor maintenance, rebuilt axle leaks from side seal 15k later, door latches both broke (had to make plate to strengthen mounting area to reinstall), door hinges bent from door weight, however engine and trans both flawless. 2009 wrangler 4 door, love the car, but the engine spun a bearing at 46k, luckily being the first owner it was replaced under the lifetime warranty, great car if you find one with the motor already replaced as they solved the defect.
>>
How common was the defect in the Jeep?
>>
i like the infographic but I'd change some things.

I'd lessen the focus on body style and focus more on statistical parameters.

Take the case for "Econo boxes" that phrase conjures up ideas of entry level NEW cars. Those cars are small they only get good mpg because they are lighter. When econo box cars make it into the 5k used market they lose most of their most favorable attributes they had when new. They are no longer significantly cheaper then the pricier models they are no longer a new car ether.

Logically speaking it makes more sense to ditch this category and replace it with oh say something like "Basic Transportation" cars chosen for this category should be cheap to maintain and operate in regards to what is available in the American car market. Bu they don't have to be small cars , what they should be actually is cars that are easy to find on the market best sellers that will be easy to find parts for and repair.

Now i know what your going to say what about the mpg's ? Well if fuel is what you care about most then you probably should spend more on a car that has the best fuel consumption. I'd rather see a MPG"s category in its own right with nominations for cars that get exceptional mileage.

If we can get the cheap cars and gas sippers out of the way we can then have categories for cars by performance. Most of the cars in the coupe section could make it into a light sports car category.
>>
File: 1360336015169.jpg-(12 KB, 240x180, wtf-is-this-shit-240x180.jpg)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
I went out of town for a week, and let my buddy use my rsx type s while I was away. When I got back he drove it back and left in a hurry. I went outside to check the car out, and the drivers side wheel is drove back like, an inch. any clue what it is? it must still drive since he drove it back here.
>>
>>7527892
you should also consider deleting your friends irl
>>
>>7527892
he was probably driving like a cunt and smashed a curb with the tire

i would take it to a shop have them quote a price and tell your friend to either pay to fix it or have his fucking legs broken with a bat and his house burned down

after he pays to fix it never speak to him again cause he is a piece of shit
>>
FUCKIGN FINISH THIS STICKY ALLREADY FUCK

ITS BEEN LIKE A YEAR NOW
>>
>>7544883
Yeah what the FUCK is the point of this stick?
>>
>>7546109
It's to help prevent further Wat Car Iz Gud threads from being made..
>>
94-98 Mustang GT or 99-04 Mustang GT?

What should I buy?

I like the look of the 94-98's, but they are kinda common and a lot of plebs drive them in my area.

99-04's seem kinda ricey to me.
>>
>>7547923

94-95 have the 5.0 OHV. Very cheap to mod, but not as good at the earlier foxes. They're heavier.

96-98 have the Non-Pi head 4.6. 215 hp. Meh performance. Make decent power with boost.

99-04 have the Pi heads. 260hp. Alrightish performance. Make decent power with boost.
>>
>>7548070
Very cheap to mod? I heard sn95 5.0's were money pits, that people have dumped loads into and barely cracked 300hp.
>>
>>7548573
sn95 5.0s are hydraulic roller cam engines with the same potential as the older foxbody engines.

heads, cam and intake is the formula to get more power. All three are equally important as if you up grade one thing you need to upgrade the rest so you can have someone spend a fair amount to build a 300 horse motor but a 400 horse motor may not cost so much more because you're replacing the HCI(head, cam intake) with a more aggressive setup. The more agressive parts aren't really going to cost a whole lot more than the mild parts you would buy for the 300 horse build unless you're building a 300 horse motor the cheap route. used heads and intake off an old ford explorer and an aftermarket cam
>>
What is the most reliable FR?
>>
>>7550834
>>7550834
Miata or S2k, whatever you can afford.
>>
>>7551603
>craigslist
>Lowest accepted Miata price - $1600; needs cosmetic work
>Lowest S2000 price - $8,000; no problems

What about a Volvo 240?
http://atlanta.craigslist.org/atl/cto/3512234494.html

The only downside I've heard about them was maintenance cost.

What's the average cost?
>>
>>7553171
I will kill you if you don't buy the 240, the only thing you have to pay for is oil changes, and that ca be done your self, super simple to work on, RWD also it's manual, which is slightly uncommon in US 200k is just getting broken in my friend
>>
>>7553209
I'll have to wait for my tax refunds to arrive.
>>
>looking at other reliable cars
>look at honda accords
>find this http://atlanta.craigslist.org/nat/cto/3571022818.html

>Car had a bad head gasket..So we had got new head internals.
>... bullshit ...
>... more bullshit ...
>Grate car ... Drives grate when up and running... Looks good...not exspincive to work on at all?

>mfw spelling

>mfw image limit
>>
There's no mention of the 1980s Accord.

http://atlanta.craigslist.org/sat/cto/3544173686.html

How good are those?
>>
>>7553736
>http://atlanta.craigslist.org/sat/cto/3544173686.html
That is a bit overpriced for dem miles.
>>
>>7553891
It has a new motor.
>>
>>7553946
I feel bad for you if you think that the rebuilding of a motor is magically going to fix all the wear n tear on the entire chassis and components of the car.
>>
>>7554350
So despite the car having a better engine, you still think they should sell it for $200?
>>
>>7555079
BRO SNATCH THAT SHIT UP RIGHT AWAY GOOD DEAL OUT OF 10

That's what you wanted to hear, just shut the fuck up and go waste your money.
>>
>>7555439
I don't have the money.
>>
I like how this sticky still isn't ready.
>>
>>7563346
I know, the answer is so simple.
Honda Civic.
>>
>read thread
>do some research and price lookups for my area (vancouver, canada)
>grandmothers friend is selling her 2000 honda civic for $3000
>take a look at it
>pristine, drives amazingly, 0 rust, 80,000 km, barely driven, takes it to the manufacturer for checkups often
>jump on that shit


d-did I do good?

[spoiler]only catch is that i need to wait till like october to get it, since shes going to use it till she moves to her old-folks home in september/oct[/spoiler]
>>
>>7568758
>Honda Civic
>The Best

Damn it, we need a new fucking thread.

I can post the reliability image of the Civic between 1988-2010.
>>
>>7570112
>fast typing
*can't
>>
File: 1361038588144.jpg-(64 KB, 501x506, opnews.jpg)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
Hey faggot mod, how about actually finishing this?
>>
>>7574137
We did finish it, the final product is here:

http://i1295.photobucket.com/albums/b638/LongpostGuy/Good_Cheap_Cars.jpg

Plus there is post-able version that's been making the rounds in "wat car iz gud" threads for a while now.

Moot/the mods never got back to me on merging it into the bike sticky and closing this thread.
>>
File: 1361045346757.jpg-(1.55 MB, 1922x2825, OfficialOcarlist.jpg)
1.55 MB
1.55 MB JPG
>>7574166
list is perfect now
>>
>>7574613
lol some one doesn't like fords
>>
>>7574166
Why no w116 under the merc diesels?
And why the sw20 and not aw11?
>>
>>7574659
availability. You can't find them in decent condition for 5K or under. Remember this chart is for car clueless people, not enthusiasts
>>
I noticed the list you guys made, i have not read the entire thread, so point me in the right direction if its already been inquired. But, i'm looking at buying a 99 Sunfire with 168k miles on it. Assuming everything is spot on with the car, is it a good catch ($1800) or should i find something else?
>>
>>7580138
It's very unlikely everything will be "spot on" with a 168k mile Sunfire, and even if it does appear to be in good shape, they're really cheaply assembled cars. I mean, if $1800 is your budget I would look for a high-mileage Accord or Civic first.
>>
well i bought a 2000 corolla with 200000 miles on it its really clean with no check lights on no reported accidents and calculated owners 1.

What are my chances here of having a decent car for a while?
>>
File: 1361373007217.jpg-(69 KB, 628x417, 2013-dodge-dart-628.jpg)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
/o/ I have had a 2010 Corolla since I bought it new and I really like how Dodge Dart looks. Is it a good car? The looks suckering me in? Should I avoid until the 2014s come out and the bugs worked out? Just looking for opinions here.
>>
>>7598964
Ill never understand jumping from one econobox to another. An econobox should last you at least 10 years.
>>
>>7599103

My only thought was it looked better than the Corolla. I drove one as a rental car for a week and I liked it. I wasn't expecting a night and day change but I was looking for a current owner who might suggest it or buy it again.

Recent articles are saying Dodge can't sell them and I was wondering why. A current owner might know.



Delete Post [File Only] Password
Style
[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k] [cm / hm / y] [3 / adv / an / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / hc / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / po / pol / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / wsg / x] [rs] [status / q / @] [Settings] [Home]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

- futaba + yotsuba -
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.