10/10 op clever and original

Everyone makes fun of the V6 mustang here and I doubt many people actually have a car with more horsepower. The 2013 has 305.

my car is faster than a v6 mustang. just not the new ones...

>>7138153 (OP)
>My WRX
>265 bhp
>0-60 takes 4.7s

>V6 Mustang
>305 BHP
>0-60 in 5.8

AMERICA

File: 1353212873444.jpg-(1.47 MB, 2592x1944, IMG_20120426_175755.jpg)

Well.. I guess this counts.

>>7138163
>tfw I don't have that many hp
>only 290

Good thing I can turn it all the way up to 600 with nothing but a screwdriver.

File: 1353212877214.jpg-(101 KB, 432x354, 1352956407114.jpg)

>yanks think horsepower is more important than going round corners

>>7138175
also
>can actually take corners instead of wallowing with
>LIVE
>REAR
>AXEL

>>7138175
>4wd

>Faster than a v6 mustang
>Doesn't specify a year

Welp, my firebird is faster than every v6 up to my respective generation (2000)

Feels good, OP.

Aw fuck, my stock Audi S6 does 0-60 in 6.2s.

Thats not cool, better get my stage 2 chip ordered. Can't be slower than a fucking v6 mustang.

sup guys.

>>7138186

Seems like that live rear axel is more technology than the GT-86 has.

>>7138199
>Because mustang has more power live rear axel is better

no

File: 1353213136705.jpg-(612 KB, 912x913, Bob-Ross.jpg)

>>7138153 (OP)
Butthurt from the other thread where we shit all over you for actually defending a V6 Mustang?

>mfw it's just a kid whose parents wouldn't buy him the GT so he's trying to justify his shit car.

File: 1353213162072.png-(3 KB, 196x171, 1350232558059.png)

>>7138175

Which WRX is that because the fastest STI the GC8 did it in 4.5 and I don't believe Subaru would go to all that trouble developing the STI to shave off 0.2 seconds.

Also the bug eye WRX was rated at 6.7 seconds.

File: 1353213180742.jpg-(318 KB, 578x582, VIRlaps.jpg)

>>7138186
>any year past like 2005
>thinking Mustangs actually can't corner

They're not amazing but they're still head and shoulders above most things on the road. They only pale in comparison to cars that are praised specifically for their handling. And they generally make up the difference in a straight line vs those cars.

Oh, also...
>thinking a stock WRX is faster than a V6 Mustang
I've got bad news, friend.

>>7138213
2009.

It's all in the gearing. The 2012-13 WRX does similar 0-60 runs to the 2009 as well, you can reach 60 in second.

ANYONE WHO BUYS A CAR OR RATES THEIR CAR ON 0-60 TIMES IS A FUCKING RETARD AND SHOULD BE FUCKING MURDERED BY A FUCKING BUS.

That is all.

File: 1353213362070.jpg-(1.66 MB, 3264x2448, DSCN3483.jpg)

TIME PARADOX

>>7138220

But that would mean the 2009 STi is only 0.2 faster.

Well slower. 4.5 is what's quoted for the GC8 STi which isn't carrying almost 20 years of safety features.

File: 1353213489601.jpg-(596 KB, 1600x1200, 1999-chevrolet-cavalier-2(...).jpg)

kekekekekeke

>>7138234
0.2 faster to 60. Because it's a six-speed there's an extra shift. The car is 50bhp more powerful, and that comes into play on the top end.

speaking of v6 mustang, what ever happened to setk?

>>7138214
Weird- mustang has a faster lap time than the STI, but the STI has a higher peak speed.

That would lead me to believe that the mustang was faster in the turns...

>>7138227
This 1000 times

File: 1353213607017.jpg-(20 KB, 220x286, sad.jpg)

>yfw 2013 Mustang V6 is faster than a WRX around a track.

>>7138214
Finally, someone actully show non nigger reasoning. All you faggots are just fanboy niggers who love their faggot as pussy Supras. Seriously, go suck dicks, just cause you are too poor to even afford a poorstang. Besides so what if your car is faster, it looks like a hunk of nigger shit anyways.

>>7138243
No, that's not it. The Mustang's peak speed is low because that's where the limiter kicks in. ~114/115 mph.
The V6 mustang has a weaker drive shaft than the V8 and it's prone to shearing at higher speeds, apparently. Ford limited the top speed on them for that reason. Lots of people have removed the limiter without problems but some have removed the limiter and had their drive shafts go boom.

So yeah. It's not faster in the corners, I don't think. Maybe some of the sweepers.

>>7138241

You mean people will actually pay for 0.2 seconds and a badge?

File: 1353213730856.jpg-(53 KB, 449x816, 20121026_051241-2.jpg)

And yet, v6 mustangs always try to race me.

File: 1353213735096.jpg-(93 KB, 800x600, P6010185.jpg)

>>7138236

Yep, they all are so slow

Are we talking our car stock or as is?

>too poor to even afford a poorstang

Yet, they own Supras. That sounds like a conscious decision to me.

>>7138255
DID YOU NOT READ

50 EXTRA BHP AND BETTER TOP END

>>7138261

Which equates to 0.2 shaved off 0-60 hardly seems worth it.

I bet you could easily get that 50hp from the WRX too.

>>7138248
>faggot as pussy Supras
>too poor to even afford a poorstang
there's so much wrong here i don't even know where to begin

>>7138257
>lol@trendy black wheels

>>7138257
I tried racing a 2011 v6 today in my 2000 v6. He blew the doors off of me but it was fun regardless

>>7138248
Well.. I'm as big a Mustang fanboy as anyone else but I'm not retarded enough to think they're the best car or any shit like that. They are just (in my opinion) the best car you can get for the money so I am a fan of them and I own one. That's really what it boils down to, I guess.

Anyone who blindly fanboys for any car without considering that there are both positives and negatives to it is a fucking retard. For me, the biggest letdown of the Mustang isn't how it corners (because it does that quite well) it's the completely numb steering feel. It's like driving through a video game controller, my fucking Range Rover has more steering feel.

>>7138251

So the mustang is slower on the straights, and on the turns- but still has a faster lap time?

>>7138274

I think Pink is the tend, black was trendy 5 years ago.

>>7138153 (OP)
My car's faster than a V6 Mustang :3

>>7138280
No, it's faster on the straights. It's just slower on the MAIN straight and probably only for a short period of time while it bounces off the rev limiter.

It accelerates faster. And to be realistic, probably has similar corner speeds as well in all but the slowest corners.

>>7138266
I agree, it's not worth it, and you can get the power out of the WRX. But you're not paying for the retarded 0-60 spec, you're paying for all the extra diff gizmos and shit, and the extra power.

Still not worth it.

>>7138284
No, every stupid nigger fag has them on his car. Even car makers are offering them as OEM wheels. My jimmies test positive for rustled.

File: 1353214211219.jpg-(823 KB, 1920x1081, internet use.jpg)

Faster than almost everyone on /o/

File: 1353214236992.jpg-(117 KB, 770x577, 79431.jpg)

>>7138292

Personally I'd get a 2.5 RS and tune it into an STI killer.

Picture semi related

>>7138303
10/10 would bang

>>7138295
>every stupid nigger has it
>implying a trend's not over once the stupid niggers start doing it

File: 1353214364314.jpg-(390 KB, 1024x768, DSC01685.jpg)

Hi guys.

>>7138307

Is it really an STi killer when you have to put an STi engine in it?

>>7138276
Lol, they ALWAYS try racing me, its fucking annoying. I think its cause my car is loud, people think I'm revving my engine or something.
>>7138274
Plastidip mofuka

>>7138321
>Semi Related

>>7138317
Fine. I correct to:

once every faggot ass monster-chugging brody has them.

>>7138319

The only Honda I'd own

File: 1353214916572.jpg-(147 KB, 612x612, image.jpg)

ITT: Mad bench racers and humble masterrace

My 2006 ford taurus eats v6 mustangs.

1997 Euro E36 M3. 0-60 in 5.2sec.

My 15-year old third-hand car is faster than your brand new rustang. Also gets more bitches.

File: 1353217889550.jpg-(23 KB, 337x425, 138263-james_bond_sean_connery.jpg)

>>7138594
>My 15-year old third-hand car is faster than your brand new rustang.

And therefore even faster than the 86

My WRX has beaten an older V6, but I cant even come close to hanging with the new ones.

ISF here.

Good thread is Good

>'13 STi

File: 1353220889597.jpg-(35 KB, 492x452, demotivational-posters-ha-ha.jpg)

MFW R6 dusts you all.

File: 1353221025764.gif-(930 KB, 200x133, 1344333395127.gif)

I'm in

yup.

not even trying hard.

5.7 Hemi reporting in.

File: 1353221950385.jpg-(107 KB, 1200x900, Optimized-DSCN1142.jpg)

pretty sure I'm good

File: 1353222079223.jpg-(303 KB, 972x729, WP_000198.jpg)

>>7138831
how much did that cost you?

i'd take the 'stang through the corners any day.

File: 1353222131066.jpg-(1.19 MB, 2048x1536, photo.jpg)

I'm in.
>pic related

File: 1353222547682.jpg-(402 KB, 1280x960, 0504121135.jpg)

Hellllll yeah.

File: 1353222591355.jpg-(60 KB, 960x717, trd-toyota-86.jpg)

Im in

File: 1353222779995.jpg-(1.29 MB, 3264x1952, IMAG0090.jpg)

Faster and I can turn. Fuck. Yes.

>>7138178

>U.S. has massive highway system with long open roads

europoor thinks it isn't

File: 1353223212440.jpg-(2.57 MB, 3040x1200, IMG_0960.jpg)

All three.

1996 240sx (S14) checking in. Mostly driftcar but sometimes racecar.

Sr20det
Rocker arm stoppers
Isis intake
Battery relocated in the trunk
Stock T25 turbo
HKS blow off valve
Front mount intercooler
5 speed trans

Powered bye max Coil-over's
Megan sway bar's (front and rear)
Megan lower control arm's
Megan inner and outer tie rod's
Megan rear camber control plate's
Megan front and rear strut tower bar's
Pretty much all the suspension underneath is aftermarket

Stock Rims/Tires but painted black (left them stock for ease of finding used tires for drifting)

poasting

File: 1353223621645.jpg-(439 KB, 948x502, rustangperformance.jpg)

just gonna leave this here

>>7138907

>1992

the one on the left is 99-04

>>7138833
bout tree fiddy
or about 20k for the kit, 35k-ish completed

>>7138907

>1992

Posts picture of 2003 Mustang.

>>7138910
I think its a 2000 cobra r with a 5.4 modular and solid rear axle. Not that anyone really cares, just saying

and one isolated incident of some dickwad crashing their car doesnt mean the car is shit. Come on, I'm sure you had to have taken a critical thinking class at some point in your life

>>7138594
>e36
>good

>>7138913
Arent you a teenager?

>daddies money

>>7138303
Except everyone that owns a 600cc or above bike.

>>7138931
>one isolated incident
repeated failure proven to be fatal =/= isolated incident

>>7138965
and that's before turns are involved

e30 fag here
318 fuckkkkkk

Faster in what area? 0-60? Quarter mile? Top speed? Slalom? Nurburgring?

File: 1353225673819.jpg-(932 KB, 1920x1440, DSCN1824.jpg)

>>7138965
>implying bikes count
>>7138980
>implying terminators cant turn
you drive a late 70s firebird, you own the worst handling car on /o/

>>7139020
implying having some half assed IRS setup that they threw together out of parts bin equipment makes that abortion of a car handle well

File: 1353225999041.jpg-(1.19 MB, 1224x1632, rsz_moostangengine.jpg)

gay v6 mustang owner reporting in. I'm new to manual and have 2.73 gears for now so most of you could probably beat me in a race and feel better. This intake adds at LEAST 75 hp though.

>>7139020
Bikes always count.

>>7139020
Is that an IRS brace I see? Good.

And I've got you on handling. Still.

File: 1353226062088.jpg-(1.15 MB, 1224x1632, rsz_exhaust1.jpg)

>>7139033

and this exhaust adds probably 80-100hp

>>7139020

i think you need wider rears

File: 1353226675771.jpg-(42 KB, 420x309, blk18X9fr500rims_lg[1].jpg)

>>7138303

Although it's a bit played out, why don't you get FR500s?

File: 1353226807031.jpg-(39 KB, 500x351, ferrariwreck[1].jpg)

>>7138907

0/10

File: 1353227293702.jpg-(472 KB, 1024x768, 1013124.jpg)

>>7138303

>>7138303
The bank must be very proud of their 10 year old mustang

>>7138153 (OP)

>Post thread about "fast" v6 mustang
>No one mentions Performance Package

Implying the non-PP v6 mustang is worth anything? Never mind that there are already rare with only 1.8% of v6 mustangs equipped with the package.

Stop using the benchmarks set by a car that 98% of v6 mustangs do not have anything in common with.

>/o/
>Benchmark general

>>7139293

I own one with the PP, and you are right. Still though, it's a factory option and only $2000 so it is absolutely relevant.

>>7139299

I meant without the performance package

>>7138175

5.1 with the 3.73.

>awd clutch dumps

>>7139020

I bet my Jeep handles better than henry's flamingbird.

File: 1353230217892.jpg-(489 KB, 1920x1080, 1343852482986.jpg)

>>7138153 (OP)

>live rear axle
>2012

>>7138153 (OP)

I'm a good 2 seconds faster round my local track than the 2012 stang in my GT86 then again I'm not paid off by ford to say otherwise.

File: 1353231114207.jpg-(37 KB, 490x700, 1353111033712.jpg)

Jesus Christ Mustang fanboys are sad. 20+ years of N/A V6/4cyl Mustang models being called girl cars, bitch mobiles, and not real cars really hurt their egos. Now they're just overcompensating constantly making shitposts now that their car's base trim grew a pair, trying to make up for 20+ years of butthurt and analpain.

We get it, the V6 Mustang is fast now. Stop compensating.

>>7139333

Guessing you are running track prepped like everyone else at a track with proper tires, pads, and suspension tune.

They will still quote the Road and Track track test with the BRZ on prius tires.

>>7138876
What the point of 300+hp if you can't go past 80mph?

>>7139401

wat

08 Jetta Wolfsburg.

2.0, with a turbo. It's got the auto-manual transmission as well. I'm putting about about 210hp by most estimates, but I'm pretty sure I'd top out at about 140mph. I might take longer getting up there, but I could probably out drive most people who own a V6 Mustang, and according to the guy who said the V6 version's drive shaft shears out, I could outpace 110 easy.

File: 1353233265554.jpg-(13 KB, 268x311, 1264984662982.jpg)

>>7138241
>>0.2 faster to 60. Because it's a six-speed there's an extra shift.
>>Because it's a six-speed there's an extra shift.
>>extra shift.
>>using all 6 gears to get to 60mph

>>da fuck confirmed for retard

>>7139428

5 speed - Pull from first to second all the way to 60.

STI's 6 speed - First to second and then a shift to third to get it to sixty

Due to shorter gearing.

You are fucking retarded.

>>7139433
gearing is different, but to get to 60 why would you shift into 3rd? no sense

>>7139455
Because of short gears?

>>7139455

Because redline....

My 6 speed is the same way.

huh..always wanted to find out if i get to sixty in second gear. makes me wonder why i never just did.

my car is faster than a v6 mustang, yes.

I can almost hit 100 in 4th but it's better to shift to 5th because it puts the engine in a better power range. I can go all the way down to 25 MPH in 6th and back up to freeway speeds without lugging the engine.

Off-road gearing master race here.

>>7139387

Nope just stock, with budget rubber bands on cheapo alloys.

>>7138175

GT-86 takes 5.3

File: 1353258424575.jpg-(1.78 MB, 3264x2448, DSCN0232.jpg)

95 Nissan skyline r33 gtr
420 hp, at the wheel
Soon to be 600+

>>7138956
>implying implications
no.

Lets be reasonable people. Here in the US, we have long straight roads. Heck, i spend most of my time ont he highway. I dont find myself diving through corners that often, and my v8 GT 2006 is really fun on the highway! Super easy to pass cars too. I can understand the need for the turning where you're driving through curvy roads, but i literally never find myself diving corners except on exit ramps, and i do fine there anyway. I dont understand all this hubbub! Everyone has a preference.

>>7141740
This is the internet. Opinions are always wrong, 100% of the time. You are required to argue another person's opinion by the laws of the internet.

>>7140388

> 420 hp, at the wheel

Which one?

File: 1353278907363.jpg-(78 KB, 500x375, Horse Car.jpg)

>>7141819

The steering wheel.

>>7141740

What?

There are MANY areas with a ton of hills and windy country roads. America is a huge fucking place. I am in Oregon and there are windy country roads EVERYWHERE.

You must live in Florida or Texas or Oklahoma...

>>7141900
those arent the kinds of curves you see in europe though. They have real curves, and why they have cars made for the real curves. We dont have them as sharp.

File: 1353282078138.jpg-(6 KB, 225x225, images.jpg)

>tfw 2004 v6 mustang

File: 1353282400745.jpg-(115 KB, 750x600, 1349141749110.jpg)

>>7138153 (OP)

well even my 100 hp civic is faster on a twisty road
i dont need to brake so hard to take a turn.
>op probably means 0-60 in a straight line

>>7142024
>this is what ricers really think

>>7142029
the suspension is so hard my kidneys are hurting right now
eurospec civic is a complete different car than the sedan version

File: 1353282724222.jpg-(121 KB, 600x450, absolutely heretical.jpg)

>V6 Mustang

File: 1353283146090.jpg-(381 KB, 1410x940, 1327814951655.jpg)

>that feel when my Maxima was as fast as the V8 Mustang of its year

>that feel when the V8 Mustang finally got faster

>that feel when now the V6 is faster

>>7142024

Perhaps surprisingly, there are things that turn even less than Mustangs, such as econoboxes.

>>7142060
:*

>2012 Camry V6
>0-60 in 5.7 stock
LEL

>>7142109

Altima coupe is 5.7 as well, with 35 less horsepower.

Funny shit.

>>7142109
What is your point?

Whoooo I made it into the club

File: 1353284163315.jpg-(2 KB, 101x126, 1306277359603s.jpg)

yo

>>7142120
Was highly considering it, but dealing with a car seat in a coupe would have been painful

>>7142124

That a Mustang is being beat by a Camry.

Can I be in the club if I can get to 60 in 8 seconds while weighing 4500lb, being over 10 years old, and having the aerodynamic properties of a brick?

>>7142155

No.

Fuck off.

Your car sucks and you should feel bad.

>>7142158
I'm coming in the club anyways I don't even give a fuck

DYEL?

>>7142154
In what? 0-60 times? Since when does that set the performance bar to anyone who actually matters to the automotive community? The Camry is still a boring beige sedan with a powerful motor. It could have a sideways goddamn 426 hemi and it would be boring with a ton of wrong wheel drive power.

Fuckin' bench racers, man.

I have a gt-86 with performance tyres

I'm allowed to post

>>7142169

>In what? 0-60 times? Since when does that set the performance bar to anyone who actually matters to the automotive community?

Mustangs are straight line performance machines, the Mustang is being beat on the one quality that Mustang owners boast about.

>The Camry is still a boring beige sedan with a powerful motor.

And the mustang is still a soccormom non-sportscar with a truck interior and 1950's suspension. It's about as boring to me.

File: 1353284894980.png-(356 KB, 1440x1280, wat.png)

>>7142174
>you spent nearly $800 on Prius performance tires

>>7142182
What I just saw when I googled both 0-60 times, is the 2013 mustang V6 is 5.1-5.3 seconds, and the 2013 camry is 5.7

>>7142182
I happen to think the Mustang GT is a fine sports car for what it is and at its price point.

Anyone who buys a V6 pony car has no business claiming any sports/performance claims.

>>7142182
It''s funny when 1950's technology can go toe to toe with an M3, isn't it?

>>7142192

>prius performance tires

what does that even mean? what are you implying?

>>7142200
>inb4 anus aching Euro owners/fans start spouting hopelessly defensive retorts

>>7142200
Not really, because Ford uses an old ass V8 that is tired as shit, they just work the fuck out of it.

BMW is about progression, having a world renown i6 in earlier M3s that would demolish just about any other stock motor from the regular automotive companies.

The new 4L M3 V8 has a redline of 8300 RPM and has peak torque at 3900 RPM. Plus, you have to remember that the M3 is carrying a lot more technology and creature comforts. The ford is basically a bare bones sports car. Most of the weight is from its heavy ass axles and suspension.

Anyone can engineer a big go-kart with a huge engine and have it handle well and go fast, but bringing a sense of refinement into the cab for the driver is why the M3 costs so much more. There's a lot more road dampening, less noise inside the cab, and better steering feel.

This is the truth, whether or not you accept it. No, you aren't paying for a badge with these high end euro companies, you are paying for the extensive R&D that goes into making an all around better vehicle, better fit and finish, better material build, more technology. It's called advancement, and it's something that most American companies seem to be against, or will con out of other manufacturers. Sad, but true.

File: 1353285756642.jpg-(89 KB, 465x619, 4876696414_d3f62d18be_z.jpg)

>>7142212
>>7142224

>>7142224
But the Mustang is better

>>7142229

Gee, you must be some kind of Nostradamus for calling that! I never would have expected someone to actually defend their point against a blatantly dumb remark!

>>7142233
But the M3 is better.

>>7142241
>yurop

>>7142244
>united claps of americhin

File: 1353286143321.png-(446 KB, 640x960, 031.png)

>>7142238
I am not
>>7142212
but thank you for your concern.

File: 1353286196585.jpg-(232 KB, 1280x1024, 1299211621081.jpg)

>>7142224
getaloadofthisguy.jpg

>>7140341
on what fucking planet?

>>7141819
EACH


i go hard, mothafucka

>>7142262
>>7142244

That's nice, so where's your counter argument? Oh that's right, you don't have one.

I had almost forgotten that this board is dominated by 16 year olds who have no real knowledge of anything automotive related whatsoever.

>>7142276
You are this mad

File: 1353286685777.jpg-(17 KB, 281x360, you.jpg)

>>7142279
>too dumb to retort

I know, I'll just call him mad!

File: 1353286722546.jpg-(33 KB, 319x240, 058.jpg)

>>7142276
>He mad

>>7142154
thats the camry se v6 package which costs 27,000.

The mustang is 24 with track pack.

>>7142276
It's okay buddy, relax. There are no girls to impress on the internet. No need to get all hormonal around a bunch of other dudes.

File: 1353286807016.jpg-(1.08 MB, 3264x1840, 2012-09-03_16-00-20_200.jpg)

>V6 Mustang
COME AT ME BRO

captcha: settowhs weak

>>7142303
This would make sense, if I were the dunce in this situation. Is this how you cop out during real life debate as well? Nah, you're too beta to speak up around men.

>>7142305
I've seen your car in two threads now.

I'm just stopping in to tell you how much I admire your taste in automobiles. Have a nice day.

File: 1353286968568.jpg-(1.14 MB, 3264x1840, 2012-09-03_16-04-25_650.jpg)

>>7138153 (OP)

>V6 Mustang
COME AT ME BRO

captcha: settowhs weak

File: 1353287055808.jpg-(887 KB, 1936x1936, IMG_20121012_135807.jpg)

>>7142200
>can go toe to toe with an M3

>this is what musclefags actually believe

File: 1353287365818.jpg-(406 KB, 1280x854, 1318814164751.jpg)

Did someone say V6?

>>7142363
Are those RPF1's? I've been wanting some for my STi.

>>7142363

You appear to think that I'm not poor and am posting a vehicle I own

>>7142302

I don't think anyone is going to argue on pricepoint, since that's the one good thing mustangs have: Acceleration/$

Mustangs are an engine on wheels, everything else on the car is shitty, but both the V6 and V8 are the cheapest speed you can buy.

>>7142328
>Mustang GT was only .9 of a second slower than the M3 on the track