Anyone that actually reacts to this or feels the need to prove how anti-Islam they are is a moron.

/new/ is so terrible at weekends. More than usual, I mean.

>>721432
>Anyone that actually reacts to this or feels the need to prove how anti-Islam they are is being trolled.
Fix'd

>they see me trollen
>they haten

>>721428
oh....well....fuck you

this guy loves spout absurdity, like that, because he can.
inb4 "confused"

>Men are not equal, hierarchy exists everywhere.
True

>Democracy is the worst governing system in history.
True

the rest is gay

>Mohamed
nice spelling retard

>>721473
i sens potential samefaging.

>>721493
My name is معمد, "Mohamed" is the Latin transliteration in my birth certificate.

>>721513
That's Arabic for "immersed". You're a shitty troll.

>>721522
I meant محمد, the font is so small you can hardly see anything. معمد actually meant baptized.

>>721428
Then why is it I can draw pics of Moha-hamahamahamaha-mmad

and invisible-god-in-the-sky-arabic-version doesn't strike me down?

OH SNAP

Atheist 1
Religious Nuts 0

Mohammad

he mad

>>721596
Mouloud he's...loud.

>>721556
You can't possbily think that everyone that does something unlawful gets stricken down!

Si iniquitates observaveris Domine: Domine quis sustinebit?

But if you continue on your ways, you will be stricken harder than any lightening can strike.

>>721648
prove it.

>>721648
Based on what? You're not "god"

you're full of shit

>>721672
How can I prove something of the supra-physical order with a set of rules made specifically to explain physical phenomenas?

>>721696
I was intending to put a "probably" there but my fingers failed me. I hope this fixes it.

Je suppose que tu lis également le français?
comment tu trouve celui la, sympa non?

>>721712
>How can I prove something of the supra-physical order with a set of rules made specifically to explain physical phenomenas?

==

>I'm too stupid and ignorant to explain anything.

>>721754
C'est pas bien biensure, pourquoi je dirais le contraire?

Encore un autre, par malice.

A man walks down a road late at night and he a sees a door open and a woman standing naked in a shower. He instantly sprouts a boner and things about having his way with her.

Does he rape her because he has no morals? Does he not rape her because he was a Christian/Jew/Muslim/Etc?

or does he just rape her because he knows he'll never get caught?

The woman is a devout something or other and the man a devout something or other, will the almighty hand of whatever god the woman worships protect her from this man just because she prays to him? Is there any guarantee of this? She as well as the man who will rape her are "devout" followers of their respective religions yet he still rapes the woman. Religion saved neither of these people just like if they were both atheists the man would be just as likely to rape the woman.

>>721754
Heuresement, ça n'existe nulle part.

De? d'envoyer des gosses au front? mais tu plaisante!

>>721765
What I said is that the reason why his ways lead to his doom can not be explained through natural, physcial science which I'm sure is the only explaination he'll except. Unless, perhaps, we take take this "doom" in a metaphoric and earthly sense.

Theist: "So who is your moral authority then without God?"
Atheist: "I am."

>>721428

Shut up and get out of here you stupid nigger

>>721797
>IL A ENCORE UN AMI IMAGINAIRE A SON AGE

Putain même ici ils nous laisserons pas tranquille. Je retourne sur Underfoule.

>>721864
You will be grossly deceiving yourself and confused (yes, >>721466) if you thought that:
1) The modern "free thinking" atheists don't dogmatically follow the dotrines of the "enlightenment" and what it begotted.
2) The majority of people have the intellectual capacity to make any thinking of this propotion with any independence (let alone with complete independence as you suggest).

>>721850
so far, it's superstitious bullshit and also a subtle attempt to intimidation, that's what you do.
so listen, your bearded man, nine year old lover can go fuck himself, and you with him.
how about some crude words to help you understand how much i care about you?

>>721894
c'est ca, retourne dans ton cloaque.

1) The modern "free thinking" atheists don't dogmatically follow the dotrines of the "enlightenment" and what it begotted.
>Sorry don't follow Christian trends. LOL.
2) The majority of people have the intellectual capacity to make any thinking of this propotion with any independence (let alone with complete independence as you suggest).
>People are stupid and are thus easily controlled. I follow NO ONE. Though George Carlin was a god in his own right.

>Men are not equal, hierarchy exists everywhere.

Yes but all have equal potential, and all deserve the same rights.

>Democracy is the worst governing system in history.

Except all the others.

>>721904
People only lack the intellectual capacity because they were hammered dumb by blind dogma and too scared to think due to tyrannical clergy enforcing barbaric doctrines.

You expose yourself as the enemy of reason.

Humans and their silly autonomous religions...
They really have no idea...

>>721948
Sorry, I don't know if the yellow is a parody to what I wrote or your reply to it. If it's the latter, than you're hugely misinformed if you think the "enlightenment" (I'll keep using quote amrks because the movement is far from being an enlightenment) is a Christian trend and that it's not the root of the modern doctrines.

Please don't take it as an insulte, but you need to educate yourself about the subject.

What do you think of Jews?

>>722005
>insulte

>>722020
In what sense?

All prophets (including those that you may consider to be jews) are superior to all other humans. Thier follows were (are?) our models.

I'm indeffernt to Jews as an ethnicity.

>>722039
i love this reaction op, what about you?
are you enjoying it as much as i do?

Yeah, Islam isn't against physical science or democracy.

>>722058
are you by any chance considering yourself as a prophet? (superior to all other humans)

>>721437
I like how moot brought back /new/, warning it not to become /stormfront/.
5 threads later, it becomes /stormfront/ with actual news sprinkled in between.

>>722126
Ofcourse not, not even remotely close.

>>722164
So, you accept the fact that a jew prophet could be superior to you?

>>722219
More than gladly.

>>722227
is it just plain hypocrisy, or you're not what you claim to be?

>>722240
Care to elaborate?

>>722240
No?

Did op misspell Muhammad on purpose?

>>722425

Come on OP, I'm being serious. Why did you misspell the name if you're not trolling, which I think you are.

>>722461

Mohamed is my actual name, it's the one I have in my ID next to the original arabic.
Mohamed, Mohammed, Mehmet, mamadou, mouhand are all variants of the name among others.

>>722489

Whats the deal with not being able to show pictures of the prophet, I don't get it. Enlighten me please.

Well, the consensus is that all depiction of humans and animals is forbidden, hence the abstract nature of Islamic art. Emphasis is made on Prophets.

>>722533

Wait.. are you serious? So why don't you guys get up in arms when you see cartoons on TV?

Enjoy /new/.

>>722640
ty anon