>> |
!!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)16:04 No.692362>>692302 Ethical and
moral complications. That, and the care and treatment for those people
provide jobs.
>>692318 That's
a tough question.
The short answer: no.
The long
answer, somewhat. A lot of the very, very analytical and rigorous
paradigms and sub-discplines (like ethnomethodologists, demographers,
conversation analysts) have defined processes that do show repeatable
results (like pauses in conversations, applauding at certain points,
population trends). There have been a great deal amount of ink spilled
over how to systematically analysis a conversation; believe it or not,
it's actually an insanely rigorous process (I can't give you details, as
I've just read results from CA studies, and not these manuals of sort)
But, a lot of the more anti-positivistic paradigms (like symbolic
interactionism) are a lot less rigorous and have a lot more difficult
time producing repeatable results, and these 'softer' parts of sociology
tend to be the ones most people associate with the discipline. |