Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • File : 1271878278.jpg-(35 KB, 280x390, max_weber.jpg)
    35 KB The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)15:31 No.692135  
    I like doing these threads, so ask a sociologyfag anything.

    Please note that answers I give out do not necessarily represent my opinion.
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:32 No.692146
    so why'd you choose such a loser course?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:33 No.692155
    TELL US ABOUT THE BYSTANDER EFFECT AGAIN

    But no really, uh, how about them exploding populations, eh?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:33 No.692158
    Why are you a Communist?

    And if you are one of the rare non-Commie sociofags, what is your opinion of Communism?
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)15:35 No.692176
    >>692146
    I'm a statistics major. I just really like sociology.

    >>692155
    Actually, I've read estimates by the UN that predict the population growth will level off by 2050, and UN tends to make predictions on the radical side.

    Lemme find the study for you, hold on.

    >>692158
    No, I am not a communist. I think studying and reading Marx is interesting, but his ideas are undeniably out of date.
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)15:37 No.692191
    >>692176
    http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/longrange2/WorldPop2300final.pdf

    Here's the UN study I referred to.
    >In these projections, world population peaks at
    9.22 billion in 2075. Population therefore grows
    slightly beyond the level of 8.92 billion projected for 2050 in the 2002 Revision, on which these projections are based. However, after reaching its
    maximum, world population declines slightly and
    then resumes increasing, slowly, to reach a level of 8.97 billion by 2300, not much different from
    the projected 2050 figure.
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)15:42 No.692222
    >>692191
    Failgreentext, but whatever.
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:42 No.692223
    How do we defeat Islam? I think banning circumcision would be a good start.
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)15:45 No.692240
    >>692223
    Most research on assimilation suggests that 1st generation immigrants can never fully assimilate into a culture-- it takes three generations for an immigrant to fully assimilate into a culture.
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:45 No.692241
    >>692135
    1. How did you became interested in sociology?

    2. Why Marx's idea's are out of date?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:48 No.692251
    Around my parts there's quite a bit of tension between the Natural Science Majors and the Social Science Majors. Something about social science majors not being rigorous enough.

    How do you feel about this?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:48 No.692255
    hey is my keyboard broken
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:51 No.692265
    >>692240
    We want a gameplan for stopping Islam.
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:52 No.692276
    >>692265
    Step 1:Bomb Mecca

    Hell, why not include the jews?
    Step 1: Bomb Mecca and Jerusalem
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:53 No.692287
    >>692265
    >>692276
    Will not work.

    To stop Islam, let Muslims immigrate. As they're exposed to a wealth of information and different cultures, eventually it'll get to them.
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)15:54 No.692289
    >>692241
    1. I think I became interested when I read some overviews on Durkheim's work on suicide in this shitty intro class I took. I went online and began to read a lot of Durkheim, and thought it was really amazing stuff. So I've done my own readings since, and I am sincerely interested in sociology. It's really amazing to make something that seems unsystematic predicable (conversation analysis = the shit)

    2. His view on not only labor but class are very outdated. The core concepts of his work are very enduring, but if you read it at face value, then it's quite easy to tell what time period he wrote in.

    But, Marx does have a dedicated fan base that has done a shitton of "modernization" on his original theories.

    >>692251
    I'm majoring in statistics for a reason :3. At the undergrad level, I do think that there isn't much rigor to a social science degree. Most of what I know is logical application of theories I've read about and my own research.

    >>692265
    Wait a few generations?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:54 No.692290
    >>692287
    See: Western Europe
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:55 No.692302
    Why don't we just kill off the retarded people(people with severe mental disabilities) who just cost tax dollars and do nothing else?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)15:58 No.692318
    >>692289
    Are there any laws that sociology produces. One that never fails to work, and results in clear, observable, repeatable patterns?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)16:02 No.692347
    >>692318
    OH SNAP
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)16:03 No.692353
    What practical use does sociology have when so much of it is politicised (beyond coming up with propoganda)? If it does have a practical use, then how is it any different from philosophy where you only need a few very good philosophers?
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)16:04 No.692362
    >>692302
    Ethical and moral complications. That, and the care and treatment for those people provide jobs.

    >>692318
    That's a tough question.

    The short answer: no.

    The long answer, somewhat. A lot of the very, very analytical and rigorous paradigms and sub-discplines (like ethnomethodologists, demographers, conversation analysts) have defined processes that do show repeatable results (like pauses in conversations, applauding at certain points, population trends). There have been a great deal amount of ink spilled over how to systematically analysis a conversation; believe it or not, it's actually an insanely rigorous process (I can't give you details, as I've just read results from CA studies, and not these manuals of sort) But, a lot of the more anti-positivistic paradigms (like symbolic interactionism) are a lot less rigorous and have a lot more difficult time producing repeatable results, and these 'softer' parts of sociology tend to be the ones most people associate with the discipline.
    >> The Sociologist !!NbHprB1uJmF 04/21/10(Wed)16:10 No.692416
    >>692353
    At the moment, the applications of sociology are somewhat limited. But, it is being pushed HEAVILY by many of the top sociology departments in the nation and a new practice in sociology has developed call "public sociology" to answer the question you've asked. If you are interested in a better answer to the question, go read the wiki and do a JSTOR search on Public Sociology.
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)16:15 No.692457
    How is Sociology can be connected to Government and Politics?
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)16:26 No.692520
         File1271881574.jpg-(37 KB, 381x380, 1271360598167.jpg)
    37 KB
    >>692362
    >Ethics
    >Morals
    >> Anonymous 04/21/10(Wed)18:29 No.693407
    >>692287
    Ask the UK how this one is working



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]AnonymousChina's Mobile ...
    [V][X]AnonymousChina tries to ...
    [V][X]AnonymousHow has 4chan c...
    [V][X]The Sociol...!!NbHprB1uJmF
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousA Conclusion of...
    [V][X]AnonymousReport: China T...
    [V][X]AnonymousAre blacks assi...