> Rush

You best be trollin

I understand completely. I've always been more moderate, but some of the things that Rush etc say really turn me away.

>>691780
Rush is a shitty band anyway, so it still applies.

I'm glad the Republicans are pulling the shit they're doing. Eventually they are going to cross the line and push out all their moderate supporters, who make up the majority of the base, leaving them with a small group of fuckwits who will never accomplish anything.

At least I hope that's what happens.

Listening to Rush right now, he's defending the Branch davidian cult, because Clinton.

THIS is what op is talking about.

>>691767
okay i know how you can see how trusting these people and listening to their fear mongering is nuts.
but do you know what most people are? not just america, i mean the ENTIRE WORLD.
they're retards.
they don't understand shit. they can't discern when someone is blowing something out of proportion versus when someone isn't. AND GEE, WHAT COMES FROM IGNORANCE?
fear. if you can make the ignorant, retarded masses afraid of something, they'll be on your side. they'll panic, they'll look to someone they can trust because they certainly don't know what to do. so they turn to beck and hannity, and limbaugh.
then, you tell them you can fight that thing, but ONLY if you do exactly what they say. and they'll fuckin' listen, because they want to help.

but this has all been rather tangential and roundabout so i'm going back to your post.
these people, these idiots blow shit out of proportion. they shoot feds and abortionists and gays because GLENN BECK SES THURR EVUL.

okay wait
stopping rant time, going back to your post.

people support the pundits for that reason: PEOPLE FOLLOW THEM. like it or not, they have a degree of charisma and a hell of a lot of sway over the average retard.
and since most conservatives are GOD DAMN ANCIENT, they trust the pundits to do the talking and the swaying and the speeches for them.

tada

>implying liberals and conservatives aren't both fearmongering like there's no tomorrow

Playing to peoples fears and insecurities is how you get action in politics. There's nothing partisan about it.

If you want your agenda to get passed, you need to create as strong a sense of urgency as possible.

>>691813
>he's defending the Branch davidian cult

the fact of the matter is that they weren't hurting anyone doing what they were doing. and i don't think they ever would. let them stock pile guns and ammo and shoot them out in the desert. the only laws they broke was that nutjob koresh fucked some of the kids i think and they didnt have a tax stamp on the machineguns.

>>691858

>the only laws they broke was that nutjob koresh fucked some of the kids

lol. yeah! no problem! of course limbaugh would support that. now all these stupid limbaugh fans are stupidly and unknowingly pedophile sympathizers. god conservatives are fucking morons.

>doesnt realize that you don't need to be a dumbass to believe in the things that conservatives believe.

i genuinely like glenn, ann and sean. they believe in better times past. just like me. just like alot of people. not all progression is good progression, alot of people are happy with the way things are, or were back in the day. i don't like social change. by all means, invent new shit and do more scientific research but leave the fundimental things which make america what it is alone.

>>691874
You know this makes perfect sense to me, I never viewed it in this light before.

>>691874

Following this logic, only rich white men would be able to participate in any part of the voting process.

>>691910
..and? lol

>>691874
>>691903
samefaggin it up

>>691910
i might be being really dense but i don't understand lol. all citizens should vote. i think as long as the conservatives are the majority and have majority vote we can preserve this country. hopefully we will get back in power in 1012 if we have a good candidate like ron or the huck. they are both real conservatives. john mccain was pretty liberal.

>>691910

sounds good to me

>>691929
So you wouldn't get a vote, faggot.

>>691942
I'm saying that, using your logic of "Not allowing society to move forward socially", we'd still have slaves, women wouldn't be able to vote, etc.

>>691942

>1012

funny, that's what it's like when conservatives are in power.

these people you mention were never meant to win over moderates, they're are in place to stir up the base.

>>691947
>we'd still have slaves, women wouldn't be able to vote, etc

oh lol. ok then, not changing anything socially from now.

>>691964

Now's not perfect though, so why should we halt social progress?

>>691972
>"progress"

personally, i think things are fine how they are. i don't walk around my town and look around and think. "man ... things could be so much better". any changes made and any "progression" would just make the country more liberal. and i don't want that.

>>691990

>More liberal

What's wrong with that? What's wrong with increasing the liberty of the individual, so long as it doesn't infringe on the liberty of others? Gay Marriage comes to mind as a good example of an area where we have room to improve, for instance.

>>691990
So you're the reason I'll never get a government run brothel which also sells weed at fair prices. It would erase the national debt in a matter of months.

>>692000
i respect your opinion but i disagree with it. i believe that the traditional marriage between one man and one woman should be preserved. its a tradition, religious in nature that has remained unchanged for thousands of years. thats what a tradition is, it remains unchanged. marriage by definition is one man and one woman, we have pregressed though to a certain extent and gays are allowed their own unity ('civil unions'). but marriage is for straight people. to demand a 'right' of a group which you dont belong to is kinda stupid.

i always liken it to white people wanting to use the word nigger "baww why cant we use that .. blacks are allowed so why arent we?". the simple answer is that it is becasue we are not black. it is a black word traditionally used by blacks. to damnad that us white folk be able to use it is retarded becasue we are not part of their group and never will be.

kind of a bad comparrison but you get what i am trying to say.

>>691858
>>the fact of the matter is that they weren't hurting anyone doing what they were doing
>>he only laws they broke was that nutjob koresh fucked some of the kids
>>fucked some kids
i didn't know catholic priests came to 4chan

>>692008
>So you're the reason I'll never get a government run brothel which also sells weed at fair prices. It would erase the national debt in a matter of months.

i'm glad that your degenerative ideas will never see the light of day or ever be taken seriously.

>"HURR, WEED , SHALLOW SEX AND DRUGS ARE COOL, LETS ALL DO THEM WITHOUT WORRYING ABOUT IT DEGRADING THE MORALS OF OUR COUNTRY"

go live in holland, they like folks like you.

>>692027

Tradition for the sake of tradition, huh?

>>692034
>lone psycho fucks some kids
>76 innocent people die

the whole situation was messed up. koresh was a fuckhead and the ATF screwed up bigtime. no one won, everyone lost.

>>692027

>i respect your opinion but i disagree with it. i believe that the traditional marriage between one man and one woman should be preserved.
So you're denying rights that you have to others.

>its a tradition, religious in nature that has remained unchanged for thousands of years.
You realize that back in the day, men had multiple wives, right? Marriage has, does, and will change, especially when it confers special government-recognized benefits.

>thats what a tradition is, it remains unchanged. marriage by definition is one man and one woman
No, in fact it is not.

>we have pregressed though to a certain extent and gays are allowed their own unity ('civil unions'). but marriage is for straight people. to demand a 'right' of a group which you dont belong to is kinda stupid.
"Seperate but equal"... Where have I heard that before?

>i always liken it to white people wanting to use the word nigger "baww why cant we use that .. blacks are allowed so why arent we?". the simple answer is that it is becasue we are not black. it is a black word traditionally used by blacks. to damnad that us white folk be able to use it is retarded becasue we are not part of their group and never will be. kind of a bad comparrison but you get what i am trying to say.
It's just a bad comparison.

OP, I drove by a care just like the one in your picture. Except it was plastered in pictures of babies and fetuses too.

>>692070
thats what tradition is. values passed down through generations. and its the main difference between libs and conservatives.

conservatives value where we have been and want to maintain and preserve that way of living for future generations.

liberals dont give a fuck about tradition or anything in the past and want to change everything to suit what they think the modern world should be like.

I'm still waiting for a "revolution" to happen so that we can kill all radical conservatives legally. Seriously, nothing has killed the republican party more than they have.

>>692027
i respect your opinion but i disagree with it. i believe that the traditional marriage between one white and another should be preserved. its a tradition, religious in nature that has remained unchanged for thousands of years. thats what a tradition is, it remains unchanged. marriage by definition is between two white people, we have pregressed though to a certain extent and blacks are allowed their own unity ('civil unions'). but marriage is for white people. to demand a 'right' of a group which you dont belong to is kinda stupid.

i always liken it to straight people wanting to use the word faggot "baww why cant we use that .. gays are allowed so why arent we?". the simple answer is that it is becasue we are not gay. it is a gay word traditionally used by gays. to damnad that us straight folk be able to use it is retarded becasue we are not part of their group and never will be.

kind of a bad comparrison but you get what i am trying to say.

>>691767
If you are a conservative, you are a
>bigoted
>religious
>racist
>corporatist/crypto-fascist
>patriarchal
>enemy of western civilization

There are no "reasonable" conservatives, only angry, psychotically selfish people who want to drag the world back into the middle ages.

>>692050
First of all, I've never smoked weed in my life and I'm also a virgin. I'm just thinking about things practically. People like pussy and weed, the government needs money, so the gov't should provide these things at a fair price. Oh and on the subject of gay marriage, I personally believe that marriage should not be recognized by the state or federal government. That way it becomes a purely religious thing and gay people can find a church that accepts their lifestyle choice.

>>692088
yeah those fuckers ruined slavery for EVERYONE.

>>692050
>i'm glad that your degenerative ideas will never see the light of day or ever be taken seriously.
Different anon here. Wishful thinking at its finest on your part.

>THE MORALS OF OUR COUNTRY
What morals, and why do they even matter? As long as people can still act like they're part of a community, that's all that matters to me. Why would the introduction of brothels and weed inhibit something like that?

no one idolizes hannity, faggot.

beck and ann coulter are fucking awesome though. youre retarded if you dont think so.

>>692112
we have a sense of community?

If conservatives were rational, they'd be liberals.

>>692103
marriage is a legal property merger more than it is a religious ritual. And if you did away with civil marriages, people would be forced to turn to religious institutions even if they oppose religion. Take me, for example, I'm not ever setting foot in a church, much less getting married in/by one.

>>692121
what's rational about liberalism? all their beliefs go completely against scientific facts.

>>692134
>politics
>good science

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>692134

>Implying religion, creationism, etc. have any basis in scientific fact

oh u.jpg

>>692091
liberals are scared of guns. it would be...

an army of skinny know it all college kids with faggy hair, old college professors on ego trips and butthurt battle axe moms like rosie o'donnell.

VS.

a bunch of fucking angry men, young and old, all armed to the teeth with military grade weaponry and millions of rounds off ammunition that they have been stockpiling all their adult lives. they want liberal blood so bad and they can taste it. no force on earth will stop them...

I WONDER WHO WOULD WIN??

More conservatives need to idolize cool conservatives like William Buckley, Barry Goldwater, or Milton Friedman.

>>692113

God fucking Jesus sucking cock I love you. You're funny.

>>692134
you mean against 19th century pseudo-science (racism), political propaganda (free market liberalism), superstition (religion), and soci- no, wait, the finer, polemical sciences are not even recognized by the right wing, so discerning the cause-effect relationships in modern society is left entirely to the left wing. Who woulda thunk.

>>692149
You best be betting on the side with the natural science professors and engineers, nigger.

Why are white people of below average intelligents compared to other races such as Asians? Why do proud African American males always end up raping/murdering white men? Why are whites so weak they cannot defined themselves?

>>692097
as opposed to polite tolerent liberals that never make any angry bigoted generalizations like yourself?

>>692128
that's nice. then it shouldn't be called marriage if it's just about property and a few other things. you could obtain the same benefits by allowing civil unions and let churches marry people.

>>692149

>implying that all conservatives are really that badass.

Too bad they need guns to show their strength eh?

>>692088

>conservatives value where we have been and want to maintain and preserve that way of living for future generations.

Even if that way of living is either absolutely shitty or could possibly be better, of course.

>>692121
>Implying feelings are Rational

>>692134

its retarded social conservatives like you that give conservatives a bad name.

You're by far one of the stupidest posters on this board, and its kind of sad that people like you are the ones that the far left use as examples of conservatives.

Seriously, stop posting, and go back to wetting your bed.

>>692112
>implying brothels and weed are moral things.

>>692149
>implying Liberals don't have an army of minorities at their disposal.

I'm terrified if Palin gets on the ballot. I'd be afraid the shit with Bush's elections would happen.

>>692149
You forget that mail-bomb terrorism is an invention of the left. If you were a right-wing manly man and would kick my ass on the street, I would mail a little package to your little daughter's kindergarten. I hate conservatives that much.

>>692181
Not at all what I was implying.

>>692121
if liberals were able to think logically without being blinded by their hippy agenda they would be conservative.

>>692113
my brother idolizes him, then agian my bro is a faggot

>>692181
>implying morals aren't just medieval superstition

>>692139
and the edgiest most childish trip award 2010 goes to .... ChristianityIsForFaggots !bdA0re3Ceg !!!!

take a bow sir.

>>692197
"Liberalism" isn't something frivolous. The marxist academics I know are serious people, not hippies at all. Just because the right is full of goons and farmers in suits doesn't mean the little gaggle of fascist proles known as the republican party is any more respectable.

>>692128
I suppose civil unions for all could work in place of marriage. People could still get married for religious reasons but all couple would have to get civil unions to be recognized by the government. That could work.

>>692170
we win. dont give a fuck if you think we are pussies.

>>692209

I just bust that shit out whenever AIG posts in a thread I'm frequenting.

You know, make it obvious where my allegiances lie.

>>692197
That's why Natural Science professors, Mathematicians, and Logicians are mostly liberal.

Oh wait.

>>692234
>talking to a conservative
>get points across with logic
pick one.

>>692234
I love how they always do that-

>hurrdurr all these fucking liberal/socialist professors

not seeming to realize that the two terms are
1) largely mutually exclusive,
an 2) how it reflects on intelligence vs their views

ironiesabitch.jpg

>>692234

Natural science professors, mathematicians, and logicians believe that evolution and climate change are lies? They believe that the almighty Lord created everything in the universe and the Bible is literally true?

Please qualify your statements. I don't believe scientists and mathematicians like the way conservatives are politicizing science. I would like to see a source for your outlandish claim.