With guns, we are 'citizens.'

Without them, we are 'subjects'.

During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!

If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.

The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.

SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY MALE OVER 18 A GUN!

SWITZERLAND'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS EVERY ADULT THEY ISSUE A RIFLE TO AS A MEMBER OF THE MILITIA. HITLER DIDN'T INVADE SWITZERLAND BECAUSE OF THIS. HE IS SUPPOSED TO HAVE SAID, " SWITZERLAND DOESN'T HAVE AN ARMY -- SWITZERLAND IS AN ARMY."

SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!

IT'S A NO BRAINER!

So I take it that outlawing guns instantaneously cause mass-genocide?

Cool no-sequiter, bro.

Fun fact, dear OP: Japan has gun control and is ok. Brazil has gun control (which doesn't work, since drug dealers are heavily armed in the slums) and there isn't a genocide happing there...

>>55001

No, the point is that, if you look in history, in many situations gun control was followed by corruptive and controlling governments as well as the citizens inability to defend themselves.

And on the other hand, history shows that the 2nd amendment and the easy acquisition of a weapon for a citizen has shown that those with weapons are better protected then those that don't, from any source; whether it be another citizen, another country or from their own government.

Not that I was expecting a retard to actually read and take a moment to think about it though.

So cool assumptions, bro.

>>55023
Japan still has a lot of violent crime.

In the UK, gun control was established, the last government was elected freely. Birds flew, grass grew, cows chewed that grass and colours hued. The laws of motion stayed in place, Elvis Presley was still a credit to the human race, Ann Coulter still had a scary face. And nothing of value was lost.

>>55023
japan is fucking nuts

I think the american people should control their guns better.

>fags taking a glance at a post and coming up with their own presumptuous comments on the topic

sure is 4chan in here.\

>>55033
And so does Brazil. But both countries aren't under a genocidal dictatorship.

i masturbate with my gun. If Obama takes it away..i dont even

>>55056
>implying a majority aren't caused by illegal firearms and not properly owned and registered firearms

sure is uninformative faggots

Yea, Americans.
I'm British, and since we had gun controls, a whole 0 people have been rounded up and exterminated.
Then again, the SU, Turkey, 1940s Germany, China, Guatemala, Cambodia and Uganda aren't as politically stable as us.
But don't worry, your argument is still totally valid...

Also have to remember, countries that have gun control still have deaths from guns.

Even if it is a small amount of deaths, they are still deaths

>>55023
>Brazil
>no genocide
Ha, you're one funny guy

people get shot by people

[spoiler]people with guns[/spoiler]

Does Mexico have gun control?

I mean, there have been 15,000 killed in the past 3 years, and that is only in the border towns

>>55397
Mexico is very strict when it comes to firearms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Mexico

Britain has always had gun control, when were we 'exterminated'?

>>55376
"Genocide" isn't the same thing as "High criminality levels"

And I just realized I've been trolled...

>>55385
And crossbows and dartguns and bows and . . .

Gun control is a retarded premise.

A criminal is almost guaranteed to be carrying an illegal gun as it is, and now we are going to take away guns from people that just want to protect themselves, go hunting, target shoot, etc.

A criminal is going to be a criminal whether or not the government likes it.

>>55397
Mexico doesn't have control over anything in that poor ass beaner country. Why do you think all the spics are bustin' down our door to get in. Fuck spic ass beaners

>>55526
>Britain has always had gun control, when were we 'exterminated'?
If the Romano-Britons had guns, they wouldn't have been wiped out by the Anglo-Saxons.

>>55526
Britain is in the process of being exterminated. Just wait until it's taken over by muslims

guns dont kill people, people with guns do. got that fags?

>>55023
Fun fact liberal tard. Canada has same gun laws as America and they are ok. It's a culture problem not a gun problem.

>>55550
uncultured hick

im in New Zealand, our cops dont have guns, neither do we, unless we're native and in a gang, i know we are tiny as a country but im lookin outside for this extermination round up and honest to god i dont see anything

We have no gun deaths in Australia.
I'd say we're better than your country regardless of our censorship.

You allow thousands of people to die each year just because you won't let go of your phallic looking guns.

>>54980
Would it be a bad thing if those fomenting rebellion against the United States government be rounded up and executed for treason?

>>55652
2nd Ausfag here: there was that Gangland War in Melbourne that had something like 20 or 30 people dead spread out over several years
In the USA a gangland war would kill that many people in how many days?

It doesn't matter if you have a gun or not. If the government wants to round you up and execute you, they're going to do it. And if you shoot back with your pea-shooter 9mm when they have AKs, they can justify the execution right then and there.

The Nazis liberalised gun ownership laws, except for Jews and Gypsies and Slavs and shit.

Also how well did Civil Rights Movement, Anti-War Movement and Black Panthers and so on defend themselves from proxy groups like the KKK and Minutemen and Secret Army Organization; State authorities; and Federal authorities, in particular the FBI's COINTELPRO initiative?
It was on a bogus weapons stockpile claim, supplied by an FBI informant, that the Chicago PD were able to raid Fred Hamptons apartment and assassinate him.

And if you thought COINTELPRO was bad, you should look up Woodrow Wilsons Red Scare.
Or the Union busting of the late 19th century, early 20th century and 1920s where attempts at armed defense were used as justification for strike breakers or Pinkertons or National Guardsmen (or Pinkertons dressed as National Guardsmen) to run wild.

>>55680
If your police were up to par as ours are, you wouldn't be having gangland wars, you idiot.

>>54980

GUN CONTROL IS THE NORM IN ALL COUNTRIES.

THAT IS RETARDED.

THE MASSACRES JUST COINCIDED WITH THE GUN LAWS.

AS THEY WERE ALL PERPETRATED BY AN ESTABLISHED GOVERNMENT OR MILITARY AND THEREFORE ONE THAT WOULD PROBABLY INVOKE BASIC LAWS SUCH AS GUN CONTROL

YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

GUN CONTROL IS THE NORM IN ALL COUNTRIES.

THAT IS RETARDED.

THE MASSACRES JUST COINCIDED WITH THE GUN LAWS.

AS THEY WERE ALL PERPETRATED BY AN ESTABLISHED GOVERNMENT OR MILITARY AND THEREFORE ONE THAT WOULD PROBABLY INVOKE BASIC LAWS SUCH AS GUN CONTROL

YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

GUN CONTROL IS THE NORM IN ALL COUNTRIES.

THAT IS RETARDED.

THE MASSACRES JUST COINCIDED WITH THE GUN LAWS.

AS THEY WERE ALL PERPETRATED BY AN ESTABLISHED GOVERNMENT OR MILITARY AND THEREFORE ONE THAT WOULD PROBABLY INVOKE BASIC LAWS SUCH AS GUN CONTROL

YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

GUN CONTROL IS THE NORM IN ALL COUNTRIES.

THAT IS RETARDED.

THE MASSACRES JUST COINCIDED WITH THE GUN LAWS.

AS THEY WERE ALL PERPETRATED BY AN ESTABLISHED GOVERNMENT OR MILITARY AND THEREFORE ONE THAT WOULD PROBABLY INVOKE BASIC LAWS SUCH AS GUN CONTROL

YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

>>55877
tl;dr

>>55877
Someones in the process of changing his/hers viewpoint.

Gun control is pretty strict here, but we don't have a massive amount of guncrime, OP.

>>55891
>Someone's

>>55891
lol