looks right

7/10 would rage again

Pretty accurate.

Looks about right. I wouldn't say Fox News was as bad as Nazi Germany though, maybe their ministry of propaganda.

When did Jesus advocate for any liberal policies?

>>533092

This is what "christians" who've never read their own bible actually believe.

HEALAN THE SICK, FEEDAN THE HUNGRY, CLOTHAN THE NAKED.

>>533101
I don't remember when Jesus petitioned the Romans to use tax money for these things.

Jesus was a complete socialist and loved wealth transference. "OH HEY GIVE ME YOUR FISH AND BREAD I HAVE TO SPREAD IT AROUND LOL"

>>533092

Stoning your children if they don't behave is very liberal right?

>>533101
Christians also do those things. The liberal position is that those activities should be performed by the government, not by charities. Jesus never said that.

>>533109
>implying Jesus ever told people to stone kids

>>533108
Actually, he created wealth. He was like a fuck awesome broker. I take your fish and your bread and make it in to hundreds.

I bet his commission was low, too.

>>533105

ENJOY BEING ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY ON EVERY ISSUE EVERY TIME AND GETTING REJECTED FROM THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. YOU BEST CHANGE YOUR LIFE AND MAKE UP FOR A LIFE NOT LEAD IN CHRIST'S EXAMPLE IF YOU WANT TO PROVE TO HIM THAT YOU'RE TRULY SORRY FOR THE ERROR OF YOU WAYS.

>>533125
Either way, he loved to hand out shit to the poor and useless. Sounds like a socialist to me.

>United Federation of Planets

I actually would not mind that, at all.

>>533105

Yeah Jesus took initiative on his own and did something unlike the liberals of today.

Why bother helping your neighbor when you can just beg the government for shitty entitlement programs?

>>533128

Wrong again. Many, many capitalist christians give stuff to the poor.

>>533110

Jesus never said WHO should do it, either. I think it's safe to say he'd be pleased as long as it was happening, and wouldn't give a damn about who's doing it.

>>533128
>Charity is socialism.
>socialism is when the state owns the means of production

In socialism there's no need for charity because the government is facilitating the distribution of wealth. I hope I just got trolled.

>>533140
>>533135
> many capitalist christians give stuff to the poor.
They shouldn't. Only socialists believe that poor people deserve anything more than suffering.

>>533136
Give to Caesar what is Caesars...

No, I think he would have preferred that the people retain the liberty to choose to be philanthropic.

>>533132
Fuck that, I want a despotic moon base country, ruled by a tyrannical robot Carl Sagan.

>>533146
Odd, then that when taxes go up charity goes down.

>>533147

That quote has jack to do with his "Give to the poor" mantra.

>>533146

>athiest socialist tries to tell me what capitalist christians believe

>>533153
Not really. Forced socialism is the same as volunteered socialism. Both are despicable. Fuck the poor.

>>533154
Yes, but it has everything to do with his opinion of the state, ie the government. So if he wanted the government to control feeding, clothing, and paying the poor then it would have been mentioned.

tl;dr - Jesus was not a socialist.

>>533167
He was an anarcho-communist.

>No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Money.
>Matthew 6:24

>Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."
>Matthew 19:21

>All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.
>Acts 2:44-45

Sure is not Socialism right there

I think this chart is pretty good

>>533146
>>533166
Why then will you go to the defense of the rich when they get a 0.0001% tax increase? What have the poor done to deserve your hatred? You think they like being poor or wanted to be?

>>533173
Anarcho-Communist here, thats not socialism.
Socialism is centered around the state.
ANARCHO IS NOT.

Enjoy purgatory at best, hell at most likely, faux-christians.

>>533175
If it were socialism, he would threaten to imprison them if they did not give up their possessions and give to the poor.

ITT: retard liberals who think Jesus was a political figure as opposed to a religious one

>>533184
if the poor werent utterly worthless they would be poor

>>533175
>implying giving your own things to the poor by yourself is the same as giving your own things to the state so that they can give it to whomever they choose.

sure is trolling in here

>>533184
Poor people are wasters and deserve everything they get. If they are don't want to be poor anymore, they can get out of it. My family did.

>>533190
>Implying going to hell is not worse than imprisonment.

>>533193
ITT people who think Jesus was actually real and not simply written into a book.
>No first hand accounts from anyone at the time
>No evidence at all except the bible
>Only "evidence" claimed by Christians is proven forgery

>>533206
>Implying everyone he spoke to believed he was credible.

>>533203
>Inherited the success of your family
Your argument is invalid, you stuck-up self-aggrandizing fuck.

>>533214
>implying that it matters for the purposes of the thread.

1/10, make your own thread, it'll work better there.

>>533214

Jesus was most certainly a historic person, beyond that is where it gets shady. There are about 5 academics who support the idea that Jesus never existed, and they're fucking kooky.

>>533237
>Jesus was most certainly a historic person
Proof please.

>>533226
>implying that disproves poor people don't have to be poor.

>>533105

pls l2bible if you want to be a biblebashing idiot

"[Jesus said] 'Show me the coin used for paying the tax.' They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, 'Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?' 'Caesar's,' they replied. Then he said to them, 'Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.'"

-Matthew 22:19-21

>>533239

>I post numerous contemporary sources
>You go to wikipedia and copy/paste the "controversy" section of Jesus
>everybody loses

I can't believe how many Americans can quote the bible or simply have access to quotes from the bible relevant to this situation. It really shows why your country is fucked up.

>>533248
>I post numerous contemporary sources
Notice how you didn't and never will - as no one at the time documented this so called "miracle worker"

>>533252
>says the european who's country is being taken over by muslims

>>533262
There's that lie again. Mudslimes are at best 2% in my country. How many mexicans and blacks do you have?

>>533252
And I'm slightly shocked at how europeans don't understand how to "google" something. I guess it just cultural differences. They'll catch up I'm sure.

>"[Slavery] was established by decree of Almighty God...it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelation...it has existed in all ages, has been found among the people of the highest civilization, and in nations of the highest proficiency in the arts." Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of America.

>>533275
>missing the point entirely
how expected, christfag.

>>533258

Gnostic texts, Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny, Dead Sea Scrolls, etc.

Believing Jesus the person never existed is on par with believing the earth is hollow.

>>533221
>Implying I implyed everything like that
What the fuck is your problem? You said if he was a socialist he's be threatening imprisonment for not helping the poor etc,
Instead he said '"If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."
If you help the poor, you get rewarded in heaven, the alternative can be assumed to be hell, which would be the religious equivalent of prison.

Why did I bother writing a response to such an obvious troll...

>>533275

Im european and I made that post >>533247

And yes I google'd it...

>>533291
The distinction, sir, is that one can choose not to believe Jesus and suffer no consequences. Indeed, when choosing between one's existing religion and one that is proposed by Jesus, there is no reasonable criterion on which to base a decision, so one may as well decide based on which religion demands that you give up your possessions. One can choose not to believe in the government and still be imprisoned. Indeed, if the government told me that I would go to hell if I broke the speed limit, and had no real means of enforcement, I do not think I would have any reason not to break the speed limit.