Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • New boards launched! Advice, Literature, News, International, Science & Math, 3DCG.


    File : 1264865489.jpg-(55 KB, 500x293, Bnp(1).jpg)
    55 KB BNP given last chance to make equality change to constitution Matthew Taylor, Guardian (London) !GOulhIXUSE 01/30/10(Sat)10:31 No.52722  
    http://nig.gr/0RS
    >The British National party was warned tonight that it had one last chance to scrap its constitution or face legal action under equality laws.

    >Its leader, Nick Griffin, was told at a Central London county court session that new rules must be agreed at an extraordinary general meeting to be held next month.

    >The judgment saw BNP officials forced to rush out letters to members to alert them to the proposed changes.

    >The Equality and Human Rights Commission, which challenged the whites-only membership criteria last year, said the changes proposed still fell foul of equality laws.

    >John Wadham of the EHRC said the amended version, which refers repeatedly to "indigenous British", displayed indirect discrimination as opposed to direct discrimination. "It is not that much of an improvement," he said.

    >Judge Paul Collins said: "I'm going to give the BNP an opportunity to have its EGM and take into account what has been said today and get it right. I do not think there will be another opportunity to get it right. This is it." He also ordered the BNP to pay the £12,500 in court costs relating to the adjourned session.

    >A BNP spokesman Simon Darby said the party would have to "emasculate its constitution and drop its policies and principles" to comply with the court's wishes. "This is a deadly serious attempt to put us out of business," said Darby.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:32 No.52725
    >indirect discrimination

    lol
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:37 No.52737
    Go to czech republic.
    Purchase guns.
    Drive back to UK.
    Kill untermensch.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:40 No.52748
    >displayed indirect discrimination as opposed to direct discrimination

    Translation: We're going to shut you down and there's nothing you can do about it.

    God damnit why are the Brits acting like such a bunch of commies?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:45 No.52753
    They'll suppress the discontent that fuels the BNP at their own risk.
    >> The BNP is anti-democratic Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:54 No.52775
    BAN THEM
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:55 No.52777
    Fuck The BNP.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:55 No.52778
    lol angry white men
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:57 No.52780
         File1264867036.jpg-(11 KB, 220x241, 220px-BNP_Union_Jack_Logo.jpg)
    11 KB
    Basically the court said the BNP were not allowed to say in their constitution that they want to keep Britain ethnically British, because it offends minorities. Madness.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:57 No.52781
    When you have extremist muslim groups on top of political correctness gone mad, I can understand why parties like this would form. It's a backlash to you Britfags allowing letting in so many immigrants who don't assimilate and use freedom of speech laws to preach hate.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:59 No.52786
    soup /stormfront/ hows things?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:59 No.52789
    Even if the ban is successful they can just pick another name and start over, another one will rise and the people supporting them will become more and more pissed the more you ban, you can keep on banning but eventually it will lead to civil war if this keeps up.
    >> http://bnp.org.uk/policies/democracy/ Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)10:59 No.52790
         File1264867188.jpg-(105 KB, 590x372, scales.jpg)
    105 KB
    The British National Party is proud to be in possession of some of the most modern and progressive concepts of democracy which are firmly at odds with the other parties’ increasing totalitarianism.

    The British people invented modern Parliamentary democracy. Yet in recent years the British people have been denied their democratic rights. On issue after issue, the views of the majority of British people have been ignored and overridden by a politically correct elite which thinks it knows best.

    On immigration, on capital punishment, on the surrender of British sovereignty to the EU and in numerous other areas, democracy has been absent as Labour, Tories and Lib-Dems conspire in election after election to offer the British people no real choice on such vital issues.

    The BNP exists to give the British people that choice, and thus to restore and defend the basic democratic rights we have all been denied. We favour more democracy, not less, at national, regional and local levels.

    Power should be devolved to the lowest level possible so that local communities can make decisions which affect them.

    We will remove legal curbs on freedom of speech imposed by successive Governments over the last 40 years.

    We will implement a Bill of Rights guaranteeing fundamental freedoms to the British people.

    We will ensure that ordinary British people have real democratic power over their own lives and that Government, local and national, is truly accountable to the people who elect it.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:00 No.52792
         File1264867242.jpg-(7 KB, 135x217, 1_fullsize.jpg)
    7 KB
    If the BNP get banned, Britain is well and truly fucked.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:01 No.52796
    >>52786

    Stormfront is proscribed by the BNP you clueless retard. People get kicked from the party if they have links to it.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:02 No.52802
    >>52792
    No, we'll just ask Russia to clean out Europe from our unwanted. They will happily accept to kill some muslims.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:03 No.52803
    Sure is /stormfront/ in here.
    >> TYPICAL LIBERAL 01/30/10(Sat)11:03 No.52804
         File1264867438.jpg-(13 KB, 226x282, bnphammer.jpg)
    13 KB
    >"BNP ARE ANTI-DEMOCRACY!"

    >"LETS BAN DEMOCRATIC CHOICE, BAN FREE SPEECH, AND BAN FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION TO STOP THEM FROM HATING DEMOCRACY!"

    >"BASH THEM IN THE FACE WITH HAMMERS FOR DARING TO TRY AND PEACFULLY ORGANIZE DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION TO OUR TOTALITARIAN POLICIES!"
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:05 No.52807
    According to the Equality and Human Rights Commission, there is a limited range of acceptable positions a political party may advocate, and if a party falls outside that range they should either be coerced into changing their positions or be banned.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:07 No.52816
    >>52807
    imokwiththis.jpg
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:07 No.52817
         File1264867667.jpg-(26 KB, 616x421, Trevor_Phillips_114905s.jpg)
    26 KB
    >>52807

    Wanting to preserve the British identity, that has existed in this country for thousands of years, is unacceptable to the Equalities commission and their African chairman.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:07 No.52818
    Whats going on? Whats the BNP?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:09 No.52825
    >>52816
    >imokwiththis.jpg

    Yes, we know you are. Leftists are the most totalitarian statist group of people on the planet.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:09 No.52827
    You got to realize when organizations like Unite Against Fascism use the term "democratic", they are using it in a similar manner to The "Democratic" People's Republic of Korea uses it.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:09 No.52829
    >>52818

    BNP - Nationalist political party in Britain opposed to the EU, mass-immigration, multicultralism, political correctness and loss of British identity.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:12 No.52836
    >>52818
    The British National Party AKA The British Nazi Party.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:13 No.52838
    >>52829
    sounds good, where do i sign up?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:13 No.52839
         File1264868008.jpg-(105 KB, 504x468, school-cartoon1.jpg)
    105 KB
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:14 No.52843
    >>52804
    >Implying the BNP wouldn't ban democratic choice, free speech, freedom of association, freedom of religion, freedom of press, and others to fulfill their nationalist agenda.
    lol.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:14 No.52844
    If the exclusion of membership based on ethnicity is accepted, exclusion based on gender should is just as justifiable. The Christian SGP party in the Netherlands excluded women from membership till 2006. Now they're allowed membership but still cannot represent the party in any political way (parlement etc.).
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:16 No.52851
    >>52836

    UAF steal a BNP holocaust rememberance wreath.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:17 No.52853
    >>52851

    http://www.pendletoday.co.uk/nelsonnews/Police-probe-as-antifascism-group.6027093.jp
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:17 No.52854
    BNP are a joke of a party, reading their polices saddens me.

    The last political party that had a stand for a ethenical group was the nazis, sadly Nick Griffin looks like a overcooked sausage roll rather than a dictator.

    They won't get in power, and britain will be better in the years to come.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:18 No.52856
    >>52843
    See: >>52790

    >Power should be devolved to the lowest level possible so that local communities can make decisions which affect them.

    >We will remove legal curbs on freedom of speech imposed by successive Governments over the last 40 years.

    >We will implement a Bill of Rights guaranteeing fundamental freedoms to the British people.

    >We will ensure that ordinary British people have real democratic power over their own lives and that Government, local and national, is truly accountable to the people who elect it.

    The accusations that secretly they are Statists like the mainstream parties are ridiculous. The current parties in power are busy doing horrendously totalitarian things and the reason the BNP is so hated is because they /oppose/ this increasing totalitarianism.

    Anyone who truly desired to ban things like free speech would just join the parties who are already doing it instead of sacrificing themselves and putting their own lives at risk to defend free speech and democracy under the BNP banner.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:20 No.52859
    >>52851
    >>52853

    LOL, how petty can you get?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:21 No.52863
    i think they are going to get alot more votes but its not like they are going to ever win
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:21 No.52864
    >>52856
    >Doesn't know anything about the far right
    LOL. Mussolini said the same things too. Go look at the Social Republic of Italy to see how the far right really works in action.
    >> TYPICAL LIBERAL 01/30/10(Sat)11:22 No.52866
    >"THE BNP COULD MAYBE POSSIBLY BE SECRETLY TRYING TO BE ANTI-DEMOCRATIC DESPITE THAT BEING COMPLETELY CONTRARY TO ALL THEIR VIEWS AND POLICIES"

    >"VOTE FOR THE PARTIES WHICH ARE OPENLY ANTI-DEMOCRATIC AND ARE CURRENTLY BANNING DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS LIKE FREE ASSOCIATION AND FREE SPEECH"

    >"TO STOP THE BNP FROM CARRYING OUT THEIR EVIL POLICIES OF IMPLEMENTING A BILL OF RIGHTS AND MAKING SURE THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE"
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:22 No.52868
    >>52856

    Bullshit, you must be a total fucking idiot for believing in that... BNP will move to get rid of all the 2nd generation immagrints out this country, and thats all they will do. The rest of this great nation will crumble.
    Why do I say this? It's because the BNP couldn't even keep their member list safe, they are incontinent racist bastards. And they feed of the Middle white class daily mail reading cunts who are too fucking lazy to see immagration isn't such a problem.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:24 No.52871
    >>52856
    >The accusations that secretly they are Statists like the mainstream parties are ridiculous.

    They are openly statist. Their policies are socialist.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:24 No.52872
    post BNP thread receive over 9000 replies
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:25 No.52875
    >>52871
    No, their policies are more fascist than socialist. They're fascist because they would only, ideally, effect the British. The BNP would vomit at the thought of giving any government aide to an immigrant, assimilated or not.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:26 No.52877
    >>52868
    Immigration is a pretty massive burden. It causes a lot of crime and is a drain on taxpayers.

    It also makes it very easy for the government to do totalitarian things like banning certain views. And it makes it harder to get rid of them due to corruption because they have bought voters by letting them into the country and giving them welfare and special privileges over the native british.

    Basically what the current political parties want is a South African type political climate where no matter how openly corrupt and incompetent the ruling parties are they are never voted out.

    BNP wants to stop that. They are the only party which is sticking their necks out in an attempt to stop the government from having too much control over the people.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:26 No.52878
    >BNP
    >competent
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:26 No.52879
    >>52868

    Why shouldn't anyone believe it? It's their official policy you fucking moron. Policy can't be changed unless supported by the majoirty of the party.

    Their membership was leaked by a fired official who had access to it. There was nothing the party could do about it.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:27 No.52881
    Freedom of speech says what
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:27 No.52882
    >>52875

    wat.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:28 No.52884
    >>52875

    >We want Britain to remain – or return to – the way it has traditionally been. We accept that Britain always will have ethnic minorities and have no problem with this as long as they remain minorities and do not change nor seek to change the fundamental culture and identity of the indigenous peoples of the British Isles.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:28 No.52885
    >>52871
    Everything says that they are anti-statists who want the government to have less control.

    Do you have a source on your claims?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:29 No.52888
    >>52877
    Immigration is more helpful than anything. It adds genetic diversity to an island who is the butt of dozens of inbreeding jokes all around the world. It also gives British factory owners a cheap source of labor, and adds culturally to the country.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:30 No.52889
    >>52875
    >No, their policies are more fascist than socialist. They're fascist because they would only, ideally, effect the British.

    Even if that were true, it is irrelevant.

    http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=socialism
    >(n) socialism (a political theory advocating state ownership of industry)
    >(n) socialism, socialist economy (an economic system based on state ownership of capital)

    The BNP supports state ownership of industry, therefore they are socialist.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:30 No.52891
    Too all the lazy morons who don't even know the BNP's immgration policy:

    >- Deport all the two million plus who are here illegally;

    - Deport all those who commit crimes and whose original nationality was not British;

    - Review all recent grants of residence or citizenship to ensure they are still appropriate;

    - Offer generous grants to those of foreign descent resident here who wish to leave permanently;

    - Stop all new immigration except for exceptional cases;

    - Reject all asylum seekers who passed safe countries on their way to Britain.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:31 No.52892
    >>52884
    >the fundamental culture and identity of the indigenous peoples of the British Isles.
    Do they define what this means?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:32 No.52896
    >>52885
    >Everything says that they are anti-statists who want the government to have less control.

    >Do you have a source on your claims?

    The BNP on health-care:

    http://bnp.org.uk/policies/health/
    >“Marketisation,” and particularly the Conservative-created Private Finance Initiative (PFI) schemes imposed by Gordon Brown, has been a disaster which is saddling Trusts and the taxpayer with enormous debts. We totally reject this attempt to turn the nation’s health service into a private profit centre for giant corporations.

    >The British National Party has the only plan by which our NHS can be nursed back to health.

    >The BNP is wholly committed to a free, fully funded National Health Service for all British citizens.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:32 No.52897
    >>52889
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
    >In the economic sphere, many fascist leaders have claimed to support a "Third Way" in economic policy, which they believed superior to both the rampant individualism of unrestrained capitalism and the severe control of state socialism. This was to be achieved by establishing significant government control over business and labour (Italian fascist leader Mussolini called his nation's system "the corporate state"). No common and concise definition exists for fascism and historians and political scientists disagree on what should be in any such definition.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:33 No.52898
    >>52892
    WEEEEHEEEEYYYY GONNA GET DRUNK DEN KILL ZUM PAKIZ INNIT BLOOD
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:34 No.52904
    >>52888
    Wow with all the downsides who could argue with how great it is simply because it stops leftists from making fun of Britain (although not really, they will still make fun of British people in Britain even when they are a tiny minority) and gives wealthy capitalists a source of cheap labour to undercut the native people. Great!

    Who needs things like lower taxes and democratic rights like free speech and freedom of organization when there are great alternatives to those such as helping the wealthy get wealthier at our expense!
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:35 No.52906
    >>52897

    A supposed "Third Way" is advocated by many groups with many differing political views. Centrists are also fond of the term.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:35 No.52907
    >>52888

    We don't want genetic diversity in a country that has remained mostly ethnically British for over a thousand years. I like to know I share the same heritage with my neighbours.

    Multicultralism is wrong on so many levels. British culture can't thrive in an enviroment filled with alien cultures, religions, people and beliefs.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:37 No.52910
    ITT a bunch of british stormfronters mad.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:37 No.52914
    Fascism is one of the worst political terms to employ in debate. There is no clear definition on what a fascist is. Nevertheless, there is a widespread attitude of "I know a fascist when I see it" even if everybody's conception of one is different.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:37 No.52916
    >>52906

    Tony Blaire was an advocate of Third Way policies.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:38 No.52917
    >>52896
    So instead of the government funnelling money into the pockets of their friends they want it to be spent for the benefit of the British people. What is Statist about that?

    It's like you would accuse them of being statists if they advocated the government providing and maintaining roads as well.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:38 No.52918
    >>52892

    >We use the term indigenous to describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the historic migrations from mainland Europe.

    The migrations of the Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norse and closely related kindred peoples have been, over the past few thousands years, instrumental in defining the character of our family of nations.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:40 No.52925
    http://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/As_I_Please/english/efasc
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:41 No.52930
    NEARY EVERY COUNTRY DEPORTS ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
    >> Incredibly Unpleasant: Communist ☭ Revolutionary !!5rWCl5wkOgp 01/30/10(Sat)11:42 No.52933
    >>52930
    Except America. Both parties would never go for stricter immigration policies, because the constituency on both sides benefits.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:43 No.52934
    >Britain is full up
    >full up
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:43 No.52936
         File1264869797.png-(38 KB, 200x181, Enoch Powell Flag.png)
    38 KB
    Enoch Powell was right.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:44 No.52938
         File1264869842.gif-(5 KB, 1800x1000, Ancapflag.gif)
    5 KB
    >>52917
    >So instead of the government funnelling money into the pockets of their friends they want it to be spent for the benefit of the British people. What is Statist about that?

    The fact that the state is funneling money at all is indicative of statism.

    >It's like you would accuse them of being statists if they advocated the government providing and maintaining roads as well.

    Yes, that would be statist.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:45 No.52940
    >>52910

    plenty of freedom hating leftards here as well
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:46 No.52941
    >>52933

    What the hell are you talking about? The USA routinely deports illegal immigrants. I'm talking hundreds of thousands every year.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:46 No.52943
    >>52910

    a good example of why so many chavs (aka wiggers) exist... what do you choose? White 'identity' aka no identity or 'sup innit blud badmans juck dem grebos innit'
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:46 No.52944
         File1264870006.jpg-(15 KB, 203x320, Pat_Richardson_Epping.jpg)
    15 KB
    >>52910

    All the stormfronters that supported the BNP left after the BNP got their Jewish candidate elected.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:47 No.52946
    >>52918
    I meant this part:

    >the fundamental culture and identity
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:48 No.52948
    Britain is full up yet your policies imply preferential treatment for indiginous Brits. Make up your mind, what is your primary goal BNP?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:48 No.52949
    >>52944
    rather a jew than a muslim extremist
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:51 No.52962
         File1264870303.jpg-(71 KB, 1067x800, fictie.jpg)
    71 KB
    Can someone explain to me how this immigration mess started in the UK. If it's anything like the situation that happened in America then you guys probably deserved it. Here's how I see America.

    >Whites (who definitely weren't racist) stole the land from the native Americans and almost exterminated their race by accident.
    >The same white went and purchased millions of slaves from Africa.
    >They treated said slaves like shit for a few decades.
    >They then gave the descendants of said slaves equal rights and were surprised when the Africans still held some hatred for the whites that enslaved their ancestors.
    >The privileged whites of the south (who's ancestors most likely owned a slave) are angry about the blacks who have been misbehaving for 5 decades despite the fact that they went through 2 centuries of slavery, segregation, discrimination, colonization, and oppression.

    Whites are without a doubt the most creative race on the planet but you guys were horrible adventurers. You didn't 'discover' America, Australia, Hawaii, or New Guinea. You stole those lands from the natives. Seriously, if you colonize half of the planet did you think there wouldn't be some conflicts between you and the hordes of homeless natives. And now I assume the Arabs are doing the same to your land (that your race did to countless ethnic groups). What's the matter, you can dish it but you cant take it? Typical bully mentality.
    >> Incredibly Unpleasant: Communist ☭ Revolutionary !!5rWCl5wkOgp 01/30/10(Sat)11:52 No.52965
    >>52941
    Yeah, but they just come back. I mean, a vast majority of the illegals are from Mexico, so it's easy for them to just illegally cross again. There's no punishment besides getting deported.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:55 No.52972
    >>52965
    but the u.s is still deporting them instead of welcoming them with open arms like in the u.k
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)11:56 No.52976
    >>52972

    Great Britain is well and truly screwed if the BNP is made illegal by the government.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:02 No.53000
    >>52972

    They clearly aren't deporting enough of them, because there are somewhere between 10-20 million illegal immigrants residing within the United States.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:03 No.53010
    >>52962
    >What's the matter, you can dish it but you cant take it? Typical bully mentality.

    It's not the same thing at all. We took America, Africa and Asia by force. Immigrants are taking our countries because our elites let them...
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:07 No.53026
    >>52863
    Neither did hitler.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:11 No.53049
    >>52965
    Not just mexicans, all sorts of illegals come through the mexican border.
    The mexican government ships criminals into the USA so they don't have to imprison them.

    >>52962
    >You stole those lands from the natives
    Guess what you dumb commie, all lands everywhere had people already living on them. You can make the same claim of any people in the world.

    The natives were dumb violent pagan savages, we took the land and have built a nation out of it.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:13 No.53060
    The British Extreme Right. Always good for a laugh.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:13 No.53061
    >>52962
    >implying we're not trying to protect what's ours, which your ancestors apparently failed to do
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:15 No.53069
    the western world has been gripped by extremist leftism for far too long... the right will rise eventually
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:16 No.53077
    >>53010
    >It's not the same thing at all. We took America, Africa and Asia by force. Immigrants are taking our countries because our elites let them...
    Excuse them for not being barbarians. This subtle method of Nation stealing is quite commendable (not that I want the UK to be infested with immigrants). This is kinda like how Egypt died.

    To be honest with you, if whites took over the brownies' lands with this subtle method I wouldn't be offended by it. The Arabs are basically giving you an option and your race is accepting said options. When the majority of your race is for something then who are you to say it's wrong? If your stance was in the majority I'm pretty sure the BNP would have been controlling the UK by now.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:23 No.53127
    >>53077
    >When the majority of your race is for something then who are you to say it's wrong?

    Success is the sole earthly judge of right and wrong. Obviously, this tolerant, liberal, multicultural system is not working, and it has to be destroyed once and for all.

    >If your stance was in the majority I'm pretty sure the BNP would have been controlling the UK by now.

    Most people are very ignorant and/or don't care about politic and their nation.
    >> Incredibly Unpleasant: Communist ☭ Revolutionary !!5rWCl5wkOgp 01/30/10(Sat)12:29 No.53147
    >>53049
    >The mexican government ships criminals into the USA so they don't have to imprison them.
    That sounds a little fishy. Source?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:32 No.53164
    >>53127
    >Most people are very ignorant and/or don't care about politic and their nation.
    Reading some stormfront articles makes it sound like a genocide. So you're telling me whites of Brittan are indifferent to the genocide of their own race? (And are you also telling me said people are in the majority.) I think this is more of a constitution error than it is about race. Even if you get rid of the immigrants the people of UK will still have quarrels with the UK's (questionable) laws. America was created in direct response to England's laughable government. This is just another blame game.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:38 No.53185
    >>53164
    >So you're telling me whites of Brittan are indifferent to the genocide of their own race?
    Quite correct.
    For the most part people rely on the jew international media for their information.

    And it pushes a hard left agenda.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)12:38 No.53188
    >>53164
    >So you're telling me whites of Brittan are indifferent to the genocide of their own race?

    Yes. Everywhere I hear "so what if they replace us? They are human beings just like us, and anyway we won't be alive anymore when it happens, so why should we care?" Typical selfish individualistic mentality. Disgusting.

    >Even if you get rid of the immigrants the people of UK will still have quarrels with the UK's (questionable) laws. America was created in direct response to England's laughable government.

    So? There will still be problems, but at least we will still exist.
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)13:03 No.53306
    >>53188
    >Yes. Everywhere I hear "so what if they replace us? They are human beings just like us, and anyway we won't be alive anymore when it happens, so why should we care?" Typical selfish individualistic mentality. Disgusting.
    No offense but you've colonized half of the globe and have spread your seed to every continent on the Earth. In the last century alone your race has done more to exterminate thousands of ethnic groups than all of the other races combined and multiplied by 10. I find your subtle use of the word 'extinction' disturbing. White Nationalism you say? Well if you guys were more like the Asians and stayed to your own continent then there wouldn't be a need for White Nationalism.

    Fun fact: Even if we started killing a 5 million whites a day it would take centuries for your race to become extinct (assuming only a minority of your race mixes with other races). To reiterate, unless we some how manage to pull a Hitler on you, your race can not become extinct through immigration. The only thing that can kill a race nowadays is race mixing. Spoilers: you are not the representative of the white race. If they decide to mix with others then it's their own fault. And besides, niggers, sand niggers, Mexicans and Jews are so ugly remember? What do you have to worry about?
    >> Anonymous 01/30/10(Sat)13:10 No.53330
         File1264875052.jpg-(40 KB, 440x298, bnp_1413178a.jpg)
    40 KB
    >>52775

    Freedom of speech!



    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]AnonymousLynn Geter Forc...
    [V][X]Matthew Ta...!GOulhIXUSEBNP given last ...