Why not? 80's where awesome

Dude's rocking an UrQuattro, if I were a brit he'd have my vote.

Can one of you UK fags help me out, is Labor the right or the left? I get confused because conservative doesn't mean th esame thing over there either.

>>520461
labour are left wing, they are the cancer killing Britain

>>520461
Left wing bro

>>520478
Nope,
The huge influx of sand/niggers and niggers are the Cancer killing Britain.

I'm voting for the BNP this term

C'mon Cameron - fire up the Quattro

>>520488
which was caused by labour, they are the cancer

>>520461

Labour = centre left

Conservative = centre right

But on a European scale

Democrat = Right

Republican = FAR Right

oh jesus

I always laugh when I read about how much the English hate the 1980's.

Meanwhile in America the 1980's were pretty fucking awesome.

>>520564
the 1980s only sucked in britain if you were useless welfare level scum, for everyone else it was great

Yeah, we'll just let Labour take Britain back to the 70s, but with more Muslims

i have absolutely no idea why britain wants to continue moving to the left

i dont have a problem with brown people or people of different religion, but you really need to tighten up your immigration laws, people that move in and leech off the system are strangling your nation

and i have no idea why you want an ever increasing police presence

>>520626
im not trolling i just want to hear a counter argument, ive never been to britain, it just seems insane to me

"Thatcher’s Britain" [...] the same journal reported that "up to 2 million British children are suffering ill-health and stunted growth because of malnutrition" as a result of "poverty on a scale not seen since the 1930s." The trend to increasing child health has reversed and childhood diseases that had been controlled are now on the upswing thanks to the (highly selective) "free market gospel" that is much admired by the beneficiaries.

A few months earlier, a lead headline reported "One in three British babies born in poverty," as "child poverty has increased as much as three-fold since Margaret Thatcher was elected." "Dickensian diseases return to haunt today’s Britain," another headline reads, reporting studies concluding that "social conditions in Britain are returning to those of a century ago." Particularly grim are the effects of cutting off gas, electricity, water, and telephones to "a high number of households" as privatization takes its natural course, with a variety of devices that favor "more affluent customers" and amount to a "surcharge on the poor," leading to a "growing gulf in energy between rich and poor," also in water supply and other services. The "savage cuts" in social programs are placing the nation "in the grip of panic about imminent social collapse." But industry and finance are benefiting very nicely from the same policy choices. To top it all off, public spending after 17 years of Thatcherite gospel was the same 42 1/4 percent of GDP that it was when she took over.

>>520636
Britfag here,

And I'm asking the same questions.

We just don't know why there is need of so much security, via CCTV's etc

>>520641
the poor wouldnt be poor if they werent worthless, they get what they deserve

Amerifag here

So the Conservatives have gone the same way in policy on the NHS in the same way Republicans here have gone on Medicare?

>>520654
isnt the labour party the kinda leftish party the most popular party though?

even when everything goes down the shitter people don't rush to support the Tories because too many remember this>>520641

>>520671
Well, it used to be, but now, most major newspapers are switching sides from Labour to Conservative support.

The polls also show that Conservatives are ahead in surveys done for the public etc

>>520679
well your left wing parties suck and your right wing parties suck so i guess you're just fucked?

>>520671
not after the shit theyve pulled while in charge

>>520662
>worthless
>subjective value

Oh you.

>>520687
>implying worth is subjective

>>520684
There's some hope that the third party will have a say in things, namely it's "shadow finance guy", who's immensely popular and talks sense, may become the actual "finance guy" in a coalition government.
So it's still better than the US.

Labor are fucking commie scum.

>>520743
Ah yes, I remember now that communists are fervent supporters of third way economics!

>>520704
>Implying it isn't

>>520766
The Liberal Democrats are, for all intents and purposes, purely centrist. I have to, however, make a correction of >>520507 's post; Labour is centre-right, and has been since it was overrun by Third Way numpties in the late '80s.

>>520757
>third way
enjoy your delusions commie enabler.

>>520782
If Labour really wanted to usher in a communist regime I doubt they would spend over a decade deregulating the financial sector. You see, communism tends not to view liberal economics as a viable tool for establishing a communist society.

>>520766

Centrist. They were started by an alliance between the Social Democratic party (left-wing) and the Liberal party (right-wing), so they sort of cancelled out.

>>520794
They sound like a better choice than labor or tories.

ITT: fucking morons who know bugger all about British politics and are still under the delusion that Labour are a left wing party......the BNP are more left than labour FFS.

>>520812
hehe you said bugger

the 80s sucked you brainwashed conservtards.

Vote Lib-Dem


Also, all politics are stuck in the 80s because the left decided it really just wants to be the right without christfaggotry.

>>520488
You don't need to say "sand/niggers" and "niggers".

Any Brit with a brain will not vote BNP or conservatives; Especially the BNP which will fuck your poor arse till you bleed. Not even mentioning the positive affects immigration has had on England since pre-history ffs.

>>520793
I would agree, Labour is trying even harder to appease the big bankers than the Tories do.

>>520828
for you pathetic peasants it did, meanwhile the people who actually matter were having the time of our lives as we deserve to. We let you live, be happy for that.

>>520493
Quite appropriate having him sat on the bonnet of an old car, considering the Tories are going to bring back the rolling tax-exemption for old motors (that Labour stopped). Fuckin' A.

>>520851
You're not even trying, you miserable troll.

>>520800

They are. And loads of people agree, but half of them won't vote Lib-Dem because they see it as a "wasted vote". Goddamnit.

>>520884
Plus, it doesn't help that, even if they get a third of the vote, the Lib-Dems won't receive a third of the seats in parliament.

>>520884
>>520905
You guys need Instant Runoff Voting even more badly than America does.

Labour: Centre right
Conservative: Slighty more right but still near the centre
Lib Dems: Centre
Green Party: Liberal Left (pot smoking hippies)
UKIP: Right (Social capitalists)
BNP: Authoritarian Left (socialism...but only for whites)

>>520914

MRLP: Cuthbert

>>520914
>BNP: Authoritarian Left (socialism...but only for whites)

So they're basically Nazis

>>520914
do you have good polling data before the elections about the actual chances of individual candidates in particular districts/constituencies ?

for instance, do people know what are the approximate chances of a LibDem winning the seat and if it makes sense to vote LibDem at all?

fuck yeah green party

>>520944

You have all the results from previous elections, but thats about it.

>>520914
>Conservative: Slighty more right but still near the centre

wow, they actually convinced the people that they are only "slightly more right"
That's a great propaganda achievement man, get back to me when they will have been in power for a year or so, with how they are only "slightly more right"!

>>520963
that's pretty bad! pollsters don't have enough money or what?

>>520942

NAZI's, Stalinists maybe somewhere around that region I would say, especially with all the BS about bringing power back to the people, nationalisation, protectionism and 'returning to the land' that they have been spouting.

>>520967

Lol, Labour fag detected.

>>520967

Are you Implying Maggie Thatcher was bad...because New Labour seem to worship her.

Will be voting BNP.

>>521005
Implying??>>520641

>>520998
I'm actually a Vince Cable fan.

Labour are indecisive bumbling buffoons.
Conservative are stuck up indecisive bumbling buffoons.
Lib Dems dont even care.
BNP have absolutely no policies other than "Pakis out"
The DUP are bible bashers who are also closet gays and corrupt as fuck
The UUP are totally incompetent.
The SDLP are lamer then even the Lib Dems.
Sinn Fein have sold out.

I literally dont know who to vote for, the Greens will probably get my vote

>>520944

http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/

Have a look at that.

>BNP have absolutely no policies other than "Pakis out"

http://bnp.org.uk/policies/

>>521006
They would bury uk into the ground and cause massive hate crimes.

>>521006

I hope you would enjoy your tanked economy in your communist shithole if they ever won.

>>521030
How would they do that, Mr Bullshitter?

I thought Third Way politics you jokers have been talking about was referencing the third sector of the economy ala jeremy rifkin ideas.

But instead it's a truly retarded melding of left and right. So labour really has gone to complete shit.

>>521036

Mass nationalisation, protectionsim stalling trade, alienation from the international community, mass riots as a BNP govt would not be widely supported (minorties would go fucking nuts), lack of any kind of real governmental experience etc etc etc etc

>They would bury uk into the ground and cause massive hate crimes

Implying Labour hasn't already dragged the UK into the ground and given the Brits reason to cause hate crimes?

Yorkshirefag here also voting BNP. Shit worked last time in the Euro's. Hopefully get an MP in the generals.

BNP get

>>521078
Well done, Yorksire & Humberside.

FUCK YEAR BNP

>>521070
>Implying the US cares as long as the UK continues to be our butt buddies.

>>521024

thanks, i needed a good laugh

>The British people invented modern Parliamentary democracy

>We support the re-introduction of corporal punishment for petty criminals

>unemployment in this country will be brought to an end
mmkay....

>We are against the ‘trendy’ teaching methods

>the IRA could have been destroyed years ago
hmmm

my favourite:
>We would end all attempts to force the people of Northern Ireland to accept foreign interference in their affairs
......wouldnt you be interfering with us then, Nick?

>>521078

oooooooo you got 2 whole MEP's my god....holy christ the BNP are storming the elections....they will win everything......

>Implying the BNP arent seen as a joke even by many in the right wing community.

>>521109
Sounds pretty good to me. You just hate it because your a clueless liberal pussy.

BNP voters, you do know Clegg is accepting his European Union salary at the minute

>>521112

>implying we give a fuck what the right wing community think because they are all controlled by ZOG

>>521109
>unemployment in this country will be brought to an end

>>521107

What the fuck does the US have to do with anything?

>mass riots as a BNP govt would not be widely supported

Implying the BNP wouldn't need mass support to form a government?

>>521132

Stalin wearing his trollface

>>521124

Its worth you lot all voting BNP, so Nick Griffin could (lol) become Prime Minister, so I and the rest of the world may be able to watch the complete collapse of a first world country

We have our Geert Wilders party: BNP!

>>521152
Griffin is stepping down as leader soon, I doubt he'd be around to see a BNP government.

>>521140
there was no unemployment because the state provided jobs for everybody, and the unemployed who rejected them went to prison in the the USSR.

So is the BNP cool with whites immigrating?

>>521024

>Let's get out of Europe because... uh... dirty frogs and huns are telling us what to do!
>Lets fuckin kill pedos and murderers and terrorists and beat criminals up! Fuck year
>It's not as if globalisation is a good thing! Let's protect shitty British industries at the cost of efficiency. Because they took owr jerbs!
>Teaching was much better in my day. Let's start hitting children again and telling them it's alright to hate gays.
>Some more stuff about the evils of trading with other nations or something
>Some completely unaffordable green policies so we don't look entirely monstrous
>No more helping dirty foreigners!
>Dirty asylum seekers! Let's stop helping out other people and spend more money on pensioners, because, other than the poor and uneducated, they're the only ones who vote for us!
>Let's stop the policies that ended the Troubles and reconquer Ireland or something
>No cuts to the Armed Services, and pulling all our soldiers back to Britain. So they can sit about and, uh, train I guess. In readiness for invasion by the French and Germans or something. And bring back national service. Because that's how it was in my day.
>Reform democracy, because that's the only way we'll get any power!

What a nice bunch.

>>521136

You really know fuck all about UK politics do you you completely inbred mongoloid shithead.

Average election turnout :

around 60%

% of the vote to get a majority in Parliament generally:

about 38%

>>521112
"Better than nowt" as we say here in God's own county. Pic related.

>>521180
Implying the BNP wouldn't love to kill camel jockeys.

lol one of the comments posted on a bnp website article:

>the bbc (black brodecasting company) has more black than whites addverts have to have ethnics .its called primeing to get us use to seeing them so that they are exsepeded in britten its part of the new world order .wile we are consernd about the imagration it takes are mind of slipping in the new order so keep one eye on that back door

Lets keep Britain for the noble, intelligent, hard working, White Britons! Seriously if you fags love "britten" so much at least learn how to spell its fucking name

>>521180

I'm ok with this

>>520453

Lol, that poster is funny, seeing as both parties have an almost identical policy, except for cutting taxes and spending, there is no difference.

Blacks love the BNP.
Pic related, BNP chairman and his buddy.

>>521221

Yeah but when your TV stops working because the saudi's wont sell us fuels and you cant watch Jeremy Kyle anymore you will have a sudden change of heart.

>>521233

I lol'd, look at Griffin's face you can tell he's thinking "Dirty fucking nigger".

>>521236

>implying I watch TV

Look at the bright side, all the BNP fags would otherwise vote UKIP or Tory anyway.
Let them waste their votes and help the progressives:)

>>521221
Indeed. Especially the part about killing pedos, reforming education, giving aid to foreigners (when our own country is financially fucked) and cutting funding to the armed forces!

Wait, there's moar.

>>521006
ah yes, I vividly remember viewing a video depiction of the viceral violence that shall visit the vexed vox populi via the volumous votes for these vile, venemous vainglorious villains

Vote BNP take Britain back to when it ruled the world!

>>521261

financially fucked

>Implying our national debt isnt lower as a % of GDP than Germany's, France's, Japan's, America's, India's, Canada's, Argentina's and Italy's

>>521268

His looks let him down. Who the fuck wants to vote for someone that looks like a James Bond villain? I 100% support him but the masses would never, because of this reason and because The Sun spouting shit like "EVIL NARZZISSSSS"

>>521268
ftfy

>>521300

Are you like 14 years old? because no adult could possibly ever think this would happen.

Sigh. Think of all the advancements in human society throughout history, im talking about from the Ancient Greeks inventing debates and democracy, the Industrial Revolution, new farming techniques, medicines, electricity, computers, chemistry, physics, ending of slavery, womens rights, gey rights, universal healthcare, social security, all these advancements have each undoubtedly advanced us a little bit more from shit-flinging apes into civilised societies. Now i wonder how many of these advancements were down to open minded liberals, and how many were due to stubborn, negative conservatism. It also astonishes me that for all these advancements in society, some people have ALWAYS been against these changes. And today in the 21st century, conservatives still want to keep us back, to keep us divided - AND PEOPLE ARE STILL STUPID ENOUGH TO LISTEN.

If everyone had listened to conservatives since the dawn of intelligence, Man would still be living in caves and curing the flu with leeches.

Conservatism promotes stagnation and opposes progress, it encourages close mindedness and discourages questioning and hence progress

Aren't the BNP against only those blackies that Labour invited over in recent years (to gain votes)? For example Sierra-Leoneans, Somalians, Eritreans, Afghans and all the other worthless pieces of shit?

>>521318
Griffin is stepping down as chairman soon, and I hope the BNP then vote their manager as leader.

Pic related, the BNP babe who manages the party who could be next leader.

>>521318

Protip : people say they are NAZI's because they are almost politically identical to 1930's NAZI's.

Latest polls from the Guardian. Oh shit niggas Lib Dems on the rise! If the same rates continue next month they'll only be 1 behind Labour.

When it comes to immigrants, the BNP leader explains his parties position in this article - worth a read:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1221234/BNP-leader-Nick-Griffin-Lots-Hindus-Sikhs-ethnic-min
ority-Britons-support-anti-immigrant-views.html

>>521318

>implying he looks stylish enough to be a Bond Villain

Maybe a Bond henchman who gets killed off in one punch, but not a villain.

Now Putin, there's a man who looks like a Bond Villain.

>>521345

No they're not you fucking moron. + BNP Jews.

>>521348

>dailymail

Didn't even bother opening the link.

>>521363
Because you're ignorant? ._.

>>521345

That's why I vote for them because I have been a Combat 18 member since my teens and I am a "neo-nazi" who has been convicted for numerous attacks on pakis.

>>521348

More like:

>Lots of Hindus, Sikhs and ethnic minority Britons support my anti-Muslim views

>>521336
You can't cite earlier examples of "progress" to justify the new modern and dangerous forms of "progress".

Progressives want to take us back to the older managed economies of the Eastern Europe days. They want a social policy of engineering and management. People under progressive leadership would become just numbers in a computer.

>>521359

Oh I am sorry I didnt think there was a massive difference between scapegoating jews as a minority for problemns and scapegoating muslims.

Politically they are very simmilar, they are heavily left with a high amount of authoritarian social involvement.

>>521352
Without a doubt.

You just know Putin keeps a white Persian cat around somewhere....Mr. Bond.

>>521387
>my anti-Muslim views

>>521393
>Last time I checked there was no such thing as Jewish suicide bombers.

>authoritarian social involvement

This I do not see.

>>521374

No because I dont read trash written by second rate journalists when I have heard Nick Griffin explain in person his views on immigration.

Protip : he says it rather differently when not being interviewed.

http://www.communist-party.org.uk/

For REAL change!

>>521405
because it's bad for business, DUH

>>521341
moarrrrrrrrrrr

>>521421
Lemme guess, you're trolling or your a student?

>>521393

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJ_Kh8ecoxk&feature=related

>>521403

Cmon man, I'm a liberal sort of guy who disagrees with the extremist forms of Islam. All I was implying was that some Hindus and Sikhs only support the BNP because they're the only party that generally hates all Muslims. The fact that the BNP's core membership sees no difference between Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs doesn't bother them apparently.

>>521417
Ohhhhh.... so what did you hear?

>>521437

Neither, just your average working man.

>>520654
ALL the parties (except the ones involved in that 1984 book prank) would vote to keep the CCTVs and for more of them. That's the way governments work.
The U.S. has been lucky so far, and Canada seems an abnormality.

Australia is headed Britain's way faster than Britain.

The BNP have an advisor on Islamic Extremism; a pakistani Hindu.

>>521390

What the hell are you talking about?

>dangerous forms of "progress".
Gay rights? healthcare for all? Social Security? Womens rights? Im struggling to see how any of these advances are "dangerous"

>>521458
>The U.S. has been lucky so far
businesses in big cities are full of cameras, nobody's bitching

>>520636

PROTIP: It's not as bad as the tabloid newspapers would have you believe.

>>521449
Maybe we could get some different badges or something, you know, to distinguish between them. I guess the stars have been taken already, but we could still have crescents for the Muslims, daggers for the Sikhs and a big fucking elephant badge with 15 arms for the Hindus!

I find it hard to believe anyone would vote Conservatives again after what they did last time they were in, it just amazes me.

>>521479
Oh, well, if you've only given up 50% of your personal liberties then it's just no big deal.

Big Brother ONLY watches you from 9am - 5pm, you big babies, jeeeeeeeeeeeeze, getting all up in arms

>>521474
>Gay rights? healthcare for all? Social Security? Womens rights? Im struggling to see how any of these advances are "dangerous"

There you go again. Read what I said:
>You can't cite earlier examples of "progress" to justify the new modern and dangerous forms of "progress"

>>521488

>>521336 here

me fucking too bro, me fucking too

>>521451

Basically in a nutshell Nick Likes it this way:

-Banning freedom of religion (Islam not allowed)

-Banning personal freedom no more gay or interaccial marriage, apartheid (its better that certain peoples should stick to their own kind) etc

-'persuading' those who arent white to leave

-Inferred that their commitment to democracy is BS

Its all generally stuff he has also been caught saying over and over again in interviews and people secretly recording him.

>>521504
yes you can, social progress is always good, and there's a lot to be done too

>>521493

Oh sorry, I misread you. I thought you were complaining about the immigrants sapping our jobs and social services.

I'd mostly agree with you on the worrying shift Britain's taking into a surveillance state. Except for CCTV cameras in public places. Never understood the fuss about them from a civil liberties point of view. I don't support them because they don't really work in stopping crime, not because they're looking at me walking down the street.

>>521504

shit, maybe my liberal nigger-loving brain isnt as fast as your turbo charged Aryan brain. please point out to this rather slow liberal how any of the advancements i mentioned are in any way dangerous

>>521477
That's because they are private businesses and have the right to have cameras for their own protection. Liberals claim there is a "right" to privacy in the US constitution. Or, is that only for women wanting abortions?

>>521405

Look up the Jewish defence league, there are plenty of Jews who have slaughtered or tryed to slaughter innocent civilians.

>>521532
in the gun-banned, post 9/11 NYC you don't have a right to shit

that's how overcrowded places are run everywhere in the world, or you get the fuck out to Alabama or something ....

>>521488
I wasn't really old enough to experience what maggie really did, but what I do know is that my granddad hated that women till the day he died, the stories he told me really hit me hard, and even though it probably wouldn't effect me now either I will never be voting conservative, my letter came through the mail today. I'll be voting LibDems.

>>521544
kahanists dont do shit they just want to order the army to do it for them.

I would vote for the BNP but they don't support the EU and the Euro...

Cameron is a cunt, who cares that he was backed by so many business leaders? Hes bound to, hes going to cut their taxes and maybe lick their balls and ring them afterwards. Business leaders don't care about the state of the economy, they care about profit. 'Business leaders' got us into this financial crisis why should we give a fuck what they think coming out of it?

>>521544

You dont need to look very far, photo is a Palestinian civillian executed on a street in broad daylight, the Israeli army then brings in a bomb disposal robot in a quite frankly lazy attempt to pass him of as a shot suicide bomber. I mean they carried him there, shot him at point blank, and THEN brought in the bomb robot

>>521390

>People under progressive leadership would become just numbers in a computer.

Implying that this would be a bad thing...government would be a lot fairer and better if instead of being:

Jake ugundu, black gay jew who needs positive discrimination to get anywhere...lets give him a tax break he is black after all

he was

Citizen 08483638476, + GDP quota, no criminal record, upstanding citizen, Investment in this unit is granted.

>>521564
>I wasn't really old enough to experience what maggie really did

don't worry, you're plenty old enough to witness the echoes and effects of her policies.

>>521582

The policies continued and expanded on by New Labour you mean?

>>521574
thats not israeli army idiot...

>>521569
Like the majority of British people.....

>>521592
what about this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynWjYHP91gA

>>521602
no sound on my computer. tell me what they say?

>>521588

yes, tony blair was effectively thatcher-lite. The 1997 labour party manifesto almost mirrors the 1979 conservative manifesto.
Brown is still a thatcherite shill, but hes a damn sight better than Cameron.

>>521564

Thatcher let 10 citizens (one of whom was a Westminister MP by democratic election, a member of her own Parliament) die on hunger strike in 1981, their only request was prisoner of war status, which they plainly were. They werent demanding Britain out of Ireland, nothing like that, they wanted to not be treated the same as rapists or thieves. They were at war with Britain, and she tore up the Geneva convention completely. She changed the law so that thousands of people could be arrested without evidence, tried without a jury, and imprisoned as criminals. Some of them were IRA, however loads were merely Catholic. No evidence, no jury, no trial, 10 years in jail. In 1981 they stood up for their rights as political prisoners, and she let them die one by one, including Bobby Sands MP.

Is it any wonder why the IRA were winning for twenty years

okay i really like the bnp i know its a vote wasted but they really connect with my ideas but my family have mainly been liberal democrat and i agree with thier policies as well so i guess the question is...who the fuck should i vote for? is ther like a hibrid of Nick Glegg and Nick Griffin and i wont take Nick Griffgg for a answer

>>521611
in uk they can legally let hunger strikers starve?

>>521488
Why? What happened last time?

>>521619

you sound like a fucking idiot. and you don't sound old enough to vote.

>>521619
Nick Glegfin?

W/e is closest to communism, but isn't communism is good with me.

>>521626

...you must be from the south east

>>521629
no he's more like this.

>>521606
Things everyone knows.
Israeli lobby in the US is strong.

>>521623
Well the government can't force you to eat.

>>521646
in most places they force you to eat

>>521619
Fuck your parents and Vote BNP.

>>521598
I'm Welsh actually, I support the EU and believe that the UK must accept the euro one day.

>>521686

You have no right to talk about the UK.

Go fuck some sheep.

Poorfags with delusions of grandeur vote for the conservatives.

Just like in Murrica. Instead of 'dere takin our jerbs' it's 'Ther taykin' our johbs they are'

>>521640
No I was born in 1990, fagbreath. WTF happened that was sooooo bad it's better to have muds everywhere???

>>521657 yea but they havent said what they would do about the budget or cuts infact since late 2009 i havent even heard from them besides you have to admit it griffin crumbled on question time which made me really debate do i want a stumbling idiot running my country?

What would happen if Obama came out supporting Labour?

>>521703

me too, but I'm not a giant mong and I have a modicum of political knowledge.

I'm voting for Enoch Powell.

>>521703
You are the age of my little sister....your opinion is fucking invalid.

>>521710
Conservative landslide victory.

>>521710

Have you seen the way obama has snubbed brown before? He may be charismatic but the guy is a dick when it comes to relations with europe.

>>521713 i would

>>521703

>oh look it's that image again.mp3

>>521721
>He may be charismatic but the guy is a dick when it comes to relations with europe.

wow maybe Obama can do something right

whats stopping this country being run by hung parliament? honsetly

>Thatcher was incensed by one contemporary view within the British Civil Service that its job was to manage the UK's decline from the days of Empire and she wanted the country to assert a higher level of influence and leadership in international affairs. She represented the newly energetic right wing of the Conservative Party and advocated greater independence of the individual from the state and less government intervention

Can we vote maggie back in? She will fix the mess that england is in for sure.

>>521721
>Have you seen the way obama has snubbed brown before?

LOL you don't understand the Washington politics --
back then Brown's chances were negligible.
They can totally stage another photo op before the elections.

>>521735
Politics, that's what.

I'm voting for my local BNP candidate.
Pic related.

>>521703

What happened? Poorfag white chav scum decided they were too good to actually do any work and would rather watch daytime TV and drink carlsberg special brew. We had to get 'muds' in to replace them.

>>521715
I am the future. My opinion is more valid than yours. AHAHAHAHAHA!!!

>>521737
I was surprised to find she's still alive

>>521713
Powell has to be one of the greatest British politicans in history. RIP, sir.

>>521737

this recent financial crisis was brought about by the very same economic theories that thatcher popularised. The only good thing about her being alive is that it delays her inevitable state funeral and the seizure that I will get from witnessing such blatant hypocrisy.

Average BNP voter

>I dont want to work....give me money government

Government brings in foreign workers to replace lazy fuckers and to pay for BNP voters to do nothing

>how dare those immigrants come to my country and steal MY JOBS!!!!

http://www.totalpolitics.com/magazine_detail.php?id=809

Read this interview.

Griffin cant make his mind up about anything. Wants a Britain that supports the working class but also wants to put Tariffs on all goods and increase VAT which would double the price of goods.

Oh and hes leaving before the EUP can investigate his expenses. Rumor around BNP camps is that most of its going to his Croatian beach house retirement and to the election fund for the General election which would get him done for fraud and tax evasion.

Oh and you paid taxes for that. lol.

>>521737

and how it worked in practice: the richest got even richer, everybody else got fucked. Her voodoo economics didn't work really well even tho she privatized the whole fucking country.

also this>>520641

.......and then you read the BNP membership list and realise what a load of bollocks you just said.

also thatcher snatched away all of the milk

>>521785

Yeah cause it wasnt like failing nationalised industry was costing the government (and in turn you) billions in tax dorrahs.

If you work in a buisness that fails its hardly the governments fault for refusing to prop you up with tax dorrahs that could be better spent on something like the nhs.

Also thatcher sorted out the unions which is more than browns willign to do atm (now theres lots of strikes cause the unions are getting cocky again which will result in buisnesses collapsing and unemployment rising)

HAY! I just joined the BNP. <3

>>521785

Yeah I must say I feel really bad about those policies sitting here in my affordable housing with the proceeds of 20 years of rapid economic expansion and social development.

One thing stormfags/socialistfags cant grasp:

Life is better in the UK than it has ever been.

>>521811
Nig nog.

>>521759
the guy was trapped in a post world war 2 mentality, he legitimately argued that britain should ally with the soviet union after the reunification of germany to balance out power in europe.

>>521826

Wow your insult is pathetic...and very misplaced, I love my blonde hair and blue eyes.

>>521811
>sitting here in my affordable housing

oh my god were you asleep when the housing bubble burst? Thats another one on Thatcher btw.

what would you do if you had the tories and the lib dems in a hung parlaiment
mindfuck

>>521811
>Life is better in the UK than it has ever been.

therefore thatcher's political influence still doesnt harm us, yeah nice logic you moron.

>>521847
lib dem would ally with labour most likely

I want a hung parliament, it would be awesome

>>521810

Because you hate Muslims so goddamn much

>>521856

Its mainly thanks to Thatcher and her ideas that we have a modern working economy and arent a full blown socialist shit hole with government subsidised industries that cant pay for themselves.

>>521810

a clean shaven sikh with no turban = a shameful sikh

>>521802

you can privatize stuff only once, people can argue it was not hers to sell in the first place, but I don't even wanna go there

Everybody knows how to make monopolies profitable. Increase the prices, cut services for the poorest and disadvantaged. Shit on development, etc etc
Private companies don't care about anything but profit!
So now you have shit overpriced service that doesn't serve the needs of the society, congratulations, IT DOESN'T COST YOU MONEY ANYMORE!

Oh wait, it does... because you have to pay the bills.

>>521786

Less than 50 people on that list were making £100,000+ a year though.

Griffin was pissed it was leaked because it showed that he couldn't get backers for the party to fund their campaigns. Its why they have to skive for donations off their own members a lot.

Not because of fear of reprisal though. lol.

>>521881
>with government subsidised industries that cant pay for themselves

what you mean like nokia?
or toyota?
or the whole of germany?

Government subsidies != propping up a failing business, sometimes you have to INVEST in and NURTURE an industry before it can compete globally. now instead of subsidising and investing in an industry that could be profitable in the future, we made everyone involved unemployed and created a generation of children that have never seen their parents go to work. Hardly economically sensible.

Besides, Thatcher and her deregulatory policies landed us in the shit. This financial crisis is a classical economic policy driven crisis. Don't even try to claim that Thatcher was good for the economy.

>>521923
Mmm. And they can't get financial backers because in this Labour controlled country you can lose your job for belonging to certain political parties.

>>521937
Incentivizing failure is corporatism and destroys real competition.

>>521943
>because in this sensible country you can lose your job for being a racist scumbag

sounds sensible to me

>>521937

>Modern technology buisness

You are right they are exactly the same as heavy manual industries that the rest of Europe also exported abroad.

>>520478
>Labour's move to the right killed Britain.
>Democrats move to the right kill America.
fixd

>>521966

That isn't incentivising failure, its simply allowing an industry to grow. The free market is no place for a weak industry. Internal competition is irrelevant, these industries have to compete globally.

>>521981
>Modern technology buisness

Germany is an industrial powerhouse you moron. They didn't export it abroad at all.

>>521943

Actually its all political parties if you are in the MOD, Rescue Services, Police Forces and Crown Prosecution Service

With jobs like teaching and the civil service, its if your political party is legally allowed to stand. There are plenty of UKIP voters and they hate immigrants as much (If not more) than BNP members who also teach and are in the civil service.

The BNP are thick because they wont reword their policy the way the courts want and they cry and sulk every time they lose. It just proves how shit they are at politics as well since you need to know how to contravine the law and then change it once you are in power. Thats the smart way. They are just trying to bludgeon it in and keep crying and sulking when they loose.

How can you trust someone as dimwitted as that with a country?

>>521973
Which BNP policy is racist?

>>522045

Oh and before we get any BaaaaaaaawNP fags trying to say its an outrage.

Its still legal for all those above to vote. They are just not allowed express allegiance to a political party due to the judgement required on the job.

>>522057

only just recently stopped being whites only

roots in the national front/white nationalism/combat 18/red watch

its all heavily documented, Nick Griffin is too dim to realise that he and his party have already shown their true colours in multiple documentaries/reports/interviews and that a last minute image change will do nothing but sprinkle sugar on the shit that is their reputation.

>>522045
I know teachers who support the BNP, one person is even related to me.
There are no problems at all and I don't see why there would be. You can disagree with immigration and multicultralism without hating everyone.
The ban is put in place because Labour are shit scared of the BNP and are trying to put people off from joining them or backing and making them look like evil outcasts etc...etc...

>>522089
>only just recently stopped being whites only

It was NEVER whites only. The party had only allowed people of British ethnic origin to join.
White Europeans from countries like Poland would be dismissed just as fast as Africans/Asians.

>>522094
>There are no problems at all

you see no problem with the fact that a teacher has connections to a party linked with violent, racist organisations?

>>522089

what's wrong with being whites only? Britain has been inhabited by whites only for like 40,000 years so i guess britain is a racist island