Posting mode: Reply
[Return]
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
File
Password(Password used for file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 3072 KB.
  • Images greater than 250x250 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Read the rules and FAQ before posting.
  • このサイトについて - 翻訳


  • Introducing 4chan 2.0 (beta) — now with Facebook Connect!


    File : 1270156490.gif-(21 KB, 340x353, minwage.gif)
    21 KB Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:14 No.512677  
    Should minimum wage be abolished?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:15 No.512680
    Should be do this before or after Mexican amnesty?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:16 No.512685
    Yes. Forcing employers to pay a minimum wage is retarded. The free market would ensure that cheap skate employers would have no employees...
    >> Ω 04/01/10(Thu)17:16 No.512686
    Should we invite Mexico to the union?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:17 No.512690
    If I ever start a business I'm not even going to bother with this shit, anything that can be outsourced will.

    >unions
    >minimum wage
    >health care

    LOL.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:17 No.512691
    >>512685
    this
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:19 No.512697
         File1270156768.jpg-(30 KB, 338x300, 1259611105715.jpg)
    30 KB
    >>512685
    >implying it is a good idea to allow business owners full control of their business, because they have such a history of playing nice with society.

    There is a reason why we need stuff like health and safety inspections.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:19 No.512698
    In an ideal world where there is complete transparency, perfect rationality, no transaction costs, etc. there is no use for a minimum wage.

    Of course, since we don't live in that world it is a useful tool for helping to balance the otherwise lopsided relationship between employers and employees. The only trick is finding the right level. And no, the free market isn't going to find it for us, because the international community doesn't play that way so neither should we.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:19 No.512699
    Force employers to offer healthcare, then force them to pay a minimum wage, force them to hire minorities, force unions upon them.....then bitch when they outsource.

    Lol liberals
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:20 No.512705
    >>512697
    And yet people still violate the health and safety codes or bribe officials and get away with it.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:20 No.512707
    >>512697
    im okay with that, but minimum wage should be abolished
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:20 No.512708
    >>512685
    >>512691

    In the current working environment? No, it won't.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:21 No.512713
    >>512708
    elaborate please
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:21 No.512715
    >>512705
    you can't even bathe in a Burger King kitchen sink without getting busted
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:22 No.512717
    Teenagers should be payed below minimum wage. At least teens who are supported by their parents.

    Why should a business owner pay full price for a snot noses bitch?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:22 No.512718
    >>512705
    Exactly, yet these are the same people saying who argue that there shouldn't be minimal wage. You know what would happen? They would undervalue all of their employees, including educated ones.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:23 No.512721
    >>512705
    And it's a crime, and punished when it is caught. Your comment is like saying "well some people still get away with theft/rape/murder, so we should legalize it!" If you honestly think that it makes no difference, open a history book. Look at the Gilded Age. Or look up "elixir sulfanilamide."
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:23 No.512722
    >>512718
    Yeah because Prices don't matter.

    DERP
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:23 No.512725
    >>512718
    they would find a new job if they were underpayed
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:24 No.512732
    >>512721
    My point is nothing like that.

    Safety and health standards are violated all the time. A lot of good that all those laws did. Especially when you can bribe officials.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:24 No.512733
    BAWW, my company can't make a profit threshold of 75% so I'll have to fire some employees. We should abolish greed, not minimum wage.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:24 No.512735
    >>512722
    Maybe if CEOs weren't so overpaid. Compare the states to other countries and you get to see how ridiculously overpaid they are.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:24 No.512738
    >>512733
    >I CAN COUNT TO POTATO

    How's that GED working out for you Rufus?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:24 No.512739
    >>512733

    Why do you hate freedom?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:25 No.512742
    >>512717
    I'd be okay with this. It can be hard to get hired as a teenager these days, slightly less pay and I'm sure it'd be easier for them to find work and it's not like they need to make 8/hour.

    But I'm no expert.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:25 No.512743
    >>512733
    abolish being human while youre at it
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:25 No.512745
    >>512735
    >CEOs
    >overpaid

    No I'm pretty sure companies value their services at what they pay for or else they wouldn't hire them to being with.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:26 No.512751
    >>512732
    > Safety and health standards are violated all the time. A lot of good that all those laws did.

    So it is in fact exactly your point. "The law is violated all the time, so we shouldn't have it." That's absurd. It isn't a binary issue, it's a question of degree and frequency.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:26 No.512752
    get rid of employment taxes and go to the fairtax system
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:26 No.512755
    >>512751
    So you're saying companies wouldn't provide good service without laws?

    HAHAHA HOW DOES I MARKET
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:26 No.512756
    >>512745
    You mean investors...you know, the ones who don't do anything for the company besides throw some cash in yet do not produce anything.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:26 No.512757
    No, unless we get rid of welfare, there won't be any incentive for anyone to work.

    The question should be, "should we abolish welfare and the minimum wage?"

    A definite yes without a doubt, it'll put all those blue collar morons in their place and remind them of how grateful they should be just to have a job that pays anything. Oh and no welfare would force people not to have kids they can't afford and make people become more proactive in regards to actually finding a job.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:27 No.512758
    >>512756
    >who don't do anything

    Sorry risking millions of dollars and your financial future is doing something. It's more than you're doing right now.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:27 No.512760
    >>512757
    >Oh and no welfare would force people not to have kids they can't afford
    I don't believe this at all. People are stupid and sex feels good.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:28 No.512764
    >>512756

    Are you fucking stupid?

    They provide the capital for the company. They have the most important role.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:28 No.512768
    >>512733
    5/10
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:28 No.512771
    >>512745
    You're assuming things like perfect rationality and a complete lack of conflicting motives or personal relationships. That's not how it plays out in reality, the upper levels of corporations will frequently get paid ridiculously well even if they run the company into the ground.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:29 No.512774
    A funny story for you all, if you will.

    There was a point in time when tipping waiters was uncommon. It was just something people did to get themselves prioritized. Something like, "Hey, if you get my food first, have some money for yourself." Eventually, everyone started doing it.

    So what happened in response? Employers found that they would then cut their waiter's wages, keep the food the same price, and keep more money for themselves. It was no longer a "Hey, you earned that money", it was a "Hey, you don't need this money anymore." And now we have one of the most retarded customs in the food business, and its enforced.

    It's shit like this that makes me lose trust for employers. Minimum wage is a necessary evil.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:29 No.512778
    >>512764
    >implying gambling with other people's money = important
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:29 No.512782
    Dude the government can't do anything right. We don't need any health or safety standards or any government regulation. They are just a waste of taxpayer money. Let the businesses do this shit.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:29 No.512783
    >>512760
    Now, if only the social conservatives would stop getting in the way of more widely available contraceptives. Then we might actually be able to at least mitigate that problem.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:30 No.512785
    >>512685
    Except it's the same thing with banana nations. They will sell their products for us dirty cheap, since they can't try to raise the price in fear that we would buy it from elsewhere - it's the one and only import they have, and if no-one buys it, they will all suffer. So they will have to sell the bananas and others to us dirty cheap and suffer a bit less.

    Remember that, when you're buying bananas. They are delivered to you through poverty and suffering.

    Yeah, FREE MARKET WOHOO
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:30 No.512786
    >>512778
    >gambling with other people's money

    HOLY SHIT IT'S LIKE YOU ARE AN UNEDUCATED RETARDED FACTORY WORKER FROM THE FUCKING 20s!
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:30 No.512791
    >>512778

    >gambling

    12 year old detected. Go back to yeswecan.org
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:30 No.512792
    >>512745
    companies are just afraid to change anything when they are doing well, so they keep the same tool in place as CEO and pay him more and more out of fear of him changing the company's outcome somehow when in reality, he does nothing special and has no unique productivity skills.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:31 No.512798
    >>512757

    you cant be serious
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:32 No.512808
    >>512785

    Workers in nations wouldn't agree to a wage that isn't fair. Thus your banana republic theory is laughable and idiotic.

    They don't sell goods for fear we will buy them else where. They sell goods cheap because that's their market price.

    If they were selling them cheaper than valued then we'd be constantly facing shortages.

    Jesus tap dancing christ.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:32 No.512809
    >>512792

    You're an idiot.

    CEOs have to answer to shareholders. If they suck, they get the fucking boot.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:32 No.512810
    >>512792
    >he does nothing special and has no unique productivity skills.

    Sure is opinions and not fact in here.
    >> Playtheist !gzXhkZXBZA 04/01/10(Thu)17:32 No.512811
    >>512757
    > no welfare would force people not to have kids they can't afford

    Don't be ridiculous.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:35 No.512826
    Why don't we just kill the poor?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:35 No.512827
    >>512808
    Our nations can afford not to have bananas for a while, but they can't afford it.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:35 No.512828
    >>512811
    Yes it would. And if they had kids anyway knowing they had no way to raise or support those kids they would starve to death and therefore those kids wouldn't do the same thing.

    At some point someone has to make a stand and say I'm sick of this fucking cycle.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:35 No.512831
    >>512826
    thats a little harsh, i prefer just letting them die
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:35 No.512833
    >>512826
    because the politicians rely on the poor to be easily brainwashed and later vote for them
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:36 No.512837
    >>512782
    >The government can't do anything right

    Lolno. There's some things they aren't good at, but lolno.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:36 No.512847
    >>512809
    And they get sweet severence packages, bro
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:37 No.512855
    >>512810
    It's a CEOs goal to get on board a company that is about to boom because of a product or service that they foresee coming into demand and then hold its future hostage by having a grip on shareholder confidence.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:38 No.512857
    no welfare--> baby gets no food
    lot of welfare---> mother doesnt get job
    low welfare---> mother takes it, baby suffers from malnutrition
    FUCK
    >> FALCON (PatriotGames) !!o7p6TsaYgyo 04/01/10(Thu)17:39 No.512872
    >>512717
    because they will higher more of them pushing down demand for other workers.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:40 No.512880
    >>512872
    thats why min wage should be banned for everyone not just teens
    >> Ω 04/01/10(Thu)17:42 No.512889
    Sometimes I make the mistake of humoring the idea of a laissez-faire economy. Fortunately, idiotic ideas like these remind me why that's a horrible idea.

    It would be a disastrous ripple effect. You imbeciles act like there is infinite employment, infinite space, and infinite resources to facilitate your HURRR COMPLETE ECONOMIC FREEDUMB demands. There isn't.

    As wages were lowered across the board, millions more would drop below the poverty line. They're not free to seek employment elsewhere because it would happen across the board, and simple supply and demand would drive wages even lower as people desperate for work, any work, would be competing for these shitty jobs. Welfare and unemployment would spike, workers would be unable to afford the products they used to buy. A feedback loop would stop the velocity of the dollar dead. Businesses would close and curse the day they listened to those faggot anarchists. Increasing thrift and markedly more conservative loans would create a liquidity trap.

    Say hello to ACTUAL socialism as the government nationalizes whole sectors to fuel its publics works projects, and forges a new liberal political system, bitches.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:47 No.512936
    >>512889
    stfu commie
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:48 No.512947
    >>512889
    3/10
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:52 No.512984
    I think that the minimum wage be expanded to a living wage.

    In most areas of the country, you can't get a decent place to live unless you're willing to live in a crime ridden area. Because of the high cost of housing and living costs, they are forced to live paycheck to paycheck, with no money for disposable income or to put away for savings.

    The minimum wage in America should be twice of what is currently is today: From $7.50 a hour to $14 an hour.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:53 No.512986
    >Should minimum wage be abolished?
    yes
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:55 No.512999
    >>512677
    >Should minimum wage be abolished?

    No. Corporations already have too much advantage.

    Tooltip: They're usually the ones paying minimum wage
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:56 No.513007
         File1270158996.jpg-(12 KB, 287x350, adamsmith.jpg)
    12 KB
    Our merchants and master-manufacturers complain much of the bad effects of high wages in raising the price, and thereby lessening the sale of their good both at home and abroad. They say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits. They are silent with regard to the pernicious effects of their own gains. They complain only of those of other people.

    Adam Smith
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:58 No.513021
    yes
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:59 No.513029
         File1270159161.jpg-(131 KB, 331x459, MyNigga1.jpg)
    131 KB
    >>513007
    >Adam Smith
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)17:59 No.513032
    >>512889
    I hate your social views but what you say here is compelling.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:03 No.513061
    >>512826
    Because the Dems need them; the poor are stupid enough to believe that Democrats actually care about them and their problems.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:03 No.513062
    >>512889
    but if no one is willing to work for shit wage, the companies have to raise the wages.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:04 No.513070
    >>512889
    liberal idiot communist detected
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:05 No.513079
    >>513062

    It'd be too late.

    It's like plunging your hand in a vat of acid, you can pull it out but the damage is already done
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:07 No.513088
    >>512677
    No, even at its current level, minimum wag is not livable in any areas except the most rural areas.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:07 No.513093
    >>513062
    >but if no one is willing to work for shit wage, the companies have to raise the wages

    Oh but they've already found those that do work for shit wage... under the table.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:08 No.513101
    >>513093
    kick illegals the fuck out
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:08 No.513102
    >>513093
    Thank you for proving point that many businesses are willing to do illegal practices just to save a few bucks.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:09 No.513106
    >>512677

    Minimum wage is worthless because of a multitude of reasons:

    1. Every state that suddenly raises the minimum wage also gets higher unemployment because employers can't afford having to pay more to employees.

    2. The price gets passed on to the consumer. You and I have to pay for higher priced products but so do the employees that make minimum wage. The extra amount of money you get from a minimum wage is pointless because it's spent on the cost of living that increases around you to afford a higher minimum wage. It cancels itself out.

    3. It increases inflation and devalues the dollar.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:29 No.513282
    >>513106
    >1. Every state that suddenly raises the minimum wage also gets higher unemployment because employers can't afford having to pay more to employees.

    Which employees? The Corporations or the small-businesses?
    >> Horo 04/01/10(Thu)18:31 No.513291
    >>513282
    >>513282
    Why the fuck does is matter?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:32 No.513301
    >>512677
    funny thing people got paid more then min wages

    when the gov put min wages in the biz all said, OH thats all we have to pay. And lowered what they were offering as starting pay accordingly.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:32 No.513307
    >impose minimum wage
    >trade with lower class is disincentivised
    >investment distorted away from creating jobs for unskilled workers
    >artificially low demand for unskilled labor
    >unskilled wages kept low
    >liberals call for raising the mimimum wage again

    God dammit. If you care so much about poor people then just raise taxes. At least you won't be hacking apart opportunities for no one BUT the people you're trying to help.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:33 No.513309
    >>513282
    All of them
    >> Ω 04/01/10(Thu)18:35 No.513328
         File1270161328.png-(179 KB, 707x645, Mine_PartyAli.png)
    179 KB
    >>512936
    >>513070

    Left-Libertarian, actually.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:36 No.513339
    >>513328
    I love how every time someone makes this chart nothing is in the same place as the previous chart
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:36 No.513340
    FUN FACT: 90% of Small Businesses FAIL in the first 5 Years.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:38 No.513350
    >>513070
    Um he didnt say anything that reflected upon whatever his political alignment is. Those words you use? Yeah they are not like fuck and shit, they are not arbitary curse words, They actually mean something. GO on over to a library and find out what they mean before tossing them around, as it makes you look like a complete retard.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:40 No.513368
    >>513340
    Wait I meant 50% fail in 5 years, 90% fail in 10 years.

    That's the reason they're so many small businesses, we include those who are about to go under and those who just started.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:40 No.513370
    >>513106
    If employers can't afford a living wage they obviously are failing at business.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:41 No.513376
    >>513328
    PNG isnt really anarchist

    also, yellow is what marxists think they area, red is what marxists really are
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:42 No.513377
    >>513340
    FUN FACT: I'm getting blazed.
    >> Ω 04/01/10(Thu)18:44 No.513390
    >>513376

    Yeah, I removed the quip about Marxists when I added the symbols. It's cleaner if less amusing this way.
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:45 No.513394
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca8Z__o52sk
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)18:45 No.513399
    as if the government should even have the power to set a minimum wage.... so stupid.
    >> Ω 04/01/10(Thu)18:53 No.513438
    >>513399
    >>513394

    Well now that there is a minimum wage, and you're so opposed to it, how would you have it lifted? No more raises to it ever again? Cut it off cold turkey and let 'the market' decide? What's your big solution?
    >> Anonymous 04/01/10(Thu)19:09 No.513539
    minimum sage



    [Return]
    Delete Post [File Only]
    Password
    Style [Yotsuba | Yotsuba B | Futaba | Burichan]
    Watched Threads
    PosterThread Title
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous7 yr-old pimped...
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous
    [V][X]Anonymous