this is communism

I doubt there will be a single leftist in here trying to defend this, because it's simply indefensible.

ahhh another to add to the list.

FOOD, banned in Britain.

I can't believe there are still people in this country who want to vote Labour again

more sensationalist crap that will never see the light of day?

>>334473
No it isn't.

OPs quote
>>>"It's about time something more was done to root out racism. Just that it is obvious that there are many cultures living in Britain so it is obvious that different foods belong to different cultures. If a child chooses to dislike a food it is as if the child is choosing to dislike someone of another culture. They are racist and should be taken into care and re-educated by their local authority and then placed with suitable parents with the natural parents facing court action. We need to make a firm stand against racism or it will never go away."

Is from a troll in the PUBLIC COMMENTS on the article, not the actual article. The actual article says
"It advises nursery teachers to be on the alert for childish abuse such as: "blackie", "Pakis", "those people" or "they smell". "

Yet another 'banned in britain' statement on 4chan that isn't actually true. I have not yet seen any....not a single case on 4chan ever....of someone using the phrase banned in britain about something true. It's always total bullshit.

Hey, check me out, I'm a liberal and I would vehemently oppose this.

I also oppose hatespeech laws. And support legislation to delineate a process for state secession.

This is weapons-grade stupidity.

>>334501

any item that can be reasonably considered a weapon-banned in Britain

>>334503
see
>>334501

>>334501

oh and

>they smell

THE SENSE OF SMELL, BANNED IN BRITAIN

Attempting to MAKE people embrace diversity and multiculturalism even though it is our natural instinct to oppose it = slavery.

>>334501
>The guide goes on to warn that children might also "react negatively to a culinary tradition other than their own by saying 'yuk'".

>Staff are told: "No racist incident should be ignored. When there is a clear racist incident, it is necessary to be specific in condemning the action."

>Warning that failing to pick children up on their racist attitudes could instil prejudice, the NCB adds that if children "reveal negative attitudes, the lack of censure may indicate to the child that there is nothing unacceptable about such attitudes".

>Nurseries are encouraged to report as many incidents as possible to their local council. The guide added: "Some people think that if a large number of racist incidents are reported, this will reflect badly on the institution. In fact, the opposite is the case."

Seriously bro. The government is telling people to report little kids to the "local council" if they say indian food or whatever is nasty. That's creepy and totalitarian as hell. I honestly hope people revolt soon and wipe these race-obsessed libs off the face of the fucking planet. They're destroying western society.

>>334522
see
>>334501

yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk yuk

Fuck you brits

>It's about time something more was done to root out racism.

HAHAHAHAHAHAH, Typical leftist and their silly utopia dream world. Wake the fuck up.

>>334528
Fuck you jackass. Yeah, the OP contained a quote from a comment page.

How about you read the article itself first, because it's exactly what the government is trying to do.

I like how nobody noticed that most of that was from some idiot in the comments section.

Well played OP.

>>334527
>Seriously bro. The government is telling people to report little kids to the "local council" if they say indian food or whatever is nasty.

No it is not.
The NCB is a CHARITY, not the government, and they have suggested nothing of the sort.
It is a clearly out of context quote merely saying that little kids may not like curry/whatever.
Don't believe what is implied in newspapers.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kRVEJyp42_QC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Young+Children+and+Ra
cial+Justice&source=bl&ots=F9JvFsJC9I&sig=H1ZjFpnygT_6UTrj9bydeeZgYg8&hl=en&ei=8
cebS9_cGc7KjAeV7L2iDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAw#v=o
nepage&q=&f=false

Is the actual 366 pages, feel free to read at your leisure.

>>334544
see
>>334573

>>334578
see
>>334521

>>334573
You're just an apologist for these people. Seriously, the multiculturalism garbage has gotten out of hand and it is dragging down the west. The racialist guilt-spreaders must be stopped.

>>334554

You clearly didn't read the thread. This was pointed out much earlier and almost nobody has reacted to the quote itself. You are short on reading comprehension.

More to the point: I don't see how you can regulate preference. . . OR sort out cases where children may be served food that is ill prepared or even rotten but not allowed to voice their displeasure for fear of being called racist.

I myself enjoy lots of different eastern dishes, but it's totall possible for restaurants to fuck it up and make a dish, that I would normally enjoy, be totally unpalatable.

Really the whole thing is just outrageous.

>>334578
>>334584
Look at you. We have an official true believer here guys.

Just give it up bro, everyone has seen what has been happening and most people are quite fed up with it.

Racism should leave, but not because of legislation.

This is the fucking future, and we still care about someone's customs instead of their value to society?

I'm against worthless motherfuckers. I don't make any generalizations about what groups are included in this, because it's some of every group. And they're worthless motherfuckers.

But I know a black man who is more intelligent than most white men I know, and makes more too.

I know an Arab who works as a Civil Engineer for the state DOT.

I know an asian who sells ecstasy for a living.

Just be against worthless motherfuckers. No need to generalize, then you miss some of them.

ITT: Asspained, cocksucking brits trying to defend their backwards retarded country.

PREPARE FOR MINDFUCK!


So, multiculturalism is indeed, racists. implying that a kid doesn't like food because its made by a paki is inherently racist. the food isnt made by a paki, its made by a person. just like a person might not like tomatoes, doesn't mean he doesn't like those GOD DAM DIRTY NO FUCKING GOOD ITALIANS.

GET IT?

>>334601
no

>>334585
Person A: "Person B has said not liking curry from birth is a sign of racism" (note, person B never said anything like that)
Person B(note, person B is not the govt):"calling someone a paki can be racist"

Americans on 4chan "the govt has banned taste in britain"

And then you wonder why people treat americans as trolls by default because it's not really possible to tell the difference...

>>334601

>racists

fuck, ib4 shitstorm

>>334609
Yes. You're blind to not see it. This is what the leftists have been pushing for years. If you disagree with ANYTHING that anyone of another skin color than yours then you are a racist. This only applies to white people of course.

>>334609

why, are you saying you see a paki different than a white man?

do you see his food different than a white mans?

>>334610
You've been brainwashed. I really don't know what else to say, just go kill yourself.

>>334588
>Really the whole thing is just outrageous.

It's not outrageous because it is TOTAL FICTION.
You can read the actual guidance yourself
>>334573
Feel free to try to find where is suggests disliking food is racist. (protip:it doesn't)

>>334619
because that's what you are saying with that comment.

>>334623
>The National Children's Bureau, which receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations, has issued guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to be alert for racist incidents among youngsters in their care.

>This could include a child of as young as three who says "yuk" in response to being served unfamiliar foreign food.

Are you intentionally being obstuse and just ignoring this?

>>334636
Reading is racist cause blacks aren't so good at it. Literacy banned in britain.

Here, you dumb fucking mong. Read this shit, it's directly from the book you cited.

>>334636

That is the article. I believe the person was asking for a reference from the actual manual, as opposed to what someone else said about the manual. He's looking for something that's not hearsay, like a page reference, for instance.

>>334654
Furthermore, if you actually read it, you'll notice that it leaves what the "reaction" means up to the closest adult of "local council". With this way people act now, claiming everything is "racist", this has drastic implications.

So go suck a cock you faggot.

>>334656
here
>>334654

Climb a wall of dicks.

>>334623

See >>334654


I wasn't about to start slogging through that document just to prove you wrong. But I'm glad that guy did. Get fucking told you limey cunt.

>>334654

Last line: "Care is always needed in following up such reactions to differentiate clearly between a child's natural apprehension and racial prejudice."

>>334636
There isn't an actual quote there, that's a reporter making up sensationalist crap.

There is an actual quote in the article:
""react negatively to a culinary tradition other than their own by saying 'yuk'"

That's it. Kids might not like foreign food, and might say 'yuk'. No impications that this is racist.

You can read the ACTUAL thing online
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kRVEJyp42_QC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Young+Children+and+Ra
cial+Justice&source=bl&ots=F9JvFsJC9I&sig=H1ZjFpnygT_6UTrj9bydeeZgYg8&hl=en&ei=8
cebS9_cGc7KjAeV7L2iDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAw#v=o
nepage&q=&f=false


I am saying that the article is TOTAL BULLSHIT, and I have provided a link to the actual guidelines (issued by a charity not the government)....as absolute proof of this.

Do not believe >implying
in newspapers, they make shit up to sell copy.

>>334660
WALL OF DICKS YOU SAY

>>334660

Hey, someone gave the guy what he was after. Kudos. I was just clarifying. No need to get all bitchy with me.

>>334666
I just cited it above. You can find the quote on page 221.

Britfag lefty status:

[x] Told>

>>334672
Not leftfag (not that americans use those labels even remotely sensibly), I've seen your quote, and stand by what I said. It definitely, inarguably, does not say that disliking foreign food is racist.

>>334678
It inarguably does.

Read the entire page 221

>a racist incident is any incident that is percieved to be racist by the victim or any other person

This is directly after the paragraph about food. If you don't see something wrong with this, then something is wrong with you yourself.

>>334678

>It definitely, inarguably, does say that disliking foreign food MIGHT be racist

fix'ed

Can't wait to leave this shitty little island...

It's about time something more was done to root out racism. Just that it is obvious that there are many cultures living in Britain so it is obvious that different foods belong to different cultures. If a child chooses to dislike a food it is as if the child is choosing to dislike someone of another culture. They are racist and should be taken into >"care and re-educated by their local authority and then placed with suitable parents with the natural parents facing court action. We need to make a firm stand against racism or it will never go away."

Fuck have any of you read some of these comments posted by leftist pricks...

>>334678

>BAWWWW reporting was simplified/out of context/ other token bullshit. . .here. .. have the several hundred page actual document.
>Finds the same quote deep within the actual document.
>BAWWWWWW

Goddamn you brits are fucking pathetic.

They're really pushing it. When the pendulum swings back, it'll swing back hard.

>>334686

See, I have been primarily arguing for the side supporting the bill as harmless, but this makes me consider. That's like saying any violent offense is one in which I am injured and perceive it to be someone else's afault.

To me, your offense is your own fault, and nobody should have to change their methodology or actions because of your offense. You should live with it, and grow some skin.

>>334721
>>334721

Hes not a brit, no sane british person would agree to this bullshit...

>>334686
>It inarguably does.

No.
I thank you for actually moving the discussion onto what is in the guidelines, rather than OPs invented quotes, but your suggestion just isn't correct.
Essentially everything boils down to what you quoted, everything else in the thread is...quite literally...fiction....
http://images.4chan.org/new/src/1268501759364.png

Read it. Is it saying disliking foreign food is racist?

No, it is not.

Even if it was saying that (which is definitely isn't), is it a ban?

No, it is a guideline.

Is it 'the government'?

No, it is a set of guidelines written by a charity worker for the charity National Childrens Bureau. Despite the word Bureau, is is a charity, and not the governments work at all, it is in no way official, it's just something someone wrote.

That is the OP, and all suggestions of 'X banned in britain' made in this thread completely, totally, destroyed.

>>a racist incident is any incident that is percieved to be racist by the victim or any other person

I agree, this is retarded, but it is just the opinion of one Jane Lane, a glorified private nursery worker, who I intend to ignore.

>>334737
It's not a bill. It's a set of guidelines issued by a childrens charity.

So what if a kid of one race says a kid of another race smells?

It is a nursery after all.

>>334501
Still, that's a violation of freedom of speech.

>>334801
I honestly don't understand what you're talking about.
What is a violation of freedom of speech?

>>334820

Saying that a child can be possibly punished for someone else's perception of what they said. It doesn't have to be meant as a racist statement, just taken as one.

>>334826
Oh yeah, was confused by you quoting a post that didn't mention that part. It's a ridiculous idea that racism is defined by the perception of the most easily offended person, but....as I hope has now been made clear, this is NOT a piece of legislation, it's just something someone wrote. There are stupid people, best just to ignore them,

>>334839

Yeah. That's what scares me about this kind of stuff. I live in a state where you can get arrested for calling someone a fag (hatespeech laws). We also have a large proportion of black people here, and anyone who has lived in the South knows the amount of both racism, and false racism claims that are made here. As often as someone is called a nigger, a black person takes someone who is not racist to be racist. I'm quite upset by the notion that someone's offense should be my burden, and not their own.