>That means that if you have a swastika, you are not allowed to walk around naked
I giggled a tiny bit at that.

germans are butthurt over that shit man...

k

haha europe is ours. be prepared to suffer, white man..

>WE ACCIDENTALLY THE JEWISH PEOPLE WHAT SHOULD WE DO?
You accidentally what?
>ALL THE JEWS.
Never talk about it again.

>>329359
Why do liberals always sage threads when shit gets too real for them?

Further proof that liberals do not care about Freedom of Speech.

If you don't agree with them it's a crime.

Holocaust: it definitely happened. If you question it, you go directly to jail.

Communism: it's definitely beneficial. If you question it, you go directly to gulag.

>>329374
at what point does freedom of speech protect someone when they are clearly spewing out hate??

>>329374
I'm sorry but I don't see liberals arresting 400 people outside of the RNC for peacefully protesting, only 200 or which were actually protesting or in the immediate area.

>>329386
At all points.

Otherwise any criticism can be labeled hate speech no matter how it is explained.

miss us yet?

Germany has been mighty butthurt since the end of WWII

>>329386

Swastika has been used since the days of Troy, it is also a symbol for Hindu culture, was used by Celts, Aboriginals, is used by Buddhists, so they all symbolise hate now?

>>329425
>>329425
more like before ww2.

>>329407
>taking it to the illogical extreme and calling it a point in my favor.
Hate speech is easy to identify. People protesting based on legitimate points? Protected.
Tattoo of the symbol of an oppressive regime that dedicated itself to the genocide of an entire race? Hate.
See? The difference is pretty fucking obvious if you're going to try and debate things seriously, instead of just going "hurr durr I'm going to exaggerate and win!"

>>329425
only because the jews that stayed behind started a program of "you're responsible for all the evils of the world."

what do we have no? emasculated faggots calling themsleves men, and german women spreading their legs for every shit skin they meet to prove they're not racist.

truly sad times we're living in.

>>329433
also used by many southwestern Native American tribes such as Hopi, etc.

>>329386
>freedom of speech
>clearly spewing out hate
In a society where you truly are "FREE" then spewing out hate comes with it.

>>329433
The Nazi swastika is different than those used in religious history.

>>329372
Yep, too real for me.

>>329440
>Tattoo of the symbol of an oppressive regime
sure is first grade history in here....

>>329433
The swastika is only hateful if it's rotated 45 degrees.

>>329440
hurr hurr durr everyone should should love each other and never hate any one under penalty of law hurr durr dur....

except if you're white. are you black and hate all white people? here have a government grant to spread your ideas, you poor little oppressed ape you...

Why's no one called Adolf anymore? We still have people called Josef, Mao, George and Mohamed.

Why no Adolfs?

>>329457
lie...

>>329470
Because when you name your kid Adolf, he gets taken away from you and sent to live with foster parents.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/state_removes_hunterdon_county.html

>>329470
true dat true dat.
>>329464
>the Nazi one is tilted on a 90 degree angle
No offense, but that would just make it look exactly the same as it was before the tilt, try 45 degrees

>people arguing that Nazi point of views should be protected
>closet Nazis

>>329386
You can't ban speech just because it's hateful or you don't like it. A free society allows EVERYONE to express themselves - not just the people the majority agrees with.
Protecting the rights of they minority is important if you ever want to maintain rights for all people.

>>329391
They can't in the US. But they would if they could. See Germany.

>>329457

So this swastika is okay?

lets clear a few things up...

the holocaust happened

swastikas represent many things, but in the contemporary mind one thing is recalled before all others - nazis

Germans are still wracked by a shit-ton of guilt for buying into national socialism, and the final solution.

>>329475
You obviously never paid attention in history class then.

>>329489
ITT PEOPLE THAT THINK BY TAKING AWAY SOME FREEDOMS FROM ONE GROUP TO MAKE ANOTHER FEEL FREER IS THE RIGHT THEN TO DO.

>>329501
VEE VERE IN POLAND! ZEY INVITED US! PUNCH WAS SERVED!

>>329470

>Josef, Mao, George and Mohamed.

The Genocidal Beatles?

>>329448
No. It's not.

Anyone arguing on behalf of the Nazis is either a Nazi or someone arguing simply for the sake of arguing. You know you don't give a fuck about this, just fucking admit it and move on.

>>329519
yup. Nazi lovers fall into two categories; ignorant trolls, or ignorant racists.

>>329519
>Anyone arguing on behalf of the [NAME_HERE] is either a [NAME_HERE] or someone arguing simply for the sake of arguing.
Hmm.... I'm going to use that line from now on in all the arguments I found worthy of it.

>>329501
Yes, they let their guilt make them do stupid things. That's how liberals work. Rather than making rational decisions to protect freedom of speech for all people, they let their guilt stupefy themselves into making emotional decisions to ease their butthurt.

I thought liberals were supposed to be tolerant of all views, no matter how backward or contrary to theirs.

Oh silly liberals. You so crazy. At least right wingers are honest about their intentions of totally stamping out any opposition.

>>329527

>ignorant racist

You prefer the informed type?

>>329527
>ignorant trolls, or ignorant racists.
Oh how hypocritical and ironic.

>>329519
Personally, I don't see what's so wrong about collecting Nazi propaganda. Hell, I don't see any problem about discussing the finer points of Nazi leadership. I get annoyed by "lulz the holocaust didn't happen gais" types, but history doesn't support them anyway.

I can also see why it's a touchy subject in Germany, so I don't fault them too much for being heavy-handed about it.

>>329536
Of course they don't prefer the informed, well read racist. Because the intelligent racist absolutely massacres them in all debates.

>>329536
No such thing. I don't care how educated they are, the minuscule genetic dissimilarities in humans of different races are not enough to account for staggered intelligence levels.

>>329519
>ad hominem

Your argument is invalid.

>>329535
As I said this millions of times on /new/:
LIBERALS ARE HYPOCRITES.

I know a black dude that works in Ikea Atlanta named Adolf. Not even trolling right now. True fucking story.

Is anyone ITT actually from Germany? Because complaining about something that doesn't, can't, and won't ever affect you...pretty fucking retarded.

>>329549
No such thing. I don't care how educated they are, the minuscule genetic dissimilarities in primates of different species are not enough to account for staggered intelligence levels.

>>329546
>>329546
You both are racist, now move along and stop being a hypocrite.

>>329549
You do realize that there's only a one percent difference between the genetic code of mankind and apes, right? A miniscule difference in genetics can make a huge difference in an organism.

>>329561
So much irony

>>329559

My girlfriend is German, does that count?

>>329363
>Never talk about it again.
German here. I hear this quite often from foreigners, although it's pretty much the opposite of how our government and the media actually deal with our history. Adolf's dirty deeds are usually overexposed in the media in the form of documentaries, etc. What's strictly banned, though, is all the stuff that could be considered a glorification of the Nazi regime, which is why stupid shit like the OP's story can happen.

>>329549
>I don't care how educated they are, the minuscule genetic dissimilarities in humans of different races are not enough to account for staggered physical prowess.

Genetics can account for all kinds of variety in physical attributes, but can't really account for mental differences. Sure.

>>329566
We share 60 percent of our DNA with fruit flies.

STOP BEING WASIS AND GIVE THE FRUIT FLIES EQUAL RIGHTS!

Jews are in complete control. Even of your body.

>>329576

We also share 50% the same dna as bananas.

>>329581
END THE BREEDING AND GENOCIDE OF SEMI HUMAN BANANAS TODAY!

>>329556
He has earned a free visa to Sweden.

>>329575
>Genetics can account for all kinds of variety in physical attributes, but can't really account for mental differences. Sure.
BUT I THOUGHT GAY PEOPLE ARE GAY BECAUSE OF GENETICS! WHY IS LIBERAL PHILOSOPHY SO INCONSISTENT?

MY PUNY LIBERAL BRAIN HURTS, I BETTER GO READ SOME HUFINGTON POST TO RELIVE MY PAIN

>>329589

We also share 90% of our dna with mice.

>>329602
STOP SUPPORTING THE GENOCIDE OF OUR FOUR LEGGED HUMAN COUSINS! STOP GIVING MONEY TO PEST CONTROL COMPANIES!

FREEDOM FOR ALL OF HUMANITY!

I don't share my DNA with anything. Use a condom fuckers.

>>329632
0/10 troll harder

/r/ sauce on these DNA stats, I'm legitimately curious. Prior, I had only known that our closest extant ancestor was the Chimpanzee.

>>329652

Anything that gets a response is automatically > 0/10. 1/10 at least. Thanks to you!

>>329653
Feminists say that Bonobos are our closest relative, because the females are the dominant gender in that species of ape (and only that species).

>>329667
hmm ic your point. While we are on the topic lets come up with a standardized trolling scale with meanings:
0/10 - No one responses to the troll[complete failure]
1/10 - Receive response to failed troll

I remember when I was in pre-school. Kids where like. Germany's an evil land. and the swastika is an evil symbol. Since I grew up in India partially, then moved back to America, I was like. "No it isn't."

Am I rasis?

>>329688
>Kids where like.
>rasis
yes you are a rasis

>>329653
I know the monkey one is true, but the others are just trolling.

>>329688
Yes. You are an evil, evil wasis. Get ready to be relocated to a prison in the name of the unquestionable good that is multiculturalism.

ITT: Racists that have never taken a biology class in their lives read a DNA study and misinterpret the research

Fucking morons. DNA is made up of the same shit in nearly everything, sure. The difference is the amount of chromosomes, type of reproduction, and the way the DNA is coded. There is almost no difference between any organism as far as protein goes, but the way the strands of DNA work to make each species unique. There isn't even a shred of evidence to prove that races of people are even more diverse than dog breeds, for crying out loud.

Sometimes you misinformed losers make me cringe with your stupidity. Gb2 creationism, it at least made your arguments slightly more sound due to insanity.

>>329699
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2004/03feb_fruitfly.htm

>"About 61% of known human disease genes have a recognizable match in the genetic code of fruit flies, and 50% of fly protein sequences have mammalian analogues."

ITT: Your egalitarian fantasy comes crashing down.

Liberal Status:

TOLD : [X]
FUCKING TOLD : [X]
NOT TOLD : []

>>329704
That still doesn't address the fact that liberals will claim genetic differences have no affect on mental attributes, but will readily accept that they do cause physical differences.

>There isn't even a shred of evidence to prove that races of people are even more diverse than dog breeds, for crying out loud.

Yes, there is.

http://www.goodrumj.com/RFaqHTML.html

>>329704
scienz is faget

>>329721
Lol what? Liberals have championing the idea of a genetic basis for homosexuality for decades. Why they can't extend that line of thinking to include an explanation for the inherent aggressiveness and stupidity of the american negro for example, is beyond me.

>>329704
>Uses a little kids cartoon character to help get his point across...
seems like school is out now... time for me to get off.

Racism should be used to protect and defend ethno-cultural homelands from interference and invasion, but nothing else

>>329444
Exactly. It's easy to defend speech you find agreeable, or at least unoffensive, but allowing that isn't freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is letting people like Phelps and the Klan say what they want to say.

Time dust out that 20th century leadership with their militaristic guilt, Germs.

>>329682

I suspect rating a troll gets highly non-linear after about 2-3/10. But approaches the limit of...

10/10 - raging shitstorm ensues, passing onto new thread after old thread hits limit.

Or the alternative formulation...

10/10 - /b/

>>329732
Not all liberals are championing wasteful pseudoscientific research towards the basis of homosexuality. Homos just are, and it's as much of a right for them to be as it is for me to be straight. Semantics is a stupid ass thing to get worked up over, and the whole fucking thing is over the semantics of the word "marriage".

>>329751

10/10 - internet

>>329716
So, it's liberal to think we're all the same, yet it's also liberal to think we're not?

>>329732
Subtle genetic differences between individual humans can lead to major changes such as sexual orientation. However, differences between entire races and elasticities of humanity don't even exist.

Lol liberal double think.

>>329734
Way to focus on the bit that's actually relevant to the discussion.

>>329760
The point is that the genetic based arguments that liberals make in favor of egalitarianism are moot since humans also happen to share 99.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees. Of course for the negro race the figure is probably closer to 99.7%.

>>329704
Human "races" are less diverse than dog breeds. But dog breeds have HUGE fucking differences. They range from utterly retarded (Afghan Hound) to pretty damn smart (Border Collie).

Is it racist to have a sexual preference for particular races?

>>329788

How are human races less diverse than dog breeds? Human races have been diverging at least 20,000 years each... Negroids and Eurasians probably split more than 100,000 years ago. How long have we been breeding dogs?

>>329798

And I don't mean using a racist stereotype, like 'black have bigger cocks.' Just preferring (or excluding) a race because of looks or something.

>>329799
Shorter generations and artificial selection bro. There is more genetic diversity in dog breeds than in the entire family.

>>329778
>The point is that the genetic based arguments that liberals make in favor of egalitarianism
Yeah, but I don't see why you focus on the liberal argument exclusively, when all counter-arguments that are also based on genetics are rendered meaningless as well. It's not just liberals who constantly bring up genetics in race debates.

>>329798
It's perfectly natural to wish to be with your own kind. Don't let girl's pants wearing white guilt stricken liberals tell you otherwise.

>>329813
>>329798

Well I don't find most black or hispanic girls attractive for whatever reason. But some, of course, are hot as.

So, if someone said, 'I have some average looking girls of every race. Pick a race and she'll be in that room for you to fuck.' I would not pick black or hispanic so as to better my chances of having a decent shag (imo).

>>329799
My wife reminded me to point out compare a negroid skull with a Caucasoid skull, then compare Pekingese and an Irish Wolf Hound, just compare the skulls alone let alone everything about the motherfuckers.

>>329798
I don't see why it is. If a guy says "I don't dig blonds, I prefer brunettes" no one would bat an eye.

>>329799
Cats come in a variety of species. Dog breeds, from Chihuahua to Great Dane, are all Canis lupus familiaris. Dogs display far greater variation in their natural states than humans.

>>329391
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfISlq1gzK8
also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1968_Democratic_National_Convention_protest_activity
lrn 2 history.

in germany, you get thrown into prison for wearing a CROSSED OUT swastika with "kill all nazis" written under it. because it's, y'know, a swastika.

true story. happened to some antifa kiddy a few years ago.

also, shouting "kill all jews, heil hitler" is totally legal, as long as you're shouting it in arabic, farsi or turkish.

again, true story.

>>329841

Yeah but.

Hair colour is not really the same thing. Can be changed, restyled, removed. Only wacko tried that with his race. And maybe his/her sexuality too.

>>329831
>>329831
>>329831
You don't have a wife. enjoy your hand, virgin.

>>329798
>>329841
>>329885
it is for goyim, according to jews. no, seriously, according to the jewish elite there should be two distinct races, jews and goyim.

>>329885
I don't see a difference? You find certain traits attractive or you don't. If you're not into black chicks because they're "an inferior race" or anti-race mixing, yeah that's racist, if you don't tend to find them attractive, that is your preference.

>>329891
Oh r9k, you're so pathetic sometimes.

>>329896

I agree. I know what you mean. I made the OP about this. It's just that I heard a girl say "i'm not into blacks." And I know she is not racist. She really isn't. She's just not sexually attracted to them.

And I posted because many would definitely scream racist at her. I just wondered what people thought.

>>329956
Guilty liberals would cry racism, anyone with a brain would at most question whether she was a racist or not give a damn. My grandfather would pin a medal on her.