Come here for all your /new/s needs.

No for real, we have conservative and liberal news and debate. Libertarians, and even stormfront.

Even Fox News has propaganda on this board.

Huffington Post

/new/ - White Nationalism/General

>>309733

No thanks, /news/ is like participating in a high school aged after school politics club, with everybody thinking their subjective opinions are an axiom everybody else should believe.

The Economist. If you're Canadian, The Walrus magazine is nice, but they only put out 10 issues a year, as they're a non-profit outlet. It's sort of like Harpers.

>the guardian
thats not the times

>>309772
not OP but
>the times
you do know who owns that, right?

The Economist sounds good. I think it's pretty expensive too, but it's a lot to read every week.

>>309772

Sorry, I don't like FOX News bro.

>>309781
Obama and MSNBC?

>>309799

the times is owned by fox/news corp

>>309808
Dont compare Fox news with that filth

who the fuck do you think you are..

its so funny that most of the people that post here feel so empowered and informed because they read a stupid corporate news paper, and so they think no one can "trick" them. wake up lardardass

>>309821

LOL QUE?

Seriously, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I bet you think you're so much more informed than everyone else because you read some cheap news blog written by college dropouts. It's not "corporate" so it must be good, right?

Protip: The Guardian is one of the most unbiased publications there is.

Look into the Christian Science Monitor. I haven't read their weekly, but their online news is very good. It is a secular news source, despite the name.

http://www.csmonitor.com/

>>309832
www.globalresearch.ca
enjoy paying for ur stupid newspaper

>>309845

I will bro. I'm sorry your poor, but you don't need to get angry. Some of us happen to make money and don't mind spending it.

>>309832
lol everyone says that the newspaper they read is the best, unbiased, honest, no one like to pay 200 dollars and then realize how stupid they are.

but trust me op you are fucking retarded.

>The Guardian
>It is known for its left of centre political stance.
-Wikipedia (I don't read your Britfag newspapers so I couldn't say)

Unbiased just means orthodox, not that they don't make value judgments. Unbiased stuff is pretty shitty IMO. It never has fresh thinking and only repeats what politicians and others say.

>>309850
>I will bro. I'm sorry your poor, but you don't need to get angry
> will bro. I'm sorry your poor
>I'm sorry your poor
>your poor
>your

i think you should spend that money in learning proper English dumbass

>>309854

I'm not OP for one.

And I'm curious, what do you read? Where do you obtain your factual information of the world, or do you just shit out subjective opinions and think they're right?

>>309861

Do you want me to point out every grammatical and punctual error in your above posts? You made quite a few of them.

I watched PBS News Hour for the first time yesterday. Was pretty boring, although it was informative I guess. (I think economic news is more interesting and useful.)

They had Christian Science Monitor reporters on. I was like wut, Christian Science? But they were good. Christian Science is pretty fucking weird though. You know Hank Paulson is a Christian Scientist.

>>309871

i see some spelling errors on his part as well, along with broken sentence structure

>>309863
www.globalresearch.ca

their articles are well referenced for everything they post.

www.socialistworker.com

they are biased but i like their observations and if something caught my eye on their articles i confirm it by other sources.

and sometimes read news online for a general outline when im bored.

all of the above are free btw

>>309880
>>309871

not a native english speaker, if you write everything perfectly in a foreign language you will know what i mean.

>>309881
oh btw i forgot to mention BBC newswipe

>>309881
global research doesn't load for me. Are Americans blocked?

>>309875

CSM implies it would probably be the most contradictory, ironic news source ever, but it's actually very secular and left leaning. At least for politics, economics etc etc.

>>309897
mm im at the US and its working fine for me

>>309881
oh btw is www.socialistworker.org

i have those bookmarked so im not used to type it everytime

I think my DNS server sucks. Is Open DNS good?

>>309928

OP here. I'm Canadian, so very socialist and left leaning, and I have to say that site is pretty damn biased. The Guardian and Economist at least has some conservatives in the mix.

>>309930

they're great

>>309875
CSM is a secular news source. The only religious information they publish is one article each day from a Christian Science perspective. Nothing else is related. The only reason they keep the name is because they want to be honest about who owns it (the church).

>>309902
Both sides seem to think CSM is biased. I've heard them referred to as both liberal and ultraconservative. I've never noticed much of a bias, myself.

>>309955
they target "liberals" all the time too

but yeah they are biased, i had read alot of conservative articles and its pretty retarded all the time.

>>309955

>>309839

Holy shit, they actually aren't bad. Thanks for the advice.

>>310074
No problem. It's a shame that they're not more popular. I think the name throws people off.

MACLEANS has tons of interesting stuff in it these days. Whatever else it might be, It's not a boring piece of shit anymore.

The Globe and Mail or the Toronto Star for newspaper.
For online, the New York Times, Al Jazeera English, the BBC, http://www.irinnews.org/, Democracy Now, The Nation, Alternet, Glenn Greenwald, Matt Taibbi and the eXiled Online.

>>309832
>The Guardian is one of the most unbiased publications there is.